Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Avoidance actions in insolvency proceedings"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Avoidance actions in insolvency proceedings".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Avoidance actions in insolvency proceedings"
Thao Phan, Phuong. "Contractual performance by a third party governed by lex contractus and the effectiveness of avoidance action in insolvency proceedings." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 14, no. 1 (March 7, 2022): 853–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2022.6721.
Повний текст джерелаNoneva-Zlatkova, Yordanka. "European Court of Justice Jurisprudence in the Field of Avoidance Actions with International Elements for Filling the Insolvency Estate." International conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION 26, no. 2 (June 1, 2020): 205–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2020-0077.
Повний текст джерелаKeay, Andrew. "THE HARMONIZATION OF THE AVOIDANCE RULES IN EUROPEAN UNION INSOLVENCIES." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 66, no. 1 (November 16, 2016): 79–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589316000518.
Повний текст джерелаKeay, Andrew. "Harmonisation of avoidance rules in European Union insolvencies: the critical elements in formulating a scheme." Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 69, no. 2 (May 11, 2018): 85–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v69i2.82.
Повний текст джерелаKeay, Andrew. "Harmonisation of avoidance rules in European Union insolvencies: the critical elements in formulating a scheme." Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 69, no. 2 (May 11, 2018): 85–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v69i2.83.
Повний текст джерелаLennarts, Loes. "EU Corporate Insolvency Law in the Wake of the ECJ’s Deko Marty Judgment." European Company Law 7, Issue 3 (June 1, 2010): 106–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eucl2010021.
Повний текст джерелаVâlcu, Elise Nicoleta, and Lavinia Olah. "PREVENTIVE PROCEEDINGS IN THE VISION OF THE CODE ON PREVENTINVE PROCEEDINGS OF INSOLVENCY AND OF INSOLVENCY - A FIRST STEP FOR THE HARMONIZATION OF THE EU MEMBER STATE'S LEGISLATIONS IN THIS AREA." Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences 8, no. 1 (February 4, 2014): 184–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v8i1.932.
Повний текст джерелаCamp, Charles, and Theresa Bowman. "Rubin v. Eurofinance SA (U.K. Sup. Ct.)." International Legal Materials 52, no. 2 (April 2013): 623–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.52.2.0623.
Повний текст джерелаFrigessi di Rattalma, Marco. "Avoidance Actions under Article 13 EC Insolvency Regulation: An Italian View." European Company Law 6, Issue 1 (February 1, 2009): 27–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eucl2009005.
Повний текст джерелаKasak, Anto. "Is Full Preference for a Secured Claim in Insolvency Proceedings Justified?" Juridica International 28 (November 13, 2019): 112–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/ji.2019.28.13.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Avoidance actions in insolvency proceedings"
Lunetti, Chiara. "Actions deriving directly from insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them under regulation EU 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings." Thesis, Paris 1, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020PA01D011.
Повний текст джерелаThe thesis, entitled "Actions deriving directly from insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them under regulation EU 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings", focuses on the criteria for determining the courts having jurisdiction for disputes arising in the context of cross-border Insolvency proceedings. According to its Article l(l)(b), insolvency proceedings are excluded from the scope of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 ('Brussels Regulation') and should be covered by Regulation (EU) No 848/2015 ('EIR). For this reason, in principle, the interpretation of the two regulations should, as far as possible, fill in the regulatory gaps between the two instruments. The text of the new Article 6 EIR now provides that any action with cross-border elements that prove to be 'directly deriving from Insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them' must be attracted to the jurisdiction of the Member State opening the insolvency procedure under Article 3 EIR. Nevertheless, this principle (referred to as the 'reduced' vis attractiva concursus), despite some clarifications provided by the European Court of Justice, does not resolve the issue, and the interpretation of the scope of application of the Insolvency Regulation and the Brussels Regulation's remains questionable, as there are still many grey zones in the interpretation of this rule. The aim of the thesis is to analyse what kind of actions should be regarded as 'directly deriving from' and 'closely linked with' insolvency proceedings, and to analyse those cases where it is controversial whether the action should fall within the scope of the EIR rather than the Brussels Regulation
LUNETTI, CHIARA TERESA MARIA. "ACTIONS DERIVING DIRECTLY FROM INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS AND CLOSELY LINKED WITH THEM UNDER REGULATION EU 848/2015 ON INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/710018.
Повний текст джерелаHistorically, the topic of individual actions directly deriving from and closely linked with insolvency proceedings (hereinafter referred to as “Annex Actions”) has been addressed in the European scenario with reference to the scope ratione materiae of the Brussels Convention dated 1968 on the jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the “Brussels Convention”). In the absence (at that time) of Community rules on cross-border insolvencies, in the Gourdain judgment the ECJ interpreted the notion of Annex Actions under the prism of the exception relating to “bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings”, set forth by Article 1(2)(2) Brussels Convention. It was on that occasion that the Court held that actions which are related to insolvency proceedings are excluded from the scope of the Brussels Convention (now the Brussels 1a Regulation), with the proviso that they derive directly from insolvency proceedings and are closely linked with them (thus coining what has been called, over the years, the “Gourdain Formula”). The interpretative uncertainties arising from such an ambiguous wording - at the time referring only to the scope of application of the Brussels Convention - were not removed (and possibly were even exacerbated) by the introduction of the European regime on insolvency proceedings. Indeed, the Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 (the “Insolvency Regulation”), on the one hand, revealed a serious regulatory gap, since it did not provide for a rule on the jurisdiction of Annex Actions and, on the other hand, even where it mentioned them (for purposes other than jurisdiction), it laconically restated the Gourdain Formula, with no further clarifications. The nebulous legislative framework described above has been partly clarified by Regulation (EU) 2015/848 (the “Recast Regulation”), which has remedied the aforementioned omission, expressly providing for the (halved) European vis attractiva concursus. According to that principle, the courts of the Member State in the territory of which insolvency proceedings are opened, are vested with the jurisdiction to hear and determine Annex Actions. The impact of the reform over the “dynamic” profile of the vis attractiva concursus must be positively assessed since it has dispelled many of the doubts concerning the allocation of jurisdiction on Annex Actions. Yet, the problem of the autonomous definition of Annex Actions remains partially unsolved, because also under the Recast Regulation, the contours of that concept continue to be defined by the vague Gourdain Formula. Only partial indications can be drawn from Recital 35 Recast Regulation and, above all, from the extensive case-law of the ECJ. The latter, however, allows only to some extent to draw a systematic notion of Annex Actions, as it substantially reveals a wavering orientation, which does not permit to trace (yet) a general criterion, certain and shared on this point. It is suggested that, for the purposes of the European legislation, Annex Actions are those actions underpinning a right or obligation which stems from the opening of insolvency proceedings, whose DNA, we might say, is ontologically linked to insolvency proceedings. They would count a very small number of actions such as (predictably) avoidance actions, liability actions against the trustee and other bodies of the procedure, and actions arising from the termination of contracts exercised by the trustee by virtue of the express powers conferred upon him by insolvency law. On the contrary, all other actions in respect of which the procedure is a neutral (legal) event should not be characterised as Annex Actions (e.g. actions that have only an occasional link with insolvency proceedings and those that existed in the legal sphere of the insolvent debtor prior to the opening of the procedure). However, considerable doubts remain with respect to the characterisation of some actions, which can be placed in an uncertain twilight-zone at the crossline between civil, commercial law and bankruptcy law. Although the legal foundation of those action exists even before insolvency proceedings, they prove to be affected by the opening of the procedure to such an extent that they may be considered as different actions. In the wake of these preliminary observations, the thesis aims to specifically analyse the topic of Annex Actions under the European regime of cross-border insolvencies. Not only it investigates the procedural aspects of the issue (in particular, the jurisdiction), but it also assesses whether it is possible to draw an autonomous notion of Annex Action and elaborate a catalogue of actions, which, despite the differences inherent in each national system, reveal a jus commune europaeum that allows to trace them back under the umbrella of the Recast Regulation.
La thèse intitulé « les actions qui découlent directement de la procédure d’insolvabilité et qui y sont étroitement liées dans le cadre du Règlement UE 2015/848 sur les procédures d'insolvabilité » se concentre sur les critères de détermination des juridictions compétentes en matière de litiges découlant de la procédure d’insolvabilité dans le contexte de procédures transfrontalières. Selon son Article 1(1)(b), les procédures d’insolvabilité sont exclues du Règlement (UE) n° 1215/2012 concernant la compétence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l’exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale (« Règlement Bruxelles ») et devraient relever du champ d’application du Règlement (UE) n° 848/2015 relatif aux procédures d’insolvabilité (« Règlement Refondu »). Pour cette raison, en principe, l’interprétation de deux susmentionnés Règlements devrait, autant que possible, combler les lacunes entre les deux instruments. Le texte du nouvel article 6 du Règlement Refondu prévoit désormais que les juridictions compétentes en vertu de son article 3 soient compétentes également pour toutes les actions qui découlent directement de la procédure d’insolvabilité et y sont étroitement liées. Toutefois, ce principe (appelé la vis attractiva concursus européenne), malgré quelques clarifications ont été fournies par la Cour de Justice, ne résoudre pas la question et l’interprétation du champ d’application du Règlement Refondu par rapport au Règlement Bruxelles est encore douteuse, car il y a encore beaucoup de zones grises dans l’interprétation de cette règle. L'objectif de la thèse est d'analyser quel type d'actions doit être considéré comme « découlant directement » et « étroitement lié » aux procédures d'insolvabilité, et d'analyser les cas où il est controversé de savoir si l'action doit entrer dans le champ d'application du Règlement Refondu plutôt que dans celui du Règlement Bruxelles.
Silvestri, Kevin. "La simulazione negoziale nel processo civile." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Trento, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/11572/345843.
Повний текст джерелаLa tesi mira a ricostruire la disciplina processuale della simulazione negoziale, ossia le regole concernenti l'attività compiuta nel processo dalle parti e dal giudice, ogniqualvolta la simulazione di un negozio giuridico sia oggetto di allegazione, prova e decisione (nella forma della mera cognizione o dell'accertamento). Si segue, a tal fine, un metodo diverso da quello comunemente impiegato dalla giurisprudenza e dalla dottrina, le quali hanno perlopiù dedotto il contenuto di tali regole a partire dalla soluzione di volta in volta prescelta al problema della qualificazione del contratto simulato. La giurisprudenza, muovendo dalla tesi della nullità del contratto simulato, conclude per la diretta applicabilità delle norme del codice civile dedicate all'azione e all'eccezione di nullità. Parte della dottrina, discostandosi da quella premessa, propone soluzioni applicative di segno opposto. Al contrario, nel presente lavoro, la centralità solitamente assegnata al contratto simulato, è occupata dalla simulazione, ossia dalla fattispecie degli effetti che gli artt. 1414 e seguenti designano quali “effetti della simulazione”. Detta fattispecie è infatti quanto forma oggetto dell'attività dei soggetti del processo (l'allegazione, la prova, la cognizione e l'accertamento). La ricostruzione della disciplina processuale della simulazione muove pertanto dalla collocazione della fattispecie simulatoria entro le categorie che informano il contenuto di quella disciplina, e cioè la qualificazione della simulazione come tema di prova, come questione di merito oggetto di mera cognizione, nonché, infine, come oggetto del processo e dell'accertamento munito di autorità di cosa giudicata. La prima parte della tesi (capitoli da 1 a 4) si occupa esattamente di tale inquadramento, prendendo le mosse dalla definizione della fattispecie simulatoria e dalla discussione critica delle due opposte concezioni del fenomeno simulatorio che emergono dalla cospicua letteratura sul tema: una concezione “negativa”, che vede nella simulazione una forma qualificata di difetto della fattispecie negoziale, e una concezione “positiva”, che ravvisa la fattispecie simulatoria in un negozio distinto da quello simulato (il c.d. accordo simulatorio). Enunciate le ragioni a sostegno di quest'ultima concezione, si prende in esame la questione della struttura del contratto dissimulato e del ruolo dell'accordo simulatorio sulla formazione e l'efficacia del medesimo. L'inquadramento della simulazione nelle categorie fondamentali del processo prosegue mediante l'osservazione degli effetti giuridici che l'attività simulatoria produce riguardo ai terzi, e l'inquadramento processuale delle categorie sostanziali richiamate negli artt. 1415 e 1416 c.c. (segnatamente, l'inopponibilità). Infine, si definisce l'oggetto dell'azione di simulazione, mettendo di fronte la prevalente tesi che detto oggetto fa coincidere con il rapporto fondamentale contrattuale, e quella minoritaria che addita le azioni di simulazione e nullità quali esempi di processi di accertamento di situazioni giuridiche preliminari. Si sottopone quindi a critica la tesi del rapporto fondamentale. La seconda parte (capitoli 5 e 6) è dedicata alla discussione di profili scelti di dinamica processuale, segnatamente: l'eccezione di simulazione assoluta, e il problema della sua rilevabilità d'ufficio nei processi diretti all'esecuzione del contratto simulato, nonché in quelli che mirano, al contrario, alla dichiarazione della nullità, ovvero all'annullamento, alla rescissione o alla risoluzione dello stesso contratto; le molteplici sfaccettature che presenta la cognizione della simulazione assoluta nel corso (o a lato) dell'espropriazione forzata intrapresa contro il titolare apparente; la forma del contratto dissimulato e l'ampiezza dei poteri istruttori dei simulanti che intendano dar prova della simulazione relativa, e per suo tramite del contratto dissimulato, particolarmente nel caso in cui la simulazione relativa del prezzo venga addotta per contrastare l'azione revocatoria promossa dal curatore fallimentare contro una compravendita immobiliare “a prezzo vile”; la legittimazione ad agire nell'azione di simulazione; i limiti oggettivi del giudicato di accertamento della simulazione.
Mudroch, Luboš. "Neúčinnost právních úkonů dlužníka v insolvenčním řízení. Komparace české a britské právní úpravy." Master's thesis, 2020. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-434666.
Повний текст джерелаFernandes, Alaíde Fidalgo. "Os efeitos processuais da declaração de insolvência sobre as acções laborais pendentes, em especial, as ações de impugnação de despedimento ilícito." Master's thesis, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/90432.
Повний текст джерелаOs efeitos processuais da declaração da insolvência interferem drasticamente com a vida das ações em curso sendo que, muitas vezes, o destino dessas ações não está previsto na lei. As ações de impugnação de um despedimento ilícito, pendentes aquando da declaração de insolvência da entidade empregadora são um dos casos.A discordância a nível doutrinal e jurisprudencial é abundante, o que consequentemente levou o Supremo Tribunal de Justiça a pronunciar-se sobre a questão, fixando que a instância onde tais ações correm se extingue por inutilidade superveniente da lide com o trânsito em julgado da declaração de insolvência.O presente trabalho tem como objetivo analisar a questão em toda a sua dimensão, começando pelo Direito do Trabalho onde iremos explanar as características da ação de impugnação do despedimento ilícito e os direitos que essa ilicitude acarreta para o trabalhador. De seguida analisaremos o Direito Processual Civil para demonstrar que apesar da declaração de insolvência do empregador, ainda permanecem interesses juridicamente relevantes que justifiquem a continuação da ação a instância laboral. Por último, o Direito da Insolvência analisando a possibilidade de permanência da ação laboral, em questão, em paralelo com o processo de insolvência.Defende-se, assim, a possibilidade de o trabalhador/credor reclamar os créditos no processo de insolvência com a permanência da instância da ação laboral, não se verificando com esta solução qualquer prejudicialidade para o princípio da igualdade, apenas se tratando de forma diferente o que seja diferente. Constatamos que esta será a melhor forma de garantir a primazia do direito de ação e do princípio da tutela jurisdicional efetiva.Neste sentido, apelamos à necessidade de regulamentar devidamente esta questão de modo a serem ultrapassadas as divergências decisórias geradoras de insegurança para os destinatários das mesmas.
The procedural effects of the insolvency declaration drastically interfere with the life of the ongoing actions, and often the fate of these actions is not foreseen by law. The actions of impugement of an unlawful dismissal pending in the declaration of insolvency employer are one of the cases.The disagreement at the doctrinal and jurisprudential level is abundant, which consequently led the Supreme Court of Justice to set a ruling on the issue, fixing that the instances where such actions take place are extinguishable by superfluity of the dispute with the final decision of the declaration of insolvency. The present work aims to analyze the question in all its dimension, beginning with the labor law, where we will explain the characteristics of the action of impugement of illicit dismissal and the rights that this illegality entails to the worker. We will then analyze the civil procedural law to demonstrate that despite the employer's declaration of insolvency, there still remains relevant juridical interests that justify the continuation of the action in the labor court. Lastly, the insolvency law analyses the possibility of permanence of employment in parallel with the insolvency proceedings.It is therefore argued that the worker should claim his credits in the insolvency proceedings with the permanence of the labor action, without beig found, with this solution, any prejudice to the creditor’s principle of equality, only treating differently what is different. We find that this solution will be the best way to guarantee the primacy of the right of action and the principle of effective judicial protection.In this regard, we appeal to the need to dutifully regulate this issue in order to overcome the decision-making disagreements that generate insecurity for the recipients of the same.
Книги з теми "Avoidance actions in insolvency proceedings"
Parry, Rebecca, James Ayliffe, and Sharif Shivji. Transaction Avoidance in Insolvencies. Edited by Hamish Anderson and William Trower. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793403.001.0001.
Повний текст джерелаAnderson, Hamish. The Framework of Corporate Insolvency Law. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805311.001.0001.
Повний текст джерелаStefan, Tiefenthaler. 4 Austria. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198808589.003.0004.
Повний текст джерелаRoel, Fransis. 3 National Report for Belgium. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198727293.003.0003.
Повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Avoidance actions in insolvency proceedings"
Oprea, Elena-Alina. "The Law Applicable to Transaction Avoidance in Cross-Border Insolvency Proceedings." In Recasting the Insolvency Regulation, 75–107. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-363-4_4.
Повний текст джерела"Avoidance Transactions in Out-of-Court Workouts, and Pre-Insolvency Procedures, and Possible Safe Harbours." In Rescue of Business in Europe, edited by Bob Wessels and Stephan Madaus. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826521.003.0010.
Повний текст джерела"Detrimental acts." In Commentary on the European Insolvency Regulation, edited by Reinhard Bork and Kristin van Zwieten, 321–31. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852117.003.0017.
Повний текст джерелаParry, Rebecca. "Destination of Proceeds (Corporate Insolvency)." In Transaction Avoidance in Insolvencies. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793403.003.0032.
Повний текст джерелаAnderson, Hamish. "Transaction Avoidance." In The Framework of Corporate Insolvency Law. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805311.003.0015.
Повний текст джерелаParry, Rebecca, and Sharif Shivji. "Preferences (Insolvency Act 1986, Sections 239 and 340)." In Transaction Avoidance in Insolvencies. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793403.003.0007.
Повний текст джерела"Article 6. Jurisdiction for actions deriving directly from insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them." In European Insolvency Regulation, edited by Moritz Brinkmann, 74–82. Verlag C.H.BECK oHG, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.17104/9783406759031-74.
Повний текст джерелаParry, Rebecca. "Cross-Border Transaction Avoidance." In Transaction Avoidance in Insolvencies. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793403.003.0026.
Повний текст джерелаGoode, Roy. "The Avoidance of Transactions in Insolvency Proceedings and Restitutionary Defences." In Mapping the Law, 299–320. Oxford University Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206551.003.0017.
Повний текст джерела"Jurisdiction for actions which derive directly from the insolvency proceedings and are closely linked with them." In Commentary on the European Insolvency Regulation, edited by Reinhard Bork and Kristin van Zwieten, 221–43. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852117.003.0007.
Повний текст джерелаТези доповідей конференцій з теми "Avoidance actions in insolvency proceedings"
Bodul, Dejan. "POGLED NA NOVO HRVATSKO STEČAJNO ZAKONODAVSTVO IZ 2022: pokušaj usklađivanja tržišne dimenzije i zaštite prezaduženih potrošača." In XVIII Majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xviiimajsko.981b.
Повний текст джерела