Bibliografias temáticas / Collectivization of agriculture – ukraine – history

Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Collectivization of agriculture – ukraine – history"

Autor: Grafiati
Publicado: 27 de julho de 2024
Última modificação: 28 de julho de 2024

Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos

Selecione um tipo de fonte:

Índice

Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Collectivization of agriculture – ukraine – history".

Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.

Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Collectivization of agriculture – ukraine – history"

1

Kurylchuk, Natalia. "COLLECTIVIZATION OF ZHYTOMYR REGION AGRICULTURE (A STUDY OF GOLISHI AND MAIDAN VILLAGES OF OLEVSK DISTRICT)". Kyiv Historical Studies, n.º 1 (2019): 51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.28925/2524-0757.2019.1.7.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
At the current stage of historical heritage realization the problems of political and economic transformations in Zhytomyr region during the late 1920s mid–1930s require systematic review. The significance of the study is determined by the scope of numerous problems as well as immensely vast study material available. Hundreds of thousands of cases in state repositories and archives are still not introduced into scientific circulation due to the lack of national, regional and local research directions. That is why a detailed analysis of implementation methods and collectivization consequences in Olevsk district villages is of major importance for a comprehensive study of the region history and the country as a whole. To conduct our investigation we have used general scientific and special historical methods such as comparative-historical and critical, generalization and systematization, problem-chronological, biographical, archive heuristics, statistical and analytical methods, and others. The study presents the documentary material from the State Archives of Zhytomyr region and Sectoral State Archive of the Security Service of Ukraine. The article provides the analysis of some archival criminal investigations and focuses on the fates of some Olevsky district residents. Information capabilities of the specified number of documents for the study of collectivization, political repressions against the richest rural representatives and those who tried to resist the existing regime are highlighted.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
2

Tsyganenko, Lilia. "Трансформация этни­ческого состава населения украинского Подунавья: к вопросу о переселении молдаван/румын на Дальний Восток (1947-1949 гг.) / Transformation of the Ethnic Combination of the Ukrainian Podunavia Population: on the Issue of the Resettlement of Moldavians/Romanian to the Far East (1947 – 1949)". Supplement 9, n.º 1 (24 de julho de 2021): 84–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.37710/plural.v9i1s_6.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Based on previously unpublished archive documents (Ismail, Ukraine), the organization and resettlement of parts of the residents from the lower Danube region to South Sakhalin in 1947-1949 are considered. First of all, the resettlement touched the representatives of the Moldovan/Romanian ethnic group living in Reni district. This relocation should be seen as an attempt from the part of the Soviet totalitarian regime to transform the ethnic composition of the region, having evicted the part of the local population to remote corners of the Soviet empire, which, without much enthusiasm, met the socialist changes of the second half of the 1940s and related to the collectivization of agriculture. The age, gender, and quantitative indicators are analyzed. Lists of immigrants to the South Sakhalin in 1947 and 1948 are given.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
3

Margolin, Victor. "Stalin and Wheat: Collective Farms and Composite Portraits". Gastronomica 3, n.º 2 (2003): 14–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2003.3.2.14.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
In late 1939, USSR in Construction, the Soviet propaganda magazine, published a special issue on the Stalin Collective Farm in the Ukraine. The inside front cover of the magazine contained an anonymous paean to socialist farming, attributing its success to the foresight and support of Joseph Stalin, the nation's leader. On the page flanking the euphoric opening text was a near full-page portrait of Comrade Stalin composed of multi-hued grains including millet, alfalfa, and poppy. Grain, or the absence thereof, was fundamental to the development of collective farms in the Soviet Union. By early 1929, government pressure to form large state-run farms had increased and Stalin declared war on the kulaks, or rich peasants. The kulaks responded by killing their livestock, destroying their crops, and demolishing their homesteads. Nonetheless, collectivization, backed by the Party apparatus, continued relentlessly. Needless to say, none of the resistance to collectivized agriculture was evident in USSR in Construction's depiction of life on the Stalin Collective Farm. At the end of the issue, the apparent happiness and prosperity of the workers were attributed to the virtues of socialism. In the later 1930s, with the inauguration of Stalin's "cult of personality," the nation was consistently equated with Stalin himself, hence the choice of his profile for the composite grain portrait. The seamlessness with which a multitude of grains could become a composite portrait of the nation's leader shows how successfully the Soviet government was able to rewrite the history of agricultural collectivization. The pain, loss, and resistance of the small landowners was successfully obliterated and replaced by a new narrative in which collective farm workers prospered and found happiness within a political system that was now synonymous with the beneficence of a single individual, Joseph Stalin.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
4

Kravchuk, Leonid Vasylovych, Taras Bohdanovych Kadobnyi e L. О. Kravchuk. "Formation of democratic values and competence among medical students at the ambushes of the interdisciplinary integration (Sovietization history of Ternopil region in the 1940s)". Engineering and Educational Technologies 8, n.º 4 (30 de dezembro de 2020): 26–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.30929/2307-9770.2020.08.04.03.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
The article reveals the inhumane nature of the communist system, the inefficiency of command-and-control Soviet methods of managing agriculture and industry. The activity of the Soviet power is analyzed, which from September 1939-1941 began to implement force management methods. This issue is especially relevant today, when Ukrainian society solves a set of political, economic and socio-cultural problems generated in the previous historical period by authoritarian forcible replacement of a democratic socialist state, market economy - administrative-planned, universal values - values of communist ideology. In the main part of the article the author, using the achievements of domestic and foreign historical science, the source base of national and foreign archives, applying the theoretical and methodological experience of the past and innovations of the present, managed to expand unbiased, comprehensive, multi-vector and diverse study of socio-political and socio-economic western Ukrainian lands at the initial stage of forceful accession to the USSR as part of the USSR. Modern analysis and coverage of socio-political and socio-economic transformations in Ternopil region in September 1939-1941 contributes to the establishment of narrative, de-Sovietization of consciousness of certain segments of modern society and awareness of the aggressive nature of totalitarianism. Secondly, the Sovietization of Ternopil took place simultaneously with the liquidation of Poland by destroying democratic European values, with the rigid imposition of Stalin's party-state policy aimed at establishing an authoritarian administrative-command system of government in the western Ukrainian region. The main features of Sovietization, the author identifies, are: the use of military force at the initial stage of its implementation; formation of administrative-command management system; authoritarian interference of party bodies in all spheres of life in the region; nationalization of industry and collectivization of agriculture, etc. State-owned enterprises, as well as enterprises of the socialized municipal economy, were formed on the basis of nationalized industrial, financial, trade and communal facilities. The practical significance of the results of LV Kravchuk's research is that its main provisions, theoretical generalizations and conclusions can be used in the process of further, more detailed study of such individual industries as industry, agriculture in the field of local lore and in preparing special courses in History. Ukraine of the twentieth century. The struggle against the communist system continued in the 1970s and 1980s, and the creation of the Ukrainian People's Movement and other political and public organizations accelerated the collapse of the Soviet empire in 1991. Therefore, in the proposed articles, the main scientific provisions are professionally justified, are of considerable scientific interest. The factual material is systematized and consistently presented, the conclusions are clear and understandable.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
5

Bestanchuk, Yana. "Historiography of relations between the soviet government and the local population in the territory of Northern Bukovyna and Khotyn region in 1940-1947". History Journal of Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, n.º 57 (30 de junho de 2023): 121–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.31861/hj2023.57.121-129.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the historiography of the topic of relations between Soviet authorities and local population, the instruction of Sovietization processes in the territory of Northern Bukovyna and Khotyn region during 1940-1947.The study of relationship between Soviet authorities and local population is quite unexplored and requires further scientific study. There was no comprehensive study. In the scientific literature, this issue is highlighted in the form of a diverse thematic spectrum and concerns current political, economic, household and educational and cultural issues. During the last decades, depending on socio-political conditions and the available base of historical sources, the approach to the coverage of the mentioned issues has changed.The conclusion emphasizes that modern Ukrainian historiography, relying on a much wider source base, examines in more depth certain aspects the life of population in the territory of Chernivtsi region.Soviet historiography in Ukraine was strongly influenced by communist ideology and censorship, which had a significant impact on the study of the history of Bukovyna. The problems and achievements of Soviet industrial construction, the collectivization of agriculture, and the development of industry and transport infrastructure were studied. Special attention was paid to Soviet land reform policies and national policy regarding Bukovyna national minorities.Researchers are forced to work within the approved historical concept and maintain a positive image of Soviet government. This approach significantly limited the possibility of conducting objective research and analysis of the history of Bukovyna in the specified period.Foreign historiography of the history of Bukovyna was aimed at a detailed study of the events and processes of that time, in particular in the context of national issues using available sources and archival materials.Ukrainian historiography of the history of Bukovyna sought to understand and analyze the complex events of that time, focusing on the political, socio-economic and cultural aspects of life in Bukovyna, as well as on the role of Ukrainian population in the struggle for freedom and national independence.Thus, during the half-century period of studying the problems of the entry of Northern Bukovyna territory into the USSR, the interaction of local population and the Soviet authorities, the literature is not sufficiently systematized and does not cover the problems as a whole, a lot of works have a limited source base, because access to information on this topic was provided only at the end of the 20th century.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
6

Suprun, Natalia. "Economic reasons and consequences of the Holodomor in Ukraine (to the 90th anniversary of the Holodomor in Ukraine and the 95th anniversary of Vsevolod Golubnychy)". Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni 2023, n.º 56 (4 de dezembro de 2023): 225–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2023.56.225.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
The article is devoted to the analysis of the economic causes and consequences of the Holodomor organized in Ukraine by the Soviet authorities in 1932–1933. The study was conducted on the basis of the conceptual approach of one of the first researchers of the Holodomor, Vsevolod Golubnychy (1928–1977). It is substantiated that the main cause of the famine in Ukraine in 1932–1933 was the Soviet economic policy, which was aimed at the total monopolization of economic power, one of the mechanisms of which was collectivization. Having become part of a total state monopoly and the object of merciless exploitation by economic and non-economic methods, agriculture ceased to fulfill its main function – providing the population with food and saturating the commodity market. This caused a deformation of the market structure and an imbalance in the ratio of product demand and supply. Taking into account the fact that the main tool of collectivization was disinvestment, i.e. the liquidation (including physical) of the most efficient agricultural producers, it was concluded that the priority of Soviet policy was not the creation of an effective system of farming in the countryside, but the overcoming of public opposition the most an organized and independent stratum of agrarians, with the subordination of the rest of the Ukrainian peasantry to Bolshevik rule. The ineffective policy of collectivization caused a drop in productivity and led to a large-scale Holodomor, the negative economic consequence of the Holodomor was the physical destruction of a huge part of the able-bodied and hard-working population. Collectivization and the Holodomor, which was caused by it, caused irreparable damage to the agriculture of Ukraine, effectively destroying the effective traditional system of management, led to a decrease in the efficiency of the Ukrainian agricultural economy, and in the long run became one of the leading factors in the decline of the Soviet economic system.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
7

McDonald, Tracy. "Peasants Under Siege: The Collectivization of Romanian Agriculture,1949–1962". Social History 38, n.º 1 (fevereiro de 2013): 112–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03071022.2013.758798.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
8

Muzrobjon, Abdullayev. "FROM THE HISTORY OF THE ORGANIZATION OF THE LABOR ACTIVITY OF "KULAK" FAMILIES EXILE IN UZBEKISTAN". International Journal Of History And Political Sciences 3, n.º 12 (1 de dezembro de 2023): 76–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/ijhps/volume03issue12-13.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
The article analyzes the issues of organization of "kulak" farms exiled to remote areas of the republic and organization of labor activities in agriculture in the process of total collectivization of agriculture in Uzbekistan. In 1930-1931, information on the dislocation of 17 "ear settlements" established in the Uzbek SSR and the number of families, people, and labor activities of the deportees in them is summarized.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
9

Raymond, Chad. ""No Responsibility and No Rice": The Rise and Fall of Agricultural Collectivization in Vietnam". Agricultural History 82, n.º 1 (1 de janeiro de 2008): 43–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00021482-82.1.43.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Abstract Communist leaders in Vietnam attempted to use agricultural collectivization to transform a poor, agrarian country into a modern, socialist nation with an industrialized economy. Collectivized agricultural production lacked sufficient economic incentives for Vietnamese farmers; they preferred to produce privately for household consumption or the free market. State-initiated reforms to collectivize agriculture failed to improve the performance of the agricultural sector, and eventually the Vietnamese Communist Party was forced to abandon collectivization altogether. Once farmers were freed from collective labor and could pursue private production for the free market, Vietnam’s agricultural output skyrocketed.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
10

Мордовченков, Н. В., В. М. Поляков e Г. А. Тихомиров. "«Sovietization» of the USSR and GDR agriculture: pluralism of economic assessments". Экономика и предпринимательство, n.º 2(115) (6 de maio de 2020): 594–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.34925/eip.2020.115.2.118.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Статья посвящена анализу проблем развития и экономических оценок сельского хозяйства в Российской империи, СССР и Российской Федерации, а также в ГДР. Рассматривается развитие сельского хозяйства в рамках аграрной реформы Столыпина, политики военного коммунизма, новой экономической политики. Особое внимание авторы уделяют анализу коллективизации сельского хозяйства в СССР и в ГДР («советизации» сельского хозяйства). Проводится сравнительный анализ точек зрения отечественных и зарубежных, в частности, немецких историков и экономистоваграриев на историю коллективизации сельского хозяйства. The article is devoted to the analysis of development problems and economic assessments of agriculture in the Russian Empire, the USSR and the Russian Federation, as well as in the GDR. The development of agriculture is considered in the framework of the Stolypin agrarian reform, the policy of war communism, and the new economic policy. The authors pay special attention to the analysis of the collectivization of agriculture in the USSR and in the GDR ("Sovietization" of agriculture). A comparative analysis of the points of view of domestic and foreign, in particular, German historians and economists, agrarians on the history of collectivization of agriculture.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
Mais fontes

Teses / dissertações sobre o assunto "Collectivization of agriculture – ukraine – history"

1

Marples, David Roger. "Colectivization of agriculture in Western Ukraine 1944-1951". Thesis, University of Sheffield, 1985. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.385736.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
2

Dooley, Kathryn Amelia 1984. "Stalinist Policies, Indigenous Agents, and Peasant Actors: Negotiating Collectivization in Uzbekistan, 1929-1932". Thesis, University of Oregon, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/9868.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
viii, 97 p. : ill. A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number.
Peasant experiences of agricultural collectivization in Uzbekistan followed an overarching pattern familiar from studies of collectivization elsewhere in the USSR but simultaneously bore the deep imprint of Central Asia's unique history of Soviet rule since the revolution. State control remained weak in the Uzbek village, and Uzbek officials at the local level were forced to mediate between pressure from the central authorities and pressure from traditional village norms. As a result, the contours of collectivization in Uzbekistan were defined as much by local specificities and face-to-face relationships as by central policy. Uzbek peasants initially engaged in mass resistance to collectivization, drawing on a tradition of comprehensive opposition to Soviet rule on grounds of culture, Islam, nation, and village solidarity. But despite their apparent intransigence, over time Uzbek peasants found broad opportunities for compromise and collaboration with the state within the malleable framework of power and affiliation in Stalin-era Central Asia.
Committee in Charge: Julie Hessler, Chair; Alan Kimball; Jenifer Presto
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
3

Kuns, Brian. "Peasants and Stock Markets : Pathways from Collective Farming in the Post-Soviet Grain-Belt". Doctoral thesis, Stockholms universitet, Kulturgeografiska institutionen, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-146509.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
What happened in the post-Soviet, European grain-belt after collective farms were dissolved and in what way can we say that collective farm legacies influence agrarian developments in this region today? These are the main questions of this thesis, which is a work of critical human geography, but is also inspired by theories, methods and approaches from the social sciences, broadly defined. Territorially, the focus is Ukraine, but several articles in this thesis take a wider geographic perspective beyond Ukraine, in particular taking into account the role of Nordic investors in the agrarian sector in Ukraine and Russia. The main aim of this thesis is to examine how farms of different sizes – from small peasant farms to super large corporate farms – develop and change in post-communist circumstances. Another purpose is to reinterpret Soviet agrarian history, in light of what happened after the collapse of communism, in order to incorporate the Soviet experience in a global historical narrative, and to better understand the legacy of collective farming today. These issues are explored in four papers and a comprehensive summary. The first article examines small-scale, household “peasant” agriculture in southern Ukraine and shows the conditions and factors, which have contributed to an impressive intensification of farming in certain villages. The second article investigates large-scale, Nordic investments in Ukrainian and Russian agriculture, with the aim of explaining why many (but not all) such investments have not succeeded to the degree that investors hoped. The third paper focuses on the legacy and afterlife of Soviet-era investments in large-scale irrigation in southern Ukraine, and uses the post-Soviet reincarnation of irrigation in this region to problematize traditional narratives on Soviet environmental management in a global context. The fourth paper, with a wider historical lens, explains the link between collective farms and today’s agroholding agriculture in much of the region, while also discussing the sustainability crisis in agriculture both in a Soviet and post-Soviet context, concluding with a description of a possible and ironic (but by no means inevitable) scenario whereby post-Soviet agriculture saves global capitalism.  Theoretically, this thesis is informed by agrarian political economy; related, contemporary debates on the financialization of agriculture; and critical human geography discussions on uneven development and the geographies of difference. This thesis also is inspired by Actor Network Theory, and the view that reality is constituted by hybrid subject-objects, which are instantiated through the agency of an assemblage or network of different actors, material things, discourses, institutions, etc... While such Actor Network approaches are certainly not new, their application to Soviet and post-Soviet change is relatively new. The source material, which is the basis for the empirical approach of this thesis, is eclectic, and produced via mixed methods from different locations. Analysis is based on interviews (75 interviews in southern Ukraine, in Kyiv, and in Stockholm, plus 28 visits to household farms in one study village in southern Ukraine); participant observation (carried out in the study village in southern Ukraine and in corporate shareholder meetings mostly in Stockholm); various texts, such as corporate documents and newspaper commentary; agricultural statistics; and satellite data.  Among other conclusions, this thesis argues that, given certain factors, small-scale, household agriculture can be viable, at the same time that the concentration and consolidation of agriculture into large-scale holdings is likely to continue, at least in the short term. This thesis also highlights similarities between Soviet and capitalist agriculture in a global historical context, which is one reason that the transformation from Soviet to capitalist agriculture could occur so fast in some areas.

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 3: Manuscript. Paper 4: Manuscript.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
4

TOKARSKI, Slawomir. "Ethnic conflict and economic development : Jews in Galician agriculture 1868-1914". Doctoral thesis, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/6001.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Defence date: 2 May 1995
Examining board: Prof. Richard Griffiths, European University Institute (supervisor) ; Prof. Victor Karady, Centre De Sociologie De L'Éducation et de la Culture ; Prof. Rene Leboutte, European University Institute ; Prof. Michael Müller, European University Institute (co-supervisor) ; Prof. Jerzy Topolski, University of Poznań
First made available online: 2 September 2016
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
5

KESSLER, Gijs. "The peasant and the town : rural-urban migration in the Soviet Union, 1929-1940". Doctoral thesis, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/5855.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Defence date: 14 December 2001
Examining board: Prof. Andrea Graziosi, Università Federico II, Napoli ; Prof. Terry Martin, Harvard University ; Prof. Arfon Rees, EUI ; Prof. Jaime Reis, University of Lisbon (supervisor)
PDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digitised archive of EUI PhD theses completed between 2013 and 2017
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Livros sobre o assunto "Collectivization of agriculture – ukraine – history"

1

V, Rudenko, e Ukraïnsʹke pravoslavne bratstvo sv. Volodymyra v Toronti., eds. The Great famine in Ukraine, 1932-33: A collection of memoirs, speeches, and essays prepared in 1983 in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the famine in Ukraine during 1932-33. Toronto: The Ukrainian Orthodox Brotherhood of St. Volodymyr, 1988.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
2

T︠S︡entralʹnyĭ derz︠h︡avnyĭ arkhiv hromadsʹkykh ob'i︠e︡dnanʹ Ukraïny. Holodomor, famine in Ukraine, 1932-1933: From the Central State Archive of Public Organizations Kiev. Woodbridge, CT: Primary Source Microfilm, an imprint of the Gale Group, 2004.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
3

Michał, Łesiów, ed. Głód na Ukrainie. Lublin: Wyd-wo Werset, 2005.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
4

Y, Luciuk Lubomyr, e Grekul Lisa 1972-, eds. Holodomor: Reflections on the Great Famine of 1932-1933 in Soviet Ukraine. Kingston, Ont: Kashtan Press, 2008.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
5

Diana, Bojko, Bednarek Jerzy, Poland. Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji., Instytut Pamięci Narodowej--Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu., Instytut politychnykh i etnonat︠s︡ionalʹnykh doslidz︠h︡enʹ NAN Ukraïny. e Sluz︠h︡ba bezpeky Ukraïny. Derz︠h︡avnyĭ arkhiv., eds. Holodomor: The Great Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933. Warsaw: Institute of National Remembrance, Commission of the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation, 2009.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
6

Diana, Bojko, Bednarek Jerzy, Poland. Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji., Instytut Pamięci Narodowej--Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu., Instytut politychnykh i etnonat︠s︡ionalʹnykh doslidz︠h︡enʹ NAN Ukraïny. e Sluz︠h︡ba bezpeky Ukraïny. Derz︠h︡avnyĭ arkhiv., eds. Wielki Głód na Ukrainie, 1932-1933. Warszawa: Instytut Pamięci Narodowej--Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu, 2008.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
7

Diana, Bojko, Bednarek Jerzy, Poland. Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji., Instytut Pamięci Narodowej--Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu., Instytut politychnykh i etnonat︠s︡ionalʹnykh doslidz︠h︡enʹ NAN Ukraïny. e Sluz︠h︡ba bezpeky Ukraïny. Derz︠h︡avnyĭ arkhiv., eds. Wielki Głód na Ukrainie, 1932-1933. Warszawa: Instytut Pamięci Narodowej--Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu, 2008.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
8

Applebaum, Anne. Red Famine: Stalin's War on Ukraine, 1921-1933. London, UK: Penguin Books, 2018.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
9

Vasylʹev, Valeriĭ. Kollektivizat͡s︡ii͡a︡ i krestʹi͡a︡nskoe soprotivlenie na Ukraine: Noi͡a︡brʹ 1929-mart 1930 g.g. Vinnyt͡s︡i͡a︡: "Lohos", 1997.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
10

International Commission of Inquiry into the 1932-33 Famine in Ukraine. International Commission of Inquiry into the 1932-33 Famine in Ukraine: May 23-27, 1988 Europa Hotel Brussels, Belgium : [proceedings]. [Toronto?: The Commission, 1988.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
Mais fontes

Capítulos de livros sobre o assunto "Collectivization of agriculture – ukraine – history"

1

Bauerkämper, Arnd. "The collectivization of agriculture in Southeastern Europe". In The Routledge Handbook of Balkan and Southeast European History, 431–38. First edition. | New York: Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429464799-57.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
2

Daly, Jonathan. "Frontier Agriculture and the Creation of Global Neo-Europes". In The Oxford Handbook of Agricultural History, 552–69. Oxford University Press, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190924164.013.29.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Abstract In the late nineteenth century, five countries topped the list of global wheat exporters: Russia, the United States, Canada, Argentina, and Australia. All five benefited from ongoing technological innovations but could not have become breadbaskets of the world without some of the richest grassland on the planet. Their global output was spurred in large part by the booming industrial economy requiring vastly more grain for burgeoning urban labor forces. Although the Soviet collectivization drive derailed the Russian agricultural colossus, it was back on track and had reached the number one position in world wheat exports by 2018. The other four early breadbaskets remained in the top six, suggesting something like an environmental determinism at work.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
3

Luka, Dániel. "Agricultural Decisions and Disagreements in Stalinist Hungary, 1948–1953". In New Investigations into the Economic and Social History of Hungary from the 18th to 21st Century, 144–62. Working Group of Economic and Social History Regional Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Pécs, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.15170/seshst-04-09.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
The purpose of the study. The aim of this study is to explore the inner repression in the state and party apparatus regarding rural affairs, the emerging dissent among the cadres and the conflicts of Stalinist style collectivization related to agricultural decision-making and its implementation. The main research period is the height of party state terror when the symptoms of malfunction of planned economy surfaced more intensively between 1951 and mid-1953. Applied methods. Qualitative analysis was conducted on archival sources, which consists of party organs’ resolutions and documents as well as of reports, minutes and records of the Ministry of Agriculture in particular. Outcomes. The party leadership’s reaction to the challenges and crisis was constant purge, but even persecution of the “enemies” of the state had to be limited. The study highlights that the agricultural apparatus did not implement unreasonable plans without any resistance from 1948 up until mid-1953. It does mean that the communist agricultural policy cannot be seen as a straight line. On the one hand, the failing collectivization drive forced the top brass to reconsider policy; on the other hand, the growing dissatisfaction and disagreement could play a significant role in the process.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
4

Vergunov, V. A. "HISTORY OF AGRICULTURE IN UKRAINE DURING THE INTEGRATION OF STATE REGULATION SYSTEMS". In RELEVANT RESEARCH OF HISTORICAL SCIENCES, 220–39. Liha-Pres, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-100-1/220-239.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Trabalhos de conferências sobre o assunto "Collectivization of agriculture – ukraine – history"

1

Motuz, Valeria. "FEMALE ASPECT OF THE HISTORY OF THE PEASANT MOVEMENT IN UKRAINE OF THE PERIOD OF MASSIVE COLLECTIVIZATION (LATE 20S – BEGINNING 30S)". In SPECIALIZED AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES. European Scientific Platform, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36074/11.12.2020.v5.42.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
2

Kosolapov, Vladimir, Ilya Trofimov, Lyudmila Trofimova e Elena Yakovleva. "100 years of the State Meadow Institute". In Multifunctional adaptive fodder production. ru: Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.33814/mak-2022-28-76-9-18.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
100 years since the Establishment of the State Meadow Institute the Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production & Agroecology celebrates in June 2022. The State Meadow Institute creation was event of the most important state significance. This event is extremely important for rational nature management, increasing soil fertility, obtaining high and sustainable crop yields, and preserving the productive longevity of our lands. In 1922 the Station for the study of forage plants and forage area was transformed into the State Meadow Institute (SMI). 1930 – SMI was transformed into the All-Union Williams Fodder Research Institute. 1992 – transformation into the All-Russian Williams Fodder Research Institute. 2018 transformation into the Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production & Agroecology. Throughout its history, the Institute has proudly borne the name of its founder – W. R. Williams. Such famous scientists as V. R. Williams, A. M. Dmitriev, L. G. Ramensky, I. V. Larin, S. P. Smelov, T. A. Rabotnov, A. A. Zubrilin and many others worked at the Institute. The Institute's works (books, articles) have been published in England, Belarus, Bulgaria, China, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Kazakhstan, Korea, Mongolia, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, USA, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, Switzerland, Sweden, and Japan. Scientific and practical achievements of the Institute were awarded 7 times with State prizes of the USSR and the Russian Federation in the field of science and technology, as well as Prizes of the government of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of agriculture of the Russian Federation, diplomas of Exhibitions and other awards. For services to the country, the Institute was awarded the order of Labor Red Banner.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
Você também pode estar interessado nas extensas listas de trabalhos sobre o assunto "Collectivization of agriculture – ukraine – history":
Artigos de revistas Livros
Oferecemos descontos em todos os planos premium para autores cujas obras estão incluídas em seleções literárias temáticas. Contate-nos para obter um código promocional único!

Vá para a bibliografia