Artigos de revistas: "Animal communication"

1

WAAL, FRANS B. M. "Animal Communication". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1000, n.º 1 (24 de janeiro de 2006): 79–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1280.006.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

2

Kaplan, Gisela. "Animal communication". Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 5, n.º 6 (8 de outubro de 2014): 661–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1321.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

3

AHMED, Khalid Ahmed Hassan. "INTERSECTIONAL PERSPECTIVES OF HUMAN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION". International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research 03, n.º 03 (1 de junho de 2021): 80–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.3-3.9.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This study aims at reviewing a bulk of related studies, and some verses from the Holly Qur'an in order to discover some mysteries of human animal communication. We believe that the majority of the previous studies concern themselves with human attempts to teach human speech to animals. There are a lot of mysteries that surround human animal communication. Furthermore, there are some intersections between human and animals’ ways of interaction. We believe that human speech is one of the most amazing human properties; at the same time, we believe that animals have very advanced ways of communication. However, humans and animals have the access to be involved in interaction and communications with each other and with other species of animals. Our mere observations could maintain this hypothesis of joined human animal communications. This study is an attempt to establish a theoretical framework on which humans and animals can interact and communicate jointly among themselves and other types of animals as well. To process the study some of the related studies will be outlined, discussed and analyzed, and then they will be correlated with the findings of the selected Holly Qur’an verses. Out of these studies some assumptions will be outlined in order to be treated through the discussion, results and recommendations for further studies..

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

4

Reed, Lauren P. "Animal Communication Networks". Condor 108, n.º 2 (2006): 485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2006)108[485:acn]2.0.co;2.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

5

Kulick, Don. "Human–Animal Communication". Annual Review of Anthropology 46, n.º 1 (23 de outubro de 2017): 357–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041723.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

6

Reed, Lauren P. "Animal Communication Networks". Condor 108, n.º 2 (1 de maio de 2006): 485–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/condor/108.2.485.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

7

Holopainen, Jarmo K. "Plant–animal communication". Annals of Botany 111, n.º 2 (12 de dezembro de 2012): vii. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs273.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

8

SIMON, M. "Animal communication: Do animals mean what they say?" Journal of Social and Biological Systems 9, n.º 4 (outubro de 1986): 365–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-1750(86)90242-3.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

9

Chen, Yihua. "Comparison Between Animal Communication and Language". Communications in Humanities Research 12, n.º 1 (20 de novembro de 2023): 68–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/12/20230045.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Language is a structured system that consists of grammar and vocabulary. Although animals communicate with each other, it has remained unsettled that whether animals use language. As Pearce concluded four main elements of language (arbitrariness of units, semanticity, displacement and productivity), this paper aims to evaluate animal communication according to these criteria and figure out their ability to learn language by studying the experiments conducted by scientists before. As a result, this paper found that animal communication met the criterion of semanticity, but failed to meet other criteria, especially the criterion of displacement and productivity, and it is very hard to teach them language. It is argued that they showed no evidence of using language even after they were taught some elements of it. The conclusion indicated that animals do not have language considering the evidence drawn from the studies before. However, it is also suggested that further studies are needed to find a better way to study animal communication and more suitable criteria for them. Signs also showed that animals may develop language referring to these criteria in the future.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

10

Ravignani, Andrea, e Koen de Reus. "Modelling Animal Interactive Rhythms in Communication". Evolutionary Bioinformatics 15 (janeiro de 2019): 117693431882355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1176934318823558.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Time is one crucial dimension conveying information in animal communication. Evolution has shaped animals’ nervous systems to produce signals with temporal properties fitting their socio-ecological niches. Many quantitative models of mechanisms underlying rhythmic behaviour exist, spanning insects, crustaceans, birds, amphibians, and mammals. However, these computational and mathematical models are often presented in isolation. Here, we provide an overview of the main mathematical models employed in the study of animal rhythmic communication among conspecifics. After presenting basic definitions and mathematical formalisms, we discuss each individual model. These computational models are then compared using simulated data to uncover similarities and key differences in the underlying mechanisms found across species. Our review of the empirical literature is admittedly limited. We stress the need of using comparative computer simulations – both before and after animal experiments – to better understand animal timing in interaction. We hope this article will serve as a potential first step towards a common computational framework to describe temporal interactions in animals, including humans.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

11

Schutten, Julie Kalil. "Perspectives on human-animal communication: internatural communication". Environmental Communication 9, n.º 1 (2 de janeiro de 2015): 137–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.1002242.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

12

Ryan, Michael J., e Marc D. Hauser. "Animal Communication and Evolution". Evolution 51, n.º 4 (agosto de 1997): 1333. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2411064.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

13

Goodman, Robert S. "Animal Communication Treasure Hunt". American Biology Teacher 58, n.º 4 (1 de abril de 1996): 224–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4450129.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

14

Garstang, Michael. "Animal communication in context". Physics Today 73, n.º 8 (1 de agosto de 2020): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.4534.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

15

Peppin, Richard J. "Animal communication in context". Physics Today 73, n.º 8 (1 de agosto de 2020): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.4535.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

16

Laidre, Mark E. "Principles of Animal Communication". Animal Behaviour 83, n.º 3 (março de 2012): 865–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.014.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

17

Symes, Laurel B., e Trevor D. Price. "Animal communication and noise". Animal Behaviour 108 (outubro de 2015): 43–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.013.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

18

Newton, R. P. "Communication within animal cells". FEBS Letters 310, n.º 1 (21 de setembro de 1992): 93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(92)81161-e.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

19

Flack, Jessica C. "Animal Communication: Hidden Complexity". Current Biology 23, n.º 21 (novembro de 2013): R967—R969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.001.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

20

Hanley, Michael R. "Communication within animal cells". Trends in Cell Biology 2, n.º 11 (novembro de 1992): 349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0962-8924(92)90185-p.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

21

Ryan, Michael J. "ANIMAL COMMUNICATION AND EVOLUTION". Evolution 51, n.º 4 (agosto de 1997): 1333–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03982.x.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

22

Howard, Ralph. "Principles of Animal Communication". American Entomologist 45, n.º 2 (1999): 126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ae/45.2.126.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

23

Brumm, Henrik, e Peter Slater. "Animal Communication: Timing Counts". Current Biology 17, n.º 13 (julho de 2007): R521—R523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.053.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

24

Zuberbühler, Klaus. "Syntax and compositionality in animal communication". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375, n.º 1789 (18 de novembro de 2019): 20190062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0062.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Syntax has been found in animal communication but only humans appear to have generative, hierarchically structured syntax. How did syntax evolve? I discuss three theories of evolutionary transition from animal to human syntax: computational capacity, structural flexibility and event perception. The computation hypothesis is supported by artificial grammar experiments consistently showing that only humans can learn linear stimulus sequences with an underlying hierarchical structure, a possible by-product of computationally powerful large brains. The structural flexibility hypothesis is supported by evidence of meaning-bearing combinatorial and permutational signal sequences in animals, with sometimes compositional features, but no evidence for generativity or hierarchical structure. Again, animals may be constrained by computational limits in short-term memory but possibly also by limits in articulatory control and social cognition. The event categorization hypothesis, finally, posits that humans are cognitively predisposed to analyse natural events by assigning agency and assessing how agents impact on patients, a propensity that is reflected by the basic syntactic units in all languages. Whether animals perceive natural events in the same way is largely unknown, although event perception may provide the cognitive grounding for syntax evolution. This article is part of the theme issue ‘What can animal communication teach us about human language?’

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

25

Larom, David, Michael Garstang, Katharine Payne e Richard Raspet. "Surface meteorology and animal communication". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102, n.º 5 (novembro de 1997): 3124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.420598.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

26

Naguib, Marc, e J. Jordan Price. "The evolution of animal communication". Behaviour 150, n.º 9-10 (2013): 950–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003098.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

27

Di Paolo, Ezequiel A. "The Design of Animal Communication". Adaptive Behavior 8, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2000): 75–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105971230000800105.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

28

Radner, Daisie. "DIRECTED ACTION AND ANIMAL COMMUNICATION". Ratio 6, n.º 2 (dezembro de 1993): 135–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.1993.tb00143.x.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

29

Mortensen, Chris. "Private states and animal communication". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, n.º 4 (dezembro de 1993): 658–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00032234.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

30

Plous, S. "Animal models of human communication". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, n.º 4 (dezembro de 1993): 660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00032258.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

31

Hauser, Marc D., e Douglas A. Nelson. "‘Intentional’ signaling in Animal communication". Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6, n.º 6 (junho de 1991): 186–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90211-f.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

32

Bradbury, Jack W., e Sandra L. Vehrencamp. "Economic models of animal communication". Animal Behaviour 59, n.º 2 (fevereiro de 2000): 259–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1330.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

33

Beckers, Gabriel J. L., e Johan J. Bolhuis. "The Design of Animal Communication". Animal Behaviour 60, n.º 5 (novembro de 2000): 703–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1532.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

34

Telkänranta, Helena. "Conditioning or cognition? Understanding interspecific communication as a way of improving animal training (a case study with elephants in Nepal)". Sign Systems Studies 37, n.º 3/4 (1 de dezembro de 2009): 542–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/sss.2009.37.3-4.09.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

When animals are trained to function in a human society (for example, pet dogs, police dogs, or sports horses), different trainers and training cultures vary widely in their ability to understand how the animal perceives the communication efforts of the trainer. This variation has considerable impact on the resulting performance and welfare of the animals. There are many trainers who frequently resort to physical punishment or other pain-inflicting methods when the attempts to communicate have failed or when the trainer is unaware of the full range of the potential forms of human-animal communication. Negative consequences of this include animal suffering, imperfect performance of the animals, and sometimes risks to humans, as repeated pain increases aggression in some animals. The field of animal training is also interesting from a semiotic point of view, as it effectively illustrates the differences between the distinct forms of interaction that are included in the concept of communication in the zoosemiotic discourse. The distinctions with the largest potential in improving human-animal communication in animal training, is understanding the difference between verbal communication of the kind that requires rather high cognitive capabilities of the animal, and communication based on conditioning, which is a form of animal learning that does not require high cognitive ability. The differences and potentials of various types of human-animal communication are discussed in the form of a case study of a novel project run by a NGO called Working Elephant Programme of Asia (WEPA), which introduces humane, science-based training and handling methods as an alternative to the widespread use of pain and fear that is the basis of most existing elephant training methods.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

35

Gingras, Sophie. "Béatrice GALLINON-MÉLÉNEC (dir.), Homme/Animal : Quelles relations ? Quelles communications ?" Communication, Vol. 25/1 (15 de novembro de 2006): 318–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/communication.322.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

36

MacDougall-Shackleton, Scott A. "Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication". Ethology 107, n.º 7 (24 de julho de 2001): 671–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.0686f.x.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

37

Tierney, David. "“The Poetry of a Dingo’s Bite”". Extrapolation 65, n.º 1 (14 de abril de 2024): 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/extr.2024.3.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Science fiction has an extensive history of attempting to breach the communication boundary between humans and nonhuman animals by giving nonhuman animals some semblance of human language, with many uplift stories having them speak near-perfect English, their minds being filtered through a human linguistic framework, partly or wholly erasing their voice. Building on the examination of nonhuman animal gestural communication in Brian Massumi’s What Animals Teach Us about Politics (2014), this paper analyses how two works, Ursula K. Le Guin’s “‘The Author of the Acacia Seeds’ and Other Extracts from the Journal of the Association of Therolinguistics” (1974) and Laura Jean McKay’s The Animals in That Country (2020) depict animal behavior in itself as being creative and language-like. Neither story offers a straightforward translation from nonhuman to human, each showing how human linguistic frameworks leave gaps for the untranslatable complexities in nonhuman animal gestures. This I suggest shows that further exploration of nonhuman animal communication in science fiction can allow us to move beyond ideas of human exceptionalism and logocentrism and can turn the hierarchical scale of communication into more of a spectrum with various communication types.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

38

Pouw, Wim, Shannon Proksch, Linda Drijvers, Marco Gamba, Judith Holler, Christopher Kello, Rebecca S. Schaefer e Geraint A. Wiggins. "Multilevel rhythms in multimodal communication". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376, n.º 1835 (23 de agosto de 2021): 20200334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0334.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

It is now widely accepted that the brunt of animal communication is conducted via several modalities, e.g. acoustic and visual, either simultaneously or sequentially. This is a laudable multimodal turn relative to traditional accounts of temporal aspects of animal communication which have focused on a single modality at a time. However, the fields that are currently contributing to the study of multimodal communication are highly varied, and still largely disconnected given their sole focus on a particular level of description or their particular concern with human or non-human animals. Here, we provide an integrative overview of converging findings that show how multimodal processes occurring at neural, bodily, as well as social interactional levels each contribute uniquely to the complex rhythms that characterize communication in human and non-human animals. Though we address findings for each of these levels independently, we conclude that the most important challenge in this field is to identify how processes at these different levels connect. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Synchrony and rhythm interaction: from the brain to behavioural ecology’.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

39

Vigors, Belinda. "Citizens’ and Farmers’ Framing of ‘Positive Animal Welfare’ and the Implications for Framing Positive Welfare in Communication". Animals 9, n.º 4 (4 de abril de 2019): 147. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9040147.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Human perception can depend on how an individual frames information in thought and how information is framed in communication. For example, framing something positively, instead of negatively, can change an individual’s response. This is of relevance to ‘positive animal welfare’, which places greater emphasis on farm animals being provided with opportunities for positive experiences. However, little is known about how this framing of animal welfare may influence the perception of key animal welfare stakeholders. Through a qualitative interview study with farmers and citizens, undertaken in Scotland, UK, this paper explores what positive animal welfare evokes to these key welfare stakeholders and highlights the implications of such internal frames for effectively communicating positive welfare in society. Results indicate that citizens make sense of positive welfare by contrasting positive and negative aspects of welfare, and thus frame it as animals having ‘positive experiences’ or being ‘free from negative experiences’. Farmers draw from their existing frames of animal welfare to frame positive welfare as ‘good husbandry’, ‘proactive welfare improvement’ or the ‘animal’s point of view’. Implications of such internal frames (e.g., the triggering of ‘negative welfare’ associations by the word ‘positive’) for the effective communication of positive welfare are also presented.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

40

Brainard, Michael S., e W. Tecumseh Fitch. "Editorial overview: Communication and language: Animal communication and human language". Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28 (outubro de 2014): v—viii. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.015.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

41

Hill, Peggy S. M. "Vibration and Animal Communication: A Review1". American Zoologist 41, n.º 5 (outubro de 2001): 1135–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1668/0003-1569(2001)041[1135:vaacar]2.0.co;2.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

42

Haskell, David G. "ANIMAL VOCAL COMMUNICATION: A NEW APPROACH". Wilson Bulletin 112, n.º 2 (junho de 2000): 299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0299:br]2.0.co;2.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

43

Awbrey, Frank T. "Modeling noise interference with animal communication". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94, n.º 3 (setembro de 1993): 1850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.407692.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

44

Hebets, Eileen A., Andrew B. Barron, Christopher N. Balakrishnan, Mark E. Hauber, Paul H. Mason e Kim L. Hoke. "A systems approach to animal communication". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283, n.º 1826 (16 de março de 2016): 20152889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2889.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Why animal communication displays are so complex and how they have evolved are active foci of research with a long and rich history. Progress towards an evolutionary analysis of signal complexity, however, has been constrained by a lack of hypotheses to explain similarities and/or differences in signalling systems across taxa. To address this, we advocate incorporating a systems approach into studies of animal communication—an approach that includes comprehensive experimental designs and data collection in combination with the implementation of systems concepts and tools. A systems approach evaluates overall display architecture, including how components interact to alter function, and how function varies in different states of the system. We provide a brief overview of the current state of the field, including a focus on select studies that highlight the dynamic nature of animal signalling. We then introduce core concepts from systems biology (redundancy, degeneracy, pluripotentiality, and modularity) and discuss their relationships with system properties (e.g. robustness, flexibility, evolvability). We translate systems concepts into an animal communication framework and accentuate their utility through a case study. Finally, we demonstrate how consideration of the system-level organization of animal communication poses new practical research questions that will aid our understanding of how and why animal displays are so complex.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

45

Johnson, Karl F. "Communication Within Animal Cells.Greg J. Barritt". Quarterly Review of Biology 68, n.º 4 (dezembro de 1993): 580–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/418327.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

46

Ord, Terry J., e Judy A. Stamps. "Species Identity Cues in Animal Communication". American Naturalist 174, n.º 4 (outubro de 2009): 585–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/605372.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

47

Janik, Vincent M. "Nature and nurture in animal communication". Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, n.º 3 (9 de maio de 2001): 523–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.0288f.x.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

48

Janik, Vincent M. "Nature and nurture in animal communication". Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, n.º 4 (20 de dezembro de 2001): 681–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.0311b.x.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

49

Seyfarth, Robert M., e Dorothy L. Cheney. "Signalers and Receivers in Animal Communication". Annual Review of Psychology 54, n.º 1 (fevereiro de 2003): 145–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145121.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

50

Hill, Peggy S. M. "Vibration and Animal Communication: A Review". American Zoologist 41, n.º 5 (outubro de 2001): 1135–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.5.1135.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Artigos de revistas sobre o tema "Animal communication"

Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos