Добірка наукової літератури з теми "External validity bias"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Зміст
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "External validity bias".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "External validity bias"
Lei, Yang, James C. Bezdek, Simone Romano, Nguyen Xuan Vinh, Jeffrey Chan, and James Bailey. "Ground truth bias in external cluster validity indices." Pattern Recognition 65 (May 2017): 58–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2016.12.003.
Повний текст джерелаAndrews, Isaiah, and Emily Oster. "A simple approximation for evaluating external validity bias." Economics Letters 178 (May 2019): 58–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.02.020.
Повний текст джерелаCipriani, Andrea, Marianna Purgato, and Corrado Barbui. "Why internal and external validity of experimental studies are relevant for clinical practice?" Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 18, no. 2 (June 2009): 101–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1121189x00000968.
Повний текст джерелаMayeda, Elizabeth Rose, Eleanor Hayes-Larson, and Hailey Banack. "Who’s in and Who’s Out? Selection Bias in Aging Research." Innovation in Aging 4, Supplement_1 (December 1, 2020): 822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2998.
Повний текст джерелаMoore, Randall P., and W. Douglas Robinson. "ARTIFICIAL BIRD NESTS, EXTERNAL VALIDITY, AND BIAS IN ECOLOGICAL FIELD STUDIES." Ecology 85, no. 6 (June 2004): 1562–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-0088.
Повний текст джерелаBell, Stephen H., Robert B. Olsen, Larry L. Orr, and Elizabeth A. Stuart. "Estimates of External Validity Bias When Impact Evaluations Select Sites Nonrandomly." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 38, no. 2 (June 2016): 318–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0162373715617549.
Повний текст джерелаKhorsan, Raheleh, and Cindy Crawford. "External Validity and Model Validity: A Conceptual Approach for Systematic Review Methodology." Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014 (2014): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/694804.
Повний текст джерелаHuddleston, R. Joseph. "Think Ahead: Cost Discounting and External Validity in Foreign Policy Survey Experiments." Journal of Experimental Political Science 6, no. 02 (November 19, 2018): 108–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/xps.2018.22.
Повний текст джерелаHe, Yuanda, Qi Zhou, Sheng Lin, and Liping Zhao. "Validity Evaluation Method Based on Data Driving for On-Line Monitoring Data of Transformer under DC-Bias." Sensors 20, no. 15 (August 3, 2020): 4321. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20154321.
Повний текст джерелаLarrabee, Glenn J. "Performance Validity and Symptom Validity in Neuropsychological Assessment." Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 18, no. 4 (May 8, 2012): 625–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1355617712000240.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "External validity bias"
Natter, Martin, and Markus Feurstein. "Correcting for CBC model bias. A hybrid scanner data - conjoint model." SFB Adaptive Information Systems and Modelling in Economics and Management Science, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2001. http://epub.wu.ac.at/880/1/document.pdf.
Повний текст джерелаSeries: Report Series SFB "Adaptive Information Systems and Modelling in Economics and Management Science"
"Assessment of bias, inter-rater reliability, and external validity in the use of mobile phone surveys for monitoring bed net coverage and use indicators in Tanzania." Tulane University, 2020.
Знайти повний текст джерелаIntroduction: Mass distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) is a core malaria prevention strategy that has proven to be efficacious and cost-effective in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Monitoring ITN coverage, use, and access has relied on household surveys which are expensive and time consuming. Recently, mobile phone survey (MPS) methodologies have emerged as a comparatively inexpensive alternative to large scale population-based household surveys and are becoming increasingly attractive considering the rapid growth trend of mobile phone ownership in LMIC. The overall research objective of the current body of work is to determine if interactive voice response (IVR) MPS can serve to rapidly and reliably monitor ITN indicators in LMIC. Methods: Data collection used either household surveys or IVR MPS – all of which included a module on bed net ownership, access, and use. The first study aim analyzed data from the last five nationally representative household surveys conducted in Tanzania in order to assess and quantify the potential for bias as a result of using MPS over traditional household surveys in estimating bed net coverage indicators. The conceptual design compares surveyed households reporting mobile phone ownership, and thus the potential for participation in an MPS, against all other households regardless of mobile phone ownership over the course of a 10-year period. The second study aim was designed as an individual-level test of inter-rater reliability of bed net indicator estimates between a face-to-face household survey and a follow-up IVR MPS to these same households. The third study aim was designed as a population-level test of external validity comparing ITN coverage indicator results from a nationally representative random-digit dial (RDD) IVR MPS and the malaria module from a nationally representative household survey. Results: Household mobile phone ownership increased by over 50 percentage points from 28.1% in 2007-08 to 81.5% in 2017. In more recent years, survey results show that bias in measuring ITN coverage indicators is minimal under a scenario that compares estimates calculated from DHS surveys for all households against those households reporting mobile phone ownership. For the four ITN coverage indicators assessed using the 2017 MIS data, national-level measures of bias did not exceed a 2.5-percentage point difference for mobile phone-owning households compared to the overall sample of households. Further, regional measures of bias for these same indicators rarely exceeded ± 3-percentage points in 2017. The second study aim, which compared bed net indicator estimates between the small-scale a household survey and a follow-up MPS, found that agreement between survey modalities was variable depending on the indicator, but was highest for household ownership of at least one bed net of any type (Gwet’s AC1 = 0.8). There was low agreement for indicators calculated from counts reflected in the low concurrent validity of key data elements used to calculate bed net use and access indicators. The third study aim comparing bed net indicator estimates from a national household and IVR RDD survey found that the external validity was variable but, in general, the RDD MPS tended to underestimate bed net indicators at the national level. Differences in bed net indicator estimates ranged from 3 to 23-percentage points but overall, it appeared that indicators non-specific to net treatment status demonstrated less bias in measurement through the RDD MPS when compared against the nationally representative household survey. Conclusions: According to estimates, mobile phone ownership has increased drastically in Tanzania since 2007 suggesting that MPS could presently be used to track population-level indicators of ITN coverage, among others. The IVR MPS methodology we applied has the potential to serve as a mechanism that can accurately estimate certain bed net indicators – primarily those that would make use of data elements derived from binary response options. Their use could be scaled to much larger RDD surveys to collect discrete packets of information. At a total cost of approximately US$22,000 (2017 USD) to obtain nationally and regionally representative bed net indicator estimates, the cost-for-information benefit is promising, but more research needs to be done to optimize question sets in order to ensure RDD survey results are able to repeatedly track with face-to-face household survey results.
1
Matt Worges
Книги з теми "External validity bias"
Elwood, Mark. Selection of subjects for study. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199682898.003.0005.
Повний текст джерелаElwood, Mark. The diagnosis of causation. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199682898.003.0010.
Повний текст джерелаElwood, Mark. Critical Appraisal of Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199682898.001.0001.
Повний текст джерела