Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Frontal sinus surgery / Статті в журналах

Статті в журналах з теми "Frontal sinus surgery"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Frontal sinus surgery.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 10 грудня 2022

Оновлено: 29 січня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Frontal sinus surgery".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Gerson, Robert M., Michael Friduss, and Richard C. Schultz. "Frontal Sinus Fracture Following Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Obliteration." Annals of Plastic Surgery 17, no. 2 (August 1986): 161–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198608000-00012.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Kim, Kyung Rae, and Seok Young Kang. "Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery." Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 57, no. 10 (2014): 657. http://dx.doi.org/10.3342/kjorl-hns.2014.57.10.657.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Okada, Masahiro, Koshiro Nakamura, and Taisuke Kobayashi. "Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery." Nihon Bika Gakkai Kaishi (Japanese Journal of Rhinology) 46, no. 4 (2007): 301–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.7248/jjrhi1982.46.4_301.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Lawson, William, and Yan Ho. "Open Frontal Sinus Surgery." Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 49, no. 4 (August 2016): 1067–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2016.03.027.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

May, Mark, and Barry Schaitkin. "Endonasal Frontal Sinus Surgery." Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 112, no. 5 (May 1995): P183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0194-5998(05)80493-0.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Mansour, H. A. K. A. "Double J stent of frontal sinus outflow tract in revision frontal sinus surgery." Journal of Laryngology & Otology 127, no. 1 (December 7, 2012): 43–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022215112002745.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

AbstractObjective:Frontal sinus surgery continues to challenge even the most experienced endoscopic sinus surgeon. Revision frontal sinus surgery is even more challenging. The use of stents in frontal sinus surgery has long been described, as an attempt to decrease the incidence of synechiae and stenosis.Method:This study included five patients who had previously undergone functional endoscopic sinus surgery but suffered recurrence of frontal sinusitis. Two had bilateral disease. Double J stents were used after endoscopic frontal sinusotomy. The stents were left in place for six months.Results:Four of the 5 patients (6 out of 7 sinuses) had a patent frontal outflow tract after 10 to 36 months’ follow up.Conclusion:Double J stents can be used as frontal sinus stents. They are well tolerated by patients, easily applied, and self-retaining with no need for sutures. The length of the stent can be altered according to the patient's anatomy and pathology.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Busch, Richard F. "Frontal Sinus Osteoma: Complete Removal via Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Frontal Sinus Trephination." American Journal of Rhinology 6, no. 4 (July 1992): 139–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/105065892781874612.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Endoscopic sinus surgery has improved our understanding of normal sinus physiology and enabled us to provide better surgical treatment of sinus disease. A method for removal of frontal sinus osteomas was sought that would be less invasive and more physiologic than the conventional osteoplastic flap procedure. Endoscopic sinus surgery has been combined with conventional frontal sinus trephination to achieve total osteoma removal while maintaining normal sinus mucociliary flow. Two successive patients have been treated in this manner with gratifying results.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Daniel, M., J. Watson, E. Hoskison, and A. Sama. "Frontal sinus models and onlay templates in osteoplastic flap surgery." Journal of Laryngology & Otology 125, no. 1 (September 13, 2010): 82–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022215110001799.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

AbstractObjective:Precise delineation of the extent of frontal sinus pneumatisation is a crucial step in osteoplastic flap frontal sinus surgery. The authors present a novel method of achieving this objective.Methods:First, models of the frontal area are generated using three-dimensional printing based on pre-operative computed tomography image data. These models are then used to create an onlay template of the frontal sinus, which is used intra-operatively.Results:In a series of 10 patients undergoing osteoplastic flap frontal sinus surgery, the described frontal sinus templates were consistently accurate to within 1 mm.Conclusion:Frontal sinus templates are potentially useful adjuncts to current techniques employed to guide frontal sinus surgery.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Marino, Michael J., and Edward D. McCoul. "Frontal Sinus Surgery: The State of the Art." International Journal of Head and Neck Surgery 7, no. 1 (2016): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10001-1257.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

ABSTRACT Aim: Review and describe the essential components of modern frontal sinus surgery. Background Frontal sinus surgery has evolved considerably over the last century, and advances in imaging, optics, and instrumentation have contributed to contemporary treatment paradigms. Outcomes assessment has had an important role in identifying indications for surgery and future areas of research. Review results Numerous advancements are part of modern frontal sinus surgery and the treatment of frontal sinusitis. Anatomic studies have revealed variations that are associated with disease and pose challenges for surgery. Open approaches remain relevant in situations of difficult disease or as part of combined approaches. Endoscopic surgery, however, is central to contemporary surgical management of frontal sinus disease. Evolving instrumentation and the development of new implantable devices are increasingly relevant in the endoscopic era. Outcomes research has refined indications for surgery and identifies areas for ongoing research. Conclusion State-of-the-art frontal sinus surgery is the product of significant evolution and advancement. Modern surgery is reflective of improved optics and new instrumentation, and the central role of endoscopic approaches in treating frontal sinus disease. Outcomes research has been essential for developing an evidenced-based approach to frontal sinus surgery. Clinical significance A review of the essential components of state-of-the-art frontal sinus surgery for the practicing otolaryngologist. How to cite this article Marino MJ, McCoul ED. Frontal Sinus Surgery: The State of the Art. Int J Head Neck Surg 2016;7(1): 5-12.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Hoshal, Steven G., Raj D. Dedhia, and E. Bradley Strong. "Frontal Sinus Fractures." Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America 30, no. 1 (February 2022): 71–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2021.08.006.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Podolsky, Dale J., and Kris S. Moe. "Frontal Sinus Fractures." Seminars in Plastic Surgery 35, no. 04 (October 7, 2021): 274–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736325.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

AbstractManagement of frontal sinus fractures is controversial with no universally accepted treatment protocol. Goals of management are to correct aesthetic deformity, preserve sinus function when it is deemed salvageable, prevent sequela related to the injury, and minimize complications associated with intervention. Studies suggest that frontal sinus injuries, including disruption of the nasofrontal outflow tract (NFOT), can be managed nonoperatively in many cases. Advances in the utilization of endoscopic techniques have led to an evolution in management that reduces the need for open procedures, which have increased morbidity compared with endoscopic approaches. We employ a minimally disruptive protocol that treats the majority of fractures nonoperatively with serial clinical and radiographic examinations to assess for sinus aeration. Surgical intervention is reserved for the most severely displaced and comminuted posterior table fractures and unsalvageable NFOTs utilizing endoscopic approaches whenever possible.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

McGraw-Wall, Becky. "Frontal Sinus Fractures." Facial Plastic Surgery 14, no. 01 (1998): 59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1085302.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Vilerbo, Fausto. "FRONTAL SINUS HYPERTROPHY." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 87, no. 5 (May 1991): 998–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199105000-00044.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Wolfe, S. Anthony. "FRONTAL SINUS HYPERTROPHY." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 88, no. 1 (July 1991): 174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199107000-00049.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Luce, Edward A. "Frontal Sinus Fractures." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 80, no. 4 (October 1987): 500–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198710000-00003.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Luce, Edward A. "Frontal Sinus Fractures." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 80, no. 4 (October 1987): 509–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198710000-00004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Wolfe, S. Anthony, and Peter Johnson. "Frontal Sinus Injuries." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 82, no. 5 (November 1988): 781–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198811000-00009.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Wolfe, S. Anthony, Peter Johnson, and Edward A. Luce. "Frontal Sinus Injuries." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 82, no. 5 (November 1988): 790–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198811000-00010.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Rohrich, Rod J., and Timothy J. Mickel. "Frontal Sinus Obliteration." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 95, no. 3 (March 1995): 580–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199503000-00026.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Mickel, Timothy J., Rod J. Rohrich, and Jack B. Robinson. "Frontal Sinus Obliteration." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 95, no. 3 (March 1995): 586–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199503000-00027.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Sherris, David A., and H. Bryan Neel. "FRONTAL SINUS OBLITERATIONREPL." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 96, no. 7 (December 1995): 1744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199512000-00043.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Eskandary, H., and H. Reihani Kermani. "Frontal sinus pneumocele." International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 28, no. 3 (June 1999): 179–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0901-5027(99)80133-7.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Silverman, Joshua B., Stacey T. Gray, and Nicolas Y. Busaba. "Role of Osteoplastic Frontal Sinus Obliteration in the Era of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery." International Journal of Otolaryngology 2012 (2012): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/501896.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Objective. Determining the indications for osteoplastic frontal sinus obliteration (OFSO) for the treatment of inflammatory frontal sinus disease.Study Design. Retrospective case series from a single tertiary care facility.Methods. Thirty-four patients who underwent OFSO for chronic frontal sinusitis () and frontal sinus mucocele () comprised our study group. Data reviewed included demographics, history of prior frontal sinus operation(s), imaging, diagnosis, and operative complications.Results. The age range was 19 to 76 years. Seventy percent of patients with chronic frontal sinusitis underwent OFSO as a salvage surgery after previous frontal sinus surgery failures, while 30% underwent OFSO as a primary surgery. For those in whom OFSO was a salvage procedure, the failed surgeries were endoscopic approaches to the frontal sinus (69%), Lynch procedure (12%), and OFSO outside this study period (19%). For patients with frontal sinus mucocele, 72% had OFSO as a first-line surgery. Within the total study population, 15% of patients presented for OFSO with history of prior obliteration, with a range of 3 to 30 years between representations.Conclusions. Osteoplastic frontal sinus obliteration remains a key surgical treatment for chronic inflammatory frontal sinus disease both as a salvage procedure and first-line surgical therapy.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Sonnenburg, Robert E., and Brent A. Senior. "Revision endoscopic frontal sinus surgery." Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 12, no. 1 (February 2004): 49–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00020840-200402000-00014.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Gur, �zer. "Isolated Frontal Sinus Surgery Pathologies." Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine 8, no. 3 (May 1, 2017): 235–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.4328/jcam.4809.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

Orlandi, Richard R., and David W. Kennedy. "Revision endoscopic frontal sinus surgery." Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 34, no. 1 (February 2001): 77–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70296-6.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Citardi, Martin J. "Computer-aided frontal sinus surgery." Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 34, no. 1 (February 2001): 111–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70299-1.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Tajudeen, Bobby A., and Nithin D. Adappa. "Instrumentation in Frontal Sinus Surgery." Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 49, no. 4 (August 2016): 945–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2016.03.018.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

DeConde, Adam S., and Timothy L. Smith. "Outcomes After Frontal Sinus Surgery." Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 49, no. 4 (August 2016): 1019–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2016.03.024.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Friedman, Michael, and Roee Landsberg. "Frontal sinus surgery: Endoscopic technique." Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 12, no. 2 (June 2001): 60–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/otot.2001.25030.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Sindwani, Raj, and Ralph Metson. "Image-Guided Frontal Sinus Surgery." Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 38, no. 3 (June 2005): 461–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2004.10.026.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Talbot, Andrew R. "Frontal Sinus Surgery in Children." Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 29, no. 1 (February 1996): 143–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0030-6665(20)30422-9.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Muntz, Harlan R. "Frontal sinus surgery in children." Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 5, no. 1 (March 1994): 27–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1043-1810(94)90019-1.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Ma, Yanhong, and Guolin Tan. "Modified Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery." Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 147, no. 2_suppl (August 2012): P113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599812451438a244.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Kuppersmith, Ronald B., and Hassan H. Ramadan. "History of Frontal Sinus Surgery." Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 126, no. 1 (January 1, 2000): 98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.126.1.98.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Balikian, Richard V., and Richard V. Smith. "Frontal sinus malignancies." Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 15, no. 1 (March 2004): 42–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.otot.2004.01.005.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Strong, E. Bradley. "Frontal sinus fractures." Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 19, no. 2 (June 2008): 151–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otot.2008.08.001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Ruggiero, Francis P., and Chad A. Zender. "Frontal sinus cranialization." Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 21, no. 2 (June 2010): 143–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otot.2010.03.001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Petersen, J., L. Gilain, A. Coutu, and N. Saroul. "Frontal sinus schwannoma." European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases 135, no. 3 (June 2018): 213–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2018.03.001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Sturgill, R. Luke, Alan Tate, and Jeb M. Justice. "Frontal Sinus Lesion." JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 143, no. 7 (July 1, 2017): 731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2016.4136.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Lai, J.-C., C.-K. Liu, M.-L. Chen, and M.-K. Chen. "Removal of frontal sinus keratoma solely via endoscopic sinus surgery." Journal of Laryngology & Otology 124, no. 10 (July 6, 2010): 1116–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s002221511000157x.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

AbstractObjectives:To present a patient with a frontal sinus keratoma removed solely via endoscopic sinus surgery, including presentation of characteristic computed tomography and magnetic resonance images; to discuss the differential diagnosis of this condition; and to report the current knowledge on and treatment of frontal sinus keratoma.Case report:A 53-year-old man presented to our department with a 10-month history of rhinorrhoea and postnasal drip. After computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies, the patient underwent surgery utilising a modified Lothrop procedure. An extensive soft tissue lesion was removed from the frontal sinus. Histological examination revealed a lamellated cluster of keratinous material. The pathological diagnosis was keratoma of the frontal sinus. There was no recurrence of keratoma over a two-year follow-up period.Conclusions:Following review of the English language literature, we believe this case report to represent the first successful application of a modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure for resection of an extensive frontal sinus keratoma. Thus, the applications of endoscopic sinus surgery may be expanded to include frontal sinus keratoma removal.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

McCoul, Edward D., and Kiranya E. Tipirneni. "The Bifurcated Frontal Sinus." OTO Open 2, no. 1 (January 2018): 2473974X1876487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473974x18764879.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Objectives Frontal sinus anatomy is complex, and multiple variations of ethmoid pneumatization have been described that affect the frontal outflow tract. In addition, the lumen proper of the frontal sinus may exist as 2 separate parallel cavities that share an ipsilateral outflow tract. This variant has not been previously described and may have implications for surgical management. Study Design Case series. Setting Tertiary rhinology practice. Subjects and Methods Cases with radiographic and intraoperative findings of separate parallel tracts within a unilateral frontal sinus were identified from a consecutive series of 186 patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery between May 2015 and July 2016. Data were recorded including sinusitis phenotype, coexisting frontal cells, and extent of surgery. Results Ten patients (5.4%) were identified with computed tomography scans demonstrating bifurcation of the frontal sinus into distinct medial and lateral lumens. All cases were treated with Draf 2a or 2b frontal sinusotomy with partial removal of the common wall to create a unified ipsilateral frontal ostium. Eleven sides had a coexisting ipsilateral agger nasi cell, 7 had a supra-agger cell, 8 had a suprabullar cell, and 1 had a frontal septal cell. There were no significant complications. Conclusion The bifurcated frontal sinus is an anatomic variant that the surgeon should recognize to optimize surgical outcomes. Failure to do so may result in incomplete clearance of the sinus and residual disease. The bifurcated sinus may occur with other types of frontal sinus cells and may be safely treated with endoscopic techniques.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

Hahn, Samuel, James N. Palmer, Michael T. Purkey, David W. Kennedy, and Alexander G. Chiu. "Indications for External Frontal Sinus Procedures for Inflammatory Sinus Disease." American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy 23, no. 3 (May 2009): 342–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3327.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Background In the modern age of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), there is an undefined role for external approaches in the treatment of inflammatory disease. This study examines the frontal sinus surgery practices of three experienced rhinologists with a focus on those who underwent an external approach. Our goal was to characterize these patients and propose indications for the use of an external approach alone or in combination with functional ESS (FESS) for frontal sinus inflammatory disease. Methods A retrospective review was performed of frontal sinus procedures performed for inflammatory disease at one institution from 2004 to 2007. Results Seven hundred seventeen procedures were performed, 38 (5.3%) of which were external alone (14 procedures) or in combination with FESS (24 procedures). Osteoplastic flap with obliteration (12/14) made up the majority of external alone procedures and the most common indication was neo-osteogenesis of the frontal recess. Trephination was the most common external adjunct to FESS (12/24), and often was performed for type 3 frontal recess cells or in the initial management of acute frontal bone osteomyelitis (FOM). Twenty-eight of 38 (74%) patients had a history of previous surgery. Of the 10 patients with no history of previous surgery, 6 (60%) had an external adjunct for frontal recess neo-osteogenesis. There were no major complications but 9/38 (23.7%) patients required revision surgery for persistent/recurrent symptoms. Conclusion External approaches alone and in combination with FESS are predominantly secondary to neo-osteogenesis of the frontal recess. Factors associated with neo-osteogenesis include previous trauma, endoscopic surgery, and FOM. External frontal sinus surgery provides adequate management of inflammatory disease but has a high revision rate.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Hunter, B., S. Silva, R. Youngs, A. Saeed, and V. Varadarajan. "Long-term stenting for chronic frontal sinus disease: case series and literature review." Journal of Laryngology & Otology 124, no. 11 (May 20, 2010): 1216–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022215110001052.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

AbstractObjective:The frontal sinus outflow tract consists anatomically of narrow channels prone to stenosis. Following both endonasal and external approach surgery, up to 30 per cent of patients suffer post-operative re-stenosis of the frontal sinus outflow tract, with recurrent frontal sinus disease. This paper proposes the surgical placement of a long-term frontal sinus stent to maintain fronto-nasal patency, as an alternative to more aggressive surgical procedures such as frontal sinus obliteration and modified Lothrop procedures.Design:We present a series of three patients with frontal sinus disease and significant co-morbidity, the latter making extensive surgery a significant health risk. We also review the relevant literature and discuss the use of long-term frontal sinus stenting.Results:These three cases were successfully treated with long-term frontal sinus stenting. Stents remained in situ for a period ranging from 48 to over 60 months.Conclusion:Due to the relatively high failure rates for both endonasal and external frontal sinus surgery, with a high post-operative incidence of frontal sinus outflow tract re-stenosis, long-term stenting is a useful option in carefully selected patients.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Khan, Mohammed A., Waleed A. Alshareef, Osama A. Marglani, and Islam R. Herzallah. "Outcome and Complications of Frontal Sinus Stenting: A Case Presentation and Literature Review." Case Reports in Otolaryngology 2020 (August 26, 2020): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8885870.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Introduction. Frontal sinus surgery remains challenging to manage because of its complex anatomy and narrow outflow tract. A number of studies suggest the success of frontal sinus stenting to reduce postoperative complications in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. However, failure and complications of frontal sinus stenting may occur. Method. We present a case of frontal sinus stenting with migration of the stent and erosion of the lamina papyracea together with a granulomatous reaction around the stent. PubMed and Medline search was also conducted to study the current evidence on frontal sinus stenting benefits and complications. Results. Still there are no guidelines or universally accepted indications for the use of frontal sinus stenting in the literature. A limited number of studies suggest the success of frontal sinus stenting to reduce postoperative stenosis in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. However, failure and complications of frontal sinus stenting may occur. Infection, pain, edema, and stent obstruction may also occur. Our case report also highlights the potential of orbital complications as well as the consequences of inducing a granulomatous reaction. Conclusion. The value of frontal sinus stenting is still a subject of debate. Complications of frontal sinus stenting are not uncommon and thus necessitate regular follow-up.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

Graziani, Jade, Martin Penicaud, Djamel Hazbri, Patrick Dessi, Justin Michel, and Thomas Radulesco. "Transpalpebral Frontal Sinus Septectomy: Feasibility and Results." American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy 34, no. 3 (January 8, 2020): 375–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1945892419899351.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Background Transpalpebral frontal septectomy (TFS) can be performed for unilateral frontal sinusitis drainage (into the contralateral healthy frontal sinus) or to provide access to the lateral extent of the contralateral frontal sinus. This procedure has demonstrated its usefulness in several problematic situations for the endoscopic surgeon. Objective The main objective of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of TFS. Secondary objectives were to define outcomes, early and late complications, contraindications, and failure rates of the TFS. Methods We reviewed patient demographics including age and gender, indication for frontal septectomy, prior surgeries, failure rates and necessity of revision surgery, early and late complications, and the side of the approach (ipsi- or contralateral to the frontal sinus pathology). Twenty patients who had undergone TFS were included. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the surgical indication: group 1—TFS performed for unilateral frontal sinusitis to drain a frontal sinus in the contralateral frontal sinus; and group 2—TFS performed to provide access to the lateral extent of the contralateral frontal sinus. Scarring was assessed using the SCAR-Q questionnaire. Results TFS was performed on all patients in Groups 1 and 2 (success rate = 100%). No patients had recurrence of the pathology 6 months after surgery (0%). No patient needed revision surgery (0%). One complication (frontal hypoesthesia) was reported 6 months after surgery. Mean SCAR-Q score was 99.3 ± 2.5 (min = 91/100, max = 100/100). Conclusion TFS was feasible for all patients in this study. This procedure permits drainage of the frontal sinus and gives access to the lateral extent of the contralateral frontal sinus, without visible scarring, and with few lasting complications. Authorization to conduct this study was obtained from the Ethical Committee of our institution (APHM, n°2019_65).

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Carter, Kenny B., David M. Poetker, and John S. Rhee. "Sinus Preservation Management for Frontal Sinus Fractures in the Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Era: A Systematic Review." Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 3, no. 3 (September 2010): 141–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262957.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

We systematically reviewed the existing literature supporting the efficacy and safety of sinus preservation management for frontal sinus fractures in the modern era of endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. A systematic review of the English literature for the targeted objective was conducted using the PubMed database between January 1995 and August 2008. The PubMed database was queried using two major search terms of frontal sinus fracture or frontal sinus injury along with manual review of citations within bibliographies. Citations acquired from the primary search were filtered and relevant abstracts were identified that merited full review. Articles were identified that included any cohort of patients with frontal sinus fractures involving the frontal sinus outflow tract or posterior wall with sinus preservation management. A total of 231 citations were generated, and 56 abstracts were identified as potentially relevant articles. Sixteen articles merited full review, with seven articles meeting inclusion criteria for sinus preservation. There were 515 total patients in the studies with 350 patients managed with frontal sinus preservation. Similar short-term complications and effectiveness were found between fractures managed with sinus preservation and those with traditional management. Sinus preservation appears to be a safe and effective management strategy for select frontal sinus fractures. More transparent reporting of management strategies for individual cases or cohorts is needed. A standardized algorithm and categorization framework for future studies are proposed. Longer-term follow-up and larger prospective studies are necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of sinus preservation protocols.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

48

Choi, Kevin J., Bora Chang, Charles R. Woodard, David B. Powers, Jeffrey R. Marcus, and Liana Puscas. "Survey of Current Practice Patterns in the Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures." Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 10, no. 2 (June 2017): 106–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1599196.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The management of frontal sinus fractures has evolved in the endoscopic era. The development of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has been incorporated into management algorithms proposed by otolaryngologists, but the extent of its influence on plastic surgeons and oral and maxillofacial surgeons is heretofore unknown. A cross-sectional survey was performed to assess the practice pattern variations in frontal sinus fracture management across multiple surgical disciplines. A total of 298 surveys were reviewed. 33.5% were facial plastic surgeons with otolaryngology training, 25.8% general otolaryngologists, 25.5% plastic surgeons, and 15.1% oral and maxillofacial surgeons. 74.8% of respondents practiced in an academic setting. 61.7% felt endoscopic sinus surgery changed their management of frontal sinus fractures. 91.8% of respondents favored observation for uncomplicated, nondisplaced frontal sinus outflow tract fractures. 36.4% favored observation and 35.9% favored endoscopic sinus surgery for uncomplicated, displaced frontal sinus outflow tract fractures. For complicated, displaced frontal sinus outflow tract fractures, obliteration was more frequently favored by plastic surgeons and oral and maxillofacial surgeons than those with otolaryngology training. The utility of FESS in managing frontal sinus fractures appears to be recognized across multiple surgical disciplines.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Payne, Spencer C. "Editorial: Frontal sinus." Journal of Neurosurgery 116, no. 3 (March 2012): 529–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.9.jns111378.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Ji, Junfeng, Mei Zhou, Zeqing Li, Tianyou Wang, You Cheng, and Qiuping Wang. "Frontal Sinus Surgery Anterior to the Ethmoid Bulla." International Surgery 98, no. 2 (May 1, 2013): 149–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.9738/cc37.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract The frontal sinus surgery is difficult to perform but the ethmoid bulla is a relative, constant landmark in the middle turbinate that can improve the surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, security, and predominance of approaches to the frontal sinus via the route anterior to the ethmoid bulla. The data from 370 endoscopic frontal sinus surgery cases from our center were integrated and retrospectively analyzed. Three hundred twenty-nine patients underwent frontal sinus surgery via the route anterior to the ethmoid bulla. An additional 27 patients underwent frontal sinus surgery with mini-trephination, 13 patients with the Draf II procedure, and 1 patient had applied MELP (modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure). No serious complications occurred; however, there were 3 cases of eyelid ecchymosis and 1 case of anterior ethmoid artery bleeding. In all, 319 patients (86.2%) were cured, an improvement was noted in 36 of the patients (9.7%), and there was no improvement in 15 patients (4.1%). Frontal sinus surgery via the route anterior to the ethmoid bulla is valid, relatively safe, and can be applied in most cases involving frontal disease.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!