Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Anti-circumvention"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Anti-circumvention".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Anti-circumvention"
ZHOU, WEIHUAN. "Circumvention and Anti-Circumvention: Rising Protectionism in Australia." World Trade Review 15, no. 3 (January 14, 2016): 495–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1474745615000762.
Повний текст джерелаBurk, D. L. "Anti-circumvention misuse." IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 22, no. 2 (2003): 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mtas.2003.1216242.
Повний текст джерелаCornelis, Joris. "Anti-Circumvention: A Comparison." Global Trade and Customs Journal 11, Issue 11/12 (December 1, 2016): 542–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2016070.
Повний текст джерелаUruchurtu, Gustavo A. "Anti-Circumvention of Anti-Dumping Measures: Mexico." Global Trade and Customs Journal 11, Issue 11/12 (December 1, 2016): 515–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2016066.
Повний текст джерелаSud, Juhi Dion. "Circumvention of Anti-Dumping Measures: Law and Practice of India." Global Trade and Customs Journal 11, Issue 11/12 (December 1, 2016): 508–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2016065.
Повний текст джерелаBaskin, Serdar. "Circumvention of Anti-Dumping Measures: Law and Practice of Turkey." Global Trade and Customs Journal 11, Issue 11/12 (December 1, 2016): 528–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2016068.
Повний текст джерелаYano, Hiromi, Jesse Kreier, and Seref Coskun. "Anti-Circumvention in the Multilateral System: Plus ça Change." Global Trade and Customs Journal 11, Issue 11/12 (December 1, 2016): 461–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2016060.
Повний текст джерелаHammond, Herbert J., Heather C. Brunelli, Jocelyn E. Dabeau, Luke A. Walker, and Thomas Yoo. "The Anti-Circumvention Provision of The Digital Millennium Copyright Act." Texas Wesleyan Law Review 8, no. 3 (July 2002): 593–613. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/twlr.v8.i3.9.
Повний текст джерелаAlhayat, Aditya Paramita. "KETIDAKEFEKTIFAN KEBIJAKAN ANTI-DUMPING PRODUK IMPOR BAJA INDONESIA: SEBUAH ANALISIS AWAL." Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan 11, no. 2 (December 31, 2017): 143–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v11i2.230.
Повний текст джерелаYu, Yanning. "Circumvention and Anti-circumvention in Anti-dumping Practice: A New Problem in China’s Outbound Trade." Journal of World Trade 41, Issue 5 (October 1, 2007): 1015–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/trad2007039.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Anti-circumvention"
Latter, Gareth Paul. "Copyright law in the digital environment: DRM systems, anti-circumvention, legislation and user rights." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003196.
Повний текст джерелаHollis, Richard. "An Impotent Aegis: An economic analysis of the effectiveness of Australia’s anti-circumvention laws." Thesis, Discipline of Business Law, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/2253.
Повний текст джерелаDiscipline of Business Law
Garcia, Natanya. "Anti-circumvention technology legislation in Canada : drafting a new law in the wake of the DMCA." Thesis, McGill University, 2003. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=19625.
Повний текст джерелаBastabak, Burcu. "A Data Mining Framework To Detect Tariff Code Circumvention In Turkish Customs Database." Master's thesis, METU, 2012. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12614616/index.pdf.
Повний текст джерелаTariff Code Circumvention"
. To identify such misdeclarations, a physical examination of the merchandise is required. However, with limited personnel resources, the physical examination of all imported merchandise is not possible. In this study, a data mining framework is developed on Turkish customs database in order to detect &ldquo
Tariff Code Circumvention&rdquo
. For this purpose, four types of products, which are the most circumvented goods in the Turkish customs, have been chosen. First, with the help of Risk Analysis Office, the significant features are identified. Then, Infogain algorithm is used for ranking these features. Finally, KNN algorithm is applied on the Turkish customs database in order to identify the circumvented goods automatically. The results show that the framework is able to find such circumvented goods successfully.
LIN, YUN-HAN, and 林筠涵. "New Development of Anti-circumvention Provisions." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/syxh7m.
Повний текст джерела輔仁大學
財經法律學系碩士班
107
The rapid development and advancement of digital technology enables the public to more easily access or use a large number of works, and protecting the works by technology to avoid it from unauthorized access or use of “Technological Protection Measure” (TPM) is beginning to prevail. In order to prevent the protection of the technology from being decrypted or descrambled , the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) had adopted two international treaties, requiring countries to enact legislation on TPM. The United States enacted the “Anti-circumvention Provisions ” in the “Digital Millennium Copyright Act” (DMCA) in 1998 is the main reference regulation of each country. In 2004, Taiwan,our country also enacted the rules against circumventing technological protection measures. However, the application of TPM sometimes imposes excessive restrictions on the use and development of works. Therefore, in order to balance the interests between owner of copyrights and users, the US anti-circumvention provisions have exceptions that do not apply anti-circumvention provisions, and by 2018,the seventh “Exemptions” to reviewed every three years had been announced. Nevertheless, with the exceptions mentioned above, the application of anti-circumvention provisions continues to derive problems, such as competition and compatibility with industry, abuse of copyright, fair use, freedom of speech, and the rise of consumer and environmental awareness in recent years. Consumers’ “Self-repairment awareness” advocates that technological protection measures should not limit their repairment behavior for products. Therefore, in addition to bring this awareness in exemptions in the United States, the states also discussed the relevant legislation on “Right to Repair Act”. This article will use the copyright TPM as a starting point to discuss the US anti-circumvention provisions and EU directives related to TPM. Additionally, it will introduce the contents of the “Exemptions” with the US anti-circumvention provisions , and analyz cases of past disputes restricted by anti-circumvention provisions. In the end , it will talk about the development and legislative content regarding technological protection measures in Taiwan, and compare it with the US anti-circumvention provisions to discuss the existing problems and propose improvements and suggestions of TMP regulations in Taiwan.
Tsai, Ren-jie, and 蔡仁傑. "A Legal Study on Interoperability Issues in Anti-Circumvention Provision." Thesis, 2008. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/98ewb7.
Повний текст джерелаWu, Chun-chih, and 吳俊幟. "Technological Protecting Measures and Anti- circumvention Provisions: Comments on the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act." Thesis, 2004. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/pe8m38.
Повний текст джерела國立清華大學
科技法律研究所
92
Recently, copyright owners had tried implementing various technological protecting measures to prevent their works from reproducing and distributing among the digital network without their authorization. But these technology protecting measures could hardly protect their works due to user’s circumvention. Therefore, many countries have begun their anti-circumvention provision to protect copyright infringement further, and the United States had taken the lead. Section 1201 of The “Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998” (DMCA) strictly prohibits others from circumventing technological protecting measures to access the copyrighted works, and from helping such circumvention to access or duplicate the copyrighted works. But criticisms argue that such strict prohibitions will adversely affect public interests and will ultimately damage the spirit of copyright law – to promote the progress of science and useful arts. Since recently our administrative department have started drafting DMCA-like anti-circumvention provision, it’s important to realize it’s critical impact on public interests. This thesis will introduce the anti-circumvention provision of DMCA and some crucial rulings of U.S. courts in detail. Through such introduction and my personal point of view, this thesis summarize some adverse impact of the anti-circumvention provision of DMCA. In order to achieve the goal of the copyright law, our anti-circumvention legislation should avoid overprotecting copyright owners at the expense of public access and use of the information.
Lin, Kang-Ping, and 林康平. "Evolution and Trend of Development on the Anit-circumvention Regulation of Anti-dumping Law of European Community." Thesis, 2007. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/46131384485458041645.
Повний текст джерелаChen, Guan-Ting, and 陳冠廷. "The Reflection on the Anti-Circumvention Provision of Technological Protection Measures-From the 2014 Amendments of Copyright Act of Taiwan." Thesis, 2015. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/74mt6n.
Повний текст джерела逢甲大學
財經法律研究所
103
In our ever growing world of technology, digitization had a profound impact on the creation, reproduction, and dissemination of works protected by copyright. Works in digital format are vulnerable to infringement, and technological protection measures are accordingly applied as protection. Technological protection measures can, however, easily be circumvented, and additional legal protection against circumvention was needed. Anti-circumvention provisions bans the circumvention of a technological protection measure without authority. However, technological measure do not distinguish between uses which are not authorized by the copyright owner but are permitted by law, on the one hand, and those uses which are not authorized by the owner and also infringing. For example, the same copy-control mechanism, which prevents a person from making infringing copies of a copyright work, may also prevent a student from making legitimate fair use copies. This essay will focus on the balance between the rights of authors to protect their interests through technical means and those of users to circumvent such measures for legitimate, non-infringing purposes. United States for instance, in 1998 the Congress passed “The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)” to establish anti-circumvention provisions. In Taiwan add provisions regarding technological protection measures as Article 80-2 in copyright law in 2004. Both the U.S. and German systems prohibit the circumvention of, and the trafficking in, access control devices, the United States regime does not prohibit the circumvention of copy control devices. Consequently, U.S. users who can circumvent a copy control device without trafficking in such devices may make fair use of the copyrighted material. The German system does not permit the circumvention of copy control devices in any respect, but it does require the copyright holder to provide the user, in exchange for compensation, with the means to bypass the copy control devices and make fair use of the copyrighted material. In Taiwan, in order to guarantee the anti-circumvention provisions would not lead to the narrowing of fair use, the Amendment of Copyright Act was passed on January 23, 2014. Fair use doctrine can be an exception from anti-circumvention provisions. Thus, everyone can circumvent a copy control device without permission, resulting in the legislation on anti-circumvention provisions has become “meaningless”. After the collection of materials has been completed about U.S.A., German and Taiwan, analysis has been made about the advantages. This essay recommends that we should reference the German legislation which expands the degree to which copyrighted material is made more accessible for fair use.
Книги з теми "Anti-circumvention"
Yu, Yanning. Circumvention and anti-circumvention measures: The impact on anti-dumping practice in international trade. Austin, [Tex.?]: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2008.
Знайти повний текст джерелаFan gui bi fa lü zhi du yan jiu: Study on the anti-circumvention legal system. Beijing Shi: Zhongguo zheng fa da xue chu ban she, 2013.
Знайти повний текст джерелаCIRCUMVENTION AND ANTI-CIRCUMVENTION MEASURES: The Impact on Anti-dumping Practice. Kluwer Law Intl, 2007.
Знайти повний текст джерелаShemtov, Noam. Licence-Created Monopolies. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198716792.003.0001.
Повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Anti-circumvention"
Schneck, Paul. "Restricting Anti-Circumvention Devices." In Cybercrimes: A Multidisciplinary Analysis, 73–94. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13547-7_4.
Повний текст джерелаSamuelson, Pamela. "Towards More Sensible Anti-circumvention Regulations." In Financial Cryptography, 33–41. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45472-1_3.
Повний текст джерелаHua, Jerry Jie. "Toward a More Balanced Model: Revision of Anti-circumvention Rules." In Toward A More Balanced Approach: Rethinking and Readjusting Copyright Systems in the Digital Network Era, 69–100. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43517-5_3.
Повний текст джерелаDusollier, Séverine. "Tipping the Scale in Favor of the Right Holders: The European Anti-Circumvention Provisions." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 462–78. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10941270_29.
Повний текст джерелаFitzgerald, Brian. "The Australian Sony PlayStation Case: How Far Will Anti-circumvention Law Reach in the Name of DRM?" In Digital Rights Management. Technologies, Issues, Challenges and Systems, 32–51. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11787952_3.
Повний текст джерелаPuccio, Laura. "20 Years After Marrakesh: Reconsidering the Effects of Preferential Rules of Origin and Anti-Circumvention Rules on Trade in Inputs and Global Production Networks." In European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2014, 173–200. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40913-4_8.
Повний текст джерелаТези доповідей конференцій з теми "Anti-circumvention"
Chan, Siu-yan. "Cracking the Cracks - An Economic and Legal Perspective to Circumvention and Anti-Circumvention." In 2009 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2009-Fall). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/vetecf.2009.5378879.
Повний текст джерелаŠokinjov, Stefan. "ODGOVORNOST TREĆIH LICA ZA KRŠENjE KARTELNE ZABRANE U PRAVU KONKURENCIJE EVROPSKE UNIJE." In XV Majsko savetovanje: Sloboda pružanja usluga i pravna sigurnost. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xvmajsko.791s.
Повний текст джерела