Книги: "Arbitration Seat"

1

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Dispute settlement mechanisms. Delhi, India: Academic Publications, 1985.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Talmon, Stefan, and Bing Bing Jia. The South China Sea arbitration: A Chinese perspective. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart Publishing, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

The Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago Arbitration Award of 2006. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Adede, A. O. The system for settlement of disputes under the United Nations convention on the law of the sea: A drafting history and a commentary. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 1987.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Jauch, Heidi Kerstin. Aufrechnung und Verrechnung in der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit: Eine rehsvergleichende Studie Deutschland/Schweiz. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre, 2001.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Heryandi. Hukum laut internasional: Pengaturan zona maritim dalam United Nations Conventions on the Law of the Sea, 1982 dan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia. Bandarlampung: Pusat Penerbitan, Lembaga Penelitian, Universitas Lampung, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia. International maritime arbitration: Materials prepared for a seminar in Vancouver, British Columbia on May 26 and 27, 1988. Vancouver: The Society, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Bugarčić, Bojan. Doprinos Međunarodnog suda pravde i arbitražnih tribunala razvoju pravila delimitacije u pravu mora. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Ertan, Kerem. Deniz hukukunda Londra'da tahkim. Cağaloğlu, İstanbul: Beta, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Oude Elferink, Alex G., 1962- and Rothwell Donald 1959-, eds. Oceans management in the 21st century: Institutional frameworks and responses. Leiden: M. Nijhoff, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Gabrielle, Kaufmann-Kohler, and Rigozzi Antonio. 2 The Law of the Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199679751.003.0002.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This second chapter starts by clarifying the concept of ‘law of the arbitration’ or lex arbitri, underscoring that any arbitration needs to be governed by a national law of arbitration. The chapter then examines how to determine the national arbitration law that governs a specific arbitration by analysing the scope of application of the national arbitration law, especially Chapter 12 of the Private International Law Act (PILA), and distinguishing between international and domestic arbitrations. In this context, the chapter addresses the legal significance the seat of the arbitration, the practical considerations that should guide the selection of the seat, as well as the possibility for parties to arbitrations seated in Switzerland to opt in or out of the (international or domestic) regime governing the arbitration. Finally, the chapter describes the main features of national arbitration laws using Chapter 12 PILA as an example.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

John, Choong. 1 Arbitration in Singapore. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198810650.003.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Singapore is the most popular seat for international arbitration in Asia, and the fourth most popular seat in the world. Over 2,500 cases have been referred to the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) in the 26 years since it first opened its doors, making it reportedly the fifth most popular institution for international arbitrations globally. This chapter first discusses the factors that explain Singapore's popularity as a place for international arbitration. These include government and legislative support, judicial support, reputation for neutrality, stable and predictable laws, and cultural and legal links to its Asian neighbours. It then details the rise of the SIAC and the structure and content of the present volume.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

V V, Veeder. Part I International Arbitration Law, Arbitral Jurisdiction, and Arbitral Institutions, 3 The New 2014 LCIA Rules: An Introductory Explanation. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter discusses the revised rules of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). The revisions fall into two basic groups: changes to correct earlier drafting inconsistencies (from 1981 to 1998), inaccurate reflections of actual LCIA practice, and excessively English legal language for an international arbitration; and new procedures decided by the LCIA. These revisions include the increased use of electronic communications by parties with the LCIA registry and LCIA tribunals, particularly for starting an LCIA arbitration; the procedure for an emergency arbitrator; changes to the default arbitral seat of an LCIA arbitration; the consolidation, etc., of different arbitrations for multi-party disputes; and a solution to the ‘Slovenia’ problem regarding potential conflicts between an arbitrator and a party’s legal representative.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Michael, Ostrove, Salomon Claudia, and Shifman Bette, eds. Choice of Venue in International Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199655717.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The relative merits of different arbitral venues are conveyed accessibly and practically in this far-reaching survey, with contributions from prestigious practitioners from every major global seat. The book offers comparative analysis of the relative challenges arising at venues around the world, supported by a Scorecard of Venue Issues to allow easy comparison. A reliable tool during the negotiation and drafting stages, it enables a newly tactical consideration of venue, whilst providing instant answers to those in unfamiliar jurisdictions. Offering detailed analysis of a range of key venues, it addresses not only the practical reality but also the history and development in these seats, making the book both an academic and a practical investment.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Renato, Nazzini. Part III International Arbitration Agreements: Issues and Perspectives, 9 The Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement: A Transnational Solution? Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0010.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter examines the law applicable to the arbitration agreement when there is no express choice of such a law. It does not aim to set out a test, or a set of tests, of universal validity or application. Rather, its objective is to review the current state of play and sketch out a framework for the development of a possible ‘transnational’ solution to the problem. The chapter first explains why a separate enquiry into the law governing the arbitration agreement is necessary and what the implications of such a separate enquiry are. Second, it reviews three possible approaches to determining the law governing the arbitration agreement: the application of the law chosen by the parties to govern their substantive rights and obligations; the application of the law of the seat of the arbitration; and the application of ‘transnational’ rules.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Paul D, Friedland, and Nyer Damien. 3 Drafting Considerations for Clauses Designating New York as the Place of Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198753483.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter offers recommendations for drafting arbitration clauses that provide for international arbitration in New York. It addresses preliminary issues that, irrespective of the chosen seat of arbitration, must be considered. The literature on this topic is extensive and is summarized accordingly, but the basic rule when drafting an arbitration clause is to start with a model clause. This is so whether or not the clause provides for arbitration in New York. In addition, the chapter also discusses considerations that are specific to arbitration clauses designating New York as the place of arbitration, and offers proposed wording. And, as explained in Chapter 1, the arbitration law applicable to arbitrations located in New York stems from the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), the New York Convention and the Panama Convention, and the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR).

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Michael, Moser, and Bao Chiann. 1 Introduction to Arbitration in Hong Kong. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198712251.003.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This introductory chapter discusses the contributing factors that make Hong Kong a global arbitration centre that ‘meets or even exceeds all standards’ in the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators’ ten principles of an effective, efficient, and ‘safe’ seat of international arbitration. Hong Kong has long been at the forefront of international arbitration developments. It enjoys a high degree of autonomy (except in defence and foreign affairs) and retains a separate legal system from that of mainland China. Hong Kong’s legal system is based on the English common law and is guaranteed in Hong Kong’s constitutional instrument, the Basic Law. Furthermore, Hong Kong has a long tradition of upholding the rule of law and judicial independence, which are two key foundations for the city’s success as a global dispute resolution centre.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Jeffery, Commission, and Moloo Rahim. 9 Other Procedures. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198729037.003.0009.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter examines other procedures in investment arbitration proceedings, with particular emphasis on how International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and UNCITRAL tribunals have addressed them in practice. ICSID has schematically set out what it describes as ‘the steps in the process’ in an ICSID arbitration using a flow chart. However, this flow chart is not able to anticipate with much certainty the potential impact of certain other procedures. The chapter first explains the determination of the legal place or seat of arbitration in non-ICSID Convention arbitrations before discussing the practice of early dismissal mechanisms, specifically, ICSID Rule 41(5) objections for manifest lack of legal merit. It then considers the question of site visits conducted by tribunals in ICSID and UNCITRAL arbitrations, the practice of tribunal-appointed experts, and requests for reconsideration. It also outlines the features of multi-party arbitration, including the procedures and issues associated with mass claims.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Doug Jones, AO. 18 Sydney. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199655717.003.0019.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter evaluates the merits of Sydney as a venue for international arbitration proceedings. It discusses the history and development of arbitration in Australia; the processes and rules involved as well as the role of courts in the conduct of arbitration proceedings; and rules for arbitral awards. It concludes that Sydney has a robust legal framework that adheres to internationally accepted standards. Its judiciary is independent and supportive of arbitration, and Sydney offers affordable and convenient facilities for arbitration, as well as effective institutional support and the availability of specialized legal advice. Given its proximity to some of the world's economic hubs, Sydney is an ideal option for parties who are interested in an affordable, independent, and supportive seat for international arbitrations.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Stephen, Jagusch, and Triantafilou Epaminontas E. 10 London. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199655717.003.0011.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter summarizes the key aspects of the English legal system with respect to the role of courts in arbitrations seated in England and Wales. First, it highlights the key provisions of relevant English legislation, mainly of the English Arbitration Act of 1996 and the principal court decisions arising under that legislation. Second, it describes the manner in which English law as the law of the seat affects the role of English courts in the course of three discrete stages: before the award, after the award, and during recognition and enforcement. In the process and where necessary, it addresses and ultimately rejects recently articulated concerns questioning the supremacy of England and Wales as an arbitration seat. The chapter concludes that England and Wales possesses a comprehensive and clearly articulated legal framework governing arbitration, and a sophisticated, impartial judiciary with ample experience in complex arbitral disputes and the collateral issues they raise under both English law and foreign laws and regulations. The jurisdiction is distinctly arbitration-friendly, with a keen understanding of the benefits arbitration aims to confer on parties, and the policy considerations such benefits entail.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Michael, Moser, and Bao Chiann. 9 Conduct of the Arbitration (Articles 13–22, 25–26, 30–31). Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198712251.003.0009.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter addresses a number of key procedural steps and principles in an HKIAC arbitration. It begins with a discussion of the general principles governing the conduct of proceedings, followed by rules concerning the seat and venue of the arbitration and the language of the arbitration. The chapter then analyses the filing of and amendment to the parties’ written submissions. Next, the chapter discusses the arbitral tribunal’s authority to rule on its own jurisdiction as well as HKIAC’s prima facie power to proceed with an arbitration. The remainder of the chapter covers evidentiary matters and hearings, experts appointed by the arbitral tribunal, non-participation of a party in the arbitral proceedings, closure of the proceedings, and the waiver of a party’s right to object.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Pascal, Hollander, and Draye Maarten. 1 Brussels. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199655717.003.0002.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter evaluates the merits of Brussels as a venue for international arbitration proceedings. It discusses the history and development of arbitration in Belgium; the processes and rules involved as well as the role of courts in the conduct of arbitration proceedings; and rules for arbitral awards. It concludes that the revision of the Belgian Law on Arbitration (BLA) based on the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law in 2013 has resulted in a modern, state of the art, and progressive arbitration law, which is characterized by flexibility and demonstrates the will of the Belgian legislator to provide an efficient framework for a modern business environment within which arbitration can proceed in the best possible circumstances. The geographical position of Brussels, its status as an international administrative and business center, and the relatively low cost of arbitrating in Brussels further explain why it is increasingly chosen as a seat for arbitration.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Michael J, Moser, and Choong John. 8 Hong Kong. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199655717.003.0009.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter evaluates the merits of Hong Kong as a venue for international arbitration proceedings. Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China (PRC). British rule ended in 1997, with the PRC assuming sovereignty under the ‘one country, two systems’ principle. Hong Kong has long been one of the leading arbitral seats in Asia. Its prominence as a leading arbitral seat is due in large part to the establishment of the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) in 1985 and adoption in 1990 of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Arbitration law and practice has remained unaffected by the handover to the PRC. Today Hong Kong continues to be widely regarded as one of the leading arbitral venues in Asia, particularly for China-related disputes. In addition, Hong Kong is also increasingly seen as one of the leading international arbitration seats worldwide.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Nigel, Blackaby, Partasides Constantine, Redfern Alan, and Hunter Martin. 6 Conduct of the Proceedings. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198714248.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter outlines the conduct of the tribunal and the parties during arbitration proceedings. In general, an arbitral tribunal must conduct the arbitration in accordance with the procedure agreed by the parties. If it fails to do so, the award may be set aside, or refused recognition and enforcement. However, the freedom of the parties to dictate the procedure to be followed in an international arbitration is not unrestricted. The procedure must comply with any mandatory rules and public policy requirements of the law of the juridical seat of the arbitration. It must also take into account the provisions of the international rules on arbitration, such as those of the ICC, which aim to ensure that arbitral proceedings are conducted fairly. Accordingly, a balance must be struck between the parties’ wishes concerning the procedure to be followed and any overriding requirements of the legal regime that governs the arbitration.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Congress, United States 53rd, 2nd Session Senate, and Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration. Fur Seal Arbitration; Volume 10. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2018.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

Michael, Moser, and Bao Chiann. 11 Awards, Decisions, and Orders of the Arbitral Tribunal (Articles 32–40). Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198712251.003.0011.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter discusses section V of the HKIAC Rules. It provides the framework for making awards, decisions, and orders by the arbitral tribunal in HKIAC arbitrations. It also addresses the costs of arbitration and deposits for such costs. The process of rendering an award under the HKIAC Rules involves the following stages: the closure of hearings, deliberation, the reaching of a decision, the assessment of costs, the rendering of the award, and the transmission of the award. The award will typically comprise the following elements: the identification of the parties, the specification of the date of the award and the seat of the arbitration, the procedural history, the summary of the factual background and the issues in dispute, the substantive analysis for the decision, and the specification of any orders to be carried out by the parties.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

David J, Sandy. Part XI Public Policy and Abuse of Process, 33 The Role of Abuse of Process in Protecting the Integrity of Arbitration Awards. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0034.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Although arbitration awards are final and binding, losing parties may sometimes commence a second set of proceedings on slightly different grounds from the first in an attempt to raise doubt over the status and enforceability of the first award and/or to delay enforcement. In England, the doctrine of abuse of process has been utilized to prevent a second action being pursued. The English courts have developed the principle to prevent collateral attacks on prior judgments and, now, arbitral awards and by so doing, ensure the finality of judgments and awards. This chapter outlines the reasoning behind these decisions and asks whether there is a basis upon which such powers should be available in arbitration more generally, whatever the seat, rules, procedural or governing law. Should the principle of abuse of process, in so far as it prevents a collateral attack on a prior arbitration award, be a power which is generally available to tribunals? If so, what is the source of that power and how should it be exercised? Will arbitration benefit from the recognition of this principle? The chapter suggests that, in most cases, the source of the principle of abuse of process can be more readily found in the parties’ private agreement rather than having to be located in the public policy of any system of law which might be applicable.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Essam Al, Tamimi, and Karrar-Lewsley Robert. 5 Dubai. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199655717.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) is an English-language, common law jurisdiction in the heart of Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE). It has its own civil and commercial laws distinct from the rest of the UAE, and an English-style common law court system. The DIFC adheres to the New York Convention and has a modern arbitration law based on the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law. It also hosts an international arbitration center, the DIFC-LCIA. This chapter begins with an overview of the DIFC and its legal system. It then reviews its arbitration law and the practical considerations that need to be taken into account when choosing the DIFC as an arbitral seat. It argues that DIFC provides a good, if relatively untested, seat for arbitration. It has a comprehensive and modern Model Law-based arbitration law, and an efficient and pro-arbitration English language court system to act as the curial court. DIFC awards have been enforced within the UAE and should be readily enforceable outside the DIFC pursuant to the New York Convention.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Mark, Mangan, Reed Lucy, and Choong John. 8 The Conduct of Proceedings. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199657216.003.0008.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter discusses the conduct of proceedings in an arbitration of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC). An arbitration shall be conducted fairly, and economically, so that it leads to a final determination of the dispute as established in the general principles of SIAC Rule 16. The parties' written submissions should be presented to the Tribunal in the early stage of the arbitration as stated in SIAC Rule 17. SIAC arbitration must have a legal seat or place. It must be connected to Singapore's laws of jurisdiction, and be subject to supervision by the courts of that place.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Nigel, Blackaby, Partasides Constantine, Redfern Alan, and Hunter Martin. 10 Challenge of Arbitral Awards. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198714248.003.0010.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter discusses the challenge or appeal of arbitral awards by the losing party of arbitration. Under the New York Convention and the UNICTRAL Model Law, the purpose of challenging an award is to have the court declare all, or part, of the award null and void. If an award is set aside or annulled by the relevant court, it will usually be treated as invalid and accordingly unenforceable not only by the courts of the seat of arbitration, but also by national courts elsewhere. The chapter describes the various methods of challenge: ‘internal’ challenge; the correction and interpretation of awards; the issuance of additional awards; and the remission of awards. If the challenge is successful, the court may decide to confirm the award, refer it back to the arbitrary tribunal, vary the award, or set it aside in whole or in part.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration. Fur Seal Arbitration: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris, Under the Treaty Between the United States ... and Great Britain, ... Determination of Questions Between the Two. Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration. Fur Seal Arbitration: Proceedings Of The Tribunal Of Arbitration, Convened At Paris, Under The Treaty Between The United States ... And Great Britain, ... Determination Of Questions Between The Two. Arkose Press, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration. Fur Seal Arbitration: Proceedings Of The Tribunal Of Arbitration, Convened At Paris, Under The Treaty Between The United States ... And Great Britain, ... Determination Of Questions Between The Two. Arkose Press, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration. Fur Seal Arbitration: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris, Under the Treaty Between the United States ... and Great Britain, ... Determination of Questions Between the Two. Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration. Fur Seal Arbitration: Proceedings Of The Tribunal Of Arbitration, Convened At Paris Under The Treaty Between The United States Of America And Great ... Determination Of Questions Between The Two. Arkose Press, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Michael J, Moser, and Bao Chiann. A Guide to the HKIAC Arbitration Rules. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198712251.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This book provides a detailed commentary on the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) Administered Arbitration Rules providing practitioners with an insider’s perspective on how the HKIAC Secretariat administers arbitrations under these rules. HKIAC is one of the world’s most sophisticated arbitration institutions, which established a set of Administered Arbitration Rules in 2008. Since then, HKIAC has enjoyed a continued yearly growth in cases. In 2015, HKIAC saw a record number of arbitration cases in 2012. This guide makes reference to the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance as well as drawing comparisons with other institutional rules and the UNCITRAL Model Rules to emphasize key issues to consider when drafting an arbitral clause or strategizing over the conduct of an arbitration. As well as offering an insider’s perspective it provides examples of anonymous cases handled at the HKIAC, and a discussion on various issues arising from arbitrations involving mainland parties or enforcing arbitration awards in mainland China. The book not only draws from seven years’ experience administering arbitrations under the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules (2008) but highlights the various changes made in the revised Rules that came into effect in November 2013 benefiting from privileged access. The book begins with an introduction to the HKIAC, including a history with statistics and details of other services provided by the HKIAC itself. The commentary then goes on to examine each article in depth. Relevant supporting documents are appended including Recommended HKIAC Arbitration Clauses, HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules (2013), UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2010, and the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Britain, Great, Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration, and United States. Fur-seal Arbitration ...: Before The Tribunal Of Arbitration To Convene At Paris Under The Provisions Of The Treaty Between The United States Of America And Great Britain, Concluded February 29, 1892. Arkose Press, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Kaj, Hobér, and Eliasson Nils. Part VI The Post-Award Phase, 28 Review of non-ICSID Awards by National Courts. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198758082.003.0028.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In investment arbitration, just as in private commercial, the final award is often merely the starting shot for challenge and/or enforcement proceedings that may take as long as, or even longer than, the prior proceedings. This chapter discusses the challenge and review of investment treaty awards in municipal courts, based on 38 cases from 12 different jurisdictions: Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, England, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, Singapore, and the United States. Most Canadian and US cases challenge NAFTA awards, whereas most European cases challenge bilateral investment treaty awards. The remaining cases challenge awards under the Energy Charter Treaty, one challenge of a decision on jurisdiction under the Kyrgyz Foreign Investment Law, and two challenges of awards under the CIS Convention for the Protection of Investors Rights. These jurisdictions are frequently chosen as the seat of non-ICSID arbitrations.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

John, Choong. 9 The Conduct of Proceedings: (SIAC RULES 19 TO 26). Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198810650.003.0009.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter addresses the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) Rules governing the conduct of proceedings in a SIAC arbitration. It begins by enumerating the general principles (Rule 19) in Part A, followed by specific rules governing: the parties' written submissions (Rule 20) in Part B; the choice of seat (Rule 21) and language (Rule 22) in parts C and D, respectively; the parties' representatives (Rule 23) in Part E; the conduct of hearings (Rule 34) in Part F; witness evidence (Rule 25) in Part G; and the use of tribunal-appointed experts (Rule 26) in Part H. Notably, while the SIAC Rules leave considerable scope for the parties to determine how their arbitration should be conducted, the SIAC Rules (and in particular Rules 19.1, 20.1, and 25.3) have been amended in recent years to make clear that the tribunal has full authority to conduct the arbitration as it considers appropriate.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration. Fur Seal Arbitration: Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, Convened at Paris, under the Treaty Between the United States ... and Great Britain, Concluded at Washington, February 29, 1892, for the Determination of Questions Between the Two. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2018.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Joongi, Kim. 4 The Arbitral Tribunal. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198755432.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter discusses Korean arbitral tribunals. Korean courts have been strict in applying the provisions in the Arbitration Act regarding these. The courts have not hesitated to set aside awards when they have found that the parties have not complied with provisions concerning tribunal requirements or where tribunals have had conflicts of interest. Under the new 2016 Arbitration Act, furthermore, when the parties fail to appoint an arbitrator or reach agreement on a sole arbitrator or the chair, the court can now designate an institution such as the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB) to appoint the arbitrator. The KCAB has accumulated considerable experience and has greater institutional knowledge than the courts concerning the expertise of potential arbitrators, particularly international ones. With these developments in mind, the chapter reviews some formative cases which have shaped these tribunals in their current incarnation.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

Loukas, Mistelis. Part III Where to Arbitrate? Distinctive Features of Maritime Arbitral Seats, 8 Competition of Arbitral Seats in Attracting International Maritime Arbitration Disputes. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198757948.003.0008.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter examines the competition among arbitral seats in attracting maritime disputes. It first explores why certain seats are selected as a matter of general arbitration law and practice. It then discusses some key arbitral seats for the settlement of maritime disputes. It shows that there is a large concentration of cases in certain centres, where a number of well-known arbitral associations are established and the local courts and local laws are prepared to support the process. Although the key maritime arbitration centres do not necessarily coincide with the main commercial arbitration centres (with the exception of London, New York, and Singapore), the criteria for selection of key seats in maritime arbitration appear to be the same those used in commercial arbitration. The high number of maritime arbitration cases in the main maritime arbitration seats has also contributed to the development of arbitration law and jurisprudence in these jurisdictions.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

John J, Barceló. Part III International Arbitration Agreements: Issues and Perspectives, 7 Arbitrability Decisions Before, During, and After Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0008.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The arbitration agreement is the cornerstone of international commercial arbitration. Disputes over the agreement’s existence, validity, and scope-the essential elements for a controversy to be arbitrable-arise at each of the three fundamental stages of the arbitration/litigation process. This chapter discusses the arbitrability issue at each stage of the arbitration/litigation process. Stage One, before a national court where one party seeks to litigate the merits of the dispute and the other party petitions to have the dispute sent to arbitration. Stage Two, when the parties are before the arbitrable tribunal itself. Stage Three, when the party who wins an award asks a national court to enforce it, or the party who loses asks a national court to set it aside or refuse to recognize and enforce it.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Alex, Mills. Part X Judicial Review, Judicial Performance, and Enforcement, 31 The Principled English Ambivalence to Law and Dispute Resolution Beyond the State. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0032.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter examines what appears to be an ambivalence in English law towards non-state forms of law and dispute resolution. It begins by focusing on the fact that an English court will not recognize the validity of a choice of non-state law in a contract, but will nevertheless recognize and enforce an arbitral award based on the application of non-state law, identically chosen by the parties. It then deals with the English courts’ attitude to the recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award which has been set aside by the courts of the seat of the arbitration, under which the arbitral award is neither voided, nor necessarily still enforceable. In both of the contexts examined in this chapter-the question of the validity of a choice of non-state law, and the question of the enforceability of an arbitral award set aside by the courts of the arbitral seat-the underlying issue is the extent to which English law and courts are receptive to non-state norms and normative processes, and the extent to which they remain in a paradigm under which states are the exclusive sovereign actors. In both contexts, the English legal system strikes a balance.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Setoff In Arbitration And Commercial Transactions. Oxford University Press, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

David, Scorey, Geddes Richard, and Harris Chris. Part III Dispute Resolution Under the Bermuda Form, 19 Pre-Hearing Activities. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198754404.003.0019.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter addresses a range of practical and legal matters relating to the conduct of a Bermuda Form arbitration up to and including the disclosure of documents, i.e. before the service of witness statements in the normal case. This timing distinction is an arbitrary but practical one, since there are sometimes issues on the disclosure of documents that continue after service of witness statements. The chapter addresses the authority of the arbitrators to establish rules and procedures; the fact that there are no pre-set procedures in ad hoc arbitrations under the English Arbitration Act 1996; and how in practice an arbitration in London can be expected to progress. It discusses points such as security for costs, the nature and content of the pleadings, other techniques used in litigation to identify the issues, problems that commonly arise on the disclosure of documents, and the thorny issue of privilege.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Frédéric Gilles, Sourgens, Duggal Kabir, and Laird Ian A. Part I Introduction, 1 Situating Evidence in the Process of Investor-State Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198753506.003.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter submits that investor-state arbitration faces a common core set of problems that tribunals hearing these claims must resolve. Commentators of, and participants in, investor-state arbitration typically submit that there is only one rule of evidence: the free appreciation of evidence by the arbitrator. Given the ubiquity of the sentiment that there are no rules of evidence in investor-state arbitration, this chapter first attempts to examine where this perceived wisdom has gone wrong. This premise starts from a foundational coincidence of the who, what, how, and why of the decision-making process involving states and foreign investors. The coincidence explains why principles could form in the first place, given the role of the process participants, the subject matter of the process, and the operations of the process, as well as its constitutive values.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

48

Leng Sun, Chan. Part III Where to Arbitrate? Distinctive Features of Maritime Arbitral Seats, 12 Common Types of Shipping Arbitration: In Singapore and London. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198757948.003.0012.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter reflects on developments in maritime arbitration in Singapore, highlighting its distinctive features via a comparison with London, the shipping world’s preferred arbitration centre. In Singapore, the Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 2002 Rev Ed) governs domestic arbitration whereas the International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A, 2002 Rev Ed) (the ‘IAA’) governs international arbitration. The IAA gives the force of law to the UNCITRAL Model Law 1985 and the New York Convention on the Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Singapore offers the possibility to arbitrate under the institutional rules of either the Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration (SCMA) or the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC). The SIAC provides institutional services, including the appointment of arbitrators. The SCMA was in recent years taken outside the structure of the SIAC to provide a service more comparable to that provided by the London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA).

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Michael, Moser, and Bao Chiann. 8 Emergency Relief and Interim Measures of Protection (Articles 23 and 24, Schedule 4). Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198712251.003.0008.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter discusses measures of interim relief. The general purpose of interim measures is to prevent or minimize any disadvantage to a party which may occur before the final resolution of the dispute and enforcement of an arbitral award. A party to an HKIAC arbitration may apply for a wide range of interim relief from different authorities depending on the stage of the proceedings. The Arbitration Ordinance and the HKIAC Rules have both adopted the definition of interim measures set out by Article 17(2) of the UNCITRAL Model Law, which the chapter discusses in more detail. In addition, it also discusses interim relief from an emergency arbitrator, interim relief from an arbitral tribunal, interim relief from a court, and security for costs.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Setoff Defences In International Commercial Arbitration A Comparative Analysis. Hart Publishing (UK), 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Книги з теми "Arbitration Seat"

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями