Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Land tenure – Law and legislation – Wales"
Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos
Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Land tenure – Law and legislation – Wales".
Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.
Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Land tenure – Law and legislation – Wales"
Katusiime, Juliet, e Brigitta Schütt. "Towards Legislation Responsive to Integrated Watershed Management Approaches and Land Tenure". Sustainability 15, n.º 3 (25 de janeiro de 2023): 2221. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15032221.
Texto completo da fonteNg'ong'ola, Clement. "Land Problems in Some Peri-Urban Villages in Botswana and Problems of Conception, Description and Transformation of “Tribal” Land Tenure". Journal of African Law 36, n.º 2 (1992): 140–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855300009864.
Texto completo da fonteArizona, Yance, e Umi Illiyina. "The Constitutional Court and Forest Tenure Conflicts in Indonesia". Constitutional Review 10, n.º 1 (31 de maio de 2024): 103. http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/consrev1014.
Texto completo da fonteGebremichael, Brightman. "Public Purpose as a Justification for Expropriation of Rural Land Rights in Ethiopia". Journal of African Law 60, n.º 2 (15 de fevereiro de 2016): 190–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855315000285.
Texto completo da fontePienaar, Gerrit. "The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure". Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 15, n.º 3 (29 de maio de 2017): 152. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i3a2506.
Texto completo da fonteMackenzie, Fiona. "Conflicting Claims to Custom: Land and Law in Central Province, Kenya, 1912–52". Journal of African Law 40, n.º 1 (1996): 62–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855300007130.
Texto completo da fonteTramel, Salena. "The Tenure Guidelines in Policy and Practice: Democratizing Land Control in Guatemala". Land 8, n.º 11 (6 de novembro de 2019): 168. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land8110168.
Texto completo da fonteUnruh, Jon. "Land Policy Reform, Customary Rule of Law and the Peace Process in Sierra Leone". African Journal of Legal Studies 2, n.º 2 (2008): 94–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/221097312x13397499736507.
Texto completo da fonteM. D., Md Damiri, Pakhriazad H. Z., Paiman B. e Mohd Hasmadi I. "Revisiting British Malaya's Era: An Intriguing Historical Legal Analysis of Land Administration and Colonial Forestry". Journal of Politics and Law 16, n.º 4 (3 de outubro de 2023): 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v16n4p27.
Texto completo da fonteAchiba, Gargule A., e Monica N. Lengoiboni. "Devolution and the politics of communal tenure reform in Kenya". African Affairs 119, n.º 476 (25 de maio de 2020): 338–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adaa010.
Texto completo da fonteTeses / dissertações sobre o assunto "Land tenure – Law and legislation – Wales"
Johnson, Ebrezia. "Communal land and tenure security: analysis of the South African Communal Land Rights Act 11 of 2004". Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/2165.
Texto completo da fonteENGLISH ABSTRACT: In this thesis, the Communal Land Rights Act 11 0f 2004 is analysed in order to determine whether it can give effect to the constitutional mandate in terms of which it was promulgated, namely section 25(5), (6) and (9) of the Constitution. Land policy pertaining to land tenure reform is discussed to see how and to what extent it finds application in the Act. The time-consuming process pertaining to the registration of the community rules is investigated, and the implications where a community fails to adhere to this peremptory provision in the Act are explained. The thesis also analyses and discusses the functions of statutorily created institutions, like the land administration committee and the land rights boards, in the efficient management of land in rural areas. The aforementioned land administration committee is particularly problematic, since the Act provides that in cases where a recognised tribal authority exist, that institution “may” be considered as the land administration committee, subject to prescribed composition requirements as contained in the Act. The Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act will also be discussed since it intersects with the Communal Land Rights Act in this regard. The pending constitutional challenge which relates to this potentially problematic issue, will be discussed. The constitutional challenge of the Act by four communities’ is explored in order to indicate just how potentially problematic the institution of traditional leadership could be. vi This study also discusses and analyses the compromise contained in the Act, regarding the registration of the land title of a community and the registration of “new order rights” in the name of individuals. In this context the impact of this process on the efficacy on the current Deeds registration system is investigated. The Ministerial determination and its constitutional implications is yet another issue, examined in this study. All of these issues will have a negative impact on the implementation of the Communal Land Rights Act and especially on achieving tenure security.
AFRIKAANS OPSOMMING: In hierdie tesis word die Wet op Kommunale Grondregte 11 van 2004 geanaliseer om te bepaal of dit inderdaad voldoen aan die grondwetlike mandaat soos voorsien in art 25(5), (6) en (9) van die Grondwet. Die beleid van toepassing op grondbeheerhervorming word bespreek om te bepaal tot watter mate dit wel in die Wet aanwending vind. Die tydrowende prosedure van die registrasie van gemeenskapsreëls word ondersoek, asook die implikasies indien ‘n gemeenskap nie aan die voorskriftelike bepaling voldoen nie. Die tesis bespreek en evalueer ook die funksies van die twee instellings wat statutêr geskep is, naamlik grond administrasie komitees en grondregte rade. Die twee instellings is geskep met die doel om van hulp te wees in die effektiewe administrasie van grond in die kommunale areas. Dit is veral die grond administrasie komitee wat problematies is, omdat die Wet op Kommunale Grondregte bepaal dat waar ‘n gemeenskap ‘n erkende tradisionele owerheid het, hierdie owerheid beskou sal word as die grond administrasie komitee van daardie spesifieke gemeenskap. In hierdie konteks is ‘n bespreking van die Wet op Tradisionele Leierskap en Regeringsraamwerk, noodsaaklik. Die betwiste grondwetlike kwessie wat tot op hede nog onbeslis is wat hiermee verband hou, sal ook bespreek word. ‘n Kort uiteensetting word gedoen van die vier gemeenskappe wat die Wet op grondwetlik gronde aanveg om presies te probeer aantoon hoe problematies die instelling van tradisionele leierskap is. Hierdie studie bespreek en analiseer verder ook die kompromis wat getref is tussen registrasie van die titelakte in die naam van ‘n gemeenskap en die viii registrasie van sogenaamde “nuwe orde regte” in die naam van individue. Die impak van hierdie magdom registrasies op die bestaande registrasiesisteem word ook oorweeg. Die grondwetlikheid van die ministeriële besluitnemingsbevoegdheid word breedvoerig bespreek in hierdie studie. Al hierdie genoemde kwessies mag nadelige impak hê op die implementering van die Wet op Kommunale Grondregte en spesifiek ook op grondbeheerhervorming.
Mostert, Hanri. "The relevance of constitutional protection and regulation of property for the private law of ownership in South Africa and Germany : a comparative analysis with specific reference to land law reform". Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/52013.
Texto completo da fonteENGLISH ABSTRACT: This dissertation is an attempt at reconciling the existing (and until recently predominant) private law concept of ownership and the property rights espoused by the new constitutional order. The attempts at land reform in South Africa and Germany are used as specifie examples of the manner in which the whole property law order in both these legal systems is developed through legislative and judicial initiative, on the basis of the constitutional provisions concerning property protection and regulation. The purpose of the investigation is to determine to what extent constitutional development of the private law of property will result in a property law order serving the socio-economic and political goals of economic growth and self-fulfilment and empowerment of the individual. Focus is placed on the influence of the constitutional protection and regulation of property as a mechanism for developing the private law of ownership in Germany and South Africa. In the first part of the exposition, the choice of legal comparison as course of inquiry is substantiated, and the terminological difficulties connected with an investigation into the development of the private law of property by the constitutional protection and regulation of property are discussed. Attention is given to the use of the terms "ownership" and "property" in the private law and in the constitutional context. The term "tenure" is also discussed in the context of land reform in South Africa. Further, the usc of terms such as "public interest", "common weal" and "public purposes" is discussed. The use of these terms are particularly complicated by the fact that each of them are often used in more than one sense, and that the use of these di fferent terms overlap to varying extents. The second part of the exposition contains information on the background of the constitutional property orders as they arc found in Germany and South Africa. The drafting histories of the South African and German constitutional property clauses indicate that in both these legal systems, the constitutional property clauses have hybrid ideological foundations. Both contain a compromise between, on the one hand, classical liberalism (which affords the holders of rights a high degree of individual freedom and autonomy) and, on the other hand, social democracy (which allow stronger regulatory measures, also upon private properly). Further, some of the structural aspects connected to constitutional protection and regulation of property in Germany and South Africa are discussed. The positively phrased property guarantee in art 14 GG is compared with the negatively phrased "guarantee" of s 25 Fe, whereby the transitional property guarantee in s 28 JC is also considered. Further, the basic structure and stages of an inquiry into the constitutional property clause are discussed, with reference to differences between the German and South African methods. These differences are not of such a nature that it excludes further comparison. Ilowever, it is necessary to keep the differences in the judicial system in mind when conducting a comparison of the present nature. Therefore, a brief overview of the judicial systems of Germany and South Africa is provided, with specific reference to the manner in which the courts resolved certain property questions. The principles underlying the constitutional orders of Germany and South Africa are also discussed with specific reference to their significance for the treatment of property issues. In particular, the meaning of the constitutional state (Rechtsstaat) and the social wei fare state (Sozialstaat) for the solution of problems connected to property is discussed. It is indicated that the legitimacy of the legal order in general and property law in particular, depends on the degree of success in the implementation of these values. Further, it is indicated that the implementation of these values also determines the importance of private property and/or regulation thereof in a specific legal system. In the third part of the exposition, the relevance of the constitutional protection and regulation for the private law of ownership is discussed. The expansion of the concept of property by the application of a "purely" constitutional definition thereof raises the question as to the continued relevance of the private law concept of ownership. This issue is discussed with reference to the protection of property in terms of the constitution in comparison with the scope of property in private law. It is indicated that the "exclusively constitutional" concept of property is by no means based only on Constitutional law. The role of the private law concept of ownership in a constitutional order is then elucidated. The discussion then turns to an analysis of the limitations on property endorsed by the constitutional order. Two main kinds of limitation are possible: (i) limitation of property through vertical operation of the constitution (ie a broad category of legislative and administrative deprivation (regulation), and a more specialised category, namely expropriations), and (ii) limitation through horizontal operation of the constitution (ie through the inroads allowed on property rights by the protection of other rights in the Bill of Rights). It is indicated that the application of the public interest / public purposes requirements are sometimes intended to protect individual interest above those of society in general. In other cases, the public interest / public purposes requirement is aimed at securing the interests of the society at large. Further, it is indicated that the purpose of constitutional "interference" in the area of private property law is to correct imbalances in the relations among private persons which are regarded by the law as "equals," even if they are not equal for all practical purposes. The fourth part of the exposition concentrates on the land reform programmes in Germany (after the reunification of 1990) and South Africa (since 1991) in order to analyse the attempts by the legislature and judiciary to give effect to the improved property order as anticipated by constitutional development of property. In both Germany and South Africa political changes made land reform programmes essential: In South Africa the land reform programme was introduced to reverse the injustices created by colonialism and apartheid. A tripartite programme is employed for this purpose. The new kinds of land rights created through this system of land reform are indicated. The manner in which this body of law is treated by the courts is also analysed with reference to its relevance for the development of Property Law in general. In Germany a property and land reform programme became necessary with the reunification. On the one hand, the socialist property order in the former GDR had to be replaced by the property order already existing in the FGR, and on the other hand the individual claims for restitution of the land and enterprises taken by the GDR state or its Soviet predecessor had to be balanced against the claims that present occupiers of such land have to it. The influence of legislation and litigation connected to these issues on the development of Property Law is discussed. The final part of the exposition is a summary of the conclusions drawn during the course of the analysis.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: In 'n poging om in hierdie uiteensetting die bestaande (en tot onlangs nog oorheersende) privaatregtelike begrip "eiendom" te versoen met die breër eiendomsbegrip wat deur die nuwe grondwetlike bestel gepropageer word, word die grondhervormingsprogramme in Suid Afrika en Duitsland gebruik as voorbeelde van die wyse waarop die bestaande Eiendomsreg in beide regsisteme deur die wetgewer en die howe ontwikkel word. Die doel van die ondersoek is om vas te stel tot watter mate die grondwetlike ontwikkeling van privaatregtelike Eiendomsreg sal bydra tot die totstandkoming van 'n eiendomsregtelike regsorde waarin die sosio-ekonomiese en politieke doelwitte van ekonomiese groei en die vrye ontwikkeling en bemagtiging van die individu gedien word. Die klem word geplaas op die grondwetlike beskerming en regulering van eiendom as 'n meganisme waardeur die privaatregtelike Eiendomsreg in Duitsland en Suid- Afrika ontwikkel kan word. Die eerste deel van die uiteensetting begrond die keuse van regsvergelying as metode van analise en bespreek die terminologiese probleme wat in 'n ondersoek na die grondwetlike ontwikkeling van die privaatregtelike eiendomsreg kan opduik. Aandag word gegee aan die gebruik van begrippe wat verband hou met eiendom en publieke belang in sowel die privaatreg as in die grondwetlike konteks. Die gebruik van verskillende terme, veral in Engels, kan problematies wees, en daarom word dit breedvoeriger bespreek. In die tweede deel van die uiteensetting word die agtergrond waarteen die grondwetlike bestelle van Duitsland en Suid-Afrika funksioneer, bespreek: Eers word die formulering van die eiendomsklousules in Suid-Afrika en Duitsland vanuit 'n historiese perspektief ondersoek. In beide regsisteme is die grondwetlike eiendomsklousules op 'n kompromis tussen verskillende ideologieë gebaseer. Enersyds op klassieke liberalisme, in terme waarvan eienaars en ander reghebbendes 'n hoë mate van individuele vryheid en outonomie toegeken word; andersyds op sosiaal-demokratiese denke, in terme waarvan strenger regulerende maatreëls (ook op privaat eiendom) geduld moet word. Dan word sommige van die strukturele aspekte verbonde aan die grondwetlike beskerming en regulering van eiendom in Duitsland en Suid-Afrika bespreek. Die positief geformuleerde eiendomswaarborg in art 14 GG word vergelyk met die negatiewe formulering in art 25 FG en die positiewe waarborg in art 28 lG. Verder word die basiese struktuur en fases van 'n grondwetlike ondersoek in die beskerming en regulering van eiendom bespreek, met spesifieke verwysing na die verskille in die Duitse en Suid-Afrikaanse benaderings. Hierdie verskille is nie van so 'n aard dat dit regsvergelyking kortwiek nie. Nogtans is dit noodsaaklik dat die benaderingsverskille in ag geneem word vir 'n meer diepgaande vergelyking. Daarom word 'n vlugtige oorsig oor die rol van die howe in die hantering van eiendomsvraagstukke in grondwetlike konteks verskaf. Verder word die beginsels onderliggend aan die grondwetlike bestelle in Duitsland en Suid-Afrika bespreek met spesifieke verwysing na die betekenis daarvan vir die beskerming en regulering van eiendom. Daar word veral klem gelê op die regstaat- en sosiaalstaatbeginsels. Die legitimi teit van die regsorde in die algemeen, en meer spesifiek die Eiendomsreg, hang af van die mate van sukses waarmee hierdie beginsels in die gemeenskap geïmplementeer word. Daar word verder aangedui dat die toepassing van hierdie beginsels die mate van individuele vryheid in die uitoefening van eiendomsreg en/of die graad van regulering van eiendomsreg in 'n bepaalde regstelsel bepaal. Die derde deel van die uiteensetting konsentreer op die betekenis van die grondwetlike beskerming en regulering van eiendom vir die privaatregtelike Eiendomsreg. Die uitgebreide eiendomsbegrip wat in die grondwetlike konteks aangewend word, gee aanleiding tot die vraag na die sin van 'n voortgesette enger eiendomsbegrip in die privaatreg. Hierdie kwessie word bespreek met verwysing na die beskerming van eiendom in terme van die grondwet, en word vergelyk met die omvang van die eiendomsbegrip in die privaatreg. Daar word aangedui dat die sogenaamde uitsluitlik grondwetlike eiendomsbegrip geensins eksklusief aan die Grondwetlike Reg is nie. Die rol van die privaatregtelike eiendomsbegrip in 'n grondwetlike bestel word vervolgens uiteengesit. Verder word die beperkings op eiendom in die grondwetlike konteks geanaliseer. In beginsel is twee soorte beperkings regverdigbaar: (i) Beperking van eiendomsreg deur die vertikale aanwending van die grondwet, dit wil sê deur die breër kategorie wetgewende en administratiewe ontnemings (regulerings) van eiendomsreg en deur 'n enger en meer spesifieke kategorie, naamlik onteiening; en (ii) beperking van eiendomsreg deur horisontale aanwending van die grondwet, dit wil sê deur die inbreuk op eiendomsregte wat toegelaat word as gevolg van die uitwerking van die beskerming van ander regte in die Handves vir Menseregte. Daar word aangedui dat die vereiste van publieke belang in twee teenoorstaande opsigte gebruik word: Enersyds om die individuele belang bo dié van die gemeenskap te stel, en andersyds om die gemeenskap se belange as sulks te beskerm. Daar word ook aangedui dat grondwetlike "inmenging" met privaatregtelike eiendomsreg daarop gemik is om ongebalanseerdhede in die regsverhoudings tussen persone wat deur die reg as "gelykes" bejeën word en in effek nie gelyk is nie, uit te skakel. In die vierde deel van die uiteensetting word die grondhervormingsprogramrne in Duitsland (sedert hervereniging in 1990) en Suid-Afrika (sedert 1991) bespreek. Die klem val op die pogings van die wetgewer en howe om die verbeterde eiendomsbestel, soos wat dit in die grondwet in die vooruitsig gestel word, te konkretiseer. In beide regstelsels het politieke veranderinge 'n grondhervormingsprogram onontbeerlik gemaak: Die grondhervormingsprogram in Suid-Afrika het ten doelom die ongeregtighede in die grondbesitstelsel wat ontstaan het as gevolg van kolonialisme en apartheid uit te skakel. Vir dié doel berus die grondhervormingsprogram op drie verwante, maar uiteenlopende, beginsels. Die nuwe vorme van grondregte wat uit hierdie sisteem ontstaan, word aangedui, en die wyse waarop hierdie deel van die reg deur die howe hanteer word, word bespreek met verwysing na die betekenis daarvan vir die ontwikkeling van die Eiendomsreg. In Duitsland is die noodwendigheid van 'n grondhervormingsprogram aan die hervereniging van die DDR en die BRD gekoppel. Die sosialisties-georienteerde eiendomsbestel wat in die "oostelike" deel van Duitsland aanwending gevind het, moes vervang word deur die bestel wat reeds in die "westelike" deel van die "nuwe" staat in werking was. Verder moet die grondeise van persone wat grond of besigheidseiendom verloor het gedurende die sosialistiese regeringstyd en die voorafgaande Sowjetiese besetting, opgeweeg word teen die aansprake wat huidige besitters op sulke grond het. Die invloed van wetgewing en regspraak hieroor op die Eiendomsreg word geanaliseer. Die laaste deel van die uiteensetting bevat 'n samevatting van die gevolgtrekkings wat deur die loop van die analise gemaak is.
McLaughlin, George E. "A theological study of Leviticus 25:1-25 with application to modern land ethics /". Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1986. http://www.tren.com.
Texto completo da fonteGraham, Nicole. "Lawscape : paradigm and place in Australian property law". Phd thesis, Faculty of Law, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/6269.
Texto completo da fonteYip, Kwan Chung. "Legal Production of Land (In)justice in Hong Kong". HKBU Institutional Repository, 2019. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_oa/601.
Texto completo da fonteGrattan, Donald Scott Law Faculty of Law UNSW. "The logos of land: economic and proprietarian conceptions of statutory access rights". Awarded by:University of New South Wales. Law, 2006. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/24368.
Texto completo da fonteClark, Tony Rodney. "The impact of employment equity legislation on land reform delivery within the provincial land reform office of the department of rural development and land reform in the Western Cape". Thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11838/2106.
Texto completo da fonteThe main objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of Employment Equity Legislation on land reform delivery within the Provincial Land Reform Office of the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform in the Western Cape Province. In order to achieve this goal the researcher conducted a literature search of relevant books, journal articles, academic papers, news paper articles, legislation and subordinate legislation, policy documents, official reports, other applicable published and unpublished research materials. In conjunction with the literature search, the researcher developed a survey questionnaire to establish whether employment equity legislation does have a negative impact on land reform delivery within the provincial land reform office in the Western Cape. The survey was conducted arnonqst 60 employees within the Provincial Land Reform Office in Cape Town, including the District Offices of the Provincial Office. Fifty four (54) responses were used in the analysis, which represent a 90% rate of return. Based on the findings of the literature study and the empirical survey, 51.9% respondents' are of the opinion that the implementation of employment equity legislation does have a negative impact on land reform delivery within the provincial land reform office of the Western Cape. The researcher recommends that the department should consider using provincial demographics when employing staff within its provincial offices to ensure a more stable workforce. This is a true reflection of the responses as the majority of the respondents (81.5 %) agreed that Employment Equity (EE) targets should be based on provincial demographics rather than national demographics, whilst 13% of the respondents disagreed with this statement. Seventy seven comma eight percent (77.8 %) of the respondents also agreed that EE should reflect the target market being served. This will go a long way to foster good employer - employee relationships.
Yanou, Michael A. "Access to land as a human right the payment of just and equitable compensation for dispossessed land in South Africa". Thesis, Rhodes University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003214.
Texto completo da fonteHerne, Stephen Charles. "A jurisprudence of difference : the denial of full respect in the Australian law of native title". University of Western Australia. Law School, 2009. http://theses.library.uwa.edu.au/adt-WU2008.0262.
Texto completo da fonteCarter, M. Renae. "Property, Jubilee, and redemption in ancient Israel". Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN) Access this title online, 2005. http://www.tren.com.
Texto completo da fonteLivros sobre o assunto "Land tenure – Law and legislation – Wales"
Sexton, Roger. Land law textbook. 2a ed. Oxford ; aNew York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteSexton, Roger. Land law textbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteFrancis, Gray Susan, ed. Elements of land law. 3a ed. London: Butterworths, 2001.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteS, Hopkins Nicholas, e Nield Sarah, eds. Land law: Text, cases, and materials. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteSayles, Victoria. Land law concentrate. 2a ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteSmith, Roger J. Property law: Cases and materials. 5a ed. Harlow, England: Pearson, 2012.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteBoos, Charles De. The poor man: Law and satire in 19th century New South Wales. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly, 2005.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteAlbānī, Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn. al- Burhān fī radd al-buhtān wa-al-ʻudwān. Bayrūt: Qism al-Taṣḥīḥ, al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1992.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteSharp, Nonie. Saltwater people: The waves of memory. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2002.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteSharp, Nonie. Saltwater people: The waves of memory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteCapítulos de livros sobre o assunto "Land tenure – Law and legislation – Wales"
Hannam, Ian. "Legislative Protection for the Soil Environment and Climate Change". In International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2022, 51–82. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40609-6_3.
Texto completo da fonteBirks, Peter. "Land Legislation for England and Wales 1925–2001". In The Law of Property, 101–10. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299936.003.0007.
Texto completo da fonteMcFarlane, Ben, Nicholas Hopkins e Sarah Nield. "20. Regulating Leases and Protecting Occupiers". In Land Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806066.003.0020.
Texto completo da fonteMcFarlane, Ben, Nicholas Hopkins e Sarah Nield. "20. Regulating Leases and Protecting Occupiers". In Land Law, 754–77. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198868521.003.0020.
Texto completo da fonteGeorge, Martin, e Antonia Layard. "5. Registration of Title". In Thompson's Modern Land Law, 111–80. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198828020.003.0005.
Texto completo da fonteThompson, Mark P., e Martin George. "5. Registration of Title". In Thompson's Modern Land Law. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722830.003.0005.
Texto completo da fonteGeorge, Martin, e Antonia Layard. "5. Registration of Title". In Thompson's Modern Land Law, 117–91. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198869061.003.0005.
Texto completo da fonteBowes, Ashley. "Environmental Impact Assessment". In A Practical Approach to Planning Law. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780198833253.003.0012.
Texto completo da fontePeters, Pauline E. "Struggles over Land under Customary Tenure in Contemporary Sub-Saharan Africa". In The Oxford Handbook of Land Politics, C2.S1—C2.N2. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618646.013.2.
Texto completo da fonteDale, Peter, e John McLaughlin. "Formalizing Property Rights". In Land Administration. Oxford University Press, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198233909.003.0007.
Texto completo da fonte