Книги з теми "Cost evaluations"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Cost evaluations.

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 книг для дослідження на тему "Cost evaluations".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте книги для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Camm, Thomas W. Simplified cost models for prefeasibility mineral evaluations. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1991.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Cost-benefit analysis and health care evaluations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

1946-, Brent Robert J., ed. Cost-benefit analysis and health care evaluations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Martikainen, Janne. Application of decision-analytic modelling in health economic evaluations. Kuopio: University of Kuopio, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

M, Gueron Judith, ed. Are high-cost services more effective than low-cost services?: Evidence from experimental evaluations of welfare-to-work programs. New York, N.Y: Manpower Demonstration Research Corp., 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Osteoporosis and other Rheumatic Diseases. Recommendations for health economics evaluations of interventions in osteoporosis. [Geneva]: World Health Organization, Dept. of Noncommunicable Disease Management, Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Arthritis, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Marginal cost in the new economy: A proposal for a uniform approach to policy evaluations. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Wegmuller, Yann. Health prevention and cost-effectiveness: Construction of guidelines for conducting economic evaluations of druguse prevention programmes. Dublin: University College Dublin, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Shaffer, Marvin. Multiple account benefit-cost analysis: A practical guide for the systematic evaluation of project and policy alternatives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Shaffer, Marvin. Multiple account benefit-cost analysis: A practical guide for the systematic evaluation of project and policy alternatives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
11

Mathews, Kenneth H. The 1992 grazing fee review and evaluation report update: Data and methods. [Washington, DC] (1301 New York Ave., NW., Washington 20005-4788): U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Commodity Economics Divisionmy Division, 1991.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
12

Office, Global Environment Facility Evaluation. Evaluation of incremental cost assessment. Washington, DC: Global Environment Facility, Evaluation Office, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
13

Morse, Wayne J. Cost accounting: Processing, evaluating, and using cost data. 3rd ed. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1986.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
14

Morse, Wayne J. Cost accounting: Processing, evaluating and using cost data. 3rd ed. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1986.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
15

Gérard, Gäfgen, and Oberender Peter, eds. Evaluation gesundheitspolitischer Massnahmen. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1991.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
16

Martin, Robert E. The college cost disease: Higher cost and lower quality. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
17

Fitzmaurice, J. Michael. Patient outcome research. [Rockville, Md.?]: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
18

Life-cost approach to building evaluation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
19

Vittorio, Demicheli, and Mugford Miranda, eds. Elementary economic evaluation in health care. London: BMJ Pub. Group, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
20

Auld, Terry S. Economic evaluation: A guide for non-economists. Wellington, N.Z: School of Commerce, Wellington Polytechnic, 1991.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
21

T, Pizzi Laura, and Lofland Jennifer H, eds. Economic evaluation in U.S. health care: Principles and applications. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
22

Office, General Accounting. Federal facilities: Consistent relative risk evaluations needed for prioritizing cleanups : report to the Chairman, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
23

Office, General Accounting. Federal facilities: Consistent relative risk evaluations needed for prioritizing cleanups : report to the Chairman, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: U.S. General Accounting Office, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
24

Theory and methods of economic evaluation of health care. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
25

Ekardt, Felix. Economic Evaluation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economic Ethics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99284-2.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
26

Gregson, W. Charlottenburgh Township: Project cost evaluation and review. [Toronto]: Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Approvals and Project Engineering Branch, Value Engineering, 1985.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
27

Hammond, Peter J. Project evaluation by potential tax reform. Stanford, Calif: Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, 1985.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
28

Brent, Robert J. Cost-benefit analysis for developing countries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1998.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
29

McCall, Nelda. Evaluation of the Arizona health care cost-containment system. [Baltimore, Md.?: Health Care Financing Administration, 1985.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
30

McCall, Nelda. Evaluation of the Arizona health care cost-containment system. [Baltimore, Md.?: Health Care Financing Administration, 1985.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
31

F, Drummond M., and Drummond, M. F. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes., eds. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
32

Hermann, Witte. Die Integration monetärer und nichtmonetärer Bewertungen: Ein Problem volkswirtschaftlicher Bewertungsansätze. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1989.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
33

Rubin, Robert J. Medicare participating heart bypass center demonstration: Final evaluation report : volume II : marketing activities of participating hospitals. Fairfax, Va: Lewin-VHI, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
34

Boonen, Annelies. Cost-of-illness and economic evaluations in axial spondyloarthritis. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198734444.003.0025.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Consideration of costs and budgets plays an increasingly important role in decisions on access to innovative technologies. When clinicians want to influence such decisions, it is essential to understand the information on the burden of the disease and the evidence on cost-effectiveness of technologies. This chapter provides guidance to understanding the key methodological principles of economic evaluations, and describes available evidence on these issues in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). In the prebiologics era, the cost-of-illness for society of ankylosing spondylitis was slightly lower than for rheumatoid arthritis, and substantially lower than chronic low back pain. Cost of sick leave and work disability accounted for up to 75% of total cost-of-illness. Treatment with biologics increased cost-of-illness substantially, but the important gain in quality-adjusted life years resulted in acceptable cost-effectiveness in patients with active disease. There remains a gap in knowledge about the cost-effectiveness of diagnosing and treating axSpA earlier.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
35

Brent, Robert J. Cost Benefit Analysis and Health Care Evaluations. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
36

Cost-Benefit Analysis and Health Care Evaluations. Elgar Publishing Limited, Edward, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
37

Brent, Robert J. Cost-benefit Analysis And Health Care Evaluations. Edward Elgar Pub, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
38

Brent, Robert. Cost–Benefit Analysis and Health Care Evaluations, Second Edition. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781004593.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
39

Conkling, Roger L. Marginal Cost in the New Economy : a Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations: A Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations. Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
40

Conkling, Roger L. Marginal Cost in the New Economy : a Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations: A Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations. Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
41

Conkling, Roger L. Marginal Cost in the New Economy : a Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations: A Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations. Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
42

Conkling, Roger L. Marginal Cost in the New Economy : a Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations: A Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations. Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
43

Wallace, David J., and Derek C. Angus. Costs and cost-effectiveness in critical care. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199600830.003.0022.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Critical care accounts for a large and growing part of national health expenditures. Cost-effectiveness analyses are one way to identify therapies that maximize society’s return on investment. This chapter provides a broad overview of four cost study designs—cost-minimization, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility. Cost -effectiveness analysis allows the costs and benefits of different therapies to be directly compared. Within a constrained budget, cost-effectiveness analysis can identify the optimal therapies for funding. Policy informed by cost effectiveness should improve public health. The reader is introduced to the concepts of cost perspective, included costs and cost discounting. We conclude by describing policy implications of cost effectiveness evaluations and highlight their relevance to the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
44

Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment., ed. Comparative clinical and budget evaluations of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone with other anti-diabetic agents. Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
45

NHS Centre for Reviews & Dissemination., ed. Making cost-effectiveness information accessible: The NHS Economic Evaluation Database Project : CRD guidance for reporting critical summaries of economic evaluations. York: NHS Centre for Reviews & Dissemination, University of York, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
46

Conkling, Roger L. Marginal Cost in the New Economy: A Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations. M.E. Sharpe, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
47

Conkling, Roger L. Marginal Cost in the New Economy: A Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315702568.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
48

Conkling, Roger L. Marginal Cost in the Economy: A Proposal for a Uniform Approach to Policy Evaluations (Economic Policy). M.E. Sharpe, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
49

Schweitzer, Stuart O., and Z. John Lu. Economic Evaluation of New Drugs. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190623784.003.0009.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
As a result of new cost-containment incentives found in both public and private healthcare plans, providers and insurers are subjecting new healthcare services, and especially pharmaceuticals, to evaluations in which costs and benefits are explicitly compared. Collectively, this body of work is referred to as health technology assessment. This chapter discusses in detail the three methodologies most frequently utilized in HTA: cost-benefit analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, and cost-utility analysis. The appropriate roles for each of these approaches and examples of their applications in several influential HTA organizations around the world are elaborated, including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the UK, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee in Australia, and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. The history and current state of HTA in the United States is also examined in the chapter.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
50

Gugerty, Mary Kay, and Dean Karlan. The CART Principles for Impact Evaluation. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199366088.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The CART principles are essential for designing a right-fit impact evaluation. This chapter explains what it means to conduct credible, actionable, responsible, and transportable impact evaluation. To ensure that impact evaluations follow the CART principles, organizations ought to strive for bias-free data collection and analysis. Bias (systematic error that favors one measure over another) may come from the way data are collected (question wording influences responses), or the way they are analyzed (e.g., influence of external factors or how people are selected into programs). In many cases, an randomizied control trial (RCT) helps generate a credible impact evaluation. In the simplest version of an RCT, individuals are randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. However, in special circumstances, other quasi-experimental evaluation methods can be successful. Actionable impact evaluation requires that organizations commit to learn from the undertaking and act on the results, even if they are disappointing. Organizations can make sure an evaluation is responsible by weighing how much it costs relative to its expected benefits. This chapter also addresses common criticisms about RCTs and identifies some strategies for reducing their cost. Finally, the chapter explains that the transportable principle mandates that evaluations produce useful evidence for others.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії