Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Conservation – Tanzania"

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Conservation – Tanzania".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Conservation – Tanzania"

1

Seeteram, Nadia A., Pendo T. Hyera, Lulu T. Kaaya, Makarius C. S. Lalika, and Elizabeth P. Anderson. "Conserving Rivers and Their Biodiversity in Tanzania." Water 11, no. 12 (December 11, 2019): 2612. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w11122612.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The United Republic of Tanzania (Tanzania) is rich in freshwater resources and biodiversity. In this article, we highlight the importance of Tanzanian rivers and make a case for the conservation of the freshwater and terrestrial species that rely on these rivers. We provide an overview of current knowledge on Tanzanian rivers and discuss progress towards implementation of the National Water Policy (2002) and Water Management Act (2009), two legislative instruments that have motivated environmental flow assessments on at least six major rivers and offer legal backing for river conservation. We examine major challenges that pose significant threats to water security for river ecosystems and humans in Tanzania, among those: (1) human population growth, (2) agricultural expansion, (3) river flow alterations, (4) industrialization, (5) introduced species, and (6) climate change. We conclude by offering recommendations for future river conservation efforts in Tanzania.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Burgess, Neil D., Alex Dickinson, and Nicholas H. Payne. "Tanzanian coastal forests – new information on status and biological importance." Oryx 27, no. 3 (July 1993): 169–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0030605300027976.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This paper presents the current results of a continuing survey of the distribution, status and biological importance of Tanzanian coastal forests. The Frontier-Tanzania Coastal Forest Research Programme has shown that at least 34 locations, and possibly another eight, support important coastal forests. There are probably 350–500 sq km of forest remaining, with most sites smaller than 20 sq km. Most sites, and 75–85 per cent of the total area, are located in Forest Reserves. Coastal forest supports many endemic taxa and many individual forests support species and subspecies known from nowhere else. All these forests are severely threatened and effective conservation action is a priority. The Frontier-Tanzania project findings are contributing to conservation programmes co-ordinated by the Wildlife Conservation Society of Tanzania and the World Wide Fund for Nature (Tanzania).
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Mwalyosi, R. B. B. "Wildlife conservation in Tanzania." JOURNAL OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL ASSOCIATION OF TANZANIA 27 (July 7, 2021): 23–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.56279/jgat.v27i.54.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Boone, Randall B., Kathleen A. Galvin, Philip K. Thornton, David M. Swift, and Michael B. Coughenour. "Cultivation and Conservation in Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania." Human Ecology 34, no. 6 (July 28, 2006): 809–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9031-3.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Abihudi, Siri A., Hugo J. De Boer, and Anna C. Treydte. "Conservation status revision and communities’ perceptions of 22 Aloe species in Tanzania." Plant Ecology and Evolution 154, no. 3 (November 23, 2021): 391–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2021.1838.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Background and aims – Many Aloe species are globally threatened due to overharvesting for trade and habitat destruction. CITES regulates their international trade. In Tanzania, 50% of all existing Aloe species had previously been assessed, though some of these assessments were Data Deficient. For those with sufficient data, an update is required as the rate of decline has rapidly increased over the last years. Material and methods – We estimated Area of Occupancy (AOO), Extent of Occurrence (EOO), and number of locations for 22 Tanzanian Aloe species using the Geospatial Conservation Assessment software (GeoCAT). We assessed the reasons leading to their decline based on direct field observations and community perceptions. Key results – We revised the conservation status of 22 Aloe species; two were assessed as Critically Endangered, ten as Endangered, five as Vulnerable, and five as Least Concern. We re-discovered the Critically Endangered Aloe boscawenii, which had not been seen in Tanzania for more than six decades. We propose to downgrade the endemic Aloe dorotheae, Aloe leptosiphon, and Aloe flexilifolia from Critically Endangered to a lower threat level. The community perception on Aloe species availability did not accurately reflect their categorisation based on the IUCN criteria B. We identified agricultural activities and climate change effects as the two main threats to Tanzanian Aloe species.Conclusion – We conclude that overall numbers are declining for 22 Aloe species in Tanzania, mainly due to human activities. We recommend the implementation of laws and policies to protect their natural habitats.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Gamassa, Pascal Kany Prud'ome. "Legal Protection of the Marine Environment from Vessel-Source Oil Pollution: Progress and Challenges in Tanzania." Journal of African Law 66, no. 1 (October 21, 2021): 123–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s002185532100036x.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
AbstractThe United Republic of Tanzania, also called Tanzania, is a country composed of Mainland Tanzania and the islands of Zanzibar. Tanzania's domestic laws promote sustainable development of the marine environment; however, since the beginning of the 21st century, the country has been importing large quantities of oil, resulting in an increased risk of vessel-source oil pollution damage. Through a comparative analysis, this article examines the laws addressing this issue in Mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar, the progress that has been made in the legal environment and the challenges that remain, and it discusses possible solutions and improvements. The article reveals that weak implementation of domestic laws for marine environment conservation, a lack of harmonization between domestic laws regarding this issue, and weak domestication of relevant ratified international conventions are among the challenges currently hindering the sustainability of Tanzania's marine environment.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Orozco-Quintero, Alejandra, and Leslie King. "A cartography of dispossession: assessing spatial reorganization in state-led conservation in Saadani, Tanzania." Journal of Political Ecology 25, no. 1 (February 13, 2018): 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/v25i1.22007.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Proclaimed as the "most important conservation success story", protected areas have become the preferred method among state signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity for addressing conservation challenges. However, state-governed protected areas have been criticized for their failure to achieve ecological and social goals. Reaching a consensus on wildlife conservation strategies has not translated into widespread acceptance of state-governed protected areas by local communities. Critics debate whether the state is sincere and efficient when exerting spatial control. This article analyses state-based conservation in the Saadani landscape in Tanzania, exploring the nature of spatial reorganization and institutional approaches guiding the establishment of protected areas. Spatial reorganization and the actions of conservation organizations have led to the disenfranchisement of the very people whose efforts had enabled biodiversity to be conserved. This is despite an apparent shift in the nature of Tanzania's conservation policies towards more participatory approaches. Through detailing mechanisms used by the state for exerting spatial control in Saadani, we highlight how the approach has been counterproductive for satisfying the country's commitment to the Aichi framework on biodiversity targets and has undermined grassroots backing for conservation. In the context of strong support from the international conservation organizations for Tanzania's conservation efforts, this suggests the need for reassessing global conservation policies and identifying urgent measures and effective mechanisms to protect rights to territory and ancestral tenure in places targeted for conservation.Keywords: conservation, Convention on Biological Diversity, protected areas, spatial reorganization, actions of the state, Saadani, TANAPA, Tanzania. Uvinje
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Davenport, Tim R. B., Katarzyna Nowak, and Andrew Perkin. "Priority Primate Areas in Tanzania." Oryx 48, no. 1 (July 17, 2013): 39–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0030605312001676.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
AbstractPriority Primate Areas are identified in Tanzania, mainland Africa's most important country for conservation of primates, on the basis of occupancy by globally rare, Red-Listed and range-restricted primate species and subspecies. We provide a comprehensive list and regional assessment of Tanzania's primate taxa, using IUCN Red List criteria, as well as the first national inventory of primates for 62 sites. The Priority Primate Areas, encompassing 102,513 km2, include nine national parks, one conservation area, seven game reserves, six nature reserves, 34 forest reserves and five areas with no official protection status. Primate species were evaluated and ranked on the basis of irreplaceability and vulnerability, using a combination of established and original criteria, resulting in a primate Taxon Conservation Score. Sites were ranked on the basis of summed primate scores. The majority (71%) of Priority Primate Areas are also Important Bird Areas (IBAs), or part of an IBA. Critical subsets of sites were derived through complementarity analyses. Adequate protection of just nine sites, including six national parks (Kilimanjaro, Kitulo, Mahale, Saadani, Udzungwa and Jozani-Chwaka Bay), one nature reserve (Kilombero) and two forest reserves (Minziro and Mgambo), totalling 8,679 km2, would protect all 27 of Tanzania's primate species. The addition of three forest reserves (Rondo, Kilulu Hill and Ngezi) and two game reserves (Grumeti and Biharamulo), results in a list of 14 Priority Primate Areas covering 10,561 km2 (1.1% of Tanzania's total land area), whose conservation would ensure the protection of all 43 of Tanzania's species and subspecies of primates.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Gardner, Benjamin. "Elite discourses of conservation in Tanzania." Social Semiotics 27, no. 3 (March 21, 2017): 348–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1301799.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Mgeni, A. S. M. "Soil conservation in Kondoa district, Tanzania." Land Use Policy 2, no. 3 (July 1985): 205–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0264-8377(85)90068-7.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Дисертації з теми "Conservation – Tanzania"

1

Jacobs, Zoe M. "African Elephant (Loxodonta Africana) Conservation in Tanzania." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2015. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/568.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Increasing human population and development in Africa restricts land and resources for African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and threatens the preservation of the species. Despite the importance of conservation for many governments in Africa, many local communities have negative views of elephants and exhibit anti-conservation behavior. By looking at the history of wildlife policy in Tanzania, this paper seeks to understand these opinions through a historical context. Three case studies of conservation initiatives were evaluated to determine what aspects of conservation initiatives promote long-term pro-conservation behavior on the part of the local community. Ultimately, conservation initiatives should establish a framework whereby local communities are empowered through conservation.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Bergin, Patrick. "Conservation and development : the institutionalisation of community conservation in Tanzania National Parks." Thesis, University of East Anglia, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.296310.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Sesabo, Jennifer Kasanda. "Marine resources conservation and poverty reduction strategies in Tanzania." Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer, 2006. http://deposit.d-nb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=2944300&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Sesabo, Jennifer Kasanda. "Marine resources conservation and poverty reduction strategies in Tanzania /." Berlin [u.a.] : Springer, 2007. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0713/2007923291.html.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Smith, Wynet. "The use, abundance and conservation of woody species in the Batemi Valley, northwestern Tanzania /." Thesis, McGill University, 1993. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=69667.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The Batemi are an agropastoral group who inhabit a semi-arid area in Northwestern Tanzania. The group lives a traditional subsistence lifestyle and are therefore dependent on the resources that surround them. This study: (1) investigates their use of woody vegetation; (2) studies the abundance and distribution of woody vegetation in the area; and (3) experiments with assigning use values to species and with employing these use values to identify conservation priorities. The Batemi utilize over 100 woody species, in 37 families' and 58 genera, from the environment surrounding their villages for construction, fuel, implements, services, food and medicine. Random sampling and systematic inventories in the valley showed that the most abundant species are Croton dictygamous and Acacia tortilis. Land cover in the area can be classed into three main vegetation types using a polythetic divisive program, TWINSPAN and these types are linked to three habitat types: hillside, plain and riverine. A landcover map for the area was produced from Landsat TM digital data. Based on density of woody vegetation, four categories were chosen for the final map product: thicket, woodland, wooded grassland, and grassland. To establish conservation priorities, use values are assigned based on importance of a use, number of species that can fulfill that use, and the rate of consumption. These values, when compared to abundance, provide a framework for considering conservation priorities. Based on various methods, Acacia mellifera and Haplocoelum folioosum are identified as two species that may require special attention.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Dick, Rebecca. "Wildlife Tourism and Community-Based Conservation Towards Tanzania Vision 2025." Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/41922.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This research goes beyond the traditionally studied intricacies and contentions within northern Tanzania’s community-based conservation by looking at how the state’s engagement, through wildlife tourism, with local communities in and around protected areas impacts the country’s development and conservation of its wildlife. It draws heavily on Tanzania’s Development Vision 2025 and how the wildlife tourism industry feeds into achieving its objectives. This research looks through the theoretical lens of political ecology, the theory of access, and the powers of exclusion. It applies a qualitative content analysis by coding different types of existing literature in NVivo, and includes semi-structured interviews with key respondents. The research concludes that the government’s recentralization of wildlife management is working opposite to its development ambitions as per Vision 2025, and it is doing very little to address the crisis within its ecosystems and to enhance wildlife conservation. Ultimately, it is through the government’s efforts to protect Tanzania’s ecological uniqueness that both conservation and development have faced increased challenges in its efforts to improve.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Brink, Henry. "Hunting for sustainability : lion conservation in Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania." Thesis, University of Kent, 2011. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.544075.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Perkin, Scott L. "Integrating conservation and development : an evaluation of multiple land-use in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania." Thesis, University of East Anglia, 1993. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.334762.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Kideghesho, Jafari Ramadhani. "Wildlife conservation and local land use conflicts in Western Serengeti, Tanzania." Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Biology, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-1970.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:

The pre-colonial traditional societies in Western Serengeti were physically and spiritually connected to animal species and plants in their surrounding environments. This link contributed to sustainable use and harmonious coexistence. The religious affiliation and local management structures sanctioned some destructive behaviours and designated some species and habitats as sacred. Additionally, low human population and primitive technology posed low pressure on resources. Colonial regime interrupted the coexistence through introduction of new management structures. The exclusive, prohibitive and punitive actions perpetrated by colonial regime under "fences and fines" conservation approach fomented conflicts and local resentment towards conservation policies. However, despite local resentment and conflicts, the economic and political reasons forced the post-colonial government to inherit these policies uncritically.

While the idiom "Serengeti shall not die" has been a popular motto and ambition for decades, some forces had been working against it. These forces include: inefficient state-led enforcementn (due to shrinkage of government budgets in 1970s and 1980s); human population growth; rural poverty; globalisation of markets in animal products (e.g. rhino horns and ivory) and; local resentment towards the conservation policies. The reduction of the wildlife populations and habitats as a result of these forces, ruled out the efficacy of “fences and fines” approach in conserving wildlife. This prompted a need to search for alternative approach that would end this crisis.

The community conservation (CC) initiative, which emerged as a major paradigm of conservation work in late 1980s, was the most appealing option. Through provision of tangible economic benefits, CC sought to motivate local people to align their behaviours with conservation goals. This prescription was applied to Serengeti where two CC initiatives, Serengeti Regional Conservation Project (SRCP) and Community Conservation Service (CCS) were launched. Findings from this study indicate that the benefit based approaches implemented under these initiatives are fundamentally flawed, a scenario that precludes their possibility to contribute significantly to conservation objectives.

Although attitudinal survey indicated that the benefit-based strategy increase acceptability towards conservation, this may not necessarily imply a change in behaviour. Poaching was still rampant in the villages under the projects. However, even if the strategy could lead to a change of behaviour among the beneficiaries, its impact to conservation would still be insignificant since only a small fraction of the communities benefit (i.e. 14 out of 126 villages). Furthermore, even within the project villages the minimal benefits granted are inequitably distributed and monopolised by local elites. The poorest members of the society are unable to enjoy these benefits because cash is required to access them (e.g. game meat, medical services).

Along with the benefits, the results indicated that the costs inflicted by wildlife to local people and some socio-demographic factors (education, wealth) have potential role in shaping conservation attitudes. Local communities experiencing fewer costs from wildlife conservation and those most educated were less likely to support protected areas. Those with more livestock were more negative, probably because the costs of prohibition from access to water and pasture in protected areas were more obvious to them. Conservation attitudes were more positive to Serengeti National Park than to the adjacent Game Reserves, a scenario that can be attributed to history and the age of the park. It was created some 50 years when population was low and land was still available. Furthermore, the majority of the villagers were, either too young, or were not even born when the Park came to existence. Therefore, they did not feel the pain of eviction, if there was any.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Kabiri, Ngeta Newbury Catharine. "Global environmental governance and community-based conservation in Kenya and Tanzania." Chapel Hill, N.C. : University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007. http://dc.lib.unc.edu/u?/etd,1450.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007.
Title from electronic title page (viewed Apr. 25, 2008). "... in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science." Discipline: Political Science; Department/School: Political Science.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Книги з теми "Conservation – Tanzania"

1

Assmo, Per. Soil conservation in Arusha Region, Tanzania. Nairobi: Regional Soil Conservation Unit, Swedish International Development Authority, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Tanzania. Wizara ya Maliasili na Utalii., ed. The Wildlife policy of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Network, African Conservation Tillage, CIRAD (Organization), and Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, eds. Conservation agriculture as practised in Tanzania: Three case studies. Nairobi: African Conservation Tillage Network, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Lyogello, Lilla N. A guide to Tanzania national parks. Dar es Salaam: Travel Promotion Services, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Ndagala, Daniel K. Conservation, privatisation of land and non-sedentary communities in Tanzania. Kampala, Uganda: Centre for Basic Research, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

A, Rodgers W., ed. Maasailand ecology: Pastoralist development and wildlife conservation in Ngorongoro, Tanzania. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

A, Rodgers W., ed. Maasailand ecology: Pastoralist development and wildlife conservation in Ngorongoro, Tanzania. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Kaltenborn, Bjørn Petter. People and wildlife interactions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Mwandosya, M. J. Towards a strategy for the conservation of coastal biological diversity of mainland Tanzania. [Dar es Salaam]: Centre for Energy, Environment, Science, and Technology, 1997.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Goldman, Mara. Partitioned nature, privileged knowledge: Community based conservation in the Maasai ecosystem, Tanzania. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2001.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Частини книг з теми "Conservation – Tanzania"

1

Mkonda, Msafiri Yusuph, and Xinhua He. "Conservation Agriculture in Tanzania." In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, 309–24. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48006-0_10.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Mtakwa, Peter W., Ndelilio N. Urio, Faith Milkah Wakonyo Muniale, Alpha P. Mtakwa, Rattan Lal, and Bal Ram Singh. "Conservation Agriculture in Tanzania." In Soil Degradation and Restoration in Africa, 194–226. Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019. | Series: Advances in soil science: CRC Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b22321-10.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Tibazarwa, Flora I., and Roy E. Gereau. "Shades of Green: Conservation in the Developing Environment of Tanzania." In Conservation Biology, 59–64. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118679838.ch8.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

van der Vleuten, Frank, Lex Lemmens, Otto Bos, Caspar Samplonius, Dick Toussaint, and Michel Yhdego. "Energy Conservation in the Industrial Sector in Tanzania." In The Industrial Experience of Tanzania, 262–80. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230524514_12.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Dulle, Hamadi I., Saleh S. Seif, Shedrack K. Mungure, and Jafari R. Kideghesho. "Growing Concern for the Conservation of Cavity-Nesting Birds Outside Protected Areas: Can Artificial Nest Boxes Be Effective Conservation Tools?" In Protected Areas in Northern Tanzania, 15–27. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43302-4_2.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Scoon, Roger N. "Ngorongoro Conservation Area." In Geology of National Parks of Central/Southern Kenya and Northern Tanzania, 103–14. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73785-0_10.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Nelson, Fred, Benjamin Gardner, Jim Igoe, and Andrew Williams. "Community-Based Conservation and Maasai Livelihoods in Tanzania." In Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation, 299–333. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87492-0_8.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Kisingo, Alex W., and Jafari R. Kideghesho. "Community Governance of Wildlife Resources: Implications for Conservation, Livelihood, and Improvement in Democratic Space." In Protected Areas in Northern Tanzania, 113–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43302-4_8.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Kideghesho, Jafari R., Gideon A. Mseja, Oliver C. Nyakunga, and Hamad I. Dulle. "Conservation of Large Mammals in the Face of Increasing Human Population and Urbanization in Tanzania." In Protected Areas in Northern Tanzania, 157–79. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43302-4_12.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Scoon, Roger N. "Lake Natron and the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Northern Tanzania." In The Geotraveller, 117–37. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54693-9_7.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Conservation – Tanzania"

1

Smith, Stuart W., John Bukombe, Richard Lyamuya, Philipo Jacob, Shombe N. Hassan, James D. M. Speed, and Bente J. Graae. "Contrasting wildlife and livestock impacts on plant biomass dynamics inside and outside the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania." In 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. Jyväskylä: Jyvaskyla University Open Science Centre, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.17011/conference/eccb2018/106981.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

McGlue, Michael M., Joseph S. Lucas, Kevin M. Yeager, Michael J. Soreghan, Ismael A. Kimirei, Athanasio S. Mbonde, Colin Apse, and Peter Limbu. "CONSERVATION LIMNOGEOLOGY AT LAKE TANGANYIKA: NEW RESULTS FROM THE TUUNGANE PROJECT CO-MANAGEMENT AREA AT NORTHERN MAHALE (TANZANIA)." In GSA Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - 2018. Geological Society of America, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/abs/2018am-318804.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Lwoga, N. B. "Tourism employment and local residents’ engagement in the conservation of the built heritage in Zanzibar Stone Town in Tanzania." In SUSTAINABLE TOURISM 2016. Southampton UK: WIT Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/st160041.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії