Добірка наукової літератури з теми "1926-1984 contributions in political science"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Зміст
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "1926-1984 contributions in political science".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "1926-1984 contributions in political science"
Święcicki, Łukasz. "Carl Schmitt w polskich interpretacjach politologicznych 1984–2007." Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem 41, no. 4 (January 28, 2020): 133–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/2300-7249.41.4.7.
Повний текст джерелаMorley, T. P. "Some Professional and Political Events in Canadian Neurosurgery." Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques 12, no. 3 (August 1985): 230–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100047077.
Повний текст джерелаStanbury, W. T. "The Mother's Milk of Politics: Political Contributions to Federal Parties in Canada, 1974–1984." Canadian Journal of Political Science 19, no. 4 (December 1986): 795–822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900055153.
Повний текст джерелаNeustadtl, Alan, Denise Scott, and Dan Clawson. "Class struggle in campaign finance? Political action committee contributions in the 1984 elections." Sociological Forum 6, no. 2 (June 1991): 219–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01114391.
Повний текст джерелаEagles, Munroe. "The Political Ecology of Campaign Contributions in Canada: A Constituency-Level Analysis." Canadian Journal of Political Science 25, no. 3 (September 1992): 535–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900021454.
Повний текст джерелаSPECTER, MATTHEW. "HABERMAS'S POLITICAL THOUGHT, 1984–1996: A HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION." Modern Intellectual History 6, no. 1 (April 2009): 91–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479244308001959.
Повний текст джерелаSchwebel, Stephen M. "Attainments of Eduardo Valencia-Ospina as Deputy Registrar and Registrar of the International Court of Justice." Leiden Journal of International Law 13, no. 2 (June 2000): 341–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156500000248.
Повний текст джерелаLIEBERFELD, DANIEL. "Evaluating the Contributions of Track-two Diplomacy to Conflict Termination in South Africa, 1984-90." Journal of Peace Research 39, no. 3 (May 2002): 355–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039003006.
Повний текст джерелаBox-Steffensmeier, J. M., and J. K. Dow. "Campaign Contributions in an Unregulated Setting: an Analysis of the 1984 and 1986 California Assembly Elections." Political Research Quarterly 45, no. 3 (September 1, 1992): 609–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299204500304.
Повний текст джерелаGunlicks, Arthur B. "Campaign and Party Finance in the West German “Party State”." Review of Politics 50, no. 1 (1988): 30–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500036123.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "1926-1984 contributions in political science"
Carter, Kelly A. "Foucault's Foundationless Democratic Theory." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2006. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5475/.
Повний текст джерелаSanches, Junior Carlos Alberto [UNESP]. "Genealogia e biopoder." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/88743.
Повний текст джерелаCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Os anos de 1974 a 1976 são marcados pela entrada, no vocabulário de Michel Foucault, dos neologismos biopoder e biopolítica. Estes termos despontam num momento decisivo de seu procedimento genealógico de análise: influenciado pelas leituras crítica de Nietzsche, ele passa a colocar em foco o processo multifacetado pelo qual, na modernidade, a dimensão biológica da vida humana entra nos cálculos de um poder que se exerce microcapilarmente. Esquadrinhado como “máquina” ou como “espécie”, o corpo do sujeito passa a ser o ponto que concentra os esforços das tecnologias e racionalidades governamentais. Este trabalho busca mapear os elementos metodológicos característicos que permitiram a formulação genealógica do problema da relação entre vida e poder. A fim de destacar a importância das teses e princípios analíticos foucauldianos para um diagnóstico crítico do presente, serão apresentadas considerações e notas a partir da leitura de Giorgio Agamben e Peter Sloterdijk
The years 1974 to 1976 are marked by the entry of neologisms biopower and biopolitics in the vocabulary of Michel Foucault. These terms emerges in a decisive moment in his genealogical analysis procedure: affected by critical readings of Nietzsche, he put into focus the multifaceted process by which, in modernity, the biological dimension of human life enters the calculations of a power that is exercised by microcapillary means. Scanned as “machine” or as “species”, the subject's body becomes the point that concentrates the efforts of governmental rationalities and technologies. This paper seeks to map some of the methodological elements that allow the genealogical formulation of the problem of the relation between life and power. In order to idicate the importance of Foucault’s theories and analytical principles for a critical diagnosis of actuallity, it shall present considerations and notes from the reading and analysis of works of Giorgio Agamben and Peter Sloterdijk
Sachikonye, Tawanda. "A Foucauldian critique of neo-liberalsim." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003038.
Повний текст джерелаAllsobrook, Christopher John. "Foucault, historicism and political philosophy." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003073.
Повний текст джерелаCastelfranchi, Juri 1969. "As serpentes e o bastão : tecnociencia, neoliberalismo e inexorabilidade." [s.n.], 2008. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/280500.
Повний текст джерелаTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-11T10:50:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Castelfranchi_Juri_D.pdf: 9602971 bytes, checksum: 13cac92fe760bc5a6961fb3cd0b2246c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008
Resumo: Neste trabalho são analisadas as práticas e o discurso da tecnociência contemporânea, definida não apenas como fusão entre ciência e tecnologia mas como acontecimento que funciona no interior de uma específica economia de poder e que é caracterizado pela interação e a retroalimentação mútua do capitalismo, da ciência e da tecnologia. São mapeados movimentos e rupturas no funcionamento da tecnociência, examinando a fonte dos financiamentos para a pesquisa, o ethos dos cientistas, as fomlas de apropriação do conhecimento e as políticas de C&T à luz dos conceitos foucaultianos de govemamentalidade e dispositivo. O discurso tecnocientífico atual é analisado a partir do monitoramento de documentos oficiais e declarações públicas de cientistas-empreendedores, policy-makers, ONGs etc. O cruzamento de tais elementos mostra que ciências, técnicas e capitalismo funcionam entrelaçados. Em alguns casos, impulsionando-se mutuamente: cada parte se apoia nos sucessos, na autoridade, nos efeitos de verdade e na potência das outras. Noutros casos, há dissonâncias e atritos. Os resultados da pesquisa indicam que a tecnociência atual é, ao mesmo tempo, piramidal e reticular, inexorável e modulável. De um lado, retrata si mesma como fundamentada num saber a-político, neutral, objetivo, universal, que "cai" na sociedade quando aplicado, divulgado, transformado em objeto técnico e em mercadoria. A tecnociência aparece como o bonde que não podemos perder, cuja marcha é automática e cuja regulação deve ser deixada com os especialistas. Por outro lado, no neoliberalismo a tecnociência precisa receber inúmerosfeedbacks, escutar as demandas do mercado e as preocupações do cidadão. Conclui se que a tecnociência atual é um dispositivo qe geometria variável modulado por parâmetros que nem sempre podem ser estabelecidos' nG, il1terior de uma tecnocracia. Funciona ativando mecanismos de despolitização e de inv.isibilização dos conflitos; e constitui-se como implacável politicamente através de repetidas performances voltadas para a mobilização da população e a afirmação de inevitabilidade. No entanto, sua configuração atual é um acontecimento apoiado em terrenos (epistêmicos, econômicos e sociais) movediços
Abstract: ln this work practices and discourse of contemporary technoscience are analyzed. Technoscience is defined not only as the merging between science and technology, but as an event, functioning inside a certain economy of power and characterized by the interaction and reciprocal feedback of capitalism, science and technology. Movements and ruptures in technoscience are mapped by means of the examination of the sources of funding for research, the ethos of scientists, the forms of appropriation of knowledge and S&T policies, using concepts by Michel Foucault, such as govemmentality and apparatus (dispositif). The contemporary technoscientific discourse is analyzed by monitoring official documents and public declarations by entrepreneurs-scientists, policy-makers, NGOs, etc. By crossing such elements, it is shown that sciences, techniques and capitalism function today inside an entanglement. ln some cases, they boost each other: every part is supported by the successes, the authority, the truth effects of the other ones. In other cases, dissonance and friction exist. The results of this research show that contemporary technoscience is, at the same time, pyramidal and reticular; it may seem inexorable, but it may also be modulated. Technoscience depicts itself as grounded on an a-political, neutral, objective, universal knowledge, "falling" down into society when applied, popularized and transformed in a technical object or a product. Its progress is told to be semi-automatic, and its regulation should be left with the experts. On the other side, in neoliberalism, technoscience needs also to receive feedback, to listen to the demands of the market and to the worries of the citizens. It can be concluded that contemporary technoscience is a dispositlf of.variable geometry, modulates by parameters that cannot be always established by a technocracy. It functions by acting mechanisms of depolitization and invisibilization of conflict; it constitutes itself as politically implacable by means of continuous performances of inevitability and mobilization of population. However, its configuration is an event grounded on shifting epistemic, economic and social lands
Doutorado
Sociologia da Cultura
Doutor em Sociologia
Sanna, Maria Eleonora. "Pratiques de Soi et Performance de Genre : la construction des sujets politiques entre Pouvoir et Autonomie. Une lecture croisée de Michel Foucault et Judith Butler." Phd thesis, Université Paris VIII Vincennes-Saint Denis, 2006. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00358609.
Повний текст джерелаDoron, Claude-Olivier. "Races et dégénérescence : l'émergence des savoirs sur l'homme anormal." Phd thesis, Université Paris-Diderot - Paris VII, 2011. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00876157.
Повний текст джерелаRuss, Andrew. "The illusion of history : time and its absence in the radical political imagination." Thesis, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2440/63570.
Повний текст джерелаThesis (Ph.D.) - University of Adelaide, School of Humanities, 2007
"Power and resistance in dystopian literature: a Foucauldian reading of three novels." 1997. http://library.cuhk.edu.hk/record=b5896261.
Повний текст джерелаThesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1997.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 177-182).
Abstract --- p.i
Acknowledgements --- p.i v
Table of Contents --- p.v
Abbreviations used for Foucault's Works --- p.vi
Chapter Chapter 1 --- Introduction: Power and Resistance in Foucault --- p.1
Chapter Chapter 2 --- 1984-The Axis of Power --- p.29
Chapter Chapter 3 --- Brave New World--The Axis of Sexuality --- p.70
Chapter Chapter 4 --- The Handmaid's Tale-The Axis of Knowledge --- p.117
Chapter Chapter 5 --- Conclusion: Resistant Topos´ؤFrom Dystopia to Heterotopia --- p.167
Works Cited --- p.177
Bibliography --- p.182
McIntyre, Katharine Mangano. "Freedom From Domination: A Foucauldian Account of Power, Subject Formation, and the Need for Recognition." Thesis, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8JW8DRT.
Повний текст джерелаКниги з теми "1926-1984 contributions in political science"
Dumm, Thomas L. Michel Foucault and the politics of freedom. Walnut Creek: Altamira, 2000.
Знайти повний текст джерелаMichel Foucault and the politics of freedom. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications, 1996.
Знайти повний текст джерелаPickett, Brent. On the use and abuse of Foucault for politics. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2005.
Знайти повний текст джерелаFoucault & the political. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 1995.
Знайти повний текст джерелаThe political philosophy of Michel Foucault. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Знайти повний текст джерелаFoucault, Michel. Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977-1984. New York, USA: Routledge, 1988.
Знайти повний текст джерелаPowers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Знайти повний текст джерелаJeremy, Moss, ed. The later Foucault: Politics and philosophy. London: Sage Publications, 1998.
Знайти повний текст джерелаHengehold, Laura. The body problematic: Political imagination in Kant and Foucault. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007.
Знайти повний текст джерелаHengehold, Laura. The body problematic: Political imagination in Kant and Foucault. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.
Знайти повний текст джерела