Добірка наукової літератури з теми "CTMRG"

Liu, X. F., Y. F. Fu, W. Q. Yu, J. F. Yu, and Z. Y. Xie. "Variational Corner Transfer Matrix Renormalization Group Method for Classical Statistical Models." Chinese Physics Letters 39, no. 6 (June 1, 2022): 067502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0256-307x/39/6/067502.

Kemper, A., A. Gendiar, T. Nishino, A. Schadschneider, and J. Zittartz. "Stochastic light-cone CTMRG: a new DMRG approach to stochastic models." Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 36, no. 1 (December 12, 2002): 29–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/36/1/303.

Heard, Bridgette, Laura Miller, and Pankaj Kumar. "Reduction in Chemotherapy Mixing Errors Using Six Sigma: Illinois CancerCare Experience." Journal of Oncology Practice 8, no. 2 (March 2012): 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jop.2011.000440.

TING, TRACY V., DEEPA KUDALKAR, SHANNEN NELSON, SANDRA CORTINA, JOSHUA PENDL, SHAAISTA BUDHANI, JENNIFER NEVILLE, et al. "Usefulness of Cellular Text Messaging for Improving Adherence Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus." Journal of Rheumatology 39, no. 1 (November 15, 2011): 174–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110771.

Li, Xuemei, Bo Zhang, Rui Ren, Lanhai Li, and Slobodan P. Simonovic. "Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of Climate Warming in the Chinese Tianshan Mountainous Region." Water 14, no. 2 (January 11, 2022): 199. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w14020199.

Ekici, Ahmet, and Mark Peterson. "The Unique Relationship between Quality of Life and Consumer Trust in Market-Related Institutions among Financially Constrained Consumers in a Developing Country." Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 28, no. 1 (April 2009): 56–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.28.1.56.

Sá, Francisco Vanies da Silva, Marcos Eric Barbosa Brito, Luderlândio de Andrade Silva, Romulo Carantino Lucena Moreira, Pedro Dantas Fernandes, and Lizaiane Cardoso de Figueiredo. "Fisiologia da percepção do estresse salino em híbridos de tangerineira “Sunki Comum” sob solução hidropônica salinizada." Comunicata Scientiae 6, no. 4 (December 29, 2015): 463. http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/cs.v6i4.1121.

Akbaş, Eda, Banu Ünver, and Emin Ulaş Erdem. "Acute Effects of Connective Tissue Manipulation on Autonomic Function in Healthy Young Women." Complementary Medicine Research 26, no. 4 (2019): 250–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000497618.

Brito, Marcos Eric Barbosa, Pedro Dantas Fernandes, Hans Raj Gheyi, Lauriane Almeida dos Anjos Soares, Walter dos Santos Soares Filho, and Janivan Fernandes Suassuna. "Screening of citrus scion-rootstock combinations for tolerance to water salinity during seedling formation." Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 43 (November 5, 2020): e48163. http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v43i1.48163.

Deser, S., and J. Franklin. "Is BTZ a separate superselection sector of CTMG?" Physics Letters B 693, no. 5 (October 2010): 609–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.019.

Bhaduri, Debayan. "Tools and Techniques for Evaluating Reliability Trade-offs for Nano-Architectures." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/9918.

Dudalev, Mikhail. "Computational approach to scaling and criticality in planar Ising models." Phd thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/9860.

Mathew, Tom V., Gaurang J. Joshi, Nagendra R. Velaga, and Shriniwas Arkatkar. Transportation Research: Proceedings of CTRG 2017. Springer, 2019.

Mathew, Tom V., Gaurang J. Joshi, Nagendra R. Velaga, and Shriniwas Arkatkar. Transportation Research: Proceedings of CTRG 2017. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited, 2020.

Das, Animesh, Akhilesh Kumar Maurya, Bhargab Maitra, and Rajat Rastogi. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Transportation Research Group of India: 5th CTRG Volume 2. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited, 2022.

Maji, Avijit, Lelitha Devi, Madhu Errampalli, and Gitakrishnan Ramadurai. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Transportation Research Group of India: CTRG 2021 Volume 3. Springer, 2022.

Devi, Lelitha, Animesh Das, Debasis Basu, and Prasanta Kumar Sahu. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Transportation Research Group of India: CTRG 2021 Volume 1. Springer, 2022.

Devi, Lelitha, Gowri Asaithambi, Ashish Verma, and Shriniwas Arkatkar. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Transportation Research Group of India: CTRG 2021 Volume 2. Springer, 2022.

Singh, Dharamveer, Lelitha Vanajakshi, Ashish Verma, and Animesh Das. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Transportation Research Group of India: 5th CTRG Volume 1. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited, 2022.

Parida, Manoranjan, Avijit Maji, S. Velmurugan, and Animesh Das. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Transportation Research Group of India: 5th CTRG Volume 3. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited, 2022.

Sansone, Carlo, Vittorio Murino, Enrico Puppo, Marco Cristani, and Diego Sona. New Trends in Image Analysis and Processing - ICIAP 2015: ICIAP 2015 International Workshops, BioFor, CTMR, RHEUMA, ISCA, MADiMA, SBMI, and QoEM, Genoa, Italy, September 7-8, 2015, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing AG, 2015.

Sansone, Carlo, Vittorio Murino, Enrico Puppo, Marco Cristani, and Diego Sona. New Trends in Image Analysis and Processing -- ICIAP 2015 Workshops: ICIAP 2015 International Workshops, BioFor, CTMR, RHEUMA, ISCA, MADiMa, SBMI, and QoEM, Genoa, Italy, September 7-8, 2015, Proceedings. Springer London, Limited, 2015.

Mühlendahl, Alexander, Dimitris Botis, Spyros Maniatis, and Imogen Wiseman. "Distinctiveness Acquired Through Use." In Trade Mark Law in Europe. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726050.003.0006.

"interests are adversely affected by the claim of the CTM to the UK mark’s seniority must be able to contest the UK registration. Where the UK mark is still registered, this is not difficult. But where the UK mark has been relinquished voluntarily, the registry will have to establish whether it could have been revoked or invalidated if it were still on the register. This is the situation to which the regulations to be made under s 52(2)(b) is directed. Third, there have to be provisions concerning the conversion of a CTM or an application for one into a national application. This is because the CTMR provides for the applicant for, or owner of, a CTM to request that the application or registration be converted if it is refused or withdrawn, or ceases to have effect (wholly or partially). This situation is likely to arise where a CTM application conflicts with an earlier trademark registered in one or more Member States. The CTMR provides then that the applicant can request that the application be converted into national applications in Member States where there is no conflict. The request has to be filed with the CTMO, which passes it on to the national intellectual property offices of the Member States concerned. A national application arising in this way is treated no differently from an application filed in the normal way at the national registry at the date of filing of the original CTM application. Fourth, the regulation requires that the Member States designate courts to be Community trademark courts. Proceedings for infringement will be able to be brought in one such court: its decision will have Community-wide effect. The regulation sets out the rules for determining which Member State’s courts have jurisdiction: this depends on the domicile or place of business of the defendant or plaintiff, or on where the infringement has taken place. If the latter route is chosen, however, the judgment will have effect only in that Member State. The government proposes to designate those courts which presently have jurisdiction to hear trademark infringement cases: the High Court in England and Wales and in Northern Ireland and the Court of Session in Scotland. Fifth, certain provisions of the Act will be applied to Community trademarks too, and these require statutory instruments. They are: -Groundless threats; -Seizure by Customs and Excise of infringing matter; -Fraudulent use of a trademark. All instruments which may be made under these powers will be subject to the negative resolution procedure." In Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law, 666. Routledge-Cavendish, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843142928-125.

"The Community Trademark Regulation will establish a system whereby a Community trademark can be obtained by registration at the Community Trademarks Office, which the regulation establishes. The mark is a unitary right, which has effect throughout the EC, and the proprietor will be able to proceed against infringements taking place in several Member States through a single action in a designated court in a single Member State. The Commission’s original proposal for a regulation was published in 1980. The European Council decided on 29 October 1993 that the office should be located in Spain (and that the proposed Community Designs Office should be there too) and that the languages of the office should be English, French, German, Italian and Spanish. The regulation, which had been stalled over these matters for many years, was then adopted. The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, which will run the Community trademark system, started operations on 1 April 1996. It had been accepting applications since the start of the year, but they will not be examined before April and will be accorded a filing date of 1 April. The Act makes provision for the necessary regulations to be made in the UK. However, the provisions which deal with this matter will have no effect until the Community trademark is up and running. Section 52 is the provision which enables the government to make regulations required for the introduction of the Community Trademark Regulation. It empowers the Secretary of State to make the necessary provisions by regulation. The Community Trademark Regulation will, like other EC regulations, be directly effective in the UK (and in all other Member States). However, there are consequential matters which do require domestic legislation. First, applications for Community trademarks may be made through the national intellectual property offices of the Member States. In the UK, this means that an application for a CTM may be made to the Patent Office, in the same way as an application under the 1994 Act. Applications filed in this way will not be examined by the Patent Office, but simply passed within the two weeks prescribed in the CTMR to the CTMO in Alicante: a receipt will be issued and a handling charge made. Second, there have to be provisions to enable the UK registry to determine a posteriori the validity or liability to revocation of a registration of a trademark from which a Community trademark claims seniority. This is not only a consequence of the regulation but a requirement of the directive (Article 14). The problem is that a CTM may claim priority from an earlier UK trademark: the CTM then stands in the shoes of the UK registration if a dispute arises between it and another trademark. This will continue to be the case even if the UK mark is surrendered or lapses, but not if it is revoked or invalidated. This means that anyone whose." In Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law, 665. Routledge-Cavendish, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843142928-124.