Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Arbitrato. Processo / Статті в журналах

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Arbitrato. Processo.

Статті в журналах з теми "Arbitrato. Processo"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 11 березня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Arbitrato. Processo".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Riberti, Anna. "II Contratto di Arbitrato." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 5, Issue 18 (May 1, 2008): 123–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2008033.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

RIASSUNTO: L'articolo è volto ad esaminare lo status degli arbitri e la natura giuridica del rapporto che, nel processo arbitrale, si instaura tra i compromettenti e il l'organo giudicante: la questione è stata oggetto di accesi dibattiti, ma nessun ordinamento ha finora espressamente adottato una soluzione. Nondimeno, la determinazione della vera natura di tale vincolo consente un regolare svolgimento del procedimento, evitando il sorgere di situazioni anomale. Esso si inserisce nell'ambito di un procedimento che presenta natura ibrida, con fonte contrattuale ma oggetto giudiziale. Le riforme che dal 1983 si sono susseguite fino al D. Lgs. 4/2006 mettono in luce il mutato atteggiamento del legislatore, che, da istituto di carattere privatistico, ha reso l'arbitrato uno strumento modellato sul giudizio ordinario, ma a questo autonomo ed alternativo. Invero, da un'attenta analisi delle norme che regolano il rapporto tra le parti e gli arbitri, emerge come la fattispecie rilevi a figura contrattuale autonoma - precisamente "contratto di arbitrato" - escludendo la riconducibilità della stessa sia a negozi tipici (quali il mandato, la prestazione d'opera, la transazione o un negotium mixtum tra questi), sia ad un rapporto di matrice pubblicistica. Uno sguardo all'esperienza di altri ordinamenti conferma il cambiamento nella "filosofia" dell'istituto, che non è più ancillare rispetto alla giustizia ordinaria, ma configura l'arbitro quale giudice dei privati nel campo dei diritti disponibili. Peculiare è, infine, l'arbitrato c.d. amministrato, dove la presenza di una Corte arbitrale volta a controllare il procedimento, determina il sorgere di rapporti giuridici trilaterali tra le parti, l'istituzione arbitrale e l'arbitro da questa designato.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Jensen, J. Ole. "Due process paranoia and the procedural judgment rule: a safe harbor for procedural management decisions by international arbitrators." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 14, Issue 54 (August 1, 2017): 73–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2017022.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Faced with a party’s procedural request, international arbitrators sometimes need to decide a delicate question: is this a legitimate exercise of the party’s procedural rights, or an unreasonable move, leading to an unnecessary delay of the proceedings? When answering this question, the fear that the eventual award might be challenged due to a violation of the parties’ due process rights lingers as the proverbial Sword of Damocles. Often, such “due process paranoia” will lead the arbitrator to grant unreasonable procedural requests, thus prolonging the proceedings unnecessarily. This neither benefits the parties nor the attractiveness of international arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism. The present contribution attempts to ameliorate this situation. It reviews the state courts’ approach to dealing with arbitrators’ exercise of their procedural management discretion to reveal that “due process paranoia” is unfounded. Rather, the review brings to light what may be termed the “Procedural Judgment Rule”, a safe harbor for arbitrators’ exercise of their procedural discretion. The contribution encourages international arbitrators to embrace this discretion by conducting proactive proceedings. It offers methods to efficiently deal with delicate procedural management situations in order to avoid “due process paranoia” altogether.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Neto, João Luiz Lessa. "A competência-competência no novo Código de Processo Civil: decisão arbitral como pressuposto processual negativo." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 12, Issue 48 (December 1, 2015): 22–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2015063.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

ABSTRACT: This paper focuses at the competence-competence rule in Brazil, especially the consequences of the New Civil Procedure Code in the matter (Federal Law 13.105 of 16 March 2015). The New CPC adopts a multi-door Court-House Model and creates a system of Court-annexed ADR. As for arbitration, the New CPC chose not to make any substantial change in the Brazilian Arbitration Act. However, the article 485, VII, of the New CPC is substantially different from its predecessor, article 267, VII, of the CPC of 1973. The new article clarifies that the arbitrator has a temporal precedence to decide about his own jurisdiction and if the arbitrator decide that he has jurisdiction to hear a given case the judge should stay any court proceedings about the same subject. The judge can only decide, in a prima facie basis, about the arbitrator’s jurisdiction if the arbitrator has not done so yet. This change is important as it settles the current debate about the text of the article 8 of the Arbitration Act.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Carreteiro, Mateus Aimoré. "Burden and standard of proof in international arbitration: proposed guidelines for promoting predictability." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 13, Issue 49 (April 1, 2016): 82–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2016004.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

RESUMO: Ônus e medida da prova são dois importantes assuntos que não têm recebido a devida atenção no contexto de arbitragens internacionais. Este artigo sustenta que ônus e medida da prova são institutos probatórios – cada qual com sua própria função – disponíveis aos julgadores no processo de decisão. Árbitros não estão, em princípio, vinculados a aplicar regras probatórias da mesma forma aplicada pelas cortes nacionais. No entanto, quando ônus e medida da prova são regulados de forma específica pelas partes ou pela lei aplicável, os árbitros devem respeitar tais normais. Ao final, este artigo fornece algumas diretrizes sobre o tratamento dos assuntos e sugere como os regulamentos arbitrais podem desenvolvê-los. ABSTRACT: Burden and standard of proof are two important issues that have not received enough attention in the context of international arbitration. This paper argues that burden and standard of proof are evidentiary mechanisms – each one with its own function – available to adjudicators in the decision-making process. Arbitrators are not in principle bound to apply these evidentiary rules as applied by national courts. But when burden and standard of proof are clearly regulated in a specific way by the parties or by the applicable law, arbitrators must observe such specific rules. Eventually this paper provides some guidelines to address these issues and to furnish future developments of arbitration rules.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Carter, Donald D. "The Duty to Accomodate: Its Growing Impact on the Grievance Arbitration Process." Articles 52, no. 1 (April 12, 2005): 185–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/051157ar.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Grievance arbitrators now have a responsibility to interpret and apply human rights legislation in the course of resolving collective agreement disputes. This responsibility, however, raises the question of whether grievance arbitration is the most suitable forum for the application of human rights laws. In Canada, grievance arbitration has been a hybrid process, containing both public and private components. Recent arbitral jurisprudence, however, suggests that arbitrators see themselves as primarily private adjudicators. These cases indicate that arbitrators have been reluctant to give full scope to the duty to accommodate in order to avoid disturbing the terms of the collective agreement. This reluctance of the arbitrators to play a full role as human rights adjudicators means that, although arbitration is now a necessary forum for the resolution of human rights disputes, it is not necessarily the most ideal forum for the enforcement of Canadian human rights laws.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Mirzaraimov, Bakhodir. "Effective Measures Of Preventing Due Process Paranoia In International Arbitration." American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology 02, no. 11 (November 28, 2020): 72–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/volume02issue11-13.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In the contemporary world, people increasingly prefer alternative dispute resolution options to litigation in order to get more flexible process with quicker and cheaper results. One of the most recognizable forms of alternative dispute resolution is arbitration. The main benefits of arbitration are its neutrality of place, finality of process, flexibility, confidentiality, party autonomy, cost and time effectiveness, and finally its universally recognised process. However, lately arbitration has been criticizing for repeatedly extensions of deadlines by tribunals, recognitions of late evidences, acceptance of multiple amendments to a party’s written submissions and reschedule hearings by agreeing to last minute requests. This phenomenon is also known as due process paranoia. This article will emphasize the main reasons for due process from both respondents and arbitrators’ point of view. Moreover, the methods of improving the efficiency of arbitral proceedings and reducing cost and delay will be critically reviewed.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Witkin, Nathan. "Consensus Arbitration: A Negotiation-Based Decision-Making Process for Arbitrators." Negotiation Journal 26, no. 3 (July 1, 2010): 309–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2010.00275.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Riesenberg, David P., Carolyn B. Lamm, and Eckhard R. Hellbeck. "An Arbitrators Duties: Due Process and Trust in Investor-State Arbitration." BCDR International Arbitration Review 2, Issue 2 (December 1, 2015): 357–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2015020.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Most of the improvements being discussed for investor-State dispute settlement involve proposals of ever more lengthy and intricate rules. This article proposes a different, perhaps complementary approach by looking at the ability and duty of arbitrators to preserve trust in the investor-State arbitration system. Indeed, arbitrators are uniquely positioned to act as the principal guardians of the system by conducting each proceeding in accordance with fundamental rules of due process and procedural fairness based on the agreed procedures and the rule of law. In so doing, arbitrators alone have the inherent authority and the opportunity, but also the duty to the parties appearing before them, to build and preserve trust from the ground up.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Cremasco, Suzana Santi. "O artigo 485, VII, do Novo Código de Processo Civil e o reconhecimento de competência pelo árbitro como pressuposto processual negativo no processo judicial." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 14, Issue 53 (April 1, 2017): 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2017001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

RESUMO: O novo Código de Processo Civil – Lei nº 13.105/2015 –, embora tenha respeitado a sistemática da arbitragem trazida pela Lei nº 9.307/1996, contemplou alguns avanços importantes na interface entre a arbitragem e o processo judicial. Uma das maiores inovações, sem dúvida, é o reconhecimento da convenção de arbitragem pelo árbitro como causa de extinção do processo sem resolução de mérito (art. 485, VII, parte final), em claro prestígio ao princípio da competência-competência tão consolidado no universo arbitral. Ao fazê-lo, o legislador de 2015 cria uma nova modalidade de pressuposto processual negativo no processo judicial. Analisar esse novo pressuposto, os seus contornos e os seus limites na nova codificação brasileira é o objeto e o desafio deste trabalho. ABSTRACT: The new Civil Procedure Code – Law 13.105/2015 – respected the arbitration system brought by Law 9.307/1996 as well as contemplated some important advances in the interface between the arbitration and the judicial process. One of the greatest innovations, undoubtedly, is the recognition of the arbitration agreement by the arbitrator as a cause of dismissal without prejudice (article 485, VII, final part), in clear prestige to the competence-competence principle consolidated in the arbitral universe. In doing so, the 2015 legislator creates a new modality of negative procedural presupposition in the judicial process. To analyze this new presupposition, its contours, and its limits in the new Brazilian code is the object and the challenge of this paper.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Goh, Nelson, and Kenneth Beale. "Due Process Challenges in Asia: An Emerging High Bar." Asian International Arbitration Journal 13, Issue 1 (December 1, 2017): 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/aiaj2017001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Economic growth in Asia has been accompanied by an increase in sophistication regarding dispute resolution processes. Arbitration continues to flourish, as is evidenced by the growth of arbitral institutions across the region. One challenge arbitration faces is the abuse of the due process protection afforded under the New York Convention and the UNCITRAL Model Law. During proceedings, parties may capitalise on arbitrators’ fear of an eventual challenge to seek to admit new evidence or to create more opportunities to present their case – resulting in an inefficient and protracted timeline. Post-award, losing parties may comb through the record in search of “evidence” that the arbitrators did not give them an opportunity to present their case. Despite the recent surge of concern in this area, jurisprudence from two Asian seats, Hong Kong and Singapore, suggests that the bar for such challenges has been set high. There also appears to have emerged from the case law a broad set of criteria which should guide courts when reviewing due process challenges. Interestingly, even though few of the Hong Kong and Singapore cases expressly refer to jurisprudence from other jurisdictions, they appear to be applying identical, universal, standards. This is encouraging for arbitration in Asia and for commercial parties that crave legal certainty and wish for finality in the arbitration process.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Klian, A. F. "PECULARITIES OF THE CHOICE OF ARBITRATORS BY THE PARTIES TO THE ARBITRATION PROCESS." Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law 58, no. 2 (2019): 187–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/2307-3322.58-2.41.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Kirati, Thoednithi. "Some Results from Arbitrage Opportunity on Nonlinear Wealth Processes." Transactions of the Institute of Systems, Control and Information Engineers 28, no. 7 (2015): 291–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.5687/iscie.28.291.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Jones, Lacey. "‘A Forming Poem’: Towards a Process Poetics." Literature and Theology 33, no. 3 (September 1, 2019): 262–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/litthe/frz026.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract Even as theopoetics turns to literary structures and grammatology to arbitrate between an Absolute and Absolute meaninglessness, John Caputo and David Miller are careful to separate its project from theopoetry’s representations of God. But this division makes little provision for figures like Denise Levertov, whose work suggests that the religious question is an inherently aesthetic one, that this arbitration can happen through representation. This article reads Levertov’s ‘The Tide’ in order to define a mode of signification unbound to spiritual fixity. Through its characterisation of both form and faith as process, ‘The Tide’ offers a new way of negotiating the relationship between literature and theology.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

전정원. "Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards by Arbitration Institutions in International Arbitration: Focusing on the ICC’s Scrutiny of Award Process." 법과정책 23, no. 2 (August 2017): 237–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.36727/jjlpr.23.2.201708.009.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

AUGUSTO VIANNA ALVES FERREIRA, OLAVO, and CARLOS EDUARDO MONTES NETTO. "CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DO ART. 189, IV DO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL." REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL 30, no. 118 (2022): 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.52028/rbdpro.v30i118.210913sp.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

A Lei de Arbitragem brasileira é omissa com relação à possibilidade de sigilo no procedimento arbitral, encontrando a confidencialidade previsão na maioria dos regulamentos das instituições arbitrais nacionais e estrangeiras. O art. 189, IV do Código de Processo Civil, por sua vez, assegura a confidencialidade nos processos judiciais que versem sobre arbitragem, inclusive sobre o cumprimento da carta arbitral, quando comprovada em juízo que as partes estipularam o sigilo do procedimento arbitral. O assunto é polêmico na doutrina e na jurisprudência, com decisões que reconhecem a inconstitucionalidade da mencionada norma. Nessa perspectiva, o objetivo do presente trabalho é analisar se é constitucional a previsão da possibilidade de tramitação em segredo de justiça dos processos judiciais que analisam arbitragens. Optou-se pela realização de uma pesquisa exploratória com a utilização de revisão bibliográfica e da análise qualitativa dos dados a fim de se cumprir esse objetivo, o que possibilitou inferir, ao final, a constitucionalidade do disposto no art. 189, IV do Código de Processo Civil.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Boog, Christopher. "The 2016 SIAC Rules: A State-of-the-Art Rules Revision Ensuring an even more Efficient Process." ASA Bulletin 34, Issue 3 (August 1, 2016): 584–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/asab2016050.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The sixth edition of the Arbitration Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (the “2016 SIAC Rules”) came into force on 1 August 2016. This article highlights the main amendments and innovations introduced by the 2016 SIAC Rules. The first part of the article outlines the background and main purpose of the revision. It then addresses the new provisions on joinder, consolidation and multiple contracts and compares them to similar provisions in other sets of institutional rules. It then turns to one of the major innovations of the 2016 Rules, a newly introduced mechanism for the early dismissal of claims and defences, and elaborates the changes made to improve the pre-existing provisions on the expedited and emergency arbitrator procedures. The article also touches upon changes of minor importance which nonetheless improve the overall arbitral process. Finally, it includes a brief introduction to the draft Investment Arbitration Rules, which combine the features of commercial and investment arbitration as well as a reminder of the SIAC-SIMAC Arb-Med-Arb procedure. With the adoption of the 2016 SIAC Rules, SIAC has brought its Rules in line with the most prominent sets of international arbitration rules and consolidates its position as one of the world's leading international arbitration centre.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Alhashemi, Azab Alaziz. "Importance of Qualitative Addition to the New Arbitration Rules in Settling International Disputes - Experience of the Kingdom of Bahrain International." Journal of Politics and Law 16, no. 1 (October 20, 2022): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v16n1p1.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

A complete set of procedural rules have been added in the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules and the parties agree on the application of arbitration procedures developed from this commercial relationship. These laws are widely used in arbitrations conducted by the institutions along with the ad hoc arbitrations. All the aspects of arbitration processes are covered by these rules such as setting out rules of procedure for appointing arbitrators, conducting arbitration proceedings, and modelling arbitration clause. The arbitration process also comprises of rules associated with form, impact, and interpretation of arbitral award. This study aims to investigate the experience of the Kingdom of Bahrain related to the addition of new arbitration rules. A detailed analysis of the newly developed changes has been conducted to provide important propositions. Findings of the study indicate that despite the effectiveness of newly developed changes, a few further amendments are required to increase the flow of international investments in Bahrain by providing the investors with the security they need.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Gill, Benjamin Ainsley. "Due Process Paranoia: Need We Be Cruel to Be Kind." Journal of International Arbitration 34, Issue 6 (December 1, 2017): 935–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2017044.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Due process paranoia is one of arbitration’s ‘hot topics’, but does it merit the heat? This article takes a view of the sources of and supposed justifications for due process paranoia in those (fortunately rare) cases where parties or counsel try to rig the arbitral process. It looks at who might be to blame for the reluctance of arbitrators to take measures to combat such activity, and considers some of the solutions that have been proposed to help deal with it. Overall, the authors suggest that all arbitration stakeholders are to a certain extent to blame, although arbitrators perhaps have the most work to do. It is therefore fortunate that they have the wide support of domestic judges and the arbitral institutions, as well as a substantial toolbox at their disposal with which to combat recalcitrant or bad faith parties.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Reyes Sinisterra, Cindy Charlotte. "El llamamiento en garantía en el proceso arbitral en Colombia: ¿arbitraje obligatorio o voluntario?" Civilizar 17, no. 33 (July 24, 2017): 39–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.22518/16578953.898.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Durante varios años el concepto de tercero ha sido concebido, dentro de lo que concierne a la doctrina procesal en Colombia, desde una perspectiva confusa, específicamente en el caso del llamado en garantía, dejando de lado, el hecho de que si bien al inicio del proceso no pudiera aparecer claramente como una de las partes que intervendrán de forma principal, será una parte sobreviniente, lo que debe interpretarse en coherencia con lo que se podría decir es en Colombia un arbitraje forzoso; en la medida en que el estudio de Constitucionalidad de la norma en mención presenta algunas contradicciones que serán revisadas en el desarrollo de este artículo.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

De Jong, M. "Arbitration of family separation issues – a useful adjunct to mediation and the court process." Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 17, no. 6 (November 14, 2014): 2356. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v17i6.04.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

For over half a century now, section 2(a) of the Arbitration Act 42 of 1965 has prohibited arbitration in respect of matrimonial and related matters. In this article it will be illustrated that this prohibition is clearly incompatible with present-day demands. Today there is a strong tendency in public policy towards alternative dispute resolution processes such as arbitration. As any recommendations that arbitration should be applied to family law disputes must be anchored in an analysis of the specific character of the arbitral remedy, the article begins by giving a broad overview of the nature of arbitration. This is followed by a discussion of the present-day demand for family arbitration, which examines the problems experienced with the adversarial system of litigation in resolving family law disputes, party autonomy, the development of alternative dispute resolution processes such as mediation and arbitration, the special synergy between mediation and arbitration, the success of arbitration in other fields of law and possible forerunners for family arbitration in South Africa. Inherent in the demand for family law arbitration are the many advantages of arbitration, which are also touched upon. Thirdly, current trends in England, Australia, the United States of America, Canada and India are analysed so as to identify a suitable family law arbitration model for South Africa. Special attention is paid to the matters that should be referred to arbitration – for example, should it be confined to matrimonial property and financial disputes or extended to all matters incidental to divorce or family breakdown, including children's issues? Other questions examined include whether family arbitration should comply with substantive law only, who should act as arbitrators, whether family arbitration should be voluntary or compulsory, what the court's role in the family arbitration process should be, and whether family law arbitration should be regulated by the existing Arbitration Act or by a separate statute with specialised rules for family matters. Lastly, it is concluded that although family arbitration will not have universal appeal or common application, it should be encouraged and enforceable for those who choose this private alternative dispute settlement technique to resolve their family disputes.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

de Carvalho Aprigliano, Ricardo. "Processo Arbitral e Sistema." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 9, Issue 34 (June 1, 2012): 241–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2012035.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Gabbay, Daniela Monteiro. "Processo Arbitral: Aspectos Transnacionais." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 11, Issue 43 (September 1, 2014): 231–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2014048.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Campbell, Mark. "Setting aside arbitral awards in Singapore: due process and good faith obligations." Arbitration International 36, no. 3 (August 8, 2020): 429–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiaa028.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract The Singapore Court of Appeal in CMNC v Jaguar Energy has offered clarification on what it identified as an ‘important area of arbitration law’: ie the correct approach to alleged violations of due process by tribunals in their management of the arbitral procedure. The case involved setting aside proceedings in the context of a complex dispute further complicated by the parties’ prior agreement for an expedited procedure. The Court of Appeal judgment takes a robust approach towards alleged due process violations. It emphasizes that the matter must be assessed according to a test of reasonableness and fairness with careful reference to the circumstances, and that courts should be cautious about interfering with a tribunal’s decision-making where there is a rational basis for those decisions. But CMNC v Jaguar Energy is notable for another reason: the presumption by the judge at first instance that there was implied into the arbitration agreement an obligation to arbitrate in good faith. That point may be of particular interest to those from common law jurisdictions where a more general debate over the role of good faith obligations in commercial contracts persists.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Bockstiegel, K. H. "States in the International Arbitral Process." Arbitration International 2, no. 1 (January 1, 1986): 22–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/2.1.22.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Park, W. W. "Judicial Controls in the Arbitral Process." Arbitration International 5, no. 3 (September 1, 1989): 230–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/5.3.230.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

da Silveira, Marcelo Matos Amaro. "Das astreintes no processo arbitral: reflexões sobre o poder coercitivo do Tribunal Arbitral no Direito Luso-brasileiro." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 15, Issue 58 (June 1, 2018): 54–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2018018.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

RESUMO: A efetividade do processo arbitral está, muitas vezes, relacionada com eventuais decisões ou medidas antecipadas que devem ser dadas pelo tribunal arbitral. A produção de certa prova antecipada, o arresto de certo bem ou a execução de certa obrigação de fazer ou não fazer podem ser cruciais para o alcance do objetivo maior da arbitragem, que é a solução mais justa do conflito entre as partes. A discussão sobre o cabimento de tais medidas perdurou durante muito tempo na doutrina “lusófona” da arbitragem, sendo certo que, atualmente, é aceita tanto em Portugal quanto no Brasil. Se o cabimento não é mais questionável, a análise, portanto, passa à sua efetividade. Como será possível que o tribunal arbitral, ao determinar certa medida antecipada, torne tal provimento efetivo? Quais os mecanismos existentes no Direito que podem dar força para tais determinações? O presente trabalho pretende exatamente se debruçar nesse assunto, e apreciar se há um eventual poder coercitivo dos tribunais arbitrais no direito arbitral “luso-brasileiro”. Para tanto, será avaliada a possibilidade da aplicação das astreintes no processo arbitral, tanto em Portugal quanto no Brasil, por meio de um escrutínio sobre sua aplicação geral e, posteriormente, sua utilização específica. ABSTRACT: The effectiveness of the arbitration process is often related to decisions or anticipated measures that must be given by the arbitration court. The production of some early evidence, the arrest of a certain good, or the execution of a certain obligation may be crucial to the achievement of the main objective of arbitration, which is the fairest solution to the conflict between the parties. The discussion in the “lusophone” doctrine of arbitration about the suitability of such measures has long remained, being currently admitted and accepted in both Portugal and Brazil. If its appropriateness is no longer questionable, the analysis, therefore, becomes about its effectiveness. How the arbitration court can guarantee that the early provision will be effective? What are the mechanisms in law that may give strength to such determinations? The present paper intends to address this subject, and to assess if there is an eventual coercive power of the arbitration court in the “luso-brazilian” arbitration law. Therefore, it will be evaluated the possibility of the application of the astreintes in the arbitration process, in both Portuguese and Brazilian law, through a scrutiny of its general application and later its specific use.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Fay, Mary S., and Anne K. Morrill. "The Grievance-Arbitration Process." JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration 15, no. 6 (June 1985): 11???16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005110-198506000-00005.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Devkota, Sanad. "Viewpoint of the Supreme Court of Nepal on the Arbitration Process in the Light of Party Autonomy." Tribhuvan University Journal 35, no. 2 (December 31, 2020): 47–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v35i2.36189.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Arbitration is a contract-based form of binding dispute resolution. In other words, a party’s right to refer a dispute to arbitration depends on the existence of an agreement between them and the other parties to the dispute that the dispute may be referred to arbitration. Arbitration is a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several individuals can make a decision about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments. The arbitration process is similar to a trial in that the parties make opening statements and present evidence to the arbitrator. Conflicts have existed in all cultures, religions and societies since time immemorial, as long as human have walked the earth. Human society is a repertoire where differences arise and persist as salient features, but this is also a platform where varieties of disputes find management in the form of resolution to energize the society. As conflicts are an integral part of human interaction, one must learn to deal with them tactfully, conventionally, disputes – commercial or otherwise were resolved by litigation but due to delays, costs, publicity and technicality associated with litigation, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes evolved. Various means of ADR or out of court settlement of disputes such as negotiation, conciliation and arbitration have come into practice. In the modern era, the business activities are increasing day by day. Along with the business activities, its complexities, differences, and disputes are also increasing day by day. The traditional method of settling disputes is the litigation process in the court of law. From the perspective of concerned parties, settlement of these disputes as quick as possible is desired. But because of the lengthily procedure and case load settlement through court is not possible. For this reason, parties were looking for the alternative process where both the parties can trust impartial person who will solve their disputes within short period of time.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Mair, Julia. "Equal Treatment of Parties in the Nomination Process of Arbitrators in Multi-Party Arbitration and Consolidated Proceedings." Austrian Review of International and European Law Online 12, no. 1 (2010): 59–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15736512-01201016.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Mair, Julia. "Equal Treatment of Parties in the Nomination Process of Arbitrators in Multi-Party Arbitration and Consolidated Proceedings." Austrian Review of International and European Law Online 12, no. 1 (2010): 59–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15736512-90000016.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Bevilacqua, Thomas, and Ricardo Ugarte. "Ensuring Party Equality in the Process of Designating Arbitrators in Multiparty Arbitration: An Update on the Governing Provisions." Journal of International Arbitration 27, Issue 1 (February 1, 2010): 9–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2010003.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The arbitration world has long struggled with how best to ensure fairness in the appointment of arbitrators in disputes among three or more parties. The French Cour de cassation’s 1992 Dutco decision is widely credited with calling attention to the question and with spurring leading arbitration institutes to revise their rules to address the appointment process in multiparty cases. Although the solutions adopted differ in some particulars, most major sets of rules now either permit, or else require, the institute to designate the entire tribunal in certain multiparty instances. A number of national arbitration laws also address the question in various ways, with one common thread existing in a sizeable subset of these laws: their protective provisions apply whenever one party enjoys a privileged role in the designation process. This article also examines the relatively modest body of arbitral and judicial precedents existing on the question, and this examination reveals two emerging trends: treating multiple parties named on the same “side” of a dispute as a single entity, and finding that those multiple parties have similar interests. Either of these “solutions” allows multiparty arbitrations to be handled as if they were classic bipartite arbitrations, and for difficulties in the constitution of tribunals to be avoided. The authors conclude that the simplest solution is for parties more routinely to use their arbitration agreements to empower respected arbitration institutes to appoint the entire tribunal, either in all cases or upon the appearance of a disagreement as to a designation among multiple parties on either side.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Majeed, N. "Good Faith and Due Process: Lessons from the Shari'ah." Arbitration International 20, no. 1 (March 1, 2004): 97–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/20.1.97.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Ferreira, Maria Paula da Rosa, and Rosane Beatris Mariano da Rocha Barcellos Terra. "fronteiras da interferência judicial no processo arbitral." Revista de Direito 13, no. 01 (March 22, 2021): 01–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.32361/2021130111813.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

A presente pesquisa visa responder ao dilema de como se conciliam a arbitragem e a jurisdição estatal no contexto brasileiro. Por meio de uma reflexão sobre a arbitragem e as fronteiras que a circundam, impõe-se o questionamento quanto aos limites e às possibilidades da interferência judicial no processo arbitral. Estruturou-se a produção em três tópicos de análise, sendo estes: o controle judicial sobre a jurisdição arbitral; a complementariedade entre as jurisdições arbitrais e estatais; e, as relações entre a arbitragem e o Poder Judiciário. Como método de abordagem, aplicou-se o dedutivo. Como método de procedimento, empregou-se o monográfico. Observou-se como fundamental a busca pelo equilíbrio harmônico entre a arbitragem com o devido processo legal. Sendo assim, verificou-se que a arbitragem não pode ser avaliada por um viés de absoluta independência do Poder Judiciário, tendo em vista que cabe à jurisdição estatal prestar o devido suporte e assistência ao processo arbitral.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Galindo-Romero, Laura, and Victoria Narancio. "Colombia: New Presidential Directive Seeks to Increase Governmental Oversight over Arbitration Agreements and the Arbitral Selection Process." Journal of International Arbitration 33, Issue 4 (August 1, 2016): 417–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2016024.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This note summarizes Colombia’s new 2015 Presidential Directive which seeks to increase governmental control over the use of arbitration agreements in state contracts, and the arbitral selection process in disputes arising out of these contracts. It also addresses certain potentially undesirable consequences that might arise from the presidential directive and proposes a number of practical steps that the Colombian government could take to ensure public officials continue to enter into arbitration agreements and thus reduce the potential anti-arbitration impact of the 2015 Presidential Directive.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Saha, Soumyajit, and Smriti Shukla. "Resurrecting the debate on ‘due process paranoia’ in Centrotrade: Paranoia or Judiciousness?" Arbitration International 36, no. 4 (August 28, 2020): 521–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiaa035.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract Recently, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Centrotrade Minerals and Metals Inc v Hindustan Copper Ltd, rejected an application for non-enforcement of a foreign award and justified its ‘pro-enforcement’ bias. The Apex Court was of the opinion that there was no due process violation as the arbitrator provided enough opportunities to the parties to present the case but the respondent failed to abide by the timelines. Although, the Court has correctly interpreted the scope of due process but unfortunately, failed to address the repeated extension of arbitral proceeding at the cost of efficiency and speed. On a closer study, the Apex Court’s ruling resurrects a puzzling question of the arbitrator’s perceived reluctance to reject dilatory tactics of the respondent during arbitral proceeding. This article examines the implications of the ruling on arbitrators as they may be more exposed to the unscrupulous attempts of the parties to wilful delay under the garb of ‘due process paranoia’.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Alves, Rafael Francisco. "Convenção de Arbitragem e Processo Arbitral." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 6, Issue 24 (December 1, 2009): 234–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2009080.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Kochetkov, Aleksandr. "Simplified procedure in arbitration process." Journal of Legal Studies 1, no. 3 (September 25, 2016): 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/21595.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Dias, Feliciano Alcides, and Natacha Juli Georg. "A PRODUÇÃO DE PROVAS NA ARBITRAGEM BRASILEIRA." Ponto de Vista Jurídico 7, no. 1 (August 9, 2018): 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.33362/juridico.v7i1.1650.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

<p class="resumo">Esta pesquisa tem a finalidade de analisar a produção de provas no processo arbitral, de acordo com as disposições do Código de Processo Civil brasileiro, a partir da escolha pelas partes na instituição da arbitragem. Para tanto, a produção das provas cíveis é abordada, através do método dedutivo e acervo bibliográfico, na legislação processual brasileira para posterior compreensão do cabimento destas perante o juízo arbitral, cuja busca pela verdade real passa a ter maior concretude diante da vontade das partes. Em comparação com o processo judicial, investiga-se a celeridade do procedimento probatório e as implicações na produção das provas cíveis perante a arbitragem brasileira e o funcionamento do processo arbitral. Verifica-se a possibilidade de que testemunhas técnicas imitam opinião sobre determinado assunto, baseado nos conhecimentos técnicos especializados antes da audiência de instrução no juízo arbitral, com a finalidade de reduzir o tempo, os custos do processo e também afastar eventuais surpresas no julgamento do conflito.</p><p class="resumo"><strong>Palavras-chave: </strong>Arbitragem. Produção de Provas. Código de Processo Civil. Resolução dos Conflitos.</p><h3>THE PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE IN BRAZILIAN ARBITRATION</h3><div><p class="abstractCxSpFirst"><strong>Abstract: </strong>This research has the purpose of analyzing the production of evidence in the arbitration process, in accordance with the provisions of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, based on the choice by the parties in the arbitration institution. In order to do so, the production of civil evidence is approached, through the deductive method and bibliographic collection, in the Brazilian procedural law for later understanding of the arbitration court's jurisdiction, whose search for the real truth becomes more concrete in the face of the will of the parties. In comparison with the judicial process, the speed of the probative procedure and the implications in the production of the civil evidence before the Brazilian arbitration and the operation of the arbitration process are investigated. There is a possibility that technical witnesses imitate an opinion on a particular matter, based on specialized technical knowledge prior to the arbitration hearing, in order to reduce the time, costs of the process and also to avoid any surprises in the trial of the conflict.</p><p class="abstractCxSpLast"><strong>Keywords: </strong>Arbitration. Production of Evidence. Code of Civil Procedure. Conflict Resolution.</p></div>

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Castro-Portales, Diego, and María P. Moraga-Navarro. "Resolución de conflictos al interior de las organizaciones de usuarios de aguas en Chile: ¿judicialización o arbitraje?" Agricultura Sociedad y Desarrollo 12, no. 3 (September 30, 2015): 319. http://dx.doi.org/10.22231/asyd.v12i3.233.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Las alternativas o vías utilizadas actualmente para la solución de conflictos, esto es, la judicialización o el arbitraje no serían aparentemente los únicos caminos existentes para la resolución de las controversias de carácter trascendente para los usuarios de los cauces. En efecto, por una parte creemos que no obtendremos nada productivo si el legislador continúa agregando nuevos procedimientos, tanto para los arbitrajes como para los procesos propiamente judiciales. Esto se debe a que si estos nuevos procedimientos se utilizan diariamente, no cumplen con los fines esperados. Para abordar y solucionar la situación planteada creemos del todo factible que sean las Juntas de Vigilancia las que, utilizando al Directorio como árbitro arbitrador, resuelvan en primera instancia, como lo hacen en la actualidad, los conflictos surgidos en todo su territorio.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Beatris Mariano da Rocha Barcellos Terra, Rosane, Guilherme Streit Carraro, and Maria Paula da Rosa Ferreira. "As fronteiras da interferência judicial no processo arbitral." Revista Direito em Debate 31, no. 58 (November 14, 2022): e9491. http://dx.doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2022.58.9491.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

A presente pesquisa visa responder ao dilema de como se conciliam a arbitragem e a jurisdição estatal no contexto brasileiro. Por meio de uma reflexão sobre a arbitragem e as fronteiras que a circundam, impõe-se o questionamento quanto aos limites e possibilidades da interferência judicial no processo arbitral, para tanto, estruturou-se a produção em três tópicos de análise, sendo estes: O controle judicial sobre a jurisdição arbitral; A complementariedade entre as jurisdições arbitrais e estatais; E, as relações entre a arbitragem e o Poder Judiciário. Como método de abordagem, aplicou-se o dedutivo, partindo-se de premissas tidas como verdadeiras para se chegar a uma conclusão lógica. Como método de procedimento, empregou-se o monográfico. Observou-se como fundamental a busca pelo equilíbrio harmônico entre a garantia da arbitragem com o devido processo legal. Sendo assim, verificou-se que a arbitragem não pode ser avaliada por um viés de absoluta independência do Poder Judiciário, tendo em vista que cabe à jurisdição estatal prestar o devido suporte e assistência ao seu processo.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Leite, Clarisse Frechiani Lara. "Arbitragem e Tutela de Urgência: Confronto entre os Sistemas Brasileiro e Português." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 14, Issue 56 (December 1, 2017): 35–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2017058.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

RESUMO: O artigo apresenta análise comparada da tutela de urgência na arbitragem doméstica no Brasil e em Portugal, à luz do Código de Processo Civil brasileiro de 2015 e da Lei da Arbitragem brasileira (Lei nº 9.307/1996, com alterações promovidas pela Lei nº 13.129/2015), bem como do Código de Processo Civil português de 2013 e da Lei de Arbitragem Voluntária portuguesa de 2011. ABSTRACT: This article presents a comparative analysis of interim mesures in Domestic Arbitration in Brazil and Portugal, in accordance to Brazilian Civil Procedure Code (2015), Brazilian Arbitration Law (Lex nº 9.307/1996, modified by Lex nº 13.129/2015), Portuguese Civil Procedure Code (2013) and Portuguese Voluntary Arbitration Law (2011).

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

Nestoliy, Vyacheslav. "CIVIL PROCESS IN THE COURT OF ARBITRATION (CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM OF THE DOCTRINAL DEFINITIONOF ARBITRATION PROCESS)." Journal about Law 2, no. 1 (March 25, 2014): 14–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.15727/2313-6715.2014.2.1.14-26.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

Gonzalez, Ewerton Zeydir, Carla Dendasck, and Adonias Osias Silva. "Processo Arbitral- Formação do Tribunal e Instrução processual." Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento 01, no. 03 (May 3, 2016): 68–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.32749/nucleodoconhecimento.com.br/lei/processo-arbitral-formacao-do-tribunal-e-instrucao-processual.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Parente, Eduardo de Albuquerque. "Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 8, Issue 30 (April 1, 2011): 168–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2011030.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Ramírez, Francisco de Asís, Andrés Seco, and Luis Miqueleiz. "The arbitration process in civil engineering." Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law 166, no. 1 (February 2013): 43–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/mpal.11.00005.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

Gnaedinger, John P. "Mediation/Arbitration: Alternative Dispute Resolution Process." Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 1, no. 3 (August 1987): 150–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(1987)1:3(150).

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Gaillard, Emmanuel. "Abuse of Process in International Arbitration." ICSID Review 32, no. 1 (December 24, 2016): 17–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siw036.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

48

Pridvorova, M. N. "Conciliation procedures in the arbitration process." Право и государство: теория и практика, no. 12 (2022): 218–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.47643/1815-1337_2022_12_218.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Kolo, A. "Witness Intimidation, Tampering and Other Related Abuses of Process in Investment Arbitration: Possible Remedies Available to the Arbitral Tribunal." Arbitration International 26, no. 1 (March 1, 2010): 43–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/26.1.43.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Voser, N. "Arbitrability and the Applicable Law in the Claims Resolution Process for Dormant Accounts in Switzerland." Arbitration International 15, no. 3 (September 1, 1999): 237–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/15.3.237.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!