Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Écosystème d'innovation"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Écosystème d'innovation".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Écosystème d'innovation":
Retour, Didier. "Minalogic est un véritable écosystème d'innovation. Entretien avec Nicolas Leterrier." Revue française de gestion 35, no. 190 (January 30, 2009): 169–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.3166/rfg.190.169-177.
Ronteau, Sébastien. "Embrasser la condition de firme-pivot : dynamiques d'innovation de Dassault Systèmes dans son écosystème d'affaires." Management & Avenir 28, no. 8 (2009): 196. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/mav.028.0196.
Ben Letaifa, Soumaya, and Yves Rabeau. "Évolution des relations coopétitives et rationalités des acteurs dans les écosystèmes d'innovation." Management international 16, no. 2 (April 4, 2012): 57–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1008708ar.
Fixari, Daniel, and Frédérique Pallez. "Bonnes et mauvaises complexités : des illusions d'optique ? Le cas des écosystèmes d'innovation." Annales des Mines - Gérer et comprendre 116, no. 2 (2014): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/geco.116.0017.
Дисертації з теми "Écosystème d'innovation":
Lerch-Malherbe, Magali. "La trajectoire d'innovation de la naissance d'un écosystème d'affaires : une approche multiniveaux : Le cas du développement des services mobiles NFC." Caen, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014CAEN0507.
The open innovation movement, which has been emerging since the early 21th century, is at the origin of the emergence of business ecosystems (BE). They integrate players who have their competences and their roles co-evolving to manage the challenges of each stage of their life cycles. But few studies consider this dynamic dimension of the BE and especially its first stage: the birth. Specifically, it evolves along an innovation trajectory which leads the actions to define a new offer. Based on qualitative research and on process approach, this study focuses on the case of the emergence of a business ecosystem in the field of contactless mobile services. We conduct a multilevel analysis through the global process of this BE's innovation trajectory and the local process of the experimental projects which are articulated along this path. We are 'coking at these two processes as places, which include a managerial logic contributing to build key competences and a socio-political logic providing power strategies between players and their roles definition. Our results focus on two analytical levels. At the global level, the main challenge is to define a shared collective vision. It revolves around two dimensions: a technical dimension (the dominant design) and an economic dimension (the business model). It is formalized through key competences building which, in turn, defines the roles of the members. In this dynamic, competences related to "use context sensitivity" are crucial: they enable BE's intégration until the trajectory lock-in, then its efficiency through the generation of new alternatives which may lead to some bifurcations (positive ambiguity). At the local level, experimental projects promote the confrontation of individuals' strategies. They generate the building of competences which capitalize along the trajectory or question the collective vision
Bigault, de Casanove Alice de. "Stimuler les relations d'innovation ouverte entre les grandes entreprises et les startups. Application à l’écosystème français." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université de Lorraine, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020LORR0268.
"The whale has nothing to learn from plankton", this is how one could summarize the approach of the large groups vis-a-vis startups during the 20th century... However, following the 2008 crisis, the innovation policy of large groups integrates an approach to startups. The rapid pace of business evolution is stretching typical large corporation strategies. Hence, large corporations must seek to adopt an agile approach; borrowed from the startup approach. Rather than changing their own playbook; large groups aim to embrace open innovation as a way to evolve and meet any new business context. As a matter of fact, startups and large corporations have opposed strategies: startups are looking for product-market fit and exponential growth whereas large corporations are focused on optimization and profitability development. Yet, large corporations propose more and more open innovation plans targeting startups. In this thesis, we propose an analysis of the current practices in the corporate world to assess this apparent paradox. Thus, our central research question is: How to show the adequation between the needs of a startup and an open innovation plan of a large corporation by proposing a framework for a systematic and exhaustive analysis of the relationships between large corporations and startups? • What are the startups' needs? Are they evolving as the startup becomes more mature? • How to design tools for a systematic and exhaustive understanding of the open innovation plans and the support provided? • Is there an approach to identify the adequation between startup's needs and large corporation supports? We propose a maturity-grid-based framework to analyze the expected added value of open innovation measures proposed by large corporations. We build our grid on two scales: 1) on the type of engagement and relationships between large corporations and startups; 2) on the domains that the development of a startup should consider under the lens of the new ISO standards on innovation management ISO56000 series. We implement this framework for the French ecosystem (CAC 40 companies) with French startups survey and interviews of large corporations out of CAC 40 group. Finally, we validate our approach and findings with external stakeholders to our research. We have sketched several aspects of the large companies and startups interactions. Such interactions will increase in the near future, leading to new modes of cooperation especially after COVID-19 crisis. This work could serve as a basis for their future study
Tremblay, Nathalie. "Living labs as innovation intermediaries : symphonic orchestration of innovation dynamics in open innovation ecosystems." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Strasbourg, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023STRAB012.
The dissertation defines the dynamics of innovation through the lens of living labs, theorising on how these intermediaries, can effectively orchestrate innovation ecosystems through open innovation initiatives. The study offers numerous theoretical contributions on innovation for managerial practice and public policies, identifying key mechanisms and best governance practices, ensuring that sociotechnological and ecosystem perspectives are included in innovation strategies that create shared value outcomes. The thesis provides an opportunity to consider the role played by communities within the innovation ecosystem through the theory of the Commons (Ostrom, 1990), in an evolutionary perspective
Parisot, Xavier. "Influence des logiques d'innovation ouvertes sur l'émergence des écosystèmes d'affaires dans les Bioindustries françaises." Thesis, Paris, CNAM, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015CNAM0996/document.
Biotechnologies mobilized today in bio-industries require skills that companies can no longer control alone. The development of disruptive innovations involves a multidisciplinary approach requiring the intervention of several industrial sectors that is opposed to proprietary innovation logic. Transversality necessary for these collaborations between private companies and public sectors and or between industries from different business sectors profoundly changes the nature of organizational models chosen by firms. Among all the models adopted, the business ecosystem (BE) occupies a more and more central place in bio-industries. The optimization of the associated logical innovation has become a challenge that even the institutions are trying to respond by supporting the adoption of open innovation logics (OI) and the development of BE. Yet, the nature of these two notions is still discussed and there theoretical combination remains poorly understood. Although case studies show that BE support their development on OI in knowledge based industries, nature and implementation sequence of underlying concepts remain to be determined. Moreover, the debate remains regarding the ontological and epistemological limits of OI and BE notions. This thesis seeks to clarify these elements and determines what role is played by the OI in the emergence of BE in the French bio-industries.The ontological analysis of BE notion reveals the purely metaphorical transpositions made by Moore from ecology to establish its definition. Therefore, the analogical approach supported by a part of the scientific community can't be applied to establish the epistemological limits of BE notion. The ontological nature of OI notion remains uncertain. Nature of inter-organizational information flows and dynamic capabilities of firms are jointly mobilized. This uncertainty is not permissive to the achievement of an epistemological analysis, therefore dynamic capacities here were chosen as theoretical foundations of the OI notion. The epistemological analysis of the development of BE notion demonstrates the application of a recursive loop in its construction. Moreover, it reveals the existence of a substantive theory behind the BE notion, theory which mobilizes a sequence of concepts implemented successively in the emergence of BE. The OI is one of mobilized notions.The epistemological posture adopted in this thesis is that of critical realism. It allows the inclusion of the recursive loop. It is suitable for the approach by grounded theories. It integrates intrinsic and extrinsic circumstances justifying how generating mechanisms are activated. It allows the formulation of founding ontological assumptions. This choice preserves Moore's implicit epistemological posture, legitimizes the value of its grounded approach, assumes the ontological assumption made about the foundations of OI notion, and takes into account both environmental and organizational factors justifying the emergence of BE. The resulting methodology is qualitative. It goes through a comparison of two case studies based on secondary data analysis. Contextual factors of each case are correlated to reveal the generative mechanisms justifying the role of OI in the emergence of BE.The results confirm the implementation sequence of concepts proposed by Moore in the emergence of BE in the French bio-industries. They precise the place of OI in this sequence by specifying its role in the transition from collaboration to co-evolution of firms within BE. They confirm that BE is not an organizational model in itself, but an inter-organizational stance promoting the adoption of appropriate models
Книги з теми "Écosystème d'innovation":
Laperche, Blandine, Marcos Lima, Éric Seulliet, and Brigitte Trousse. Les écosystèmes d'innovation. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.
Частини книг з теми "Écosystème d'innovation":
Nedelec, Elodie, and Elodie Nedelec. "Chapitre 15. Écosystème apprenant, innovant : l’exemple de GERME." In Les écosystèmes d'innovation, 261–80. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.0261.
Grab, Erik. "Chapitre 7. Michelin développe l’innovation en écosystème." In Les communautés d'innovation, 121. EMS Editions, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ems.saraz.2017.01.0121.
Perrin Boulonne, Hélène. "Chapitre 10. Écosystème du financement en capital dans le territoire de Lyon, Grenoble, Chambéry." In Les écosystèmes d'innovation, 183–97. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.0183.
Baron, Xavier, and Nicolas Cugier. "Chapitre 8. Un écosystème d’innovation pour accompagner par la R&D le secteur du Facility Management." In Les écosystèmes d'innovation, 157–75. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.0157.
Laperche, Blandine. "Chapitre 4. Les écosystèmes d’innovation au service du capital savoir des entreprises." In Les écosystèmes d'innovation, 97–117. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.0097.
Trousse, Brigitte, Bérangère L. Szostak, Antonella Tufano, and Elodie Nedelec. "Chapitre 11. Écosystèmes d’innovation ouverte « nouvelle génération » : Living Labs, communs d’innovation et organisation apprenante." In Les écosystèmes d'innovation, 207–25. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.0207.
Plassat, Gabriel. "Chapitre 16. Les bénéfices des communs et de l’open source pour les écosystèmes d’innovation – la Fabrique des Mobilités." In Les écosystèmes d'innovation, 281–90. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.0281.
Dubocage, Emmanuelle. "Chapitre 9. Les relations entrepreneurs / capital-risqueurs : un éclairage théorique." In Les écosystèmes d'innovation, 177–82. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.0177.
Dupont, Laurent, Eric Seulliet, and Patrick Duvaut. "Chapitre 17. ValYooTrust : Plateforme de confiance et incitative pour l’innovation collaborative." In Les écosystèmes d'innovation, 291–312. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.0291.
Vérilhac, Isabelle. "Chapitre 13. Design Creative City Living Lab : le Living Lab de la Cité du design de Saint-Étienne." In Les écosystèmes d'innovation, 237–49. L'Harmattan, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/har.laper.2019.01.0237.
Звіти організацій з теми "Écosystème d'innovation":
Bourdeau, Simon, Thibault Coulon, Amandine Pascal, and Mathieu Templier. Innovation ouverte et écosystème d’innovation : Implications pour le secteur public. CIRANO, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.54932/nibf5951.