Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Great Britain. 1878 June 4"
Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos
Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Great Britain. 1878 June 4".
Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.
Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Great Britain. 1878 June 4"
1
Sonyel, Salâhi R. "Turkish Cypriots - A People Unfairly Treated And Isolated by the International Community". Belleten 73, n.º 266 (1 de abril de 2009): 179–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2009.179.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The struggles of the Turkish people of Cyprus for their existence and human rights began immediately after the signing of the Cyprus Agreement, on 4 June 1878, between the Ottoman State and England (Britain), giving the latter the right to occupy Cyprus provisionally. These struggles accelerated following attempts by the Greek Cypriots, pampered by the British, to aspire for enosis (union with Greece), and reached the zenith after the establishment of the Republic of Cyprus in 1960. The Greek Cypriots, who believed that the establishment of the Republic of Cyprus was provisional, and dreamt of the Megali Idea (Great Ideal), in the fulfilment of Greek imperialism, prepared various secret plans and plots in order to cow down, and eliminate the Turkish Cypriots, which they began to implement in 1964. However, there were splits and divisions among them, which led to the Sampson coup d'etat in 1974. However, there were splits and divisions among them, which led to the Sampson coup d'etat in 1974, thereby causing Turkey to intervene, as one of the guarantor powers, in order to protect the Turkish Cypriots against the Greek-Cypriot plans to exterminate them. However, Western states and organisations, and particularly the European Union (EU), which admire, and are under the influence of, ancient Hellenes continued, and still continue, to recognise the government of South Cyprus as the 'legal government' of the whole island and refuse to recognise the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. As a result, the Turkish Cypriots have been subjected to isolation, unfairly and contrary to the principles of justice. In this monograph I shall try to reveal as to how and why the EU decided, with the pressure of Greece, to admit South Cyprus to membership contrary to the principles of fairness, justice and legality.
2
Iseni, Fati, e Agim Jakupi. "British Diplomacy on Demonstrations of March and April 1981 in Yugoslavia (Kosovo)". European Journal of Social Science Education and Research 9, n.º 1 (1 de janeiro de 2022): 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/976fdv73.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Great Britain since the late 19th and early 20th centuries had increased its interest for the developments in the Balkan region. Since the Berlin Congress in June 1878, the Conference of Ambassadors in London, December 1912-May 1913, then during WWI and WWII. Her interest continued also during the Cold War. Tito's Yugoslavia as a conglomerate of peoples had special diplomatic treatment from UK because of political, economic and military interests of the latter. Mostly after 1948 the UK built good relations with Yugoslavia. Her interest was Yugoslavia to remain stable as it was the west "protected" area from any Soviet Union threat. From this perspective the predictions were that the British could approve of any kind of internal behavior towards other ethnic minority communities. Thus in 1981 riots broke out in the province of Kosovo, Yugoslavia, and they escalated widely all over Kosovo. The UK closely followed all developments through its embassy in Belgrade and reported continuously to the FCO in London. This research will be exclusively based on these Telegrams. The declassified diplomatic reports testify more to a diplomatic and political correctness since then, from the fact that they clearly write about the discrimination that has been done to Kosovo in the Yugoslav legal and political system.
3
Bevan, B. J., e C. D. Bracewell. "Chlamydiosis in birds in Great Britain: 2. Isolations of Chlamydia psittaci from birds sampled between 1976 and 1984". Journal of Hygiene 96, n.º 3 (junho de 1986): 453–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400066237.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
SUMMARYA total of 1531 diagnostic submissions from birds were examined by culture for the presence of Chlamydia psittaci between June 1976 and December 1984 by growth in NCTC 929 clone L mouse fibroblast cells, pretreated with an inhibitor of cell division, followed by direct immunofluorescence microscopy. Of these, 196 were found positive. The continued importance of psittacine birds as potential sources of infection was shown by the high number of positives (139) obtained from birds of that order. The percentage of submissions found positive was highest in parakeets (30·1) and was fairly high in psittacines as a group (16·6), but the latter figure was exceeded by the group ofcollared doves (Streptopelia decaocto) and wood pigeons (Columba palumbus) (25·0). Domestic poultry generally gave low rates, turkeys being the highest.Both the numbers of submissions and their rates of positives increased between 1980 and 1984.Comparing the isolation rates from the various organs sampled, the intestines gave the highest rate (20·4 per cent positive), closely followed by the other internal sites. The superficial swabbed sites (eye, nasal cavity, cloaca) gave lower rates.
4
DRECIN, Mihai D. "FREEMASONRY AND THE PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE (JANUARY 1919 – JUNE 1920)". Annals of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Series on History and Archaeology 12, n.º 2 (2020): 21–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.56082/annalsarscihist.2020.2.21.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The Romanian delegation - headed by Prime Minister Ion I.C. Brătianu - accompanied by other well-known Romanian figures who were not part of the delegation, but represented the Romanian elite who had emigrated to the French capital, attended the Paris Peace Conference and recognised that the political decisions concerning the future borders of the nations emerging from the former Austrian-Hungarian Empire were made by the Roman Catholic Church, the Freemasonry and the Jewish Youth Organisation. These were the institutions behind the political decisions made by the political leaders of France (Georges Clémenceau), Great Britain (Sir David Lloyd George), the United States of America (Woodrow Wilson), and Italy (Vittorio Emanuele Orlando). When, after a conflict with the then French Prime Minister, who was failing to observe the provisions of the August 1916 Treaty concluded between Romania and the Triple Entente, Ion I.C. Brătianu left Paris, Alexandru Vaida-Voevod became his successor as head of the Romanian delegation. The Transylvanian political leader and some of his close associates would also become members of the Ernest Renan Masonic lodge in Paris, on 4 August 1919. The decision was made by Alexandru Vaida-Voevod after extensive consultations with Ion I.C. Brătianu, who had returned to Bucharest by then, and Iuliu Maniu, the Chairman of the Ruling Council in Sibiu. The masonic involvement of the Romanian delegation at the Paris Peace Conference was proof of the diplomatic abilities of its members as well as of the perfect cooperation with the local political decisionmakers, with the purpose of adjusting to the then current international context to the benefit of the country’s national interests. After Romania and Hungary signed the Treaty of Trianon (4 July 1920) whose clauses were favourable to Romania, the Romanian freemasons would leave their Masonic lodges in the coming years.
5
Mirzekhanov, Velikhan. "The Batum Subsystem of International Relations: Problems of Formation and Inter-Imperial Competition, June-August 1918". Novaia i noveishaia istoriia, n.º 4 (2022): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s013038640021032-3.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The implementation of the Treaty of Batum on 4 June 1918 signalled the hegemony of the Ottoman Empire in the macro-region between the Black and Caspian Seas. From the very first days it provoked opposition from other imperial actors, including Germany, an ally of Turkey. In June–July 1918, all the contenders for control of the post-imperial spaces of the former Ottoman Empire were forced to combine coercive and diplomatic means to strengthen their positions, recruiting allies and amassing forces. Due to a number of objective reasons, none of the great powers had the necessary resources to achieve their goals, facing a shortage of both military means and the necessary technical conditions. Their interest in the transformation of the region was extremely high: Germany and Soviet Russia sought to incorporate Transcaucasia into the space of the larger Brest system, while the Entente and the Central Powers were still engaged in a decisive campaign of the Great War, and the Young Turks saw their only chance of implementing their nationalist projects. The hostages of these aspirations were the newly emerged limitrophe states, which were in various stages of formation, on both sides of the Caucasus range. The German mission to Georgia, the Ottoman assistance to Azerbaijan and the Mountainous Republic, and Armenia's hopes for assistance from Britain, Soviet Russia or Austria-Hungary all played a decisive role in their fate. The policy of the great powers was complicated by problems of coalition interaction and systemic trends towards the formation of a coherent geopolitical space following the victory of the Central Powers over the disintegrating Russian Empire and Romania. The peace conference in Constantinople failed to resolve the problem, and the Entente's efforts to re-establish the Eastern Front in parts of the former Russian Empire were growing. Interaction and competition between various actors led to the active integration of the macro-region into the logic of the Great War, so that attempts to diplomatically formalise or revise the Batum subsystem were soon replaced by military confrontation between all the imperial claimants around Baku. The article draws on the diplomatic archives of the former Central Powers to reconstruct the formation of a new subsystem of international relations.
6
Verbytskyi, Volodymyr. "Main Vectors of International Activity of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church". Roczniki Kulturoznawcze 12, n.º 2 (17 de junho de 2021): 71–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rkult21122-4.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
During the 1950s and 1980s, the Eastern Catholic Church (sharing the Byzantine tradition) was maintained in countries with a Ukrainian migrant diaspora. In the 1960s, this branched and organized church was formed in the Ukrainian diaspora. It was named the Ukrainian Catholic Church (UCC). The Galician Metropolitan Department was headed by Andriy Sheptytskyi until 1944, and after that Sheptytskyi was preceded by Yosyp Slipiy, who headed it until 1984. In addition to the Major Archbishop and Metropolitan Yosyp, this church included two dioceses (in the United States and Canada), a total of 18 bishops. It had about 1 million believers and 900 priests. The largest groups of followers of the union lived in France, Yugoslavia, Great Britain, Brazil, Argentina, and Australia. Today, the number of Greek Catholics in the world is more than 7 million.
The international cooperation of denominations in the field of resolving historical traumas of the past seems to be quite productive. An illustrative example was shared on June 28, 2013. Preliminary commemorations of the victims of the 70th anniversary of the Volyn massacres, representatives of the UGCC and the Roman Catholic Church of Poland signed a joint declaration. The documents condemned the violence and called on Poles and Ukrainians to apologize and spread information about the violence. This is certainly a significant step towards reconciliation between the nations.
The most obvious fact is that the churches of the Kyiv tradition—ОCU and UGCC, as well as Protestant churches (All-Ukrainian Union of Evangelical Churches—Pentecostals, Ukrainian Lutheran Church, German People’s Church)—are in favor of deepening the relations between Ukraine and the European Union. A transformation of Ukrainian community to a united Europe, namely in the European Union, which, in their view, is a guarantee of strengthening state sovereignty and ensuring the democratic development of countries and Ukrainian society.
7
Stolyarov, V., O. Shinkaryuk e V. Stolyarova. "Systemic Interaction of Center and Regions in Ukraine (basics of national-civilizational security)". Economic Herald of the Donbas, n.º 4 (62) (2020): 52–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-4(62)-52-63.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The article poses and solves the problem of achieving coordinated interaction between the Center and the Regions as a single, organic and dynamic system of a sovereign independent state. Modern approaches of liberal and planned principles of overcoming bureaucratic and corrupt arbitrariness and urgent resuscitation with intensive revival of economic and vital activity of Ukraine, which is purposefully destroyed under external influence, are considered. The main provisions of the report of the President of France Emmanuel Macron in August 2019 on the Great Fracture in European and world civilization processes are revealed. The main ideas and directions of the Plan of the Great Reset and implementation of the fourth industrial revolution of June 2020 of the Davos World Economic Forum are presented. A meaningful chronology of the formation of the organizational mechanism for the introduction of inclusive capitalism and its management and staffing is given. The equivalence of the principles of homeostasis of economic and biological systems is considered by comparing the restoration of the viability of the global network economy and marine biological systems (on the example of a vampire octopus). Generalized signs of international and state terrorism in Ukraine. The necessity to change the Anglo-Saxon model of open market economy to socially oriented one using the doctrine of 3 "S": social forecasting, social planning and social management is substantiated. It is proposed to use the experience of the United States and Great Britain on social planning and the European financial model of people's capitalism. Based on the proposals of Emelyanov O.S. to enhance the role of the Center in cooperation with the Regions, it is recommended to develop National and Regional Human Development Programs. It is proposed to develop a Planning Code of Ukraine based on the provisions of the model of socially adequate management with encyclopedic criteria for their use at the national and regional levels of government.
8
Ibragimova, Karina R. "he 30th EPIC: The Scottish Ezra Pound. (The 30th Ezra Pound International Conference “Ezra Pound and the Legacy of The Cantos”, Edinburgh, Great Britain, June 27–30, 2023)". Literature of the Americas, n.º 15 (2023): 356–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2023-15-356-364.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The article provides an overview of the 30th international conference “Ezra Pound and the Legacy of The Cantos”. The conference was held at the University of Edinburgh (June 27–30, 2023). The conference was attended by researchers from fifteen countries, including scholars from the USA, China, Germany, France, South Korea, Great Britain, Russia. The forum was attended by over 60 delegates — teachers, scholars, writers, translators. The conference topics covered all aspects of the life and work of Ezra Pound, including not only the main theme of the conference — Pound's global epic The Cantos — but also addressed the study of the American poet’s early poetics, his last years, his opinions on science, politics, history, and the circle of his personal contacts. The main vectors of the conference were (1) Pound’s London years; (2) his Asian (Chinese and Japanese) studies; (3) the legacy of Antiquity, the Middle Ages and the Renaissance in Pound's work; (4) Pound’s image in different world cultures and literatures; (5) the methods of translation used by Pound; (6) different approaches to the analysis of The Cantos. A fruitful and heated discussion was sparked by the topic “Is there a future for Pound studies?” proposed for the roundtable discussion at the final section. One of the most important features of the conference was its focus on the study of not only Pound's poetry, but also on the poetry of contemporary authors: according to the established tradition, the closing panel of the conference was dedicated to poetry readings and subsequent discussion.
9
Saleem, Huma, Almas Iqbal, Sadaf Bukhari e Romana Shaida Durrani. "The Cappuccini Test: an audit of anesthesia supervision". Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care 27, n.º 4 (7 de junho de 2023): 490–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.35975/apic.v27i4.2257.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Background & Objective: Cappuccini test was launched on 22th May 2019, at Royal College of Anesthetists 2019 conference. This is an audit tool to improve the patient safety in anesthesia, based on lessons learned from Frankie Cappuccini’s death. It has been incorporated into standards set by Royal College of Anesthetists and into their hospital accreditation process as a quality improvement tool. We conducted this audit to explore the current status of supervision of trainees in anesthesia in our hospital and to suggest potential improvement of training standards.
Methodology: This prospective audit was conducted in Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. It was conducted for 6 weeks from June 20, 2021 to July 31, 2021. We used the tool kit provided by Royal College of Anesthetists and compared our practicing standards against Royal College of Anesthetists' newly set standard for safety of patients and healthcare staff.
Results: We collected twenty-one operation lists during the audit time period. All these lists had trainees under supervision by a consultant grade anesthetist (100%). In response to questions (1−3 and 6) related to trainees’ knowledge about who was the supervising consultant, how she/he could be contacted if needed, being able to contact and supervisor able to attend if required, were all 100%.
The two questions (4 and 5) were related to supervising consultants, about their awareness of the operating list being supervised by them (90.5%) and accurate description of the nature of the work being supervised by them (81%).
Conclusion: The Cappuccini test is a simple safety and quality improvement tool. It provides assurance that the trainee is working in a safe environment and has full access to contact the supervising consultant. It is a useful indicator of supervision and potential improvement of training standards.
Abbreviations: AAGBI- Association of Anesthetists in Great Britain and Ireland RcoA-Royal College of Anesthetists UK; NCEPOD-National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death
Key words: Cappuccini test; Patient safety; Safer surgery; Supervision
Citation: Saleem H, Iqbal A, Bukhari S, Durrani RS. The Cappuccini Test: an audit of anesthesia supervision. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2023;27(4):490−495; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v27i4.2257
Received: November 27, 2022; Reviewed: June 04, 2023; Accepted: June 07, 2023
10
Myagkov, M. Yu. "USSR in World War II". MGIMO Review of International Relations 13, n.º 4 (4 de setembro de 2020): 7–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-4-73-7-51.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The article offers an overview of modern historical data on the origins, causes of World War II, the decisive role of the USSR in its victorious end, and also records the main results and lessons of World War II.Hitler's Germany was the main cause of World War II. Nazism, racial theory, mixed with far-reaching geopolitical designs, became the combustible mixture that ignited the fire of global conflict. The war with the Soviet Union was planned to be waged with particular cruelty.The preconditions for the outbreak of World War II were the humiliating provisions of the Versailles Peace Treaty for the German people, as well as the attitude of the "Western democracies" to Russia after 1917 and the Soviet Union as an outcast of world development. Great Britain, France, the United States chose for themselves a policy of ignoring Moscow's interests, they were more likely to cooperate with Hitler's Germany than with Soviet Russia. It was the "Munich Agreement" that became the point of no return to the beginning of the Second World War. Under these conditions, for the USSR, its own security and the conclusion of a non-aggression pact with Germany began to come to the fore, defining the "spheres of interests" of the parties in order to limit the advance of German troops towards the Soviet borders in the event of German aggression against Poland. The non-aggression pact gave the USSR just under two years to rebuild the army and consolidate its defensive potential and pushed the Soviet borders hundreds of kilometers westward. The signing of the Pact was preceded by the failure in August 1939 of the negotiations between the military missions of Britain, France and the USSR, although Moscow took the Anglo-French-Soviet negotiations with all seriousness.The huge losses of the USSR in the summer of 1941 are explained by the following circumstances: before the war, a large-scale modernization of the Red Army was launched, a graduate of a military school did not have sufficient experience in managing an entrusted unit by June 22, 1941; the Red Army was going to bleed the enemy in border battles, stop it with short counterattacks by covering units, carry out defensive operations, and then strike a decisive blow into the depths of the enemy's territory, so the importance of a multi-echeloned long-term defense in 1941 was underestimated by the command of the Red Army and it was not ready for it; significant groupings of the Western Special Military District were drawn into potential salients, which was used by the Germans at the initial stage of the war; Stalin's fear of provoking Hitler to start a war led to slowness in making the most urgent and necessary decisions to bring troops to combat readiness.The Allies delayed the opening of the second front for an unreasonably long time. They, of course, achieved outstanding success in the landing operation in France, however, the enemy's losses in only one Soviet strategic operation in the summer of 1944 ("Bagration") are not inferior, and even exceed, the enemy’s losses on the second front. One of the goals of "Bagration" was to help the Allies.Soviet soldiers liberated Europe at the cost of their lives. At the same time, Moscow could not afford to re-establish a cordon sanitaire around its borders after the war, so that anti- Soviet forces would come to power in the border states. The United States and Great Britain took all measures available to them to quickly remove from the governments of Italy, France and other Western states all the left-wing forces that in 1944-1945 had a serious impact on the politics of their countries.
Livros sobre o assunto "Great Britain. 1878 June 4"
1
George, Marcus Sebastian. The Cyprus Convention policy & its impact upon the integrity of the Ottoman Empire. London]: Centre of Near and Middle Eastern Studies, University of London, 2000.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
2
R, Gardner W. J., e Great Britain. Admiralty. Historical Section., eds. The evacuation from Dunkirk: Operation Dynamo, 26 May-4 June 1940. London: F. Cass, 2000.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
3
Britain), National Gallery (Great. The artist's eye: Patrick Caulfield : an exhibition of National Gallery paintings selected by the artist, 4 June-10 August 1986. London: National Gallery, 1986.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
4
Ramsbottom, Harry. Memory diary: An account of his service from June 1940 to May 1943 with 4 Squadron Middlesex Yeomanry (Signals) attached to 4th County of London Yeomanry (Sharpshooters). Epsom: Chiavari, 1995.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
5
Britain), National Gallery (Great. The artist's eye: Patrick Caulfield : an exhibition of National Gallery paintings selected by the artist : 4 June - 10 August 1986 : supported by Shell U.K. Limited. London: The National Gallery, 1986.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
6
Treaties, United States. Treaty Between the United States and Great Britain: Claims, Fisheries, Navigation of the St. Lawrence, Etc., American Lumber on the River St. John, ... June 17, 1871; Proclaimed July 4, 1871. Forgotten Books, 2017.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
7
Jansson, Maija. Proceedings of the Long Parliament, Volume 4: House of Commons, Volume 4: 19 April - 5 June 1641 (Proceedings of the English Parliament). University of Rochester Press, 2003.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
8
Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons. Sessional Returns Session 2014-15: 4 June 2014-30 March 2015. Stationery Office, The, 2015.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
9
Tso. Parliamentry Debates, House of Commons - Bound Volumes, 1995-96, 24 June-4 July 1996 (Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)). Bernan Assoc, 1997.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
10
Emigration From The United Kingdom To America Lists Of Passengers Arriving At Us Ports June 1878 May 1879. Scarecrow Press, 2010.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteCapítulos de livros sobre o assunto "Great Britain. 1878 June 4"
1
Davis, Derek H. "The Continent Al Congress and Religious Liberty". In Religion and the Continent Al Congress 1774-1789, 151–74. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195133554.003.0009.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Abstract Many of the colonial leaders who led the independence movement had in mind from the beginning both political and religious freedom. Two late colonial actions reflect this emphasis. First was the Massachusetts legislature’s call on 17 June 1774 for the convening of the First Continental Congress. Among the purposes stated in this appeal, as noted in chapter 4, was that the colonial representatives should devise measures “for the recovery and establishment of their just rights and liberties, civil and religious.”1 The second action occurred the following year, when the New York Provincial Congress resolved that “neither the Parliament of Great Britain, nor any other earthly legislature or tribunal, ought or can of right interfere or interpose in anywise howsoever in the religious and ecclesiastical concerns of the colonies.”2 These two actions reveal the early commitment of the colonial leaders to religious liberty, at least leaving to each colony its own independence from the king and Parliament in matters of religion.
2
Kelly, James. "Breakthrough". In The Oxford History of British and Irish Catholicism, Volume III, 31–48. Oxford University PressOxford, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843443.003.0003.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Abstract The withdrawal in 1766 of papal recognition of the Stuarts’ claim to the throne of Britain and Ireland paved the way for the repeal of the penal laws. Irish Catholics were better organized than their British equivalents in the 1760s, but enduring anti-Catholic sentiment, animated by a combination of historical memory and contemporary events, ensured no progress was made until the early 1770s when the Irish and Westminster parliaments approved measures—an Oath of Allegiance and the Quebec Act most notably—that held out the promise that legislation to repeal the penal laws might soon follow. Military and political calculations, spurred by the exigencies of the American War of Independence provided the context for breakthrough acts in 1778 but the contrasting reactions of public opinion in both jurisdictions determined what was to follow. In Ireland, optimistic hopes that an era of religious toleration and political accommodation beckoned resulted in additional relief measures in 1782, but efforts to extend the franchise to Catholics in 1783–4 aroused atavistic fears for the Protestant constitution that ensured no further relief was forthcoming during the 1780s. In Great Britain, meanwhile, opposition in Scotland to the reliefs agreed at Westminster in 1778 prompted an outbreak of ‘no popery’, peaking in the Gordon Riots in London in June 1780. This underlined the enduring strength of anti-Catholic sentiment there and, by encouraging a much chastened Catholic leadership to rethink its approach, exposed divisions within Catholic ranks.