Teses / dissertações sobre o tema "Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Sujet (philosophie)"
Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos
Veja os 29 melhores trabalhos (teses / dissertações) para estudos sobre o assunto "Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Sujet (philosophie)".
Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.
Veja as teses / dissertações das mais diversas áreas científicas e compile uma bibliografia correta.
Ségura, Philip. "Michel Foucault : l'espace non-dialectique". Paris 8, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA083689.
Texto completo da fonteThe objective was to understand from the sentence of Michel Foucault: "Je n'accepte pas ce mot, dialectique. Non et non ! Il faut que les choses soient bien claires. Dès que l'on prononce le mot "dialectique" on commence à accepter, même si on ne le dit pas, le schéma hégélien de la thèse et de l'antithèse, et avec lui une forme de logique qui me paraît inadéquate, si l'on veut donner de ces problèmes une description vraiment concrète. ", the movement coming from the thought determinations which would go from the plan of immanence towards the modes of conceptualization. Many philosophers allotted to Foucault various periods of evolution of his thinking. I started my study by presupposing that Foucault worked throughout his life around the same level of immanence and that he continuously tried to explain it starting from the knowledge of various socio-history disciplines. And I tried to understand this movement which goes from the level of immanence to a conceptualization of his thinking built around the critical tradition. Foucault wants to proof that philosophy constructed the subject and a system of the human conscience. The dialectics presents itself as the central point of this system. How to understand the presence of the concept by knowing that above all it is the result of the overlapping connection of subject in the socio-history thinking?
Adorno, Francesco. "Vérité et sujet chez Michel Foucault". Paris 8, 1995. http://www.theses.fr/1995PA080974.
Texto completo da fonteThe works of foucault bring about an ensemble of problems in which we tried to treat in this work. From one period to another, we encounter a diversity of tone, style and subject among the works the destination and purpose seem uncertain. In particular, two moments reflect this discontinuity: between l'archeologie du savoir et surveiller et punir, foucault changes or seems to change methods; between la volonte de savoir et l'usage des plaisirs et le souci de soi, the project even of a story of sexuality seems to orient itself in a different way. In our opinion, the changes which accent foucault's path represent different moments of the same questioning that can be explained in different ways, but does not constitute less of a coherent path. In our opinion, foucault's fundamental problem was always disecting the processes of subject formation, and making clearer the knowledge which discreetly participates in his constitution. This hypothesis is based on the research of "literary" works: a collection of articles by literary critics; on the other hand we studied the inedited between 1976 and 1984. The first part of this research allowed us to confirm that already at the beginning of the 60's, foucault thought about a series of concepts that will be the basis of his archeo-genealogical method. The second part of this work allowed us to establish the existance of a certain graduality between 1976 and 1984 : in l'usage des plaisirs, foucault does not mention the genealogy of. .
Abe, Takashi. "La méthode archéologique de Michel Foucault : le statut du sujet". Paris 10, 2006. http://www.theses.fr/2006PA100006.
Texto completo da fonteIn this study, the works of Foucault were chronologically examined. Analysis was made on the development of his philosophical method known as archaeology, and on its dominant topic : the subject. Foucault treated the concept of subject as an operational concept, through which his research was realized. Through the 1960s, in parallel with the development of archaeology, he criticized the epistemic function of the subject, which was the very basis of Human Sciences. At the end of the 1960s, through a radical reconstruction of the archaeological method, he discovered a new object of research the discourse. On the basis of such methodological change, the new research examined the status of the subject differently. The concept of "subjectification" was introduced in order to describe a dynamic process interrelated with the function of power, in which subjectivity is formed. This process of subjectification further introduced the dimension of ethics
Kozlowski, Michal. "Fonctions du discours et figures du sujet : Michel Foucault, théoricien de la liberté". Paris, EHESS, 2004. http://www.theses.fr/2004EHES0073.
Texto completo da fonteMichel Foucault is often perceived as the one willing to deconstruct the very idea of the subject. In my analysis I attempt to show the contrary. Foucault's cautious work aims at the reconstruction of the concept of the subject in order to think it through both it its limitations and the possibilities to realiza its freedom. In that perspective I account for two key notions that Foucault works out : the one of the actuality abd the one of the genealogy. I introduce in Foucault theoretical structure the spinozian concept of conatus understood, as permanent will of the self-constitution of a subject by the subject. These three notions together let me account for political strategies of emancipation in the Foucaultian sense. The main argument developed in my dissertation leads to the conclusion that Michel Foucault far from being a new conservatism offers as a matter of the new visions of progressivism, a skeptical one perhaps but genuinely mature
Lemoine, Simon. "Contributions à une philosophie du dispositif, Usages de Foucault". Poitiers, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011POIT5012.
Texto completo da fonteA significant part of human relations is unthought. Those invisible relations, are diffuse, heterogeneous, variegated, mediated, delayed, amplified, hybridized, beyond the thinking-understanding. In many places, those relations turn to the advantage of mechanisms. In other words, they lead the subject to do thousands of things that he would not have done on his own, and also gradually modeled the subject according to their goals (they have gradually modeled a subject ergonomic, persistent, oriented, etc. ). Those determined relations are taking place largely in the microphysical dimension, usually neglected. A careful study of mechanisms brings us to perceive the existence and importance of that largely unexplored continent
Hong, Ki-Sook. "Problématique du sujet et ontologie chez Deleuze". Paris 8, 2006. http://www.theses.fr/2006PA082644.
Texto completo da fonteOur research consists in analysis about the concept of subject which intervenes in the event and must be faithful in the new situation after the event. We examine most of all the problem of ontology for this analysis, because we want to define the concept of subject as the name which is different than ontology’s term. We choose G. Deleuze who is a philosopher contemporary. That is, our research clarifies in development of Deleuze’s ontology and subject. The study is divided into six sections. 1) Investigation of the concept of subject today, ontology, and the question of subject and ontology in Deleuze 2) multiples heterogeneous as pure becoming 3) event and sense 4) champ of virtual 5) time and its sovereignty 6) inside of thought: “subjectivation”. Our conception of the subject which is distant from Deleuze’s thought is decided by the singular topology where the chance of the event is material of the subject and the truth
Combes, Muriel. "La vie inséparée : vie et sujet entre biopouvoir et politique". Paris 8, 2002. http://octaviana.fr/document/18047362X#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0.
Texto completo da fonteBetween 1976 and 1979, Michel Foucault elaborates the concept of "biopower", which indicates the moment when, around the 18th century, life itself - the individuals and the populations - becomes part of the mechanisms of power and an essential stake in politics. At the beginning of the eighties, Foucault's work seems to branch out into a reflection about ethics. Rather than a rupture, one can see appearing a fundamental quadrilateral of concepts, which joins together truth, power, subject and life. Among those concepts, the one which has interested Foucault least is the one of life. In order to elaborate it, we've taken here two ways: a renewal of an ontological mode of thought, in order to clarify the relationship between life and subjectivity and an explanation of the function of sciences in biopower necessitating a critique of epistemology. Our aim is to question the involvement of life in politics. In each case, the assumption in play is that life cannot be conceived separately from subjectivity
Fujita, Kojiro. "Pour une philosophie de la subjectivation. Etude sur Michel Foucault". Thesis, Paris Est, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PESC0002/document.
Texto completo da fonteThis thesis seeks to shed light on the philosophy of the subjectivation in the work of Michel Foucault. From our perspective, the early Foucault (from Madness and Civilization to The Order of Things) strived to overcome the philosophy of the subject in order to advance a thought of anonymity, but the later Foucault (from The Archaeology of Knowledge to The History of Sexuality) attempted to take up the problem of the subject again beyond that anonymity so as to finally elaborate the concept of subjectivation. Hence, our thesis inquires how the later Foucault continued to re-examine the subject in three anonymous domains – knowledge, power and ethics –, in order to extract from Foucault’s works what one can finally call the philosophy of the subjectivation. Thus this philosophy consists of three elements: the logic of the subjectivation, the politics of the subjectivation and the ethics of the subjectivation. Since most existing studies are related to the later element, our thesis is primarily devoted to the former two. The first half of the thesis addresses the logic of the subjectivation to reveal our existence in the system of knowledge, and the second half deals with the politics of the subjectivation to reveal our existence in that of power. Theses researches can no longer be accomplished by traditional thoughts (realism of scientific objectivity, phenomenology of transcendental subjectivity, epistemology of ideal forms, hermeneutics of fundamental meaning, etc.), which are never foreign to the philosophy of the subject, but only by Foucault’s thought itself, which is well destined to the philosophy of the subjectivation. Thus, our thesis reads Foucault’s thought by this same thought itself in order to extract the philosophy of the subjectivation from there. However, ultimately, it not only explores the concept of subjectivation, but also paradoxically sheds light on what one can call the “counter-subjectivation”
Jacinthe, Fodnot. "L’éthique publique, de l’équité de la justice chez Rawls à la norme, la biopolitique et la vérité chez Foucault". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022PA080087.
Texto completo da fonteMy public ethics as a reflection between humanity and sovereignty shows a double contribution of the political subject and the state in the production of the values that we need collectively. The political subject brings a word or a speech inspired by the human fundamental needs and the human conditional of life. The human point of view discussed inside this work is also understood by the rawlsian inviolability of the person and the human rights as priority which express a lot of preoccupations toward mankind as dignified creatures. Moreover, the foucaldian biopolitics suggests a system of state control of the mankind as a biological being and also taking care of their human nature. The dynamism of the political subject is not able to weaken the state encouragement to increase the power, his enlightenment and his influence, and his perpetuity. The public ethics set up a space of justification and legitimization of the public decisions and the behavior of every body. That will be in the advantage of the well-being of the community collectively and the comfort of everybody specially when the commitment of the political subject brings him to tell the truth about himself, his life and the condition of life. John Rawls by his equity and his justice system provides values giving man and woman access to comfort and well-being in his well organized society against all sense of utilitarianism. Because, a society with constitutional democracy provides a system of values previously accepted for the absolute respect of the person, from which perceiving the equitable distribution of property (fundamental liberties, the distribution of the resources and the country’s wealth on the profit of desadvantaged and poor people, and values aiming for durable political consensus). Even though, the political and legal reality, the constancy of the fight justify mostly the effectiveness of those values
Koll, Peter. "Risque et naturalité. De la naissance de l'objet 'société' et la (dé-)subjectivation : une généalogie". Paris 8, 2011. http://octaviana.fr/document/156506394#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0.
Texto completo da fonteThe object of the following text appears as a genealogy of risk. This appearance is conveyed first through a reading of the sociological meaning risk has taken, according to which risk concerns the very structure of modern society. Thus the genealogy we undertake will concern the birth of the object called 'society', which indeed appears firstly as a new type of objectivity. In order to grasp the meaning of this latter concept, understood as a discursive function, we propose to 'read' – in the texts of so-called classical sociology – "society" as a function on a (discursive) field of naturality. Based on this thesis an account is developed of the paradoxical nature of naturality, which paradox can be expressed as the 'internal outside of society'. This paradox will allow us to fully appreciate the genealogical meaning of risk, which will then appear as the dispositif that expresses and reinforces the paradox which is inherent to the nature of society
Bourgoin-Castonguay, Simon. "Entre histoire et vérité : Paul Ricœur et Michel Foucault : généalogie du sujet, herméneutique du soi et anthropologie". Doctoral thesis, Université Laval, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/25206.
Texto completo da fonteCette thèse cherche, par le biais des concepts d’histoire et de vérité, à placer en position de dialogue deux des plus grands philosophes français contemporains : Paul Ricœur et Michel Foucault. L’hypothèse avancée est que l’histoire du concept de subjectivité oscille entre la volonté de savoir et le désir de comprendre. Ces deux postures, irréductibles l’une à l’autre, inaugurent les deux méthodes à l’étude : une généalogie du sujet relevant d’une historicisation de la volonté de vérité (Foucault) et une herméneutique du soi érigée dans le besoin d’interpréter notre finitude (Ricœur). Alors que Ricœur élabore une anthropologie philosophique voulant prendre en charge la capacité interprétative de l’homme, Foucault développe pour sa part une critique de notre « âge anthropologique de la raison » (la modernité). Mais en dépit de cet écart apparent, tant l’herméneutique que la généalogie demeurent fondées dans une pensée de la finitude. Celle-ci motive une critique de la philosophie de l’histoire ainsi qu’une critique de son corollaire, la philosophie de la conscience : Foucault et Ricœur proposent ainsi deux images inversées d’une même problématisation historique du rapport à soi. Il s’agit en bref de poser la question de la subjectivité en évitant de la réduire à la « volonté de savoir » caractérisant les sciences humaines. La compréhension du rapport à soi passe avant tout par la reconnaissance, qui est ici tenue pour le fondement anthropologique de la subjectivation. Une analyse comparative des pratiques de véridiction (aveu, promesse, parrêsia) sert à cet effet de terrain commun sur le plan de l’éthique. Mais cette comparaison ne cherche pas la réconciliation. Il s’agit plutôt de relever, chaque fois, une tache aveugle rendant ces deux pensées complémentaires dans ce qui les oppose : faire jouer la distance, tel pourrait être le leitmotiv de cette recherche. Mots-clés : Michel Foucault ; Paul Ricœur ; histoire ; vérité ; herméneutique ; généalogie ; anthropologie philosophique ; épistémologie ; ontologie ; critique ; modernité ; structuralisme ; objectivation ; interprétation ; compréhension ; soi ; sujet ; subjectivité ; subjectivation ; pouvoir ; éthique ; reconnaissance ; capacité ; véridiction ; attestation ; aveu ; confession ; parrêsia ; promesse ; souci.
Through a philosophical analysis of the concepts of history and truth, this dissertation aims at creating a dialogue between the works of two of the most important contemporary French philosophers: Paul Ricœur and Michel Foucault. Our main hypothesis is that through its history, the concept of subjectivity fluctuates between the will to know and the desire of understanding. These two positions, irreducible to one another, reveal the two methods under study: a genealogy of the subject ensuing from a historicization of the will of truth (Foucault) and a hermeneutics of the self based on a universal need for interpreting our finitude (Ricœur). Whereas Ricœur develops a philosophical anthropology focusing on the interpretive capacity of man, Foucault, for his part, criticizes our ‘anthropological age of the reason’ (i.e. modernity). Despite this apparent gap, however, both hermeneutics and genealogy prove to be based on a philosophy of finitude. The latter motivates a critical analysis of both the philosophy of history and its corollary, the philosophy of consciousness: Foucault and Ricœur thus offer opposite views of a common historical problematizing of subjectivity. In short, the purpose of this work is to investigate the notion of subjectivity without restraining it to the will to know which characterizes the humanities. We argue that the comprehension of the self depends above all on acknowledgment, which is considered here to be the actual anthropological foundation of ‘subjectivation’. To this end, a comparative analysis of different ‘veridiction’ practices (confession, promise, parrhesia) acts as a common ground in terms of ethics. However, this comparison does not aim at reconciliation. The idea is rather to reveal a blind spot by which it becomes possible to grasp the complementary aspects of these thoughts through what actually separates them: therefore, this thesis could be considered as a playful use of the distance. Key-words : Michel Foucault ; Paul Ricœur ; history ; truth ; hermeneutics ; genealogy ; philosophical anthropology ; epistemology ; ontology ; critic ; modernity ; structuralism ; objectivation ; interpretation ; comprehension ; self ; subject ; subjectivity ; subjectivation ; power ; ethics ; acknowledgement ; capacity ; veridiction ; testimony ; confession ; parrhesia ; promise ; care.
Hortonéda, Jeanine. "Deux contemporains Michel Foucault et Gilles Deleuze : convergences, divergences, résurgences". Toulouse 2, 2009. http://www.theses.fr/2009TOU20115.
Texto completo da fonteFoucault and Deleuze: two philosophers, two contemporaries with an unusual career whose meeting and mutual acknoledgement throws a glimmering ligth on each other's thinking. By comparing Foucault's and Deleuze's texts, one can find out how concepts –even philosophical practices– pass and transform from one to the other. Their asymmetrical respective publications put into relief perspectives on topical questions theoretical and political common commitments, particulary on the issue of relationships between politics and subjectivization practices; How the subject came into being through desire, and how the body harnesses its pleasures –caught between subjection to and desubjection from – give rise to an array of questions about what a life that would be free from the concept of subject, êthopoiétique, alêthurgique, in a word, a philosophical life can be. Two philosophers concerned with the event – even though Deleuze's notion of transformation does not coincide with Foucault's genealogical and archeological approach – who share the same sharp sense of criticism in order to provide a new vision of thought and foster the resurgence of an ethical questioning after the “dead of man” and the “dead of God”
Pellegrini, Mariangela. "L'ontologie critique de nous-mêmes : Michel Foucault et la constitution du sujet dans une trame historique". Thesis, Paris 4, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PA040093.
Texto completo da fonteIn 1983 Foucault pronounces for the first time, during a lesson at the Collège de France, the syntagma “Critial Ontology of Ourselves”. Other similar denominations are used by Foucault in a retrospective way to define his philosophical researches, indeed throughout 1980 he uses at the same time: “Historical Ontology of ourselves”, “Ontology of the Actuality”, “Ontology of the present”, “Ontology of modernity”, et finally “Ontology of ourselves”. This list of synonyms concerns the principal aim of my dissertation: understand what is the Critical Ontology of Ourselves. The crucial point of this work consist from one hand in interrogating and understanding the syntagma above mentioned, from the other in verifying the possibility of the construction of a genesis of this idea
Cohen, Jessica. "Subjekt und Autonomie nach Michel Foucault : neue Entwicklungen der politischen Theorie in Frankreich". Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011IEPP0066.
Texto completo da fonteThis dissertation examines the development of the concept of subjectivity in the context of French criticism of poststructuralism by drawing on the work of three authors : Cornelius Castoriadis (1922-1997), Marcel Gauchet (born 1946) and Alain Renaut (born 1948). The research focuses on their critiques towards Michel Foucault (1926-1984) and explores their respective definitions of the notion of subject. The core question concerns the link between subject and autonomy : Why do all three authors reproach Foucault for giving up individual and political autonomy with his understanding of the subject, and do they open up new prospects for rethinking the subject as an autonomous political agent ? The different approaches put forward by Castoriadis, Gauchet and Renaut display that the French critique of poststructuralism is heterogeneous : Renaut advocates a return of reason and thus joins the work of Jürgen Habermas in Germany. Castoriadis, for his part, draws on French phenomenology by proposing to discover the human capacity of creation. Gauchet combines structuralist as well as phenomenological presuppositions. From a German perspective, a better knowledge of these phenomenologically inspired critiques of poststructuralism would be beneficial in order to open up further prospects for revising the concepts of subject and autonomy after Foucault
Tang, Mingjie. "Cogito, sujet, subjectivité chez Foucault". Thesis, Paris 1, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PA010543/document.
Texto completo da fonteThe foucauldian research on the question of the subject, the subject of knowledge and the subjectivity arise from his early studies of madness in the classical age, to the archeology of the human sciences in the classical period and modern, until his last research unfinished of the parrhesia from antiquity to Christianity. What Foucault discovered in the historical dispositions of the subject is not used to destroy the subjectivity, the will or the freedom individual, but to re-elaborate the traditional question of universal subject by placing it in the history of which the subject is not an alternative element of domination or obedience but a reciprocal element of operation. Thus the foucauldian problematizations of subject can be found in its relation to the truth as a veridiction relationship, in its relation to the power as a governmentality relationship (of self and of others), in its relation to oneself as a spiritual relationship. These three variables relationships for each period and for each individual establish a genealogy of the subject. In these multiple modalities of the subject, in this historical ontology of ourselves, we could find a kind of freedom, a place of the subject, the integrity of subjectivity which can only be applied individually and vigilant manner. That is to say, the only way by which we could get out of the subject's dilemma, by which we could refuse to be neither objective subject nor the subject object in the history or in the language, is to take its own individual relationships to the truth, to others and to oneself
Teillet, Arnaud. "Une fabrique du sujet contemporain : normes éducatives et dispositifs néolibéraux". Thesis, Paris 10, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019PA100155.
Texto completo da fonteThe neoliberal project, as developed theoretically in the inter-war years, and as applied politically from the late 1970s, identified as one of the conditions for its success and perpetuation the production of an original subject, capable of constantly adapting to new competitive economic and social configurations. In this context, education, insofar as it allows early action on subjectivations, is a major issue. New educational standards, espousing the economic logic of neoliberal rationality, have imposed, since the 1980s, reforms to school systems as well as reconfigurations to parental experiences. The common objective of all education becomes to transform the young individual, assimilated to an (economic) potential to be developed, into a productive, flexible, efficient and creative subject. Taken over by the self-help practices of a "culture of positivity" in constant expansion since the 1980s, and by the technological knowledge of neuroscience, contemporary childhoods have been disrupted. This work aims to report on the emergence of these new educational standards, and the childhoods they help to qualify and produce
Roberto-Alba, Nelson Fernando. "Politique et subjectivation. Michel Foucault, Félix Guattari, Jacques Rancière". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022PA080062.
Texto completo da fonteThis thesis deals with the question of modes of subjectivation and their relationship with politics in Michel Foucault, Félix Guattari and Jacques Rancière. It is embedded in the field of political and social philosophy of the second half of the 20th century in France around the question: how modes of collective subjectivation are constituted in politics and how these collective subjectivations are at the origin of forms of political practice and agency? The analysis of the modes of subjectivation imposes itself in a particular way on each of these philosophers by a questioning of politics, inseparable from a critique of the production processes of a subjugated, disciplined, normalized, placed and serialized individual. However, subjugation and objectification of the subject are only part of these new theoretical undertakings. They also relate to an exploration of creative forms of subjectification that remain irreducible to the subjugation in which they were produced, to the point of triggering new ways of conceiving and practicing politics itself. Despite the heterogeneity of these three social and political philosophies, we identify encounters, intersections and bifurcations, notably between Foucault and Guattari as well as between Foucault and Rancière, in specific files of journals from the seventies (Recherches, Les révoltes logiques) and experiences within militant movements (GIP, CERFI, CRIR) which constantly question the current forms of political organization, contestation and subjectivation. Politics presents itself for these philosophers at the margins of the analysis and the critical examination of several philosophical works which, relating the question of the subject to that of subjectification, not only end up questioning politics as political power, redistribution of sensitive or semiotic operator, but also as what remains outside mainstream (institutional) understanding of politics: neither management nor self- management of States, nor exercise of power, a matter of group decision-making or party strategies competing for a social representation, politics is related to the production of new forms of subjectivation and the recreation of meaning, of techniques and of practices that make it possible to establish unexpected relationships with the radical alterity of the world
Pingeot, Mazarine. "Temps et subjectivité chez Descartes : Identités et mémoire(s)". Thesis, Paris 8, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA080072/document.
Texto completo da fonteCoelho, de Souza Sandra. "L'éthique de Michel Foucault". Paris 10, 1995. http://www.theses.fr/1995PA100118.
Texto completo da fonteMy thesis shout Michel Foucault is mostly concerned by Foucault’s thought between "madness and civilization" (1960) and "history of sexuality" (1984). If one considers the thesis bibliography, it's possible to understand that Foucault’s work considered by me as more important of his thought is not always proposed by Foucault’s books; many articles and interviews elucidate the aims and trajectory of Foucault. This is the reason why they play an important role in the thesis. During one of his stays in Berkeley (October 1980), Foucault explain the themes of his ethics: "I am a moralist, insofar as a believe that one of the tasks, one of the meanings of human existence - the source of human freedom - is never to accept anything as definitiven untouchable, obvious or immobile" (history of the present, spring 1980). In this interview conducted by m. Bess, Foucault exposes the three elements of his moral thought. They are: "(1) the refusal to accept as self-evident the things that are proposed to us" - it concerns the first chapter of my thesis(l'experience fondamentale); "(2)the need to analyses and to know, since we can accomplishe nothing without reflexion and understanding thus the principle of curiosity" - it concerns la problematisation
Martins, Victor Mendonça Nobre. "L'Oedipe selon Foucault : Foucault lecteur et non-lecteur de Freud à travers le «complexe d’Oedipe»". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019USPCC069.
Texto completo da fonteFoucault's work, from the 1970s until his death in 1984, was marked by a critique of the "Oedipus complex", a concept essential to Freud. The radicalism of Foucault's critics would have implied, on the one hand, a certain distance from the psychoanalysts of his works and, on the other hand, that his readers take a certain distance from the Freudian letter. A fundamental detail to the understanding of this difficult interlocution: the references of the philosopher to the "Oedipus complex" were always formulated without presenting to his readers any quote from Freud. From within his own text, which systematically refers to the work of the psychoanalyst, Foucault summoned each time his interlocutor without ever giving him the floor. What reading of Freud would he have done? How could he write so much on the "Oedipus complex" without ever mentioning Freud? In order to identify the modalities, the aspects, the forms of this erased reading operation, we will approach the main Foucaldian references to the "Oedipus complex" and their negative logic
Colombo, Agustin. "Le bios de la brebis : la problématique de la subjectivité dans le christianisme chez Michel Foucault". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA080114.
Texto completo da fonteThis dissertation investigates the genealogical value that Michel Foucault assigns to Christianity focusing on the configuration of subjectivity, particularly on the way of life as a main domain in which subjectivity is constituted. More precisely, the dissertation is structured by following the three genealogical domains or constitutive areas of “focal points of experience” in Foucault’s last works. The first part tackles the problem of truth, in particular for what concerns the forms of veridiction; the second part focuses on the analysis of the forms of power, or more exactly, the techniques of governmentality; the last part approaches the forms of subjectivation or the practices of self. Based on available Foucauldian corpus and unpublished material –especially the Confessions of the Flesh (Les aveux de la chair) – the description and analysis of these three domains aim to answer two fundamental questions related to the Foucauldian diagnosis of the present: What is the historical role of Christianity in the configuration of the current forms of subjection? Are there any Christian phenomena according to which we could resist to those forms of subjection?
Pérez, Valérie. "(Se) gouverner selon la nature et la vérité : lire "Emile ou de l'éducation" de Jean-Jacques Rousseau avec Foucault et Deleuze". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PA080133.
Texto completo da fonteThis work is attempt to discuss Rousseau's problematisation of education, using concepts drawn from contem-porary French philosophy. However, if one examines the relation between Foucault and Emile by em-ploying the concept of alèthurgie, one cannot but be struck by the figure of the governor in Emile, who appears in the text to be the guarantor and the condition for the emergence of an idea of truth within the narrative- a truth which is natural, which governs the activities of men, and which is deeply in-volved in the process of education. In his 2012 lectures at the College de France, published under the title ‘The government of the living,’ Michel Fou-cault strove "to develop the concept of government by the truth" through an analysis of the power relations within Oedipus. In particular, Foucault ana-lysed the relation between truth, knowledge, and the exercise of governmen-tal power. In this work, I examine the relation between Foucault’s analysis and Emile Rousseau’s novel Emile. The relation between them may seem paradoxical: after all, Foucault is concerned with truth, and Emile is a work of fiction. The government of childhood can also be illuminated by the Deleuzian concept of Becoming. The Becoming does have something to tell us about childhood, the emancipation of the individual, and about education as a life-long project
Canavese, Mariana. "Les usages de Foucault en Argentine (1958-1989) : de l'homme nouveau à la fin du printemps démocratique". Paris, EHESS, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013EHES0030.
Texto completo da fonteMichel Foucault's work has been referenced by intellectuals of several disciplines and ideologies and has originated an intense and heterogeneous reception during the second half of the XX century in Argentina. This thesis offers the results of a research which central aim has been to explore and reconstruct the uses of Foucault's work by Argentina's intellectuals and social scientists. The research performed consisted in reviewing the ways those political- intellectual interventions have had impact in specific ways on the local culture and politics between 1958 and 1989. The research relied on critical reading of political-intellectual interventions and written documents, as well as files and secondary bibliography consulted. Sorne of the key participants of this movement were deeply interviewed to analyze the relationship between readers and readings. This research is placed in the field of intellectual history and, as case study, proposes a transdisciplinary approach which integrates tools and technique related to the intellectual and cultural history, the contemporary political theory and philosophy, and the cultural sociology. This work is based on the ideas' circulation and reception problems and the transcultural transfer
Baltus, Benoît. "Le philosophe artiste : La mise en surface de la philosophie : Panopticon, Amor fati, Etre au monde, L’Ethique". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 10, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA100054.
Texto completo da fonteThe philosopher artist is a either fantasized or disowned figure. Its very possibility represents the impossible border between philosophical discourse and artistic creation. Although Nietzsche invokes this polemical figure, he has not been able to establish the philosopher artist. Indeed he abandons it in favor of a reincarnated Dionysos, better armed to overcome the confrontation with Apollo. Here is, then, an orphan figure which seems to only refer to a romantic and idealistic nostalgia where philosophy, at last, would share its privileged objects as well as its analytical methods with artistic practice. The question should nonetheless be asked: through what means ought the philosopher artist carry together art and philosophy?This thesis attempts to reintroduce this “eternal” problem by investigating every step of the way the typical tensions that this figure convokes: form and content; metaphysics and phenomena; language and metaphor. Similarly, although Nietzsche is the central figure of this investigation, we will also call upon other and equally typical philosophers such as Merleau-Ponty, Deleuze, as well as Spinoza and Aristotle. However, the aim of the thesis is not to grasp once again these properly philosophical problems as their utterance should be tested through artistic practice. Rather than uselessly attempt to elect a figure without master nor limit, the thesis thus contemplates, each time, a solution through artistic creation, manifested in original choreographic creations. These creations were produced in parallel with the research and elaborate singular works of art based on the same questions as the thesis. They confer to the dissertation a certain plasticity that the purely philosophical argument may have lacked. Further, they abolish the border inasmuch as they confront the same constraints as the argument: Panopticon interrogates panoptism as studied by Foucault in Discipline and Punish; Amor Fati elaborates on the concept of “eternal return” developed by Nietzsche; Etre au Monde recasts the question of sensibility as explored by Merleau-Ponty; finally, L’Ethique strives to reinvest from a sensible point of view the architecture of the axiomatic work of Spinoza. Is it not the meaning of the philosopher artist? Experiment and feel to study the effects?
Delvaux, Amaury. "Défaire le sens de l'histoire : Archéologie et Déconstruction". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université de Lille (2018-2021), 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020LILUH042.
Texto completo da fonteThis thesis is about the famous debate between Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida. The aim is to propose a new vision of the relation between their respective thoughts during the 1960s. More precisely, our analysis tries to build a discussion between Foucault and Derrida by focusing on the problem of (the) History in their own works. Actually, the real subject of their debate is less the function of madness in the Cartesian discourse than the essence of history. Through the works of Foucault and Derrida published during the 1960s, an implicit but persistent discussion between the two authors about the problem of history can be built. Firstly, our text attempts to establish the conception of history mobilised by Derrida in his reading of Foucault’s book Madness and Civilization. Furthermore, it underlines the way The Order of Things suggests a solid response to the Derridean interpretation of Descartes’s first meditation and reveals its anachronistic aspect. Secondly, it addresses the fashion which Foucault wishes to distance himself from for the continuous history sustained by the Hegelian and Husserlian tradition. In order to do this, it was absolutely necessary to understand correctly the discourse’s analyses that underpin the discontinuous history. Thirdly, our text highlights how Derrida dismantles the core of the continuous history which he mobilises against the Foucauldian archaeology. In the conclusion, our text suggests that archaeological history could have been the “concept” of history that the Derridean deconstruction has been searching after 1967
Sanna, Maria Eleonora. "Pratiques de Soi et Performance de Genre : la construction des sujets politiques entre Pouvoir et Autonomie. Une lecture croisée de Michel Foucault et Judith Butler". Phd thesis, Université Paris VIII Vincennes-Saint Denis, 2006. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00358609.
Texto completo da fonteColrat, Paul. "Le mythe du philosophe-roi : savoir, pouvoir et salut dans la philosophie politique de Platonε". Thesis, Normandie, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019NORMC005.
Texto completo da fonteThe question of the philosophers’ reign can only be understood at the cost of a detour through the margins of classical politics. First of all, I have shown that these margins have historically been defined by a discourse focusing on the relationship between kingdom, knowledge and salvation (chapter 1). I have then shown that the notion of kingdom itself, when it is attributed to philosophers, positions itself in the margins of the notion of basilein, while actively subverting its classical meaning (chapter 2). The discourse about the philosophers’ reign must therefore be understood as an attempt coming from the margins of politics to use the traditional relation between the muthos and political unification, in order to subvert it, namely, to depose it. This required me to explore the way in which the philosopher can simultaneously be in the margins of politics and at the very foundation of politics (chapter 4). The philosopher’s position in the city is doubly marginal: first, he is not subject to the imperative to be useful to the city (chapter 5), and secondly, he is not subject to the imperative to ground knowledge in experience (chapter 6). Finally, I have set out to show that the philosophers’ reign inscribes itself within a quest for the city’s salvation, a theme that is itself marginal in Plato studies, and deserves more attention than it has hitherto received (chapter 7)
Baltus, Benoît. "Le philosophe artiste : La mise en surface de la philosophie : Panopticon, Amor fati, Etre au monde, L’Ethique". Thesis, Paris 10, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA100054.
Texto completo da fonteThe philosopher artist is a either fantasized or disowned figure. Its very possibility represents the impossible border between philosophical discourse and artistic creation. Although Nietzsche invokes this polemical figure, he has not been able to establish the philosopher artist. Indeed he abandons it in favor of a reincarnated Dionysos, better armed to overcome the confrontation with Apollo. Here is, then, an orphan figure which seems to only refer to a romantic and idealistic nostalgia where philosophy, at last, would share its privileged objects as well as its analytical methods with artistic practice. The question should nonetheless be asked: through what means ought the philosopher artist carry together art and philosophy?This thesis attempts to reintroduce this “eternal” problem by investigating every step of the way the typical tensions that this figure convokes: form and content; metaphysics and phenomena; language and metaphor. Similarly, although Nietzsche is the central figure of this investigation, we will also call upon other and equally typical philosophers such as Merleau-Ponty, Deleuze, as well as Spinoza and Aristotle. However, the aim of the thesis is not to grasp once again these properly philosophical problems as their utterance should be tested through artistic practice. Rather than uselessly attempt to elect a figure without master nor limit, the thesis thus contemplates, each time, a solution through artistic creation, manifested in original choreographic creations. These creations were produced in parallel with the research and elaborate singular works of art based on the same questions as the thesis. They confer to the dissertation a certain plasticity that the purely philosophical argument may have lacked. Further, they abolish the border inasmuch as they confront the same constraints as the argument: Panopticon interrogates panoptism as studied by Foucault in Discipline and Punish; Amor Fati elaborates on the concept of “eternal return” developed by Nietzsche; Etre au Monde recasts the question of sensibility as explored by Merleau-Ponty; finally, L’Ethique strives to reinvest from a sensible point of view the architecture of the axiomatic work of Spinoza. Is it not the meaning of the philosopher artist? Experiment and feel to study the effects?
Doron, Claude-Olivier. "Races et dégénérescence : l'émergence des savoirs sur l'homme anormal". Phd thesis, Paris 7, 2011. https://theses.hal.science/tel-00876157.
Texto completo da fonteThis Ph-D thesis develops the twofold history of the notions of "race" and "degeneration" between the XVIIth and the XIXth century. This history is studied from two points of view: historical epistemology that is "how race and degeneration became the concepts of various knowledges (natural history, anthropology, psychiatry)"; and history of government practices, that is "how race and degeneration became problems government". Focusing on the historical link between these notions gives us the possibility to analyze the emergence, in the XIXth century, of a field of knowledge that dealt with what we call the "abnormal mar that is this very specific entity which agglomerates madness, criminality and "inferior" races as deviations human normality, in an ambiguous space between the normal and the pathological. Our thesis describes the various categories that organise this field of knowledge. More deeply, we want to argue that the notions race and degeneration, far from being external to humanism and universalism, far from being systematical correlated to practices of exclusion, are intimately connected to a practical and theoretical humanism and practices of inclusion, that deal with race, madness and crime as alterations of a norm one has to regenerate correct and improve through specific apparatus of power. Through this historical lens, we want to study ; the ambiguities and aporias that lurk in the very heart of this will of inclusion and this analysis heterogeneous realities as alterations of a norm. We show in particular how we can establish a very stronglink between the insertion of the concept of "race" into natural history and monogenism; and, on the other side, how it is important to study the insertion of "race" into the political field and, more broadly, the emergence of the knowledge of the abnormal, to take into consideration its logical links with political liberalism in the beginning of XIXth century