Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Criminal wrongdoing / Книги

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Criminal wrongdoing.

Книги з теми "Criminal wrongdoing"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 10 грудня 2022

Оновлено: 28 січня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-33 книг для дослідження на тему "Criminal wrongdoing".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте книги для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Accountability for collective wrongdoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Forgiveness and retribution: Responding to wrongdoing. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Feinberg, Joel. The moral limits of the criminal law: Harmless wrongdoing. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Yalof, David Alistair. Prosecution among friends: Presidents, attorneys general, and executive branch wrongdoing. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Prosecution among friends: Presidents, attorneys general, and executive branch wrongdoing. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Feinberg, Joel. Harmless Wrongdoing. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Feinberg, Joel. Harmless Wrongdoing. Oxford University Press, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Vernon, Richard, and Tracy Isaacs. Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Vernon, Richard, and Tracy Isaacs. Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Vernon, Richard, and Tracy Isaacs. Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Vernon, Richard, and Tracy Isaacs. Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Vernon, Richard, and Tracy Isaacs. Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Developing Restorative Justice Jurisprudence: Rethinking Responses to Criminal Wrongdoing. Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Foley, Tony. Developing Restorative Justice Jurisprudence: Rethinking Responses to Criminal Wrongdoing. Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Foley, Tony. Developing Restorative Justice Jurisprudence: Rethinking Responses to Criminal Wrongdoing. Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Foley, Tony. Developing Restorative Justice Jurisprudence: Rethinking Responses to Criminal Wrongdoing. Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Holmgren, Margaret R. Forgiveness and Retribution: Responding to Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Holmgren, Margaret R. Forgiveness and Retribution: Responding to Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Simester, A. P. Fundamentals of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198853145.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This book explores the theoretical principles underlying the general part of the criminal law. It demonstrates how the major general part doctrines governing actus reus, mens rea, and defences are informed by deeper considerations of responsibility, culpability, and wrongdoing. The book shows how many of the criminal law’s doctrines can and should accommodate the demand that criminal convictions be imposed only upon persons who are culpable for their wrongdoing. But those same doctrines are not always driven by culpability. They are grounded also in certain further principles that the book identifies: specifically, principles of “moral responsibility”, “ascriptive responsibility”, and “wrongdoing”. Neither can many of those doctrines be separated from questions of criminalization. Doctrines governing such matters as causation, omissions, complicity, and even mens rea all serve more than one foundational principle, requiring mediation and compromise. As such, the book argues, they engage wider debates about wrongdoing, and about the boundaries between liability and freedom.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Harmless Wrongdoing (Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, Vol 4). Oxford University Press, USA, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Harmless Wrongdoing (Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, Vol 4). Oxford University Press, USA, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Walker, Margaret Urban. Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations after Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Walker, Margaret Urban. Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations after Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Pereboom, Derk. Wrongdoing and the Moral Emotions. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846006.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This book provides an account of how we might address wrongdoing given challenges to anger and retribution that arise from ethical considerations and from concerns about free will. It contends that we should dispense with basically deserved pain and harm, and with associated retributive sentiments. Without such desert, how might we understand blame? Blame can be conceived as taking on a non-retributive stance of moral protest, whose function is to secure forward-looking goals such as moral reform and reconciliation. Is it possible to justify effectively dealing with those who pose dangerous threats if they do not deserve to be harmed? Wrongfully posing such a threat, by contrast with deserving harm for posing the threat, is proposed as the core condition for the legitimacy of defensive harming. An account is then provided for addressing criminal behavior without a retributive justification for punishment, one in which the right of self-defense provides justification for measures such as preventative detention. How might we forgive if wrongdoers don’t basically deserve the pain of being resented, which forgiveness would then renounce? Forgiveness might instead be conceived as the renunciation of the stance of moral protest. But how might personal relationships function without retributive anger having a role in responding to wrongdoing? The stance of moral protest, together with non-retributive emotions, is argued to be sufficient. The book closes with a consideration of attitudes regarding the fate of humanity in a deterministic universe replete with wrongdoing, and defends the rationality of a transcendent hope for humanity.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

Brown, Darryl K., Jenia Iontcheva Turner, and Bettina Weisser, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This handbook examines various aspects of the criminal process, including the role of prosecutors in common law and civil law jurisdictions, the rights and duties of experts, victim rights in civil law jurisdictions, surveillance and investigation, criminal prosecution and its alternatives, evidence discovery and disclosure in common law systems, evidence law as forensic science, common law plea bargaining, appeals and post-conviction review, and procedure in international tribunals. The book is organized into eight parts covering topics ranging from criminal process in the dual penal state to interrogation law and practice in common law jurisdictions, empirical and comparative approaches to criminal procedure, prosecution-led investigations and measures of procedural coercion in the field of corruption, international corporate prosecutions, special procedures for white-collar and corporate wrongdoing in Europe, and trial procedure in response to terrorism. Also discussed are the roles of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights as guardians of fair criminal proceedings in Europe, double jeopardy or ne bis in idem in common law and civil law jurisdictions, plea bargaining vs. abbreviated trial procedures, restorative justice as an alternative to penal sanctions, and the pluralistic nature of international criminal procedure.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Yaffe, Gideon. The Age of Culpability. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803324.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Reflection on the grounds for leniency towards children who commit crimes is the entry point into the development, in this book, of a theory of the nature of criminal responsibility and desert of punishment for crime. The book argues that child criminals are owed lesser punishments than adults thanks not to their psychological, behavioral, or neural immaturity but, instead, because they are denied the vote. This conclusion is reached through the development of theories of the nature of criminal culpability, desert for wrongdoing, strength of legal reasons, and what it is to have a say over the law, theories that produce a bridge between limited participation in government and criminal culpability. The cornerstone of this discussion is the proposed theory of criminal culpability. To be criminally culpable is for one’s criminal act to manifest a failure to grant sufficient weight to the legal reasons to refrain. The stronger the legal reasons, then, the greater the criminal culpability. Those who lack a say over the law, it is argued, have weaker legal reasons to refrain from crime than those who have a say. They are therefore reduced in criminal culpability and deserve lesser punishment for their crimes. Children are owed leniency, then, because of the political meaning of age rather than because of its psychological meaning. This position has implications for criminal justice policy, with respect to, among other things, the interrogation of children suspected of crimes and the enfranchisement of adult felons.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Horder, Jeremy. Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823704.003.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The criminal law has the resources to address corruption in politics, if prosecutors are willing to use it, and if courts are willing to interpret it so that it provides adequate coverage of wrongdoing, particularly wrongdoing in the form of personal corruption engaged in by Members of Parliament. There needs to be a greater willingness to expose the worst corrupt wrongdoers in high office to the risk of judgment at the bar of public opinion, in the form of jury trial. The offence of misconduct in office provides the most appropriate means of doing this. This is not just because it is likely to provide the most appropriate label, but because the offence highlights the constitutionally fundamental bond of trust between the citizen and the state that is broken when officials indulge in corruption.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Brink, David O. The Path to Completion. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805601.003.0010.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Attempted wrongdoing is wrong and deserves censure and sanction, provided the agent was responsible for her attempt. One conception of attempts, incorporated in the criminal law, treats them as bivalent. The important question is at what point in an agent’s planning, preparation, and execution of an offense the attempt is completed. However, bivalence fails to recognize partially complete attempts and is unable to give a satisfying account of the criminal law defense of abandonment. This essay explores an alternative conception of attempts as historical and scalar. On this view, attempts involve the implementation of temporally extended decision trees that pass through many nodes and terminate in a last act. This view rejects bivalence, because at many points within the decision tree there is only a partially complete attempt, and it provides a more satisfying account of abandonment, precisely because it can recognize attempts that are partially complete.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Brink, David O. Fair Opportunity and Responsibility. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859468.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Fair Opportunity and Responsibility lies at the intersection of moral psychology and criminal jurisprudence and analyzes responsibility and its relations to desert, culpability, excuse, blame, and punishment. It links responsibility with the reactive attitudes but makes the justification of the reactive attitudes depend on a response-independent conception of responsibility. Responsibility and excuse are inversely related; an agent is responsible for misconduct if and only if it is not excused. Consequently, we can study responsibility by understanding excuses. We excuse misconduct when an agent’s capacities or opportunities are significantly impaired, because these capacities and opportunities are essential if agents are to have a fair opportunity to avoid wrongdoing. This conception of excuse tells us that responsibility itself consists in agents having suitable cognitive and volitional capacities—normative competence—and a fair opportunity to exercise these capacities free from undue interference—situational control. Because our reactive attitudes and practices presuppose the fair opportunity conception of responsibility, this supports a predominantly retributive conception of blame and punishment that treats culpable wrongdoing as the desert basis of blame and punishment. We can then apply the fair opportunity framework to assessing responsibility and excuse in circumstances of structural injustice, situational influences in ordinary circumstances and in wartime, insanity and psychopathy, immaturity, addiction, and crimes of passion. Though fair opportunity has important implications for each issue, treating them together allows us to explore common themes and appreciate the need to take partial responsibility and excuse seriously in our practices of blame and punishment.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Edmonds, David, ed. Future Morality. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862086.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The world is changing so fast that it is hard to know how to think about what we ought to do. We barely have time to reflect on how scientific advances will affect our lives before they are upon us. New kinds of dilemma are springing up. Can robots be held responsible for their actions? Will artificial intelligence be able to predict criminal activity? Is the future gender-fluid? Should we strive to become post-human? Should we use drugs to improve our intimate relationships — or to reduce crime? Our intuitions about questions like these are often both weak and confused. This book presents provocative and engaging pieces about aspects of life today, and life tomorrow — birth and death, health and medicine, brain and body, personal relationships, wrongdoing and justice, the internet, animals, and the environment.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Reiff, Mark R. Punishment in the executive suite: Moral responsibility, causal responsibility, and financial crime. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755661.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Despite the enormity of the financial losses flowing from the 2008 financial crisis and the outrageousness of the conduct that led up to it, almost no individual involved has been prosecuted for criminal conduct, much less actually gone to prison. This chapter argues that the failure to punish those in management for their role in this misconduct stems from a misunderstanding of the need to prove that they personally knew of this wrongdoing and harbored an intent to defraud. Not only would negligence be a sufficient legal and moral basis for imposing terms of imprisonment in these cases, mere causal responsibility would also be enough, for causal responsibility has embedded in it all we need to find those causally responsible morally responsible too, and once some basis for moral responsibility is established, the imposition of terms of imprisonment is both legally possible and morally just.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Mackay, Ronnie, and Warren Brookbanks, eds. Fitness to Plead. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198788478.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

While criminalisation may be justified whenever an offender commits a sufficiently serious moral wrong requiring that he or she be called to account, the doctrine of fitness to plead calls this principle into question in the case of a person who lacks the capacity to participate meaningfully in a criminal trial. In light of the emerging focus on capacity-based approaches to decision making and the international human rights requirement that the law should treat defendants fairly, this volume offers a benchmark for the theory and practice of fitness to plead, considering differing perspectives and debate on the future development of a doctrine which has up until now been under-discussed and under-researched. The fitness-to-plead rules stand as an exception to notions of public accountability for criminal wrongdoing yet, despite the doctrine’s long-standing function in criminal procedure, it has proven complex to apply in practice and has given rise to many varied legislative models and considerable litigation in different jurisdictions. Particularly troublesome is the question of what is to be done with someone who has been found unfit to stand trial. Here the law is required to balance the need to protect these defendants who are unable to participate effectively in their own trial, whether permanently or for a defined period, with the need to protect the public from people who may have caused serious social harm as a result of their antisocial behaviour. The challenge for law reformers, legislators, and judges is to create rules that ensure that everyone who can properly be tried is tried, while seeking to preserve confidence in the fairness of the legal system by ensuring that people who cannot properly engage in the criminal trial process are not forced to endure it.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!