Статті в журналах: "History and criticism"

1

Beardslee, Michael D. "The Dogma of History." Religion & Theology 24, no. 3-4 (2017): 295–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15743012-02403006.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This essay considers the role of historiography in doctrinal criticism from a hermeneutical perspective and in light of postcolonial and postmodern criticisms. First, historiography is defined using a Gadamerian typology, providing the basis for an analysis of Kenneth Scott Latourette’s well-respected essay on Christian historiography. This reading of Latourette illuminates the dogmatic nature of the prejudices informing Christian historical scholarship. Finally, these insights are applied to doctrinal criticism, arguing that the relationship between doctrine and historiography is dialectical, rather than one element having dominance over the other. It concludes by suggesting a chastened, “two-tiered” approach to doctrinal criticism capable of responding to the charges mentioned and to current trends in global Christianity.

2

McH., B., and Dominick LaCapra. "History and Criticism." Poetics Today 7, no. 3 (1986): 594. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1772526.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Docherty, Thomas. "Criticism, history, Foucault." History of European Ideas 14, no. 3 (May 1992): 365–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(92)90214-w.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Walker, Lawrence D., and Dominick Lacapra. "History and Criticism." American Historical Review 91, no. 2 (April 1986): 359. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1858142.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Leach, Andrew, and Antony Moulis. "History, Criticism, Judgment, Project." Architectural Theory Review 15, no. 3 (December 2010): 298–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2010.524305.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Shiff, Richard. "On Criticism Handling History." History of the Human Sciences 2, no. 1 (February 1989): 63–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095269518900200104.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Siegel, Katy. "Art, History, and Criticism." Art Journal 71, no. 1 (March 2012): 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2012.10791077.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Botstein, Leon. "On Criticism and History." Musical Quarterly 79, no. 1 (1995): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mq/79.1.1.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Griffin. "“Comparative Literary History”." Criticism 57, no. 4 (2015): 691. http://dx.doi.org/10.13110/criticism.57.4.0691.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

HOWARD,, DAVID M. "Rhetorical Criticism in Old Testament Studies." Bulletin for Biblical Research 4, no. 1 (January 1, 1994): 87–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26422104.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract Rhetorical criticism in Old Testament studies—indeed, in biblical studies in general—had its origins in a self-conscious way in 1968, when James Muilenburg issued his now-famous call to go beyond form criticism and focus upon the unique features of a text. Since then, biblical rhetorical criticisms have flourished. However, in Old Testament studies, rhetorical criticism has tended to be primarily a literary concern, with emphasis upon stylistics. Classical and contemporary rhetorical criticisms are very different, however. These focus particularly upon the suasive aspects of spoken discourse. This paper reviews the history of rhetorical criticism in Old Testament studies and in the field of speech and rhetoric, comparing and contrasting approaches. It then issues a call to biblical scholars to practice a truly "rhetorical" criticism, based upon speech and persuasion.

11

HOWARD,, DAVID M. "Rhetorical Criticism in Old Testament Studies." Bulletin for Biblical Research 4, no. 1 (January 1, 1994): 87–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/bullbiblrese.4.1.0087.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract Rhetorical criticism in Old Testament studies—indeed, in biblical studies in general—had its origins in a self-conscious way in 1968, when James Muilenburg issued his now-famous call to go beyond form criticism and focus upon the unique features of a text. Since then, biblical rhetorical criticisms have flourished. However, in Old Testament studies, rhetorical criticism has tended to be primarily a literary concern, with emphasis upon stylistics. Classical and contemporary rhetorical criticisms are very different, however. These focus particularly upon the suasive aspects of spoken discourse. This paper reviews the history of rhetorical criticism in Old Testament studies and in the field of speech and rhetoric, comparing and contrasting approaches. It then issues a call to biblical scholars to practice a truly "rhetorical" criticism, based upon speech and persuasion.

12

Griffith, R. Drew, and George A. Kennedy. "The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. 1: Classical Criticism." Phoenix 46, no. 2 (1992): 170. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1088477.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Ann Reynolds. "A History of Failure." Criticism 56, no. 2 (2014): 187. http://dx.doi.org/10.13110/criticism.56.2.0187.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Green, Joel B. "Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation." Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, no. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421422.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract In recent years, theological interpretation of Christian Scripture has often been distinguished by its wholesale antipathy toward history and/or to historical criticism. Working with a typology of different forms of "historical criticism," this essay urges (1) that historical criticism understood as reconstruction of "what really happened" and/or historical criticism that assumes the necessary segregation of "facts" from "faith" is inimical to theological interpretation; (2) that this form of historical criticism is increasingly difficult to support in light of contemporary work in the philosophy of history; and (3) that contemporary theological interpretation is dependent on expressions of historical criticism concerned with the historical situation within which the biblical materials were generated, including the sociocultural conventions they take for granted.

15

Green, Joel B. "Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation." Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, no. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.5.2.0159.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract In recent years, theological interpretation of Christian Scripture has often been distinguished by its wholesale antipathy toward history and/or to historical criticism. Working with a typology of different forms of "historical criticism," this essay urges (1) that historical criticism understood as reconstruction of "what really happened" and/or historical criticism that assumes the necessary segregation of "facts" from "faith" is inimical to theological interpretation; (2) that this form of historical criticism is increasingly difficult to support in light of contemporary work in the philosophy of history; and (3) that contemporary theological interpretation is dependent on expressions of historical criticism concerned with the historical situation within which the biblical materials were generated, including the sociocultural conventions they take for granted.

16

Ignatova, Irina, and Elena Zubarkina. "Media Criticism in Germany: History and Theory." Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism 8, no. 3 (July 16, 2019): 512–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2019.8(3).512-523.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The article is dedicated to the study of the history and theory of media criticism in Germany and the importance of the phenomenon of media criticism for the development and successful functioning of the mass media in German-speaking countries. The theoretical preconditions for the development of media criticism in Germany and its historical stages play an important role in understanding the modern institution of media criticism and the mechanisms of its impact on the recipient. Media criticism has existed since the media themselves appeared, and the existence and emergence of new media is always accompanied by positive or negative feedback on them. The development of the media inevitably leads to their criticism. The article considers media criticism as a global criticism of the media and as a study of individual specific phenomena in the media environment. The estimated role of media criticism is recognized by German-speaking researchers as one of the main functions. And it must be understood that media criticism provides an opportunity for a reasoned discussion about the media, without which neither the existence of the media, nor indeed the society as a whole is possible. Media criticism generates an open discussion and thereby contributes to the enlightenment of society. To some extent, setting norms and standards for the quality of journalism, it forms ethical boundaries of communication, both for journalists and for the audience. The stages of development of media criticism in Germany, described in the article, cover the period from the late 1980s to the present. The main subsystems of mass media are considered: television media criticism, media criticism on the radio, in print media, media criticism in the Internet space. Thanks to this, we get a full picture of the formation and development of media criticism in Germany.

17

KUPRIYANOV, A. "WESTPHALIAN MYTH: HISTORY AND CRITICISM." Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal, no. 3 (2019): 37–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/afij-2019-3-37-50.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Williams, Joyce. "Design discourse: History/theory/criticism." Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 15, no. 3 (January 1992): 327–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1061-7361(92)90014-5.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Triggs, Teal. "Writing Design Criticism into History." Design and Culture 5, no. 1 (March 2013): 33–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175470813x13491105785505.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Cunningham, Stuart. "Docker: Criticism, History and Policy." Media Information Australia 59, no. 1 (February 1991): 27–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878x9105900104.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Gibert, John C., and George A. Kennedy. "The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Volume I: Classical Criticism." Classical World 84, no. 6 (1991): 514. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4350972.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Peradotto, John, and George A. Kennedy. "The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Volume I: Classical Criticism." American Journal of Philology 113, no. 3 (1992): 473. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/295476.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Sim, Jeong-Myoung. "Interaction between Korean and Japanese Intellectuals in the Context of Criticism of Nationalism." Korean Association For Japanese History 59 (December 31, 2022): 91–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.24939/kjh.2022.12.59.91.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This paper examines the exchange of intellectuals between Korea and Japan from the late 1990s to the 2000s, focusing on the criticism of nationalism or post-nationalism. Criticism of nationalism, which was actively raised in Korea around 2000, was based on globalization or postmodernism theory. And this criticism became more active when Japan's 『New History Textbook』 passed the official approval in 1997. Active self-criticism of Korean nationalism is triggered as Korean historians argue that criticizing Japan's nationalist history and criticizing Korea's national history and textbooks are overlapping. This is also influenced by Jie-Hyun Lim, who wrote 『Nationalism is treason』 and criticized nationalism early on. Later, through the magazine 『Dangdaebipyeong』, he actively introduced criticism of nationalism in Japan, and by launching the <East Asian Historical Forum for Criticism and Solidarity> he began full-fledged academic exchange between Japanese and Korean intellectuals to criticize nationalism. This paper analyzes the discussions on the critique of nationalism between Korea and Japan through he pages of the journal and academic exchanges, and examines how the exchanges of intellectuals at the time, criticizing nationalism, formed a complex relationship with their own national identity.

24

Gotera, V. "Practical Criticism." Radical History Review 1994, no. 58 (January 1, 1994): 171–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01636545-1994-58-171.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Əflatun qızı Pirəliyeva, Elnurə. "History of the development of epistolary style: from the past to the present." SCIENTIFIC WORK 15, no. 2 (March 9, 2021): 107–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/63/107-109.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The first example of epistolary style in world literature is Horace`s Letter to the Pisons. It has been used in the history of Azerbaijani literature in three genres of epistolary style: verse letter, literary letter and open letter. The first example of a poetic letter is in the works of G. Tabrizi in the 11th century by M.F.Akhundov. We meet withopen letters in Akhundov`s works. Open letter is a genre of literary criticsm, verse letter and literary letter are genres of literary criticism. Key words: criticism, epistolary style, verse letter, literary letter, open letter

26

Ian Mason Kennedy. "Redeeming the Aural: Amodal Resonance and Media History." Criticism 55, no. 3 (2013): 507. http://dx.doi.org/10.13110/criticism.55.3.0507.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Hornsby, Joseph, and David Aers. "Medieval Literature: Criticism, Ideology and History." South Atlantic Review 53, no. 1 (January 1988): 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3200408.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Samson, Anne, and David Aers. "Medieval Literature: Criticism, Ideology and History." Modern Language Review 84, no. 4 (October 1989): 917. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3731173.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Trimpi, Wesley. "The Cambridge History Of Literary Criticism." Ancient Philosophy 12, no. 2 (1992): 505–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil199212235.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Cain, William E., and Vincent B. Leitch. "Writing the History of Literary Criticism." College English 51, no. 3 (March 1989): 320. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/377724.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Reynolds, R. Clay, and R. S. Gwynn. "New Expansive Poetry: Theory, Criticism, History." South Central Review 17, no. 3 (2000): 141. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3190100.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Farkas, Zoltán. "Literary criticism in Psellus’ short history." Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 48, no. 1-2 (January 2008): 187–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/aant.48.2008.1-2.21.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Jarvie, I. C. "Criticism and the History of Science." International Studies in Philosophy 31, no. 2 (1999): 111–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil199931218.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Marshall, I. Howard. "Book Review: History, Criticism and Theology." Expository Times 116, no. 2 (November 2004): 67–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001452460411600217.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Andrew, Dudley. "Historical Critique and History as Criticism." Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies 6, no. 3 (September 1, 1988): 127–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/02705346-6-3_18-127.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Stern, Kimberly J. "A History of Feminist Literary Criticism." Women's Writing 16, no. 1 (May 2009): 173–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09699080902854503.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Martins, Estevão C. de Rezende. "Crisis and criticism of contemporary history." Revista Estudos do Século XX, no. 10 (2010): 85–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/1647-8622_10_5.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

PYKETT, L. "Literary History and Criticism: General Works." Year's Work in English Studies 63, no. 1 (January 1, 1985): 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ywes/63.1.1.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

DAVISON, P. "Literary History and Criticism: General Works." Year's Work in English Studies 64, no. 1 (January 1, 1986): 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ywes/64.1.1.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

McConkey, Matthew. "John Clare: nature, criticism and history." Textual Practice 32, no. 2 (January 8, 2018): 361–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2017.1420602.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Grishechko, O. S., A. S. Akopova, and E. G. Grishechko. "English linguistic purism: history, development, criticism." Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology, no. 4 (2015): 185–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.18522/1995-0640-2015-4-185-192.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

Gunderson, Robert G. "Reflections on history and rhetorical criticism." Communication Education 35, no. 4 (October 1986): 408–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634528609388367.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

Dancer, Thom. "Literary Criticism: A Concise Political History." Comparative Literature 71, no. 1 (March 1, 2019): 117–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00104124-7217100.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Gearhart, Suzanne, and Dominick LaCapra. "History as Criticism: The Dialogue of History and Literature." Diacritics 17, no. 3 (1987): 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/464835.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Zohar Weiman-Kelman. "Touching Time: Poetry, History, and the Erotics of Yiddish." Criticism 59, no. 1 (2017): 99. http://dx.doi.org/10.13110/criticism.59.1.0099.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

Spellman, Robert L. "The Critic's Delight: Constitutional Protection for Criticism." Journal of Popular Culture 21, no. 3 (December 1987): 47–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1987.2103_47.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Santosa, Puji. "KONDISI KRITIK SASTRA INDONESIA SEABAD H.B. JASSIN (Indonesia Literary Criticism in A Century of H. B. Jassin)." Kandai 13, no. 1 (August 24, 2017): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.26499/jk.v13i1.94.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This study aims to reveal and to describe the condition of Indonesian literary criticismin a century of H.B. Jassin (1917-2017). The research problem is how the condition of Indonesian literary criticism in a century of H.B. Jassin? The method used is the historical and descriptive method. The research proves that the condition of Indonesian literary criticism in a century of H.B. Jassin progressing quite encouraging on four genres of literary criticism, namely: (1)general literary criticism or practical literary criticism developed in printed media and electronic, (2) history of academic literary that thrives in academic research focusing on philology, (3) literature appreciation and interpretation that developes in the academic and scientific journal of literature, and (4) literary theory that developes in academic world as a basic reference for writing literature scientific papers. From these results it can be concluded that the condition of Indonesian literary criticism in a century of H.B. Jassin has never been stagnant or vacuum.

48

Adair-Toteff, Christopher. "Capitalism and criticism." History of the Human Sciences 26, no. 1 (February 2013): 128–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952695113476565.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Gusmian, Islah, and Mustaffa Abdullah (Corresponding Author). "Criticism of Social, Political, and Religious Problems in Indonesia: A Study on Al-Iklīl fī Ma‘ānī al-Tanzīl by Misbah Bin Zainil Mustafa (1917-1994)." Journal of Al-Tamaddun 18, no. 1 (June 19, 2023): 215–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.22452/jat.vol18no1.18.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Al-Iklīl fī Ma’ānī al-Tanzīl by Misbah bin Zainil Mustafa is a Qur’anic exegesis that was born from the pesantren tradition and was written during the New Order era under the leadership of President Soeharto. Through his exegesis, Misbah criticized social, political, and religious issues in Indonesia. The issues he highlighted, including how he formed his criticism, and its political as well as scholarly ramifications, are the focus of this study. Using descriptive, historical and explanatory methods, this article presents interesting and important findings. First, Misbah was an Indonesian ulama who started to publicly criticize the New Order regime’s policies and Muslims’ behaviors who were deemed inconsistent with Islamic values. In the midst of a hegemonic and repressive political system, Misbah’s attitude was a high risk and faced with political pressure from the New Order regime. Second, the use of Qur’anic exegesis as a medium for expressing criticism was an unusual move. During the New Order era, various criticisms of the government were raised through the mass media, art performances, literary works, or extra-parliamentary movements on the streets, but Misbah used Qur’anic exegesis as a medium for criticism; an out of the ordinary choice. Finally, from a political standpoint, because of his Al-Iklīl, Misbah was able to escape the political pressures of the hegemonic New Order government, and in term of academic contribution, he was able to establish a new tradition in the history of Qur’anic interpretation in Indonesia.

50

Frost, Charlotte. "Digital Critics: The Early History of Online Art Criticism." Leonardo 52, no. 1 (February 2019): 37–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01379.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Art critic Jerry Saltz is regarded as a pioneer of online art criticism by the mainstream press, yet the Internet has been used as a platform for art discussion for over 30 years. There have been studies of independent print-based arts publishing, online art production and electronic literature, but there have been no histories of online art criticism. In this article, the author provides an account of the first wave of online art criticism (1980–1995) to document this history and prepare the way for thorough evaluations of the changing form of art criticism after the Internet.

Статті в журналах з теми "History and criticism"

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями