Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Mons, Battle of, 1944"
Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos
Índice
Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Mons, Battle of, 1944".
Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.
Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Mons, Battle of, 1944"
BIZOT, A., T. QUATRESOLS, A. JURY e C. CINO. "Les Rochambelles". Médecine et Armées Vol.49 No.3, Volume 49, Numéro 3 (18 de setembro de 2023): 81–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.17184/eac.7906.
Texto completo da fonteZoric, Mirjana. "1944 Battle of Serbia". Vojno delo 66, n.º 3 (2014): 266–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1403266z.
Texto completo da fonteBreeze, Andrew. "Historia Brittonum and Arthur's Battle of Mons Agned". Northern History 40, n.º 1 (março de 2003): 167–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/007817203792207960.
Texto completo da fonteCampbell, Duncan B. "A NOTE ON THE BATTLE OF MONS GRAUPIUS". Classical Quarterly 65, n.º 1 (2 de abril de 2015): 407–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009838814000743.
Texto completo da fonteUrquhart, Brian, Martin Middlebrook e Peter Harclerode. "Arnhem 1944: The Airborne Battle." Journal of Military History 59, n.º 2 (abril de 1995): 358. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2944604.
Texto completo da fonteHill, J. Michael, Gordon Maxwell, Norman Macdougall e Peter Donald. "A Battle Lost: Romans and Caledonians at Mons Graupius." Journal of Military History 56, n.º 4 (outubro de 1992): 689. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1986171.
Texto completo da fonteFrere, S. S., e G. S. Maxwell. "A Battle Lost: Romans and Caledonians at Mons Graupius". Britannia 22 (1991): 340. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/526661.
Texto completo da fonteGilliver, Catherine M. "Mons Graupius and the Role of Auxiliaries in Battle". Greece and Rome 43, n.º 1 (abril de 1996): 54–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gr/43.1.54.
Texto completo da fonteGoldberg, Harold J. "The Battle for Leningrad, 1941–1944". History: Reviews of New Books 31, n.º 4 (janeiro de 2003): 139–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03612750309602051.
Texto completo da fonteCallahan, Raymond. "The Battle of Normandy 1944 (review)". Journal of Military History 67, n.º 3 (2003): 978–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jmh.2003.0206.
Texto completo da fonteTeses / dissertações sobre o assunto "Mons, Battle of, 1944"
Blanchette, C. Scott (Crispin Scott). "Re-examining the Battle of the Bulge : Assessing the Role of Strategic Intelligence and Coalition Warfare Against the 1944 Wehrmacht". Thesis, University of North Texas, 1998. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc278607/.
Texto completo da fonteReader, Darrell Ray. "Weaponized Nature: How the Environment Saved the Allies at Bastogne, December 16-23, 1944". Thesis, University of North Texas, 2019. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1538767/.
Texto completo da fonteFlint, E. R. "The Development of British civil affairs and its employment in the British sector of allied military operations during the Battle of Normandy, June to August 1944". Thesis, Department of Applied Science, Security and Resilience, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1826/4017.
Texto completo da fonteKatz, David Brock. "Sidi Rezegh and Tobruk : two South African military disasters revisited 1941-1942". Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/96040.
Texto completo da fonteENGLISH ABSTRACT: Sidi Rezegh and Tobruk are the largest disasters suffered by South Africa in its military history. Yet, despite their enormity, Sidi Rezegh and Tobruk are little understood and hardly remembered. South Africa declared war on Germany on the 6 September 1939, after a bitter internal debate, amounting to a conflict between Afrikaner nationalists and those who supported the British Empire. South Africa’s political ambivalence and disunity ran parallel to her unpreparedness for war in every important department from the lack of vital coastal defences to the miniscule size of her army and air force and complete lack of a navy. The first six months of 1941 saw the South Africans play a significant part in completely defeating the Italian colonial forces in East Africa. However, the campaign was poor preparation for what the South Africans were to encounter in the North African Desert months later. South African troops spent their time rebuilding fortifications in Egypt rather than in essential training to acclimatise this “bush war” army to harsh desert conditions. In a reluctant political decision, the unprepared South Africans were committed to Operation Crusader. The inexperienced South Africans met up with the battle hardened Afrika Korps at Sidi Rezegh on 23 November 1941 and were annihilated in the face of overwhelming odds. In revisiting this forgotten battle, it has been found, using primary and secondary sources, that the South Africans extracted an enormous price on the German armour in what may have been the true turning point of Operation Crusader. In May 1942, Rommel’s Afrika Korps sallied forth in a series of lightning moves that demonstrated the Axis grip on combined operations and managed to isolate the vital port of Tobruk commanded by an inexperienced South African, Major General H. B. Klopper. His surrender in one day is often compared to the previous siege endured under similar circumstances, where the Australians managed to hold Rommel at bay for 244 days until the siege was lifted. Klopper’s surrender of Tobruk resulted in a political crisis for Winston Churchill and for Jan Smuts, as the fiasco caused considerable tension within the Allied camp and within South Africa. On re-examination, interesting facts have emerged from the primary source material, as to the state of the Tobruk defences and of its unfortunate commander and how the United Kingdom, acting in concert with South Africa, sought to suppress the true facts. Immediate post-war memory has been shaped and distorted by sensitive political considerations that affected relations between South Africa and the United Kingdom. Thereafter, the memory of Sidi Rezegh and Tobruk was relegated first by a nationalistic Afrikaner government and then since by a democratically elected government, both of which have seen very little use in incorporating these two milestones into the national memory.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Sidi Rezegh en Tobruk is die grootste nederlae wat Suid-Afrika in sy militêre geskiedenis ervaar het. Ten spyte van hul omvang, word daar min van Sidi Rezegh en Tobruk verstaan of onthou. Na ‘n hewige interne debat wat tot konflik tussen Afrikanernasionaliste en pro-Britse Suid-Afrikaners gelei het, het Suid-Afrika op 6 September 1939 oorlog teen Duitsland verklaar. Suid-Afrika se politieke verdeeldheid het saamgeval met die Unie se totale onvoorbereidheid vir oorlog, wat gestrek het van kritieke tekortkominge in kusverdediging, tot die ontoereikende grootte van die leër en lugmag en die totale afwesigheid van ‘n vloot. Gedurende die eerste ses maande van 1941 het Suid-Afrika ‘n beduidende rol gespeel om die Italiaanse koloniale magte in Oos-Afrika te verslaan. Dié veldtog was egter nie effektiewe voorbereiding vir die uitdagings waarteen die Suid-Afrikaners kort daarna in Noord-Afrika te staan sou kom nie. Die Suid-Afrikaanse troepe het daarby hul tyd daaraan bestee om vestings in Egipte te herbou in plaas daarvan om noodsaaklike opleiding te ondergaan om hul “bosoorlog”-leër vir ruwe woestynoorlogvoering voor te berei. ‘n Huiwerige, teensinnige politieke besluit het die onvoorbereide Suid-Afrikaners tot Operasie Crusader verbind. Die onervare Suid-Afrikaners het op 23 November 1941 by Sidi Rezegh teen die geharde Afrika Korps te staan gekom, waar oorweldigende magte hulle verpletter het. ‘n Heroorweging van hierdie vergete veldslag aan die hand van primêre en sekondêre bronne het aan die lig gebring dat die Suid-Afrikaners ‘n hoë tol van die Duitse pantser geëis het, wat besmoontlik die ware keerpunt in Operasie Crusader gebring het. In Mei 1942 het Rommel se Afrika Korps deur ‘n reeks blitsige bewegings wat die greep van die Spilmagte op gekombineerde operasies gedemonstreer het, daarin geslaag om die kritiese hawe van Tobruk, waar die onervare Suid Afrikaanse generaal-majoor H.B. Klopper in bevel was, te isoleer. Sy oorgawe binne ‘n enkele dag word dikwels vergelyk met die vorige beleg van Tobruk toe die Australianers Rommel onder vergelykbare omstandighede vir 244 dae teruggehou het totdat die beleg opgehef is. Klopper se oorgawe het ‘n politieke krisis vir Winston Churchill en Jan Smuts geskep, deurdat dit aansienlike spanning binne sowel die Gealieerde kamp as Suid-Afrika veroorsaak het. Die herevaluering van die gebeure het interessante feite uit die primêre bronne na vore gebring ten opsigte van die toestand van Tobruk se verdedigingstellings, die ongelukkige bevelvoerder, en hoe die Verenigde Koninkryk in samewerking met Suid-Afrika die ware feite wou toesmeer. Die onmiddellike naoorlogse geheuebeeld van die gebeure by Sidi Rezegh en Tobruk is geskep en verwring deur sensitiewe politieke oorwegings wat die verhouding tussen Suid-Afrika en die Verenigde Koninkryk beïnvloed het. Sedertdien het ‘n nasionalistiese Afrikaner-regering en daarna ook die demokraties-verkose, post-apartheid-regering die herinneringe aan Sidi Rezegh en Tobruk tot die vergetelheid verdoem; nie een van die twee het die nut daarvan gesien om dié twee mylpale in die nasionale geheue te verewig nie. Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za
Tsou, Tsun-Lung, e 鄒琮隆. "A Research on Battle of Henan-Hunan-Guangxi in 1944". Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/59v57n.
Texto completo da fonte國立中央大學
歷史研究所在職專班
105
Since the war between China and Japan in 1937, under the guidance of the Japanese political and strategic, under the guidance of the strategy, the use of its superior soldiers,combat power launched an attack on China, its purpose in addition to plundering resources, but also to force to yield, the United States, Britain And other countries to ensure the interests of China and the Pacific Southwest islands on the war resources. Therefore, Japan in the "militarism" situation of the situation by force to plunder the "East Asia war" from this start. The attack on Pearl Harbor made the Japanese army in the early days of victory and fruitful victories, but the embargo measures, the US military war on the Japanese and the battlefield, the Japanese lost a lot of sea, air combat power, can not ensure "absolute defense." The Japanese army, the Japanese army, was deployed by the Chinese troops on the Chinese battlefield to carry out the destruction of the mainland, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, Air Force Base for the purpose of the "battle of Henan and Henan", after the "tiger command" deduction results can not complete the combat needs,still do their best in April 1944 launched operations. (Henan battle) and Gui-liang battle(Guangxi battle) and other three major operations for the study of the main axis, and military theory of the field of strategic view of the view, both sides with the military management then. Finally, although the Japanese army in December 1944 to open up the mainland transport line and destroy its occupation area of the air force base, to complete the operational set of strategic objectives, but this time the Japanese army by the US military in the Pacific is lands ounterattack, can not ensure that the "Southern Resources "And to fail.
Gonçalves, Carlos da Silveira. "Adriano de Sousa Lopes (1879-1944). Um pintor na Grande Guerra". Doctoral thesis, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/18445.
Texto completo da fonteThis thesis studies the period of the Great War and his aftermath in the life and work of Portuguese painter Adriano de Sousa Lopes. He was the only official war artist of the Portuguese Expeditionary Corps (CEP) in France, appointed in August 1917. First we discuss his motivations, the objectives he proposed to the War Minister Norton de Matos and his unique experience at the front. Focusing on the works of art and unpublished documents, this study examines the many facets of the war artist – the captain and chief of CEP’s Artistic Service, the draughtsman, the etcher, the painter – and proposes an interpretation of his most ambitious projects: the Portuguese section in the Allied Room at the Musée de l’Armée, in Paris and, most crucial, the conception of the Great War Rooms at the Military Museum of Lisbon, where seven of his monumental canvases were installed. This research reveals for the first time the dispute over the Lisbon rooms between the artist and the museum’s direction and its problematic results. It analyzes also the unknown collaboration of Sousa Lopes in decorating the war cemeteries in France and in the Panthéon de la Guerre, a colossal panorama painting premiered in Paris in October 1918. However, this study is not limited to a specific period of Sousa Lopes. It provides a context for it at the national and international level. A new understanding of the whole of Sousa Lopes’s carrer was needed, as well as his aesthetic ideas and critical reception. Then I explore the international impact of the Great War in painting, illustration and other visual arts, discussing the governments’ patronage of artists and its relation to propaganda. Next I consider the ideological debate in Portugal about the country’s intervention in the war, mainly in the cultural sphere, and the most relevant responses of Portuguese artists to the conflict. One of the central findings of this thesis is Sousa Lopes’s close collaboration with crucial combatants in Flanders, such as Vitorino Godinho, Américo Olavo, Jaime Cortesão and others, who legitimized and promoted his work. But it is also discussed the impact of Sousa Lopes’s works in the postwar years, through his exhibitions and critical reception, whether in the community of combatants or at the institucional level, in the contemporay press or in the history of art up to the present.
Coleman, Kent Stephen. "Halsey at Leyte Gulf : command decision and disunity of effort /". 2006. http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA463797.
Texto completo da fonteLivros sobre o assunto "Mons, Battle of, 1944"
Horsfall, J. C. Mons. London: Leo Cooper, 2000.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteTerraine, John. Mons: The retreat to victory. London: L.Cooper, 1991.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteSharpe, Robert J. The last day, the last hour: The Currie libel trial. Agincourt, Ont: Published for the Osgoode Society by Carswell Co. of Canada, 1988.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteLe Premier choc, la Bataille de Mons: 23-24 Août 1914. Mere, Belgique: Éditions De Krijger, 2014.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteFarr, Don. Mons 1914-1918: The beginning and the end. Solihull: Helion, 2008.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteMachen, Arthur. Spirits of battle: Featuring "The bowmen". Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications, Inc., 2014.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteMurland, Jerry. Retreat and rearguard, 1914: The BEF's actions from Mons to Marne. Barnsley, South Yorkshire: Pen & Sword Military, 2011.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteRichard, Holmes. Riding the retreat: Mons to the Marne 1914 revisited. London: J. Cape, 1995.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteWalter, Bloem. The advance from Mons, 1914: The experiences of a German infantry officer. Solihull: Helion, 2004.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteNeillands, Robin. The Battle of Normandy, 1944. London: Cassell, 2002.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteCapítulos de livros sobre o assunto "Mons, Battle of, 1944"
Folly, Martin H. "The Battle for France 1944". In The Palgrave Concise Historical Atlas of the Second World War, 75–76. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230502390_38.
Texto completo da fonteThomàs, Joan Maria. "The Battle for Wolfram (January–May 1944)". In Roosevelt, Franco, and the End of the Second World War, 67–127. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230118676_3.
Texto completo da fonteAsh, Rhiannon. "Tacitus and the Battle of Mons Graupius: A Historiographical Route Map?" In A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, 413–19. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781405185110.ch43.
Texto completo da fonteCiciarelli, John A. "The Geology of the Battle of Monte Cassino, 1944". In The GeoJournal Library, 325–43. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1550-8_19.
Texto completo da fonteBadsey, Stephen. "Terrain as a Factor in the Battle of Normandy, 1944". In The GeoJournal Library, 345–63. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1550-8_20.
Texto completo da fonteDüring, Marten, e Antal van den Bosch. "Multi-perspective Event Detection in Texts Documenting the 1944 Battle of Arnhem". In Text Mining, 201–19. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12655-5_10.
Texto completo da fontePike, David Wingeate. "From D-Day to the Battle of the Bulge (June–December 1944)". In Franco and the Axis Stigma, 106–12. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230205444_9.
Texto completo da fonteJonker, Capt Geert. "Operation Nobility: The Identification of a Missing Soldier from the Battle of Arnhem, 1944". In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Forensic Archaeology, 189–205. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94397-8_14.
Texto completo da fonteDanchev, Alex. "The Army and The Home Front 1939–1945". In The Oxford History Of The British Army, 298–315. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192853332.003.0014.
Texto completo da fonteMiddlebrook, Martin. "Preparations for Battle". In Arnhem 1944, 59–74. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429039904-5.
Texto completo da fonteTrabalhos de conferências sobre o assunto "Mons, Battle of, 1944"
Ковалева, О. В., e А. В. Ткаченко. "DESTRUCTION OF THE KORSUN-SHEVCHENKO GROUP OF THE WEHRMACHT (JANUARY 24 — FEBRUARY 17, 1944)". In Единство фронта и тыла в годы Великой Отечественной войны. Материалы III международной научной конференции 20 мая 2022 года г. Вязьма. Crossref, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.54016/svitok.2022.84.88.008.
Texto completo da fonte