Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Diritto degli affari"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Diritto degli affari".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Diritto degli affari"
Rossi, Nello. "Diritto penale dell'economia e tendenze della criminalitŕ degli affari." QUESTIONE GIUSTIZIA, no. 4 (September 2012): 85–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/qg2012-004006.
Повний текст джерелаZabłocka, Maria. "Romanistyka polska od 1980 roku." Prawo Kanoniczne 37, no. 1-2 (June 15, 1994): 189–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/pk.1994.37.1-2.07.
Повний текст джерелаGuido, Alpa. "Responsabilitŕ sociale dell'impresa, enti non profit, etica degli affari." ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, no. 2 (January 2012): 199–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/ed2011-002001.
Повний текст джерелаValas, Igor. "I registri dei titolari effettivi alla luce del D.M. 11 marzo 2022, n. 55: diritti di accesso e diritti di opposizione." settembre-ottobre, no. 5 (October 6, 2022): 986–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.35948/1590-5586/2022.199.
Повний текст джерелаBenini, Caterina. "La localizzacione dell’illecito concorrenziale nel regime di Bruxelles: riflessioni alla luce della Sentenza FLYLAL II della Corte di Giustizia dell’Unione Europea = The localization of antitrust torts underthe Brussels regime: reflections in the light of the Judgment FLYLAL II of the Court of Justice of the European Union." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 11, no. 1 (March 11, 2019): 693. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2019.4641.
Повний текст джерелаSIMÕES, Patricia Maria Uchôa, and Mariana Uchôa Simões BARBOSA. "Bebês em creches nas zonas rurais do Brasil." INTERRITÓRIOS 6, no. 10 (April 14, 2020): 264. http://dx.doi.org/10.33052/inter.v6i10.244906.
Повний текст джерелаComite, Ubaldo. "Responsabilità sociale e gestione etica dell'impresa tra profitto e primato della persona umana." E-Theologos. Theological revue of Greek Catholic Theological Faculty 1, no. 1 (April 1, 2010): 21–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10154-010-0003-9.
Повний текст джерелаTassani, Thomas. "L'Agenzia delle entrate di fronte al trust." gennaio-febbraio, no. 1 (February 3, 2022): 17–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.35948/1590-5586/2022.46.
Повний текст джерела"Osservatorio italiano: Documenti ; Leggi, regolamenti e decreti statali." DIRITTO, IMMIGRAZIONE E CITTADINANZA, no. 2 (July 2010): 253–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/diri2010-002019.
Повний текст джерелаPerra, Livio. "Il diritto è nei sogni." RIPS: Revista de Investigaciones Políticas y Sociológicas 16, no. 1 (June 26, 2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.15304/rips.16.1.3847.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Diritto degli affari"
Santangelo, Marco. "Etica degli Affari." Doctoral thesis, Università di Catania, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10761/1634.
Повний текст джерелаPELLEGATTA, STEFANO. "La solidarietà passiva nel diritto degli affari: nuovi profili applicativi." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10281/20370.
Повний текст джерелаSARACENI, BARBARA. "La revoca dell’amministratore di s.r.l. a confronto con l’ordinamento tedesco." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2108/202141.
Повний текст джерелаThe purpose of this legal research is the examination of the discipline of the director’s revocation of Italian limited Company “s.r.l.”, regulated by art. 2476 Italian Civil Code, after the corporate reform of 2003. Such a matter has been subject of numerous interpretations by the Doctrine and Jurisprudence, as it raises many systematic problems not yet resolved. The Art. 2476 c.c. is one of the most controversial points of Italian corporate law; the legislator of the reform, in order to maintain the s.r.l. autonomy, has joined more legal institutions in the same article, with the intention of emphasizing the partner’s figure in the social contract, the organization and management of company. Making a parallel with the same German rules, more detailed and more systematic than the Italian ones, it is possible to notice some key differences and thus take any possible ideas for future reforms. The thesis consists of six chapters. The first chapter (“Historical and normative context”) is dedicated to the introduction of the birth of “s.r.l.” and the “GmbH”. After a brief history, there is a general comparison between the company types of two different systems, analyzing the salient features of both the company reforms: the Italian one, relative to s.r.l., in 2003; the German one, relative to the GmbH, in 2008 (the so-called Law MoMiG), with particular care of the responsibility in both the legal systems. The topic of the second chapter (“Directors’ duties and responsibilities”) is the issue of legal responsibility management activity, which plays a key role in the governance of Italian and German limited liability company and it is prodromal to remove the director from his office, if he’s soiled himself with acts of mismanagement. There is an overview of the ABSTRACT II Art. 2476, comma 1, c.c. with respect s.r.l. and § 46 GmbHG of the German system, analyzing the directors’ duties, diligence executable and the legal consequences of their violation. The third chapter (“Partner’s control rights”) is dedicated to information and consulting rights granted to the s.r.l. and GmbH partners, respectively by art. 2476, comma 2, c.c. and by § 51a GmbHG. Italian law sets the topic “Partner’s control right” in the rule with regard to the responsibility and to the removal of the director, who is guilty of acts of maladministration. For s.r.l. a novelty is represented not only by the more wideness of the aforesaid control rights, but above all by the title attributed to each member, regardless of the share capital owned. Therefore the new arrangement of controls predominantly is left to the partner’s individual initiative, approaching the s.r.l. to the model of the individual companies. Here the procedures are analyzed to the exercise of the right to information and consultation of both the partners, s.r.l. and GmbH, even by trusted professionals. The directors’ power, then, is examined to withhold the release of the requested informations, in order to protect the social interest from the disclosure of corporate data deemed private. In the fourth chapter (“The action of social responsibility and the removal of the s.r.l. director”) the liability action is analyzed towards the director, guilty of misconduct, in relation to precautionary action of removal, in conformity with the Art. 2476, comma 3, c.c. In this case the legislator has abolished the previous reference to the s.p.a. and he has introduced “also” the possibility to remove the individual director by a preliminary injunction. Extensive review is dedicated to the director’s diligence and to his exemption of liability, especially with regard to the manifestation of dissent. The same chapter examines the not so peaceful question of the procedural substitution, or if the individual s.r.l. partner acts in the proceedings in his own name, but for a right of the company, that becomes necessary joinder in the liability action. Then, other procedural aspects of the liability action are examined, such as the company possibility to disclaimer or to settle the action, the repayment of the costs of litigation due to the individual partner claimant and the limitation of actions. ABSTRACT III The fifth chapter (“The precautionary action of the s.r.l. director’s removal”) examines the many issues surrounding the precautionary action of the s.r.l. director’s removal, in conformity with the Art. 2476, comma 3, c.c. The s.r.l. director’s removal, in fact, has been inserted by the 2003 reform only as a precautionary measure. In fact, the legislator is silent about the possibility of the director’s removal through extra-judicial remedies, which, however, are analyzed in the search. During the essay one notes that the Art. 2476, comma 3, c.c. is a much debated issue by the doctrine and the jurisprudence, which have highlighted the gaps left open by the provision. In the same chapter there is the review of the conditions of the precautionary action of removal, that is periculum in mora and fumus boni iuris. Then one analyzes the possible relationship between the precautionary action of the s.r.l. director’s removal and the subsequent action for liability, an issue that has generated several lines of thought, conflicting with each other. In addition, there is the examination of the possible introduction of the precautionary measure ante causam, before introducing the action for liability. Finally, one mentions the remote possibility of the director’s removal through the Judge (in conformity with the Art. 2409 c.c.), disappeared after the famous judgment of the Constitutional Court n. 481/2005, which has categorically excluded the applicability of that provision to s.r.l., even to those ones supplied with board of auditors. The last chapter, the sixth (“The GmbH directors’ removal and feedback with the Italian legislation”), relates to the director’s removal in the German law, as regulated by § 38 GmbHG, comparing it with the Italian law. The cardinal principle of the German legislature in terms of the company director’s removal is the directors’ extra-judicial free revocability, with the exception of the restrictions contained in the articles of association. One analyzes the assumptions and mode of the removal procedure, with an emphasis on practical cases. Even the German legal system, like the Italian one, knows the precautionary action of the director’s removal, which is governed by the general provisions regarding the precautionary measures of the ZPO. With regard to arbitration, one analyzes the arbitrators’ power to removal the director with a precautionary measure. Finally, completing the ABSTRACT IV comparison with the German legal system, there are the gaps of the Italian law in terms of director’s removal, highlighting analogies and differences with the matching German rules. In conclusion, attention is drawn, through some examples, to possible changes in Italian legislation regarding s.r.l. according to the GmbH, in order to make effective the protection of partner and creditors of the company, to attract investors and to avoid the dreaded generalized drain to other company models, whether Italian ones or foreigner ones.
Книги з теми "Diritto degli affari"
Inzitari, Bruno. Le obbligazioni nel diritto civile degli affari. Padova: CEDAM, 2006.
Знайти повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Diritto degli affari"
Balboni, Paolo E. "14 • Politica linguistica: rallentare Darwin nell’Europa plurilingue." In Thesaurus di Linguistica Educativa: guida, testi, video. Venice: Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-607-7/014.
Повний текст джерела