Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Berlin Russian War memorial"
Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos
Índice
Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Berlin Russian War memorial".
Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.
Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Berlin Russian War memorial"
1
Stangl, Paul. "The Soviet war Memorial in Treptow, Berlin". Geographical Review 93, n.º 2 (1 de abril de 2003): 213–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2003.tb00030.x.
Texto completo da fonte
2
Bozhko, L., e K. Kysliuk. "Memorial tourism as a component of memorial culture". Culture of Ukraine, n.º 78 (23 de dezembro de 2022): 7–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.078.01.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The purpose of the article is to demonstrate the memorial tourism as a component of memorial culture — promising direction of post-war tourism in Ukraine, to determine the reasons for its demand and the role it can play in current cultural situation. Memorial tourism is a new form of memorial activity: the creation of a “place of memory” for committed crimes (museumification of places of tragedies; opening of individual monuments; memorial complexes; museums; exhibitions dedicated to tragic events; creation of organized burials), etc.
The methodology. In the research process, the methods of abstraction, analysis and synthesis were used in the historiographical study of the memorial tourism, empirical method was used for collecting and describing material about the first virtual museums of the Russian-Ukrainian war, content analysis and statistical method were used for comparing the content of popular Telegram news channels about the war with the exhibits of these museums.
The results. The analysis of the literature showed that the phenomenon of memorial tourism has a global character. It becomes part of the global structure of contemporary mediating and tourism narratives of peace, reconciliation and sustainability paradigms. The paradigms of “shared memories” introduce a new vision of war memory as an alternative of the patriotic, aggressive and militarized approach. The authors note that the most expedient is the promotion of Ukraine on the international arena as a “place of memory” for the largest-scale destruction since the Second World War. This is the practice of the first virtual museums of the Russian-Ukrainian war. It currently corresponds to the content of acute cultural memory, represented in one of the most widespread Ukraininan media discourses. This approach will allow the state to popularize civic values, encourage active diplomacy, and stimulate tourism as a tool of economic development.
The scientific novelty. Consideration of the relationship between the theory of memorial tourism and the first practices of museumification of the Russian-Ukrainian war and one of the leading Ukrainian media discourses of its coverage.
The practical significance. The materials of this article can be used to develop programs or strategies for the development of memorial tourism in the war and post-war times in Ukraine.
3
Rubin, Vladimir Aleksandrovich. "The key stages of creation and functionality of the sites of war memorial heritage". Культура и искусство, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2021): 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2021.1.34559.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The relevance of studying the war memorial heritage consists in the adoption of new norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation on protection of historical truth, which implies commemoration of the defenders of the homeland, and heroism of the people. The subject of this article is the stages of creation and functionality of the sites of war memorial heritage in time and in space. The object of this research is the war memorial heritage. The author highlights and analyzes six key stages of creation and functionality of the sites of war memorial heritage: motivational-explanatory (grounds for memorialization); procedural-memorial (procedure for perpetuation of the memory); maintenance-protective (repair, restoration, improvement; prevention of unlawful actions (inaction) with regards to the sites of war memorial heritage); mobilization (relocation of a war memorial site); destructive (demolition, damage); constructive-restorative (reconstruction of a site). The scientific novelty consists in comprehension of the key stages of creation and functionality of the sites of war memorial heritage, which is of scientific, theoretical and practical interest for the development of effective cultural strategies in the future. The conclusion is made that the period of creation and functionality of the war memorial sites is characterized by the presence of six key stages. The tangible component of a site can be subjected to destructive processes, including demolition. However, sustainability of the symbolic component allows subsequent regeneration of tangible mediums of the monuments, which is confirmed by constructive-restorative activity. The author underlines the antagonism of the tangible and symbolic components of war memorial heritage, in the context of which tangible is constantly subject to modernization, while symbolic should remain unchanged.
4
Shchepetkov, Nikolay I., e Tatyana N. Zavgorodskaya. "Remembrance Light At Memorial Sites". Volume 28, Number 6, 2020, n.º 03-2020 (dezembro de 2020): 136–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.33383/2020-028.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Everyone in Russia has been preparing to the 75th anniversary of the victory in World War Two despite the fact that the state-level commemoration events are being impeded by the global disaster which may be compared to a world war: the COVID‑19 pandemic. Like a war, it will eventually end but the memory about the anniversary must and will live on. Therefore, the subject of the article is topical: commemoration light and memory in light of an eternal flame and artistic and sacral illumination (Tribute in Light, like it was in New York in 2001). Numerous issues of architectural lighting of memorial sites and monuments in different Russian cities are under consideration. Positive and negative examples of light design solutions are described. It is also noted that information on contemporary state of this area is extremely insufficient.
5
Goldin, Vladislav I. "The Russian Civil War: History and Memory". Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series Humanitarian and Social Sciences, n.º 6 (15 de dezembro de 2020): 113–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-v069.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
This paper covers the results of the All-Russian Scientific Conference “Allied Intervention and the Civil War in the Russian North: Key Problems, Historical Memory and Lessons of History” that was held in Arkhangelsk in September 10–11, 2020. Scholars from 14 regions of Russia as well as from Ukraine and Norway took part. The participants discussed important problems of the War’s origins and reasons, contemporary conceptualization, results and consequences, historical lessons and memory about the war, as well as the role of Allied Intervention in Russia and the Russian North. In addition, the questions of dialectic of Allied Intervention and the Civil War in Russia and the Russian North were considered, as well as the War’s international, national, regional and local dimensions, its military, political, economic, social, and cultural processes, and the issue of humans in the war. The participants attended the opening of the Yuryev Military Line memorial in the military-historical park located at the battlefield of 1918–1919 along Arkhangelsk–Moscow railroad.
6
Chedzhemov, Sergey R. "Memorial War in the Modern World: History and Theory". Vestnik of North Ossetian State University, n.º 1 (25 de março de 2022): 69–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.29025/1994-77120-2022-1-69-75.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
2022 marks the anniversary of the Battle of the Caucasus, one of the fateful battles of the Great Patriotic War. The multinational Russian people are sensitive to the historical memory of their heroic ancestors, the great feat of the Soviet people who saved Europe and the whole world from fascist enslavement. This fully applies to the residents of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania. However, today in the world the “cold” war and the détente of international tensions have been replaced by the “memorial” war. Historical reality and people’s memory are distorted, monuments to the dead are overthrown. Scientists engaged in the analysis of historical and legal problems need to do everything possible to defend historical truth and expose lies and distort the results of World War II. The authors, based on the analysis of normative and historical sources, focus on the problems of the so-called “memorial war”, the factors that determine the current state of our society, which needs to build up and modernize the system of patriotic educational work based on historical search. The article applies an interdisciplinary approach that allows using the methods of historical and historical-legal research, which is consistent with the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated November 10, 2017 №. 1093 on the approval of a new nomenclature of scientific specialties. This makes the issues raised in the article very relevant. The materials of the article can be used in the methodology of teaching historical disciplines, conducting educational work in educational institutions.
7
de Courville, Stanislas. "Lambeaux de monde". Chiasmi International 25 (2023): 73–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/chiasmi20232511.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The Russian invasion of 2022 was based on an organized process of influence on the Ukrainian population, aimed at obtaining their support or neutralizing their possible resistance, in concert with the state apparatus. We find, in the backdrop of this process, the memorial conflict between these two countries and their neighbours, concerning World War II and the Soviet Union. This war of influence, or political warfare, which falls within new forms of contemporary hybrid warfare, profoundly has to do with images, especially moving images. The cinematic images, the debauchery of their propaganda during the Second World War and throughout the existence of the USSR, still weighs on the bodies and minds; the new media has in many ways inherented them and their way of reenacting or extending propaganda on an individual or group scale. We will then question the place of images, and in particular those in motion, in the war between Russia and Ukraine since 2014 to describe the way in which they have served or still serve the military-memorial device deployed by the Russian invader.
8
Herasymchuk, Volodymyr. "Commemorative Practices During the War: Bohdan Mazur’s project Memory of Civilian Victims". ARTISTIC CULTURE. TOPICAL ISSUES, n.º 20(1) (22 de abril de 2024): 104–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31500/1992-5514.20(1).2024.306919.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The article explores actual issues related to the memorial aspect of commemorating the fallen civilians of Ukraine as a result of russian aggression, focusing on the creative aspects of the commemorative issue in the space of urban architecture and forms of social communication aimed at creating such memorial zones as a part of the collective memory and commemorative policy of the state as a whole. The aim of the paper is to analyze creative practices and socio-cultural (institutional) interactions that strive to implement memorial cultural policy during the war. The subject field of the article is the practical implementation of the idea of the memorial architectural project In Memory of Civilian Victims by Bohdan Mazur, a famous Ukrainian sculptor. It is on the example of the implementation of B. Mazur’s memorial project that the author highlights contradictory approaches and views, problem areas of this project’s implementation: from the forms of memorialization of tragic events to the ways of communicating with authorities, opinion leaders, and professional experts on this issue in the context of wartime.
9
Goldin, V. I. "On the Ways of Comprehension of the Civil War in Russia: Key Problems and Historical Memory". Modern History of Russia 11, n.º 2 (2021): 518–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu24.2021.214.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
This article describes the all-Russian scientific conference “International Intervention and Civil War in Russia and the Russian North: key problems, historical memory, and lessons of history”, held in Arkhangelsk, September 10–11, 2020. Co-organizers of the conference were the Russian Military-Historical Society and its Arkhangelsk branch, the Government of the Arkhangelsk Region, the M. V. Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University , and the Association of the Russian Civil War Scholars. Conference sponsors were the Russian Military- Historical Society and the Government of the Arkhangelsk Region. Established and younger scholars from 14 regions of Russia, as well as from Ukraine and Norway, took part in the conference and its proceedings. Conference participators considered the key problems of genesis, origins, and causes for the Russian Civil War, its modern conceptualization, the role of international intervention in Russia and the Russian North, results, consequences, and historical lessons of this war. Special attention was given to preparing of Volume XII (in two books), Civil War in Russia, 1917–1922, of the 20-volume academic series History of Russia and problems of historical and cultural memory of the Russian Civil War. Four sections and three roundtables considered questions of the dialectical relationship of international intervention and Civil War in Russia and the Russian North; of international, national, regional, and local dimensions of the Civil War; and of the individual at war. Conference participators pointed out the necessity of responsible, competent, and objective historical studies of the Russian Civil War, an attitude of care towards existing monuments and memorials, and strict examination and scientific expertise of new memorial projects devoted to this war.
10
Vasiliev, A. A., A. E. Uzhanov e Yu V. Pechatnova. "Memorial Law: National and International Aspects". Journal of Law and Administration 19, n.º 4 (6 de fevereiro de 2024): 63–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2023-4-69-63-84.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Introduction. This article conducts an interdisciplinary study of memory policy, which includes terminological explication and legal analysis of concepts similar in meaning, assessment of the relevance and need to legalize terms related to memory policy, determination of the effectiveness of official memory policy, prediction of its political and social consequences in the long term and exploring the normative limits of national memorial legislation. The purpose of the study is the conceptualization of memorial law.Materials and methods. The main research method is participant observation of the processes of implementation in Russian society and abroad of the concepts of national, historical and social memory, as well as the construction of norms and regulations for establishing legal relations in the field of conservation of military memorial heritage objects. Methods of express diagnostics of problem situations, legal assessment of incidents, sociological and expert surveys (including questionnaires and testing), and modeling were used.Research results. As a result of the study, the need to develop a special federal law on the protection of the military memorial heritage of the Russian Federation, as well as the development of an international (universal) Charter (Convention) on the protection of military memorial heritage sites formed as a result of the Second World War, was substantiated. Discussion and conclusion. It has been established that there is no single position in the scientific community regarding the need for memorial legislation. This largely depends on the political and ideological preferences of a particular author. At the same time, it was concluded that in legal science the conceptual foundations for the formation of memorial law as a special legal complex for the preservation, transmission and protection of historical memory and memorial (war memorial) heritage have been poorly studied. In addition, both at the level of legal doctrine and according to law enforcement practice, the issue of the status and legal means of preserving military memorial heritage has been practically not studied. In this connection, the authors propose the development of a Union Nation Charter for the Protection of Military Memorial Heritage for the purpose of holistic and comprehensive legal regulation of the area under study.
Teses / dissertações sobre o assunto "Berlin Russian War memorial"
1
Pack, Stephanie. "The post-war division of Berlin and its social effects, as illustrated by the translations of three short stories by Ingeborg Drewitz /". Internet access available to MUN users only, 2003. http://collections.mun.ca/u?/theses,171892.
Texto completo da fonteLivros sobre o assunto "Berlin Russian War memorial"
1
Popelʹ, Nikolaĭ. Vperedi Berlin. Moskva: Izd-vo AST, 2001.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
2
Osi︠a︡nin, Sasha. 1945 god Berlin: Podopechnyĭ. Moskva: Zebra E, 2020.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
3
Vasilʹev, Aleksandr. Memorial. Moskva: "Molodai͡a︡ gvardii͡a︡", 1986.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
4
Vassiltchikov, Marie. The Berlin diaries, 1940-45. New York, N.Y: Knopf, 1987.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
5
Nikolaeva, Natalʹi︠a︡ Vitalʹevna, e N. A. Kabanova. Seligerskiĭ memorial: Po materialam gazety "Seliger". Ostashkov: ID "Vetla", 2020.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
6
V, Grigorʹev V. Desant v Berlin. Moskva: Izd-vo DOSAAF SSSR, 1989.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
7
Karlova, O. A. Krasnoi︠a︡rsk--Berlin: 1941--1945 : 65-letneĭ godovshchine Velikoĭ Pobedy posvi︠a︡shchaetsi︠a︡. Krasnoi︠a︡rsk: Polikor, 2010.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
8
Vassiltchikov, Marie. Berlin diaries, 1940-1945. New York: Knopf, 1987.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
9
Berlin diaries, 1940-1945. New York: Vintage Books, 1988.
Encontre o texto completo da fonte
10
Vassiltchikov, Marie. The Berlin diaries, 1940-1945. London: Chatto & Windus, 1985.
Encontre o texto completo da fonteCapítulos de livros sobre o assunto "Berlin Russian War memorial"
1
Cohen, Aaron J. "Neither Here Nor There: War Memorial Landscape in Imperial Russia, the Soviet Union, and the Russian Emigration, 1914–1939". In Landscapes of the First World War, 173–91. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89411-9_10.
Texto completo da fonte
2
Mikaberidze, Alexander. "Walking the Tightrope, 1801–1804". In Kutuzov, 168–80. Oxford University PressNew York, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197546734.003.0011.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Abstract This chapter describes Alexander’s ascension. This was greeted with elation in Russian society, which hoped to leave behind memories of Alexander’s father’s reign. The new monarch remained torn between the liberal views impressed upon him by his republican tutor Frédéric-César de La Harpe and the hard reality of being the autocrat of a vast and conservative empire. The chapter details the familial drama that reinforced this duality as Alexander sought to navigate the contrasting worlds of his father and grandmother. The chapter talks about Mikhail Kutuzov being in the middle of rancorous power struggles where, in a foreign diplomat’s words, too many undercurrents converged and clashed. Kutuzov’s prior diplomatic mission to Berlin had acquainted Kutuzov with Nikita Panin, who admired his abilities.
3
Tromly, Benjamin. "Spies, Sex, and Balloons". In Cold War Exiles and the CIA, 192–216. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840404.003.0008.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Chapter 8 examines the Russian exiles’ anti-communist activities in divided Germany and particularly Berlin, the city whose penetrable internal border made it the essential base for Cold War human-intelligence activities. The CIA utilized the NTS and another Russian organization, the Central Representation of Postwar Emigrants (TsOPE), in operations devoted to inciting defection among Soviet soldiers and civilians positioned in East Germany. Utilizing documents from the East German Ministry for State Security, the chapter examines the Berlin operations and the Soviet and East German actions to thwart them. It focuses attention on how Russian exile agendas in Germany became reliant on the East German civilians who were recruited to spread propaganda and interact with Soviet soldiers and civilians. In this way, the espionage conflicts in Berlin were a transnational affair involving cross-national contacts and networks.
4
Caute, David. "The Russian Question: A Russian Play". In The Dancer Defects, 88–116. Oxford University PressOxford, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199249084.003.0005.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Abstract Among Soviet dramas of the early cold war, Konstantin Simonov’s play The Russian Question (Russkii vopros) merits a chapter to itself. It was probably unique in confining its dramatis personae to American characters-not a Russian in sight. The Russian Question was the cold war play par excellence, promoted and disseminated with Stalin’s approval in thirty Soviet theatres. In Germany the Soviet-zone premie’re followed within a month of the opening night in Moscow, despite a storm of American protests, by which time German-language translations were already on sale at Berlin kiosks. Two weeks later the Soviet Embassy in London put out an English translation; news of a Stalin Prize soon followed. Production plans for Mikhail Romm’s film of the play were announced almost immediately. At the end of the year, with the play still running, Stalin, Molotov, and Voroshilov appeared in the ‘royal box’ at the Moscow Art Theatre, the ultimate seal of approval.
5
Henzler, Petra. "Chapter 16 THE FIRST COLD WAR MEMORIAL IN BERLIN A Short Inquiry into Europe, the Cold War, and Memory Cultures". In Cold War Cultures, 347–69. Berghahn Books, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780857452443-018.
Texto completo da fonte
6
Lowenstein, Steven M. "The Seven Years War (1756-1763) and the Emergence of a New Economic Elite". In The Berlin Jewish Community, 25–32. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083262.003.0003.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Abstract The seven years of war between Prussia and its French, Austrian, and Russian enemies (1756-1763) have long been recognized as playing an important role in the transformation of Berlin Jewry. Before the war began, the Berlin Jewish community had shown very few signs of being anything but a typical traditional Jewish community. By the end of the war, on the other hand, the conditions were clearly in place for the first phase of the modernization process of Berlin Jewry. The new Jewish elite that emerged during the war would have a double effect on making possible the important cultural transformations of that first phase. First, they would live in a cultural style that had not hitherto been common even for wealthy Berlin Jews. Second, they would become the chief supporters and protectors of a Jewish Enlightenment movement, which came to prominence in the third quarter of the eighteenth century in Berlin. Even though the official policies of Frederick II of Prussia changed little during the latter half of his reign, the emergence of a new acculturated elite induced the government to make increasing numbers of exceptions to its harsh policies. It was during the Seven Years War that the government and outside observers began to think in terms of a small number of “exceptional Jews.”
7
Ryan, Alan. "Isaiah Berlin 1909–1997". In Proceedings of the British Academy Volume 130, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows, IV. British Academy, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263501.003.0001.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Isaiah Berlin (1909–1997), a Fellow of the British Academy, was an extraordinary obituarist and memorialist. In the 1930s, Berlin was part of a small group of young and iconoclastic philosophers that included John Austin, Stuart Hampshire, and A. J. Ayer. Ayer was an early convert to logical positivism while Austin, Hampshire and Berlin were not. Berlin’s career was first interrupted and then spectacularly accelerated by the outbreak of World War II. The years he spent in Washington brought Berlin into close contact with the makers of American foreign policy and reshaped his sense of what he might do with his life. Even more important were his postwar encounters with Russian poets, novelists, dramatists and other intellectuals in the winter of 1945–1946. During the 1950s, Berlin became an important figure outside academic life in the broader cultural life of Britain. One of his more surprising insights was that the existence of the state of Israel was a necessity for Jews everywhere. He remained a confirmed liberal Zionist and a good friend of Chaim Weizmann, the first President of Israel.
8
Agbokou, Isidore E. "The Russian-Ukrainian Conflict". In Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, 71–98. IGI Global, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8521-7.ch005.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Thirty-three years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, one thing is obvious: The resolution of several international crises still depends on relations between the West and Russia. Like it or not, this geopolitical situation is a fact which, however, Americans and Europeans have not been duly taken into consideration since 1989. This crisis, which has not stopped, experienced a more expansive phase on February 24, 2022: it is the Russian special military operation for some leaders in Ukraine, Russian interventionism for others, and the war in Ukraine for still others. It is particularly notable in the soaring prices of raw materials essential for the functioning of industries. The Ukrainian crisis has revealed the fragilities of the dependence of certain States and Unions on raw materials, but also certain military fragilities. A critical situation therefore prevails, and many hypotheses remain perceptible given the existence of several scenarios and possible balances. This insight analyzes the current geopolitical situation between blocs and considers a possible vision of the blocs by 2050.
9
Tromly, Benjamin. "Conclusion". In Cold War Exiles and the CIA, 289–300. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840404.003.0012.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
Russian émigré activities took place in crowded meeting halls, in Bavarian hotels, in Frankfurt print shops, in posh New York office buildings, at balloon launch sites in German forests, and in the more intimate setting of safe houses in West Berlin. In the late 1950s, the émigrés’ struggle to free Russia found a new setting: tourist centers in Western Europe. With the slow opening up of the USSR after Stalin’s death, the CIA increasingly focused its human-intelligence operations on the exploitation of different forms of cross-bloc movement such as tourism, travel by official delegations, and academic exchanges....
10
Mirsepassi, Ali. "Among the Nationalists in Berlin, 1922–1929". In The Discovery of Iran, 71–84. Stanford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503629141.003.0003.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
This chapter examines the interwar history of Iran, focusing on the Pahlavi state’s assumption of power and Iran’s occupation by British, Russian, and Ottoman forces during World War I. It assesses how Iranians in 1920s Berlin responded to these events, and examines their political activities and written output. It argues that an overtly racialist strand of Iranian nationalism, which sought to situate Iran in the arena of Aryan nations contra its Arab and Turkish neighbors, developed a response to pan-Turkism and Ottoman nationalism, which was encapsulated in Roshani Beik’s arguments for the “Turkishness” of Iranian Azerbaijan.
Trabalhos de conferências sobre o assunto "Berlin Russian War memorial"
1
Daria, Borisova. "ESTATE OF L.I. KASHINA IN THE VILLAGE OF KONSTANTINOVO IN THE WAR AND POST-WAR YEARS AND ITS RESTORATION". In FIRST KULAKOV READINGS: ON THE FIELDS OF RUSSIA'S MILITARY. LCC MAKS Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.29003/m3643.khmelita-19/223-234.
Texto completo da fonteResumo:
The article discusses the history of estate of L.I. Kashina in the village of Konstantinovo. A detailed description of the estate complex for the memorial period (the beginning of the XX century) is given, made on the basis of preserved memories and the results of scientific and design work of the Soviet and Russian times, including the central part of the estate, the Upper and Lower Parks, the Lord's Foothills. Further, the author gives the state of the estate in the war and post-war years. The changes occurring with the structure of the estate and its preservation as a whole are briefly displayed, information is provided on the destruction of the original buildings and the construction of new buildings necessary to fulfill urgent tasks. The gradual revival of the object of cultural heritage of federal significance is considered in more detail, including scientific research conducted at various times, restoration of park plantings and road network, demolition of disharmonious Soviet buildings, restoration of lost economic structures. The prospects for further restoration of the estate related to the restoration of the pond and the territory of the Lower Park have also been determined.