Зміст
Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Declaratory / constitutive system"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Declaratory / constitutive system".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Declaratory / constitutive system"
Jung, Sangmin. "A Modern Transformation of the Perspective that a Declaratory Remedy is a Basic form or Prototype of All Lawsuit." Korea Association of the Law of Civil Procedure 28, no. 1 (February 28, 2024): 1–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.30639/cp.2024.2.28.1.001.
Повний текст джерелаSurlan, Tijana. "Recognition in international law: The case of Kosovo and Metohija." Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, no. 151 (2015): 289–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn1551289s.
Повний текст джерелаVern, Flora. "Land Registration Systems & Discourses of Property." European Review of Private Law 29, Issue 6 (December 1, 2021): 835–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2021044.
Повний текст джерелаJelínek, Petr. "African Union." Czech Journal of International Relations 38, no. 1 (January 1, 2003): 52–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.32422/cjir.983.
Повний текст джерелаNunner-Krautgasser, Bettina. "The Effect of Enforceability." LeXonomica 13, no. 1 (June 30, 2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.18690//lexonomica.13.17.-28.2021.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Declaratory / constitutive system"
Cracco, Amélie. "Les cοnséquences du Brexit sur la liberté de circulatiοn des persοnnes". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Normandie, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024NORMR073.
Повний текст джерелаIn accordance with the commitment made by the conservative party, the Leave victory in the referendum on the United Kingdom's membership of the European Union triggered the procedure set out in Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. Above all, the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union raised the question of the future relationship between the two entities. The prominence given to free movement of people during the referendum campaign prompted London to consider the various scenarios in the light of the possibilities offered in terms of controlling movements from Member States. They came down to an alternative: either to adapt free movement of people or to dismantle it. The first option did not fit well with the quest for sovereignty expressed during the campaign. Through the implementation of the second, the British government intended to demonstrate its ability to draw the consequences of withdrawal within the constrained timetable of the exit and to normalise relations with the European Union by bringing the treatment of EU citizens and their family members into line with the ordinary law on foreign nationals. In the absence of acquired rights, this undertaking required a transitional regime to be put in place to enable people who had exercised their right to free movement and whose situation was ongoing to continue to benefit from it.In the United Kingdom, alignment with ordinary law was not achieved without adaptations. It first led to a liberalisation of the immigration system, the main aim of which was to protect the dynamic and flexible labour market from deficiencies that could destabilise it. However, the consecutive increase in immigration from non-EU countries resulted in further restrictions of the conditions that the entry and residence of EU citizens and their family members has been subject to. The logic of reciprocity behind this alignment has led to a twofold phenomenon : loss of rights and redistribution of prospects for cross-mobility between, on the one hand, the European Union and its Member States and, on the other, the United Kingdom. Despite the ambition pursued, alignment has nevertheless remained incomplete. Pragmatism called for a preferential treatment in certain respects, which reflects a desire to preserve an essentially commercial relationship. The case of Ireland, where the United Kingdom has consistently reaffirmed its attachment to the Common Travel Area, is a noteworthy exception