Готові списки джерел за темами / Bertrand Russell`s

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Bertrand Russell`s"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 18 травня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Зміст

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Bertrand Russell`s".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Bertrand Russell`s"

1

Pakaluk, Michael. "The Doctrine of Relations in Bertrand Russell's Principles of Mathematics." Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía 2, no. 1 (November 28, 2013): 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.21555/top.v2i1.568.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
La pregunta por la naturaleza de las relaciones es de gran importancia en los escritos tempranos de Bentrand Russell, ya que sus desacuerdos con el idealismo británico se centraban en las relaciones, y su filosofía de las matemáticas depende crucialmente de las relaciones. A pesar de esto, no hay una discusión sistemática y extendida sobre las relaciones en el Russell temprano. Después de examinar la definición de relación de Russell, el autor examina crítica y sistemáticamente los puntos de vista de Russell en los Principia Mathematica sobre los siguientes problemas: si una relación existe aparte de sus términos; el carácter intensional de las relaciones; las dificultades en las relaciones reflexivas; y si las relaciones simples pueden relacionar más de dos relatos.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Nicolaides, Angelo. "Bertrand Russell: Cognitivism, Non-Cognitivism and Ethical Critical Thinking." Phronimon 18 (August 31, 2017): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/2413-3086/1953.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Bertrand Russell converted from ethical cognitivism to ethical non-cognitivism and this was historically important, as it gave rise in part, to meta-ethics. It also clarified the central problem between cognitivism and non-cognitivism. Russell’s view was that defining “good” is the basic problem of ethics. If “good” is not amorphous, the rest of ethics will follow. He did not believe in ethical knowledge per se and asserted that reason is, and must only be, the servant of desire. A factual statement is thus true if there is an equivalent fact, but as ethical statements do not state facts, there is no issue of a corresponding fact or the statement being true or false in the sense in which factual statements are. Ethics has no statement whether true or false, but consists only of desires of a general kind and people know intuitively what is “right” or “wrong”. To Russell critical thinking is entrenched in the structure of philosophy. His epistemological conviction was that knowledge is difficult to attain, while his ethical conviction showed that people should be expected to exercise freedom of inquiry when arriving at conclusions of something being either “good” or “bad”.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Perovic, Slobodan. "Neutral monism in modern philosophy and physics." Theoria, Beograd 62, no. 2 (2019): 133–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/theo1902133p.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Philosophers have substantially considered the key ideas of Neutral Monism, a philosophical view attempting to overcome the Mind/Body problem, as it was initially developed by Ernst Mach and Bertrand Russell. Yet similar ideas are also found in some key considerations of a few prominent physicists who developed quantum mechanics, although philosophers have neglected them. We will show that Niels Bohr?s principle of complementarity (of the particle and wave aspects of microphysical phenomena) is a gradually developed and experimentally motivated account very close to Russell?s and Mach?s key ideas on Neutral Monism.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Coury, Aline Germano Fonseca, and Denise Silva Vilela. "Russell’s Paradox: a historical study about the paradox in Frege’s theories." Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática 18, no. 35 (October 22, 2020): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.47976/rbhm2018v18n351-22.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
For over twenty years, Frege tried to find the foundations of arithmetic through logic, and by doing this, he attempted to establish the truth and certainty of the knowledge. However, when he believed his work wasdone, Bertrand Russell sent him a letter pointing out a paradox, known as Russell‟s paradox. It is often considered that Russell identified the paradox in Frege‟s theories. However, as shown in this paper, Russell, Frege and also George Cantor contributedsignificantly to the identification of the paradox. In 1902, Russell encouraged Frege to reconsider a portion of his work based in a paradox built from Cantor‟s theories. Previously, in 1885, Cantor had warned Frege about taking extensions of concepts in the construction of his system. With these considerations, Frege managed to identify the precise law and definitions that allowed the generation of the paradox in his system. The objective of this paper is to present a historical reconstruction of the paradox in Frege‟s publications and discuss it considering the correspondences exchanged between him and Russell. We shall take special attention to the role played by each of these mathematicians in the identification of the paradox and its developments. We also will show how Frege anticipated the solutions and new theories that would arise when dealing with logico-mathematical paradoxes, including but not limited to Russell‟s paradox.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Kronfeld, Maya. ""Prufrock" between Acquaintance and Description: Bertrand Russell and T. S. Eliot." Philosophy and Literature 47, no. 1 (April 2023): 167–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/phl.2023.a899684.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Austin, Michael W. "God and the Reach of Reason: C. S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell." Philosophia Christi 12, no. 1 (2010): 236–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/pc201012119.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Giannini, John J. "God and the Reach of Reason: C. S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell - By Erik J. Wielenberg." Religious Studies Review 34, no. 3 (September 2008): 168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0922.2008.00294_5.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

MILKOV, Nikolay. "Thomas MORMANN, Bertrand Russell, Munich: Beck (Beck’sche Reihe, “Denker”, no. 560), 2007, 180 S. ISBN: 978-3-406-45990-0." Grazer Philosophische Studien 78, no. 1 (2009): 320–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789042026056_020.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Jungmann de Castro, Rodrigo. "Complexidades do uso atributivo de descrições definidas." Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia, no. 29 (January 1, 2023): 186–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.36517/argumentos.29.15.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
O artigo de Keith S. Donnellan “Reference and Definite Descriptions” (1966) foi escrito com a intenção de mostrar que as teorias de Bertrand Russell e Peter F. Strawson falham por igual em capturar o uso linguístico efetivo das descrições definidas. Contudo, situação se complica para Donnellan à luz do fato de que muitos usos concebíveis de descrições definidas não parecem caber em nenhuma das duas categorias. Há usos que devem ser entendidos antes como motivados pela deferência do que como atributivos, assim como há usos em que variadas falências referenciais cometidas pelos falantes têm como consequência situações em que a descrição simplesmente não dá conta da variedade de possibilidades, vale dizer, casos em que não cabe falar nem em uso referencial nem em uso atributivo. A razão para tanto parece ser a de que dificilmente há um uso atributivo “puro”. As descrições usadas nos exemplos corriqueiros contêm normalmente elementos referenciais, como nomes e indexicais. Quando estes são mal empregados, a insuficiência da distinção de Donnellan é exposta. A segunda tese aqui apresentada é a de que os usos atributivos previstos no artigo clássico de Donnellan se caracterizam por sua natureza inferencial distintiva, com a consequência de que o seu uso atributivo é em geral menos natural e plausível do que o uso referencial
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Blevins, Jeffrey. "Setting The Waste Land in Order." Twentieth-Century Literature 67, no. 4 (December 1, 2021): 431–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/0041462x-9528829.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Are T. S. Eliot’s notes on The Waste Land a scholarly resource or a literary hoax? This oft-repeated question gets to the heart of the poem, which thrives on its allusions, whether seriously or cynically. However, scholars have largely passed over the notes’ (and the poem’s) numberings, despite their complexity and superabundance—a panoply of quantitative relations running alongside the qualitative references. These numberings, with startling frequency, do not compute, which poses a philosophical dilemma greater than arithmetical errors would seem to imply. As a graduate student at Harvard, Eliot took course notes on mathematical logic and number theory that show him grappling again and again with a concept of numerical irrationality, a dilemma that, for him, seems to threaten the coherence of the world itself, the failures of enumeration auguring broader pandemonium. Under the tutelage of Bertrand Russell, Eliot turns to logic in an attempt to discern a coherent system for numbers (and therefore life), but he grows disenchanted with how logic’s paradoxes of self-reference undermines that very possibility. In turn, these paradoxes inform The Waste Land as an irrational subtext, as small miscalculations in the poem and the notes herald impending physical disasters, psychological hazards, and metaphysical perils. In the end, how we count its numbers turns out to have important implications for how we account for The Waste Land’s puzzling and even deadly subjects.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Bertrand Russell`s"

1

Borchate, Denise. "O CONHECIMENTO POR ACQUAINTANCE EM BERTRAND RUSSELL." Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 2015. http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9152.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
The acquaintance is the relation between the mind and certain objects called russell´s objects. These objects are restricted to individuals who can think directly. Appearances, such as colors, are examples of russell´s objects. The acquaintance is a primitive epistemic relation. The individual has the ability to discriminate those objects, distinguishing them from others in the traditional interpretation of acquaintance. The objects are known by acquaintance in the sense that the mind can identify them perfectly. In this case, the subject can not be wrong about the interpretation and the knowledge of what is thinking about it. A individual can, however, be in a relation with one and the same individual at different times, not realizing that it is the same. The cases of the continuous phenomena show that, explaining the difficulty in demonstrating the reference equality through changes in the character of the experience.
A acquaintance consiste na relação entre a mente e certos objetos chamados de objetos russellianos. Estes objetos restringem-se a indivíduos que podemos pensar diretamente. As aparências, tais como as cores, são exemplos de objetos russellianos. A acquaintance é uma relação epistêmica primitiva. O sujeito possui a capacidade de discriminar aqueles objetos, distinguindo-os de outros na interpretação tradicional de acquaintance. Os objetos são conhecidos por acquaintance no sentido que a mente pode identificá-los perfeitamente. Neste caso, o sujeito não pode estar errado no conhecimento daquilo que está pensando naquela interpretação. Um sujeito pode, no entanto, estar em uma relação com um e o mesmo indivíduo, em diferentes ocasiões, sem perceber que é o mesmo. Os casos dos fenômenos contínuos mostram isso, explicitando a dificuldade em demonstrar a igualdade de referência através das mudanças no caráter da experiência.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Sinha, Bonani. "A Critical survey on Bertrand Russell`s philosophy of language." Thesis, University of North Bengal, 2005. http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/61.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Книги з теми "Bertrand Russell`s"

1

The Wisdom of Bertrand Russell (Wisdom S.). Manjul Publishing House Pvt Ltd, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Wielenberg, Erik J. God and the Reach of Reason: C. S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Wielenberg, Erik J. God and the Reach of Reason: C. S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Wielenberg, Erik J. God and the Reach of Reason: C. S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Wielenberg, Erik J. God and the Reach of Reason: C. S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell. Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Wielenberg, Erik J. God and the Reach of Reason: C. S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

God and the Reach of Reason: C.S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Wielenberg, Erik J. God and the Reach of Reason: C.S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Briggs, Andrew, Hans Halvorson, and Andrew Steane. On the way. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808282.003.0009.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
In this the second of the three autobiographical chapters, Andrew Steane (A.S.) recounts some of his experiences. He describes a life at a crossing-point of conservative and liberal forms of Christian witness, and conscious of both modern-day atheist and theist values and points of view. This has been difficult but, hopefully, creative. A.S. describes his reading of Bertrand Russell as a young man, and of later being waylaid by Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion. He gives brief reactions and asks what the reaction to such books shows us about contemporary culture. More penetrating authors have been Rowan Williams, R. S. Thomas, Brian McLaren, and N. T. Wright. A.S. describes aspects of Christian community life that have proved positive and significant for him.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Saunders, Max. Imagined Futures. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829454.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This study provides the first substantial history and analysis of the To-Day and To-Morrow series of 110 books, published by Kegan Paul Trench and Trübner (and E. P. Dutton in the USA) from 1923 to 1931, in which writers chose a topic, described its present, and predicted its future. Contributors included J. B. S. Haldane, Bertrand Russell, Vernon Lee, Robert Graves, Vera Brittain, Sylvia Pankhurst, Hugh McDiarmid, James Jeans, J. D. Bernal, Winifred Holtby, André Maurois, and many others. The study combines a comprehensive account of its interest, history, and range with a discussion of its key concerns, tropes, and influence. The argument focuses on science and technology, not only as the subject of many of the volumes, but also as method—especially through the paradigm of the human sciences—applied to other disciplines; and as a source of metaphors for representing other domains. It also includes chapters on war, technology, cultural studies, and literature and the arts. This book has three main aims. First, to reinstate the series as a vital contribution to the writing of modernity. Second, to reappraise modernism’s relation to the future, establishing a body of progressive writing which moves beyond the discourses of post-Darwinian degeneration and post-war disenchantment, projecting human futures rather than mythic or classical pasts. Third, to show how, as a co-ordinated body of futurological writing, the series is also revealing about the nature and practices of modern futurology.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Частини книг з теми "Bertrand Russell`s"

1

Linsky, Bernard. "Russell s Logical Form, LF, and Truth-Conditions." In Logical form and Language, 391–408. Oxford University PressOxford, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199244607.003.0013.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract Bertrand Russell’s theory of definite descriptions is generally credited as the source of the idea that the logical form of a sentence will be very different from its grammatical or syntactic form. Russell’s view was that just as ‘I met a man’ and ‘No one met Jones’ are only superficially atomic relational statements of the form aRb and must be represented very differently when symbolized in a formal language, so sentences with definite descriptions such as ‘The present king of France is bald’ must also be given symbolizations very different from their superficial grammatical form as simple subject predicate sentences.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

"The Rhetorical Similarities of C. S. Lewis and Bertrand Russell." In Plain to the Inward Eye. Abilene Christian University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv310vncq.8.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Mawson, T. J. "The Cosmological Argument." In Belief in God, 153–62. Oxford University PressOxford, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199276318.003.0010.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract I’m going to start with a presentation of the Cosmological Argument given by Frederick Copleston in a radio debate with Bertrand Russell.1 Here ’s the argument as Copleston puts it: First of all, I should say, we know that there are at least some beings in the world which do not contain in themselves the reason for their existence. For example, I depend on my parents, and now on the air, and on food and so on.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Pinkard, Terry. "Was Pragmatism the Successor to Idealism?" In New Pragmatists, 142–68. Oxford University PressOxford, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199279975.003.0008.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract Although the story of Hegel’s relation to the development of analytical philosophy is well known, the story of the relation between pragmatism and Hegelian idealism is a more ambiguous tale. Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore staked out their new program in analytical philosophy in firm opposition to what they (mistakenly) thought of as ‘Hegelianism’. However, the pragmatists had different reactions. Like Russell, John Dewey began his philosophical career as a Hegelian, but William James apparently despised what he at least understood to be Hegelianism, and C. S. Peirce both reacted against and at the same time developed the themes found in both James and the idealists. Whatever their differences over the value of idealism, however, the pragmatists all agreed that they had gone beyond Hegelian (and Kantian) idealism, having transformed it into something more defensible or having defeated it by virtue of the pragmatist approach to issues of the meaning of experience, truth, and the status of natural science in the theory of knowledge.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Alexander, Edward. "Prophets and Rationalists: A Combustible Combination—Thomas Carlyle and J. S. Mill;D. H. Lawrence, and Bertrand Russell." In Lionel Trilling & Irving Howe, 69–86. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203787106-2.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

"17 Notes Preparatory to a Criticism of Bertrand Russell’s Principles of Mathematics." In Charles S. Peirce. Selected Writings on Semiotics, 1894–1912, 305–10. De Gruyter Mouton, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110607390-018.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Також вас можуть зацікавити розширені добірки на тему "Bertrand Russell`s" для конкретних типів джерел:
Статті в журналах
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії