Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Legality litigation"
Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos
Índice
Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Legality litigation".
Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.
Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Legality litigation"
Eliana, Eliana, Aria Dimas Harapan, Reny Suryani e Sri Endah Indriawati. "The legality of Arable Land Minimizes Disputes". Asian Journal of Social and Humanities 1, n.º 11 (20 de agosto de 2023): 907–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i11.107.
Texto completo da fonteLestari, Reski, Wahyu Subakti e Syed Agung Afandi. "STRATEGI ADVOKASI MELALUI PROSES NONLITIGASI DALAM RANGKA PEMBAHARUAN PROSES PERADILAN DI INDONESIA". JDP (JURNAL DINAMIKA PEMERINTAHAN) 6, n.º 1 (18 de janeiro de 2023): 31–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.36341/jdp.v6i1.3084.
Texto completo da fonteBanjaransari, Ayu Putri Rainah Petung. "Juridical Analysis of Inhibiting Factors in the Implementation of E-Litigation by the Community in the Legal Framework of the Civil Procedure Court". Melayunesia Law 5, n.º 2 (30 de dezembro de 2021): 231. http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/ml.v5i2.7830.
Texto completo da fonteGledhill, Kris. "The Consequences of Acting Unlawfully". International Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law 1, n.º 10 (4 de setembro de 2014): 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.19164/ijmhcl.v1i10.144.
Texto completo da fonteGao, Qi, e Sean Whittaker. "Standing to Sue Beyond Individual Rights: Who Should Be Eligible to Bring Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China?" Transnational Environmental Law 8, n.º 02 (27 de maio de 2019): 327–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2047102519000141.
Texto completo da fonteRadovanov, Aleksandar. "Extraordinary legal remedies in litigation de lege ferenda". Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine 75, n.º 9-10 (2003): 131–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/gakv0304131r.
Texto completo da fonteXiao, Shiling. "State-centric proportionality analysis in Chinese administrative litigation". International Journal of Constitutional Law 21, n.º 2 (1 de abril de 2023): 461–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad051.
Texto completo da fonteSafstrom, Jennifer. "Thirteenth Amendment Litigation in the Immigration Detention Context". Michigan Journal of Race & Law, n.º 26.1 (2020): 205. http://dx.doi.org/10.36643/mjrl.26.1.thirteenth.
Texto completo da fonteWinata, Muhammad, e Zaka Aditya. "Characteristic and Legality of Non-Litigation Regulatory Dispute Resolution Based on Constitutional Interpretation". Brawijaya Law Journal 6, n.º 2 (31 de outubro de 2019): 170–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2019.006.02.04.
Texto completo da fonteFrenyo, Edit. "Unsafe from Any Angle: Vulnerability-Generation on the US–Canada Border". Laws 11, n.º 3 (27 de maio de 2022): 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/laws11030044.
Texto completo da fonteTeses / dissertações sobre o assunto "Legality litigation"
Dupeu, Nael. "Les moyens en contentieux fiscal". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023TOUL0159.
Texto completo da fonteTax litigation arises from a persistent disagreement between the taxpayer and the tax administration. The taxpayer who wishes to contest the tax must submit a contentious claim to the competent tax service before being able, if necessary, to bring the dispute in front of the judge. The taxpayer and the tax authorities must then present means capable of justifying the merits of their respective positions. The tax judge must assess the means of the parties in order to resolve the dispute. The purpose of this study is to systematize the means in tax litigation. The specific nature of the tax dispute has an influence on the means as invoked by the parties and assessed by the judge. The objective nature of tax litigation implies in fact bringing together favorable conditions for the application of tax legality. The parties thus enjoy great freedom to develop their legal argument during the litigation procedure. The purely objective nature of tax litigation is sometimes a source of imbalance between the parties to the tax proceedings. The objective application of tax law is also at the heart of the tax judge's office, although he sometimes reveals a form of subjectivity in his assessment of means. The ambition of this research is to identify the specific features of the means in tax litigation
Bouya, Driss. "Le plan local d'urbanisme à l'épreuve de la hiérarchie des normes". Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSES060/document.
Texto completo da fonteThe Local Urbanism Plan (LUP) set, within the respect of the norms hierarchy, the using rules of the soil on his territory. This hierarchy is constituted by a number of norms and principles which kept growing more and more since it was decentralized. Even though they’re different, these norms are all applicable in the same way to the LUP, with some exceptions. The LUP has to be compatible with their dispositions. This layout apparently coherent hides a high amount of imperfections. Higher norms, but not less generals, can as well be expressed in precise terms, mixing elasticity and rigidity, precision and imprecision, certitude and incertitude. Since nominative reports are not precise, they share in the first place the validity determined by the higher order, but also the incertitude affecting it. They don’t exclude the possibility it will intensify, meaning it could lead to the conformity, and neither have they excluded the weakening leading to a simple take into account. Then the LUP has to deal with these excess of rigor or weakness and to take into account the intellectuals, accessible, relatively stables, and legally secured rules. But this exercise is very tricky and a lot of towns are concerned since they cannot adopt an interpretation totally conform to the spirit of the superior norm without escaping the reproduction of the ambiguity which characterize this norm at the LUP level. As a result, LUPs become hardly decipherable and legally vulnerable since their recipients, which have hard times to give a precise meaning to this rules and characterize with precision which are applicable to a given time, are always ready to contest it. In this context, the judge received new capabilities in order to temper the litigation impact about the LUP legal security. Thus, alternatives to its cancelling are added to the drastic monitoring of the admissibility conditions of the recourse against the LUP
Morón, Urbina Juan Carlos. "The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law". IUS ET VERITAS, 2016. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123219.
Texto completo da fonteEl presente artículo explica el proceso contencioso de lesividad a partir de la naturaleza jurídica de éste .Así, el autor menciona que el fundamento del proceso de lesividad ha sido en nuestro derecho la pervivencia de la tutela administrativa de la legalidad y del interés público pero limitando la autotutela, la exigencia de convicción en la autoridad para perseguir la anulación de un acto y garantizar el debido proceso del administrado favorecido con el acto.
Lebret, Anne-Sophie. "La distinction des nullités relative et absolue". Thesis, Paris 2, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PA020050.
Texto completo da fonteThe scholarly distinction of relative and absolute nullities appeared in our law during the sixteenth century. Ever since, scholarly opinion has been that the entire regime of a cause of nullity depends on the implementation of this distinction. The operational nature of this distinction is regularly questioned, and even discussed. Yet, its probable establishment by the upcoming reform of the law of obligations urges a scrutiny of this distinction’s relevance. In order to fulfil its task of knowledge of the law, the distinction of relative and absolute nullities must, like every binary distinction, possess three characteristics: firstly, a solid criterion of distinction must enable it to be operational; secondly, the two parts of the distinction must correspond to two sets of significantly different rules, this difference being the heart of the distinction; and thirdly, a difference in the nature of the two parts of the distinction, established by the chosen criterion, and justifying the difference of regimes. However, after close analysis, the distinction of relative and absolute nullities possesses neither a reliable criterion of distinction, nor an uncontested difference in the regimes, nor a duality of nature. The study of the nullity’s nature will enable us to state that nullity has a uniform nature: nullity will be analysed as a sanction of the act’s legality that must be imposed. More often than not, it will be imposed by the judge and will have a judicial nature. Thus, the uniform nature of judicial sanction of the act’s legality must correspond to a single regime, in other words it must correspond to rules that are common to all causes of nullity. Since the nature conditions the regime, the latter must be established by taking into consideration the nature of the proposed nullity. Nevertheless, it is necessary to also take into consideration the legal provisions specific to certain causes of nullity
Duclos, Nolwenn. "L'excès de pouvoir négatif de l'administration". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Orléans, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021ORLE3074.
Texto completo da fonteDouble-sided medal, the judicial abuse of power is doubled depending on whether it characterizes the behavior of the judge who has left the circle of his attributions or his attitude when he refuses to judge or to recognize a power that the law confers on him. This dichotomy between positive abuse of power on the one hand, and negative abuse of power on the other hand, is largely foreign to the study of the abuse of power of the administration. Although now understood more broadly than its judicial counterpart, the abuse of power of the administration is never presented as a concept susceptible to duplicate according to the positive or negative nature of the committed illegality. This paradox results less from the absence of such a duality than from the predominance of a historically positive conception of the abuse of power of the administration which reduces any illegality to an overrun by the administrative authority of the limits assigned to its power. The exploration of 'the various manifestations characterized by abuse of power' suffices to note that under the traditional classifications, negative illegalities are diffuse and multiple. They have in common that they reflect the negative violation by the administrative authority of the standards imposed on it in its legal activity, either because the act is tainted with a negative defect, or because it has illegally refused to adopt a positive act. The nature of these illegalities, the sum of which draws the outlines of a negative conception of abuse of power, calls for the exercise of special powers on the part of the administrative judge. The gradual emancipation of the negative dimension of one's role to enable it to act positively for the administration or directly on the administrative act responds to such an imperative. Symptomatic, in many respects, of structural reflections that run through the study of administrative litigation, the study of the negative abuse of power of the administration invites reflection on the changing nature of the relations forged by the judge with the administration of which it ensures the control of acts and the litigant whose expectations it meets
Benzaquen, Bélinda. "Primauté et recours". Thesis, Lyon 3, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015LYO30015.
Texto completo da fonteAbsolute primacy of Community law or supremacy of constitutional provisions ? Devoted to the analysis of the conflicts born or to be born between EU law and constitutional standards, this doctoral study focused on analysis of the link between the terms of primacy or preemption rule and jurisdictional actions to raise that in this kind of litigation disputes a unreported legal syllogism is applied. It's one that cumulatively preserves the hierarchical criterion characterizing the domestic legal systems of the Member States, at its peak the principle of supremacy of the Constitution over all others and the effective application of the material primacy of Union law ; recent developments in internal law of the Union converge in this sense : in a dispute litigation, primacy is no longer a problem of constitutional legality, the conflict is circumvent. Concerning this matter, the debate on the authority and the force of traditional international law on constitutional law no longer arises. It has been separated between the force and the effect of the treaties of international law of the Union. Yet in terms of principles, even within a federal State, the definitional content and especially the handling of the constitutional text have not been revisited ; the Constitution is the legal basis without being the content validity of the primacy of Union law, the supreme text operates as a reference technique, it fits two types of fields based on the criterion of the contentious issue. Supremacy and rule are two different legal nature principles which do not compete. The prevalence of the material primacy of Union law sets no supremacy at the top of the pyramidal hierarchy of standards of each of the acceding States
Livros sobre o assunto "Legality litigation"
Levush, Ruth. Israel: Legality of the decision to release convicted Palestinians in the context of peace negotiations. Washington, D.C.]: The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center, 2013.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteMajelis Agama Khonghucu Indonesia "Boen Bio" Surabaya., ed. Antara formalisme [dan] hati nurani: Sebuah pergulatan pasangan Konfusiani Budi Wijaya & Lany Guito menggapai legalitas. [Surabaya]: Majelis Agama Konghucu Indonesia "Boen Bio" Surabaya, 1996.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteCarissima, Mathen. Part V Rights and Freedoms, A Litigating and Interpreting the Charter, Ch.30 Access to Charter Justice. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0030.
Texto completo da fonteDashwood, Alan. EU Acts and Member State Acts in the Negotiation, Conclusion, and Implementation of International Agreements. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198817468.003.0008.
Texto completo da fonteCoallier, Julien. Abatement of Litigation Agreement - Legally Binding: Banking & Collections, Legal Forms Book. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteSawyer, Suzana. The Small Matter of Suing Chevron. Duke University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9781478022572.
Texto completo da fonteMeeran, Richard, e Jahan Meeran, eds. Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866220.001.0001.
Texto completo da fonteWallach, Daniel L. The “Shifting Line” of Sports Betting Legalization. Editado por Michael A. McCann. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190465957.013.17.
Texto completo da fonteGathii, James Thuo. The East African Court of Justice. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795582.003.0003.
Texto completo da fontePfander, James E. Cases Without Controversies. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197571408.001.0001.
Texto completo da fonteCapítulos de livros sobre o assunto "Legality litigation"
Barak, Gregg. "Weaponizing the law, litigation, and legality". In Criminology on Trump, 84–108. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003221548-5.
Texto completo da fonteZhang, Chenyang. "Class Action in China?—Representative Litigation". In Win in Chinese Courts, 121–29. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3342-6_7.
Texto completo da fonteFischer-Lescano, Andreas. "From Strategic Litigation to Juridical Action". In Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights, 299–312. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73835-8_15.
Texto completo da fonteBorsuk, İmren, Pınar Dinç, Sinem Kavak e Pınar Sayan. "Consolidating and Contesting Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Turkey: Towards a Framework". In Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Resistance in Turkey, 11–59. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4213-5_2.
Texto completo da fonteTchermalykh, Nataliya. "Representing the Child Before the Court". In The Politics of Children’s Rights and Representation, 105–28. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04480-9_5.
Texto completo da fonte"US Litigation by Chinese Companies". In Negotiating Legality, 124–58. Cambridge University Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108954891.005.
Texto completo da fonteWatt, Horatia Muir. "The Conceptual Economy of Private International Law". In Essays in International Litigation for Lord Collins, 51—C2.N70. Oxford University PressOxford, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192867988.003.0003.
Texto completo da fonteJauhar, Ameen. "Emerging Legal Trends on Hyperlinks and Meta-Tags". In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Business Convergence, Computing, and Legality, 46–53. IGI Global, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4209-6.ch005.
Texto completo da fonteBerman, Paul Schiff. "Global Legal Pluralism and the Making of International Climate Change Law". In The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2022, 109–18. Oxford University PressNew York, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197752265.003.0006.
Texto completo da fonteZumbini, Angela Ferrari. "Standards of Judicial Review of Administrative Action (1890–1910) in the Austro-Hungarian Empire". In Administrative Justice Fin de siècle, 41–72. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867562.003.0002.
Texto completo da fonteTrabalhos de conferências sobre o assunto "Legality litigation"
Abdullah, Yahya. "Judicial oversight of applications submitted to the administration is a reason for its development". In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DEFICIENCIES AND INFLATION ASPECTS IN LEGISLATION. University of Human Development, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21928/uhdicdial.pp191-212.
Texto completo da fonte