Artigos de revistas: "Quality indicators"

1

Takahashi, Osamu, e Tsuguya Fukui. "2. Quality Indicators". Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi 99, n.º 12 (2010): 3035–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/naika.99.3035.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

2

Decker, Carole. "Quality Indicators". Cardiology in Review 14, n.º 6 (novembro de 2006): 308–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.crd.0000244461.25429.81.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

3

Zilberberg, Marya D., e Andrew F. Shorr. "Quality Indicators". Critical Care Medicine 42, n.º 8 (agosto de 2014): 1946–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000000459.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

4

Kleinpell, Ruth M. "Quality Indicators". AACN Clinical Issues: Advanced Practice in Acute and Critical Care 16, n.º 2 (abril de 2005): 119–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00044067-200504000-00001.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

5

VENTURA, MARLENE R., JANET RIZZO e SHERRIE LENZ. "Quality Indicators". Nursing Management (Springhouse) 24, n.º 1 (janeiro de 1993): 46???50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006247-199301000-00009.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

6

Prosser-Snelling, Edward, e Edward Morris. "Quality Indicators". Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 27, n.º 9 (setembro de 2017): 290–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2017.06.008.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

7

Hjorth-Andersen, Chr. "Quality indicators". European Economic Review 35, n.º 8 (dezembro de 1991): 1491–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90014-a.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

8

Flomenbaum, Neal. "Putting Quality Into Quality Indicators". Emergency Medicine 48, n.º 4 (1 de abril de 2016): 148. http://dx.doi.org/10.12788/emed.2016.0025.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

9

Mahmudov, Yusuf Ganievich, e Bakhtiyor Berdievich Imanov. "Lesson quality indicators". Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research 10, n.º 10 (2021): 653–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2278-4853.2021.00784.9.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

10

Salzer, Mark S., Carol T. Nixon, L. James A. Schut, Marc S. Karver e Leonard Bickman. "Validating Quality Indicators". Evaluation Review 21, n.º 3 (junho de 1997): 292–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9702100302.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

11

Anderson, Joseph C., e Lynn F. Butterly. "Colonoscopy: Quality Indicators". Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology 6, n.º 2 (fevereiro de 2015): e77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2015.5.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

12

Dumanski, Julian. "Land quality indicators". Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 81, n.º 2 (outubro de 2000): 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00181-x.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

13

Smith, Mary Atkinson, Lynne Jacobs, Lauren Rodier, Ashley Taylor e Carlotta Taylor-White. "Clinical Quality Indicators". Orthopaedic Nursing 30, n.º 5 (2011): 301–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nor.0b013e31822e077b.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

14

&NA;. "Clinical Quality Indicators". Orthopaedic Nursing 30, n.º 5 (2011): 305–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nor.0b013e318231c29d.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

15

Cadotte, Tory, Zahra Ismail, Lesley Moody e Maria Rugg. "Psychosocial oncology quality indicators prioritization exercise." Journal of Clinical Oncology 34, n.º 7_suppl (1 de março de 2016): 277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.34.7_suppl.277.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

277 Background: One of Cancer Care Ontario’s (CCO) roles is to monitor and report on cancer system performance to support quality improvement. CCO’s Psychosocial Oncology (PSO) program developed a measurement plan with potential indicators to evaluate patient access to and the effectiveness of PSO services across the province. The objective of this study was to conduct a modified Delphi process to build consensus and prioritize PSO indicators based on their relevance to provincial goals, ability to measure regional and provincial performance and result in tangible actions. Methods: Through consultations and literature reviews, 16 measurement concepts were identified as quality indicators for the PSO Program. Members of the PSO Provincial Committee (n = 32) evaluated each indicator based on set criteria: relevance, outcome-focused, directional, and actionable. Two rounds of input was gathered through a structured worksheet with a minimum response rate of 60%. Round one was based on a simple ‘Yes or No’ response to the indicators’ ability to meet the defined criteria. Participants were encouraged to comment on each indicator and suggest new indicators. Indicators not meeting at least half of the evaluation criteria, on average, were removed from the list. Net new indicators suggested by at least 10% of respondents were included in round two. In round two, members rated each indicator on a scale of 1-5, indicating to what degree the indicator met the evaluation criteria. Results: After round one, the original list was narrowed from sixteen to nine indicators. Four new indicators were also added. After round two, three indicators were identified as meeting the evaluation criteria: 1) wait times to specialized PSO services, 2) access to registered dietitian services by the head and neck cancer population, and 3) documented follow-up with patients with anxiety and/or depression. Prioritized indicators were reviewed with the PSO Committee and CCO senior leadership to confirm direction. Conclusions: The prioritization exercise provided consensus across divergent perspectives and identified top priorities. Work is underway to further develop/refine these indicators for provincial reporting.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

16

Unoki, Takeshi. "Quality indicators in critical care nursing". Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine 20, n.º 3 (2013): 381–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.3918/jsicm.20.381.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

17

Breyer, Juliana Zeni, Juliana Giacomazzi, Regina Kuhmmer, Karine Margarites Lima, Luciano Serpa Hammes, Rodrigo Antonini Ribeiro, Natália Luiza Kops, Maicon Falavigna e Eliana Marcia Wendland. "Hospital quality indicators: a systematic review". International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 32, n.º 2 (11 de março de 2019): 474–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-04-2018-0091.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify and describe hospital quality indicators, classifying them according to Donabedian’s structure, process and outcome model and in specific domains (quality, safety, infection and mortality) in two care divisions: inpatient and emergency services.Design/methodology/approachA systematic review identified hospital clinical indicators. Two independent investigators evaluated 70 articles/documents located in electronic databases and nine documents from the grey literature, 35 were included in the systematic review.FindingsIn total, 248 hospital-based indicators were classified as infection, safety, quality and mortality domains. Only 10.2 percent were identified in more than one article/document and 47 percent showed how they were calculated/obtained. Although there are scientific papers on developing, validating and hospital indicator assessment, most indicators were obtained from technical reports, government publications or health professional associations.Research limitations/implicationsThis review identified several hospital structure, process and outcome quality indicators, which are used by different national and international groups in both research and clinical practice. Comparing performance between healthcare organizations was difficult. Common clinical care standard indicators used by different networks, programs and institutions are essential to hospital quality benchmarking.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic review to identify and describe hospital quality indicators after a comprehensive search in MEDLINE/PubMed, etc., and the grey literature, aiming to identify as many indicators as possible. Few studies evaluate the indicators, and most are found only in the grey literature, and have been published mostly by government agencies. Documents published in scientific journals usually refer to a specific indicator or to constructing an indicator. However, indicators most commonly found are not supported by reliability or validity studies.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

18

Mainz, J. "Quality indicators: essential for quality improvement". International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16, suppl_1 (1 de abril de 2004): i1—i2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzh036.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

19

Sewitch, Maida J., Catherine Dubé, Stephanie Brien, Mengzhu Jiang, Robert J. Hilsden, Alan N. Barkun e David Armstrong. "Patient-Identified Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy Services". Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 27, n.º 1 (2013): 25–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/574956.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

BACKGROUND: Current quality improvement tools for endoscopy services, such as the Global Rating Scale (GRS), emphasize the need for patient-centred care. However, there are no studies that have investigated patient expectations and/or perceptions of quality indicators in endoscopy services.OBJECTIVES: To identify quality indicators for colonoscopy services from the patient perspective; to rate indicators of importance; to determine factors that influence indicator ratings; and to compare the identified indicators with those of the GRS.METHODS: A two-phase mixed methods study was undertaken in Montreal (Quebec), Calgary (Alberta) and Hamilton (Ontario) among patients ≥18 years of age who spoke and read English or French. In phase 1, focus group participants identified quality indicators that were then used to construct a survey questionnaire. In phase 2, survey questionnaires, which were completed immediately after colonoscopy, prompted respondents to rate the 20 focus group-derived indicators according to their level of importance (low, medium, high) and to list up to nine additional items. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors that influenced focus group-derived indicator ratings. Patient-identified indicators were compared with those used in the GRS to identify novel indicators.RESULTS: Three quality indicator themes were identified by 66 participants in 12 focus groups: communication, comfort and service environment. Of the 828 surveys distributed, 402 (48.6%) were returned and 65% of focus group-derived indicators were rated highly important by at least 55% of survey respondents. Indicator ratings differed according to age, sex, site and perceived colorectal cancer risk. Of the 29 patient-identified indicators, 17 (58.6%) were novel.CONCLUSIONS: Patients identified 17 novel quality indicators, suggesting that patients and health professionals differ in their perspectives with respect to quality in colonoscopy services.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

20

Kolozsvári, László Róbert, e Imre Rurik. "Quality improvement in primary care. Financial incentives related to quality indicators in Europe". Orvosi Hetilap 154, n.º 28 (julho de 2013): 1096–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/oh.2013.29631.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Quality improvement in primary care has been an important issue worldwide for decades. Quality indicators are increasingly used quantitative tools for quality measurement. One of the possible motivational methods for doctors to provide better medical care is the implementation of financial incentives, however, there is no sufficient evidence to support or contradict their effect in quality improvement. Quality indicators and financial incentives are used in the primary care in more and more European countries. The authors provide a brief update on the primary care quality indicator systems of the United Kingdom, Hungary and other European countries, where financial incentives and quality indicators were introduced. There are eight countries where quality indicators linked to financial incentives are used which can influence the finances/salary of family physicians with a bonus of 1–25%. Reliable data are essential for quality indicators, although such data are lacking in primary care of most countries. Further, improvement of indicator systems should be based on broad professional consensus. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 1096–1101.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

21

Willis, Cameron D., Susan M. Evans, Johannes U. Stoelwinder e Peter A. Cameron. "Measuring quality". Australian Health Review 31, n.º 2 (2007): 276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ah070276.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

It is no longer sufficient for health care professionals to provide high quality health care, they must also be able to demonstrate that they are meeting and often exceeding quality targets. Quality indicators (QIs) provide a means of measuring and assessing quality, however there are advantages and disadvantages of indicator measurement. Further, the clinical perspective needs to be balanced against managerial control when developing valid, reliable, sensitive and specific QIs. While indicators do not represent a perfect measurement device, they may provide a useful tool for improving patient safety and meeting community expectations.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

22

Omelchenko, Julia, e Igor Demidov. "Quality indicators waxlike substances". Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI» Series: New solutions in modern technologies, n.º 42 (1214) (29 de dezembro de 2016): 193–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.20998/2413-4295.2016.42.31.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

23

Matute, Jorge, e A. P. Gupta. "Data Quality and Indicators". American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2, n.º 1 (1 de janeiro de 2007): 23–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2007.23.30.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

24

Enns, Robert. "Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy". Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 21, n.º 5 (2007): 277–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/582062.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

25

Rex, Douglas K., John L. Petrini, Todd H. Baron, Amitabh Chak, Jonathan Cohen, Stephen E. Deal, Brenda Hoffman et al. "Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy". American Journal of Gastroenterology 101, n.º 4 (abril de 2006): 873–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00673.x.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

26

Cohen, Jonathan, Michael A. Safdi, Stephen E. Deal, Todd H. Baron, Amitabh Chak, Brenda Hoffman, Brian C. Jacobson et al. "Quality Indicators for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy". American Journal of Gastroenterology 101, n.º 4 (abril de 2006): 886–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00676.x.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

27

Sauer, Cary G., e Catharine M. Walsh. "Pediatric Colonoscopy Quality Indicators". Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 68, n.º 5 (maio de 2019): 607–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0000000000002324.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

28

Shahangian, Shahram, e Susan R. Snyder. "Laboratory Medicine Quality Indicators". American Journal of Clinical Pathology 131, n.º 3 (março de 2009): 418–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/ajcpjf8ji4zldque.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

29

Park, Walter G., Nicholas J. Shaheen, Jonathan Cohen, Irving M. Pike, Douglas G. Adler, John M. Inadomi, Loren A. Laine et al. "Quality Indicators for EGD". American Journal of Gastroenterology 110, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2015): 60–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.384.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

30

Rex, Douglas K., Philip S. Schoenfeld, Jonathan Cohen, Irving M. Pike, Douglas G. Adler, Brian M. Fennerty, John G. Lieb et al. "Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy". American Journal of Gastroenterology 110, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2015): 72–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.385.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

31

Adler, Douglas G., John G. Lieb, Jonathan Cohen, Irving M. Pike, Walter G. Park, Maged K. Rizk, Mandeep S. Sawhney et al. "Quality Indicators for ERCP". American Journal of Gastroenterology 110, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2015): 91–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.386.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

32

Wani, Sachin, Michael B. Wallace, Jonathan Cohen, Irving M. Pike, Douglas G. Adler, Michael L. Kochman, John G. Lieb et al. "Quality Indicators for EUS". American Journal of Gastroenterology 110, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2015): 102–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.387.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

33

Cionini, Luca, Gianstefano Gardani, Pietro Gabriele, Secondo Magri, Pier Luigi Morosini, Antonella Rosi e Vincenza Viti. "Quality indicators in radiotherapy". Radiotherapy and Oncology 82, n.º 2 (fevereiro de 2007): 191–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.12.009.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

34

Nowaczyk, Ronald H., e David G. Underwood. "Indicators of Research Quality". education policy analysis archives 3 (22 de dezembro de 1995): 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v3n20.1995.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

The move toward more public accountability of institutions of higher education has focused primarily on undergraduate education. Yet, many institutions view research as an important component of their mission. Much of the literature on assessing research quality has relied on quantitative measures such as level of outside funding and number of publications generated. Focus groups consisting of research faculty were conducted at a landgrant university. Faculty were asked to evaluate current indicators of research quality as well as to suggest additional measures. While faculty recognized the need for the traditional measures, they cautioned against over-reliance on these indicators. Additional indicators focusing on graduate education as well as external peer reviews were recommended. Developing indicators that provide evidence of long-term impact on social and scientific advancement was suggested.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

35

Christman, Luther P. "Quality Indicators in Nursing". Nursing Administration Quarterly 22, n.º 4 (1998): 91–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006216-199802240-00026.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

36

Cohen, Jonathan, Michael A. Safdi, Stephen E. Deal, Todd H. Baron, Amitabh Chak, Brenda Hoffman, Brian C. Jacobson et al. "Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 63, n.º 4 (abril de 2006): S10—S15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.018.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

37

Rex, Douglas K., John L. Petrini, Todd H. Baron, Amitabh Chak, Jonathan Cohen, Stephen E. Deal, Brenda Hoffman et al. "Quality indicators for colonoscopy". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 63, n.º 4 (abril de 2006): S16—S28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.021.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

38

Langemo, Diane K., Julie Anderson e Cecilia M. Volden. "Nursing Quality Outcome Indicators". JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration 32, n.º 2 (fevereiro de 2002): 98–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200202000-00009.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

39

Wani, Sachin, Michael B. Wallace, Jonathan Cohen, Irving M. Pike, Douglas G. Adler, Michael L. Kochman, John G. Lieb et al. "Quality indicators for EUS". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 81, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2015): 67–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.054.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

40

Adler, Douglas G., John G. Lieb, Jonathan Cohen, Irving M. Pike, Walter G. Park, Maged K. Rizk, Mandeep S. Sawhney et al. "Quality indicators for ERCP". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 81, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2015): 54–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.056.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

41

Park, Walter G., Nicholas J. Shaheen, Jonathan Cohen, Irving M. Pike, Douglas G. Adler, John M. Inadomi, Loren A. Laine et al. "Quality indicators for EGD". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 81, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2015): 17–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.057.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

42

Rex, Douglas K., Philip S. Schoenfeld, Jonathan Cohen, Irving M. Pike, Douglas G. Adler, M. Brian Fennerty, John G. Lieb et al. "Quality indicators for colonoscopy". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 81, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2015): 31–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

43

Dockrell, W. B. "National quality indicators—Scotland". Studies in Educational Evaluation 14, n.º 1 (janeiro de 1988): 47–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-491x(88)90018-1.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

44

Garborg, Kjetil, Thomas de Lange e Michael Bretthauer. "Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy". Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 15, n.º 3 (12 de julho de 2017): 416–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-017-0140-4.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

45

Ikromovich, Mamatojiev Sharip, Mirzaeva Mutabar Azamovna e Xadyatullaeva Nafisa Abdusamadovna. "Factors Affecting Grain Storage Processes On Quality Indicators". American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research 02, n.º 12 (25 de dezembro de 2020): 63–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/volume02issue12-09.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

In practice, the durability of the combine harvester is of great importance because during this period the seeds acquire a conditioning character during cultivation and meet the requirements of state standards for sowing quality. Technological longevity is a term in which baking, fodder or technical properties must be preserved during the grain harvesting period. For cereal or polluting mixtures in accordance with current standards, seeds of wild plants and some cultivated plants that belong to them breathe during storage, they undergo the last ripening processes from the collection and bruising under certain conditions. These include all the patterns and features inherent in the main type of culture that makes up the grain mass.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

46

Bradley, Katharine A., Laura J. Chavez, Gwendolyn T. Lapham, Emily C. Williams, Carol E. Achtmeyer, Anna D. Rubinsky, Eric J. Hawkins, Richard Saitz e Daniel R. Kivlahan. "When Quality Indicators Undermine Quality: Bias in a Quality Indicator of Follow-Up for Alcohol Misuse". Psychiatric Services 64, n.º 10 (outubro de 2013): 1018–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200449.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

47

Safitri, Risa Hani, I. Gusti Agung Bagus Mataram e I. Putu Krisna Arta Widana. "Analysis of Receptionist Service Quality to Increase Guest Satisfaction at Hotel Yusro Jombang". International Journal of Green Tourism Research and Applications 3, n.º 2 (28 de dezembro de 2021): 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.31940/ijogtra.v3i2.58-68.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This study aimed to analyze the level of receptionist service quality in increasing guest satisfaction at Hotel Yusro Jombang, East Java. The number of samples used was 60 respondents, with a purposive sampling data collection technique. The primary data collection method for service quality variables is using a questionnaire that has been tested for its validity and reliability. The analysis technique used is Customer Satisfaction Index, Servqual, and Importance Performance Analysis, presented in a Cartesian diagram. This study indicates that there is a negative, positive and neutral gap between guest perceptions and expectations. Customers are satisfied with the services provided because the value of the positive gap is more than the negative. The quality level of receptionist service in improving guest satisfaction at Hotel Yusro Jombang has been good, because the value of customer satisfaction index (CSI) of 90.22% is in the range of 81%-100%, meaning, in general, the guest satisfaction index at Hotel Yusro Jombang is on the "very satisfied" criteria. Next, based on the result of importance-performance analysis, each indicator's position in the cartesius diagram found an indicator that is a priority to be fixed, i.e., indicator in the A quadrant and an indicator that is an achievement to be maintained indicator which is in the B quadrant. As for indicators that are considered most satisfying by guests, they are X3 indicators, X5 indicators, and X10 indicators, each of them has a score of 0.04.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

48

Petzold, Thomas, Stefanie Deckert, Paula R. Williamson e Jochen Schmitt. "Quality Measurement Recommendations Relevant to Clinical Guidelines in Germany and the United Kingdom: (What) Can We Learn From Each Other?" INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 55 (1 de janeiro de 2018): 004695801876149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0046958018761495.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

We conducted a systematic review of clinical guidelines (CGs) to examine the methodological approaches of quality indicator derivation in CGs, the frequency of quality indicators to check CG recommendations in routine care, and clinimetric properties of quality indicators. We analyzed the publicly available CG databases of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Data on the methodology of subsequent quality indicator derivation, the content and definition of recommended quality indicators, and clinimetric properties of measurement instruments were extracted. In Germany, no explicit methodological guidance exists, but 3 different approaches are used. For NICE, a general approach is used for the derivation of quality indicators out of quality standards. Quality indicators were defined in 34 out of 87 CGs (39%) in Germany and for 58 out of 133 (43%) NICE CGs. Statements regarding measurement properties of instruments for quality indicator assessment were missing in German and NICE documents. Thirteen pairs of CGs (32%) have associated quality indicators. Thirty-four quality indicators refer to the same aspect of the quality of care, which corresponds to 27% of the German and 7% of NICE quality indicators. The development of a standardized and internationally accepted methodology for the derivation of quality indicators relevant to CGs is needed to measure and compare quality of care in health care systems.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

49

Barnsley, Jan, Louise Lemieux-Charles e G. Ross Baker. "Selecting Clinical Outcome Indicators for Monitoring Quality of Care". Healthcare Management Forum 9, n.º 1 (abril de 1996): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0840-4704(10)60938-6.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Clinical outcome indicators are used to identify opportunities for improvement in patient care processes. This paper focuses on issues specific to the selection of clinical outcome indicators for use in assessing performance within and between hospitals. The issues and examples are based on the experiences of a university research team that worked in collaboration with a group of teaching hospitals to develop and monitor clinical outcome indicators. Four sets of issues are discussed: the intended use, and end users of indicator information; aspects of indicator validity; data quality; and dissemination and use of indicator information. Recommendations are made that apply to individual hospitals, groups of hospitals and health care systems.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

50

Lascu, Dana-Nicoleta, Christopher Cotter, Mari Sato e Timothy Wing. "Indicators of product quality: faith labels as branding tools". Innovative Marketing 12, n.º 2 (14 de setembro de 2016): 28–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.12(2).2016.04.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Halal and kosher foods are a growing sector in the food processing industry (Maddock, 2014). While halal and kosher labels primarily target Muslim and Jewish consumers adhering to laws that govern the production of “pure, safe, acceptable foods, consumers who do not follow either religion are increasingly showing a preference for foods with a halal or kosher label” (Maddock, 2014). This study attempts to assess whether consumers in the United States who do not follow either religion may perceive halal or kosher labels to signal a higher quality product. The study explores consumers’ understanding of the halal and kosher process, and attempts to identify the determinants of their assessments. Keywords: faith branding, kosher, halal, Islamic law, Jewish law, food marketing. JEL Classification: M31, K00

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Artigos de revistas sobre o tema "Quality indicators"

Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos