Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Arbitration principle / Книги

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Arbitration principle.

Книги з теми "Arbitration principle"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 11 березня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 книг для дослідження на тему "Arbitration principle".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте книги для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Mwenda, Kenneth Kaoma. Principles of arbitration law. Parkland, Fla: Brown Walker Press, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Parris, John. Arbitration: Principles and practice. London: Collins, 1985.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Laurence, Shore, and Weiniger Matthew, eds. International investment arbitration: Substantive principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Campbell, McLachlan. International investment arbitration: Substantive principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Broida, Peter B. Principles of federal sector arbitration law. Arlington, Virginia: Dewey Publications Inc., 2013.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Broida, Peter B. Principles of federal sector arbitration law. 2nd ed. Arlington, Va: Dewey Publications, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

University of Reading. College of Estate Management. and Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors., eds. Principles of arbitration: A CPD study pack. Reading: College of EstateManagement, 1992.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

The principles and practice of international commercial arbitration. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Broida, Peter B. A guide to principles of federal sector arbitration. Arlington, Va: Dewey Publications, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Hobér, Kaj. Cross-examination in international arbitration: Nine basic principles. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

The principles and practice of international commercial arbitration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Broida, Peter B. A guide to principles of federal sector arbitration. Arlington, Va: Dewey Publications, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

M, Davis Natania, ed. A guide to principles of federal sector arbitration. Arlington, Va: Dewey Publications, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Coe, Jack J. International commercial arbitration: American principles and practice in a global context. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y: Transnational Publishers, 1997.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Compensation and restitution in investor-state arbitration: Principles and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Barrantes, Sergio Artavia. El proceso arbitral en Costa Rica: Confrontación con los principales instrumentos internacionales y el derecho comparado. Costa Rica: Editorial Juridica Dupa, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Transportation, Ontario Ministry of, ed. Principles of employee relations in the OPS: A review of employee relations principles derived from OPS arbitration decisions. [Downsview, Ont.]: Employee Relations Office, Human Resources Branch, Ministry of Transportation, 1993.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Les principes généraux de la Lex mercatoria: Contribution à l'étude d'un ordre juridique anational. Paris: Libr. générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1992.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Koul, Autar Krishan. Law of arbitration: Leading cases, 1970-1987, with complete annotation and reference to illustrate sections and principles of law. Delhi: Arbitration Law Reporter, 1987.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Fabio, López Blanco Hernán, and Alvarez Niño Olga Lucía, eds. La jurisprudencia arbitral en Colombia: Análisis de los principales laudos, en materia de derecho privado. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

H, Wiggers Willem J., ed. International commercial law: Source materials : corporate governance codes, international contract principles, all major arbitration and mediation rules, conventions on applicable law, on jurisdiction and enforcement, guidance for ongoing disclosures, ethical conduct, assessment of credit rating agencies, the position of auditors, UCP600 and INCOTERMS 2000. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Chendo, I. G. Arbitration: Principles and practice under the standard form of building contract in Nigeria for architects, quantity surveyors, and contractors. Onitsha: Hybrid Publishers, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Girdhari, Lal. Domestic enquiries into charges against employees and workmen: Principles and procedures. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Pyramid Publications, 1992.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Brunner, Christoph. Force majeure and hardship under general contract principles: Exemption for non-performance in international arbitration. Austin: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Force majeure and hardship under general contract principles: Exemption for non-performance in international arbitration. Austin: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

1953-, Brubaker John K., ed. NASD arbitration solution: Five black belt principles to protect and grow your financial services practice. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Ahmed, El Far. Abuse of Rights in International Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198850380.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In recent years, international arbitration has become plagued by different forms of substantive and procedural abuse. For example, we have witnessed a rise in cases where parties restructure their investments in an abusive manner by altering one of its features purely to gain access to ICSID arbitration. Similarly, the increasingly common practice of initiating parallel arbitral proceedings in order to maximise a party’s chances of success, and the possibility of inconsistent decisions pose a risk to standards of fairness. Abusive practices designed by parties to prejudice their opponents may undermine the fair resolution of disputes and frustrate the administration of arbitral justice. There are pre-existing tools and legal rules that can be utilised to prevent abuse. However, these tools are inherently rigid in their application and fail to remedy all forms of abuse. Abuse of Rights in International Arbitration introduces the principle of abuse of rights and considers its application as a general principle of law to prevent different forms of substantive and procedural abuse in international arbitration. The virtue of a single theory with a wide scope and an overarching premise is that it is a principle, which involves equity considerations, enjoys the flexibility of general principles of law, and can address different abusive behaviours. The author carefully examines the legal basis and core elements of abuse of rights and analyses the relevant case law to address how the principle may affect administration of arbitral justice. Arguing for the application of abuse of rights as a general principle of law, the author expertly examines how it could apply in both international commercial and investment arbitration to tackle procedural misconduct and different abusive practices.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Gabrielle, Kaufmann-Kohler, and Rigozzi Antonio. 3 The Arbitration Agreement. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199679751.003.0003.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter discusses the notion, content, and effects of the arbitration agreement, defined as an agreement to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes that have arisen or may arise between the parties in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not, which may be in the form of a clause in a contract or of a separate ‘submission agreement’ (compromis arbitral). The chapter examines the principle of separability and the requirements for the validity of the arbitration agreement, namely arbitrability, written form, and substantive validity, including the agreement’s formation, interpretation, extension to third parties, and termination. Finally, it discusses to what extent defects of the arbitration agreement can be remedied by conduct.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Borzu, Sabahi. Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601189.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This book presents a detailed study on compensation and restitution in investor state arbitration pursuant to investment treaties. The study begins by examining the historical roots of the principles of reparation, restitution, and compensation in international law as reflected in the landmark Chorzów Factory case. The roots of these principles are traced to Roman law and private law concepts that entered into the European continent's legal systems. Moving to modern times, the study focuses on the principle of reparation set out in the Chorzów Factory case and its requirement that reparation put the aggrieved party in the ‘hypothetical position’ that would have existed if not for the wrongful act. Restitution, both material and judicial, is discussed as a form of reparation. Compensation, by far the more common form of reparation in modern international investment disputes, is discussed in detail. In dealing with compensation for expropriation, this book examines the recent trends in which lawful and unlawful expropriation cases are distinguished and the impact that this distinction can have on the amount of compensation. This book additionally outlines some of the main valuation and accounting methods used in setting the hypothetical position to measure compensation due. Various forms of supplemental compensation, such as moral damages, interest, or arbitration costs, may also be necessary to fully restore the hypothetical position; these are discussed along with applicable limitations. This study also sets out important principles that may limit compensation generally, such as causation and the prohibition on double counting.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Jianlong, Yu, and Cao Lijun. A Guide to the CIETAC Arbitration Rules. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199671717.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (‘CIETAC’) is the largest permanent arbitration centre in the world, with a fast-growing case load and rising international profile. This commentary on the CIETAC 2012 Arbitration Rules provides guidance on the rules, alongside practical and procedural recommendations from practitioners of unparalleled experience. The commentary is a rule-by-rule examination of the inception, interpretation and application of the new rules, which makes comparative reference to the rules of other institutions and considers all relevant case law and legislation. It groups the rules thematically according to the principle areas of practitioner interest, including chapters on: Jurisdiction and the Arbitration Agreement; Commencing the Arbitration; Formation and Challenges to the Arbitral Tribunal; Conduct of Proceedings; Awards; Summary Procedure; and Costs. The book chapters deal with the practical aspects of arbitrating in China, ensuring the book is a comprehensive reference work for practitioners in the field.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Frédéric Gilles, Sourgens, Duggal Kabir, and Laird Ian A. Part II Burden and Standard of Proof in International Investment Arbitration, 2 Burden of Proof in Investor-State Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198753506.003.0002.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter discusses the concept of the burden of proof in investor-state arbitration. The basic rule regarding the burden of proof in international law is that the party who makes an assertion must prove it. The rule has its origins in the traditions of Roman, common, and civil law countries, and is not new or unique to investment arbitration. In fact, this principle has been widely recognized by several international dispute settlement panels, as well as other international agencies. Not every set of arbitration rules explicitly includes this rule, however, although there is near unanimity by tribunals and commentators in its application.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

International Investment Law: Reconciling Policy and Principle. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2020.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

International Investment Law: Reconciling Policy and Principle. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

International Investment Law: Reconciling Policy and Principle. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Principle of Systemic Integration in International Investment Law and Arbitration. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2015.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Marie, Berard. Part IX Costs, Funding, and Ideas for Optimization, 27 ‘Other Costs’ in International Arbitration: A Review of the Recoverability of Internal and Third-Party Funding Costs. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0028.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter explores the types of costs that may be awarded in arbitral proceedings, analysing the underlying principles governing the recoverability of costs in international arbitration. In particular, it focuses on how claims relating to the costs of in-house legal counsel; staff and senior management; and third-party funding arrangements are generally decided by arbitral tribunals. While most arbitral rules expressly allow for the recovery of arbitral costs and reasonable legal fees incurred by external counsel, the position is less clear where the fees of in-house lawyers, lost management time, or third-party funding arrangements are concerned. In theory, in-house counsel fees should be recoverable where parties are able to demonstrate the reasonableness and necessity of these costs. As for management costs, a party should in principle be able to recover such costs in arbitration if it can prove that the time spent on the arbitration caused substantial disruption to its business. Costs underwritten by a third-party funding arrangement should, in principle, be similarly recoverable provided the funding arrangement was agreed at arm’s length and is permitted under the applicable laws.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

David J, Sandy. Part XI Public Policy and Abuse of Process, 33 The Role of Abuse of Process in Protecting the Integrity of Arbitration Awards. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0034.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Although arbitration awards are final and binding, losing parties may sometimes commence a second set of proceedings on slightly different grounds from the first in an attempt to raise doubt over the status and enforceability of the first award and/or to delay enforcement. In England, the doctrine of abuse of process has been utilized to prevent a second action being pursued. The English courts have developed the principle to prevent collateral attacks on prior judgments and, now, arbitral awards and by so doing, ensure the finality of judgments and awards. This chapter outlines the reasoning behind these decisions and asks whether there is a basis upon which such powers should be available in arbitration more generally, whatever the seat, rules, procedural or governing law. Should the principle of abuse of process, in so far as it prevents a collateral attack on a prior arbitration award, be a power which is generally available to tribunals? If so, what is the source of that power and how should it be exercised? Will arbitration benefit from the recognition of this principle? The chapter suggests that, in most cases, the source of the principle of abuse of process can be more readily found in the parties’ private agreement rather than having to be located in the public policy of any system of law which might be applicable.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Frédéric Gilles, Sourgens, Duggal Kabir, and Laird Ian A. Part III Presumptions and Inferences, 7 Iura Novit Curia and Proof of Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198753506.003.0007.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter examines one of the most underestimated areas of proof in investor-state arbitration—the proof of law. The first evidentiary principle governing proof of law is the maxim of iura novit curia, or the tribunal or court knows the law. The principle is fraught with difficulty when applied to investor-state arbitration. The practice of investor-state arbitration on its face disproves the assumption that tribunals know the law in a non-trivial sense. This difficulty does not mean, however, that iura novit curia is wholly inapplicable to investor-state arbitration. Rather, as the chapter shows, the principle must be carefully circumscribed in order to avoid potential annullable error.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Frédéric Gilles, Sourgens, Duggal Kabir, and Laird Ian A. Part II Burden and Standard of Proof in International Investment Arbitration, 3 Shifting the Burden of Evidence. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198753506.003.0003.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter explains the process of ‘shifting the burden of evidence’, otherwise known as the ‘shifting principle’. This is the proposition which occurs when the party who bears the initial burden puts forward evidence to support its initial claim. Here, the burden of evidence (or alternatively also termed as the ‘burden of production’, ‘burden of persuasion’, or ‘burden of proceeding’) shifts to the other party to rebut the evidence put forward. Shifting the burden of evidence is to be read in conjunction with the burden of proof principle discussed in the previous chapter. This is because it is only when the initial burden of the party making an allegation is met that the burden is shifted to the other party.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Yas, Banifatemi. Part IV Guide to Key Substantive Issues, 19 The Law Applicable in Investment Treaty Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198758082.003.0019.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Investment treaty arbitration, being an arbitral process, in no way differs from international commercial arbitration in that the principle of party autonomy is the primary rule governing the arbitration, including as regards the law applicable to the substance of the dispute. When the applicable law has been chosen by the parties, the arbitrators have a duty to apply such law and nothing but such law. It is only in the absence of a choice by the parties that the arbitrators are entitled to exercise a degree of discretion in the determination of the applicable law. This chapter examines each of these situations in turn, before considering whether the specific nature of investment protection treaties has implications in terms of choice of law process.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Bernard, Rix. Part IV The Role of Arbitrators in the Development of Shipping Law, 18 The Contribution of Arbitration to the Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198757948.003.0018.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter reflects on the overall role of a maritime arbitrator. It emphasizes that the process of arbitrator selection tends to focus on their knowledge, experience, and expertise. They also have the duty to reason their awards—a duty owed not just to the losing party but perhaps more widely if one wishes to speak of a genuine transnational maritime law. The corollary of this is the need for transparency to ensure their accountability. While this might seem to conflict with the principle of confidentiality, this is probably because this principle is misunderstood: hearings should continue to be held in private to protect the confidentiality of evidence, however it does not necessarily follow that awards (appropriately anonymized) should be kept confidential ‘for all time’. As for the autonomy of the lex maritima itself, the chapter argues that one must not ignore its intimate and mutually enriching relationship with national laws.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

Principles of Arbitration Law. West Publishing Company, College & School Division, 2017.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

Principles of Arbitration Law. West Academic, 2023.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Shore, Laurence, Loukas Mistelis, Campbell McLachlan QC, and Matthew Weiniger. International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (Oxford International Arbitration). Oxford University Press, USA, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Stavros, Brekoulakis. Part XI Public Policy and Abuse of Process, 32 Public Policy Rules in English Arbitration Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0033.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter argues that the doctrine of public policy currently adopted by legal discourse in arbitration is conceptually and methodologically confusing, and outdated. It is conceptually confusing because there is usually no explanation about how the content of public policy is ascertained or whether the doctrine functions as a legal principle or a set of legal rules. The doctrine of public policy, as a structured set of legal rules, can be better conceived of as a doctrine of national law. The rules of public policy can also be ascertained from a careful analysis of the historical context and jurisprudential development of the doctrine. The chapter first looks into the concept and function of public policy in English law and jurisprudence. It then focuses on the role of public policy in English private international law, before finally ascertaining the rules of public policy in English arbitration law.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

Shore, Laurence, Campbell McLachlan, and Matthew Weiniger. International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles. Oxford University Press, 2017.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Shore, Laurence, Campbell McLachlan, and Matthew Weiniger. International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles. Oxford University Press, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

48

Greg, Fullelove. Part VIII Arbitrators’ Decision-Making Power and Arbitral Tribunals’ Cessation of Functions, 24 Functus Officio? Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0025.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter examines the meaning of the principle of functus officio. The expression is used to refer to the point when the arbitral tribunal has discharged its duty in full and can no longer act. This point is generally held to be when the tribunal has concluded all matters with which it has jurisdiction to deal pursuant to a particular arbitration agreement. But while the principle itself may be superficially straightforward, its scope and application in certain cases have raised issues. The chapter asks: When can the tribunal be sure that its mandate is complete, i.e. officio functus est? When, if ever, can the arbitrators definitively say that they are ‘free’ of their duties in an arbitration? It suggests that it would be wrong to believe that a tribunal has certainly finished its work when it sends the final award to the parties. In many jurisdictions and under the leading arbitration rules, there will still be a continuing but reduced mandate to correct, interpret, and/or revise the award and perhaps to issue additional awards.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Principles of International Litigation and Arbitration. West Academic, 2019.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Broida. Principles of Federal Sector Arbitration Law. DEWEY PUBLICATION, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!