Índice
Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Muhammadiyah (Organization). Majlis Tarjih"
Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos
Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Muhammadiyah (Organization). Majlis Tarjih".
Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.
Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Muhammadiyah (Organization). Majlis Tarjih"
1
Fanani, Ahwan. "Moderasi Pemikiran Fikih Hubungan Antarumat Beragama di Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid Muhammadiyah". SHAHIH : Journal of Islamicate Multidisciplinary 2, n.º 1 (21 de junho de 2017): 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v2i1.705.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Muhammadiyah is credited as moderate islamic organization due to its long and familiar encounter with national and social issues in Indonesia. The question on how Muhammadiyah position on the issues of religious relationship and on how Muhammadiyah formulates its view on the issue lead to the question on religious opinion produced by official body of Muhammadiyah that is in charge to give answer. The formulation of Muhammadiyah’s stance related to the relationship between moslems and nonmoslems is under authority of Majelis Tarjih and Tajdid (MTT), formal board in Muhammadiyah issuing fatwas or religious opinions related to religious and social problems faced by Muhammadiyah’s members. From this board’s decisions, the official stance of Muhammadiyah can be analyzed using the spectacle of moderatism. Muhammadyah has two different stances in dealing with religious issues. It has clear and relatively strict position on akida (belief) and ibada (ritual) but it has loose and open position in muamala (daily relationship) to other people. However, Muhammadiyah develops broader approach in understanding Islamic text and accepting more diverse legal sources, such as sadd dzariah and maslahah. In sum, the stance of Muhammadiyah to the relationship between moslems with other religious people will be influenced by the division between akida-ibada and muamalah aspects, which it will be more flexible to the later. This divison enables it to develop more moderat view or legal opinion related to the relationship between moslems and other religious people.
2
ZULIAN, PRADANA BOY. "THE MODERATE PATH OF ISLAMIC LEGAL THOUGHT: THE CASE OF MUHAMMADIYAH IN INDONESIA". Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 3, n.º 5 (14 de outubro de 2022): 75–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v3i5.164.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The religious moderation is a newly introduced discourse in Indonesian Islam context. This movement is aimed at moderating extreme practices of Islam and religion in general. Muhammadiyah, one major Islamic movement in Indonesia is known for its moderate and modern inclination. However, as Muhammadiyah is also known as the movement of Islamic reformation which to some extent is often connected to purification, some identifications of Muhammadiyah as a non-moderate movement prevails. This article shows that Muhammadiyah is a modern and moderate Islamic organization. In order to proof this claim, this paper analyses one document produced by Majelis Tarjih Muhammadiyah, a council within the organization of Muhammadiyah responsible for responding novel issues within the realm of Islamic law in particular, and Islamic thought in general. The document called Risalah Akhlak Filosofis or Treatise on Philosophical Ethics which was issued in 2020 as the result of the council congress. Using the moderation theoretical framework, analysis of the treatise proofs that Muhammadiyah is a moderate Islamic religious movement, in two contexts, theoretical and practical. Moreover, in Muhammadiyah context, moderation is comprehended in two meanings, namely moderation in the meaning of balance and anti or avoiding extremism. In this sense, moderation can be seen through the explanation in the treatise which emphasizes the importance of placing roles in various contexts. Furthermore, moderation in Muhammadiyah’s thought can also be seen in its unwillingness to take advantage of other people’s thoughts. In this case, Muhammadiyah shows its tendency of moderation through dialogue of thought between civilizations.
3
Kamal, Mustopa, e Ayi Ishak Sholih Muchtar. "The Pattern of Nahdlatul Ulama’s Ijtihad". Istinbath | Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam 15, n.º 2 (21 de janeiro de 2017): 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.36667/istinbath.v15i2.24.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
In line with the socio-religious dynamics in society, various problems surrounding fiqh have also developed, most of which have not been absorbed in the legal thinking of the scholars. Concerning issues commonly referred to as masa’il fiqhiyyah al-hadithah, scholars have institutional mechanisms to solve these problems. Nahdlatul Ulama, the most prominent Islamic religious organization in the country, is also concerned with masa’il fiqhiyyah al-hadithah through the Bahtsul Masa’il (BM-NU) mechanism. However, the BM-NU legal istinbath framework is unique, because it is different from the legal istinbath framework that previous scholars had—such as the legal istinbath framework used by Abu Hanifah and Muhammad Ibn Idris al-Syafi’i, also different from the legal istinbath framework with mass organizations. Other Indonesian Islam—such as the legal istinbath framework of the Persis Hisbah Council and the legal istinbath framework of Majlis Tarjih and the Development of Muhammadiyah Islamic Thought. The uniqueness is mainly because the legal istinbath framework adopted by BM-NU tends to present themselves as muttabi’ ulama and does not present themselves as mujtahid clerics as is generally understood by fuqahâ.
4
Muhaimin, Abdul Wafi. "IJTIHAD ‘VIRTUAL’ DAN FIQIH CORONA: RESPON ULAMA INDONESIA DI MUSIM PANDEMI". Hikmah: Journal of Islamic Studies 16, n.º 2 (29 de dezembro de 2020): 167. http://dx.doi.org/10.47466/hikmah.v16i2.173.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Abstract
Covid-19 has been announced as global pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO). All countries, including Indonesia, implemented the health protocols in preventing the spread of viruses. Among those protocols is social distancing either in lockdown or physical distancing. This policy disrupted the life order and habit, especially in religious ritual. The religious problems should be answered by the ulamas for the law certainty. In the normal situation, the discussion on fatwa is usually held by collective ijtihad (Ijtihad Jama’i). This way is done by MUI and its fatwa commission, NU and Its Bahtsul Masail, Muhammadiyah and Its Majlis Tarjih. Unfortunately, in covid-9 pandemic, the meeting for collective ijtihad is not easy to do because of the healthy protocol. Instead of that, the discussion to determine fatwa should be done as responding religious problems, but by virtual ijtihad via Zoom and others application, such as whatsapp groups. Therefore, this article discuss about the way ulamas responds the law-religious problems during Covid-19 pandemic.
Abstrak
Covid-19 telah ditetapkan sebagai pandemi global oleh World Health Organization (WHO) sehingga berbagai negara, termasuk Indonesia, menetapkan protokol kesehatan dalam upaya pencegahan penyebaran virus ini. Salah satunya adalah dengan melakukan social distancing baik dengan cara lockdown maupun hanya dengan melakukan physical distancing. Kebijakan ini tentu berpengaruh terhadap tatanan kehidupan manusia, termasuk dalam ritual keagamaan. Tentu persoalan keagamaan harus mendapatkan jawaban dari para ulama agar umat mendapatkan kepastian hukum. Problemnya adalah, setiap persoalan hukum biasanya dalam kondisi normal dilakukan dengan cara kolektif (ijtihad jama’i), baik yang dilakukan oleh MUI dengan komisi fatwanya, NU dengan Lembaga Bahtsul Masailnya, Muhammadiyah dengan Majlis Tarjihnya, dan ormas-ormas lainnya. Namun dalam kondisi seperti sekarang ini (masa pandemi Covid-19) tentu tidak mudah untuk dilakukan. Maka muncullah terobosan baru dengan cara memaksimalkan kecanggihan teknologi, sehingga persoalan keummatan tetap bisa direspon dengan baik melalui ijtihad ‘virtual’, baik dengan cara melalui aplikasi Zoom maupun melalui chatting dengan memaksimalkan group-group Whatsapp (WAG). Oleh karena itu, kajian ini akan membahas tentang bagaimana para kyai (ulama) merespons persoalan hukum selama pandemi Covid-19.
5
Ulya, Nurun Najmatul, e Ahmad Yasir Amrulloh. "Analisa Metodologi Tafsir Al-Quran Berbasis Ormas di Indonesia Perspektif Metodologi Islah Gusmian". Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir 2, n.º 1 (30 de março de 2023): 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v2i1.34.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
This article examines Indonesian commentary books compiled by Indonesian Community Organizations (ORMAS) or their representatives, namely Tafsir Al-Wa'ie Selected Verses by Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia and Tafsir At-Tanwir by Majlis Tarjih and Tajdid PP Muhammadiyah. The type of research method is library research, because the source of the analysis is based on library data, namely the work of interpretation by the two ORMAS and the formulation of the methodology developed by Islah Gusmian, "New Directions of Study Methodology on Al-Qur'an Interpretation." In particular, the 11 variables Gusmian analyzed to dissect Indonesian commentary works. Namely: (1) the systematic presentation of the interpretation (2) the form of presentation of the interpretation (3) the style of language in which the interpretation is written (4) the form of writing the interpretation (5) the nature of the commentator (6) the scholarship of the interpreter (7) the origins of the commentary literature (8) the sources reference sources (9) Interpretation method (10) nuances of interpretation (11) interpretation approach. After conducting a study of the two interpretations, it was concluded that the methodology used by these two ORMAS interpretation books has similarities and differences. The similarities can be seen in the systematic presentation of interpretations, forms of presentation, forms of writing, style of language, origins of literature, sources of reference, nuances of interpretation and approach. Meanwhile, the other three variables, namely the nature of the interpreter, the knowledge of the interpreter, and the method of interpretation show different results. For this reason, similar research can be developed to dissect the works of Archipelago interpretations in Indonesia, so that the methodology used will add variants to the treasures of Nusantara interpretation studies.
6
Norcahyono, Norcahyono, e Ariyadi Ariyadi. "Pandangan Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Tengah Tentang Tindakan Euthanasia Dalam Pendidikan Waris Islam". Tunas: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar 5, n.º 1 (27 de dezembro de 2019): 50–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.33084/tunas.v5i1.1192.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif yang bersifat deskriptif kualitatif. Yang pengumpulan datanya dilakukan melalui kajian dari berbagai literatur dan juga dari berbagai pendapat majlis tarjih Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Tengah. Setelah pengumpulan dan pengolahan data, kemudian dilakukan analisis kualitatif. Penelitian yang ada dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian hukum normatif adalah penelitian hukum yang meletakkan hukum sebagai sebuah bagian sistem norma. Sistem norma yang dimaksud adalah mengenai asas-asas, norma kaidah, dari peraturan perundangan, putusan pengadilan, perjanjian serta doktrin (ajaran). Serta tempat penelitian adalah di Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini menurut analisis peneliti Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya tidak memberikan putusan tetapi mereka memberikan pandangan terhadap tindakan eutanasia ditinjau dari hukum waris Islam memiliki beberapa kesimpulan sebagai berikut: 1. Mereka bersepakat hukum umum euthanasia (Aktif) adalah haram apapun alasanya. 2. Pelaku euthanasia tidak mendapatkan harta waris dari orang yang dibunuh. 3. Eeuthanasia (pasif) hukumnya boleh. 4. Mereka berselisih pendapat tentang bagaimana hukum orang yang membunuh si yang terbunuh yang mendapat maaf dari keluarga dengan bersedia membayar fidyad (Denda) apakah mendapat warisan atau tidak.
7
Fikri, Yudistia Teguh Ali, Ida Abdul Gopar, Esty Faatinisa e Mochamad Faizal Almaududi Azis Dachlan. "MENGENAL METODE ISTINBATH HUKUM MAJELIS TARJIH MUHAMMADIYAH". FASTABIQ: JURNAL STUDI ISLAM 3, n.º 2 (22 de junho de 2022): 94–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.47281/fas.v3i2.120.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
This article introduces the legal istinbath method of the tarjih muhammadiyah council. The tarjih council was born in the decision of the Pekalongan congress in 1927 the function to consider and resolve all problems that arise is debated by Muhammadiyah people to know the opinion chosen because it is bold and its postulates based on the Qur'an and As-Sunnah. This article aims to find out how the istinbath method used by Muhammadiyah in establishing law, using a qualitative approach, by adding data from secondary data sources, previous research, or existing data in organizations or agencies. The istinbath tarjih muhammadiyah method is based on the Al-Quran and As-Sunnah, The ijtihad method with Bayani, Burhani, and Irfani Muhammadiyah approaches solves problems that occur in society.Keywords: Istinbath, Islamic Law, Tarjih Council, Muhammadiyah
8
Haq, Muh Al-Fatih Izzul, Nazhif Ali Murtadho, Piston Yunan Setyo e Sivana Amanda Diamita Syndo. "Praktik Ajaran Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah". Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum 2, n.º 1 (2 de fevereiro de 2021): 89–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.15642/mal.v2i1.83.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Abstract: Islamic organizations become a forum for channeling aspirations in society. In its development in Indonesia, two Islamic organizations are mostly followed by the community, namely Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and Muhammadiyah. In the practice of the teachings of the two Islamic organizations which are both based on ahlus sunah wal jamaah, there are slight differences. This writing was made to know the history of the development of the Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah organizations, the typical teaching practices of Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah, the background and concept of Bahsul Masail Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah Tarjih Council. By using the scientific method (based on facts, analysis results, and existing theories) it can be concluded that: First, Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah are organizations based on the concept of ahlus sunah wal jamaah which were formed during the national movement as a forum for people's aspirations. Second, in practice, NU teachings also follow the opinion of a mazhab ulama, whereas Muhammadiyah only adheres to the Koran and hadith. Third, Bahsul Masail is a form of NU's distinctive scientific tradition which discusses problems in society from the perspective of the pesantren. Fourth, the Tarjih Council is an institution under the auspices of Muhammadiyah that deals with khilafiyah issues and also issues for which there are no legal provisions that regulate in the Koran and Sunnah. Keywords: Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, Bahsul Masail, Tarjih Council. Abstrak: Organisasi Islam menjadi suatu wadah dalam penyaluran aspirasi yang ada di masyarakat. Dalam perkembangannya di Indonesia terdapat dua organisasi Islam yang mayoritas diikuti oleh masyarakat, yakni Nahdlatul ulama (NU) dan Muhammadiyah. Dalam praktik ajaran dua organisasi Islam yang sama-sama berlandaskan pada ahlus sunah wal jamaah ini terdapat sedikit perbedaan. Penulisan ini dibuat dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui sejarah perkembangan organisasi Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah, praktik ajaran Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah, belakang dan konsep Bahsul Masail Nahdlatul Ulama, dan Majelis Tarjih Muhammadiyah. Dengan menggunakan metode ilmiah (berdasarkan fakta, hasil analisis, serta teori yang ada) dapat disimpulkan bahwasanya: Pertama, Nahdlatul ulama dan Muhammadiyah merupakan organisasi berasaskan paham ahlus sunah wal jamaah yang dibentuk dalam masa pergerakan nasional sebagai wadah aspirasi rakyat. Kedua, Dalam praktik ajaran NU juga mengikuti pendapat suatu ulama madhzab sedangkan Muhammadiyah hanya berpegang pada al-Qur'an dan hadis. Ketiga, Bahsul Masail merupakan suatu bentuk tradisi keilmuan khas NU yang di dalamnya membahas permasalahan-permasalahan di masyarakat dalam perspektif pesantren. Keempat, Majelis Tarjih merupakan suatu lembaga di bawah naungan Muhammadiyah yang menangani persoalan khilafiyah dan juga masalah yang belum ada ketentuan hukum yang mengatur di dalam al-Qur'an dan Sunnah. Kata kunci: Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, Bahsul Masail, Majelis Tarjih.
9
Musoffa, Azzam, Bouhedda Ghalia e Muntaha Artalim Zaim. "Five Cases of Fatwa’s Change in Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah". Transformatif 7, n.º 1 (30 de abril de 2023): 59–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.23971/tf.v7i1.6067.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The purpose of this study is to understand the change of fatwa produced by Majlis Tarjih of Muhammadiyah Association from between their first establishment in 1927 until 2019. The study about the change of fatwa produced by them considered as important study for it may affect the life of not less than 10 million members of Muhammadiyah directly or indirectly. The board has announced 16 methods used in weighting issues including their confirmation of the probability of fatwa to be changed, it made the researcher curious for whether they can keep their own methods or not in case the fatwa has been changed. The researcher has used two methods in answering the problem; the first is analysis method, and it is used to analyze the collected fatwa from books and magazines produced by Majlis Tarjih. After analyzing the change of fatwa, the researcher tried to approach the change of fatwa from the view of Islamic jurisprudential maxims and Islamic control fundamentalist to know whether the cause of change is suitable to Islamic principle or not. The researcher has collected five changes of fatwa produced by them, and they are; 1) Considering matlak to determine the beginning of Arafah fasting, 2) bank’s interest, 3) Hanging the picture, 4) Smoking, 5) and using sitr (cover). The researcher has obtained number of findings; the most important of them is the fact that the change of fatwa in the cases mentioned were following their own methods and were suitable to Islamic principle
10
Safriadi, Safriadi. "Penggunaan Qawā’id Fiqhiyyah sebagai Metodologi Istinbat Hukm oleh Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah dan Lajnah Bahsul Masail (LBM) Nahdhatul Ulama (NU)". BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam 5, n.º 1 (12 de abril de 2024): 196–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v5i1.1112.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah has an important role and position in the legal discovery process by the Tarjih Council and LBM NU, as stated in the framework of the Majlis Tarjih and LBM NU. This research focuses on answering 2 important things, 1) the use of the Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah mechanism as a methodological argument, 2) the contribution of Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah to contemporary legal discoveries in Lajnah Bahsul Masail (LBM) Nahdhatul Ulama (NU) and Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah. This research is an analytical and qualitative descriptive research with a logical philosophical and empirical approach. The results are first. The mechanism for using Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah as methodological proof is carried out by linking (Ilḥāq) a new case with an old case that already has a legal answer under the basis of Qawā’id Fiqhiyyah . Second, the contribution of Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah in the discovery of contemporary law in the LBM as a reinforcement for the decisions taken, is used as supporting evidence, especially since tanẓīr and ilḥāq are needed to develop the insight of Fiqh, but if the main evidence is that no legal answers are found, Meanwhile, Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah contribusion the Muhammadiyah Tarjih Council is the main evidence for finding/istinbāṭ law. From these two institutions it can be analyzed that Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah is used and required in legal istinbāt, but the proportion is still supporting the main evidence.
Livros sobre o assunto "Muhammadiyah (Organization). Majlis Tarjih"
1
Djamil, Fathurrahman. Metode ijtihad Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah. Jakarta: Logos Pub. House, 1995.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
2
Rahman, Asjmuni A. Laporan penelitian Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah: Suatu studi tentang sistem dan metode penentuan hukum. Yogyakarta: Proyek Pembinaan Perguruan Tinggi Agama, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, 1985.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
3
Abdurrahman, Asjmuni. Manhaj tarjih Muhammadiyah: Metodologi dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2002.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
4
Zulbaedah. Keputusan Majlis Tarjih Muhammadiyah tentang zakat profesi: Laporan penelitian. Bandung: Lembaga Penelitian, IAIN Sunan Gunung Djati, 2000.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
5
Mulkhan, Abdul Munir. Masalah-masalah teologi dan fiqh dalam Tarjih Muhammadiyah. Yogyakarta: Sipress, 1994.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
6
Hadi, Abd. Studi hasil Munas Majlis Tarjih dan Tajdid Muhammadiyah tentang haramnya bunga bank di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, April 2010 dan sikap para pelaku ekonomi warga Muhammadiyah terhadapnya: Laporan penelitian individual. Surabaya: Fakultas Syari'ah, IAIN Sunan Ampel, 2010.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte