Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / ?-1649 Criticism and interpretation / Статті в журналах

Статті в журналах з теми "?-1649 Criticism and interpretation"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: ?-1649 Criticism and interpretation.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021

Оновлено: 13 лютого 2022

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "?-1649 Criticism and interpretation".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Stanglin, Keith D. "The Rise and Fall of Biblical Perspicuity: Remonstrants and the Transition toward Modern Exegesis." Church History 83, no. 1 (March 2014): 38–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009640713001674.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The purpose of this article is to examine the biblical exegesis of two seventeenth-century Dutch Remonstrant theologians, Simon Episcopius (1583–1643) and Étienne de Courcelles (1586–1659). Their hermeneutic was characterized by an emphasis on the perspicuity, or clarity, of scripture through the use of reason, combined with the marginalization of spiritual meanings in favor of the literal-grammatical sense alone. In both of these emphases, they went beyond their theological forebear, Jacob Arminius (1559–1609), and adumbrated the methods of later Enlightenment thinkers. The stress on perspicuity and authorial intention led to increasing fascination with text criticism, linguistic analysis, and historical contextualization, highly rarefied disciplines that became prerequisites for correct, scholarly biblical interpretation. This development also pushed the question of biblical fallibility closer to the center of the doctrine of scripture. As a consequence of the philological, scientific study of the Bible, biblical interpretation was relegated to the field of scholarship and doctrinal formulation to the church. The original ideal of biblical perspicuity resulted in biblical obscurity.

2

Havelock, Rohan. "THE “UNITARY EXERCISE” OF CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION." Cambridge Law Journal 76, no. 3 (November 2017): 486–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197317000745.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

LORD Hoffmann's famous “restatement” of the principles of contractual interpretation in Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 W.L.R. 896, 912–13, was heralded as a “quiet revolution” (McLauchlan (2000) 19 N.Z.U.L.R. 147, at 148) in that it appeared to overthrow the legalistic approach of the past. That approach, often associated with the “plain meaning rule” (Bank of New Zealand v Simpson [1990] A.C. 182 (PC), 189) involved giving effect to the expressed meaning of the text, which (limited exceptions aside) could not be contradicted by the relevant background (or matrix of fact). By contrast, the approach in ICS mandated the Court to search for the apparently intended meaning by consulting the relevant and admissible background in all cases. The ICS approach rapidly became dominant, and indeed orthodox, across multiple jurisdictions. However, in a series of judgments commencing with Re Sigma Finance Corporation [2009] UKSC 2; [2010] 1 All E.R. 571, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has gradually moved away from the approach in ICS (albeit without expressly overruling it) and emphasised the importance of giving effect to the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used, in combination with other factors (see especially Marley v Rawlings [2014] UKSC 2; [2014] 2 W.L.R. 213, at [18]–[19]; Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] A.C. 1619, at [14]–[23]). This return to a more traditional approach to interpretation vindicates sustained criticism of the validity of the ICS approach in principle and practice (see e.g. Staughton [1999] C.L.J. 303; Berg (2006) 122 L.Q.R. 354; Buxton [2010] C.L.J. 253).

3

Zhezhko-Braun, Irina. ""Project 1619" as an alternative to "American project"." Ideas and Ideals 13, no. 1-1 (March 19, 2021): 80–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2021-13.1.1-80-111.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article is the second in a series on the birth of a new elite in the United States, called ‘the minority elite’. The previous article hypothesized that what is happening is not so much the replenishment or evolution of the old elite, but the emergence of a new one, grown on the basis of the Affirmative Action Program, the culture of ‘woke capitalism’ and decades of the minority protest. The process of elite change intensified on the wave of protest activity of black minority, primarily ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement, in the summer of 2020, which coincided with elections to all branches of government. The new elite need to create their own version of American history and their liberation mission. The ideological paradigm of the black movement includes several social doctrines: ‘The 1619 Project’, critical race theory, Black liberation, theories of white privilege, white supremacy and anti-racism. ‘The 1619 Project’ clearly demonstrates how the new elite understand the past, present and future of the United States and their place in the social structure. This article analyzes the theses of ‘1619’, and also contains the main conclusions of the professional criticism of this project. The goal of the project, according to its authors, is to reframe American history. It places slavery and systematic racism at the very center of US history and thereby denies the foundations on which the ‘American project’ is based. ‘1619’ is considered in the article as a socio-engineering project that includes various programs: curricula for colleges and schools, podcasts for radio, TV shows and films, interviews and speeches in universities, exhibitions, press publications, ideological themes for elections and trainings for organizations and social movements. The unprecedented speed of implementation and the scale of financing of the new version of American history in all spheres of society without its professional assessment indicate that this large-scale action was prepared in advance. The article deals with the fundamental factual errors in the presentation of history, analysis and interpretation of economic data in ‘1619’, including those that were uncritically borrowed from the school ‘New History of Capitalism’. It also addresses the doctrine of anti-racism. The analysis of the project showed a low level of evidence of the revision of history conceived in it. The author shows by the example of ‘1619’ that scientific research is not combined with ideological tasks, since the latter inevitably lead to adjustment to the given answer, a decrease in the level of the applied scientific apparatus and simplification of the conclusions drawn. Criticism of the project was heard only in the academic sphere, but did not get into the media. One of the most serious consequences of the project is the creation of a new mythology, supplanting from the public consciousness a version of American history based on the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and proven historical facts. The black movement, albeit temporarily, managed to impose its own narrative on public opinion and create a rationale for moving into power and receiving new privileges.

4

Carvalho, Alda, Carlos Pereira dos Santos, and Jorge Nuno Silva. "Allégorie de la Géométrie. A Mathematical Interpretation." Recreational Mathematics Magazine 3, no. 5 (March 1, 2016): 33–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rmm-2016-0003.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Senchuk, Dennis M., and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Noûs 26, no. 3 (September 1992): 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215966.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Zaret, David, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Contemporary Sociology 17, no. 1 (January 1988): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069485.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Rosen, Bernard. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (November 1988): 704–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780237.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Gorski, Philip S. "SCIENTISM, INTERPRETATION, AND CRITICISM." Zygon� 25, no. 3 (September 1990): 279–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00793.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Rosen, Bernard, and Michael Walzer. "Interpretation and Social Criticism." Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 6 (November 1988): 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1982241.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Hill, Christopher. "Review: Lines of Authority: Politics and English Literary Criticism, 1649–1689." Literature & History 5, no. 2 (September 1996): 79–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030619739600500211.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Rosenberg, Ruth, and Jerome J. McGann. "Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation." South Central Review 3, no. 4 (1986): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3189693.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Morrow, Jeffrey L. "The Politics of Biblical Interpretation: A ‘Criticism of Criticism’." New Blackfriars 91, no. 1035 (August 12, 2010): 528–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2009.01342.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Evans, R. L. S., and George A. Kennedy. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Classical World 80, no. 3 (1987): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4350026.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Davies, Paul, Greta Gaard, and Patrick D. Murphy. "Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy." Modern Language Review 95, no. 4 (October 2000): 1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3736723.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Herbert, T. Walter, Roberta Rubenstein, and Amy Schrager Lang. "Feminist Literary Criticism and Cultural Interpretation." American Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1987): 656. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2713134.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Arutynyan, J. I. "Contemporary art criticism: judgment and interpretation." Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture, no. 1 (30) (March 2017): 177–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-2020-3-177-180.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

An important question of contemporary art studies is the problem of expanding the methodological base of the discipline. Modern art criticism refl ects the fundamental problems of contemporary art. Clash of the axiological approaches and the principle of interpretation, subjectivity, the infl uence of requests of the art market and commercialization are the main problems of formation of the expressive language of art criticism in the 20th–21st centuries

17

Fowler, Robert M., and George A. Kennedy. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Journal of Biblical Literature 105, no. 2 (June 1986): 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3260415.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Perry, John Oliver, and G. N. Devy. "Indian Literary Criticism: Theory and Interpretation." World Literature Today 77, no. 1 (2003): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40157830.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Robbins, Vernon K. "New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Rhetorica 3, no. 2 (1985): 145–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.2.145.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Taylor, James E. "Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism." Philosophy Compass 2, no. 4 (July 2007): 611–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00088.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Woodward, Michael. "Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation." Theological Librarianship 2, no. 1 (April 27, 2009): 113–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31046/tl.v2i1.74.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Dietrich, Richard S. "Book Review: Interpretation and Social Criticism." Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 42, no. 3 (July 1988): 310–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096438804200315.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Slater, Niall W. "‘Against Interpretation’: Petronius and art Criticism." Ramus 16, no. 1-2 (1987): 165–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0048671x00003295.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

For forty years a debate has raged in Petronian studies between the moralists and, for want of a better term, the anti-moralists. From Highet in the 1940's to Bacon and Arrowsmith in the 1950's and 60's, the moralists held a certain advantage. Whatever important divergences there were among these critics, all agreed on a Petronius who stood in some critical relation to his society. The dissenting voices have grown much louder of late. Ironically, the literary brilliance of Arrowsmith's New Critical reading of the Satyricon helped to turn the tide against the moralist viewpoint. The more apparent the literary sophistication of the Satyricon has become, the less willing late twentieth century readers have been to see a programmatic moral critique as its main purpose. Sullivan's view of Petronius as a ‘literary opportunist’ has come to dominate the field.With Graham Anderson's book, Eros Sophistes: Ancient Novelists at Play, the retreat from the position of Highet is now complete. We have finally reached the logical, New Critical conclusion that the Satyricon is an entirely self-contained literary game without any message whatsoever; in effect we are told that, like any serious piece of literature, the Satyricon ‘should not mean, but be’. Anderson is eager to disavow ‘the unproven conviction that every work must have a message, however diffusely or perversely expressed’.

24

Balabaud, Charles, and Paulette Bioulac-Sage. "Glutamine synthetase interpretation in hepatocellular adenoma." Virchows Archiv 465, no. 4 (September 13, 2014): 495–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-014-1649-8.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

JEON, Kyung-Jin. "A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche." Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (December 31, 2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.02.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

JEON, Kyung-Jin. "A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche." Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (December 31, 2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.2.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Pelias, Ronald J. "Schools of interpretation thought and performance criticism." Southern Speech Communication Journal 50, no. 4 (December 1985): 348–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372640.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Kaufman, Daniel A. "Interpretation and the “Investigative” Concept of Criticism." Angelaki 17, no. 1 (March 2012): 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725x.2012.671635.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

NANNICELLI, TED. "Ethical Criticism and the Interpretation of Art." Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75, no. 4 (October 2017): 401–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12395.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

West, David W. "Practical Criticism: I.A. Richards' experiment in interpretation." Changing English 9, no. 2 (October 2002): 207–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1358684022000006311.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Wicaksono, Arif. "Pandangan Kekristenan Tentang Higher Criticism." FIDEI: Jurnal Teologi Sistematika dan Praktika 1, no. 1 (June 23, 2018): 115–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.34081/fidei.v1i1.6.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The interpretation of the Bible in the present continues to grow rapidly. This progress has both positive and negative effects in the realm of biblical interpretation. The positive impact that is with the progress of interpretation, it was found many truth values that were not understood and now start out one by one. The negative as the progress of biblical interpretation is the loss of boundaries. With the method of high-criticism interpretation makes the Bible originally believed to be the infallible Word, and now it is equated with another book of lesser value than the scriptures. The Bible is aligned with the ordinary book, even the authority of the Bible as God's Word is in doubt, denied and demeaned to an ordinary literary work.This is a challenge for Christianity today. It takes a firm stance in the face of the Higher Criticism interpretation movement. Christians need to determine a position to deflect any allegations that undermine the authority of the Bible and any allegations that cast doubt on the inspiration and revelation of the existing Scriptures. This paper is expected to give a little apologetic response to the Higher Criticism movement Keywords: Higher Criticism, Apologetic, Bible AbstrakPenafsiran Alkitab dalam masa kini terus mengalami perkembangan dengan pesat. Kemajuan ini memberikan dampak positif maupun negative dalam ranah dunia tafsir Alkitab. Positive karena dengan kemajuannya banak nilai-nilai kebenaran yang dul tidak dipahami mulai keluar satu persatu. Negatifnya saat kemajuan penafsiran Alkitab kehilangan batasan, dengan metode penafsiran higher Critism menjadikan Alkitab yang awalnya diyakini sebagai Firman yang tanpa salah, layaknya buku lain yang nilainya lebih rendah dari kitab suci. Aklitab disejajarkan dengan buku biasa. Bahkah otoritas Alkitab sebagai Firman Allah diragukan, disangkal dan direndahkan sebatas karya sastra biasa.Ini merupakan tantangan bagai kekristenan saat ini. Diperlukan sikap yang tegas dalam menghadapi pergerakan penafsiran Higher Critism. Orang Kristen perlu menentukan posisi dalam menangkis segala tuduhan yang merendahkan otoritas Alkitab. Segala tuduhan yang meragukan pengilhaman dan pewahyuan penulisan kitab Suci yang ada. Tulisan ini diharapkan memberikan sedikit sikap apologetika terhadap gerakan Higer Critism Kata Kunci: Higer Critism, Apologet, Alkitab

32

Ridwan, MK. "TRADISI KRITIK TAFSIR: Diskursus Kritisisme Penafsiran dalam Wacana Qur’anic Studies." Jurnal THEOLOGIA 28, no. 1 (September 14, 2017): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/teo.2017.28.1.1418.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

<div class="Section1"><p class="Iabstrak"><strong>Abstract: </strong><em>This paper aims to discuss the methodology of interpretation criticism in the qur'anic studies discourse. As new plots in the Qur'an studies, the interpretation criticism has not been much sought after by Qur’anic scholars. As a consequence, in methodological discourse has not yet found a definite method can be used to criticize an interpretation. As for the thought-provoking critique of the interpretation for this still are sporadic and likely are political-ideological. For that, it needs special attention in developing area studies the Quran towards the study criticism of interpretation. Finally, this paper gives the conclusion that, in the discourse of criticism the methodological framework needed interpretation, as a step towards the operational interpretation of criticism. So, the criticism was done not nuanced political-ideological, but able to uphold the values of objectivity, comprehensiveness, scientific and systematic. There are at least four operational steps in carrying out work interpretation of criticism of the region of ontology, epistemology, and axiology i.e; Firstly, the critic must understand the substance of exegesis are an interpretation as process and interpretation as a product. Secondly, understand the construction of criticism interpretation, namely the construction of the historicity of the critique, the base of criticism, the purpose of criticism, as well as the principles and parameters of criticism. Thirdly, start working with two regions exegesis critique work i.e; intrinsic and extrinsic criticism. Fourthly, give the evaluation and assessment of the object of study of criticism that is good and decent, or perverted and unworthy of being used.</em></p><p class="Iabstrak"><strong>Abstrak:</strong> Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mendiskusikan metodologi kritik tafsir dalam diskursus wacana Qur’anic Studies. Sebagai wilayah garapan baru dalam studi al-Qur’an, kritik tafsir belum banyak diminati oleh kalangan sarjana al-Qur’an. Akibatnya, dalam wacana metodologis belum banyak ditemukan metodebaku yang dapat digunakan untuk mengkritisi sebuah tafsir. Adapun pemikiran kritik tafsir selama ini masih bersifat sporadis dan cenderung bersifat politis-ideologis. Untuk itulah dibutuhkan perhatian khusus dalam mengembangkan wilayah studi al-Qur’an ke arah studi kritik tafsir. Akhirnya, tulisan ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa, dalam diskursus kritisisme penafsiran, dibutuhkan kerangka metodologis sebagai langkah operasional kritik tafsir. Sehingga, kritik yang dilakukan tidak bernuansa politis-ideologis, namun mampu mengedepankan nilai-nilai objektivitas, komprehensivitas, ilmiah dan sistematis. Setidaknya terdapat empat langkah operasional dalam melaksanakan kerja kritik tafsir yang bermuara pada wilayah ontologis, epistemologis, dan aksiologis yaitu; Pertama, kritikus harus terlebih dahulu memahami hakikat tafsir yakni tafsir sebagai proses (<em>interpretation as process</em>) dan tafsir sebagai produk (interpretation as product). Kedua, memahami konstruksi kritik tafsir, yaitu historisitas kritik, landasan kritik, tujuan kritik, serta prinsip dan parameter kritik. Ketiga, memulai kerja kritik tafsir dengan dua wilayah kerja yaitu; kritik intrinsik dan kritik ekstrinsik. Keempat, memberikan evaluasi dan penilaian terhadap objek kajian kritik yaitu, baik (<em>maḥmūd</em>) dan layak pakai (<em>maqbūl</em>), atau menyeleweng (<em>munḥarif</em>) dan tidak layak digunakan (<em>mardūd</em>).</p></div>

33

Weisbrod, Glen, and Michael Grovak. "Comparing Approaches for Valuing Economic Development Benefits of Transportation Projects." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1649, no. 1 (January 1998): 86–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1649-11.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Transportation agencies often face uncertainty regarding how to define and assess the economic magnitude of benefits associated with alternative projects and programs. Alternative types of economic impact analysis are examined, using data from a highway study in Kentucky to explore (1) differences in the definitions of economic benefits inherent in the various types of analysis, (2) reasons for their differing findings on the value of benefits, and (3) issues affecting their interpretation and use in decision making.

34

Sam-Yel Park. "Spinoza and Idealism -The Criticism of Idealistic Interpretation-." Studies in Philosophy East-West ll, no. 49 (September 2008): 297–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.15841/kspew..49.200809.297.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

이재호. "An Interpretation of Criticism of Elementary Moral Instruction." KOREAN ELEMENTARY MORAL EDUCATION SOCIETY ll, no. 31 (December 2009): 117–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17282/ethics.2009..31.117.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Vinson, Richard B. "Book Review: New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Review & Expositor 83, no. 1 (February 1986): 113–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003463738608300113.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Körner, Jürgen. "Social criticism in the process of interpretation (discussion)." International Forum of Psychoanalysis 2, no. 2 (July 1993): 115–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037069308412455.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Kermode, Frank. "Book Review: New Testament Interpretation Through Rhetorical Criticism." Theology 88, no. 724 (July 1985): 309–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040571x8508800422.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Bender, R., and P. T. Sawicki. "Interpretation of study's results is open to criticism." BMJ 312, no. 7025 (January 27, 1996): 254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7025.254.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Luque, José Luis Alexis Rivera. "Alexander Fidora Nicola Polloni: Appropriation, interpretation and criticism." Journal of Transcultural Medieval Studies 5, no. 2 (November 1, 2018): 388–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jtms-2018-0027.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Kingsbury, Jack Dean. "Book Review: New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism." Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 40, no. 1 (January 1986): 91–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096438604000121.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

Rabbany T, Al-Faiz M., and Indal Abror. "TAFSIR PROGRESIF ATAS KISAH-KISAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN KARYA EKO PRASETYO." Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis 19, no. 1 (October 12, 2019): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-05.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Kitab Pembebasan is Eko Prasetyo’s first work in the field of interpretation contains the stories of prophets and friends in the Qur'an. For him, the stories of the prophets no longer have the power to change circumstances, then progressive logic brings Eko to an interpretation of the stories of the prophet to the surrounding social problems. When many commentators who interpret the Quran relate to the social community, then interpreting the Quran leads to social criticism being unique to discuss. So this paper is focused on discussing social criticism in the Book of Liberation. In this paper, there are indications of the content of social criticism Eko Prasetyo then grouped them into five fields, namely economics, religion, education, politics and society. Then explained based on the theme specifically. Then develop social criticism based on each theme. Among them is a criticism of the economic system of capitalism, interpretation of the meaning of Satan, tyranny, seditious and idolatrous, religious and financiers, criticism of Suharto and the New Order, the case of the murderous activist Salim deer. Also, Eko's other works were reviewed to develop his criticisms. The interpretation for Eko through the Book of Liberation is the contextualization of the problems that occur around him, Eko does not care about the interpretation of the interpretation, because for Eko, the Qur'an is a book of movements that must be practiced.Keyword: Eko Prasetyo, Progressive Interpretations, Qissah, al-Qur’an

43

Uniłowski, Krzysztof, and Jakob Ziguras. "Textualism, Materialism, Immersion, Interpretation." Praktyka Teoretyczna 34, no. 4 (December 15, 2019): 13–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/prt2019.4.2.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left – we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses.Krzysztof Uniłowski passed away earlier this December. For the last twenty years, he has been crucial to Polish literary studies. Writing on a broad range of topics – from reviews of contemporary Polish novels to essays on the idea of modernity, from class-oriented analyses of sci-fi books and TV shows to comments on the politics and ethics of literary criticism – he developed an impressive and highly unique critical perspective, or indeed: a unique language of criticism, one that has managed and will undoubtedly still manage to inspire countless critics of all generations. Throughout his work, Uniłowski drew heavily on historical materialism, constantly balancing his instinctive focus on the political – and, specifically, on class – with his equally instinctive conviction as to the irreplaceability of literary form. While we might not have agreed on every single issue – as is always the case on the Left– we in “Praktyka Teoretyczna” are proud to have called him not just an inspiration, but a comrade. Uniłowski passed away while putting finishing touches to the essay we’re presenting below. Unfortunately, he never managed to send us the finished abstract/summary for this article, so it falls to us to try and summarise its main theses. The issues raised in this erudite and formally complex piece include such fundamental questions as: in what sense do the fictional worlds resemble the non-fictional one, and how do we inhabit them? What’s the relationship between immersion and interpretation? What real-life figures can help us imagine or visualise our intimate yet inherently social relationship with the fictional (are we guests, dwellers, passersby...)? Uniłowski looks for answers in contemporary Marxist criticism (Eagleton, Jameson, Berardi), sci-fi and fantasy writing (Lem, Sapkowski, Martin), as well as modern continental philoso phy (Gadamer, Heidegger) and – in the last part of the essay – contemporary game studies. We’re happy to be able to present Uniłowski’s piece in two versions, the original Polish as well as its English translation (by Jakob Ziguras). In order to preserve the unmistakable flow of Uniłowski’s thought in English, small changes were introduced – with the author’s full approval – in the English version. We trust that our Polish-speaking readers will fin the comparison of the two versions interesting and instruc tive, as they seem to give a unique insight into Uniłowski’s writing process.

44

Beller, Mara. "Criticism and Revolutions." Science in Context 10, no. 1 (1997): 13–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0269889700000247.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The ArgumentIn this paper I argue that Kuhn's and Hanson's notion of incommensurable paradigms is rooted in the rhetoric of finality of the Copenhagen dogma — the orthodox philosophical interpretation of quantum physics. I also argue that arguments for holism of a paradigm, on which the notion of the impossibility of its gradual modification is based, misinterpret the Duhem-Quine thesis. The history of science (Copernican, Chemical, and Quantum Revolutions) demonstrates fruitful selective appropriation of ideas from seemingly “incommensurable” paradigms (rather than the impossibility of communication between their representatives). I argue in conclusion that such openness underlies scientific creativity, and that dialogue between different alternatives is indispensable for the growth of knowledge.

45

Beller, Mara. "Criticism and Revolutions." Science in Context 10, no. 1 (1997): 13–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0269889700002519.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The ArgumentIn this paper I argue that Kuhn's and Hanson's notion of incommensurable paradigms is rooted in the rhetoric of finality of the Copenhagen dogma — the orthodox philosophical interpretation of quantum physics. I also argue that arguments for holism of a paradigm, on which the notion of the impossibility of its gradual modification is based, misinterpret the Duhem-Quine thesis. The history of science (Copernican, Chemical, and Quantum Revolutions) demonstrates fruitful selective appropriation of ideas from seemingly “incommensurable” paradigms (rather than the impossibility of communication between their representatives). I argue in conclusion that such openness underlies scientific creativity, and that dialogue between different alternatives is indispensable for the growth of knowledge.

46

Jones, Mark. "John Calvin’s Reception at the Westminster Assembly (1643–1649)." Church History and Religious Culture 91, no. 1-2 (2011): 215–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187124111x557872.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Of all the Reformation theologians, John Calvin exerted arguably the most influence on the English Puritans. That did not mean, however, that his theology was uncritically accepted. This chapter considers the reception of Calvin’s theology at the Westminster Assembly on two doctrines that were debated among the Westminster divines, namely, the eternal generation of the Son of God and the so-called descent of Christ into Hell. Calvin’s somewhat unique position on the Son’s aseity and his interpretation of Christ’s descent were considered by the Assembly, but ultimately rejected by the majority, though not all, of the Westminster divines. Nevertheless, the Westminster documents are not quite detailed enough to contradict Calvin’s position on the Son’s aseity, but the Larger Catechism definitely departs from Calvin’s teaching on Christ’s descent into Hell. Moreover, the relation of the Apostles’ Creed and Nicene Creed to Reformed theology in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries also comes under consideration in this chapter.

47

Thiel, John E. "Dei Verbum: Scripture, Tradition, and Historical Criticism." Horizons 47, no. 2 (September 22, 2020): 207–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/hor.2020.56.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The Council Fathers at Vatican II struggled to negotiate the Council's teaching on divine revelation with regard to the teaching of Trent, but more immediately with regard to the modern theology of the Magisterium and the modern value of historical criticism that had recently been recognized by Pius XII as having a legitimate role in the interpretation of Scripture. Dei Verbum's teaching stressed the unity of Scripture and tradition in the revelation of God's word, but never considered the role of historical criticism in the interpretation of God's word in tradition that it affirmed in God's revelation in the biblical word. This article argues that the recognition of the legitimate role of historical criticism in the interpretation of tradition remains an issue of needed development in the teaching of Dei Verbum.

48

Brueggemann, Walter. "Agency and Restraint in Interpretation." Theology Today 74, no. 4 (January 2018): 340–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040573617731709.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

With the work of Theodore Ziolkowski as a model, this article probes the work of biblical interpretation with reference to both agency and restraint. The exercise of interpretive agency means the interpreter has immense freedom. We are able to see how that interpretive freedom has played out in creedal readings, in scholastic interpretation, and in the work of historical criticism. At the same time, however, it is clear that restraints of method and perspective cannot contain all of the richness of scripture. Thus after creedal reading, there is still evidence of the quixotic in the narrative of God. In the midst of scholastic reductionism there is still an inexplicable dynamism, and in the work of historical criticism, there is still testimony to the Holy One that will not be contained in the modes of Enlightenment rationality. Responsible interpretation must at the same time recognize certain restraints and allow for surges in the textual testimony that move against such restraints.

49

Kerman, Joseph. "Round Table VIII: Analysis and Interpretation in Musical Criticism." Acta Musicologica 59, no. 1 (January 1987): 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/932861.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

May, Jill P. "Theory and Textual Interpretation: Children's Literature and Literary Criticism." Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association 30, no. 1/2 (1997): 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1315428.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.