Статті в журналах: "Intrahousehold resource allocation"

1

Handa, Sudhanshu. "Gender, headship and intrahousehold resource allocation." World Development 22, no. 10 (October 1994): 1535–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(94)90036-1.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Bonnekessen, Barbara. "Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries:Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries." Culture Agriculture 21, no. 1 (March 1999): 46–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/cag.1999.21.1.46.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Doss, Cheryl R. "Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in an Uncertain Environment." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78, no. 5 (December 1996): 1335–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1243517.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Doss, Cheryl R. "Testing among models of intrahousehold resource allocation." World Development 24, no. 10 (October 1996): 1597–609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(96)00063-0.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Anderson, S., and J. M. Baland. "The Economics of Roscas and Intrahousehold Resource Allocation." Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, no. 3 (August 1, 2002): 963–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355302760193931.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Doss, C. "Intrahousehold Bargaining and Resource Allocation in Developing Countries." World Bank Research Observer 28, no. 1 (January 28, 2013): 52–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkt001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Salifu, Gamel Abdul-Nasser. "Spousal Secret Affairs with Money: Intra-household Allocative Efficiency in Spaces of Gender Politics in Development." International Journal of Business Administration 12, no. 3 (May 7, 2021): 108. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v12n3p108.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Persisting gender inequities across political, economic and social life have spurred the global agenda to re-examine the triggers and consequences of gender disaggregation in household resource allocations. Defining and measuring intrahousehold allocations has been at the centre of the current debates among international development scholars and practitioners. The lack of clear consensus on intrahousehold public good allocation has consistently limited widespread efforts to design and evaluate programmes and policies aimed at improving women’s welfare. Based on intrahousehold allocation models, this paper proposes a conceptual framework which can accommodate the welfare of the household as an economic entreprise. Building on Sen (1989) and Kabeer (1999), this paper selectively reviews the abundant literature that offers insights into intra-household decision- making process and gender relations. The review illustrates the importance of intrahousehold allocations and describes a set of individual strategies that household agents use to by-pass intrahousehold negotiations and to secure private consumption. In many of the instances where inefficiencies have been identified in the data, a possible immediate cause is individual behaviour aimed at securing personal resources and consumption. Even, if they come, at the expense of total resources available to the household. Although, it need not be the case that such strategic behaviour are necessarily the source of inefficiencies, they may well be feeding the flames of suboptimality in household production entreprises.. That said, the paper clearly iterates circumstances under which non-cooperative behaviour of spousal income hiding could be vital to circumventing social norms which undermine Pareto productive efficiency. The paper further highlights the role played by collective resistance of social forces to economic changes that threaten social norms and gender roles. The study pinpoints evidence of collaborative efforts to stop women from embracing new economic opportunities that overturn traditional roles. Investigating the role played by household structure in reaching Pareto optimality for inefficient rural households, the paper concludes that neither monogamous nor polygynous conjugal units attain higher margins of efficiency. Instead, household agents played dictator games in public good allocation and responded opportunistically to private choices and strategies which optimized secret consumption.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Bhalotra, Sonia, and Cliff Attfield. "Intrahousehold resource allocation in rural Pakistan: a semiparametric analysis." Journal of Applied Econometrics 13, no. 5 (September 1998): 463–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1255(1998090)13:5<463::aid-jae510>3.0.co;2-3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Ellis, Frank. "Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Methods, Models, and Policy." Food Policy 22, no. 6 (December 1997): 562–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0306-9192(98)00011-6.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Fujii, Tomoki, and Ryuichiro Ishikawa. "How Does Childbirth Alter Intrahousehold Resource Allocation? Evidence from Japan*." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 75, no. 3 (March 30, 2012): 362–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2012.00699.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Klasen, Stephan. "Marriage, Bargaining, and Intrahousehold Resource Allocation: Excess Female Mortality among Adults during Early German Development, 1740–1860." Journal of Economic History 58, no. 2 (June 1998): 432–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s002205070002057x.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This article investigates sex-specific mortality rates in eighteenth- and nineteenthcentury rural Germany to determine whether there was any gender bias in the allocation of household resources. Family reconstitution data from 60 villages provide evidence of considerable excess female mortality among married adults. The empirical findings are consistent with a bargaining approach to understanding intrahousehold resource allocation and suggest that women's survival disadvantage is related to their positions in the remarriage market, the perceived value of their work, as well as differences in altruism. Agricultural change appears to be one factor responsible for the emergence of this disadvantage.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Li, Lixing, and Xiaoyu Wu. "Gender of Children, Bargaining Power, and Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in China." Journal of Human Resources 46, no. 2 (2011): 295–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/jhr.46.2.295.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Namoro, Soiliou, and Rania Roushdy. "Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Egypt: Women Empowerment and Investment in Children." Middle East Development Journal 1, no. 1 (January 2009): 105–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1793812009000036.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Li, Lixing, and Xiaoyu Wu. "Gender of Children, Bargaining Power, and Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in China." Journal of Human Resources 46, no. 2 (2011): 295–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2011.0014.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Frijters, Paul, David W. Johnston, Manisha Shah, and Michael A. Shields. "Intrahousehold Resource Allocation: Do Parents Reduce or Reinforce Child Ability Gaps?" Demography 50, no. 6 (June 20, 2013): 2187–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0224-2.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Maggs, Philip, and John Hoddinott. "The impact of changes in common property resource management on intrahousehold allocation." Journal of Public Economics 72, no. 2 (May 1999): 317–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(98)00096-6.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Zivin, Joshua Graff, Harsha Thirumurthy, and Markus Goldstein. "AIDS treatment and intrahousehold resource allocation: Children's nutrition and schooling in Kenya." Journal of Public Economics 93, no. 7-8 (August 2009): 1008–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.03.003.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Horrell, Sara, and Deborah Oxley. "Crust or crumb?: Intrahousehold resource allocation and male breadwinning in late Victorian Britain." Economic History Review 52, no. 3 (August 1999): 494–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.00134.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Pfeiffer, James, Stephen Gloyd, and Lucy Ramirez Li. "Intrahousehold resource allocation and child growth in Mozambique: an ethnographic case–control study." Social Science & Medicine 53, no. 1 (July 2001): 83–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00311-7.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Behrman, Jere R. "Intra-family Distribution in Developing Countries." Pakistan Development Review 33, no. 3 (September 1, 1994): 253–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.30541/v33i3pp.253-296.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Intra-household allocations appear to be quite important in the determination of time use, human resource investments, and intra- and inter-generational transfers in developing countries. The nature of such allocations has important implications for the efficiency, equity, and efficacy of the micro and macro-economic policies. In the past decade and a half, there has been substantial progress in modelling intrahousehold allocations in ways that lead to testable propositions despite enormous data limitations regarding the nature of the allocation of unobserved variables and the impact of unobserved heterogeneous endowments. The parent -child exchange literature is a subset of these studies that advances in two dimensions by allowing children to have different preferences from their parents' and by incorporating a broader notion of interactions, including the attention provided by the children to their parents. Yet this literature has most of the problems that are indicated with regard to the unified household preference models. The exchange literature to date has assumed away het" erogeneity in endowments which plays such a critical role in the studies that assume the unified household preferences. It is also silent on how human resource investments enter into the relations between parents and children. The collective models of household behaviour emphasise that different household members. usually husband and wife. may have different preferences and a different command over resources. Interesting theoretical results have been derived concerning the conditions under which the income-sharing rules and the allocation of non-assignable goods can be derived. But there are many limitations in this literature. The literature on the collective models of household behaviours is static and gives little consideration to the dynamic processes and learning.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Bargain, Olivier, Guy Lacroix, and Luca Tiberti. "Intrahousehold Resource Allocation and Individual Poverty: Assessing Collective Model Predictions using Direct Evidence on Sharing." Economic Journal 132, no. 643 (November 13, 2021): 865–905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueab085.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract Welfare analyses conducted by policy practitioners around the world usually rely on equivalised or per capita expenditures and ignore the extent of within-household inequality. Recent advances in the estimation of collective models suggest ways to retrieve the complete sharing process within families using homogeneity assumptions (typically preference stability upon exclusive goods across individuals or household types) and the observation of exclusive goods. So far, the prediction of these models has not been validated, essentially because intrahousehold allocation is seldom observed. We provide such a validation by leveraging a unique dataset from Bangladesh, which contains information on the fully individualised expenditures of each family member. We also test the core assumption (efficiency) and homogeneity assumptions used for identification. It turns out that the collective model predicts individual resources reasonably well when using clothing, i.e., one of the rare goods commonly assignable to males, females and children in standard expenditure surveys. It also allows for identifying poor individuals in non-poor households, while the traditional approach understates poverty among the poorest individuals.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Kaiser, Lucia L., and Kathryn G. Dewey. "Household economic strategies, food resource allocation, and intrahousehold patterns of dietary intake in rural Mexico." Ecology of Food and Nutrition 25, no. 2 (April 1991): 123–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03670244.1991.9991162.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Sarker, Fatema, Thomas Daum, and Regina Birner. "Intrahousehold Allocation of Nutritious Food in Livestock Farming Communities in Bangladesh: Does Women's Empowerment Make a Difference?" Current Developments in Nutrition 6, Supplement_1 (June 2022): 533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac077.036.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract Objectives The study's specific objective is to assess differences in food allocation among the household members by age and gender in livestock farming communities and identify the determinants of existing differences. In addition, investigating the association between women's empowerment in livestock rearing and the intrahousehold food allocation pattern is the second objective of the present study. Methods The study uses a mixed-method approach. A quantitative survey with 275 households collects information about the socioeconomic status of the households and the amount of nutritious food intake (milk, meat, fish, and egg), land, and livestock resource ownership. The study uses vignettes cards to collect information about the women's empowerment status in four areas: decision-related to livestock production, marketing of livestock, use of livestock income, and household nutrition. The study collects qualitative data from nine focus group discussions about the perception of nutritious food intake and health benefits and food allocation among their children, adolescents, and adults. Results The results partly confirm that the children and partners of empowered women by livestock intervention had better protein intake and women's protein intake was reduced. In households with a higher empowerment level of women, the protein food intake of adolescent girls is not increased equally compared with adolescent boys. Sociocultural norms, patriarchal influence, economic conditions, household size, participation in training, and membership in social groups influence food distribution among household members. Conclusions Policies and interventions that aim to empower women in livestock for better food security and nutritional outcomes need to be based on understanding the intrahousehold nutritious food allocation. Funding Sources German Academic Exchange Program (DAAD).

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

FUWA, Nobuhiko, Seiro ITO, Kensuke KUBO, Takashi KUROSAKI, and Yasuyuki SAWADA. "INTRODUCTION TO A STUDY OF INTRAHOUSEHOLD RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN RURAL ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA." Developing Economies 44, no. 4 (October 27, 2006): 375–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2006.00022.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

O'Laughlin, Bridget. "A Bigger Piece of a Very Small Pie: Intrahousehold Resource Allocation and Poverty Reduction in Africa." Development and Change 38, no. 1 (January 2007): 21–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00401.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

Haddad, Lawrence. "International conference on intrahousehold resource allocation: Policy issues and research methods, Washington, DC, 12–14 February 1992." Food Policy 18, no. 6 (December 1993): 523–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(93)90008-y.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

FUWA, Nobuhiko, Seiro ITO, Kensuke KUBO, Takashi KUROSAKI, and Yasuyuki SAWADA. "GENDER DISCRIMINATION, INTRAHOUSEHOLD RESOURCE ALLOCATION, AND IMPORTANCE OF SPOUSES’ FATHERS: EVIDENCE ON HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE FROM RURAL INDIA." Developing Economies 44, no. 4 (October 27, 2006): 398–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2006.00023.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Mikalitsa, SM. "Intrahousehold allocation, household headship and nutrition of under-fives: a study of western Kenya." African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 15, no. 68 (February 23, 2015): 9708–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.68.13585.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This paper aims to establish whether there is a significant difference in nutritional status of children in male-headed households, de jure female-headed households and de facto female-headed households. The study uses a sample of 199 children aged 6 to 60 months, of mothers in reproductive age, derived from 499 smallholder households in rural Kenya. The sample was selected using multi-stage stratified sampling technique. Three indices namely; height/length-for-age z-scores (stunting), weight-for-age zscores (underweight) and weight-for-height (wasting) z-scores were examined on children in two regions (Vihiga and Busia) in western Kenya. However, for the purpose of testing hypothesis, stunting is used due to its strength in measuring long term effect of food scarcity as compared to wasting and underweight which may vary depending on the period the data is collected (seasonal variation). Two-way (between groups) Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is used to analyse the height/length–for-age z-scores against household headship. Household headship is stratified according to whether the husband is present and active in decision making (male- headed household), the husband lives away from the household but maintains regular contact with the family including sending remittances (de facto female-headed household), or the woman is recognized as head of household because she is a widow, divorced or separated (de jure female-headed household). Western Kenya is characterized by relatively high levels of undernutrition despite being classified as a region of high agricultural potential. In addition, there is increasing trend of female-headed households in the region hence the need to demonstrate the effect of household headship on nutritional status of the children. The results indicate that household headship has a large and significant effect on stunting of under five children [F (1, 93) = 4.675, p=.0.012]. More boys (37 %) than girls (33%) were stunted and Busia had more children who were stunted (37%) than Vihiga (25%). The study reaffirms the need to enhance women’s control over household resource allocation as one way of enhancing child nutrition in western Kenya.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Nguyen, Ngoc-Minh, and Anh Nguyen. "Crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Vietnam." Tobacco Control 29, Suppl 5 (August 26, 2020): s326—s330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055307.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

PurposeThis study aims at analysing the causal crowding-out effect of tobacco spending on intrahousehold budget share in Vietnam. Besides, we also examine the differences in expenditure patterns between tobacco spending households and non-spending households in Vietnam as well as determine the reason behind these differences.MethodsWe estimated a system of quadratic conditional Engel curve to determine intrahousehold resource allocation using the latest Vietnam Household Living Standard Survey data in 2016. In order to estimate the causal crowding-out effect of tobacco spending, GMM 3SLS method is used to simultaneously deal with heteroscedasticity and endogeneity problems.ResultsAlthough the Wald test results propose the difference in preferences between tobacco spending and non-spending households in Vietnam, once controlling for household characteristics, the results from GMM 3SLS method show that the differences are insignificant. Generally, the crowding-out effect of tobacco spending in Vietnamese households is modest because of the small share of tobacco in the total household expenditure. An increase in tobacco expenditure only leads to a fall in the budget shares of education. The crowding-out effect, however, mainly appears in the case of low-income households.ConclusionsThe reduction in education caused by tobacco consumption, particularly in low-income households, may extend inequality and thus prevent the socioeconomic development in Vietnam in the long term. Additionally, the tiny share of tobacco in household expenditure reveals that the price of tobacco products in Vietnam is extremely low, leading to high proportion of tobacco smokers. Government, therefore, should continuously increase the tobacco tax so that it could restrict the tobacco affordability.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Zhong, Gao, Liu, Huang, and Luo. "Quantity–Quality Trade-Off and Early Childhood Development in Rural Family: Evidence from China’s Guizhou Province." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 7 (April 11, 2019): 1307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071307.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This paper empirically investigates the causal effect of having siblings on the cognitive, language, motor, and social-emotional skills of infants under the age of 2 in rural families in Guizhou Province in China. The results are based on data from a survey conducted in 2017. To effectively relieve the endogeneity induced by selection bias, we applied the matching-smoothing (MS) method to evaluate the effects of having siblings. The results show that, first, having siblings produces significant negative impacts on an infant’s cognitive, language, and social-emotional skills; second, intrahousehold resource allocation is the mechanism behind the Quantity–Quality (Q–Q) trade-off, and it exerts its effects through two key identified channels—the home environment and parental warmth. By spreading the parents’ investment among siblings in terms of both the home environment and parental warmth, having siblings hinders infants’ early development. Our findings provide new evidence for the relation between the Q–Q trade-off and early childhood development in rural families in western China.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Oikonomou, Rigas, and Christian Siegel. "CAPITAL TAXES, LABOR TAXES AND THE HOUSEHOLD." Journal of Demographic Economics 81, no. 3 (September 2015): 217–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dem.2015.7.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract:We study the impact of capital and labor taxation in an economy where couples bargain over the intrahousehold allocation under limited commitment. In this framework more wealth improves commitment and gives rise to insurance gains within the household. Our theory motivates these gains by the empirical observation that wealth, in contrast to labor income, is a commonly held resource within households. Based on this observation we study whether eliminating capital taxes from the economy, and raising labor taxes to balance the government’s budget, may generate welfare gains to married households. We illustrate that the quantitative effects from this reform are rather small. We attribute the small effects to the life cycle pattern of wealth accumulation and to the impact of labor income taxes on household risk sharing: In particular, we show that higher labor taxes may make the limited commitment friction more severe, even though they may make the distribution of labor income more equitable within the household.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Mohanty, Itismita, and ANU RAMMOHAN. "Child schooling in India: the role of gender." Indian Growth and Development Review 8, no. 1 (April 13, 2015): 93–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/igdr-03-2014-0008.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Purpose – This paper aims to analyse factors that influence child schooling outcomes in India, specifically the role of gender. Design/methodology/approach – This paper uses data from the nationally representative Indian National Family Health Surveys 1995-1996 and 2005-2006 and estimates Heckman sample selection, cluster fixed-effects and household fixed-effects econometric models. The dependent variables are the child’s enrolment status and conditional on enrolment child’s years of schooling. Findings – This analysis finds statistically significant evidence of male advantage both in schooling enrolment as well as years of schooling. However, using a cluster fixed-effects model, our analysis finds that within a village, conditional on being enrolled, girls spend more years in school relative to boys. Other results show that parental schooling has a positive and statistically significant impact on child schooling. There is statistically significant wealth effect, community effect and regional disparities between states in India. Originality/value – The large sample size and the range of questions available in this data set, allows us to explore the influence of individual, household and village level social, economic and cultural factors on child schooling. The role of gender on child schooling within a village, intrahousehold resource allocation for schooling and regional gender differences in schooling are important issues in India, where education outcomes remain poor for large segments of the population.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Prabhu, Vimalanand S. "Tests of Intrahousehold Resource Allocation Using a CV Framework: A Comparison of Husbands’ and Wives’ Separate and Joint WTP in the Slums of Navi-Mumbai, India." World Development 38, no. 4 (April 2010): 606–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.002.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Orazem, Peter F. "Haddad, Lawrence, John Hoddinott, and Harold Alderman, eds. Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Models, Methods, and Policy . Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997, 384 pp., $@@‐@@55.00." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81, no. 2 (May 1999): 480–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1244597.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Inchauste, Gabriela. "Intrahousehold Allocation of Resources: The Bolivian Family." IMF Working Papers 01, no. 57 (2001): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781451847772.001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Farmer, Amy, and Jill Tiefenthaler. "Fairness concepts and the intrahousehold allocation of resources." Journal of Development Economics 47, no. 2 (August 1995): 179–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(95)00009-f.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Tunyut, Wuttipong. "Intrahousehold Resources Allocation in Thailand: Sharing Rules and Determinants." Journal of Economics, Business and Management 10, no. 1 (2022): 29–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/joebm.2022.10.1.669.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Yaya, Sanni, Friday Okonofua, Lorretta Ntoimo, Ogochukwu Udenige, and Ghose Bishwajit. "Gender inequity as a barrier to women’s access to skilled pregnancy care in rural Nigeria: a qualitative study." International Health 11, no. 6 (April 27, 2019): 551–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihz019.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract Background Maternal mortality has been an issue of global importance, with continued efforts by the international development community towards its reduction. The provision of high quality maternal healthcare has been identified as a key strategy in preventing maternal mortality. Gendered intrahousehold power structures, gendered dynamics of resource allocation and women’s limited ability in decision-making can have a huge impact on maternal health-seeking behaviour and overall health status. Using a gender lens, this study explores the root causes of women’s limited access to and utilisation of maternal healthcare services in rural areas of Edo State, Nigeria. Methods This qualitative study involved the analysis of data collected from gender- and age-desegregated focus group discussions (FDGs) in 20 communities in Etsako East and Esan South East local government areas of Edo State, Nigeria. Focus group participants comprised women between the ages of 15–45 y who have been pregnant within the last 5 y and their male spouses and partners of varying ages. A total of 20 FGDs were conducted. Coded transcripts were reviewed and analysed using the gender framework as an analytical guide. Results Most responses indicated that women did not entirely have the power to make decisions regarding when to seek care during pregnancy. Women’s experiences of access to quality care showed intersecting areas of gender and social economic status (SES) and how they impact on access to health. Many of the responses suggested high levels of economic marginalisation among women with women being financially dependent on their spouses and partners for pregnancy healthcare-related costs. Furthermore, a man’s financial status determined the type of care his spouse or partner sought. Women identified a high workload as an issue during pregnancy and a barrier to accessing maternal healthcare services. The role of men within households was generally perceived as that of financial providers, therefore a husband’s support was commonly constructed to solely mean financial support. Conclusion This paper brings attention to the role of gender and SES in producing and sustaining limitations to women’s access to quality care. Interventions geared towards supporting women’s financial independence is an important step towards improving their access to skilled healthcare, more so are interventions that improve women’s decision-making capacities.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Rangel, Marcos A. "Alimony Rights and Intrahousehold Allocation of Resources: Evidence from Brazil." Economic Journal 116, no. 513 (July 1, 2006): 627–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01104.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Baer, Roberta D., and Lorena Madrigal. "Intrahousehold allocation of resources in larger and smaller Mexican households." Social Science & Medicine 36, no. 3 (February 1993): 305–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90014-u.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Xu, Sijia, Abu S. Shonchoy, and Tomoki Fujii. "Assessing gender parity in intrahousehold allocation of educational resources: Evidence from Bangladesh." World Development 151 (March 2022): 105730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105730.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

Lee, Jungmin, and Mark L. Pocock. "Intrahousehold allocation of financial resources: evidence from South Korean individual bank accounts." Review of Economics of the Household 5, no. 1 (March 9, 2007): 41–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11150-007-9004-3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

Zick, Cathleen D. "Do families share-and-share-alike? The need to understand intrahousehold resource allocations." Journal of Family and Economic Issues 13, no. 4 (1992): 407–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01018922.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Quisumbing, Agnes R., and John A. Maluccio. "Resources at Marriage and Intrahousehold Allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa*." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65, no. 3 (July 2003): 283–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00052.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Diiro, Gracious M., Monica Fisher, Menale Kassie, Beatrice W. Muriithi, and Geoffrey Muricho. "How does adoption of labor saving agricultural technologies affect intrahousehold resource allocations? The case of push-pull technology in Western Kenya." Food Policy 102 (July 2021): 102114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102114.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

Yi, Junjian, James J. Heckman, Junsen Zhang, and Gabriella Conti. "Early Health Shocks, Intrahousehold Resource Allocation, and Child Outcomes." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2543905.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Fujii, Tomoki, and Ryuichiro Ishikawa. "How Does Childbirth Alter Intrahousehold Resource Allocation?: Evidence from Japan." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1966325.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

48

"Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Models, Methods, and Policies." Food and Nutrition Bulletin 19, no. 1 (January 1998): 71–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/156482659801900111.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Xu, Sijia, Abu Shonchoy, and Tomoki Fujii. "Illusion of Gender Parity in Education: Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Bangladesh." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3386159.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Razzaque, Mohammad A., and A. Ahsanuzzaman. "Intrahousehold Resource Allocation and Women’s Bargaining Power: New Evidence from Bangladesh." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1550559.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Статті в журналах з теми "Intrahousehold resource allocation"

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями