Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Logical revisionism"
Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos
Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Logical revisionism".
Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.
Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Logical revisionism"
Williams, J. R. G. "Supervaluationism and Logical Revisionism". Journal of Philosophy 105, n.º 4 (2008): 192–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jphil2008105414.
Texto completo da fonteJones, Nicholas K. "Williams on Supervaluationism and Logical Revisionism". Journal of Philosophy 108, n.º 11 (2011): 633–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jphil20111081135.
Texto completo da fonteWright, C. "On being in a quandary. Relativism vagueness logical revisionism". Mind 110, n.º 437 (1 de janeiro de 2001): 45–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/110.437.45.
Texto completo da fonteKhalilov, Vladimir. "Problems of Revisionism in Artistic Interpretations of Historical Events". Russia and America in the 21st Century, n.º 4 (2022): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.18254/s207054760021662-5.
Texto completo da fonteRamčilović, Zećir. "Revizionizam i (zlo)upotreba historije od strane Bugarske prema Sjevernoj Makedoniji i njenoj integraciji u Europsku uniju". Historijski pogledi 5, n.º 8 (15 de novembro de 2022): 134–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.52259/historijskipogledi.2022.5.8.134.
Texto completo da fonteSolak, Necva. "Revisioning Modernity". American Journal of Islam and Society 22, n.º 1 (1 de janeiro de 2005): 140–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v22i1.1745.
Texto completo da fonteSainsbury, R. M. "What logic should we think with?" Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 51 (março de 2002): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1358246100008055.
Texto completo da fonteMarko, Jonathan S. "Above Reason Propositions and Contradiction in the Religious Thought of Robert Boyle". Forum Philosophicum 19, n.º 2 (28 de maio de 2015): 227–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2014.1902.12.
Texto completo da fonteAdnyani, Luh Putu Widya, Indra Kurniawan e Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu. "Development of Creative-Thinking Instrument in Mathematics Problem Solving Based on Logical Mathematics Intelligence". JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) 3, n.º 1 (8 de fevereiro de 2018): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v3i1.5201.
Texto completo da fontePizzutti, Pedro, e Gelson Liston. "A Lógica da Ciência e o Falibilismo Epistemológico do Logical Syntax de Rudolf Carnap". Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN) 27, n.º 54 (4 de outubro de 2020): 9–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2020v27n54id20379.
Texto completo da fonteTeses / dissertações sobre o assunto "Logical revisionism"
Salerno, Joseph Roy. "semantic anti-realism, quasi-realism and logical revisionism /". The Ohio State University, 1999. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1488192119263037.
Texto completo da fonteArazam, Yannis. "Les lois logiques sont-elles révisables ?" Electronic Thesis or Diss., Strasbourg, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024STRAC027.
Texto completo da fonteThe problem of revising logic permeated the thinking of the major authors of the analytic tradition in the 20th century. From Wittgenstein to Dummett and through Quine, Putnam or Kripke, authors have tackled afresh a problem that has taken various forms throughout the history of philosophy. Developments in mathematical logic following the fregean revolution, or even the formalization of quantum mechanics, have both renewed and sharpened the problem. Is there any sense in questioning logical laws classically acknowledged since Aristotle? More simply put, is it intelligible to change our logic ? Are the intuitionnistic refusal of the law of excluded-middle and, more generally, the emergence of "alternative logics" constitutive of a turning point in the history of logic ? The difficulty faced stems from the constitutive nature of logic for thought : if logical laws are the norms of intelligibility, how can they be challenged without undermining the very possibility of meaning ? This work traces this difficulty back to the classical analytical corpus, and gets new perspectives out of it by means of the concept of paradigm, alongside logical developments in the second-half of the 20th century
Rosa, Diorge Vieira. "A ESCADA E O MÍSTICO: COMO ENTENDER UM CONTRASSENSO?" Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 2013. http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9130.
Texto completo da fonteThe goal of this dissertation is to examine the claim of the penultimate aphorism of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, according to which the propositions of the book elucidate if the reader understands the author and acknowledge that they do not make sense, because they are absurd. Thus, the work tries to put into relief some of the central issues of dispute between the interpretive trends, observing the problematic aspects of each line of interpretation, as well as the way in which his supporters articulate their ideas against the prospects of his opponents. To do so, we analyze the two interpretations of the aphorism 6:54. For the standard reading, Wittgenstein discusses issues that the work itself says are ineffable, but there is a substratum of truth which subsists claim of nonsensity. If the standard reading is correct, after the process elucidating the reader reaches a logically correct view of the world, and is in possession of some truths that only show up on the legitimate use of language. As for the revisionist reading, there is no hidden meaning in the work, but only and solely nonsense, do not say anything. The process of elucidating it is a philosophical exercisetherapy. If correct, the revisionist interpretation suggests that the goal of the work is a change in the mode of being of the reader in his relationship with nonsense. Accordingly, from the revisionist reading of Michael Kremer holds up nonsensity an acceptance of the work in line with a positive understanding for contrassensos book. The recognition of the tractarian nonsense as such is the purpose of the work, and this recognition has the ethical purpose. The purpose of the Tractatus is ethical philosophical attitude change front to ultimate foundations for either language, either for ethics. If Kremer is correct, it leads to an alternative nondestructive to the tractarian nonsense, showing that despite their nonsensity, the tractarian absurdities may be useful therapeutically. Thus, it is possible to reconcile tractarian nonsense with his elucidation process and understand how a book composed of absurdities can be useful philosophically.
O objetivo da presente dissertação é analisar a reivindicação do penúltimo aforismo do Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, segundo a qual as proposições do livro elucidam, caso o leitor entenda o seu autor e reconheça que elas não fazem sentido, pois são absurdas. Assim, o trabalho tenta colocar em relevo algumas das questões centrais da disputa entre as correntes interpretativas, observando os aspectos problemáticos de cada linha de interpretação, bem como o modo segundo o qual seus partidários articulam suas ideias contra as perspectivas de seus adversários. Para tanto, analisa-se as duas interpretações do aforismo 6.54. Para a leitura padrão, Wittgenstein aborda assuntos que a própria obra afirma serem inefáveis, mas há um substrato de verdades que subsiste a reivindicação de contrassensualidade. Se a leitura padrão é correta, ao cabo do processo elucidativo o leitor alcança uma perspectiva logicamente correta do mundo, e fica de posse de algumas verdades que somente se mostram no uso legítimo da linguagem. Já para a leitura revisionista, não há nenhum sentido oculto sob a obra, mas apenas e tão somente contrassensos, que não dizem nada. O processo de elucidação se constitui um exercício filosófico-terapêutico. Se correta, a interpretação revisionista propõe que o objetivo da obra é uma mudança no modo de ser do leitor em sua relação com contrassensos. Nesse sentido, a partir da leitura revisionista de Michael Kremer sustenta-se uma aceitação da contrassensualidade da obra em consonância com uma compreensão positiva para os contrassensos do livro. O reconhecimento dos absurdos tractarianos enquanto tais é o objetivo da obra, e esse reconhecimento tem finalidade ética. A finalidade ética do Tractatus é mudar atitude filosófica frente a fundamentações ultimas, quer para a linguagem, quer para ética. Se Kremer está correto, ele conduz a uma alternativa não autodestrutiva para os absurdos tractarianos, mostrando que não obstante sua contrassensualidade, os absurdos tractarianos podem ser terapeuticamente úteis. Dessa forma, é possível conciliar a contrassensualidade tractariana com seu processo de elucidação e entender como um livro composto de absurdos pode ser de utilidade filosófica.
Poirier, Sébastien. "La logique et les logiques : la question du pluralisme". Thèse, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/6066.
Texto completo da fonteStarting from the seminal work of Boole, Frege and Russell, the dissertation seeks to clarify the issue of logical pluralism in the era of the proliferation of non-classical logics and the developments in theoretical computer science and proof theory. Two “historical” chapters are scheduled: the first chapter articulate the absolutism of Frege and Russell, taking care to show how it condemns the possibility to consider alternative structures and logics; the fourth chapter describes the path that led Carnap from the adoption of the syntactic method to the formulation of the principle of tolerance, then goes on to display Carnap‟s instrumentalism in philosophy of Logic and mathematics. Opening with the analysis of an intuitive interpretation of linear logic, the second chapter then turns to the establishment of a form of logico-mathematical pluralism with the help of order theory and category theory. The third chapter delineates the playground of revisionism (philosophical positions surrounding the debate between monism and pluralism) and then provides an argument against the thesis that denies the reality of the conflict between rival logics, all this being done by adopting the substructural logic point of view. The fifth chapter shows that each of the three main approaches to the concept of logical consequence (model-theoretic, proof-theoretic and dialogical) supplies a framework sufficiently general to establish pluralism. In short, the dissertation is a defence of logical pluralism.
Livros sobre o assunto "Logical revisionism"
Minasi͡an, A. M. Dialektika i sofistika: Opyt filosofskoĭ diskussii. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo Rostovskogo universiteta, 1985.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteMiller, Alexander, ed. Logic, Language, and Mathematics. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278343.001.0001.
Texto completo da fonteLogica Post-Moderna (Revisioning Philosophy, Vol 16). Peter Lang Pub Inc, 2000.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteGrim, Patrick, e Nicholas Rescher. Beyond Sets: A Venture in Collection-Theoretic Revisionism. De Gruyter, Inc., 2011.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteGrim, Patrick, e Nicholas Rescher. Beyond Sets: A Venture in Collection-Theoretic Revisionism. de Gruyter GmbH, Walter, 2010.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteGrim, Patrick, e Nicholas Rescher. Beyond Sets: A Venture in Collection-Theoretic Revisionism. de Gruyter GmbH, Walter, 2013.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteGrim, Patrick, e Nicholas Rescher. Beyond Sets: A Venture in Collection-Theoretic Revisionism. De Gruyter, Inc., 2011.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteBeyond Sets: A Venture in Collection - Theoretic Revisionism. Ontos Verlag, 2010.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteSanahuja, José Antonio. A ‘Rashomon’ Story. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793342.003.0009.
Texto completo da fonteChadwick, Andrew. Systemic Hybridity in the Mediation of the American Presidential Campaign. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.003.0008.
Texto completo da fonteCapítulos de livros sobre o assunto "Logical revisionism"
Heinemann, Anna-Sophie. "2. De Morgan and Logic". In Augustus De Morgan, Polymath, 30–54. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/obp.0408.02.
Texto completo da fonteŠefránek, Ján. "Belief, Knowledge, Revisions, and a Semantics of Non-Monotonic Reasoning". In Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, 63–77. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46767-x_5.
Texto completo da fonteHaldimann, Jonas, Christoph Beierle e Gabriele Kern-Isberner. "Syntax Splitting for Iterated Contractions, Ignorations, and Revisions on Ranking Functions Using Selection Strategies". In Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 85–100. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_7.
Texto completo da fonteShieh, Sanford. "Wright and Revisionism". In Logic, Language, and Mathematics, 177–222. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278343.003.0008.
Texto completo da fonteWright, Crispin. "Replies to Part III Logical Revisionism". In Logic, Language, and Mathematics, 384–416. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278343.003.0014.
Texto completo da fonteDorr, Cian, John Hawthorne e Juhani Yli-Vakkuri. "Tolerance and Counterpart Theory". In The Bounds of Possibility, 246–61. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846655.003.0011.
Texto completo da fonteThiess, Derek J. "Between the Alternate and the Apocryphal". In Sideways in Time, 124–38. Liverpool University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789620139.003.0008.
Texto completo da fonteSalmon, Wesley C. "Revisions of Scientific Convictions". In Reality And Rationality, editado por Phil Dowe e Merrilee H. Salmon, 117–25. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195177848.003.0009.
Texto completo da fonteBronner, Stephen Eric. "Eduard Bernstein and the Logic of Revisionism". In Socialism Unbound, 55–76. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429306495-3.
Texto completo da fonteEric Bronner, Stephen. "Eduard Bernstein and the Logic of Revisionism". In Socialism Unbound, 55–76. Columbia University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231153836.003.0003.
Texto completo da fonteTrabalhos de conferências sobre o assunto "Logical revisionism"
Scientific Committee, EAAE-ARCC-IC. "EAAE-ARCC International Conference & 2nd VIBRArch: The architect and the city. Vol. 2". In EAAE-ARCC International Conference & 2nd VIBRArch. Valencia: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/eaae-arcc-ic.2020.13832.
Texto completo da fonteAl Hakami, Muatasem, e Majed Al Hamzah. "RTPD Safety Management System Toward Safety Excellence". In Middle East Oil, Gas and Geosciences Show. SPE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/213283-ms.
Texto completo da fonteSimko, Gabor, Tihamer Levendovszky, Sandeep Neema, Ethan Jackson, Ted Bapty, Joseph Porter e Janos Sztipanovits. "Foundation for Model Integration: Semantic Backplane". In ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2012-70534.
Texto completo da fonteZeng, Y., S. Ryu, C. G. Chaney, A. C. Hill, W. Sun, B. L. Keinath, C. E. Osuji et al. "Finding the Right Concept Via a Decision Quality Framework with Rapid Generation of Multiple Deepwater Conceptual Alternatives". In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. SPE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/210288-ms.
Texto completo da fonteAlklih, Mohamad Yousef, Andi Ahmad Salahuddin, Karem Alejandra Khan, Nidhal Mohamed Aljneibi, Coriolan Rat, Samat Ramatullayev, Shi Su, Adelis Alfonzo, Hussein Mustapha e Monica Mihai. "Integrated Subsurface Study for Gas-Oil Communicating Reservoirs: From Structural Synthesis to Optimum Co-FDP". In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference. SPE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/208044-ms.
Texto completo da fonteAoki, Hirotaka, Nozomi Kobayashi, Mizuki Fuke e Tomonori Yasui. "Development of Scenario-Based Approach Aided by Key PSFs to Design of New Interface of Autonomous Vehicles Monitoring System: A Case Study". In 14th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2023). AHFE International, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003801.
Texto completo da fonteAl Hakami, Muatasem Abdulhadi, e Mohammed Abdullah Al Salah. "The Excellence Model to Implement the Safety Management System Effectively in Oil and Gas Industry". In Gas & Oil Technology Showcase and Conference. SPE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/213980-ms.
Texto completo da fonteRelatórios de organizações sobre o assunto "Logical revisionism"
Garciga, Christian L., Randal J. Verbrugge e Saeed Zaman. The Effect of Component Disaggregation on Measures of the Median and Trimmed-Mean CPI. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, janeiro de 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-202402.
Texto completo da fonte