Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: CORPORATE ECOSYSTEM.
Статті в журналах з теми "CORPORATE ECOSYSTEM"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "CORPORATE ECOSYSTEM".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.
1
Shevchuk, Dmitrii, Igor Ilin, Victoria Iliashenko, and Alissa Dubgorn. "Corporate innovation ecosystems: challenges and opportunities." E3S Web of Conferences 258 (2021): 01005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125801005.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article proposes to consider the concepts of an innovation ecosystem and a digital platform. The analysis of world experience in terms of corporate innovative ecosystems contributing to the accelerated implementation of innovations is presented. The article focuses on corporate innovation ecosystems, gives their definition and key functions. The analysis of the management of innovative ecosystems in the world and in Russia is given. Describes the ecosystem approach and the structure of the corporate innovation ecosystem. As part of the study, it is planned to form a scheme for organizing a corporate innovation ecosystem, considering the place of digital platforms in the entire ecosystem.
2
Glushchenko, Valery. "APPLICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY OF ERGONOMIC DESIGN IN THE CREATION OF REGIONAL AND CORPORATE ANTHROPOGENIC ECOSYSTEMS." Ergodesign 2022, no. 3 (September 7, 2022): 155–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.30987/2658-4026-2022-3-155-161.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The subject of the article is the development of the methodology of ergonomic design in the design of anthropogenic corporate and regional ecosystems; the object of the article is the ergonomic design of an anthropogenic corporate or regional ecosystem; the purpose of the work is to increase the efficiency of anthropogenic corporate or regional ecosystems; to achieve this goal, the following tasks are solved: descriptions of the method of ergonomic design of design complex systems; the content of the ecosystem approach in the design of anthropogenic objects in the development of the 9th technological order is studied; the concept and essence of a corporate or regional ecosystem are described; criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of corporate and regional anthropogenic ecosystems are discussed; the stages of creating corporate and regional ecosystems are described; the ergonomic design of the risks of creating corporate regional ecosystems is described; scientific the methods in the article are: methodology of ergonomical design; historical analysis; ecosystem approach; theory of technological orders; system and logical analysis; forecasting; scientific novelty of the article is connected with the development of the methodology of ergonomic design as a tool for designing corporate and regional ecosystems.
3
Vrabec, Sandi, Krištof Zorko, and Vito Bobek. "Sustainable Start-Up Ecosystems in Terms of Capital Investment and Other Business Opportunities for Corporate Involvement – A Comparative Analysis of Hong Kong and Shenzhen." International Journal of Economics and Finance 15, no. 6 (May 30, 2023): 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v15n6p75.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Start-ups play one of the most significant roles in global economic development. The business environment or the business ecosystem is well-known in entrepreneurship. A start-up’s success level is positively correlated with the environment in which it operates. One of the supporting factors in the start-up ecosystems is corporations, which try to connect with start-up companies using corporate acceleration programs. Another one is a higher engagement of educational institutions within the start-up environment. The study is a comparative analysis of start-up ecosystems in Shenzhen and Hong Kong from a corporate initiative perspective. The study applied a triangulated approach, synergizing primary data from interviews with relevant start-up ecosystem stakeholders and secondary data to further examine and support the initial findings. The results identified and compared the development levels of the Hong Kong and Shenzhen start-up ecosystems and were sufficient to create recommendations and best practices for start-ups and corporates interested in the respective areas. The findings suggest that Shenzhen’s start-up ecosystem is more attractive for corporations than Hong Kong’s within the context of innovation, technology, and talent. Hong Kong will first maintain its role as a business hub and as an international asset management center and, secondly, promote the development of technologies and innovation to increase its global competitiveness. The Outline Plan positions Shenzhen as a leading innovation hub within the broader area aiming to increase the city’s level of internationalization.
4
Qonaah, Siti Qonaah. "Implementasi Program Bina Lingkungan Corporat Social Responsibility PT Pertamina Dalam Upaya Pelestarian Ekosistem Laut." Jurnal Komunikasi 10, no. 2 (September 3, 2019): 153–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.31294/jkom.v10i2.6194.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Indonesia is a maritime country, The economic system of the people on the coast depends on the natural resources of the sea which produce various marine and fishery products. With a damaged marine environment due to illegal fishing, natural disasters, and damaged marine ecosystems activities that have the potential to protect the marine environment are needed. To preserve Indonesia's marine ecosystem, Pertamina is implementing an environmental development program which is one of its corporate social responsibility programs. Pertamina is committed to always prioritizing the balance and preservation of nature, the environment, society. Implementation of environmental development programs carried out includes providing support for Wasi, providing aid for environmental education props and Coral Reef Rehabilitation. This research is to find out the implementation of Pertamina's corporate social responsibility environmental development program in the preservation of marine ecosystems. In this study, researchers used a qualitative approach and case studies, as a research method that illustrates that the implementation of the corporate social environmental development program will benefit the community in the preservation of Indonesia's marine ecosystem. By improving human, natural and environmental welfare, Pertamina will be able to achieve sustainable business growth.Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Preservation of Marine Ecosystems
5
Vitalii, CHUBAIEVSKYI, and VOLOSOVYCH Svitlana. "SECURITY OF CORPORATE INFORMATION IN FINTECH ECOSYSTEM." Foreign trade: economics, finance, law 119, no. 6 (December 22, 2021): 98–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2021(119)08.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Background. With the intensification of digitalization processes, the use of FinTech tools by various business entities, which include both financial service offerors and their consumers, is becoming especially important. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The works of many scientists are devoted to the functioning of various aspects of corporate information systems. However, there is currently a lack of research on the feasibility of using financial technology instruments by business entities, their threats and security for corporate information systems. The aim of the article is to study the place of FinTech tools in the corporate information system, identify threats to their use and ensure the security of their operation. Materials and methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study are the works of domestic and foreign scientists on the functioning of corporate information systems and FinTech ecosystems. Results. The basis of digital transformation is the use of innovative technologies in the financial services market. This leads to the appropriate transformation of information systems of business entities and ensuring their security. There is an intensification of business use of digital banking services, digital insurance, payment platforms, raising funds through crowdfunding platforms, investing. The FinTech ecosystem within the sectoral approach should be understood as the areas of application of financial technology instruments, the services of which are used by various consumers, in particular, business entities, individuals, public authorities.The increasing digitalization of financial activities of business entities as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic has intensified the creation of additional challenges for corporate information systems for the implementation of cyber risks. Conclusion. The use of financial technology tools by business entities leads to the formation of FinTech ecosystems. Ensuring the security of information systems is the key to corporate stability. The challenge of countering cyber threats is not only for financial service offerors, but also for business entities that are their consumers, as the use of financial technology tools in financial transactions causes risks to all participants in the FinTech ecosystem.
6
Godwin, Andrew. ":The Chinese Corporate Ecosystem." China Journal 90 (July 1, 2023): 176–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/725572.
Повний текст джерела
7
West, Joel, and Paul Olk. "Distributed Governance of a Complex Ecosystem: How R&D Consortia Orchestrate the Alzheimer’s Knowledge Ecosystem." California Management Review 65, no. 2 (February 2023): 93–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00081256231165329.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Orchestrating an ecosystem requires coordination to create value, but prior research has tended to emphasize centralized ecosystem control over solutions involving distributed governance. By studying multilateral public-private collaborations to develop scientific knowledge to find a cure for Alzheimer’s disease, we identify a new model of ecosystem control—indirect and distributed governance using R&D consortia. We report archival and interview data on 46 consortia with overlapping corporate, nonprofit, and governmental membership. We find three models of consortia that allow member organizations to jointly orchestrate an ecosystem without centralized control. We discuss the broader implications of this model for orchestrating ecosystems.
8
Agrawal, Namit, Madhuri Banda, Anthony Marshall, Nipun Mehrotra, and Clifford Patrao. "How India can be essential to the global ecosystem economy." Strategy & Leadership 45, no. 4 (July 17, 2017): 33–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sl-05-2017-0046.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose Outlines why India is poised to be a key partner in the global ecosystem economy Design/methodology/approach Researches the advantage India has and the steps it is taking to make itself a leaders in ecosystem businesses. Findings 54 percent of Indian executives expect ecosystems to replace traditional value chains with new value models. and 92 percent expect to change primary organizational activities due to the emergence of ecosystems. Practical implications To maximize and capture benefits from ecosystems, business, educational and government leaders can pursue three key steps to participate in rapidly emerging Indian business ecosystems. Originality/value This study puts together both the corporate and governmental actions that promote the right conditions for ecosystem entrepreneurship so that potential partners have a unique view of the opportunities to participate in this rapidly changing economy.
9
Vetrova, E. A. "Corporate reliability of the digital ecosystem in the sphere of rendering banking services." Vestnik NSUEM, no. 1 (May 11, 2022): 238–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.34020/2073-6495-2022-1-238-249.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The article considers the preferences received by all participants of financial transactions in the course of implementation of digital technologies. It identifies the opportunity to modify the general marketing banks strategy based on digitalization and, as a result, to change the entire bank system configuration towards the strengthening of corporate banking structures through the creation of digital ecosystems. It was proved that corporate reliability of digital ecosystem in the market of banking services was ensured by absolute minimization of credit and other financial risks, total elimination of bank fraud. The formation of digital ecosystem in DPR based on the institution of Central Republican Bank (CRB) was suggested. It is substantiated that creation of the CRB DPR ecosystem will secure working capital for enterprises and other business entities of this old industrial region and will increase the efficiency of local authorities in provision of social and other essential services to the public.
10
Davidson, Steven, Martin Harmer, and Anthony Marshall. "Strategies for creating and capturing value in the emerging ecosystem economy." Strategy & Leadership 43, no. 2 (March 16, 2015): 2–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sl-01-2015-0003.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose – This article identifies a new transactional system–the business ecosystem. It describes the characteristics and drivers of these complex webs of interdependent enterprises and other participants which create unique value through synergistic relationships. Design/methodology/approach – The article explains how innovative organizations can seek new opportunities and develop new competencies in business ecosystems they will explicitly create or participate in. Findings – Ecosystems provide stimulus for, and a path to organizational and industry transformation – connecting people and organizations in new and different ways, and providing access to skills and expertise often unavailable outside the ecosystem. Practical implications – The authors have identified a spectrum of ecosystem archetypes that they call the Shark Tank, the Hornet’s Nest, the Wolf Pack and the Lion’s Pride. They analyze the success strategies for each. Originality/value – This article methodically diagrams the strategies for success in the emerging ecosystem economy. It identifies the key drivers of value in these new kinds of networks and offers corporate leaders actionable advice on how to position their firms in specific types of ecosystems.
11
Kalenov, О. Е. "Business-Model Transformation: from Classical Organization to Ecosystem." Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, no. 3 (May 13, 2020): 124–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2020-3-124-131.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Today’s business-environment is characterized by fast changes, serious diversity and tightening connection between its elements. These factors typical of this environment require new approaches to transformation of existing business-models. Perceiving conceptual description of entrepreneurial activity in the light of ecosystem, organizations can ensure their survival and at the same time raise the efficiency of their functioning. The article also studies processes of interaction and interdependence of organizations, their ecosystems and business-environment. The author identifies a number of characteristics, which are obligatory for ecosystem for successful functioning in the turbulent social and economic environment: heterogeneity, modality, redundancy, adaptation, pro-activity, confidentiality. Special attention during transformation processes of business-models towards ecosystems is paid to shaping a relative system of management, organizational structure and corporate culture. A specific role of the ecosystem leader is underlined, which determines its development and key rules of the ecosystem center (its driver) are shown and advantages of all its participants are described. The author characterizes the current stage of the ecosystem development and shows possible prospects of their shaping.
12
Orekhova, Svetlana, Vera Zarutskaya, and Yulia Bausova. "Social capital in the system of corporate sustainability." E3S Web of Conferences 208 (2020): 07004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020807004.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Social capital is a key factor in corporate sustainability in the ecosystem era. Analysis of the theoretical background reveals that social capital can function at all levels of economy – from the individual to the state. Therefore, social capitalis on the one hand an independent resource generating income. On the other hand, social capital provides access to the ecosystem actors’ resources.Oftentimes stakeholders underestimate social capital because of its intrinsic “public good” quality and limit investment in it. The ecosystem social capital structure includes several dimensions. The elements of each dimension are applied to strengthen the performance of corporate sustainability indicators.
13
Longo, Maria Cristina, and Sonia Caterina Giaccone. "Struggling with agency problems in open innovation ecosystem: corporate policies in innovation hub." TQM Journal 29, no. 6 (October 9, 2017): 881–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/tqm-02-2017-0020.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the topic of agency problems in service ecosystem for innovation. It specifically explores the corporate policies aimed at encouraging collaboration, so as to prevent opportunistic behaviors within the innovation hub, where service exchange is central for innovation creation. Design/methodology/approach The authors apply the agency theory framework to the hub as a service ecosystem in order to understand how it would be possible to address agency problems between the firm (principal) and the other actors of the hub (agents), involved in peer-to-peer interactions. The research explores the case study of a high-tech leading company, which is a pioneer in the use of the hub for supporting its innovation process. Data are collected through semi-structured interviews to some key informants of the Hub Program regarding structure and organization; participation; incentives and monitoring. Findings In service ecosystems, corporate policies are based on commitment, psycho-social incentives and social control may encourage collaboration among the actors, thus contributing to align their own interests to the hub’s innovation common goals. Research limitations/implications Given the exploratory nature of the research, the paper is based on a single case study. Thus, it is not possible to either generalize the results or evaluate any statistical correlation. Practical implications The paper provides a wider awareness about the benefits and risks related to service ecosystems for innovation, and advise both managers and practitioners about appropriate corporate policies to better address the agency problems. Originality/value This study enhances the literature on service ecosystems, highlighting the importance of corporate policies in preventing opportunistic behavior of actors in order to ensure the value co-creation process. It also extends the agency theory application to informal and not-hierarchical contexts. Besides, it suggests practitioners a way to reconcile the different interests of the firm and the other hub’s participants.
14
Bychkova, I. I. "Banking ecosystem: current trends in the financial sector." Scientific bulletin of the Southern Institute of Management, no. 1 (May 23, 2020): 42–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.31775/2305-3100-2020-1-42-46.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The article considers the stages of the banking industry evolution from the formation of the corporate business service market to the creation of ecosystems for retail customers. The prerequisites for the formation of ecosystems in Russia are identified and the factors hindering their development are identified. As a result of the research, the following conclusions are made: the transition to the stage of ecosystem formation is dictated by current consumer preferences; the consortium in the form of an ecosystem provides a number of undeniable advantages for its participants such as: building up the client base, differentiating investments, entering new industry niches, minimizing operating costs; the negative aspects of ecosystems from the point of view of the consortium’s functioning include: a high level of dependence on a related player, combining client bases and the risk of their leakage, low adaptability to the environment. The conclusion is also formed about the negative impact of ecosystems on the market of small and medium-sized businesses by monopolizing industries and washing the latter out of them.There is no conflict of interests.
15
Lee, Seul Kee, Jae Hyeung Kang, and Jung Min Nam. "The Effect of Entrepreneurs' Perception of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem on Corporate Performance through ESG Management." Korean Career, Entrepreneurship & Business Association 6, no. 4 (November 30, 2022): 43–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.48206/kceba.2022.6.4.43.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This study examined the relationship between entrepreneurial ecosystem awareness and ESG management and verified the effect on corporate performance. In order to achieve the research purpose, domestic and foreign prior studies and theories on research topics such as start-up ecosystem, ESG management, and corporate performance were comprehensively reviewed, and research models and hypotheses were established based on this. A survey was conducted on domestic start-ups to verify the research model, and empirical verification was conducted using SPSS 23.0 to analyze the collected data. The results of the empirical analysis in this study are summarized as follows. It was found that the recognition of the start-up ecosystem had a significant effect on ESG management, and ESG management had a significant effect on corporate performance. In particular, it was analyzed that the recognition of the start-up ecosystem had a significant effect on the financial performance and non-financial performance, which are corporate performance, through ESG management. Therefore, this study proposed to establish an environment where voluntary ESG management can be promoted by designing favorable policy measures and effective education programs such as supporting tax benefits and labor costs according to ESG achievement grades.
16
Ling, Chen. "The Impact of Corporate Venture Capital on Enterprise Value in China." Asian Trade Association 10, no. 1 (June 30, 2023): 55–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.22447/jatb.10.1.202306.55.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose – Chinese corporate venture capital has been particularly active in the Internet sector, with Tencent gradually expanding its business ecosystem through corporate venture capital activities. Therefore, this paper chooses Tencent as the case study object to discuss the influence of venture capital on the value creation of the platform-type business ecosystem, hoping to provide reference for China’s corporate venture capital practices. Design/Methodology/Approach – This paper takes Tencent’s corporate venture capital investment data from 2011 to 2022 as the research object, and uses case analysis, financial index analysis, and event analysis to demonstrate whether there is influence between corporate venture capital and enterprise value. Findings – Through the analysis of the investment motivation, investment mode, and investment projects of Tencent Group’s venture capital, the research results show that corporate venture capital can indeed have an impact on the strategic and financial values of enterprises. Research Implications – There are few studies on the venture capital activities of Internet platform enterprises in the existing literature. Based on two dimensions of strategic and financial value, this paper explores the value creation function of venture capital in the platform business ecosystem, and the research results have reference significance for the venture capital activities of other enterprises.
17
Lamont, Timothy A. C., Jos Barlow, Jan Bebbington, Thomas Cuckston, Rili Djohani, Rachael Garrett, Holly P. Jones, Tries B. Razak, and Nicholas A. J. Graham. "Hold big business to task on ecosystem restoration." Science 381, no. 6662 (September 8, 2023): 1053–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2610.
Повний текст джерела
18
Yang, Ta-Kai, and Min-Ren Yan. "The Corporate Shared Value for Sustainable Development: An Ecosystem Perspective." Sustainability 12, no. 6 (March 17, 2020): 2348. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12062348.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
While corporate social responsibility (CSR) is prevailing, the concept of creating shared value (CSV) by coordinating business activities and social concerns brings a great opportunity to transforming the business model for sustainable development. To better understand the systems comprising corporate shared value chains would be beneficial to economics, society, and sustainability. This study refers to the ecosystem as the theoretical lens in the exploration of the CSV components and contexts, and takes Macy’s as a focal case. In terms of academic contributions, this study generalizes the CSV components, including markets, social innovations, social performances, new business models, corporate entrepreneurship, and social network support. The research findings contribute to conceptualize and systemize the concept of CSV. In terms of practical contributions, the contexts for the operation of CSV, as summarized by this study, can serve as a template for corporate planning of CSV activities and sustainable development.
19
Yang, Ta-Kai, and Min-Ren Yan. "Exploring the Enablers of Strategic Orientation for Technology-Driven Business Innovation Ecosystems." Sustainability 11, no. 20 (October 18, 2019): 5779. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11205779.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The present study explores the impacts of corporate strategic orientation on innovation ecosystems through the perspective of systems thinking. Multiple-cases method was adopted to analyze three representative companies of different industries. In terms of academic contribution, the results of this study verify an innovation ecosystem model in a generalized manner, and find that market orientation, interaction orientation, and entrepreneurial orientation generate a positively reinforcing effect on the paths of the innovation ecosystem model in all phases, thus, diversifying the available literature of innovative ecosystems. In terms of practical contribution, this study presents a dynamic context of the development of new business, and describes the links between innovative activities and the market. Enterprises can refer to the proposed framework as well as strategic architecture in this study to effectively transform innovative activities into market performance.
20
Volosheniuk, L. V., N. I. Hornostai, and O. E. Mykhalchenkova. "Innovation ecosystem: concepts, functions, levels of innovation development." Science, technologies, innovation, no. 1(13) (2020): 3–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2020-1-01.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The concept of an innovation ecosystem has become commonplace and is increasingly included in official documents of countries and organizations, but it doesn’t have an unambiguous interpretation: representatives of various branches of science put different meanings into the concept of an innovation ecosystem. Nowadays, the concept of an innovation ecosystem is in the stage of cognition and identification. An innovation ecosystem is a term used to describe a large and diverse range of participants and resources that promote and are necessary for continuous innovation in a modern economy. The article reveals the essence, the basis of functioning and the concept of an innovation ecosystem by drawing an analogy between innovation and biological ecosystems. The authors highlighted the basic elements of the innovation ecosystem and their relationship at different stages of the innovation life cycle. A historical excursion into the emergence and formation of the concept of an innovation system, an innovation ecosystem is carried out. The definitions of the terms innovation system, and innovation ecosystem by various leading scientists from Ukraine and from around the globe are given. The authors also disclosed the principle of the innovation ecosystem formation at the levels of innovation development as: global (supranational), national, regional, corporate and individual. A detailed analysis (objective, framework, world examples) of each level of the innovation ecosystem is carried out. The authors also gave examples and principles of the formation of well-known, successful and productive innovation ecosystems of Ukraine such as: UNIT.City, Sikorsky Challenge, All-Ukrainian Innovation Festival, Science Park of Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University, Vernadsky Challenge, Interregional Technology Transfer Network (Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information).
21
Tihonova, T. "Approaches to measuring ecosystem services on a forest management territory." Proceedings of the Komi Science Centre of the Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 3 (July 13, 2022): 56–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.19110/1994-5655-2022-3-56-65.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Analysis of methodological techniques and examples of assessing ecosystem services as elements of natural capital has been the subject of the research. Identification of acceptable approaches for assessing key ecosystem services for the Komi Republic forest management area has been the purpose of the study. The forest sector is extremely important for the economic well-being of the region. In this regard, indicators of key services of forest ecosystems are considered and determined – biodiversity conservation, water protection and water regulation functions, and carbon dioxide absorption capacity. Two approaches are proposed for the measuring: regional (by forestry and districts) and corporate (by small river basins). The regional approach uses information from the Red Book of Russia and the Komi Republic, statistics, information on the forest management of forestries and the state of the environment in the region. The corporate one is based on more detailed indicators: the area of forests of high environmental value and key biotopes; quality characteristics of forests of small river basins on a rental area. The natural capital accounting should be the basis for the effective use of natural assets and for responsible and sustainable forest management.
22
Yatsenko, Valentyna. "SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE EDUCATIONAL ECOSYSTEM OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION UNDER CONDITIONS OF STRUCTURAL AND INNOVATIVE CHANGE." Management 33, no. 1 (August 27, 2021): 32–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.30857/2415-3206.2021.1.3.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES. Problems of social responsibility of higher education institution gain particular relevance not only due to changes in the content and conditions of its functioning, but also due to the transformation of many fundamental tenets of higher education institutions' activities. The close relationship between the concepts of "corporate social responsibility" and "educational organisation" manifests itself as the responsibility of the state for the state of the educational system in the country and the responsibility of the educational organisation for the quality of education to its stakeholders.METHODS. The study was based on the principles of corporate social responsibility, sustainability theory and stakeholder theory.FINDINGS. We propose an innovation ecosystem model for higher education institutions, which represents a new organisational integrity and modern way of producing innovation, implemented within a dynamic and adaptive mechanism that creates, consumes and transforms knowledge into innovative products, using a common innovation infrastructure and common rules among system participants, oriented towards their mutual benefit.CONCLUSION. The identified close relationship between the concepts of ecosystem, innovation ecosystem and business ecosystem made it possible to propose a model of innovative educational ecosystem of higher education institution as a complex self-organizing, self-regulating and self-developing system. The provisions on the need to integrate the principles of corporate social responsibility and the principles of innovative ecosystem functioning implemented in higher education institutions have been substantiated.
23
Tallamy, Douglas W. "Creating Living Landscapes: Why We Need to Increase Plant/Insect Linkages in Designed Landscapes." HortTechnology 27, no. 4 (August 2017): 446–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/horttech03699-17.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Specialized relationships between animals and plants are the norm in nature rather than the exception and landscape designs that destroy them also degrade local ecosystem function. Plants that evolved in concert with local animals provide for their needs better than plants that evolved elsewhere. The most common and arguably most important specialized relationships are those that have developed between insect herbivores and their host plants. Here, I explain why this is so, why specialized food relationships determine the stability and complexity of the local food webs that support animal diversity, and why our yards and gardens are essential parts of the ecosystems that sustain us. I also discuss how we can use our residential and corporate landscapes to connect the isolated habitat fragments around us and produce valuable ecosystem services, and what we can do to make our landscapes living ecosystems once again.
24
Jucevičius, Giedrius. "Knowledge Ecosystem Approach to Addressing the Wicked Problems." European Conference on Knowledge Management 23, no. 1 (August 25, 2022): 576–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/eckm.23.1.810.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Knowledge ecosystem is a relatively recent notion, which is primarily associated with the development of new knowledge through joint research and collaboration. They encompass the different actors that come together and search for new solutions and value propositions leading to the generation of new knowledge (Dattée, Alexy and Autio, 2018; Järvi, Almpanopoulou and Ritala, 2018). Knowledge ecosystems represent the networks of geographically co-located actors responsible for generating knowledge at the stage of pre-commercial engagement (Clarysse, 2014). The paper argues that the concept of knowledge ecosystems should not remain focused on public R&D-driven initiatives, but can be extended into the more complex social fields, such as addressing the “wicked problems” in multi-stakeholder environments. Wicked problems are characterized by the lack of clear problem definition and causality. They contain many inherent contradictions, complex stakeholder perspectives, and uncertain outcomes of intervention. The extant traditional research on addressing the wicked problems is dominated by the agent perspective (e.g. design thinking approach to resolving complex issues). In this paper, we argue that the effective tackling of the wicked problems owes primarily to the existence of effective ecosystems as platforms for accessing and managing the diverse social knowledge. We contrast the ecosystem-as-affiliation vs. ecosystem-as-structure approaches (Adner, 2017), and prefigurative vs. partial form of knowledge ecosystem (Järvi, Almpanopoulou, Ritala, 2018). The discussion presented in the paper shows that ecosystem-as-affiliation view and prefigurative form of KE is more suitable for addressing the complexity of wicked problems. On the other hand, the ecosystem-as-structure view and partial form of knowledge ecosystem is more appropriate for large corporate and public actors in search of the transdisciplinary solutions in a predefined area of expertise.
25
Narayan, Devika. "Monopolization and competition under platform capitalism: Analyzing transformations in the computing industry." New Media & Society 25, no. 2 (February 2023): 287–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14614448221149939.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Cross-disciplinary scholarship on platform-mediated transformations is growing rapidly. Large-scale data centers that aggregate hardware resources are an important element shaping the expansion of platform economies. The impact of this configuration of hardware on the dynamics of software development is still unclear. Data centers aggregate and centralize computing capacity and in turn enable the growth of globally distributed and organizationally decentralized corporate ecosystems. Scholarship in this area is beginning to examine the relations between dominant technology corporations and their networks of users and third-party companies. I contribute to literature on platform ecosystems by examining changing organizational and market dynamics introduced by cloud computing within the corporate computing sector. Drawing on qualitative interviews with managers of software startups in India, I focus on falling barriers to entry, new organizational forms, and emergent transnational dimensions. Using this case, I theorize monopolization as being embedded in competitive ecosystem dynamics.
26
Polasky, Stephen, Heather Tallis, and Belinda Reyers. "Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, no. 24 (June 15, 2015): 7356–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406490112.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Progress in ecosystem service science has been rapid, and there is now a healthy appetite among key public and private sector decision makers for this science. However, changing policy and management is a long-term project, one that raises a number of specific practical challenges. One impediment to broad adoption of ecosystem service information is the lack of standards that define terminology, acceptable data and methods, and reporting requirements. Ecosystem service standards should be tailored to specific use contexts, such as national income and wealth accounts, corporate sustainability reporting, land-use planning, and environmental impact assessments. Many standard-setting organizations already exist, and the research community will make the most headway toward rapid uptake of ecosystem service science by working directly with these organizations. Progress has been made in aligning with existing organizations in areas such as product certification and sustainability reporting, but a major challenge remains in mainstreaming ecosystem service information into core public and private use contexts, such as agricultural and energy subsidy design, national income accounts, and corporate accounts.
27
J. Zhao, Jensen, and Sherry Y. Zhao. "THE IMPACT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL MEDIA ON REVENUE AND PROFIT: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY." INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 10, no. 3 (August 28, 2014): 1892–902. http://dx.doi.org/10.24297/ijmit.v10i3.1643.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The growing popularity of social media has fundamentally altered the business ecosystem where companies can no longer solely capture consumers attention via reach; instead, companies must focus on engaging consumers in product and service development and improvement. This exploratory study details how the corporate strategic use of social media relates to corporate revenue and profit among Fortune 500 corporations. The findings indicate that the proper corporate use of social media impacts positively the corporate revenue and profit; whereas the improper corporate use of social media affects negatively the corporate revenue and profit.
28
Aini, Qurotul, Danny Manongga, Untung Rahardja, Irwan Sembiring, and Rifan Efendy. "Innovation and Key Benefits of Business Models in Blockchain Companies." Blockchain Frontier Technology 2, no. 2 (October 14, 2022): 24–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.34306/bfront.v2i2.161.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Existing business models are changed and disrupted by blockchain technology, which warrants more research. This study tries to describe the phenomena of blockchain technology in relation to business model innovation in the enterprise ecosystem on the basis of that. Blockchain technology has been shown to increase organizational performance empirically. The value system concept is used in this study to explain this phenomena. This study employs a multiple-case study to respond to research questions using abductive reasoning. Overall, the outcomes According to this study, blockchain technology benefits an organization in four different ways: I value capture through higher profitability; (ii) value creation through private partnerships; (iii) value delivery through smart contracts; and (iv) value proposition that drives value by raising the organization's business value through operational improvements. This report also suggests a blockchain ecosystem with various private and consortium organizations. Private ecosystem focused on internal organizational performance enhancement within one corporate enterprise. The consortium ecosystem, on the other hand, is focused on fostering corporate cooperation.
29
Ferdinand, Jan-Peter, and Uli Meyer. "The social dynamics of heterogeneous innovation ecosystems." International Journal of Engineering Business Management 9 (January 1, 2017): 184797901772161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1847979017721617.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
In this article, we develop a programmatic notion of innovation ecosystems, which emphasizes the analysis of different forms of distributed innovation without reducing the perspective to the role of a focal organization. It highlights relationships between communities and corporate firms as nexus for distributed innovation and elaborates how different facets of openness shape the dynamic of the ecosystem. Thus, our model allows for the analysis and comparison of a broad scope of constellations, their particular coordinating mechanisms as well as related advantages and disadvantages. We apply this framework to two specific cases of distributed innovation, the RepRap 3D printer and the ARA modular smartphone, in order to delineate how differences in the forms of openness affect the prevalent relationships between communities and firms as well as the constituting functions of their particular innovation ecosystem.
30
Gavrilov, S. N. "Formation of the conceptual and terminological basis of the information (digital) ecosystem of the legal profession." Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)), no. 11 (January 14, 2021): 44–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2020.75.11.044-053.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The article substantiates the need to form and update the harmonized terminological conceptual apparatus of the legal profession in the context of its digital transformation.The author believes that the presence of the goal of making information (digital) ecosystem of the legal profession in Russia is necessary to speak not only about the linguistic support of developed corporate information systems, but about creating an enterprise conceptual-terminological system of advocacy in which the linguistic support of information (digital) component of corporate life is only organic, integrated part of this system terms.In this regard, the conceptual and terminological basis of the information (digital) ecosystem of the legal profession is considered as part of the General term system of the lawyer Corporation. The author defi nes corporate language as the lexicon used by representatives of the legal community in professional activities, corporate governance, and other interaction related to belonging to the bar.The author highlights the following elements of the process of forming the conceptual and terminological basis of advocacy: organizing and conducting scientifi c research enterprise language advocacy; identify subject areas and sources conceptual and terminological system of advocacy; development of methodological and methodical bases for organization of corporate terminology work and the construction of a corporate terminology system; the development of a corporate terminology policy advocacy; development and implementation of enterprise systems (mechanisms, procedures) ensuring the formation of corporate terminological system and the maintenance of the single practice of its application; creating and updating corporate of the terminological dictionary of the legal profession; unifi cation of local normative base of the legal profession in terms of corporate usage.The article describes the elements of the process of forming the conceptual and terminological basis of the legal profession.
31
Gao, Daquan, Christina W. Y. Wong, and Kee-hung Lai. "Development of Ecosystem for Corporate Green Innovation: Resource Dependency Theory Perspective." Sustainability 15, no. 6 (March 20, 2023): 5450. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15065450.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Although research on green innovation has increased dramatically in recent years, little is known about the system mechanisms for the innovation. Grounded in the resource dependency theory (RDT) and national innovation system (NIS) literature, this study examines the ecosystem in promoting green innovation from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. This study constructs a Nash-Cournot equilibrium to address the effects of national green innovation systems on corporate green innovation. Using data of 2136 A-share listed enterprises, 31 provincial-level R&D data, and 329 prefectural-level government annual work reports in China, this study finds that corporate collaboration, government subsidies, regional university R&D intensity, long-term credit, and government attention enhance the number of green innovation patents and patent diversity. Government attention strengthens the positive effects of corporate R&D cooperation, government subsidies, R&D intensity of regional research institutions, and long-term credit on the number of green innovation patents.
32
Zaharov, D., and A. Lobacheva. "Organization HR-Ecosystem Formation and Development." Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia 9, no. 1 (April 10, 2020): 23–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/2305-7807-2020-23-26.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article discusses the organization’s HR-ecosystem formation. The concept of HR-ecosystem, goals, tasks, and system key elements is studied. In order to form an HR-ecosystem, organizations are forced to use the partner companies’ services, enter into agreements with other companies in various fields of activity, and create new subsidiaries within their organizational structure. The article also deals with the workers corporate health concept, including wealth creation, communication, Hobbies, education, career, and health worker. The personnel management mechanisms of various employment models are proposed: employees, freelancers, and gig workers.
33
Filin, S. A., A. Zh Yakushev, A. V. Kolesnikov, V. A. Kozlov, and M. I. Maksimov. "STRATEGIC AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE BANKING SECTOR." EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE: PROBLEMY, RESHENIYA 3, no. 10 (2021): 106–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2021.10.03.011.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The article considers ecosystem processes taking place in the Russian banking industry. Banks play a crucial role in the economies of countries, they help in maintaining monetary policy, stability of the financial system as a whole.
34
Fujita, Masanori, Takato Okudo, and Hiromi Nagane. "Analyzing business ecosystem through corporate networks based on capital relations." Procedia CIRP 99 (2021): 692–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.092.
Повний текст джерела
35
Small, Angela, Sally V. Russell, and Jouni Paavola. "Corporate Environmental Sustainability and Ecosystem Services: A 21st Century Solution?" Academy of Management Proceedings 2019, no. 1 (August 1, 2019): 12858. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.239.
Повний текст джерела
36
Kareiva, Peter M., Brynn W. McNally, Steve McCormick, Tom Miller, and Mary Ruckelshaus. "Improving global environmental management with standard corporate reporting." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, no. 24 (June 16, 2015): 7375–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408120111.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Multinational corporations play a prominent role in shaping the environmental trajectory of the planet. The integration of environmental costs and benefits into corporate decision-making has enormous, but as yet unfulfilled, potential to promote sustainable development. To help steer business decisions toward better environmental outcomes, corporate reporting frameworks need to develop scientifically informed standards that consistently consider land use and land conversion, clean air (including greenhouse gas emissions), availability and quality of freshwater, degradation of coastal and marine habitats, and sustainable use of renewable resources such as soil, timber, and fisheries. Standardization by itself will not be enough—also required are advances in ecosystem modeling and in our understanding of critical ecological thresholds. With improving ecosystem science, the opportunity for realizing a major breakthrough in reporting corporate environmental impacts and dependencies has never been greater. Now is the time for ecologists to take advantage of an explosion of sustainability commitments from business leaders and expanding pressure for sustainable practices from shareholders, financial institutions, and consumers.
37
Busquets, Javier. "Multiasistencia: Transforming the Digital Ecosystem." Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases 8, no. 2 (November 2018): 97–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41266-017-0029-z.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Multiasistencia was an ecosystem in 2017 managing a network-based service called the “Comprehensive Claim Management Service” (CCMS). The firm offered home repair services to its 100 Corporate Clients (Financial Institutions and Insurance Companies) which attended to some 8 Million end customers, managing a network of some 6.000 Trade Professionals (SME and self-employee). The service was supported by an advanced digital platform to coordinate all actions in that ecosystem. The case shows the challenges of digitalization, namely (1) new digital entrants, (2) the Smart Home trends, (3) the digital effects on banking, and (4) the demand of personalization. Those strategic changes lead to Multiasistencia to create a Digital Hub to manage Big Data so placing students on the managerial situation to decide priorities in business model, processes, and new ways to grow.
38
Guerry, Anne D., Stephen Polasky, Jane Lubchenco, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Gretchen C. Daily, Robert Griffin, Mary Ruckelshaus, et al. "Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, no. 24 (June 16, 2015): 7348–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503751112.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The central challenge of the 21st century is to develop economic, social, and governance systems capable of ending poverty and achieving sustainable levels of population and consumption while securing the life-support systems underpinning current and future human well-being. Essential to meeting this challenge is the incorporation of natural capital and the ecosystem services it provides into decision-making. We explore progress and crucial gaps at this frontier, reflecting upon the 10 y since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. We focus on three key dimensions of progress and ongoing challenges: raising awareness of the interdependence of ecosystems and human well-being, advancing the fundamental interdisciplinary science of ecosystem services, and implementing this science in decisions to restore natural capital and use it sustainably. Awareness of human dependence on nature is at an all-time high, the science of ecosystem services is rapidly advancing, and talk of natural capital is now common from governments to corporate boardrooms. However, successful implementation is still in early stages. We explore why ecosystem service information has yet to fundamentally change decision-making and suggest a path forward that emphasizes: (i) developing solid evidence linking decisions to impacts on natural capital and ecosystem services, and then to human well-being; (ii) working closely with leaders in government, business, and civil society to develop the knowledge, tools, and practices necessary to integrate natural capital and ecosystem services into everyday decision-making; and (iii) reforming institutions to change policy and practices to better align private short-term goals with societal long-term goals.
39
Bystryakov, Igor, and Dmitry Klynovyi. "BYSUNESS-ECOSYSTEM CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT." Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, no. 8(27) (2020): 21–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689/2020/8(27)/3.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The purpose of the article is to define an innovative concept of sustainable management based on the analysis of the institutional configuration of business ecosystem entities. The concept of sustainable (SUST) management is outlined as the creation of conditions for multi-entity management of territorial capital on the basis of digital platform technologies and the principles of partnership between government, business and the population. The institutional configuration of territorial business ecosystems is analyzed. It is determined that the business-ecosystem organization of economic activity is a flexible and dynamic system that creates opportunities for the integration of natural resources into economic circulation in territorial communities. It is established that there is a need for a radical restructuring of the institutional configuration of the spatial management system of natural resources in the direction of creating a system of multi-entity management of territorial capital. The main institutions and institutes of the spatial system of natural resources management of the territorial business ecosystem are outlined, in the field of local government, public-private partnership, corporate-platform and structural-project management, etc., within which economic actors of business ecosystems are endowed with appropriate functions and powers.. The structure of the business-ecosystem concept of sustainable management is detailed, including the basic formats of institutionalization of territorial assets management, informational and communicational platform component and management mechanisms of sustainable management, which are focused on creating a system of multi-entity management of sustainable development of territorial communities. Basic formats and forms of institutionalization of territorial assets management in the conditions of decentralization of power are proposed, including communication platforms of collaborative interactions between public authorities, business and population, as well as a set of mechanisms of structural and project management of sustainable development of territorial communities.
40
Guntara, Denny. "Criminal Liability against Business Entities Committing Forest Burning in the Perspective of the Development of Environmental Criminal Law." International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies 1, no. 1 (December 28, 2021): 129–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.32996/ijahs.2021.1.1.19.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This study aims to investigate issues on how corporate deforestation (by fire) occurs and the responsibilities of business entities for the crime they have committed. Employing the descriptive method, this study relied on secondary data. Destruction of forests has impacted many sectors, e.g., environment, economics, institutional, socio-politics, and others associated with accessibility and biodiversity of forest resources. Such an issue blames factors, such as illegal logging, forest fires, poor monitoring and management of operationalization of the licensing system in forest areas, conversion of forest to plantations, and settlements and other non-forestry development agendas. Corporate deforestation, which is mainly aimed to open new space, is a form of intolerable criminal act given its detrimental effect on the ecosystem and public health. As the one that is responsible for any actions, corporates or business entities are urged to monitor all of their agendas and development. This notion, however, seems insufficient to address the issue of corporate deforestation since legal consequences have little to no effect in reducing primary forest loss.
41
Gileva, T. A., A. V. Babkin, and G. A. Gilev. "Developing a Strategy for the Digital Transformation of an Enterprise with Allowance for the Capabilities of Business Ecosystems." Economics and Management 26, no. 6 (August 25, 2020): 629–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-6-629-642.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The presented study analyzes the processes of creating ecosystems in the context of external challenges and increasing the level of competitive market environment and global digitalization of business to develop a strategy for the digital transformation of an enterprise.Aim. The study aims to assess the practicability of creating ecosystems when developing a strategy for the digital transformation of traditional (“defensive”) enterprises and to provide recommendations for their utilization.Tasks. The authors analyze the characteristics, features, and typology of business ecosystems; substantiate the need to analyze and use the capabilities of business ecosystems in the development of a strategy for corporate development in the digital environment; describe the essence, key aspects of development, and propose a modular structure for the strategy of the digital transformation of an enterprise; develop a conceptual framework for the strategic management of the digital transformation of an enterprise; formulate recommendations for selecting ecosystems that would enhance the enterprise’s competitiveness.Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition in various aspects to propose approaches and a conceptual model of the corporate digital transformation strategy with allowance for the capabilities of business ecosystems.Results. The authors show that in the context of the developing digital economy, business ecosystems have become a new way to organize economic activity due to their high efficiency and rapid scaling. There are two major types of ecosystems: centralized (transaction) ecosystems in the form of digital platforms and adaptive (solution) ecosystems formed by the orchestrating company to create a new value proposition by joint efforts of partners from various industries through direct interaction with each other. The study identifies stages in the development of a digital transformation strategy based on enhancing the enterprise’s competitiveness through its participation in the ecosystem(s) and formulate recommendations for selecting ecosystems that would improve the efficiency of the enterprise.Conclusions. Ecosystem development is a business trend that determines the competitiveness of enterprises and improves the efficiency of their operation in the digital environment. Therefore, under modern conditions, an enterprise should develop its digital transformation strategy based on the creation and/or use of business ecosystems.
42
Denning, Stephen. "Mastering the challenge of business ecosystems." Strategy & Leadership 49, no. 4 (July 15, 2021): 9–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sl-06-2021-0057.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The author discusses the challenges of implementing a digital ecosystem, a way of transcending the boundaries of a firm to include additional producers to provide more value to customers and also by making customers active partners. Design/methodology/approach An ecosystem is intentionally organized to generate, facilitate and benefit from interactions rather than transactions. Findings The author explains how firms can make the customers active participants in creating and evolving the network by embracing the dynamic concept of an ecosystem. Practical/implications The ecosystem becomes more valuable to users as more users join. Originality/value Essential reading for executives experimenting with corporate digital platforms.
43
Kokhan, Marianna, and Anastasiya Mazur. "Regional determinants in the development of the Lviv startup ecosystem." Regional Economy, no. 4(94) (2019): 74–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2019-4-6.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The article considers the concept of startups and ecosystems of startup development. It investigates the innovativeness ratings of countries and regional ecosystems of startups and the factors influencing the successful development of startups. The article considers the ranking of the best regional startup ecosystems in the world. It covers the experience of the leading regions, whose effectiveness is driven by attention to financing, networking, expanding access to markets, attracting and nurturing talents, accumulating experience and scientific development. Particular attention is given to the impact of the specialization and effectiveness of the regional focus strategy. Based on the methodology and results of the Global Startup Ecosystem Ranking 2019, authors have empirically investigated the startup ecosystem of the Lviv city. Authors described and systemized the startups operating in the city, the elements, and dynamics of the urban startup infrastructure. The preconditions for successful development of startups - financing, talents, experience, connectedness, access to markets - have been identified. The effectiveness of the activity of city authorities, the local policy of promoting the startup environment development - documents, measures and results – have been investigated. The main factors of Lviv’s regional leadership in the development of digital startups in Ukraine are: the dynamic development of the IT industry, the development of digital competencies and the concentration of talent in leading universities, the development of corporate universities and innovative infrastructure, the development of infrastructure and comfort in the city. For the development of the Lviv startup ecosystem, it is recommended to focus the efforts on further accumulation and transfer of experience, retention of talents, improvement of technology transfer systems, focusing on areas of exclusive competence while expanding access to finance and the global market.
44
Campbell, Bryan, and Michel Magnan. "Whither IPOs? Toward an Ecosystem Perspective on Corporate Financing: A Commentary." Accounting Perspectives 17, no. 1 (March 2018): 109–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12159.
Повний текст джерела
45
D’Amato, D., N. Li, M. Rekola, A. Toppinen, and F.-F. Lu. "Linking forest ecosystem services to corporate sustainability disclosure: A conceptual analysis." Ecosystem Services 14 (August 2015): 170–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.017.
Повний текст джерела
46
Banc, Constance, and Karim Messeghem. "Discovering the entrepreneurial micro‐ecosystem: The case of a corporate accelerator." Thunderbird International Business Review 62, no. 5 (July 5, 2020): 593–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tie.22159.
Повний текст джерела
47
Bachev, H., and G. Kharlamova. "MECHANISMS AND MODES OF GOVERNANCE OF AGRO-ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN BULGARIA." Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, no. 217 (2021): 6–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2021/217-4/1.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The products and the variety of direct and indirect benefits that humans receive from nature and the various ecosystems are commonly known as ecosystem services. Agricultural ecosystems of different types and their specific “agro-ecosystem” services are among the most widespread in the world. In recent years increasing attention is given to the system of (“good”) governance as a key to achieving public, collective, corporate, and private goals in relation to conservation and improvement of (agro)ecosystem services. Nevertheless, in Bulgaria, like in many other countries, there are few studies on the specific mechanisms, modes, factors, and efficiency of agro-ecosystem survives governance. This article presents the initial results of a large-scale study on the governance of diverse ecosystem services in Bulgarian agriculture. Firstly, it identifies the type, amount, and importance of various ecosystem services maintained and “produced” by the Bulgarian farms. The study has found out that country’s farms provide a great number of essential ecosystem services among which provisioning food and feed, and conservation of elements of the natural environment prevail. Secondly, it identifies and assesses the efficiency and complementarities of specific modes and mechanisms of governance of ecosystem services used by agricultural holdings. The study has found out that a great variety of private, market, collective, public and hybrid modes of governance of farm activity related to agroecosystem services are applied. There is significant differentiation of employed managerial forms depending on the type of ecosystem services and the specialization of agricultural farms. Furthermore, the management of agroecosystem services is associated with a considerable increase in the production and transaction costs of participating farms as well as big socio-economic and environmental effects for agricultural holdings and other parties. The factors that mostly stimulate the activity of agricultural producers in Bulgaria for protection of (agro)ecosystems services are participation in public support programs, access to farmers’ advice, professional training, available information, and innovation received direct subsidies from the EU and national government, personal conviction and satisfaction, positive experience of others, long-term and immediate benefits for the farm, and integration with suppliers, buyers, and processors. The suggested holistic and interdisciplinary framework for analyzing the system of governance of agro-ecosystem services is to be further extended and improved, and more widely and periodically applied in the future. The latter requires systematic indepth multidisciplinary research in this new area, as well as the collection of original micro- and macro information on ecosystem survives, forms, efficiency, and factors of their management. The accuracy of analyzes is to be improved by increasing representativeness through enlarging the number of surveyed farms and related agents, applying statistical methods, special “training” of participants, etc. as well as improving the official system for collecting agricultural, agro-economic, and agrienvironmental information in the country.
48
Tolstykh, Tatyana, Nadezhda Shmeleva, Leyla Gamidullaeva, and Victoria Krasnobaeva. "The Role of Collaboration in the Development of Industrial Enterprises Integration." Sustainability 15, no. 9 (April 25, 2023): 7180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15097180.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Organizational models for corporate horizontal merger based on partnership, mutual benefit and synergy could act as a driver and a “window of opportunity” for companies seeking to combine the objectives of economic resilience, technological independence and compliance with the environmental, social and governance principles. This article proposes an approach to analyzing the potentials of enterprises and actors in terms of collaboration maturity and evaluation thereof for the potential formation of industrial symbioses and industrial innovation ecosystems. The authors’ proposals have been tested when assessing collaboration maturity of the participants in the industrial symbiosis for phosphogypsum recycling, as well as when assessing collaboration maturity of the actors in Safer Phosphates industrial innovation ecosystem. The development of collaboration between enterprises through an increase in the number of joint innovative technological and environmental projects tends to develop into industrial ecosystems, when knowledge about new produced or promising options for the exchange of resources will be transferred between regional enterprises and attract new actors from other territories and sectors of the economy. Such interaction will provide a long-term development strategy for each actor, and commercial and image benefits will make ecosystem symbiotic interaction a priority for all market participants.
49
Ruban, Maksim D. "Digital Business Ecosystems as a Growth Driver for Startups." Journal of Modern Competition 16, no. 4 (August 31, 2022): 85–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-4-85-94.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Having appeared relatively recently, digital ecosystems have become an indispensable strategic tool for the development of large businesses by attracting new and retaining old consumers of digital services. The author of the article views digital business ecosystems as an opportunity for rapid economic growth for startups. The relevance of the work lies in the insufficient study in the scientific literature of the participation of startups in the activities of digital ecosystems of large businesses, as well as in their active influence on the business environment as creators of innovations. The aim of the work is to develop theoretical and practical knowledge for both startups and their counterparties, owners of digital business ecosystems. The main task is to develop management solutions for startups in terms of joining the ecosystem of a major partner. Business ecosystems in this paper act as a new direction for the implementation of the strategy of mergers and acquisitions for the owners of the considered digital business tool. The database of the study was compiled by the characteristics and features of the activity of large business ecosystems in Russia and the world in terms of activating the merger and acquisition strategy through a qualitative analysis of their non-financial statements and press releases. As a result, there are revealed the advantages and disadvantages of digital business ecosystems using this business model, there are highlighted the features of the economic development of startups, their characteristics required to enter the ecosystem of big business and carried out a SWOT analysis of the integration of a startup into a digital ecosystem, correlating all the results in a matrix (a tool for making strategic management decisions), which, depending on the orientation of the development of a startup, points to such decisions as integration (full merger), integration with intellectual property rights, dual leadership and corporate venture capital. The practical results of this work can be used by researchers of digital business ecosystems, as well as by owners of startups planning to enter large business ecosystems, and by owners of such ecosystems.
50
Choi, Jong-in, and Stephen Markham. "Creating a Corporate Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The Case of Entrepreneurship Education in the RTP, USA." Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 5, no. 3 (August 23, 2019): 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030062.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Today’s dynamic and complex environment means that companies are trying to develop entrepreneurial thinking as a competitive advantage. Universities around the world are simultaneously increasing entrepreneurial training across a broad array of majors. However, the entrepreneurial training is not heavily connected to industry needs. This paper focuses on how industry and universities can cooperate to prepare students for corporate entrepreneurial thinking. The research is based on extensive literature, reports, and in-depth interviews with 28 people from various parts of the RTP (Research Triangle Park), including companies, government agencies, and numerous programs at multiple universities. The major finding from this study is that the strength of entrepreneurial education in the regional innovation system reinforces the companies’ open innovation capacity and their performance. To be successful at launching campus-wide entrepreneurship education to increase understanding of corporate entrepreneurship, Corporate Entrepreneurship Education (CEE) must include (1) entrepreneurial leadership; (2) faculty champions; (3) student-focused policies; (4) engagement with the community; and (5) a decentralized, autonomous structure of entrepreneurship programs.