Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Galerei͡a "Romanov" (Moscow, Russia)"
Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos
Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Galerei͡a "Romanov" (Moscow, Russia)".
Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.
Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Galerei͡a "Romanov" (Moscow, Russia)"
1
Yahshiyan, Oleg Y. "Community Tradition in Pre-Romanov Russia". RUDN Journal of Public Administration 10, n.º 1 (30 de março de 2023): 29–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2023-10-1-29-37.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The understanding of the basic laws of the political history of Russia will be obviously incomplete without a scientific understanding of the role of the community (agricultural, rural, peasant) in the development of national statehood at each appropriate stage. The unity and continuity of the national history up to and including the Soviet period was ensured by the reproduction of the community in its various concrete historical forms. The way out of the most significant points of bifurcation in the history of Russia is inextricably linked with the communal tradition: the revival of the national statehood both after the overthrow of the Horde yoke, and during the overcoming of the Troubles of the beginning of the XVII century. The article is devoted to the consideration of community tradition as a long-term factor in the history of national statehood. The markers of the civilizational specificity of Russia associated with the community (attitude to private property, neighborly character) are emphasized. The view of the politogenesis of the Eastern Slavs and the statehood of the lands of pre-Mongol Russia as the formation and development of a system of subordinate communities is consistently substantiated. The inclusion of the estate self-government of the tyagly posadsky and volost worlds in the system of state administration of Moscow Russia as a grassroots administration is revealed.
2
Dunning, Chester. "James I, the Russia Company, and the Plan to Establish a Protectorate Over North Russia". Albion 21, n.º 2 (1989): 206–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4049926.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
In the decade preceding the establishment of the Romanov dynasty in 1613, Muscovite Russia went through a catastrophic period known as the Time of Troubles which was characterized by political unrest, famine, regicide, social upheaval, and foreign intervention. In the final, darkest years of the Time of Troubles many people doubted that Muscovy, which for a time lacked a ruler or even a central government, would be able to survive as an independent state. It appeared more likely that Catholic Poland would conquer the country or that Sweden would come to dominate it. The English, who had established diplomatic and commercial relations with Muscovy in the 1550s and who watched events there with considerable interest, were horrified by reports that the Poles had captured Moscow, that the Swedes had seized much Russian territory, and that factions of the Muscovite lords were negotiating with their aggressive neighbors for a foreign tsar. This eventually led the English to contemplate acquiring North Russia and the commercially important port of Arkhangel'sk for themselves. As strange as it seems, for a brief period of time King James I actually dreamed of adding part of Muscovy to his “empire.”
3
Granin, Yuriy D. "“Civilization” and civilizational Evolution of Russia". Civilization studies review 3, n.º 1 (2021): 81–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/2713-1483-2021-3-1-81-98.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The report analyzes the problem of the civilizational evolution of Russia on the basis of the use of a set of ideas of F.A. Tolstoy. Brodel, P. Sorokin, S. Eisenstadt, K. Jaspers, and other specialists. The content of the term “civilization” is discussed. “Civilization” is interpreted by the author as a socio-philosophical category to denote the diversity of cultural and historical types of development of economically and politically connected large communities of people and/or their aggregates (communities), subjectively and symbolically integrated into a relatively unified whole through historical and social imagination, cultural meanings, values and norms that serve as the cause, purpose and basis for the organization and functioning of these communities. This definition is concretized by revealing the dialectics of the relationship of social, cultural, cognitive and institutional components of “civilization” using the example of Russia in the historical range from Kievan Rus to the modern Russian Federation. The most important institutional factors in the formation and development of civilizations, their interaction and expansion over long distances were “universal States” – “kingdoms” and “empires”. Studying the formation and development of the Grand Duchy of Moscow, the Russian Empire and the USSR, the author comes to the conclusion that historically these political forms had several civilizational embodiments: the “Orthodox civilization” of the Moscow Kingdom (XVI–XVII centuries), the “civilizational pseudo-morphosis” of the Romanov Empire in the XVIII and mid-XIX century, the “hybrid modern civilization” of Russia on the eve of the First World War, and the “Soviet civilization”, which represented an alternative type of modern (industrial and value-semantic) development to the West. Modern Russia, of course, inherits it. But it doesnʼt have a meta-ideology that unites peoples, and it doesnʼt have claims, like the United States, to global dominance. Rather, it is a civilizational hybrid, fancifully combining elements of the archaic, Soviet past and Western modernity.
4
Rabinovich, Yakov N., e Yury N. Smirnov. "Service People of the Border Fortress on the Volga at the Beginning of Mikhail Romanov’s Reign". History 19, n.º 1 (2020): 60–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-1-60-70.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The Volga cities played an important role during the Time of Troubles, but the history of Samara has not been studied enough. There is practically no information about the voivodes and the garrison of Samara from 1602 to 1614. Newly discovered sources allow to correct this gap in historiography. It is known that there were 300 gunmen in Samara and 205 gunmen came to Samara from the destroyed Saratov. Despite the frequent change of power in Moscow, Samara remained loyal to the central authorities, particularly to Tsar Mikhail Romanov elected in 1613. False Dmitry II and his son Ivan (“Vorionok”) from Marina Mnishek, who failed to gain recognition in Moscow, did not receive support in Samara. The consistent identification of the Samara garrison and its commanders with the supreme authority served as a defense against internal unrest. In the face of an external threat, this factor saved Samara from the fate of Saratov and Tsaritsyn that disappeared during the Time of Troubles. Also the courage of the defenders of Samara was supported by the prophecy of Alexy, Metropolitan of Moscow, stated that the enemy would never capture this city. The article shows that in the Time of Troubles, the Samara fortress continued to be a reliable outpost on the southeastern border of Russia. The fortress had to play an important role, first of all, in the fight against internal enemies. After the liberation of Moscow from the invaders and the election of Mikhail Romanov as the Tsar ataman Zarutsky made the last serious attempt to struggle against the new dynasty in the Volga region. Before the government army went on the offensive in 1614, the rebel movement was restrained by the Samara garrison and by its voivode D. P. Pozharsky-Lopata. They also contributed to ensuring ties with the countries of the East, to the restoration of the Volga route, and eventually to the revival of national statehood. After 1614 the Samara authorities returned to “routine” duties to protect trade routes from robbers instead of fighting against the dangerous anti-government movement.
5
BELINSKAYA, N. I. "GLORIFICATION OF THE IVERON ICON OF THE MOTHER OF GOD IN ARCHITECTURE (BASED ON MATERIALS FROM THE OREL PROVINCE)". JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AND MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION 12, n.º 3 (2023): 108–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/2225-8272-2023-12-3-108-123.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The purpose of the article is to consider the features of the glorification of the Iveron Icon of the Mother of God in the architecture of the period of the Grand Ducal Couple Sergei Alexandrovich Romanov and Elizaveta Feodorovna Romanova. The article describes the history of two architec-tural projects to glorify the Moscow shrine – the Iveron Icon of the Mother of God, embodied with the partici-pation of the Moscow Governor-General, Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, Grand Duchess Elizabeth Feodorovna, as well as representatives from their entourage. The significant contribution of Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich to the development of the "Russian style" in architecture is mentioned, and individual architects and engineers – to its popularization in the Russian province. The decisive role of the Moscow Governor-General, Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, in the creative fate of some architects and engineers is traced. The methodology of studying this topic includes a number of stages and approaches, which may vary depending on the specific task in the study. As a result, the author concludes that the spread of the "Russian style" in the regions of Russia was due to the state patronage and the highest support of this architectural direction.
6
Abdurasulov, Ulfat, e Paolo Sartori. "At the Coronation! A Khivan Ambassador Makes It to Moscow (1762)". Journal of Central Asian History 1, n.º 1 (5 de maio de 2022): 158–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/27728668-12340005.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Abstract Based on documentary material collected from the archives in Astrakhan and Moscow, the present article sheds light on a Khivan embassy to Moscow in 1762 for the coronation of Empress Catherine II. Prior to this diplomatic mission, Khivan diplomats had sought with little success to be granted access to the Romanovs’ court. While this mission was little different from those that preceded it, the political circumstances in Russia within which it took place were significantly distinct; and against this political backdrop, the mission seems to have acquired unexpected significance. Indeed, the visit of the Khivan envoy in 1762 was clearly welcomed by Catherine herself who, lacking any legal claim to the Romanov throne – either by heredity or by designation – was eager to attract as many foreign emissaries to her coronation ceremony as possible. Yet the proposals of the Khivan envoy regarding the current state of trade across the Caspian Sea elicited great interest and were embraced by some factions at court. In this article we recount the story of this embassy and present several documents originally written in eighteenth-century Cyrillic handwriting (skoropis’) which surround this specific diplomatic encounter.
7
VАRENTSOVA, Larisa Yu. "PALACE AGRICULTURE IN RUSSIA IN THE 17TH CENTURY". Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates 6, n.º 3 (2020): 118–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.21684/2411-197x-2020-6-3-118-136.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Throughout the 17th century, the Palace economy developed dynamically in the Royal fiefdoms, which by the middle — the second half of the 17th century were characterized by high profitability. The Palace lands provided the Romanov House with everything it needed. The components of the Palace economy included agriculture, fishing grounds, and manufacturing facilities. At the same time, the Royal manufactories were not numerous, the fishing grounds were not in all the sovereign’s fiefdoms, only agriculture dominated everywhere. The relevance of this work lies in studying the historical experience of socio-economic and political development of the Russian state in the 17th century. The purpose of the article is to consider Palace agriculture in Russia in the 17th century. The methodological basis of the study relies on the principles of historicism and scientific objectivity. The author has used the works by russian pre-revolutionary historians V. N. Tatishchev, S. M. Solovyov, and M. Baranovsky, as well as the works of researchers of the soviet and post-soviet periods S. I. Volkov, V. I. Buganov, V. A. Korostelev, and A. V. Topychkanov. The novelty of the research consists in the introduction of new historical sources into scientific circulation. The source database consists of the unpublished office documents from the Armory chamber fund 396, the Palace department fund 1239 of the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts (RGADA, Moscow), as well as from the rare handwritten and old-printed books fund of the Moscow state United art historical, architectural and natural landscape museum-reserve. Among the published sources, we can distinguish a group of office documents. These are census, parish, and expense books of orders of Secret Affairs and the Grand Palace. In addition, the author has used the historical and geographical materials of the 17th — early 18th century from the books of the Discharge Order and the memoirs by the german traveler A. Oleary. The results show the place of Palace agriculture in the economy of the Tsar’s domain in Russia in the 17th century. The author has identified the main directions in the development of agriculture on the territory of the Palace fiefdoms. Having studied the attempt to modernize the Palace agriculture during the reign of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich and to use the best european experience, this research highlights the significance of the Secret Affairs Order, which was in charge of many agricultural objects in the second half of the 17th century; their geographical coordinates are indicated. The author reveals the main features of the development of Palace grain farming, horticulture, animal husbandry, poultry farming, and beekeeping. The examples of farming in some Tsar’s villages of the Moscow Region showcase the ways of providing labor for the main objects of agriculture in the Tsar’s domain. The agricultural products from the Royal fiefdoms were intended for the Royal family. To a lesser extent, they were sent for sale on the domestic market. Different Royal fiefdoms specialized in particular fields. Namely, Izmailovo, Chashnikovo, Alekseevskoye, Stepanovskoye, Ekaterininskaya Grove, and Yermolino Palace villages near Moscow supplied rye, oats, wheat, hops, flax, and hemp. Grape, fruit, and mulberry orchards were bred in Chuguev, Astrakhan, Bryansk, and the Moscow Region. Russian and German specialists were involved in their service. The Palace villages Pachino, Alekseevskoe, Stepanovski, Ermolino, situated near Moscow, and the villages Lyskovo and Murashkino near Nizhny Novgorod were the centres of the Palace livestock. Tsar’s apiaryies were in Karpovka, Volnovsky, Kharkiv, Chuguyev, Olesinska, and Hotnichescom counties. Palace agriculture was served using the forced labor of palace peasants and posadsky people, soldiers, archers, while only small amounts of hired labor were involved.
8
Volodko, Anna. "“Under the Romanovs’ Sceptre: the 300th Anniversary of Russia's Proclamation as an Empire”. “Russian Charity. Tradition and Modernity”. Review of International and Interregional Scientific Conferences". ISTORIYA 12, n.º 12-2 (110) (2021): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.18254/s207987840019095-3.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
A review of international/inter-regional scientific conferences held by the Institute of General History of the Russian Academy of Sciences in cooperation with the Foundation for the Revival of Traditions of Charity and Charity “St. Elisabethan and St. Sergius Educational Society” (ESPS Foundation) in 2021 is presented. In connection with the momentous historical date — the 300th anniversary of the proclamation of Russia as an empire — scientific conferences were held “Under the Romanovs' sceptre: on the 300th anniversary of the proclamation of Russia as an empire» with thematic blocks: “The Russian Empire: Projection to the West” (Kaliningrad), “The Imperial House of Romanov and the Inclusion of New Lands and Peoples in the Cultural and Civilisational Space of the Russian Empire” (Perm) and “The Russian Empire in Comparison with Other Empires of the East and West” (Kazan). There was also an international scientific and practical conference entitled “Russian Charity. Traditions and Modernity” (Kazan), whose scientific reports focused on the development of charity in Russia in the first half of the 19th and early 20th centuries. More than 300 leading scientists-historians, archivists, representatives of the museum community from Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Perm, Kaliningrad, Voronezh, the Republic of Tatarstan, the Republic of Crimea and the CIS countries took part in the events.
9
Matasova, T. A. "St. Cassian of Uchma and His Canonization at the Time of Mikhail Romanov: Trust in the Spiritual Authorities". Administrative Consulting, n.º 2 (15 de março de 2022): 153–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-2-153-164.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The article examines the circumstances and significance of the canonization of St. Cassian of Uchma in 1629. Based on a wide range of sources (the life of St. Cassian in its various copies and editions, as well as the “books of the foundation” of the Assumption Church of the Cassian Monastery, wills of Russian princes and other documents), analyzed by the classical methods of historical science (retrospective, method of historical periodization, historical-genetic, historical-systemic), it was possible to come to the conclusion that in the information about the life and miracles of St. Cassian, the central government drew important ideas necessary to overcome the crisis of statehood and power generated by the Time of Troubles. For the consolidation of the huge country of the central government, it was extremely important to apply to the images of the righteous defenders who discovered their holiness in the regions. After the end of the intervention, it was no less important to emphasize that Russia, in spite of everything, was an integral part of the common European cultural space. The figure of St. Cassian, a “Greco-Roman” saint by origin, whose appearance in Russia is associated with the arrival of Sophia Palaeologina in Moscow (1472), fully reached these important national goals.
10
Kashin, Dmitry V. "Procession of the Moscow embassy on March 14, 1613 to Hypatian Monastery: versions of the event". Vestnik of Kostroma State University 28, n.º 1 (20 de abril de 2022): 21–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-1-21-25.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The article discusses two options for describing the events of March 14, 1613, in Kostroma, which marked the beginning of the calling of M.F. Romanov to become Tsar Michael of Russia. The first version is based on the “Tale of Avraamy Palitsyn” and speaks of two processions – the embassy of the Assembly of Moscow Land, which set off from the suburb village of Selishche, and Kostroma clergy and citizens, who left the city proper; uniting near the Monastery of St. Hypatius of Gangra; the participants of those processions went to the mother and son the Romanovs. The second version is based on the text of the New Chronicler – Moscow embassy came from the village of Selishche to Kostroma Kremlin and only then, having taken from the Assumption Cathedral the Icon of the Mother of God dedicated to Saint Theodore Stratelates, went to Hypatian Monastery. Arguments are given in favour of the second option, implying the personal interest of Avraamy Palitsyn, cellarer of the St. Sergius Trinity Monastery, in hushing up the role played by the said image of Our Most Holy Lady in begging Miсhael to become the tsar. It is noted that an objective description of the events of March 14, 1613, is of particular topicality as the cathedral of Kostroma Kremlin is being under reconstruction.
Livros sobre o assunto "Galerei͡a "Romanov" (Moscow, Russia)"
1
K, Zhuravlev, e Radionov Valentin, eds. Shedevry Gosudarstvennoĭ Tretʹi︠a︡kovskoĭ galerei. [Moskva]: Gos. Tretʹi︠a︡kovskai︠a︡ galerei︠a︡, 1994.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
2
Chini︠a︡kova, G. P. "Rimskai︠a︡" ikona Presvi︠a︡toĭ Bogorodit︠s︡y iz khrama vo imi︠a︡ svi︠a︡togo Grigorii︠a︡ Neokesariĭskogo, chto na Bolʹshoĭ Poli︠a︡nke: Sobranie Gosudarstvennoĭ Tretʹi︠a︡kovskoĭ Galerei. Moskva: Severnyĭ palomnik, 2009.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
3
Bobrovnit͡skai͡a, I. A. (Irina Akimovna), compiler e Gosudarstvennye muzei Moskovskogo Kremli͡a, eds. Venchanii︠a︡ na t︠s︡arstvo i koronat︠s︡ii v Moskovskom Kremle: Coronations of tsars and emperors at the Moscow Kremlin. Moskva: Izdanie Muzeev Moskovskogo Kremli︠a︡, 2013.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
4
Vasʹkin, Aleksandr Anatolʹevich. Moskva pri Romanovykh: K 400-letii︠u︡ t︠s︡arskoĭ dinastii Romanovykh. Moskva: Sputnik+, 2013.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
5
Lukʹi͡anov, E. A., e T. G. Igumnova. Romanovy. Portret dinastii: T͡sarskiĭ i velikokni͡azheskiĭ portret v sobranii Istoricheskogo muzei͡a. Moskva: Gosudarstvennyĭ istoricheskiĭ muzeĭ, 2013.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
6
Gorbacheva, T. P. Petrovskiĭ putevoĭ dvoret︠s︡. Moskva: Lingva-F, 2014.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
7
Paltusova, I. N. Dary Rossiĭskogo Imperatorskogo Doma Istoricheskomu muzei︠u︡. Moskva: Gosudarstvennyĭ istoricheskiĭ muzeĭ, 2014.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
8
Topychkanov, A. V. Povsednevnai︠a︡ zhiznʹ Kolomenskogo dvort︠s︡a vtoroĭ poloviny XVII veka. Moskva: MGOMZ, 2011.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
9
Unknown. Michael Nikitich Romanov. Life feat prisoner of the royal dynasty and historical sketch of the era / Printed with the blessing of His Holiness Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Alexy II / Mikhail Nikitich Romanov. Zhiznennyy podvig uznika tsarskoy dinastii i istoricheskiy ocherk epokhi / Pechataetsya po blagosloveniyu Svyateyshego Patriarkha Moskovskogo i vseya Rusi Alexiya II. Novospasskiy monastyr, 2009.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
10
Riegg, Stephen Badalyan. Russia's Entangled Embrace. Cornell University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501750113.001.0001.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
This book traces the relationship between the Romanov state and the Armenian diaspora that populated Russia's territorial fringes and navigated the tsarist empire's metropolitan centers. By engaging the ongoing debates about imperial structures that were simultaneously symbiotic and hierarchically ordered, the book helps us to understand how, for Armenians and some other subjects, imperial rule represented not hypothetical, clear-cut alternatives but simultaneous, messy realities. The book examines why, and how, Russian architects of empire imagined Armenians as being politically desirable. These circumstances included the familiarity of their faith, perceived degree of social, political, or cultural integration, and their actual or potential contributions to the state's varied priorities. Based on extensive research in the archives of St. Petersburg, Moscow, and Yerevan, the book reveals that the Russian government relied on Armenians to build its empire in the Caucasus and beyond. Analyzing the complexities of this imperial relationship—beyond the reductive question of whether Russia was a friend or foe to Armenians—allows us to study the methods of tsarist imperialism in the context of diasporic distribution, interimperial conflict and alliance, nationalism, and religious and economic identity.
Capítulos de livros sobre o assunto "Galerei͡a "Romanov" (Moscow, Russia)"
1
Banerjee, Samiran. "Leo Hurwicz". In The Collected Papers of Leonid Hurwicz, 3–16. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199313280.003.0001.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
This chapter provides a biography of Leonid Hurwicz. Hurwicz was born on August 21, 1917 in Moscow, Russia, at a time of historical tumult, in-between the February revolution that overthrew the Romanov dynasty and the October revolution that ushered in the Soviet Union. From 1934–38, he attended the University of Warsaw, earning an L.L.M. (Magister Utriusque Iuris), a Master of Laws degree in both civil and canon law. This was to be the only degree that Hurwicz officially earned in his life. He also studied at the University of Chicago and Harvard, and taught mathematics and other courses in the electronics program of the U.S. Army Signal Corps at the Illinois Institute of Technology in 1941. During 1948, he was on the staff of the research division of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe in Geneva. Outside of his academic career, Hurwicz was a lifelong Democrat.
2
Mikaberidze, Alexander. "A Boy from Pskov Province, 1747–1762". In Kutuzov, 3—C1.P38. Oxford University PressNew York, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197546734.003.0001.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Abstract This chapter begins by recounting the birth of Mikhail in September 1747 into the Russian noble family of the Golenischev-Kutuzovs. The Golenischev-Kutuzovs were a junior branch of the Kutuzovs, a family that could trace its origins back to the Middle Ages. The General Armory of the Nobility of the Russian Empire, the authoritative record of Russian noble households, notes that the family’s founder was Gavriil, who migrated from Prussia to the Novgorod region in the second half of the thirteenth century. The chapter highlights how the Kutuzovs and their Golenischev-Kutuzov cousins prospered through the years, serving as diplomats, palace officials, and military commanders. They contributed to the rise of the Grand Duchy of Moscow and its transformation into the Czardom of Russia. The family fortunes were somewhat revived with the success of Ivan Savinovich Golenischev-Kutuzov, who distinguished himself in several wars waged by the newly installed Romanov czars.