Conecte-se

Bibliografias temáticas / Peer review of research grant proposals / Livros

Siga este link para ver outros tipos de publicações sobre o tema: Peer review of research grant proposals.

Livros sobre o tema "Peer review of research grant proposals"

Autor: Grafiati

Publicado: 4 de junho de 2021

Última modificação: 31 de julho de 2024

Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos

Selecione um tipo de fonte:

Veja os 33 melhores livros para estudos sobre o assunto "Peer review of research grant proposals".

Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.

Veja os livros das mais diversas áreas científicas e compile uma bibliografia correta.

1

National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Peer Review Procedures. Improving research through peer review. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1987.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

2

National Cancer Institute (U.S.), ed. Share your expertise with us. [Bethesda Md.]: National Cancer Insitute, 2001.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

3

Center for Scientific Review (National Institutes of Health). What happens to your grant application: A primer for new applicants. 8^a ed. Bethesda, Md.]: Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 2011.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

4

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs, ed. Peer review: Reforms needed to ensure fairness in federal agency grant selection : report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1994.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

5

Langfeldt, Liv. Fagfellevurdering som forskningspolitisk virkemiddel: En studie av fordelingen av frie midler i Norges forskningsråd. Oslo: NIFU, Norsk institutt for studier av forskning og utdanning, 1998.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

6

Richard, Mandel. A half century of peer review, 1946-1996. Bethesda, MD (2760 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria 22314): Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, 1996.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

7

Hill, Anne. Addressing common problems: Guidance for submitting European Commission fifth framework proposals. Birmingham: Outreach Press, 2001.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

8

Center, Horace Mann Learning, ed. Reviewing applications for discretionary grants and cooperative agreements: A workbook for application reviewers. [Washington, D.C.?]: Horace Mann Learning Center, 1988.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

9

Center, Horace Mann Learning. Reviewing applications for discretionary grants and cooperative agreements: A workbook for application reviewers. Washington, D.C.?]: Horace Mann Learning Center, U.S. Department of Education, 1991.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

10

S, Frankel Mark, e Cave Jane, eds. Evaluating science and scientists: An east-west dialogue on research evaluation in post-communist Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press, 1997.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

11

Shestopal, A. V., e V. I. Konnov. Sot︠s︡ialʹno-politicheskai︠a︡ funkt︠s︡ii︠a︡ nat︠s︡ionalʹnykh nauchnykh fondov: Sbornik nauchnykh stateĭ. Moskva: Izdatelʹstvo "MGIMO-Universitet", 2016.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

12

1956-, Evans Martyn, ed. A decent proposal: Ethical review of clinical research. New York, N.Y: Wiley, 1996.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

13

D, Muraskin Lana, United States. National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board e Educational Resources Information Center (U.S.), eds. Strengthening the standards: Recommendations for OERI peer review : summary report, draft January 30, 1999. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Dept. of Education, National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board, 1999.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

14

Badji, Toure Lalla, e African Development Foundation, eds. Mobilizing the grassroots for community health: An ADF research reader. Washington, D.C. (1400 Eye St., N.W., 10th floor, Washington 20005): African Development Foundation, 1995.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

15

D, Muraskin Lana, August and Associates e United States. National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board, eds. Strengthening the standards: Recommendations for OERI Peer Review : summary report prepared for the National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board. Washington, DC (80 F St., NW, Washington 20208-7564): The Board, 1999.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

16

Badji, Toure Lalla, e African Development Foundation (U.S.), eds. Mobilizing the grassroots for community health: An ADF research reader. Washington, D.C. (1400 Eye St., N.W., 10th floor, Washington 20005): African Development Foundation, 1995.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

17

National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program., ed. Peer review in the Department of Energy, Office of Science and Technology: Interim report. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1997.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

18

National Institutes of Health (U.S.), ed. NIH peer review of research grant applications. [Bethesda, Md.]: Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institites of Health, 1987.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

19

National Institutes of Health (U.S.), ed. NIH peer review of research grant applications. [Bethesda, Md.]: Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1988.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

20

Office, General Accounting. Department of Education grant award. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1992.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

21

Office, General Accounting. Department of Education grant award. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1992.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

22

Share your expertise with us. [Bethesda, Md.]: National Cancer Institute, 2002.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

23

(Editor), Mark S. Frankel, e Jane Cave (Editor), eds. Evaluating Science and Scientists: An East-West Dialogue on Research Evaluation in Post-Communist Europe. A Central European University Press Book, 1997.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

24

Learning Anytime Anywhere Partnerships: Information & application materials : deadline for submissions: April 2, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, 1999.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

25

Final report. Washington, D.C: National Science Foundation, 1986.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

26

Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth. McFarland & Company, Incorporated Publishers, 2012.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

27

Dogmatism in science and medicine: How dominant theories monopolize research and stifle the search for truth. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland & Co., 2012.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

28

(US), National Research Council, e Committee on the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology's Peer Review Program. Peer Review in the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology: Interim Report. National Academies Press, 1997.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

29

Peach, Ken. Reviewing Research, Making Proposals and Evaluating Science. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796077.003.0011.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This chapter focuses on the review process, the process of writing a proposal and the evaluation of science. The usual way that science is funded these days is through a proposal to a funding agency; if it satisfies peer review and there are sufficient resources available, it is then funded. Peer review is at the heart of academic life, and is used to assess research proposals, progress, publications and institutions. Peer review processes are discussed and, in light of this discussion, the art of proposal writing. The particular features of making fellowship proposals and preparing for an institutional review are described. In addition, several of the methods used for evaluating and ranking research and research institutions are reviewed, including the Research Assessment Exercise and the Research Excellence Framework.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

30

Spyns, Peter, e Maria-Esther Vidal. Научное рецензирование. Лучшие практики и рекомендации. Editado por Elena Tikhonova e Olga Kirillova. Eco-Vector, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/spr202101.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This booklet aims to tackle this problem by providing a practical introduction to the practice of peer reviewing. Although it mainly focuses on paper reviewing for scientific events in the domain of computer science and (business) informatics, many of the principles, tips, tricks, and examples are generalizable to journal reviewing and other scientific domains. Some of the principles and tips can also be applied when reviewing proposals for research projects or grants. In addition, many aspects of this booklet will also benefit authors of scientific papers (even outside computer science) as they will gain more insight into how papers are reviewed and hence where they have to pay attention to when writing their papers.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

31

Cho, Jeasik. Evaluating Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199330010.001.0001.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This book provides the qualitative research community with some insight on how to evaluate the quality of qualitative research. This topic has gained little attention during the past few decades. We, qualitative researchers, read journal articles, serve on masters’ and doctoral committees, and also make decisions on whether conference proposals, manuscripts, or large-scale grant proposals should be accepted or rejected. It is assumed that various perspectives or criteria, depending on various paradigms, theories, or fields of discipline, have been used in assessing the quality of qualitative research. Nonetheless, until now, no textbook has been specifically devoted to exploring theories, practices, and reflections associated with the evaluation of qualitative research. This book constructs a typology of evaluating qualitative research, examines actual information from websites and qualitative journal editors, and reflects on some challenges that are currently encountered by the qualitative research community. Many different kinds of journals’ review guidelines and available assessment tools are collected and analyzed. Consequently, core criteria that stand out among these evaluation tools are presented. Readers are invited to join the author to confidently proclaim: “Fortunately, there are commonly agreed, bold standards for evaluating the goodness of qualitative research in the academic research community. These standards are a part of what is generally called ‘scientific research.’ ”

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

32

Boyer-Kassem, Thomas, Conor Mayo-Wilson e Michael Weisberg, eds. Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190680534.001.0001.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Descartes once argued that, with sufficient effort and skill, a single scientist could uncover fundamental truths about our world. Contemporary science proves the limits of this claim. From synthesizing the human genome to predicting the effects of climate change, some current scientific research requires the collaboration of hundreds (if not thousands) of scientists with various specializations. Additionally, the majority of published scientific research is now coauthored, including more than 80% of articles in the natural sciences. Small collaborative teams have become the norm in science. This is the first volume to address critical philosophical questions about how collective scientific research could be organized differently and how it should be organized. For example, should scientists be required to share knowledge with competing research teams? How can universities and grant-giving institutions promote successful collaborations? When hundreds of researchers contribute to a discovery, how should credit be assigned—and can minorities expect a fair share? When collaborative work contains significant errors or fraudulent data, who deserves blame? In this collection of essays, leading philosophers of science address these critical questions, among others. Their work extends current philosophical research on the social structure of science and contributes to the growing, interdisciplinary field of social epistemology. The volume’s strength lies in the diversity of its authors’ methodologies. Employing detailed case studies of scientific practice, mathematical models of scientific communities, and rigorous conceptual analysis, contributors to this volume study scientific groups of all kinds, including small labs, peer-review boards, and large international collaborations like those in climate science and particle physics.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

33

Martinho Belchior, Alirio, Carlos Mascarenhas, Maha Othman, Marília Rua, Mari Takashima, Marta Silva, Laila Albalushi et al. iNURSING JOURNAL - Manual for Authors: The step-by-step instructions guide. International Nursing School Ltd., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.52457/qprz4666.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

The iNursing Journal (iNJ) is the official journal of the International Nursing School (INS) and intends to disseminate the evidence-based nursing and health care, contributing to the advancement of relevant knowledge in the fields of clinic, management, education, research, advice, as well as to support decisions in public policies. The iNJ is an international journal that intends to receive proposals for publication from over the world, defending cultural diversity, as well as a diversity of contexts and of theoretical-methodological approaches that inform professionals, users, and political stakeholders for their decision-making. The articles published in iNJ must make clear their international knowledge translation and show a critical-reflective, scientific, theoretical and culturally sensitive approach. Although iNJ is mainly dedicated to research in nursing and health sciences, there are no restrictions on articles’ authorship, if they fit the requirements and format of the iNJ. In fact, the iNJ addresses and welcomes articles in health sciences and nursing. The journal publishes randomized trials, observational studies, qualitative research, systematic reviews, scoping reviews, among others. All articles submitted will be subject to double-blind peer review. The iNJ has an Editorial Team headed by the Editor-in-Chief that additionally has the assistance of the Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Editorial Team Members, and Reviewers. The Editorial Team in addition, is supported by an Office Administrator. Members of the Editorial Team meet regularly to evaluate the iNJ progress and to discuss overall goals. The frequency of the Editorial Team meetings varies and depends on the specific needs of the journal. In the following sections, we start to explain the Article Submission Guidelines, including the rules, bibliographic reference standards and article submission process. Followed by the Article Preparation section, that incorporates the different documents that must be submitted, including the Author consent and terms agreement that must be duly read, fulfilled and signed, and also give examples of checklists that can be used to prepare your article for submission. Finally, we present the iNJ Ethics Statement, Duties and Policies.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Oferecemos descontos em todos os planos premium para autores cujas obras estão incluídas em seleções literárias temáticas. Contate-nos para obter um código promocional único!