Artigos de revistas sobre o tema "1891-1936"

Seventeen auchenorrhynchan species of the family Cicadellidae are recorded from Greece for the first time: Euscelidius variegatus (Kirschbaum 1858), Euscelis ohausi (Wagner 1939), Psammotettix notatus (Melichar 1896), Psammotettix striatus (Linnaeus 1758), Psammotettix sabulicola (Curtis 1837), Anzygina honiloa (Kirkaldy 1906), Arboridia versuta (Melichar 1897), Edwardsiana ishidae (Matsumura 1932), Edwardsiana tersa (Edwards 1914), Eupteryx decemnotata (Rey 1891), Eupteryx curtisii (Flor 1861), Eupteryx rostrata (Ribaut 1936), Frutioidia sanguinosa (Rey 1891), Zygina rosea (Flor 1861), Zygina suavis (Rey 1891), Zygina tiliae (Fallen 1806), Anaceratagallia frisia (Wagner 1939). Faunistic and distributional data notes are given for each species and a complete, updated species checklist for Greece is provided.

AbstractThis article reconsiders the life of Ellen Wilkinson (1891–1947) – British Minister of Education from 1945 to 1947 and leader of the Jarrow Crusade of 1936 – by exploring the transnational aspect of her politics. It seeks to establish the significance of her transnational orientation and how this can allow us to complement and deepen existing understandings of her. Drawing on the literature on transnational activist networks, it outlines the complexity of transnational networks and her repertoire of transnational political practice. Without serious attention to this global dimension of her politics, our understanding of Wilkinson is attenuated and distorted. Crucially, the heroic construction of “Red Ellen” in both labourist and socialist-feminist narratives has obscured her second radicalization (1932–1936) and the sharpness of her metamorphosis into a mainstream Labour Party figure in 1939–1940.

One hundred sixty eight taxa of the genus Agrilus (Coleoptera, Buprestidae) mostly from the Palearctic and Oriental regions are studied and their taxonomic, nomenclatural, distributional or biological data are updated. The following new taxonomic or nomenclatural acts are proposed. The status of four taxa is changed: Agrilus grandiceps hemiphanes Marseul, 1866 is changed from subspecies to species Agrilus hemiphanes stat. nov.; Agrilus lopatini Alexeev, 1964 is changed from species to subspecies Agrilus araxenus lopatini stat. nov.; the specific name hermineus Abeille de Perrin, 1907 is removed from the synonymy of A. lineola as a name of subspecies Agrilus lineola hermineus revalidated name, stat. nov.; Agrilus validiusculus Semenov, 1891 is changed from species to subspecies Agrilus transversesulcatus validiusculus stat. nov.. The following fifteen new synonyms are proposed: grusinus Obenberger, 1917 syn. nov. (synonym of A. transversesulcatus Reitter, 1890); hassani Théry, 1930 syn. nov. (synonym of A. proteus Abeille de Perrin, 1893); ieiunulus Obenberger, 1936 syn. nov. (synonym of A. transversesulcatus validiusculus Semenov, 1891); italicus Obenberger, 1920 syn. nov. (synonym of A. cyanescens Ratzeburg, 1837); juxtasuturalis Abeille de Perrin, 1897 syn. nov. (synonym of A. transversesulcatus Reitter, 1890); niveosignatus Obenberger, 1914 syn. nov. (synonym of A. transversesulcatus validiusculus Semenov, 1891); panchlorus Abeille de Perrin, 1897 syn. nov. (synonym of A. curtulus Mulsant & Rey, 1863); perparvus Obenberger, 1918 syn. nov. (synonym of A. roscidus Kiesenwetter, 1857); philippovi Alexeev, 1965 syn. nov. (synonym of A. vaginalis Abeille de Perrin, 1897); populneus Schaefer, 1946 syn. nov. (synonym of A. suvorovi Obenberger, 1935); rosei Niehuis & Bernhard, 2005 syn. nov. (synonym of A. viridis Linné, 1758); shamyl Obenberger, 1922 syn. nov. (synonym of A. lineola hermineus Abeille de Perrin, 1907); suturisignatus Obenberger, 1924 syn. nov. (synonym of A. transversesulcatus Reitter, 1890); tetrastichus Obenberger, 1924 syn. nov. (synonym of A. fissifrons Fairmaire, 1849) and tifliscus Obenberger, 1936 syn. nov. (synonym of A. transversesulcatus Reitter, 1890). Agrilus grandiceps Kiesenwetter, 1857 is a dubious name of unknown taxonomic concept due to lack of the primary type. The following twenty-seven lectotypes of nominal taxa are designated: A. affectans Obenberger, 1923; A. alacris Kerremans, 1896; A. fidjiensis Obenberger, 1924; A. grusinus Obenberger, 1917; A. hassani Théry, 1930; A. hermineus Abeille de Perrin, 1907; A. hypericicola Abeille de Perrin, 1893; A. ieiunulus Obenberger, 1936; A. limoniastri Bedel, 1886; A. mephistopheles Abeille de Perrin, 1897; A. morio Kerremans, 1895; A. beauprei mourguesi Schaefer, 1954; A. nigrivestis Abeille de Perrin, 1897; A. niveosignatus Obenberger, 1914; A. panchlorus Abeille de Perrin, 1897; A. perparvus Obenberger, 1918; A. proteus Abeille de Perrin, 1893; A. roscidus Kiesenwetter, 1857; A. rumanicus Obenberger, 1924; A. shamyl Obenberger, 1922; A. subroscidus Obenberger, 1924; A. suturisignatus Obenberger, 1924; A. suvorovi Obenberger, 1935; A. fidjiensis tetrastichus Obenberger, 1924; A. tifliscus Obenberger, 1936; A. transversesulcatus Reitter, 1890 and A. validiusculus Semenov, 1891. Additionally, the geographical range or host plant data are updated or revised for many taxa. The North American Agrilus bilineatus (Weber, 1801) is recorded from a single record from Turkey which is the first introduction of a Nearctic Agrilus to the Palearctic fauna.

AbstractThis paper presents the first results of our most recent research on the Bilbao Stock Exchange (BSE) from its foundation in 1890 up to the Spanish Civil War. We examine the origin of the Exchange and follow its evolution over the first half-century of existence. To this end we introduce some of the stock exchange indexes we have calculated for Bilbao and put them into comparative perspective with the existing series on general economic and industrial activity and the indexes for other Spanish exchanges for the period considered. These comparisons show Bilbao’s evolution from a public debt-dominated market to an industrial exchange very much tied to regional development. Finally, we contrast the degree of financial market integration associated with the existing Spanish exchange indexes. Our analysis finds strong support for considering the BSE index as an industrial index and little evidence of capital market integration between the principal Spanish exchanges before the 1920s.

The names of three genera of Dynastinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) are reviewed. The New Guinea genus Beckius Dechambre, 1992 (Dynastini) is preoccupied, and Debeckius Allsopp, new replacement name, is proposed. This results in Debeckius beccarii beccarii (Gestro, 1876), new combination, Debeckius beccarii koletta (Voirin, 1978), new combination, and Debeckius beccarii ryusuii (Nagai, 2006), new combination. The African genus Syrictes Prell, 1936 (Phileurini) is preoccupied, and Kirprellius Allsopp, new combination, is proposed. This results in Kirprellius curvicornus (Endrődi, 1977), new combination, Kirprellius dentatus (Prell, 1912), new combination, Kirprellius marceaui (Bouyer, 2020), new combination, Kirprellius rugulosus (Dupuis, 2013), new combination, and Kirprellius syrichtus (Fabricius, 1775), new combination. “Neoryctes Sclater, 1891” (Mammalia) is shown to be an invalid name and Neoryctes Arrow, 1908 (Pentodontini) remains the valid name for a dynastine genus from the Galápagos Islands, and Notoryctes Stirling, 1891 remains valid for the Australian marsupial moles.

The representation of women artists in the Spanish graphic press in the first third of the 20th century is a field of research that has hardly been approached, which has undoubted value for its contribution to the analysis of the reception of plastic artists in the period in which women began to make their way into the art system. This work analyzes the construction and meanings behind the archetype of the female painter in the particular case of the magazine Blanco y Negro (1891-1936), which was a pioneer in the modernization of the illustrated press in Spain as well as emblematic for its covers and artistic pages, made by the most recognized artists and cartoonists of the time. La representación de las artistas mujeres en la prensa gráfica española del primer tercio del siglo XX es un campo de investigación apenas abordado, que posee un indudable valor por su contribución al análisis de la recepción las artistas plásticas en el período en que las mujeres empiezan a introducirse en el sistema del arte. Este trabajo analiza la construcción y significados del arquetipo de mujer pintora en el caso particular de la revista Blanco y Negro (1891-1936), que fue pionera en la modernización de la prensa ilustrada en España y, a su vez, emblemática por sus portadas y páginas artísticas, realizadas por los artistas y dibujantes más reconocidos en la época.

Исследование посвящено творческо-педагогической биографии красноярского живописца Дмитрия Иннокентьевича Каратанова, деятельность которого была направлена на становление художественного образования столицы Енисейской губернии, позже Красноярского края. Все этапы этого процесса, включающие организацию первых рисовальных классов М.А. Рутченко (1891–1985), школы живописи А.С. Шестакова (1905–1907), художественной школы (1910–1919; 1936–1941; 1946 по сегодняшний день), связаны с именем пейзажиста Каратанова. Данная тема осмысляется в контексте культурных и историко-политических событий, потрясавших Россию в XIX–XX веках. В исследовании использован метод исторической реконструкции, позволивший заполнить фактологические лакуны новыми сведениями и сделать объективный вывод об уникальной роли Каратанова в творческих процессах Красноярска. The purpose of this study is to reconstruct the creative and pedagogical biography of the Krasnoyarsk painter Dmitry Karatanov, aimed at establishing art education in the capital of the Yenisei province, later the Krasnoyarsk Krai. All stages of this process are associated with the name of the landscape painter Karatanov, including the organization of the first drawing classes of M.A. Rutchenko (1891–1985), painting school of A.S. Shestakov (1905–1907), art school (1910–1919; 1936–1941; 1946 to date). This topic is comprehended in the context of cultural, historical and political events that shook Russia in the 19th–20th centuries. The study used the method of historical reconstruction, as a result, the author filled in the factual gaps with new information and made an objective conclusion about the unique role of D.I. Karatanov in the creative processes of Krasnoyarsk.

"Les biologistes roumains notables suivants, classés par année de naissance, ont subi des préjudices physiques et/ou moraux majeurs tels que l'interdiction d'exercer leur profession, la privation des droits civils, l'internement dans des prisons ou des colonies de travail, la peine pouvant aller jusqu'à la mort, l'émigration, souvent sans précision accusations ou tout jugement de tri ; leur ""crime"" était d'avoir une attitude, un comportement et des croyances anticommunistes explicites ou implicates: Alexandru Borza (1887-1971) Constantin Motăş (1891-1980) Ioan Gh. Botez (1892-1953) Teodor Buşniţă (1900-1977) Constantin S. Antonescu (1902-1981) Zaharia Popovici (1907- ? ) Victor Angelescu (1912-2002) Petre M. Bănărescu (1921-2009) Nicolae Al. Boşcaiu (1925-2009) Radu Racottă (1930) Denis Buican (1934) Ştefan Racoviţă (1936)."

El presente artículo aborda la situación de la prostitución femenina reglamentada, las concepciones sobre ella y el control de su ejercicio por parte de las autoridades estatales de la localidad bonaerense de Junín. Se analiza en función de su relación con el modelo de familia patriarcal que distintos sectores intentaron imponer en el país entre finales del siglo XIX y principios del XX. En este período adquirió una serie de rasgos específicos y una marcada relevancia debido a la dimensión y las características del desarrollo atravesado por el país y, particularmente, la localidad. Por una serie de concepciones fuertemente arraigadas en la época se concebía como una actividad fundamental para el mantenimiento de un orden social y de género específicos, pero que a su vez encarnaba algunos peligros. Por ello se optó por regularla a través de los municipios centrándose principalmente en aspectos morales, higiénicos y de seguridad.

The article examines the ideas and concepts of the cyclic development of human thought and history, which were developed by Russian thinkers in their works in the second half of the 19th and early 20th centuries. The author shows that in the said period of domestic thought development the cyclic worldview spread in the most important spheres of humanitarian knowledge: philosophy and political teachings (B.N. Chicherin, 1826–1904), social theory and sociology (N.Ya. Danilevsky, 1822–1885) and K.N. Leontiev, 1831–1891), and finally, the theory of cycles (waves) in world socio-economic dynamics (N.D. Kondratyev, 1892–1938). Thus, Russian thinkers laid the conceptual foundations of the original cyclic paradigm of social dynamics, which later were further developed by a number of Western scientists (O. Spengler, 1880–1936; A.J. Toynbee, 1889–1975, etc.).

Las estéticas del siglo XX han sido muchas y entre ellas hay una estética neotomista. El propósito de este trabajo es rastrear las ideas estéticas de algunos filósofos tomistas dominicos, probablemente los más conocidos del viejo mundo: Ceferino González y Díaz Tuñón O.P. (1831-1894); Heinrich Seuse Denifle O.P. (1844-1905); Norberto del Prado O.P. (1852-1918); Pedro Mandonnet O.P. (1858-1936); Ambrosio Gardeil O.P. (1859-1931); Antonin-Dalmace Sertillanges O.P. (1863- 1948); Gallus Manser O.P. (1866-1950); Édouard [Florentin-Louis] Hugon O.P. (1867-1929); Francisco Marín-Sola O.P. (1873-1932); Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange O.P. (1877-1964); Manuel Barbado O.P. (1884-1945); Santiago María Ramírez Ruíz de Dulanto O.P. (1891-1967); Abelardo Lobato O.P. (1925-2012); Sixto Castro (1970). Todos ellos han tenido amplio reconocimiento. No en todos los casos se ha conseguido hacer hallazgos en orden a la belleza y el arte.

Досліджено стиглі та перестиглі дубові насадження в Поліссі та Лісостепу, які ростуть в умовах свіжого сугруду та свіжого груду. Встановлено кліматичні чинники, які впливають на радіальний приріст дуба звичайного (Quercus robur L.) в Поліссі та Лісостепу і порівняно його реакції на зміни клімату в обох природних зонах. Виявлено реперні роки максимального (1891, 1902, 1924, 1931, 1957,1971, 1987) та мінімального (1895, 1906, 1918, 1922, 1929, 1936, 1950, 1976, 1992, 2000, 2005) радіального приросту дуба звичайного для Полісся, а також позитивні (1971, 1978, 1987) та негативні (1918, 1922, 1929, 1936, 1950, 1976, 1992, 2000, 2005 реперні роки для Лісостепу. Негативні реперні роки характеризуються дефіцитом опадів, посухами вегетаційного періоду, холодними або занадто теплими зимовими та ранньовесняними періодами, а позитивні –. сприятливим для росту дерев співвідношенням тепла і вологи. Для першого періоду (1960-1988 рр.) виявлено позитивний вплив зимових та ранньовесняних температур на радіальний приріст дуба у Поліссі і Лісостепу. У другому періоді (1989-2013 рр.) відбувся протилежний сценарій – значне підвищення зимових та ранньовесняних температур призвело до зменшення радіального приросту. У другому періоді дубові насадження в Поліссі більше потерпали від теплих зим, ніж насадження в Лісостепу. Негативний вплив посух вегетаційного періоду на приріст посилився у другому періоді для обох насаджень. Упродовж другого періоду опади суттєво втратили позитивний вплив на приріст у насадженнях як Полісся, так і Лісостепу. Підтверджено гіпотезу щодо посилення чутливості реакції радіального приросту дуба звичайного до змін клімату в Поліссі та Лісостепу.

The Asian genus Glyptopetalum Thwaites (1856: 267) comprises 35 species (Savinov 2014) of which 5 species are occurring in India (Ramamurthy 2000). Glyptopetalum griffithii Prain (1891: 209) was described on the basis of a single gathering obtained by Griffith from the Mishmi hills, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Later, Kanjilal et al. (1936: 266) recognized and treated this species based on a collection by Kanjilal from Pashighat in Arunachal Pradesh. Eventually Ramamurthy (2000: 112) also accepted the species in his treatment of the family Celastraceae for the Flora of India. Chakrabarty & Gangopadhyay (1990: 129) as well as Savinov (2014: 187) erroneously considered G. griffithii a name based on Euonymus griffithii Kurz (1870: 73). However, the latter was proposed as a new name for Hippocratea angulata Griffith (1854: 473), due to the existence of Euonymus angulata Wight (1846: t. 1053), whereas G. griffithii was originally described as species new to science.

O presente trabalho traçou como proposta um ensino dialógico de literatura na educaçãobásica, com fundamentação nos pressupostos teórico-metodológicos de Mikhail Bakhtin (1895-1975), Valentin N. Volóchinov (1895-1936) e Pável N. Medviédev (1891-1938), integrantes doCírculo de Bakhtin. Esta proposta viabiliza a que professores da educação básica repensem suaspráticas de ensino, (re)acentuando metodologias cujo prisma seja a interação. Nosso objetivo, portanto,é propor um ensino dialógico de literatura para a formação de sujeitos críticos, a partir doinstante em que as condições sócio-históricas e interdiscursivas são levadas em conta, assim comoas vozes que atravessam cada gênero literário ou discursivo estudado. Quanto ao ato analítico,delimitou-se como corpus o poema “José”, de Carlos Drummond de Andrade, que foi publicadooriginalmente em 1942, e cuja edição que utilizamos é a de 2009. Espera-se que, enquanto sujeitosresponsivos e ativos, pesquisadores e docentes mobilizem estratégias de saber relacionadas ao sujeito,à linguagem, à história e à ideologia, termos caros à compreensão de textos literários.Palavras-chave: Ensino. Literatura. Dialogismo.

O “Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem” (1929) de Valentin Volóchinov se destaca como uma das mais altas expressões da vida intelectual dos primeiros anos da Rússia pós-revolucionária. Começando com uma discussão relativa às fundações epistemológicas da obra, este artigo pretende trazer à luz as contribuições seminais de Volóchinov para uma semiótica social marxista, estudando os signos ideológicos como campos de luta entre acentuações sociais realizadas por vários grupos e classes sociais. Sublinhando as fortes afinidades eletivas tanto com a psicologia histórico-cultural de Vygotsky (1896-1934) quanto com o pensamento político de Gramsci (1891-1937), argumenta-se então que o método sociológico na ciência da linguagem de Volóchinov (1895-1936) propicia o fundamento para uma abordagem bastante frutífera da dimensão ideológica das relações sociais. Ao fazê-lo, ele lança uma luz dinâmica sobre o lado político das interações de linguagem concretas, como contribuição original para a expansão do programa de pesquisa marxista.

Resumo O artigo analisa Notice de géographie médicale: quelques observations sur les maladies des indigènes des provinces de Lourenço Marques et de Gaza, escrito por Georges-Louis Liengme (1859-1936), reconstituindo a confluência entre a medicina como prática social e o paradigma civilizatório que o levou a viajar para o sul do atual território de Moçambique no ano de 1891. Dominando a gramática clínica apoiada no poder de intervenção e de controle diretos sobre o indivíduo, Liengme buscou decodificar o universo africano pelo signo da doença e sob a perspectiva de corpos particularmente enfermos, à espera da ação de governos e sociedades missionárias. Para intervir nesse mundo em desordem, de loucuras e de cegueiras, o seu olhar se voltou para os referentes capazes de produzir “conexões de sentido” e “convergência de horizontes simbólicos” com as populações, mas, nesse processo, avançou em direção a uma liminaridade que acabou por subverter o sentido de sua própria presença.

The genus Nephelomilta Hampson, 1900 is revised. The genus Kailasha Singh & Kirti, 2015 is synonymized with Nephelomilta. Twelve new species, N. admiranda, sp. nov. (NE India), N. kanchenjunga, sp. nov. (NE India), N. wolfgangspeideli, sp. nov. (S Vietnam), N. ranau, sp. nov. (Sumatra), N. bana, sp. nov. (C Vietnam), N. martini, sp. nov. (N Vietnam), N. thomaswitti, sp. nov. (Nepal, NE India), N. fangae, sp. nov. (China: Hainan), N. hortensis, sp. nov. (N Thailand), N. melli, sp. nov. (E and S China), N. ferruginea, sp. nov. (Sumatra) and N. diehli, sp. nov. (Sumatra), and two new subspecies, N. sumatrana effractoida, ssp. nov. (N India and Indochina) and N. hortensis fansipana, ssp. nov. (N Vietnam) are described. Barsine fuscobarsine, 2016 is synonymized with Nephelomilta suffusa (Hampson, 1891). Eleven new combinations are established and three taxa previously treated as junior synonyms of N. effracta are upgraded to species level: N. taprobana (Hampson, 1901), comb. nov., N. sumatrana (van Eecke, 1927), comb. & stat. nov., N. gulmargensis (N. Singh, Kirti & D.P. Singh, 2015), comb. nov., N. effracta (Walker, 1854), comb. nov., N. pseudoeffracta (Kirti, Joshi & N. Singh, 2013), comb. nov., N. klapperichi (Daniel, 1952), comb. nov., N. pellucida (Rothschild, 1936), comb. nov., N. babensis (Bae & Bayarsaikhan, 2017), comb. nov., N. karenkonis (Matsumura, 1930), comb. & stat. nov., N. angkorensis (Bayarsaikhan & Bae, 2016), comb. nov., N. pusilla (Wileman, 1910), comb. & stat. nov. Lectotypes for Chionaema effracta sumatrana van Eecke, 1927, Chionaema pellucida Rothschild, 1936 and Chionaema pusilla Wileman, 1910 are designated.

Artykuł ten, zatytułowany ^ „Działalność misyjna polskich salezjanów w Chinach w Filipinę”, w pierwszej części przywołuje prehistorię (sny Dùn-Bosco z Azji) i historię Misje salezjańskie w Chinach i na Filipinach. Dlaczego akurat te dwa kraje? Dlaczego salezjanie są wydaleni z dala od Chin przez komunistów w 1950 r. kontynuowali dzieło salezjańskie na Filipinach. Tam druga część przypomina polskich salezjanów, którzy pracowali w tych dwóch krajach, wyrażając swoją opinię małe biografie: sac. Teodor Wieczorek (1888-1957; w Chinach 1921-1957), rozdz. Franciszek Pyka (1891-1930; w Chinach 1924-1927), ks. Dr Jan Siara (1887-1937; w Chinach 1925-1932), co. styczeń Urban (1891-1953; w Chinach 1P26-1931), ks. Jan Buchta (1906-1972; w Chinach 1929-1954, a następnie po filipińsku), sac. Wiktor Spinek (1900-1978; w Chinach 1929-1932), sac. Władysława Wieczorka (1903-1942; w Chinach 1929-1932), co. Antoni Wróbel (*1908; w Chinach 1934-1938), ks Marian Mielczarek (1907-1951; w Chinach 1936-1951), o. Tomasz Szeliga (*1915; w Chinach 1936-1972), współ. Paweł Prokopowicz (1910-1983; w Chinach 1937-1957, na Filipinach 1957-1972), sac. Feliksa Głowicki (*1931; w Chinach 1957, a następnie na Filipinach), rozdz. Arkadiusz Mikucki (*1970, w filipiński 1993-1994). W trzeciej części przyjrzymy się zasługom polskich misjonarzy w Chiny i Filipiny: ks. Wieczorek przez 23 lata jako ekonom prowincji chińskiej, przez 3 lata dyrektor szkoły św. Ludwika i proboszcz parafii św. Antoniego w Hong przez 17 lat, budowniczy m.in seminarium, kościoła św. Antoniego w Hongkongu i innych domów salezjańskich. Don Siara był za Przez 3 lata był wikariuszem biskupa Makau w dystrykcie Heung Shan, następnie pierwszym dyrektorem seminarium W Hong Kongu. Don Buchta był pierwszym dyrektorem Yuet Wah w Makau, a następnie dyrektorem różnych Salezjanin pracuje na Filipinach, radny prowincjalny. Don Mielczarek, inteligentny prefekt w Makau a następnie w Hongkongu (w czasie wojny) był dyrektorem Instytutu św. Józefa w Szanghaju. Don Szeliga w czasie wojny pracował niestrudzenie i nieustraszenie w wikariacie Shiu Chow, gdzie pozostał do 1953 r. Następnie był administratorem w różnych domach salezjańskich w Hongkongu. .Teraz działa w Kanada. Co. Prokopowicz pracował w Chinach, a następnie na Filipinach w administracji i jako szef różnych robotników. Uczył Fingiese, znał hiszpański, chiński, telugu, rosyjski, włoski. A inteligentna i nieoceniona pomoc dyrektorów i prefektów dzieł salezjańskich. Don Głowicki pracował przez pewien czas w Chinach, a po święceniach kapłańskich na Filipinach jako dyrektor a następnie administrator w różnych domach salezjańskich Dzieło salezjańskie kwitnie na Filipinach. kielich misyjnej krwi i potu (marzenie Ks. Bosko) w Chinach nie jest jeszcze wypełnione wyd chińscy salezjanie z nadzieją czekają na dzień, w którym ponownie wkroczą do Chin kontynentalny.

Volodymyr Kulchytsky’s Studies on Tramway Horse Diseases in Lviv in 1891–1905 Volodymyr Kulchytsky (Włodzimierz Kulczycki, 1852–1936) was a veterinarian, zoologist, prominent mammal anatomist, professor, pro-rector and rector of the Academy of Veterinary Medicine in Lviv. From 1882 to 1934 he worked at the Lviv Academy of Veterinary Medicine, first as an assistant, then as a lecturer, and from 1906 as a professor, head of the Department of Descriptive Anatomy, Topography, Histology and Embryology (later, after changes, the Department of Comparative Anatomy). He also worked as a veterinarian at the Lviv Horse Tram Society, as a city veterinarian and as a veterinarian for controlling cattle and meat on the Lviv railroads. Kulchytsky’s scientific output comprises about 60 publications (brief research papers, studies and scientific articles, discussions, reviews, etc.) on topics ranging from zoology, mammal anatomy, and parasites of oriental carpets. A completely unknown part of Kulchytsky’s scientific biography was the hippiatric research conducted on the morbidity of locomotive transport animals. The statistics he compiled included, first and foremost, a list of diseases of tramway horses, taking into account pathological conditions directly related to the type of work performed. The documentation makes it possible to indicate the relationship between the work performed (norms and dimension of work), the city’s topography, the construction of the tramway infrastructure, and the morbidity of streetcar horses.

Agustina González López, “la zapatera”, es una escritora, pintora y política granadina casi desconocida cuya obra literaria aún no se ha analizado ni se ha puesto en valor. Este artículo se adentrará en la retórica y las estrategias empleadas por la autora en su obra Justificación (1928) para salvaguardar su dignidad. El objetivo es abordar, desde la ginocrítica y los estudios literarios, la escritura de esta enigmática mujer. Los resultados del análisis evidencian, por una parte, cómo acusar de anormales y locas a las mujeres fue el mecanismo para desautorizar a las que incumplieron las normas sociales y, por otra, la capacidad de la escritora para desmantelar estos discursos. De esta forma, se pretende demostrar que la escritura sirvió para entender cómo eran percibidas las mujeres por su sociedad y, a la vez, para buscar su propia identidad al margen de los roles y patrones establecidos.

Universiti Brunei DarussalamBetween 10 to 20 per cent of all the Tibeto-Burman-speaking Lahu people now subscribe to one or another version of the Christian religion.The largest proportion of present-day Lahu Christians inherited the genre of this Western religion propagated by American Baptist missionaries in the former Kengtung State of Burma (from 1901 to 1966), in Yunnan (from 1920 to 1949), and in North Thailand (from 1968 to 1990). For this reason, it is often thought that pioneer American Baptist among the Lahu, William Marcus Young (1861–1936), was the first to induct a representative of this people into the Christian faith.In fact this is not the case. The first Lahu Christians lived in North Thailand, baptised by long-time Chiang Mai-based American Presbyterian missionary, Daniel McGilvary. This was in 1891, thirteen years before Young’s first baptism of a Lahu in Kengtung, Burma, in October 1904.The paper addresses three questions. Why were Lahu living in upland North Thailand in the early 1890s? Why did one small Lahu community decide to embrace the Christian religion? Finally, why, in stark contrast to Baptist Christianity in the Lahu Mountains, did this fledgling Lahu Presbyterian community disappear, apparently without trace, sometime after 1920?

The Capsalinae Baird, 1853 (Monogenea: Capsalidae) is revised based on a thorough review of original descriptions and examination of type museum material, where available, to validate species. A total of 262 type and voucher specimens was studied representing apparently 42 of the 60 currently described capsaline species. A combination of characters that should be independent of variation due to specimen preparation techniques was chosen to discriminate species. These characters include the presence/absence of papillae on the ventral surface of the haptor, the presence/absence and the morphology of haptoral accessory sclerites and the presence/absence of dorsomarginal body sclerites and their morphology and distribution. We consider that only 36 of the 60 nominal capsaline species are valid. We could find no support for Caballerocotyla Price, 1960 and therefore we synonymise it with Capsala Bosc, 1811. Under the current concept we recognise 22 species of Capsala, 7 species of Capsaloides Price, 1938, 3 species of Nasicola Yamaguti, 1968 and 4 species of Tristoma Cuvier, 1817. The following Capsala species are considered valid: C. albsmithi (Dollfus, 1962) n. comb.; C. biparasitica (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938; C. caballeroi Winter, 1955; C. foliacea (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938; C. gouri Chauhan, 1951; C. gregalis (Wagner & Carter, 1967) n. comb.; C. interrupta (Monticelli, 1891) Johnston, 1929; C. katsuwoni (Ishii, 1936) Price, 1938; C. laevis (Verrill, 1875) Johnston, 1929; C. maccallumi Price, 1939; C. magronum (Ishii, 1936) Price, 1938; C. manteri Price, 1951; C. manteriaffinis (Mamaev, 1968) n. comb.; C. martinierei Bosc, 1811; C. notosinense (Mamaev, 1968) n. comb.; C. nozawae (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938; C. onchidiocotyle (Setti, 1899) Johnston, 1929; C. ovalis (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938; C. paucispinosa (Mamaev, 1968) n. comb.; C. pelamydis (Taschenberg, 1878) Price, 1938; C. poeyi (Pérez-Vigueras, 1935) Price, 1938; C. pricei Hildago-Escalente, 1950. We consider the following Capsaloides species valid: C. cornutus (Verrill, 1875) Price, 1938; C. cristatus Yamaguti, 1968; C. hoffmannae Lamothe-Argumedo, 1996; C. magnaspinosus Price, 1939; C. nairagi Yamaguti, 1968; C. perugiai (Setti, 1898) Price, 1938; C. sinuatus (Goto, 1894) Price, 1938. The following Nasicola species are deemed valid: N. brasiliensis Kohn, Baptista-Farias, Santos & Gibson, 2004; N. hogansi Wheeler & Beverley-Burton, 1987; N. klawei Stunkard, 1962. Presently, we consider the following Tristoma species valid: T. adcoccineum Yamaguti, 1968; T. adintegrum Yamaguti, 1968; T. coccineum Cuvier, 1817; T. integrum Diesing, 1850. A list of new and re-established synonyms is provided. The status of each species is discussed in detail and a key to all capsaline species that we consider valid is presented. The following 5 capsaline species are considered to be species inquirendae: Caballerocotyla phillippina Velasquez, 1982; Capsala megacotyle (Linstow, 1906) Johnston, 1929; Tristoma fuhrmanni Guiart, 1938; T. levinsenii Monticelli, 1891; T. uncinatum Monticelli, 1889. The importance of careful character selection to discriminate between capsaline species and the need for studies of live parasites to obtain additional characters based on reproductive structures is addressed. Hostspecificity in the Capsalinae is also discussed.

The genus Sitticus Simon, 1901 sensu lato is revised and split into new genera Sittiab gen. n., Sittiflor gen. n., Sittilong gen. n., Sittisax gen. n., which join existing already Attulus Simon, 1889 sensu novo, Jollas Simon, 1901, Sitticus Simon, 1901 sensu stricto, and Sittipub Prószyński, 2016, based on interpretation of taxonomic data from a number of publications of the Author, on the background of world's literature synthesized in Prószyński (2016a, b) available at http://www.peckhamia.com/salticidae/Subfamilies/, and http://www.peckhamia.com/salticidae/.The following new synonyms and combinations are established, or clarified. Attus viduus Kulczyński, 1895 (removed from synonymy of A. distinguendus) = Attulus avocator (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885) comb. n., Jollas armatus (Bryant, 1943) = "Oningis" armatus Bryant, 1943b - retransfer of misplaced species, belonging to EUOPHRYINES, Jollas crassus (Bryant, 1943) = "Oningis" crassus Bryant, 1943 - retransfer of misplaced species, belonging to EUOPHRYINES, Jollas lahorensis (Dyal, 1935) (nomen dubium) = "Oningis" lahorensis Dyal, 1935 - unrecognizable species, should be listed as nomen dubium in its original combination, Sitticus absolutus (Gertsch, Mulaik, 1936) = Sittiab absolutus (Gertsch & Mulaik, 1936) comb. n., Sitticus ammophilus (Thorell, 1875) = Attulus ammophilus (Thorell, 1875) comb. n., Sitticus ansobicus Andreeva, 1976 = Attulus ansobicus (Andreeva, 1976) comb. n., Sitticus atricapillus (Simon, 1882) = Sittiflor atricapillus (Simon, 1882) comb. n., Sitticus avocator (Pickard-Cambridge O., 1885) = Attulus avocator (Pickard-Cambridge O., 1885) comb. n., Sitticus burjaticus Danilov & Logunov, 1993 = Attulus burjaticus (Danilov & Logunov, 1993) comb. n., Sitticus caricis (Westring, 1861) = Sittiflor caricis (Westring, 1861) comb. n., Sitticus clavator Schenkel, 1936 = Attulus clavator (Schenkel, 1936) comb. n., Sitticus concolor: Maddison, 1996 (nomen dubium) = Sittiab cursor (Barrows, 1919) comb. n., Sitticus cursor (Barrows, 1919) = Sittiab cursor (Barrows, 1919) comb. n., Sitticus cutleri Prószynski, 1980 = Sittiflor cutleri (Prószynski, 1980) comb. n., Sitticus damini (Chyzer & Kulczynski, 1891) = Attulus damini (Chyzer & Kulczynski, 1891) comb. n., Sitticus distinguendus (Simon, 1868) = Attulus distinguendus (Simon, 1868) comb. n., Sitticus dorsatus: Richman, 1979 (nomen dubium) = Sittiab absolutus Gertsch & Mulaik, 1936 comb. n., Sitticus dubatolovi Logunov & Rakov, 1998 = Attulus dubatolovi (Logunov & Rakov, 1998) comb. n., Sitticus dudkoi Logunov, 1998 = Sittiflor dudkoi (Logunov, 1998) comb. n., Sitticus dzieduszyckii (L. Koch, 1870) = Sittisax dzieduszyckii (L. Koch, 1870) comb. n., Sitticus floricola (Koch C.L., 1837) = Sittiflor floricola (Koch C.L., 1837) comb. n., Sitticus floricola palustris (Peckham & Peckham, 1883) = Sittiflor floricola palustris (Peckham & Peckham, 1883) comb. n., Sitticus goricus Ovtsharenko, 1978 = Attulus goricus (Ovtsharenko, 1978) comb. n., Sitticus inopinabilis Logunov, 1992 = Attulus inopinabilis (Logunov, 1992) comb. n., Sitticus inexpectus Logunov, Kronestedt, 1997 = Sittiflor inexpectus (Logunov, Kronestedt, 1997) comb. n., Sitticus juniperi Gertsch & Riechert, 1976 = Sittiab juniperi (Gertsch & Riechert, 1976) comb. n., Sitticus karakumensis Logunov, 1992 = Attulus karakumensis (Logunov, 1992) comb. n., Sitticus kazakhstanicus Logunov, 1992 = Attulus kazakhstanicus (Logunov, 1992) comb. n., Sitticus longipes (Canestrini, 1873) = Sittilong longipes (Canestrini, 1873) comb. n., Sitticus magnus Chamberlin, Ivie, 1944 = Sittiflor magnus (Chamberlin, Ivie, 1944) comb. n., Sitticus mirandus Logunov, 1993 =Attulus mirandus (Logunov, 1993) comb. n., Sitticus monstrabilis Logunov, 1992 = Sittiflor monstrabilis (Logunov, 1992), Sitticus nenilini Wesolowska, Logunov, 1993 = Attulus nenilini (Wesolowska, Logunov, 1993) comb. n., Sitticus niveosignatus (Simon, 1880) = Attulus niveosignatus (Simon, 1880) comb. n., Sitticus penicillatus (Simon, 1875) = Attulus penicillatus (Simon, 1875) comb. n., Sitticus penicilloides Wesolowska, 1981 =Attulus penicilloides (Wesolowska, 1981) comb. n., Sitticus pulchellus Logunov, 1992 = Sittiflor pulchellus (Logunov, 1992) comb. n., Sitticus ranieri (Peckham & Peckham, 1909) = Sittisax ranieri (Peckham & Peckham, 1909), Sitticus rivalis Simon, 1937 = Sittiflor striatus (Emerton, 1911) - reinstated synonym, contra Logunov, 2004 a: 35, Sitticus rupicola (Koch C.L., 1837) = Sittiflor rupicola (Koch C.L., 1837) comb. n., Sitticus saltator (Simon, 1868) = Attulus saltator (Simon, 1868) comb. n., Sitticus saxicola (C. L. Koch, 1846) = Sittisax saxicola (C. L. Koch, 1846) comb. n., Sitticus sinensis Schenkel, 1963 = Attulus sinensis (Schenkel, 1963) comb. n., Sitticus striatus Emerton, 1911 = Sittiflor striatus (Emerton, 1911) comb. n., Sitticus talgarensis Logunov & Wesolowska, 1993 = Attulus talgarensis (Logunov & Wesolowska, 1993) comb. n., Sitticus vilis (Kulczynski, 1895) =Attulus vilis (Kulczynski, 1895) comb. n., Sitticus zaisanicus Logunov, 1998 = Attulus zaisanicus (Logunov, 1998) comb. n., Sitticus zimmermanni (Simon, 1877) = Sittiflor zimmermanni (Simon, 1877).South American groups of species Sitticus leucoproctus and Sitticus palpalis are left temporarily within genus Sitticus pending further research. Pseudattulus kratochvili Caporiacco, 1955 (female only) = Sitticus cabellensis Prószyński, 1971 comb. reinstated = Sittisax cabellensis (Prószyński, 1971) comb. n.Referring to previous paper by Prószyński (2016c) I correct species synonym Myrmavola globosa (Wanless, 1978) = Toxeus globosus (Wanless, 1978), being a typing error.Also, I reconfirm hereby original genus placement of Emertonius exasperans Peckham & Peckham, 1892, as seconded by Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2010: 164-167, figs 169-171 and documented at: http://www.peckhamia.com/salticidae/q24-Emer.html, dismissed by the World Spider Catalog, ver. 2016 with incompetent comment.Misplacement in Sitticus s.l. detected: Sitticus taiwanensis Peng X. & Li S., 2002, Sitticus wuae Peng X. & Tso I., Li S., 2002 – correction pending further research.

A Votorantim, um dos principais grupos empresariais atuando na economia brasileira, tem sua origem que remonta ao ano de 1891, quando o banco União de São Paulo criou a Fábrica Têxtil Votorantim no município paulista de Sorocaba. Com a falência do banco União em 1917, a empresa foi leiloada e, nos anos subsequentes, seu controle acionário foi adquirido pelo português Antonio Pereira Ignácio, um importante industrial do setor têxtil paulista e que fez da Votorantim a principal firma do ramo têxtil algodoeiro de São Paulo nas décadas de 1920 e 1930. Todavia, a partir dos anos 1930, o Grupo Votorantim passou a concentrar esforços no setor de bens intermediários – cimento, produtos químicos, alumínio, aço e ferro – através da constituição das seguintes empresas: Fábrica de Cimento Santa Helena (1936), Siderúrgica Barra Mansa (1937), Cia. Nitro-Química (1937) e a Cia. Brasileira de Alumínio (1955). Tendo em vista a escassez de análises sobre como teria se dado a conversão do Grupo Votorantim do setor de bens de consumo finais à indústria de base, o artigo aborda esta guinada realçando: a correlação entre o Grupo e o projeto industrializante do presidente Getúlio Vargas, os recursos produtivos preexistentes e a expertise industrial de seus dirigentes. A pesquisa calca-se em documentação primária constituída de: relatórios da diretoria do Grupo Votorantim, demonstrações de lucros e perdas e balanços patrimoniais. Como resultado, o artigo traz uma contribuição ao debate sobre a formação de grupos econômicos em economias periféricas, ao demonstrar que, no caso da Votorantim, a geração de receitas pelo próprio Grupo foi o instrumento principal de financiamento à criação das novas empresas no setor de bens intermediários do Brasil.

Indian taxa of the genus Cyana Walker, 1854 are reviewed. Five new species and three new subspecies are described: C. rudloffi Volynkin & N. Singh, sp. nov., C. atlanteia N. Singh et al., sp. nov., C. chrysopeleia N. Singh et al., sp. nov., C. dohertyi eirene Volynkin & N. Singh, ssp. nov., C. britomartis N. Singh & Volynkin, sp. nov., C. arama metis Volynkin & N. Singh, ssp. nov., C. dryope Volynkin & N. Singh, sp. nov. and C. conclusa nicobara N. Singh et al., ssp. nov. The replacement name for C. tripunctata Rothschild, 1936 nec. Reich, 1935 is introduced: C. arorai Volynkin et al., nom. nov. Cyana linatula (Swinhoe, 1891), stat. rev. and Cyana watsoni Hampson, 1897, stat. rev. are restored to species rank from the synonymy with Cyana subornata (Walker, 1854) and Cyana moelleri (Elwes, 1890), respectively. Cyana paeninsulana Černý, 2009 is downgraded to a subspecies of C. selangorica (Hampson, 1903): C. selangorica paeninsulana Černý, 2009, stat. nov. Cyana flavotincta (Draudt, 1914) is downgraded to a subspecies of C. coccinea (Moore, 1878): Cyana coccinea flavotincta (Draudt, 1914), stat. nov. Five new synonyms are established: C. detrita Walker, 1854 = Lyclene tripunctata Reich, 1935, syn. nov.; C. obliquilineata (Hampson, 1900) = Cyana baolini Fang, 1992, syn. nov.; C. gelida gelida (Walker, 1854) = Lithosia alborosea Walker, 1864, syn. nov.; C. khasiana Hampson, 1897 = Chionaema hampsoni Kaleka, 2003, syn. nov.; C. arama arama (Moore, 1859) = Bizone triguttata Walker, 1869, syn. nov. The lectotypes are designated for the following 30 taxa: Cyana detrita Walker, 1854, Barsine suffundens Walker, 1864 [1865], Bizone coccinea Moore, 1878, Chionaema coccinea form flavotincta Draudt, 1914, Bizone puer Elwes, 1890, Bizone linatula Swinhoe, 1891, Cyana dudgeoni Hampson, 1895, Bizone peregrina Walker, 1854, Cyana catorhoda Hampson, 1897, Bizone quadrinotata Walker, 1869, Bizone pallens Butler, 1877, Bizone amabilis Moore, 1877, Bizone harterti Elwes, 1890, Doliche gelida Walker, 1854, Lithosia alborosea Walker, 1864, Bizone mölleri Elwes, 1890, Cyana watsoni Hampson, 1897, Bizone gazella Moore, 1872, Bizone dohertyi Elwes, 1890, Bizone sikkimensis Elwes, 1890, Cyana khasiana Hampson, 1897, Bizone bellissima Moore, 1878, Bizone arama Moore, 1859, Bizone triguttata Walker, 1869, Bizone adita Moore, 1859, Bizone bifasciata Poujade, 1886, Bizone signa Walker, 1854, Bizone fasciculata Walker, 1856, Bizone perornata Walker, 1854 and Bizone conclusa Walker, 1862.

The results of studying long-term (lasting 10-15 years or more) phases of decreased and increased conditionally natural annual and seasonal runoff of the Don River near the village of Razdorskaya and the Lena River near the village of Kyusyur are considered. The retrieval of long-term water flow time series (excluding the changes that are caused by anthropogenic impacts from the observed water flow) is based on the transformation of the annual hydrograph of average daily water flow using the Kalinin-Milyukov method. The long-term phases of annual and seasonal runoff have been identified on the basis of cumulative deviation curves and criteria for statistical homogeneity of time series by their averages. For the entire period of observations on the Don (1891-2019) and the Lena (1936-2019), two cardinally different types of long-term dynamics for contrasting phases of annual and seasonal runoff that are characteristic of these rivers and common in most of Russia have been revealed. On the Lena, the phases of decreased and increased values of annual and seasonal runoff have changed quasisynchronously, whereas on the Don, the phases of annual runoff and snow melt flood runoff on the one hand and summer-autumn and winter runoff on the other hand have changed asynchronously. The main characteristics of the contrast phases have been determined.

As a part of an ongoing project in order to inventory the helminth parasites of rodents in Mexico, 49 individuals of Syphacia (Seuratoxyuris) peromysci were collected from five specimens of the Rock Mouse Peromyscus difficilis caught in Veracruz state, Mexico. This is the first report of S. peromysci in a Mexican endemic rodent, widening the known distribution of the species to the southern portion of the country.

Victor Cădere (born 1891) was a Romanian lawyer, civil servant, diplomat and politician. He participated as an officer in the war with Bulgaria (1913) and in the I-st World War (1916–1918). Then he was at the peace conference in Paris as part of the Romanian delegation. In the years 1919–1921 he was dealing with the repatriation of Romanians from the USA and Russia. After returning to the country, in 1925, he began an academic career, which he continued with interruptions until his death in France in 1981. At that time, he was an activist of the peasant party and a member of the Chamber of Deputies. In the years 1930–1932 he held high official positions in the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of the Interior. In 1932, he began his career as a diplomat. His first post was Warsaw, where he was to watch over the matters of the Romanian-Polish alliance securing both countries against the threat from the USSR. Before he actually took office, however, he became the Romanian negotiator on the non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union, but risked Nicolae Titulescu – an influential diplomat and politician who opposed them and soon became Cădere’s superior, i.e. the minister of foreign affairs. After settling in Warsaw, the new MP tried to work for the development of the alliance. However, he encountered obstacles on the part of Titulescu, who wanted to loosen his ties with the Republic of Poland and bring him closer to Moscow. This affected the fate of Cădere, who was dismissed in July 1935. His diplomatic career slowed down. He took up another post – in Belgrade – only after the fall of Titulescu in 1936, then he was a member of parliament in Lisbon (1941–1944). From 1945 to 1967 he stayed in Romania. In the years 1952- 1956 he was imprisoned by the communist authorities. In 1967 he remained in exile in France.

Forty species of the genus Oides Weber, 1801 are considered as valid in the Palaearctic and Oriental regions. Six new species are described: O. bezdeki sp. nov., O. hsui sp. nov., O. takizawai sp. nov., and O. wangi sp. nov. from Sulawesi (Indonesia); O. boreri sp. nov. from Laos; and O. geiseri sp. nov. from India, Nepal, and Myanmar. The following synonymies are proposed: O. maculicollis Jacoby, 1886 as a junior synonym of O. apicalis Jacoby, 1883; O. niasensis Bowditch, 1925 as a junior synonym of O. duodecimpunctata (Clark, 1865); A. sumatrensis Blanchard, 1853, A. philippinensis Boheman, 1859, O. flavipes Duvivier, 1884, O. abdominalis Duvivier, 1884, O. subtilissima Duvivier, 1884, O. flavida Duvivier, 1884, O. elliptica Duvivier, 1884, O. marcida Duvivier, 1884, O. rhabodscelis Weise, 1922, O. bakeri Laboissière, 1925, and O. ovalis Laboissière, 1925 as junior synonyms of O. flava (Olivier, 1807); O. bengalensis Maulik, 1936 as a junior synonym of O. innocua Gahan, 1891; O. violaceipennis Duvivier, 1884 as a junior synonym of O. metallica Jacoby, 1884; O. indosinensis Laboissière, 1927 as a junior synonym of O. palleata (Fabricius, 1801); O. sternalis Weise, 1913 as a junior synonym of O. quadriguttata Duvivier, 1884; O. gyironga Chen & Jaing, 1981 as a junior synonym of O. scutellata (Hope, 1830); O. indica Baly, 1879 and O. chinensis Weise, 1922 as junior synonyms of O. tarsata (Baly, 1865); O. tibialis Duvivier, 1884 as a junior synonym of O. vixilla Duvivier, 1884. Oides epipleuralis Laboissière is removed from synonymy with O. laticlava (Fairmaire, 1889); O. laticlava (Fairmaire, 1889) removed from synonymy with O. maculata (Olivier, 1807); O. thibettana Jacoby, 1900 and O. tibiella Wilcox, 1971 removed from synonymies with O. tarsata (Baly, 1865). Neotypes are designated for Adorium maculatum Olivier, 1807; A. subhemisphaericum Guérin-Méneville, 1830; A. diardi Guérin-Méneville, 1830; O. chinensis Weise, 1922; and O. leucomelaena Weise, 1922. Host plant information is provided when known.

Sergey Petrovich Fedorov was born in Moscow in 1869. In 1886 he graduated with honors from the gymnasium, and in 1891 - the medical faculty of Moscow University. In 1892, he was the first in Russia to manufacture and put into practice cholera and tetanus antitoxins, in 1893 - tetanus toxoid serum. In 1895, he defended his doctoral dissertation and was appointed as an assistant, and in 1896 - as a privat-docent of the faculty surgical clinic of Moscow University. In 1899 S.P. For the first time, Fedorov performed a single-step trans-vesicular prostatectomy, in 1901 a laparotomy for purulent peritonitis, in 1902 a gastrectomy with resection of the esophagus, resection of the colon. From 1903 to 1936, Sergei Petrovich headed the department of the hospital surgical clinic of the Military Medical Academy. In 1907, on his initiative, the Russian Urological Society was organized in Russia, the chairman of which he was elected (now bearing his name), the Urological Institute was established at the Military Medical Academy. In 1909 S.P. For the first time in the world, Fedorov performed the operation under intravenous hedonal anesthesia, which was the beginning of the widespread use of inhalation anesthesia. In 1909 he was awarded the title of honorary life-surgeon, and at the end of 1912 he was confirmed as a life-surgeon of the imperial family, which he combined with work in the Military Medical Academy. At this time, he wrote "Atlas of Cystoscopy and Rectoscopy" (1911), the monograph "Gallstones and surgery of the biliary tract" (1918). May 2, 1920 S.P. Fedorov was detained and put in prison. September 9, 1920, he was sentenced to a suspended five-year prison term. September 14, 1921 S.P. Fedorov was arrested again and at the end of November under escort sent to Moscow for a free settlement. In 1921 S.P. Fedorov took part in the creation of the first Soviet surgical journal "New Surgical Archive". From 1926 to 1933, he headed the Institute of Surgical Neuropathology (now the Leningrad Research Neurosurgical Institute named after A.L. Polenov, M3 of the RSFSR). S.P. Fedorov proposed new methods and modifications of operations on the nervous system, kidneys, intestines, biliary tract, new tools for their implementation. Under his leadership, the development of blood transfusion problems began for the first time in the USSR. He created the largest surgical school (N.N. Elansky, I.S. Kolesnikov, P.A. Kupriyanov, V.N. Shamov, etc.). In 1928, S. P. Fedorov was awarded the title of Honored Scientist of the RSFSR. In 1933, he was the first of the surgeons to be awarded the Order of Lenin.Died S.P. Fedorov in Leningrad in 1936 and was buried at the Communist site (now the Cossack cemetery) of the Alexander Nevsky Monastery. He has published over 120 scientific papers, including 11 manuals and monographs. Memorial plaque in memory of SP Fedorov installed on the building of the Faculty Surgery Clinic of the Military Medical Academy. CM. Kirov.

The genus Mesophleps Hübner (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is revised; 54 available names (including one unjustifiedemendation), one junior primary homonym and one unavailable name were considered; type material of 44 previouslydescribed nominal species was examined. Nine new species are described: M. acutunca sp. nov., M. bifidella sp. nov., M.unguella sp. nov., M. gigantella sp. nov., M. coffeae sp. nov., M. parvella sp. nov., M. aspina sp. nov., M. truncatella sp.nov. and M. undulatella sp. nov. Two possibly new species are discussed but not formally named for lack of material.Twenty-five new combinations are introduced: M. safranella (Legrand, 1965) comb. nov., M. epichorda (Turner, 1919)comb. nov., M. tabellata (Meyrick, 1913) comb. nov., M. crocina (Meyrick, 1904) comb. nov., M. ochracella (Turati,1926) comb. nov., M. geodes (Meyrick, 1929) comb. nov., M. catericta (Meyrick, 1927) comb. nov., M. tephrastis(Meyrick, 1904) comb. nov., M. cycnobathra (Lower, 1898) comb. nov., M. tetrachroa (Lower, 1898) comb. nov., M.ochroloma (Lower, 1901) comb. nov., M. trichombra (Lower, 1898) comb. nov., M. mylicotis (Meyrick, 1904) comb. nov.,M. macrosemus (Lower, 1900) comb. nov., M. apentheta (Turner, 1919) comb. nov., M. meliphanes (Lower, 1894) comb.nov., M. chloranthes (Lower, 1900) comb. nov., M. centrothetis (Meyrick, 1904) comb. nov., M. chloristis (Meyrick,1904) comb. nov., M. argonota (Lower, 1901) comb. nov., Megacraspedus arnaldi (Turati & Krüger, 1936) comb. nov.,Aponoea cinerellus (Turati, 1930) comb. nov., Pycnobathra acromelas (Turner, 1919) comb. nov., Sarotorna mesoleuca(Lower, 1900) comb. nov., S. dentata Meyrick, 1904, comb. nov. One species, Nothris mesophracta Turner, 1919, isremoved from Mesophleps but no current genus is available. Fourteen new synonymies (one genus, 13 species-group taxa)are established: Bucolarcha Meyrick, 1929, syn. nov. of Mesophleps Hübner, [1825]; Stiphrostola longinqua Meyrick,1923, syn. nov. and Brachyacma trychota Meyrick, 1929, syn. nov. of M. ioloncha (Meyrick, 1905); Lipatia crotalariellaBusck, 1910, syn. nov. of M. adustipennis (Walsingham, 1897); Brachyacma epichorda Turner, 1919, syn. nov. of M.epiochra (Meyrick, 1886); Mesophleps pudicellus var. apicellus Caradja, 1920, syn. nov. and Mesophleps silacellus subsp.calaritanus Amsel, 1939, syn. nov. of M. silacella (Hübner, 1796); Mesophleps lala Agenjo, [1961], syn. nov. of M.corsicella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1856); Crossobela barysphena Meyrick, 1923, syn. nov. of M. trinotella Herrich-Schäffer,1856; Mesophleps orientella Nel & Nel, 2003, syn. n. and Mesophleps gallicella Varenne & Nel, 2011, syn. nov. of M.ochracella (Turati, 1926); Nothris centrothetis Meyrick, 1904, syn. nov. and Nothris chloristis Meyrick, 1904, syn. nov.of M. chloranthes (Lower, 1900); Mesophleps cinerellus Turati, 1930, syn. nov. of Aponoea obtusipalpis Walsingham,1905. One genus and one species are recalled from synonymy: Pycnobathra Lower, 1901, gen. rev., and M. ioloncha(Meyrick, 1905) sp. rev. Lectotypes are designated, in accordance with the Code, article 74.7.3, for 14 species: Gelechiapalpigera Walsingham, 1891; Paraspistes ioloncha Meyrick, 1905; Lathontogenus adustipennis Walsingham, 1897;Brachyacma epichorda Turner, 1919; Nothris crocina Meyrick, 1904; Nothris ochracella Turati, 1926; Nothris tephrastisMeyrick, 1904; Ypsolophus ochroloma Lower, 1901; Ypsolophus macrosemus Lower, 1900; Nothris centrothetis Meyrick,1904; Nothris chloristis Meyrick, 1904; Ypsolophus argonota Lower, 1901; Mesophleps arnaldi Turati & Krüger, 1936,and Mesophleps cinerellus Turati, 1930. Mesophleps is a widely distributed Old World genus, except for one New Worldspecies, with seed-feeding larvae on Cupressaceae, Cistaceae, Cruciferae (Brassicaceae), Leguminosae (Fabaceae), Rubiaceae and doubtfully Dipterocarpaceae.

Genomic sequencing (or morphology when indicated) and analysis of Hesperiidae that includes a number of primary type specimens reveals inconsistencies between the phylogenetic trees and the current classification that are resolved here. The following taxonomic changes are proposed. Oeonus Godman, 1900, stat. nov. is a subgenus of Oxynthes Godman, 1900. Decinea lydora (Plötz, 1882), stat. rev. is a valid species, not a synonym of Lindra neroides (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869), comb. nov. The following are: species-level taxa, not subspecies: Cabirus junta Evans, 1952, stat. nov. and Cabirus purda Evans, 1952, stat. nov. (not Cabirus procas (Cramer, 1777)), Orthos hyalinus (E. Bell, 1930), stat. rest. and Orthos minka Evans, 1955, stat. nov. (not Orthos orthos (Godman, 1900)), Eprius obrepta (Kivirikko, 1936), stat. rest. (not Eprius veleda (Godman, 1901)), Corra catargyra (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867), stat. rest. and Corra conka (Evans, 1955), stat. nov. (not Corra coryna (Hewitson, 1866)), Cymaenes macintyrei Hayward, 1939, stat. rest. (not Cymaenes tripunctata (Latreille, [1824])), Duroca lenta (Evans, 1955), stat. rest. (not Duroca duroca Plötz, 1882), Oarisma (Copaeodes) favor (Evans, 1955), stat. nov. (not Oarisma (Copaeodes) jean (Evans, 1955)), Panoquina eugeon (Godman & Salvin, 1896), stat. rest., Panoquina calna Evans, 1955, stat. nov. and Panoquina albistriga O. Mielke, 1980, stat. nov. (not Panoquina panoquinoides (Skinner, 1891)); subspecies-level taxa, not species: Carystus elvira rufoventris Austin & O. Mielke, 2007, stat. nov.; junior subjective synonyms: Bungalotis gagarini O. Mielke, 1967, syn. nov. of Bungalotis corentinus (Plötz, 1882), Salantoia dinka (Evans, 1952), syn. nov. of Adina adrastor (Mabille and Boullet, 1912), Lindra brasus ackeryi O. Mielke, 1978, stat. nov. of Lindra neroides neroides (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) (but Lindra brasus (O. Mielke, 1968) is still a valid species), Vidius felus O. Mielke, 1968, syn. nov. of Vidius dagon (Evans, 1955), comb. nov., and Cobalopsis dorpa de Jong, 1983, syn. nov. of Vidius catocala (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869), comb. nov.; new genus-species combinations: Oxynthes (Oxynthes) egma (Evans, 1955), comb. nov. (not Oeonus Godman, 1900), Lindra neroides (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869), comb. nov. (not Decinea Evans, 1955), Mucia rusta (Evans, 1955), comb. nov. (not Psoralis Mabille, 1904), Rhomba mirnae (Siewert, Nakamura & O. Mielke, 2014), comb. nov. (not Alychna Grishin, 2019), Eprius planus (Weeks, 1901), comb. nov. and Eprius penna (Evans, 1955), comb. nov. (changed based on morphology) (not Mnasicles Godman, 1901), Lattus minor (O. Mielke, 1967), comb. nov. (not Eutocus Godman, 1901), Panca fiedleri (Carneiro, O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2015), comb. nov., Eutocus rogan (Evans, 1955), comb. nov. (changed based on morphology and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) DNA barcode) and Eutocus brasilia (Carneiro, O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2015), comb. nov. (not Ginungagapus Carneiro, O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2015), Eutocus fosca (Evans, 1955), comb. nov. (not Artines Godman, 1901), Rectava cascatona (O. Mielke, 1992), comb. nov. (not Papias Godman, 1900), Lurida zama (Hayward, 1939), comb. nov. and Vehilius campestris (O. Mielke, 1980), comb. nov. (not Cymaenes Scudder, 1872), Corra xanthus (O. Mielke, 1989), comb. nov., Cymaenes catarinae (O. Mielke, 1989), comb. nov., Vehilius spitzi (O. Mielke, 1967), comb. nov., Vehilius tinta (Evans, 1955), comb. nov. (not Vidius Evans, 1955), Cymaenes incomptus (Hayward, 1934), comb. nov. and Vehilius tanta (Evans, 1955), comb. nov. (not Nastra Evans, 1955), Vidius catocala (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869), comb. nov. Vidius cocalus (Hayward, 1939), comb. nov., Vidius dagon (Evans, 1955), and Vidius obscurior (Hayward, 1934), comb. nov. (not Cobalopsis Godman, 1900), Duroca caraca (O. Mielke, 1992), comb. nov. (not Lerema Scudder, 1872), and Cantha eteocla (Plötz, 1882), comb. nov. and Cantha buriti (O. Mielke, 1968), comb. nov. (not Phlebodes Hübner, [1819]); and new species-subspecies combinations: Lindra neroides huxleyi O. Mielke, 1978, comb. nov. (not Lindra brasus (O. Mielke, 1968)), Corra conka argentus (H. Freeman, 1969), stat. nov. (not Corra coryna (Hewitson, 1866)), Panoquina eugeon minima de Jong, 1983, comb. nov. (not Panoquina panoquinoides (Skinner, 1891)). The following neotype and lectotypes are designated to ensure nomenclatural identity and stability: neotype of Cobalus neroides Herrich-Schäffer, 1869 and lectotypes of Cobalus catocala Herrich-Schäffer, 1869 and Lerema elgina Schaus, 1902.

RESUMENEl artículo tiene tres secciones. En la primera he estudiado los cambios a largo plazo del producto final de la agricultura española entre 1891/13. En la segunda sección, los datos con interpretaciones para regiones de España en 1929/33. Por último muestro los cambios en la productividad de estas regiones entre 1909/13 y 1929/33, la época identificada con el mayor crecimiento en la productividad. El artículo también tiene apéndices con los métodos utilizados para hacer los cálculos y cuadros mostrando los resultados por provincia.

Few figures are more rapidly forgotten than dead journalists, except perhaps dead cartoonists. Yet the graphic work of Sir David Low (1891–1963) has not entirely slipped from memory. He is recalled as the inventor of the contradictory certainties of Colonel Blimp and as a scourge of appeasement. Particularly in the years immediately before, during and after the Second World War he achieved an international reputation. He was not perceived, and did not see himself, as a “funny man” but as a commentator on and analyst of international politics. His cartooning he presented as a form of argument to educate opinion in defence of liberal values and democratic institutions and in favour of rational conduct in international affairs. For these reasons his graphic and print journalism are revealing about the strengths and limitations of the outlook which might be termed “liberal internationalism.” Precisely because of this ideological content the United States became crucial in Low's thought at a time when liberal values and democratic institutions seemed under imminent threat and American capacity to accede to or refuse the role of “successor to John Bull” more apparent.

Нечаева Могила – единственный сохранившийся до наших дней скифский царский курган-гигант в Северном Причерноморье. С 1853 г. он известен российским археологам. Его высота на сегодняшний день составляет 14–15 м. За последние два века курган претерпел существенные изменения. В середине 19 ст. были отмечены просадки насыпи, затем на вершине был вырыт глубокий колодец, позднее засыпанный, и на его месте выстроена беседка. Особо трагическую роль курган сыграл в годы Великой Отечественной войны, когда он был одним из узловых опорных пунктов войск вермахта в Никопольско-Криворожской наступательной операции Красной армии в декабре 1943 г. – январе 1944 г., в ходе которой была разгромлена криворожско–никопольская группировка, пытавшаяся удержать любой ценой Никопольский марганцевый и Криворожский железорудный бассейны. В боях за Нечаеву Могилу полегло более полутора тысяч советских воинов. Сам курган, в особенности его вершина, был изрыт блиндажами и ходами сообщений, а также сотнями воронок от снарядов. После войны вершина кургана была полностью перепланирована и на ней был установлен триангуляционный пункт высшей категории. Все факты указывают на то, что ранее курган входил в число крупнейших скифских царских курганов Северного Причерноморья и имел высоту не менее 20 м. Библиографические ссылки Артамонов М.И. Из истории методики археологических раскопок // ПИДО. 1935. № 1–2. С. 142–164. Бидзиля В.И., Полин С.В. Скифский царский курган Гайманова Могила. Киев: Скиф, 2012. 814 с. Бобринский А.А. Вновь открытая могила скифского царя // ИТУАК. 1913. № 50. Браун Ф.А. Разыскания в области гото-славянских отношений. СПб.: Тип. Имп. Акад. наук, 1899. ХХ, 392 с. Брун Ф.И. Черноморье. Сборник исследований по исторической географии Южной России. Одесса: Тип. Г. Ульриха, 1880. Ч. 2. 422 с. Бурачков П. О местоположении древнего города Каркинитеса и монетах ему принадлежащих // Записки Одесского общества истории древностей (ЗООИД). Одесса,1875. Т. 9. С. 1–133. Вертильяк Н. Описание Белозерского городища // Записки Одесского общества истории древностей (ЗООИД). Одесса,1858. Т. IV. С. 143–145. Виноградов Ю.Г., Яценко І.В. Археологічна діяльність Б.М. Гракова на Україні // Археологія. 1990. № 3. С. 86–92. Граков Б.Н. Отчет Никопольской археологической экспедиции за 1939 г. // НА ИА НАНУ. Фонд ИИМК. № 30–33. Граков Б. Нікопольська експедиція // Археологія. 1947. № 1. С. 191. Граков Б.Н. Отчет Скифской (Никопольской) экспедиции ИИМК АН СССР за 1947 г. // НА ИА НАНУ. № 1947/36-А Граков Б.Н. Никопольская экспедиция // КСИИМК. 1947б. Вып. XXI. С. 73–74. Граков Б.Н. Каменское городище на Днепре / МИА. № 36. М.: АН СССР, 1954. 238 с. Дараган М.Н. Курганы степной части Украины: пространственный анализ и визуализация методами ГИС-Технологий // Виртуальная археология (неразрушающие методы исследований, моделирование, реконструкции): Материалы Первой Международной конференции. СПб.: ГЭ, 2012. С. 76–85. Дараган М.Н. Пространственная характеристика Александропольского кургана // Полин С.В., Алексеев А.Ю. Скифский царский Александропольский курган IV в. до н.э. в Нижнем Поднепровье. Киев; Берлин: Изд. Олег Філюк, 2018. С. 732–740. Древности Геродотовой Скифии (ДГС II). Сборник описаний археологических раскопок и находок в Черноморских степях. СПб: Типография Императорской Академии наук, 1872. Вып. II. 118 с. + Приложение. С. XVII–CXXVII Древности Геродотовой Скифии (ДГС II). Атлас – Древности Геродотовой Скифии. Сборник описаний археологических раскопок и находок в Черноморских степях. СПб.: Тип. Имп. Акад. наук, 1872. Вып. II. Атлас. Табл. XXII–XL. Дмітров Л.Д. Кургани Нікопольбуду. Звіт про роботу археологічної експедиції // НА ИА НАНУ. Фонд ИИМК. 1935–36. № 10-11. Дмитров Л.Д. Археологические работы по исследованию Никополя в 1936 г. Предварительный отчет и перспективные предложения Никопольской археологической экспедиции // НА ИА НАНУ. Фонд ИИМК. 1936. № 12. Дмітров Л.Д. Археологічне вивчення Нікопольщини в 1935–1936 рр. // Наукові записки Iнституту історії і археології. Київ, 1946. Кн. II. С. 55–73. Дмітров Л.Д. Археологічне вивчення Нікопольщини в 1935–1936 рр. // Археологія. 1950. Т. III. C. 151–166. Доклад профессора Д.И. Эварницкого о произведенных им раскопках курганов и исторических исследованиях. Екатеринослав, 1904. 23 с. Забелин И.Е. Скифские могилы. Чертомлыцкий курган // ДТМАО. 1865. Т. 1. С. 71–90. Зайцев Ю.П., Мордвинцева В.И. Ногайчинский курган в степном Крыму // ВДИ. 2003. № 3. С. 61–99. Заседания Московского Предварительного Комитета XIII Археологического Съезда // Труды XIII АС. М., 1908. Т. 2. C. 121–142. Ильинская В.А. Скифские курганы около г. Борисполя // СА. 1966. № 3. С. 152–171. История Великой Отечественной войны Советского Союза. 1941–1945. Т. 3. / Ред. Ю.П. Петров. М: Воен. изд-во МО СССР, 1961. 659 с. Колтухов С.Г. Скифы Крымского Присивашья в VII–IV вв. до н.э. Погребальные памятники / Материалы к археологической карте Крыма. Вып. X. Симферополь: Изд-во ЧП «Предприятие Феникс», 2012. 138 с. Колтухов С.Г. Скифы Северо-западного Крыма в VII–IV вв. до н.э. (погребальные памятники) / Археологический альманах № 27. Донецк: Донбасс, 2012. 265 с. Лазаревский Я. Александропольский курган. Могила скифского царя // ЗРАО. 1894. Т. VII. Вып. 1–2. СПб. С. 24–46, 16 табл. Манцевич А.П. Курган Солоха. Публикация одной коллекции. Л: Искусство, 1987. 143 с. Марти Ю. Сто лет Керченского музея. Исторический очерк. Керчь: Гос. Керчен. арх. музей, 1926. IV, 96 с. Мелюкова А.И., Яценко И.В. Первые экспедиции с Б.Н. Граковым // РА. 1999. № 4. С. 215–220.Мемуары, относящиеся к истории Южной Руси. Вып. I. / ред. В. Антонович. Кіевь: Тіп. Г.Е. Корчакь-Новицкаго, 1890. 141 с. Мозолевський Б.М. Товста Могила. Київ: Наукова думка, 1979. 248 с. Мозолевский Б.Н. Скифский царский курган Желтокаменка // Древности степной Скифии / Отв.ред. А.И. Тереножкин. К: Наукова думка, 1982. С. 179–222. Мозолевський Б.М. Скіфський степ. Київ: Наукова думка, 1983. 197 с. Мозолевский Б.Н. К вопросу о скифском Герросе // CА. 1986. № 2. С. 70–83.Мозолевський Б.М. Кургани вищої скіфської знаті і проблема політичного устрою Скіфії // Археологія. 1990. № 1. С. 122–138. Мозолевский Б.Н., Полин С.В. Курганы скифского Герроса IV в. до н.э. (Бабина, Водяна и Соболева могилы). Киев: Стилос, 2005. 599 с. Мощанский И.Б. Освобождение Правобережной Украины. М.: Вече, 2011. 320 с. Самоквасов Д.Я. Могилы Русской земли. IV. М.: Синод. тип., 1908. 271 с. ОАК за 1891 г. СПб., 1893. 187 с. ОАК 1899. СПб., 1902. 184 с. ОАК 1900. СПб., 1902. 173 с. Об археологических разысканиях 1852–53–54 – Об археологических разысканиях в Екатеринославской губернии в 1852, 1853 и 1854 гг. // РА ИИМК РАН, ф.9, д. № 43. 110 л. О командировании 1852–53 – О командировании коллежского советника Терещенко для археологических разысканий на юге России и расследовании Луговой Могилы // РА ИИМК РАН, ф. 9, д. 6. О раскопках 1855-А – О раскопках в Екатеринославской губернии в 1855 г. // РА ИИМК РАН, ф. 9, д. 49а. 132 л. Отрощенко В.В., Болтрик Ю.В. Культурно-хронологическое и территориальное распределение могильников Днепро-Молочанской степной области // Материалы по хронологии археологических памятников Украины / Отв. ред. Д.Я. Телегин. Київ: Наукова думка, 1982. С. 38–46. Падалка Л. Каменный Затон и Белозерское городище на Днепре // Киевская старина. 1891. Т. 35. С. 384–390. Полин С.В., Алексеев А.Ю. Скифский царский Александропольский курган IV в. до н.э. в Нижнем Поднепровье. Киев; Берлин: Олег Філюк, 2018. 926 с. Пояснительная записка к проекту вскрытия скифского захоронения (“Нечаевой Могилы”) в Днепропетровской области. Орджоникидзе, 1966 (архив С.В. Полина). Пустовалов С.Ж. Реконструкція чисельності катакомбного населення за курганними похованнями Північного Причорномор’я // Археологія. 1997. № 3. С. 40–49. Путешествия в восточные страны Плано Карпини и Рубрука / Ред., вступ. ст. и прим. Н.П. Шастиной. М.: Гос. изд-во геогр. л-ры, 1957. 287 с. Сибирский А.А. Донесение министру уделов Л.А.Перовскому о раскопках в Феодосии и кургане, находящемся близ селения Александрополя Екатеринославской губ. // РА ИИМК РАН, ф. 9, д. 20. 15 л. Соколов В. Белозерское городище на Днепре // Киевская старина. 1892. Т. 38. C. 225–245 Сосса Р.І. Історія картографування території України. Від найданіших часів до 1920 р. Київ: Наукова думка 2000. 247 с. Тереножкин А.И., Ильинская В.А., Черненко Е.В. Отчет о работе Скифской Никопольской экспедиции 1965 г. // НА ИА НАНУ, № 1965/7. Тереножкин А.И., Ильинская В.А., Черненко Е.В., Мозолевский Б.Н. Скифские курганы Никопольщины // Скифские древности / Отв. ред. В.А. Ильинская, А.И. Тереножкин. Киев: Наукова думка, 1973. С. 113–186. Терещенко А. Очерки Новороссийского края // ЖМНП. 1853. № 4. С. 1–30. Терещенко А. Очерки Новороссийского края // ЖМНП. 1853. № 5. С. 55–75. Терещенко А. Очерки Новороссийского края // ЖМНП. 1853. № 7. С. 1–69. Терещенко А. О могильных насыпях и каменных бабах в Екатеринославской и Таврической губ. // Чтения в императорском обществе истории и древностей Российских при Московском университете. Кн. IV. / Ред. О.М. Водянский. М., 1866. С. 1–37. Уваров А.С. Исследования о древностях Южной России и берегов Черного моря. Вып. 1СПб.: Тип. экспедиции загот. гос. бумаг, 1851. 138 с. Черненко Е.В. Скифские курганы на Никопольщине // Записки Одесского археологического общества. Т. 2 (35). Одесса. 1967. С. 179–191. Черных Л.А., Дараган М.Н. Курганы эпохи энеолита-бронзы междуречья Базавлука, Соленой, Чертомлыка. Киев: Издатель Олег Филюк, 2014. 568 с. Черняков І.Т. Кургани в культурі України / Чмихов М.О. Курганні пам’ятки як явище давньої культури. Київ: НМК ВО, 1993. 144 с. Чирков А. Краткий очерк городищ, находящихся по Днепру и его лиману // Записки Одесского общества истории древностей (ЗООИД). Одесса,1867. Т. 6. С. 546–550. Чуйков В.И. От Сталинграда до Берлина. М.: Воениздат, 1980. 672 с. Шпеер А. Воспоминания. М.: Захаров, 2010. 679 с. Юргевич В.Н. Исторический очерк 50-летия Императорского Одесского общества истории и древностей. Одесса: Тип. А. Шульце, 1889. 121 с. Daragan M. The Use of GIS Technologies in Studying the Spatial and Time Concentration of Tumuli in the Scythian-time Lower Dnieper Region // Tumulus as Sema Space, Politics, Culture and Religion in the First Millennium BC Vol. 27. / Topoi – Berlin Studies of the Ancient World / Topoi – Berliner Studien der Alten Welt / Edited by: Olivier Henry and Ute Kelp. Berlin, 2016. Рp. 337–346.

Adli Diş Hekimliği’nin Kurucusu Oscar Amoedo 1863-1945 Dr. Oscar Amoedo, Küba' nın Matanzas şehrinde, 10 Kasım 18Ğ3 tarihinde, orta halli bir ailenin, ortanca çocuğu olarak doğdu. Havana Üniversitesi' ndeki eğitimini takiben, New York Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi' ne kabul edildi. 1888 yılında eğitimini tamamladığında, tekrar Küba' ya döndü. 1889 yılında, Paris ' teki Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği kongresine, Küba ‘ yı temsilen katıldı. Bu toplantı sırasında, Paris 1 te kalması ve mesleğini orada tatbik etmesi yönünde teklif aldı. Bu teklifi kabul ederek, Paris' e yerleşti. Paris Diş Hekimliği Okulu' nda çalışmaya başladı. 1890 yılında klinik öğretici, 1891 yılında yardımcı doçent ve 1895 yılında profesör ün- vanlarını aldı. Söz konusu merkezde, 1905 yılına dek para almadan çalıştı. Paris' teki ilk yıllarında geçimini, latin mahallesindeki küçük bir otelde kiraladığı odayı, diş muayenehanesine dönüştürerek sağladı. Bu yıllarda muayenehanesine pek çok öğrenci gelip gitti. Sonraki yıllarda ise, en büyük destekçisi ve aynı zamanda dostu olan Profesör Poirier ' in de desteği ile, daha iyi bir muhitte muayenehane açma ve çalışma imkanını yakaladı. Dr. Oscar Amoedo, diş hekimliğinin pek çok yönü ile ilgilenmiştir. Yaşamı boyunca 120' den fazla makalesi yayınlanan Amoedo, aynı zamanda şırıngalar, pensler, diş kanalı enstrümanları, artikülatörler de dizayn etmiş ve mevcutlarını da geliştirmiştir. Kokain ve etilen klorid ' in diş hekimliğinde lokal anestezik olarak uygun şekilde kullanılması metodunu Amoedo geliştirmiştir. Maksiller sinüs tümörü tedavisi, diş kökü doldurma teknikleri, diş implantasyonları, dişe direk eklemeler ve eklem problemleri çalıştığı diğer alanlar arasındadır. Dr. Oscar Amoedo' nun adli diş hekimliği ile ilgilenmesi 4 Mayıs 1897 ' deki, Charite Çarşısı yangını ile başlamış ve bu yangında ölenlerin kimliklerinin tespiti konusunda başarılı olmuştur. Bu olayı takiben, mevcut bilgi ve tecrübesini literatür çalışmaları ile desteklemiş ve "Adli Tıpta Dişçilik Sanatı" başlığında bir yazı hazırlamıştır. Söz konusu çalışma 1898 yılında, Masson et Cie tarafından basılarak yayınlanmıştır. Dr. Oscar Amoedo bu çalışması ile adli tıbbın diş hekimliği alanındaki yoğun noksanını büyük bir ölçüde doldurmuş ve adli diş hekimliğini kimliklendirme ve müstakil bir çalışma alanı olarak, gerek diş hekimliği içerisinde, gerekse adli tıp içerisinde tanıtmış ve kabul ettirmiştir. Söz konusu kitap, adli diş hekimliği alanında yayınlanmış ilk kapsamlı kitaptır ve konu ile ilgili dönemine ait mevcut tüm gelişmeleri içermektedir. Dr. Oscar Amoedo, dışa dönük bir kişilik ve kelimenin tam anlamı ile mükemmel bir öğretmendi. Diş hekimliği ve tıp ile ilişkili 14 birliğe üye idi. Bu birliklerin 8 ' inde onur üyesi, 4 ' ünde ise iletişimden sorumlu üye olarak yer almıştır. İyi düzeyde İspanyolca, İngilizce ve Fransızca bilen Dr. Oscar Amoedo, yaşamı boyunca 57 profesyonel kongreye katılmış ve bu kongrelerde çok sayıda tebliğ sunmuş, tartışmaya katılmış ya da tartışmayı yönetmiştir. 1936 yılında, 73 yaşında iken katıldığı toplantı iştirak ettiği son bilimsel etkinliktir. Dr. Oscar Amoedo 25 Eylül 1945 tarihinde, 82 yaşında iken, evinde hayata gözlerini yummuştur. Dr. Oscar Amoedo, günümüzde Adli Diş Hekimliği ' nin kurucusu olarak kabul edilmektedir. * Bu yazı, Uzm. Dr. Nevzat Alkan tarafından, editörleri I.R. Hill, S. Keiser-Nielsen, Y. Vermylen, E. Free, E.D. Valck ve E. Tormans olan, "Forensic Odontology: Its Scope and History" başlıklı kitaptan derlenmiştir.

The article is devoted to a peculiar episode of the struggle of Lithuanians against the policy of persecution based on nationality which was pursued by Imperial Russia between 1864 and 1904. Its participants were representatives of the parts of the Lithuanian nation separated by the border between Germany and the Russian Empire – Martynas Jankus (1858–1946), a German citizen, a Lithuanian of East Prussia, the owner of a printing office in Tilsit (Lith. Tilžė, currently Sovetsk, a town in Kaliningrad Oblast, the Russian Federation) and a group of Lithuanian young people who were operating illegally, a group of citizens of the Russian Empire. The time under discussion is the 1890s. During that period, the Lithuanian national movement was rapidly developing and strengthening while striving to bring together both parts of the nation and the USA-based Lithuanian diaspora community. One of the most important measures of the common struggle was the distribution of publications printed in Latin characters in the Lithuanian language which were banned to be published in the territory of Russia but were legally printed in East Prussia and smuggled across the border into Lithuania. From there, the publications were sent to Lithuanian communities all over the Russian Empire. This struggle resulted in victory: the ban was lifted by Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Russia issued in 1904. To strengthen the political opposition, Lithuanian intellectuals printed not only books, brochures and newspapers but also various minor publications – political leaflets. Students of Russian universities and Lithuanian intellectuals graduates of these higher education institutions prepared texts and sent funds intended for their publication to the printing offices of Lithuanians and Germans in East Prussia. The number of such leaflets surviving to the present day is very small. One of these publications was an anonymous card of the size of a standard German postcard (95 x 140 mm). Thus far, three of them have been found in Lithuanian libraries and archives, and one has been discovered in the National Library of Russia in Saint Petersburg. A composition of two illustrations is printed on one side of the card: a Lithuanian countrywoman and a Cossack standing in front of her with a raised whip and a bottle of vodka as a gift for obedience. This symbolised a spread of orthodoxy and the deportation of Lithuanians from their native land. The following exclamation of the Cossack is printed: Are you a Lithuanian? Go to Russia! The explanation of the content of the illustration and the encouragement (first of all, to Catholic believers) to oppose the plans of the authorities are printed in small characters. They are related to the colonisation of Siberia. The statements are well-grounded, the exposition of the subject is logical and written in the correct Lithuanian language. Most probably, it was created by the graduate of the Faculty of Law of the University of Moscow Vladas Mačys (1867–1936). Vaclovas Biržiška, Professor of Law at the University of Lithuania in Kaunas and Director of the University Library, was the first to describe this publication bibliographically. The author regarded this publication as a postcard, attributed it to Martynas Jankus’ printing office and dated it ‘1892’. A more precise description was publicised in the fundamental work of Lithuanian national bibliography Lietuvos TSR bibliografija. Serija A: Knygos lietuvių kalba (Bibliography of the Lithuanian SSR. Series A: Books in the Lithuanian Language; vol. 2: 1862–1904. Book 2 (Vilnius, 1988, p. 401, No. 4065). It was compiled in the Soviet era, and the only available copy stored in Mikhail J. Saltykov-Shchedrin State Public Library (currently renamed the Russian National Library in Sankt Petersburg) served as the basis for it. The present author amended the publication date of the postcard (1891) and specified the circumstances of its distribution, while also ascertaining that the artist of the illustrations was the lithographer of Tilsit Johann Mai.

A review of genus-group names for darkling beetles in the family Tenebrionidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) is presented. A catalogue of 4122 nomenclaturally available genus-group names, representing 2307 valid genera (33 of which are extinct) and 761 valid subgenera, is given. For each name the author, date, page number, gender, type species, type fixation, current status, and first synonymy (when the name is a synonym) are provided. Genus-group names in this family are also recorded in a classification framework, along with data on the distribution of valid genera and subgenera within major biogeographical realms. A list of 535 unavailable genus-group names (e.g., incorrect subsequent spellings) is included. Notes on the date of publication of references cited herein are given, when known. The following genera and subgenera are made available for the first time: Anemiadena Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Cheirodes Gené, 1839), Armigena Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Nesogena Mäklin, 1863), Debeauxiella Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Hyperops Eschscholtz, 1831), Hyperopsis Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Hyperops Eschscholtz, 1831), Linio Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Nilio Latreille, 1802), Matthewsotys Bouchard & Bousquet, gen. nov., Neosolenopistoma Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Eurynotus W. Kirby, 1819), Paragena Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Nesogena Mäklin, 1863), Paulianaria Bouchard & Bousquet, gen. nov., Phyllechus Bouchard & Bousquet, gen. nov., Prorhytinota Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Rhytinota Eschscholtz, 1831), Pseudorozonia Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Rozonia Fairmaire, 1888), Pseudothinobatis Bouchard & Bousquet, gen. nov., Rhytinopsis Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Thalpophilodes Strand, 1942), Rhytistena Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Rhytinota Eschscholtz, 1831), Spinosdara Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Osdara Walker, 1858), Spongesmia Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Adesmia Fischer, 1822), and Zambesmia Bouchard & Bousquet, subgen. nov. (in Adesmia Fischer, 1822). The names Adeps Gistel, 1857 and Adepsion Strand, 1917 syn. nov. [= Tetraphyllus Laporte & Brullé, 1831], Asyrmatus Canzoneri, 1959 syn. nov. [= Pystelops Gozis, 1910], Euzadenos Koch, 1956 syn. nov. [= Selenepistoma Dejean, 1834], Gondwanodilamus Kaszab, 1969 syn. nov. [= Conibius J.L. LeConte, 1851], Gyrinodes Fauvel, 1897 syn. nov. [= Nesotes Allard, 1876], Helopondrus Reitter, 1922 syn. nov. [= Horistelops Gozis, 1910], Hybonotus Dejean, 1834 syn. nov. [= Damatris Laporte, 1840], Iphthimera Reitter, 1916 syn. nov. [= Metriopus Solier, 1835], Lagriomima Pic, 1950 syn. nov. [= Neogria Borchmann, 1911], Orphelops Gozis, 1910 syn. nov. [= Nalassus Mulsant, 1854], Phymatium Billberg, 1820 syn. nov. [= Cryptochile Latreille, 1828], Prosoblapsia Skopin & Kaszab, 1978 syn. nov. [= Genoblaps Bauer, 1921], and Pseudopimelia Gebler, 1859 syn. nov. [= Lasiostola Dejean, 1834] are established as new synonyms (valid names in square brackets). Anachayus Bouchard & Bousquet, nom. nov. is proposed as a replacement name for Chatanayus Ardoin, 1957, Genateropa Bouchard & Bousquet, nom. nov. as a replacement name for Apterogena Ardoin, 1962, Hemipristula Bouchard & Bousquet, nom. nov. as a replacement name for Hemipristis Kolbe, 1903, Kochotella Bouchard & Bousquet, nom. nov. as a replacement name for Millotella Koch, 1962, Medvedevoblaps Bouchard & Bousquet, nom. nov. as a replacement name for Protoblaps G.S. Medvedev, 1998, and Subpterocoma Bouchard & Bousquet, nom. nov. is proposed as a replacement name for Pseudopimelia Motschulsky, 1860. Neoeutrapela Bousquet & Bouchard, 2013 is downgraded to a subgenus (stat. nov.) of Impressosora Pic, 1952. Anchomma J.L. LeConte, 1858 is placed in Stenosini: Dichillina (previously in Pimeliinae: Anepsiini); Entypodera Gerstaecker, 1871, Impressosora Pic, 1952 and Xanthalia Fairmaire, 1894 are placed in Lagriinae: Lagriini: Statirina (previously in Lagriinae: Lagriini: Lagriina); Loxostethus Triplehorn, 1962 is placed in Diaperinae: Diaperini: Diaperina (previously in Diaperinae: Diaperini: Adelinina); Periphanodes Gebien, 1943 is placed in Stenochiinae: Cnodalonini (previously in Tenebrioninae: Helopini); Zadenos Laporte, 1840 is downgraded to a subgenus (stat. nov.) of the older name Selenepistoma Dejean, 1834. The type species [placed in square brackets] of the following available genus-group names are designated for the first time: Allostrongylium Kolbe, 1896 [Allostrongylium silvestre Kolbe, 1896], Auristira Borchmann, 1916 [Auristira octocostata Borchmann, 1916], Blapidocampsia Pic, 1919 [Campsia pallidipes Pic, 1918], Cerostena Solier, 1836 [Cerostena deplanata Solier, 1836], Coracostira Fairmaire, 1899 [Coracostira armipes Fairmaire, 1899], Dischidus Kolbe, 1886 [Helops sinuatus Fabricius, 1801], Eccoptostoma Gebien, 1913 [Taraxides ruficrus Fairmaire, 1894], Ellaemus Pascoe, 1866 [Emcephalus submaculatus Brême, 1842], Epeurycaulus Kolbe, 1902 [Epeurycaulus aldabricus Kolbe, 1902], Euschatia Solier, 1851 [Euschatia proxima Solier, 1851], Heliocaes Bedel, 1906 [Blaps emarginata Fabricius, 1792], Hemipristis Kolbe, 1903 [Hemipristis ukamia Kolbe, 1903], Iphthimera Reitter, 1916 [Stenocara ruficornis Solier, 1835], Isopedus Stein, 1877 [Helops tenebrioides Germar, 1813], Malacova Fairmaire, 1898 [Malacova bicolor Fairmaire, 1898], Modicodisema Pic, 1917 [Disema subopaca Pic, 1912], Peltadesmia Kuntzen, 1916 [Metriopus platynotus Gerstaecker, 1854], Phymatium Billberg, 1820 [Pimelia maculata Fabricius, 1781], Podoces Péringuey, 1886 [Podoces granosula Péringuey, 1886], Pseuduroplatopsis Pic, 1913 [Borchmannia javana Pic, 1913], Pteraulus Solier, 1848 [Pteraulus sulcatipennis Solier, 1848], Sciaca Solier, 1835 [Hylithus disctinctus Solier, 1835], Sterces Champion, 1891 [Sterces violaceipennis Champion, 1891] and Teremenes Carter, 1914 [Tenebrio longipennis Hope, 1843]. Evidence suggests that some type species were misidentified. In these instances, information on the misidentification is provided and, in the following cases, the taxonomic species actually involved is fixed as the type species [placed in square brackets] following requirements in Article 70.3 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature: Accanthopus Dejean, 1821 [Tenebrio velikensis Piller & Mitterpacher, 1783], Becvaramarygmus Masumoto, 1999 [Dietysus nodicornis Gravely, 1915], Heterophaga Dejean, 1834 [Opatrum laevigatum Fabricius, 1781], Laena Dejean, 1821, [Scaurus viennensis Sturm, 1807], Margus Dejean, 1834 [Colydium castaneum Herbst, 1797], Pachycera Eschscholtz, 1831 [Tenebrio buprestoides Fabricius, 1781], Saragus Erichson, 1842 [Celibe costata Solier, 1848], Stene Stephens, 1829 [Colydium castaneum Herbst, 1797], Stenosis Herbst, 1799 [Tagenia intermedia Solier, 1838] and Tentyriopsis Gebien, 1928 [Tentyriopsis pertyi Gebien, 1940]. The following First Reviser actions are proposed to fix the precedence of names or nomenclatural acts (rejected name or act in square brackets): Stenosis ciliaris Gebien, 1920 as the type species for Afronosis G.S. Medvedev, 1995 [Stenosis leontjevi G.S. Medvedev, 1995], Alienoplonyx Bremer, 2019 [Alienolonyx], Amblypteraca Mas-Peinado, Buckley, Ruiz & García-París, 2018 [Amplypteraca], Caenocrypticoides Kaszab, 1969 [Caenocripticoides], Deriles Motschulsky, 1872 [Derilis], Eccoptostira Borchmann, 1936 [Ecoptostira], †Eodromus Haupt, 1950 [†Edromus], Eutelus Solier, 1843 [Lutelus], Euthriptera Reitter, 1893 [Enthriptera], Meglyphus Motschulsky, 1872 [Megliphus], Microtelopsis Koch, 1940 [Extetranosis Koch, 1940, Hypermicrotelopsis Koch, 1940], Neandrosus Pic, 1921 [Neoandrosus], Nodosogylium Pic, 1951 [Nodosogilium], Notiolesthus Motschulsky, 1872 [Notiolosthus], Pseudeucyrtus Pic, 1916 [Pseudocyrtus], Pseudotrichoplatyscelis Kaszab, 1960 [Pseudotrichoplatynoscelis and Pseudotrichoplatycelis], Rhydimorpha Koch, 1943 [Rhytimorpha], Rhophobas Motschulsky, 1872 [Rophobas], Rhyssochiton Gray, 1831 [Ryssocheton and Ryssochiton], Sphaerotidius Kaszab, 1941 [Spaerotidius], Stira Agassiz, 1846 (Mollusca) [Stira Agassiz, 1846 (Coleoptera)], Sulpiusoma Ferrer, 2006 [Sulpiosoma] and Taenobates Motschulsky, 1872 [Taeniobates]. Supporting evidence is provided for the conservation of usage of Cyphaleus Westwood, 1841 nomen protectum over Chrysobalus Boisduval, 1835 nomen oblitum.

El número y contenido de los trabajos sobre Paleontología de Invertebrados publicados por la Revista del Museo de La Plata (RMLP) se correlaciona directamente con el desarrollo de la disciplina en el contexto institucional. Se diferencian cuatro épocas: el período fundacional (entre 1884 y 1905), la primera época universitaria (entre 1906 y 1934), el período de la División Paleozoología Invertebrados y Paleobotánica (entre 1934 y 1966) y el de División Paleozoología Invertebrados (entre 1966 y la actualidad). Entre 1890, año en que se instaló en el Museo la imprenta, en la cual a partir de ese mismo año se comenzaría a imprimir la RMLP, y 1905, año en el cual el Museo pasó a depender de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, las publicaciones institucionales se caracterizaron por la calidad de su diseño e impresión. En esa primera época la RMLP y los Anales del Museo de La Plata constituyeron los medios nacionales casi exclusivos para dar a conocer los estudios realizados en el Museo sobre faunas de invertebrados del país. Santiago Roth, contribuyó notablemente con sus descubrimientos de importantes yacimientos de invertebrados fósiles, algunos de los cuales fueron estudiados por C. Burckhardt. En la segunda época, que comprende los quince años subsiguientes a la incorporación del Museo a la Universidad Nacional de La Plata no hubo en la RMLP nuevas publicaciones sobre invertebrados fósiles. Solamente entre 1922 y 1930 aparecerían en la revista menciones a invertebrados fósiles en relación con las investigaciones de W. Schiller y de S. Roth. En 1934 J. Frenguelli fue designado Secretario y en 1935 director del Instituto del Museo y durante su gestión se renovó la calidad y la periodicidad de las publicaciones existentes. La RMLP, con un total de 34 volúmenes publicados, fue continuada como una nueva serie y alcanzó en esa época su máximo esplendor, no solamente por la calidad y cantidad de los trabajos sino también por la de la impresión, así como por la regularidad de su aparición. Un conjunto de tres investigadores del Museo, E. Fossa Mancini, H. J. Harrington y A.F. Leanza, y otros ajenos a la institución publicaron numerosos trabajos en la RMLP sobre invertebrados del Paleo y Mesozoico. La producción científica del Museo en la década de 1950 fue poco importante. Por último, en 1966 se concretó la partición de la División Paleozoología Invertebrados y Paleobotánica en dos divisiones, y al hacerse cargo A. J. Amos de la jefatura de la División Paleozoología Invertebrados, se inició la cuarta etapa. Amos reunió un equipo de investigadores, que se dedicaron preferentemente al estudio de la fauna y estratigrafía del Paleozoico. Sin embargo, toda esta actividad solo se reflejó parcialmente en los artículos publicados en la RMLP. Los trabajos incluidos en ella correspondieron mayormente tesis doctorales que en razón de su extensión no resultaban fácilmente publicables en otros medios. En la década de 1970 hubo una falta de continuidad en las investigaciones y en las publicaciones institucionales, de manera tal que, en 1974 y 1975 no se publicó ningún número de la RMLP y en el resto de la década el flujo fue irregular, durante más de diez años no se publicaron trabajos sobre invertebrados fósiles y en la década de 1980 solamente se publicaron cuatro trabajos sobre esta temática. A partir de fines de la década de 1980 y durante las dos décadas siguientes no existió ninguna política institucional definida con respecto a las publicaciones del Museo. Sobre Paleontología solamente se publicaron cinco trabajos entre 1990 y 1992, de ellos uno solo sobre invertebrados. En 2012 se publicaron seis trabajos sobre Ch. Darwin, algunos de los cuales hicieron referencia a invertebrados fósiles. A partir de 2016 la RMLP abandonó el formato que había mantenido la Nueva Serie desde 1936 e inició una nueva numeración con un solo volumen por año en el cual se incluyeron indistintamente trabajos de las diferentes orientaciones de las ciencias naturales. En esta nueva revista solamente se publicó un trabajo sobre invertebrados fósiles, aunque un volumen con trabajos dedicados a la Historia de La Geología, incluyó algunos trabajos con aspectos históricos de la paleontología de invertebrados en la Argentina. La RMLP también dedicó un número a historiar la participación de investigadores de origen ruso, incluyendo paleontólogos, en las actividades desarrolladas en América Latina.

The genus Olios Walckenaer, 1837 is revised, a generic diagnosis is given and an identification key to eight species groups is provided. Olios in its revised sense includes 87 species and is distributed in Africa, southern Europe and Asia. Three species groups are revised in this first part, an identification key to species for each group is provided, five new species are described and all included species are illustrated. The Olios argelasius-group includes O. argelasius Walckenaer, 1806, O. canariensis (Lucas, 1838), O. pictus (Simon, 1885), O. fasciculatus Simon, 1880 and O. kunzi spec. nov. (male, female; Namibia, Zambia, South Africa); it is distributed in the Mediterranean region, northern Africa including Canary Islands, in the Middle East, South Sudan, East Africa, and southern Africa. The Olios coenobitus-group includes O. angolensis spec. nov. (male; Angola), O. coenobitus Fage, 1926, O. denticulus spec. nov. (male; Java), O. erraticus Fage, 1926, O. gambiensis spec. nov. (male, female; Gambia), O. milleti (Pocock, 1901b), O. mordax (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1899) and O. pusillus Simon, 1880; it is distributed in Africa (Gambia, Angola, Tanzania, Madagascar) and Asia (India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia: Java). The Olios auricomis-group includes only O. auricomis (Simon, 1880), distributed in Africa south of 10°N. Other species groups are introduced briefly and will be revised in forthcoming revisions. The Olios correvoni-group includes currently O. claviger (Pocock, 1901a), O. correvoni Lessert, 1921, O. correvoni choupangensis Lessert, 1936, O. darlingi (Pocock, 1901a), O. faesi Lessert, 1933, O. freyi Lessert, 1929, O. kassenjicola Strand, 1916b, O. kruegeri (Simon, 1897a), O. quadrispilotus (Simon, 1880) comb. nov., O. lucieni comb. nov. nom. nov., O. sjostedti Lessert, 1921 and O. triarmatus Lessert, 1936; it is distributed in Africa (Zimbabwe, Tanzania incl. Zanzibar, Angola, Congo, Central Africa, South Africa, Botswana; O. darlingi was recorded from Zimbabwe and Botswana and not from South Africa). The Olios rossettii-group includes: O. baulnyi (Simon, 1874), O. bhattacharjeei (Saha & Raychaudhuri, 2007), O. brachycephalus Lawrence, 1938, O. floweri Lessert, 1921, O. jaldaparaensis Saha & Raychaudhuri, 2007, O. japonicus Jäger & Ono, 2000, O. kolosvaryi (Caporiacco, 1947b) comb. nov., O. longipes (Simon, 1884b), O. lutescens (Thorell, 1894), O. mahabangkawitus Barrion & Litsinger, 1995, O. obesulus (Pocock, 1901b), O. rossettii (Leardi, 1901), O. rotundiceps (Pocock, 1901b), O. sericeus (Kroneberg, 1875), O. sherwoodi Lessert, 1929, O. suavis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1876), O. tarandus (Simon, 1897d), O. tener (Thorell, 1891) and O. tiantongensis (Zhang & Kim, 1996); it is distributed in the Mediterranean region, in Africa (especially eastern half) and Asia (Middle East and Central Asia to Japan, Philippines and Java). The Olios nentwigi-group includes O. diao Jäger, 2012, O. digitatus Sun, Li & Zhang, 2011, O. jaenicke Jäger, 2012, O. muang Jäger, 2012, O. nanningensis (Hu & Ru, 1988), O. nentwigi spec. nov. (male, female; Indonesia: Krakatau), O. perezi Barrion & Litsinger, 1995, O. scalptor Jäger & Ono, 2001 and O. suung Jäger, 2012; it is distributed in Asia (Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Philippines), Papua New Guinea and Mariana Islands. Olios diao is newly recorded from Cambodia and Champasak Province in Laos. The Olios stimulator-group includes O. admiratus (Pocock, 1901b), O. hampsoni (Pocock, 1901b), O. lamarcki (Latreille, 1806) and O. stimulator Simon, 1897c; it is distributed in Africa (Madagascar, Seychelles), Middle East and South Asia (United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Maldives, Sri Lanka). The Olios hirtus-group includes O. bungarensis Strand, 1913b, O. debalae (Biswas & Roy, 2005), O. ferox (Thorell, 1892), O. hirtus (Karsch, 1879a), O. igraya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov., O. menghaiensis (Wang & Zhang, 1990), O. nigrifrons (Simon, 1897b), O. punctipes Simon, 1884a, O. punctipes sordidatus (Thorell, 1895), O. pyrozonis (Pocock, 1901b), O. sungaya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov., O. taprobanicus Strand, 1913b and O. tikaderi Kundu et al., 1999; it is distributed in South, East and Southeast Asia (Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Myanmar, China, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines). Nineteen synonyms are recognised: Nisueta Simon, 1880, Nonianus Simon, 1885, both = Olios syn. nov.; O. spenceri Pocock, 1896, O. werneri (Simon, 1906a), O. albertius Strand, 1913a, O. banananus Strand, 1916a, O. aristophanei Lessert, 1936, all = O. fasciculatus; O. subpusillus Strand, 1907c = O. pusillus; O. schonlandi (Pocock, 1900b), O. rufilatus Pocock, 1900c, O. chiracanthiformis Strand, 1906, O. ituricus Strand, 1913a, O. isongonis Strand, 1915, O. flavescens Caporiacco, 1941 comb. nov., O. pacifer Lessert, 1921, all = O. auricomis; Olios sanguinifrons (Simon, 1906b) = O. rossettii Leardi, 1901; O. phipsoni (Pocock, 1899), Sparassus iranii (Pocock, 1901b), both = O. stimulator; O. fuligineus (Pocock, 1901b) = O. hampsoni. Nine species are transferred to Olios: O. gaujoni (Simon, 1897b) comb. nov., O. pictus comb. nov., O. unilateralis (Strand, 1908b) comb. nov. (all three from Nonianus), O. affinis (Strand, 1906) comb. nov., O. flavescens Caporiacco, 1941 comb. nov., O. quadrispilotus comb. nov., O. similis (Berland, 1922) comb. nov. (all four from Nisueta), O. sungaya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov., O. igraya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov. (both from Isopeda L. Koch 1875). Olios lucieni nom. nov. comb. nov. is proposed for Nisueta similis Berland, 1922, which becomes a secondary homonym. The male of O. quadrispilotus comb. nov. is described for the first time. Sixteen species are currently without affiliation to one of the eight species groups: O. acolastus (Thorell, 1890), O. alluaudi Simon, 1887a, O. batesi (Pocock, 1900c), O. bhavnagarensis Sethi & Tikader, 1988, O. croseiceps (Pocock, 1898b), O. durlaviae Biswas & Raychaudhuri, 2005, O. gentilis (Karsch, 1879b), O. gravelyi Sethi & Tikader, 1988, O. greeni (Pocock, 1901b), O. inaequipes (Simon 1890), O. punjabensis Dyal, 1935, O. ruwenzoricus Strand, 1913a, O. senilis Simon, 1880, O. somalicus Caporiacco, 1940, O. wroughtoni (Simon, 1897c) and O. zulu Simon, 1880. Five of these species are illustrated in order to allow identification of the opposite (male) sex and to settle their systematic placement. Thirty-seven species are considered nomina dubia, mostly because they were described from immatures, three of them are illustrated: O. abnormis (Blackwall, 1866), O. affinis (Strand, 1906) comb. nov., O. africanus (Karsch, 1878), O. amanensis Strand, 1907a, O. annandalei (Simon, 1901), O. bivittatus Roewer, 1951, O. ceylonicus (Leardi, 1902), O. conspersipes (Thorell, 1899), Palystes derasus (C.L. Koch, 1845) comb. nov., O. detritus (C.L. Koch, 1845), O. digitalis Eydoux & Souleyet, 1842, O. exterritorialis Strand, 1907b, O. flavovittatus (Caporiacco, 1935), O. fugax (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885), O. guineibius Strand, 1911c, O. guttipes (Simon, 1897a), O. kiranae Sethi & Tikader, 1988, O. longespinus Caporiacco, 1947b, O. maculinotatus Strand, 1909, O. morbillosus (MacLeay, 1827), O. occidentalis (Karsch, 1879b), O. ornatus (Thorell, 1877), O. pagurus Walckenaer, 1837, O. patagiatus (Simon, 1897b), O. praecinctus (L. Koch, 1865), O. provocator Walckenaer, 1837, O. quesitio Moradmand, 2013, O. quinquelineatus Taczanowski, 1872, O. sexpunctatus Caporiacco, 1947a, Heteropoda similaris (Rainbow, 1898) comb. rev., O. socotranus (Pocock, 1903), O. striatus (Blackwall, 1867), O. timidus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885), Remmius variatus (Thorell, 1899) comb. nov., O. vittifemur Strand, 1916b, O. wolfi Strand, 1911a and O. zebra (Thorell, 1881). Eighty-nine species are misplaced in Olios but cannot be affiliated to any of the known genera. They belong to the subfamilies Deleninae Hogg, 1903, Sparassinae Bertkau, 1872 and Palystinae Simon, 1897a, nineteen of them are illustrated: O. acostae Schenkel, 1953, O. actaeon (Pocock, 1898c), O. artemis Hogg, 1915, O. atomarius Simon, 1880, O. attractus Petrunkevitch, 1911, O. auranticus Mello-Leitão, 1918, O. benitensis (Pocock, 1900c), O. berlandi Roewer, 1951, O. biarmatus Lessert, 1925, O. canalae Berland, 1924, O. caprinus Mello-Leitão, 1918, O. chelifer Lawrence, 1937, O. chubbi Lessert, 1923, O. clarus (Keyserling, 1880), O. coccineiventris (Simon, 1880), O. corallinus Schmidt, 1971, O. crassus Banks, 1909, O. debilipes Mello-Leitão, 1945, O. discolorichelis Caporiacco, 1947a, O. erroneus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890, O. extensus Berland, 1924, O. fasciiventris Simon, 1880 , O. feldmanni Strand, 1915, O. fimbriatus Chrysanthus, 1965, O. flavens Nicolet, 1849, O. fonticola (Pocock, 1902), O. formosus Banks, 1929, O. francoisi (Simon, 1898a), O. fulvithorax Berland, 1924, O. galapagoensis Banks, 1902, O. gaujoni (Simon, 1897b) comb. nov., O. giganteus Keyserling, 1884, O. hoplites Caporiacco, 1941, O. humboldtianus Berland, 1924, O. insignifer Chrysanthus, 1965, O. insulanus (Thorell, 1881), O. keyserlingi (Simon, 1880), O. lacticolor Lawrence, 1952, O. lepidus Vellard, 1924, O. longipedatus Roewer, 1951, O. machadoi Lawrence, 1952, O. macroepigynus Soares, 1944, O. maculatus Blackwall, 1862, O. marshalli (Pocock, 1898a), O. mathani (Simon, 1880), O. minensis Mello-Leitão, 1917, O. monticola Berland, 1924, O. mutabilis Mello-Leitão, 1917, O. mygalinus Doleschall, 1857, O. mygalinus cinctipes Merian, 1911, O. mygalinus nirgripalpis Merian, 1911, O. neocaledonicus Berland, 1924, O. nigristernis (Simon, 1880), O. nigriventris Taczanowski, 1872, O. oberzelleri Kritscher, 1966, O. obscurus (Keyserling, 1880), O. obtusus F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900, O. orchiticus Mello-Leitão, 1930, O. oubatchensis Berland, 1924, O. paraensis (Keyserling, 1880), O. pellucidus (Keyserling, 1880), O. peruvianus Roewer, 1951, O. pictitarsis Simon, 1880, O. plumipes Mello-Leitão, 1937, O. princeps Hogg, 1914, O. pulchripes (Thorell, 1899), O. puniceus (Simon, 1880), O. roeweri Caporiacco, 1955a, O. rubripes Taczanowski, 1872, O. rubriventris (Thorell, 1881), O. rufus Keyserling, 1880, O. sanctivincenti (Simon, 1898b), O. similis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890), O. simoni (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890), O. skwarrae Roewer, 1933, O. spinipalpis (Pocock, 1901a), O. stictopus (Pocock, 1898a), O. strandi Kolosváry, 1934, O. subadultus Mello-Leitão, 1930, O. sulphuratus (Thorell, 1899), O. sylvaticus (Blackwall, 1862), O. tamerlani Roewer, 1951, O. tigrinus (Keyserling, 1880), O. trifurcatus (Pocock, 1900c), O. trinitatis Strand, 1916a, O. velox (Simon, 1880), O. ventrosus Nicolet, 1849, O. vitiosus Vellard, 1924 and O. yucatanus Chamberlin, 1925. Seventeen taxa are transferred from Olios to other genera within Sparassidae, eight of them are illustrated: Adcatomus luteus (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Eusparassus flavidus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885) comb. nov., Palystes derasus (C.L. Koch, 1845) comb. nov., Heteropoda similaris (Rainbow, 1898) comb. rev., Remmius variatus (Thorell, 1899) comb. nov., Nolavia audax (Banks, 1909) comb. nov., Nolavia antiguensis (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Nolavia antiguensis columbiensis (Schmidt, 1971) comb. nov., Nolavia fuhrmanni (Strand, 1914) comb. nov., Nolavia helva (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Nolavia stylifer (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900) comb. nov., Nolavia valenciae (Strand, 1916a) comb. nov., Nungara cayana (Taczanowski, 1872) comb. nov., Polybetes bombilius (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1899) comb. nov., Polybetes fasciatus (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Polybetes hyeroglyphicus (Mello-Leitão, 1918) comb. nov. and Prychia paalonga (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov. One species is transferred from Olios to the family Clubionidae Wagner, 1887: Clubiona paenuliformis (Strand, 1916a) comb. nov.

Canon and oblivion. The memorials of archaeologyThe article takes its point of departure in the sun chariot; the find itself and its find site at Trundholm bog where it was discovered in 1902. The famous sun chariot, now at the National Museum in Copenhagen, is a national treasure included in the Danish “Cultural Canon” and “History Canon”.The find site itself has alternated bet­ween experiencing intense attention and oblivion. A monument was erected in 1925; a new monument was then created in 1962 and later moved in 2002. The event of 1962 was followed by ceremonies, speeches and songs, and anniversary celebrations were held in 2002, during which a copy of the sun chariot was sacrificed.The memorial at Trundholm bog is only one of several memorials at archaeological find sites in Denmark. Which finds have been commemorated and marked by memorials? When did this happen? Who took the initiative? How were they executed? Why are these finds remembered? What picture of the past do we meet in this canon in stone?Find sites and archaeological memorials have been neglected in archaeology and by recent trends in the study of the history of archaeology. Considering the impressive research on monuments and monumentality in archaeology, this is astonishing. However, memorials in general receive attention in an active research field on the use of history and heritage studies, where historians and ethnologists dominate. The main focus here is, however, on war memorials. An important source of inspiration has been provided by a project led by the French historian Pierre Nora who claims that memorial sites are established when the living memory is threatened (a thesis refuted by the many Danish “Reunion” monuments erected even before the day of reunification in 1920).Translated into Danish conditions, studies of the culture of remembrance and memorials have focused on the wars of 1848-50 and 1864, the Reunion in 1920, the Occupation in 1940-45 and, more generally, on conflicts in the borderland bet­ween Denmark and Germany.In relation to the total number of memorials and public meeting places in Denmark, archaeological memorials of archaeology are few in number, around 1 % of the total. However, they prompt crucial questions concerning the use of the past, on canon and oblivion.“Canon” means rule, and canonical texts are the supposed genuine texts in the Bible. The concept of canon became a topic in the 1990s when Harold Bloom, in “The Western Canon”, identified a number of books as being canonical. In Denmark, canon has been a great issue in recent years with the appearance of the “Danish Literary Canon” in 2004, and the “Cultural Canon” and the “History Canon”, both in 2006. The latter includes the Ertebølle culture, the sun chariot and the Jelling stone. The political context for the creation of canon lists is the so-called “cultural conflict” and the debate concerning immigration and “foreigners”.Canon and canonization means a struggle against relativism and oblivion. Canon means that something ought to be remembered while something else is allowed to be forgotten. Canon lists are constructed when works and values are perceived as being threatened by oblivion. Without ephemerality and oblivion there is no need for canon lists. Canon and oblivion are linked.Memorials mean canonization of certain individuals, collectives, events and places, while others are allowed to be forgotten. Consequently, archaeological memorials constitute part of the canonization of a few finds and find sites. According to Pierre Nora’s thesis, memorials are established when the places are in danger of being forgotten.Whether one likes canon lists or not, they are a fact. There has always been a process of prioritisation, leading to some finds being preserved and others discarded, some being exhibited and others ending up in the stores.Canonization is expressed in the classical “Seven Wonders of the World”, the “Seven New Wonders of the World” and the World Heritage list. A find may be declared as treasure trove, as being of “unique national significance” or be honoured by the publication of a monograph or by being given its own museum.In practice, the same few finds occur in different contexts. There seems to be a consensus within the subject of canonization of valuing what is well preserved, unique, made of precious metals, bears images and is monumental. A top-ten canon list of prehistoric finds from Denmark according to this consensus would probably include the following finds: The sun chariot from Trundholm, the girl from Egtved, the Dejbjerg carts, the Gundestrup cauldron, Tollund man, the golden horns from Gallehus, the Mammen or Bjerringhøj grave, the Ladby ship and the Skuldelev ships.Just as the past may be used in many different ways, there are many forms of memorial related to monuments from the past or to archaeological excavations. Memorials were constructed in the 18th and 19th centuries at locations where members of the royal family had conducted archaeology. As with most other memorials from that time, the prince is at the centre, while antiquity and archaeology create a brilliant background, for example at Jægerpris (fig. 2). Memorials celebrating King Frederik VII were created at the Dæmpegård dolmen and at the ruin of Asserbo castle. A memorial celebrating Count Frederik Sehested was erected at Møllegårdsmarken (fig. 3). Later there were also memorials celebrating the architect C.M. Smith at the ruin of Kalø Castle and Svend Dyhre Rasmussen and Axel Steensberg, respectively the finder and the excavator of the medieval village at Borup Ris.Several memorials were erected in the decades around 1900 to commemorate important events or persons in Danish history, for example by Thor Lange. The memorials were often located at sites and monuments that had recently been excavated, for example at Fjenneslev (fig. 4).A large number of memorials commemorate abandoned churches, monasteries, castles or barrows that have now disappeared, for example at the monument (fig. 5) near Bjerringhøj.Memorials were erected in the first half of the 20th century near large prehistoric monuments which also functioned as public meeting places, for example at Glavendrup, Gudbjerglund and Hohøj. Prehistoric monuments, especially dolmens, were also used as models when new memorials were created during the 19th and 20th centuries.Finally, sculptures were produced at the end of the 19th century sculptures where the motif was a famous archaeological find – the golden horns, the girl from Egtved, the sun chariot and the woman from Skrydstrup.In the following, this article will focus on a category of memorials raised to commemorate an archaeological find. In Denmark, 24 archaeological find sites have been marked by a total of 26 monuments (fig. 6). This survey is based on excursions, scanning the literature, googling on the web and contact with colleagues. The monuments are presented chronological, i.e. by date of erection. 1-2) The golden horns from Gallehus: Found in 1639 and 1734; two monu­ments in 1907. 3) The Snoldelev runic stone: Found in c. 1780; monument in 1915. 4) The sun chariot from Trundholm bog: Found in 1902; monument in 1925; renewed in 1962 and moved in 2002. 5) The grave mound from Egtved: Found in 1921; monument in 1930. 6) The Dejbjerg carts. Found in 1881-83; monument in 1933. 7) The Gundestrup cauldron: Found in 1891; wooden stake in 1934; replaced with a monument in 1935. 8) The Bregnebjerg burial ground: Found in 1932; miniature dolmen in 1934. 9) The Brangstrup gold hoard. Found in 1865; monument in 1935.10-11) Maglemose settlements in Mulle­rup bog: Found in 1900-02; two monuments in 1935 and 1936. 12) The Skarpsalling vessel from Oudrup Heath: Found in 1891; monument in 1936. 13) The Juellinge burial ground: Found in 1909; monument in 1937. 14) The Ladby ship: Found in 1935; monument probably in 1937. 15) The Hoby grave: Found in 1920; monument in 1939. 16) The Maltbæk lurs: Found in 1861 and 1863; monument in 1942. 17) Ginnerup settlement: First excavation in 1922; monument in 1945. 18) The golden boats from Nors: Found in 1885; monument in 1945. 19) The Sædinge runic stone: Found in 1854; monument in 1945. 20) The Nydam boat: Found in 1863; monument in 1947. 21) The aurochs from Vig: Found in 1904; monument in 1957. 22) Tollund Man: Found in 1950; wooden stake in 1968; renewed inscription in 2000. 23) The Veksø helmets: Found in 1942; monument in 1992. 24) The Bjæverskov coin hoard. Found in 1999; monument in 1999. 25) The Frydenhøj sword from Hvidovre: Found in 1929; monument in 2001; renewed in 2005. 26) The Bellinge key: Found in 1880; monument in 2003.Two monuments (fig. 7) raised in 1997 at Gallehus, where the golden horns were found, marked a new trend. From then onwards the find itself and its popular finders came into focus. At the same time the classical or old Norse style of the memorials was replaced by simple menhirs or boulders with an inscription and sometimes also an image of the find. One memorial was constructed as a miniature dolmen and a few took the form of a wooden stake.The finds marked by memorials represent a broader spectrum than the top-ten list. They represent all periods from the Stone Age to the Middle Ages over most of Denmark. Memorials were created throughout the 20th century; in greatest numbers in the 1930s and 1940s, but with none between 1968 and 1992.The inscriptions mention what was found and, in most cases, also when it happened. Sometimes the finder is named and, in a few instances, also the person on whose initiative the memorial was erected. The latter was usually a representative part of the political agency of the time. In the 18th and 19th centuries it was the royal family and the aristocracy. In the 20th century it was workers, teachers, doctors, priests, farmers and, in many cases, local historical societies who were responsible, as seen on the islands of Lolland and Falster, where ten memorials were erected between 1936 and 1951 to commemorate historical events, individuals, monuments or finds.The memorial from 2001 at the find site of the Frydenhøj sword in Hvidovre represents an innovation in the tradition of marking history in the landscape. The memorial is a monumental hybrid between signposting and public art (fig. 8). It formed part of a communication project called “History in the Street”, which involved telling the history of a Copenhagen suburb right there where it actually happened.The memorials marking archaeological finds relate to the nation and to nationalism in several ways. The monuments at Gallehus should, therefore, be seen in the context of a struggle concerning both the historical allegiance and future destiny of Schleswig or Southern Jutland. More generally, the national perspective occurs in inscriptions using concepts such as “the people”, “Denmark” and “the Danes”, even if these were irrelevant in prehistory, e.g. when the monument from 1930 at Egtved mentions “A young Danish girl” (fig. 9). This use of the past to legitimise the nation, belongs to the epoch of World War I, World War II and the 1930s. The influence of nationalism was often reflected in the ceremonies when the memorials were unveiled, with speeches, flags and songs.According to Marie Louise Stig Sørensen and Inge Adriansen, prehistoric objects that are applicable as national symbols, should satisfy three criteria. The should: 1) be unusual and remarkable by their technical and artistic quality; 2) have been produced locally, i.e. be Danish; 3) have been used in religious ceremonies or processions. The 26 archaeological finds marked with memorials only partly fit these criteria. The finds also include more ordinary finds: a burial ground, settlements, runic stones, a coin hoard, a sword and a key. Several of the finds were produced abroad: the Gundestrup cauldron, the Brangstrup jewellery and coins and the Hoby silver cups.It is tempting to interpret the Danish cultural canon as a new expression of a national use of the past in the present. Nostalgia, the use of the past and the creation of memorials are often explained as an expression of crisis in society. This seems reasonable for the many memorials from 1915-45 with inscriptions mentioning hope, consolation and darkness. However, why are there no memorials from the economic crisis years of the 1970s and 1980s? It seems as if the past is recalled, when the nation is under threat – in the 1930s and 40s from expansive Germany – and since the 1990s by increased immigration and globalisation.The memorials have in common local loss and local initiative. A treasure was found and a treasure was lost, often to the National Museum in Copenhagen. A treasure was won that contributed to the great narrative of the history of Denmark, but that treasure has also left its original context. The memorials commemorate the finds that have contributed to the narrative of the greatness, age and area of Denmark. The memorials connect the nation and the native place, the capital and the village in a community, where the past is a central concept. The find may also become a symbol of a region or community, for example the sun chariot for Trundholm community and the Gundestrup cauldron for Himmerland.It is almost always people who live near the find site who want to remember what has been found and where. The finds were commemorated by a memorial on average 60 years after their discovery. A longer period elapsed for the golden horns from Gallehus; shortest was at Bjæverskov where the coin hoard was found in March 1999 and a monument was erected in November of the same year.Memorials might seem an old-fashioned way of marking localities in a national topography, but new memorials are created in the same period as many new museums are established.A unique find has no prominent role in archaeological education, research or other work. However, in public opinion treasures and exotic finds are central. Folklore tells of people searching for treasures but always failing. Treasure hunting is restricted by taboos. In the world of archaeological finds there are no taboos. The treasure is found by accident and in spite of various hindrances the find is taken to a museum. The finder is often a worthy person – a child, a labourer or peasant. He or she is an innocent and ordinary person. A national symbol requires a worthy finder. And the find occurs as a miracle. At the find site a romantic relationship is established between the ancestors and their heirs who, by way of a miracle, find fragments of the glorious past of the nation. A paradigmatic example is the finding of the golden horns from Gallehus. Other examples extend from the discovery of the sun chariot in Trundholm bog to the Stone Age settlement at Mullerup bog.The article ends with a catalogue presenting the 24 archaeological find sites that have been marked with monuments in present-day Denmark.Jes WienbergHistorisk arkeologiInstitutionen för Arkeologi och ­Antikens historiaLunds Universitet

Changes to the treatment of Coleoptera family-group names published by Bouchard et al. (2011) are given. These include necessary additions and corrections based on much-appreciated suggestions from our colleagues, as well as our own research. Our ultimate goal is to assemble a complete list of available Coleoptera family-group names published up to the end of 2010 (including information about their spelling, author, year of publication, and type genus). The following 59 available Coleoptera family-group names are based on type genera not included in Bouchard et al. (2011): Prothydrinae Guignot, 1954, Aulonogyrini Ochs, 1953 (Gyrinidae); Pogonostomini Mandl 1954, Merismoderini Wasmann, 1929, †Escheriidae Kolbe, 1880 (Carabidae); Timarchopsinae Wang, Ponomarenko & Zhang, 2010 (Coptoclavidae); Stictocraniini Jakobson, 1914 (Staphylinidae); Cylindrocaulini Zang, 1905, Kaupiolinae Zang, 1905 (Passalidae); Phaeochroinae Kolbe, 1912 (Hybosoridae); Anthypnidae Chalande, 1884 (Glaphyridae); Comophorini Britton, 1957, Comophini Britton, 1978, Chasmidae Streubel, 1846, Mimelidae Theobald, 1882, Rhepsimidae Streubel, 1846, Ometidae Streubel, 1846, Jumnidae Burmeister, 1842, Evambateidae Gistel, 1856 (Scarabaeidae); Protelmidae Jeannel, 1950 (Byrrhoidea); Pseudeucinetini Csiki, 1924 (Limnichidae); Xylotrogidae Schönfeldt, 1887 (Bostrichidae); †Mesernobiinae Engel, 2010, Fabrasiinae Lawrence & Reichardt, 1966 (Ptinidae); Arhinopini Kirejtshuk & Bouchard, 2018 (Nitidulidae); Hypodacninae Dajoz, 1976, Ceuthocera Mannerheim, 1852 (Cerylonidae); Symbiotinae Joy, 1932 (Endomychidae); Cheilomenini Schilder & Schilder, 1928, Veraniini Schilder & Schilder, 1928 (Coccinellidae); Ennearthroninae Chûjô, 1939 (Ciidae); Curtimordini Odnosum, 2010, Mordellochroini Odnosum, 2010 (Mordellidae); Chanopterinae Borchmann, 1915 (Promecheilidae); Heptaphyllini Prudhomme de Borre, 1886, Olocratarii Baudi di Selve, 1875, Opatrinaires Mulsant & Rey, 1853, Telacianae Poey, 1854, Ancylopominae Pascoe, 1871 (Tenebrionidae); Oxycopiini Arnett, 1984 (Oedemeridae); Eutrypteidae Gistel, 1856 (Mycteridae); Pogonocerinae Iablokoff-Khnzorian, 1985 (Pyrochroidae); Amblyderini Desbrochers des Loges, 1899 (Anthicidae); Trotommideini Pic, 1903 (Scraptiidae); Acmaeopsini Della Beffa, 1915, Trigonarthrini Villiers, 1984, Eunidiini Téocchi, Sudre & Jiroux, 2010 (Cerambycidae); Macropleini Lopatin, 1977, Stenopodiides Horn, 1883, Microrhopalides Horn, 1883, Colaphidae Siegel, 1866, Lexiphanini Wilcox, 1954 (Chrysomelidae); †Medmetrioxenoidesini Legalov, 2010, †Megametrioxenoidesini Legalov, 2010 (Nemonychidae); Myrmecinae Tanner, 1966, Tapinotinae Joy, 1932, Acallinae Joy, 1932, Cycloderini Hoffmann, 1950, Sthereini Hatch, 1971 (Curculionidae). The following 21 family-group names, listed as unavailable in Bouchard et al. (2011), are determined to be available: Eohomopterinae Wasmann, 1929 (Carabidae); Prosopocoilini Benesh, 1960, Pseudodorcini Benesh, 1960, Rhyssonotini Benesh, 1960 (Lucanidae); Galbini Beaulieu, 1919 (Eucnemidae); Troglopates Mulsant & Rey, 1867 (Melyridae); Hippodamiini Weise, 1885 (Coccinellidae); Micrositates Mulsant & Rey, 1854, Héliopathaires Mulsant & Rey, 1854 (Tenebrionidae); Hypasclerini Arnett, 1984; Oxaciini Arnett, 1984 (Oedemeridae); Stilpnonotinae Borchmann, 1936 (Mycteridae); Trogocryptinae Lawrence, 1991 (Salpingidae); Grammopterini Della Beffa, 1915, Aedilinae Perrier, 1893, Anaesthetinae Perrier, 1893 (Cerambycidae); Physonotitae Spaeth, 1942, Octotomides Horn, 1883 (Chrysomelidae); Sympiezopinorum Faust, 1886, Sueinae Murayama, 1959, Eccoptopterini Kalshoven, 1959 (Curculionidae). The following names were proposed as new without reference to family-group names based on the same type genus which had been made available at an earlier date: Dineutini Ochs, 1926 (Gyrinidae); Odonteini Shokhin, 2007 (Geotrupidae); Fornaxini Cobos, 1965 (Eucnemidae); Auletobiina Legalov, 2001 (Attelabidae). The priority of several family-group names, listed as valid in Bouchard et al. (2011), is affected by recent bibliographic discoveries or new nomenclatural interpretations. †Necronectinae Ponomarenko, 1977 is treated as permanently invalid and replaced with †Timarchopsinae Wang, Ponomarenko & Zhang, 2010 (Coptoclavidae); Agathidiini Westwood, 1838 is replaced by the older name Anisotomini Horaninow, 1834 (Staphylinidae); Cyrtoscydmini Schaufuss, 1889 is replaced by the older name Stenichnini Fauvel, 1885 (Staphylinidae); Eremazinae Iablokoff-Khnzorian, 1977 is treated as unavailable and replaced with Eremazinae Stebnicka, 1977 (Scarabaeidae); Coryphocerina Burmeister, 1842 is replaced by the older name Rhomborhinina Westwood, 1842 (Scarabaeidae); Eudysantina Bouchard, Lawrence, Davies & Newton, 2005 is replaced by the older name Dysantina Gebien, 1922 which is not permanently invalid (Tenebrionidae). The names Macraulacinae/-ini Fleutiaux, 1923 (Eucnemidae), Anamorphinae Strohecker, 1953 (Endomychidae), Pachycnemina Laporte, 1840 (Scarabaeidae), Thaumastodinae Champion, 1924 (Limnichidae), Eudicronychinae Girard, 1971 (Elateridae), Trogoxylini Lesne, 1921 (Bostrichidae), Laemophloeidae Ganglbauer, 1899 (Laemophloeidae); Ancitini Aurivillius, 1917 (Cerambycidae) and Tropiphorini Marseul, 1863 (Curculionidae) are threatened by the discovery of older names; Reversal of Precedence (ICZN 1999: Art. 23.9) or an application to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature will be necessary to retain usage of the younger synonyms. Reversal of Precedence is used herein to qualify the following family-group names as nomina protecta: Murmidiinae Jacquelin du Val, 1858 (Cerylonidae) and Chalepini Weise, 1910 (Chrysomelidae). The following 17 Coleoptera family-group names (some of which are used as valid) are homonyms of other family-group names in zoology, these cases must be referred to the Commission for a ruling to remove the homonymy: Catiniidae Ponomarenko, 1968 (Catiniidae); Homopterinae Wasmann, 1920, Glyptini Horn, 1881 (Carabidae); Tychini Raffray, 1904, Ocypodina Hatch, 1957 (Staphylinidae); Gonatinae Kuwert, 1891 (Passalidae); Aplonychidae Burmeister, 1855 (Scarabaeidae); Microchaetini Paulus, 1973 (Byrrhidae); Epiphanini Muona, 1993 (Eucnemidae); Limoniina Jakobson, 1913 (Elateridae); Ichthyurini Champion, 1915 (Cantharidae); Decamerinae Crowson, 1964 (Trogossitidae); Trichodidae Streubel, 1839 (Cleridae); Monocorynini Miyatake, 1988 (Coccinellidae); Gastrophysina Kippenberg, 2010, Chorinini Weise, 1923 (Chrysomelidae); Meconemini Pierce, 1930 (Anthribidae). The following new substitute names are proposed: Phoroschizus (to replace Schizophorus Ponomarenko, 1968) and Phoroschizidae (to replace Schizophoridae Ponomarenko, 1968); Mesostyloides (to replace Mesostylus Faust, 1894) and Mesostyloidini (to replace Mesostylini Reitter, 1913). The following new genus-group name synonyms are proposed [valid names in square brackets]: Plocastes Gistel, 1856 [Aesalus Fabricius, 1801] (Lucanidae); Evambates Gistel, 1856 [Trichius Fabricius, 1775] (Scarabaeidae); Homoeoplastus Gistel, 1856 [Byturus Latreille, 1797] (Byturidae). Two type genera previously treated as preoccupied and invalid, Heteroscelis Latreille, 1828 and Dysantes Pascoe, 1869 (Tenebrionidae), are determined to be senior homonyms based on bibliographical research. While Dysantes is treated as valid here, Reversal of Precedence (ICZN 1999: Art. 23.9) is used to conserve usage of Anomalipus Guérin-Méneville, 1831 over Heteroscelis.

Interference of esotericism and politics became apparent especially in the 19th century when the early socialists expected the coming of the Age of Spirit, and narratives about secret wisdom being kept in mysterious sacred places became all the more popular. Thus, the idea of the Age of Enlightenment underwent transformation: the world will be saved not by ordinary knowledge but by some special secret wisdom. In this context, Helena Blavatsky (1831–1891) developed the doctrine of Theosophy the ideas of which were overtaken by the next-generation theosophists including also the Russian painter Nicholas Roerich (1874–1947) and his spouse Helena Roerich (1879–1955) who developed a new form of Theosophy. The aim of this article is to analyse the interference between Theosophy and politics paying special attention to its historical roots, which, in the context of Roerich groups, are to be sought in the political activities of Nicholas Roerich, the founder of the movement. The following materials have been used in the analysis: first, writings of the founders of Agni Yoga or Teaching of Living Ethics; second, the latest studies in the history of Theosophy made in the available archives after the collapse of the soviet regime; third, materials obtained from the interviews of a field research (2006–2008). The author has made use of an interdisciplinary approach combining anthropological methods with the method of systematic analysis. The historical roots of the political activity of contemporary theosophists stretch into the political aspirations of Nicholas Roerich, the founder of Agni Yoga or Teaching of Living Ethics. Opening of the USSR secret archives and publication of several formerly inaccessible diaries and letters of theosophists offer an opportunity to study the “spiritual geopolitics” of the Roerichs. Setting off to his Central Asian expeditions (1925–1928; 1934–1935), Nicholas Roerich strived to implement the Great Plan, i.e. to found a New State that would stretch from Tibet to South Siberia comprising the territories governed by China, Mongolia, Tibet and the USSR. The new state was conceived as the kingdom of Shambhala on the earth, and in order to form this state, Nicholas Roerich aspired to acquire the support of various political systems. During the Tzarist Empire, the political world outlook of Nicholas Roerich was markedly monarchic. After the Bolshevik coup in Russia, the artist accepted the offer to work under the wing of the new power, but after his emigration to the West Roerich published extremely sharp articles against the Bolsheviks. In 1922, the Roerichs started to support Lenin considering him the messenger of Shambhala. Roerich’s efforts to acquire Bolshevik support culminated in 1926 when the Roerichs arrived in Moscow bringing a message by Mahatmas to the soviet government, a small case with earth for the Lenin Mausoleum from Burhan-Bulat and paintings in which Buddha Maitreya bore strong resemblance to Lenin. The plan of founding the Union of Eastern Republics, with Bolshevik support, failed, since about the year 1930 the soviet authorities changed their position concerning the politics of the Far East. Having ascertained that the Bolsheviks would not provide the anticipated support for the Great Plan, the Roerichs started to seek for contacts in the USA which provided funding for his second expedition (1934–1935). The Roerichs succeeded even in making correspondence (1934–1936) with President Roosevelt who paid much larger attention to Eastern states especially China than other presidents did. Their correspondence ceased when the Security Service of the USA grew suspicious about Roerich’s pro-Japanese disposition. Nicholas Roerich has sought for support to his political ambitions by all political regimes. In 1934, the Russian artist tried to ascertain whether German national socialists would support his efforts in Asia. It may seem that the plans of founding the Union of Oriental Republics have passed away along with Roerich; yet in 1991 his son Svyatoslav Roerich (1904–1993) pointed out once again that the Altai is a very important centre of the great future and Zvenigorod is still a great reality and a magnificent dream. Interference between esotericism and politics is observed also among Latvian theosophists: the soviet regime successfully made use of Roerich’s adherents propagating the communist ideology in the independent Republic of Latvia. In the 1920s and 1930s, the embassy of the USSR in Riga maintained close contacts with Roerich’s adherents in Latvia and made a strong pressure on the Latvian government not to ban the Roerich’s Museum Friend Society who actively propagated the success of soviet culture and economy. On 17 June 1940, the soviet army occupied the Republic of Latvia, and Haralds Lūkins, the son of the founder of the Roerich’s Museum Friend Society, was elected to the first government of the soviet Latvia. Nevertheless, involvement of theosophists in politics was unsuccessful, since after the official annexation of Latvia into the USSR, on 5 August 1940, all societies including the Roerich’s Museum Friend Society were closed. Since the members of the movement continued to meet regularly, in 1949, Haralds Lūkins was arrested as leader of an illegal organization. After the Second World War, theosophists were subjected to political repressions. Arrests of Roerich’s followers (1948–1951) badly impaired the movement. After rehabilitation in 1954, the repressed persons gradually returned from exile and kept on their illegal meetings in small groups. To regain their rights to act openly, Roerich’s followers started to praise Nicholas Roerich as a supporter of the soviet power. With the collapse of the soviet regime, Roerich’s followers in Latvia became legal in 1988 when the Latvian Roerich Society was restored which soon split up according to geopolitical orientation; therefore, presently in Latvia, there are the following organisations: Latvian Roerich Society, Latvian Department of the International Centre of the Roerichs, and Aivars Garda group or the Latvian National Front. A. Garda fused nationalistic ideas with Theosophy offering a special social reorganization – repatriation of the soviet-time immigrants and a social structure of Latvia that would be formed by at least 75% ethnic Latvians. Activity of A. Garda group, which is being criticized by other groups of theosophists, is a continuation of the interference between theosophical and political ideas practised by the Roerichs. Generally it is to be admitted that after the crush of the soviet regime, in theosophist groups, unclear political orientation between the rightists and leftists is observed, characterised by fairly radical ideas.

RESUMENDesde hace siglos el cristianismo ha concebido que la vestimenta es un elemento casi definitorio de la calidad moral y de la religiosidad de las personas que la portan. Durante el primer tercio del siglo xx, el catolicismo español estuvo muy preocupado por la evolución de las modas femeninas modernas. Entendía que estas modas eran indecentes e inmorales, además de un símbolo del desorden social, del desmoronamiento general de las costumbres y de la descristianización de la sociedad. Los argumentos que los sectores católicos españoles utilizaron en contra de las modas modernas femeninas fueron muy variados. Entre ellos, destacaron la noción de que las mujeres que utilizaban este tipo de vestimentas iban desnudas, deslegitimaban la lucha por la ampliación de derechos de las mujeres, generaban una crisis en los matrimonios o se extranjerizaban. El trabajo está basado en fuentes primarias y secundarias. La mayor parte de los planteamientos se han extraído de las fuentes hemerográficas, y se ha dado especial protagonismo a las opiniones que sobre este asunto tuvieron algunas de las mujeres católicas más destacadas del periodo. Palabras clave: mujeres, género, vestimenta, religiónTopónimos: EspañaPeriodo: primer tercio del siglo xx ABSTRACTFor centuries the Christian Churches have conceived the clothing as an almost defining element of the moral quality and religiosity of its wearers. During the first third of the 20th century Spanish Catholicism was very concerned about the evolution of women’s clothes. They understood that modern clothes were indecent and immoral, a symbol of social disorder, of the general collapse of customs and the de-Christianization of society. Spanish Catholicism used several arguments to fight against modern feminine fashions. For example, they highlighted the notion that women who used this type of clothing were in fact naked; meanwhile they delegitimized the fight for the expansion of women’s rights, generated a crisis in the marriages and made Spanish women lose their national characteristics. The work is based on primary and secondary sources. Most of the opinions have been taken from newspapers. Special prominence has been given to the approaches defended by some of the most prominent Catholic women of the period. Keywords: women, gender, clothing, religionPlace names: SpainPeriod: first third of the 20th century REFERENCIASArce, R. (2016): La construcción social de la mujer por el catolicismo y las derechas españolas en la época contemporánea, Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Cantabria.Aresti, N. (2001): Médicos, donjuanes y mujeres modernas. Los ideales de feminidad y masculinidad en la España del primer tercio del siglo xx, Bilbao, Universidad del País Vasco.— (2002): “La nueva mujer sexual y el varón domesticado. El movimiento liberal para la reforma de la sexualidad (1920-1936)”, Arenal, 9, pp. 125-150. — (2018): “La peligrosa naturaleza de Don Juan. Sexualidad masculina y orden social en la España de entreguerras”, Cuadernos de historia contemporánea, 40, pp. 13-31.Arroyo Martín, C. (2017): La Moda Elegante Ilustrada en el periodo de entreguerras (1918-1927): análisis documental, Tesis doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Blasco, I. (1997): “Moda e Imágenes Femeninas durante el Primer Franquismo: entre la Moralidad Católica y las Nuevas Identidades de Mujer”, Utopía y praxis latinoamericana, 2, pp. 83-93.— (2003): Paradojas de la ortodoxia. Política de masas y militancia católica femenina en España (1919-1939), Zaragoza, Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.— (2005): “Género y religión: de la feminización de la religión a la movilización católica femenina. Una revisión crítica”, Historia Social, 53, pp. 119-136.Courtine, J. J., Alain Corbin y Georges Vigarello (2005): Historia del cuerpo, Taurus.Díaz Freire, J. J. (1999): “La reforma de la vida cotidiana y el cuerpo femenino durante la dictadura de Primo de Rivera”, en Luis Castells (ed.): El rumor de lo cotidiano. Estudios sobre el País Vasco Contemporáneo, Bilbao, Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 225-257.Díaz Marcos, A. M. (2020): “Corazas estrafalarias: moda, corsés y feminismo en el cambio de siglo”, Indumenta: Revista del Museo del Traje, 3, pp. 23-39.Dwyer-Mcnulty, S. (2014): Common Threads: A Cultural History of Clothing in American Catholicism, Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.Echarri, M. (1915): Más poderoso que el amor, Barcelona, Imprenta Editorial Barcelonesa.— (1927): El que siembra con lágrimas…, Valencia, La novela hispano-americana.Gutiérrez García, M. A. (2005): “Literatura y moda: la indumentaria femenina a través de la novela española del siglo xix”, Tonos digital: Revista de estudios filológicos, 9, s/p. Lannon, F. (1999): “Los cuerpos de las mujeres y el cuerpo político católico: autoridades e identidades en conflicto en España durante las décadas de 1920 y 1930”, Historia social, 35, pp. 65-80.Llona, M. (2002): Entre señorita y garçonne: historia oral de las mujeres bilbaínas de clase media, (1919-1939), Málaga, Universidad de Málaga.— (2007): “Los otros cuerpos disciplinados: relaciones de género y estrategias de autocontrol del cuerpo femenino (primer tercio del siglo xx)”, Arenal, 14, pp. 79-108.— (2020): “Recordar el porvenir: las mujeres modernas y el desorden de género en los años veinte y treinta”, Arenal, 27, pp. 5-32.Louzao, J. (2010): Identidad, catolicismo y modernización en la Vizcaya de la restauración (1890-1923), Tesis doctoral, UPV/EHU.Martínez Sierra, G. (1917): Feminismo, feminidad, españolismo, Madrid, Renacimiento.Mauro, D. (2014): “La Mujer Católica y la sociedad de masas en la Argentina de entreguerras. Catolicismo social, consumo e industria cultural en la ciudad de Rosario (1915-1940)”, Hispania Sacra, 133, pp. 235-262.Mínguez, R. (2015): “¿Dios cambió de sexo? El debate internacional sobre la feminización de la religión y algunas reflexiones para la España decimonónica”, Historia contemporánea, 51, pp. 397-426. Monlleó, R. (2006): “Moda y ocio en los felices años veinte. La maternidad moral de las mujeres católicas en Castellón”. Asparkía, 17, pp. 197-228. Otero-González, U. (2021): “Catholic Dressing in the Spanish Franco Dictatorship (1939–1975): Normative Femininity and Its Sartorial Embodiment”, Journal of Religious History, 45, 4, pp. 582-602.Perales, M. y María Echarri (1944 [1915]): Redención, Madrid, Editorial Stylos, Pérez del Puerto, Á. (2021): Católicas de posguerra en acción. El discurso de género de Acción Católica en España y en Estados Unidos, Granada, Comares.—(2021): “Moda se escribe con m de moralidad. Identidad transnacional de la feminidad en los cuarenta a través del control del vestir por las mujeres de Acción Católica”, en José Ramón Rodríguez Lago y Natalia Núñez Bargueño (eds.), Madrid, Sílex, pp. 365-389.Sánchez Pinilla, F. (2016): La narración para niños: autoras, circuitos y textos en el cambio del siglo xix al xx, Tesis Doctoral, Universitat de València.Velasco Molpeceres, A. M. (2016): Moda y prensa femenina en la España del siglo xix, Madrid, Ediciones 19. — (2021): Historia de la moda en España: de la mantilla al bikini, Los Libros de la Catarata.Villanueva Cobo del Prado, M. (2016): La moda femenina en las publicaciones periódicas: Blanco y Negro 1891-1910, Tesis doctoral, Universitat de València.

People live amidst objects, things, articles, items, artefacts, materials, substances, and stuff – described in social sciences and humanities as material culture, which denotes both natural and human-made entities, which form our physical environment. We, humans, relate to this environment by using, depicting, interacting with or thinking about various material objects or their representations. In other words, material culture is never just about things in themselves, it is also about various ideas, representations, experiences, practices and relations. In contemporary theorising about material culture, the watershed between the tangible and intangible has started to disappear as all the objects have multiple meanings. This paper theorises objects mostly in terms of contemporary socio-cultural anthropology and ethnology by first giving an overview of the development of the material culture studies and then focusing upon consumption studies, material agency, practice theory and the methods for studying material culture. Both anthropology and ethnology in the beginning of the 20th century were dealing mostly with ‘saving’; that is, collecting the ethnographical objects from various cultures for future preservation as societies modernised. The collecting of the everyday items of rural Estonians, which had begun in the 19th century during the period of national awakening, gained its full momentum after the establishment of the Estonian National Museum in 1909. During the museum’s first ten years, 20,000 objects were collected (Õunapuu 2007). First, the focus was on the identification of the historical-geographical typologies of the collected artefacts. In 1919, the first Estonian with a degree in ethnology, Helmi Reiman-Neggo (2013) stressed the need for ethnographical descriptions of the collected items and the theoretical planning of the museum collections. The resulting vast ethnographical collection of the Estonian National Museum (currently about 140,000 items) has also largely influenced ethnology and anthropology as academic disciplines in Estonia (Pärdi 1993). Even though in the first half of the 20th century the focus lay in the systematic collection and comparative analysis of everyday items and folk art, there were studies that centred on meaning already at the end of 19th century. Austrianethnologist Rudolf Meringer suggested in 1891 that a house should be studied as a cultural individual and analysed within the context of its functions and in relation to its inhabitants. Similarly, the 1920s and 1930s saw studies on the roles of artefacts that were not influenced by Anglo-American functionalism: Mathilde Hain (1936) studied how folk costumes contribute to the harmonious functioning of a ‘small community’, and Petr Bogatyrev (1971) published his study on Moravian costumes in 1937. This study, determining the three main functions – instrumental, aesthetic and symbolic – of the folk costume, and translated into English 30 years after first publication, had a substantial influence on the development of material culture studies. The 1970s saw the focus of material culture studies in Western and Northern Europe shifting mainly from the examination of (historical) rural artefacts to the topics surrounding contemporary culture, such as consumption. In Soviet Estonian ethnology, however, the focus on the 19th century ethnographic items was prevalent until the 1980s as the topic was also partially perceived as a protest against the direction of Soviet academia (see Annist and Kaaristo 2013 for a thorough overview). There were, of course, exceptions, as for instance Arved Luts’s (1962) studies on everyday life on collective farms. Meanwhile, however, the communicative and semiotic turn of the 1970s turned European ethnology’s focus to the idea of representation and objects as markers of identity as well as means of materialising the otherwise intangible and immaterial relationships and relations. The theory of cultural communication was established in Scandinavian ethnology and numerous studies on clothing, housing and everyday items as material expressions of social structures, hierarchies, values and ideologies emerged (Lönnqvist 1979, Gustavsson 1991). The Scandinavian influences on Estonia are also reflected in Ants Viires’s (1990) suggestion that ethnologists should study clothing (including contemporary clothing) in general and not just folk costumes, by using a semiotic approach. Löfgren’s (1997) clarion call to bring more ‘flesh and blood’ to the study of material culture was a certain reaction to the above focus. Researchers had for too long focused exclusively upon the meaning and, as Löfgren brought forth, they still did not have enough understanding of what exactly it was that people were actually and practically doing with their things. Ingold’s (2013) criticism on the studies focusing on symbolism, and the lack of studies on the tangible materiality of the materials and their properties, takes a similar position. In the 1990s, there was a turn toward the examination of material-cultural and those studies that were written within the framework of ‘new materialism’ (Hicks 2010, Coole and Frost 2010) started to pay attention to objects as embodied and agentive (Latour 1999, Tilley et al 2006). Nevertheless, as Olsen (2017) notes, all materialities are not created equal in contemporary academic research: while items like prostheses, Boyle’s air pumps or virtual realities enjoy increased attention, objects such as wooden houses, fireplaces, rakes and simple wooden chairs are still largely unexamined. The traditional material culture therefore needs new studying in the light of these post-humanist theories. Where does this leave Estonian ethnology? In the light of the theoretical developments discussed above, we could ask, whether and how has the material Making sense of the material culture turn affected research in Estonia? Here we must first note that for a significant part of the 20th century, Estonian ethnology (or ethnography as the discipline was called before 1990s) has mostly been centred on the material culture (see the overview of the main topics from vehicles to folk costumes in Viires and Vunder 2008). Partly because of this aspect of the discipline’s history, many researchers actually felt the need to somewhat distance themselves from these topics in the 1990s (Pärdi 1998). Compared to topics like religion, identity, memory, oral history and intangible heritage, study of material culture has largely stayed in the background. There are of course notable exceptions such as Vunder’s (1992) study on the history of style, which includes analysis of theirsymbolic aspects. It is also interesting to note that in the 1990s Estonian ethnology, the term ‘material culture’ (‘materiaalne kultuur’) – then seen as incorporating the dualism between material and immaterial – was actually replaced with the Estonian translation of German ‘Sachkultur’ (‘esemekultuur’, literally ‘artefact culture’). Nevertheless, it was soon realised that this was actually a too narrow term (with its exclusion of natural objects and phenomena as well as the intangible and social aspects of culture), slowly fell out of general usage, and was replaced with ‘material culture’ once again. Within the past three decades, studies dealing with material culture have discussed a wide variety of topics from the vernacular interior design (Kannike 2000, 2002, 2012), everyday commodities (Kõresaar 1999b) and spiritual objects (Teidearu 2019), traditional rural architecture (Pärdi 2012, Kask 2012, 2015), museum artefacts (Leete 1996), clothing, textiles and jewellery (Kõresaar 1999a; Järs 2004; Summatavet 2005; Jõeste 2012; Araste and Ventsel 2015), food culture (Piiri 2006; Bardone 2016; Kannike and Bardone 2017), to soviet consumer culture (Ruusmann 2006, Rattus 2013) and its implications in life histories (Kõresaar 1998, Jõesalu and Nugin 2017). All of these these studies deal with how people interpret, remember and use objects. The main keywords of the studies of European material culture have been home, identity and consumption (but also museology and tangible heritage, which have not been covered in this article). Material culture studies are an important part of the studies of everyday life and here social and cultural histories are still important (even though they have been criticised for focusing too much on symbols and representation). Therefore, those studies focusing on physical materials and materialites, sensory experiences, embodiment, and material agency have recently become more and more important. This article has given an overview of the three most prevalent thematic and theoretical strands of the study of material culture: objects as symbols especially in the consumer culture, material agency and practice theory as well as discussing some methodological suggestions for the material culture studies. To conclude, even though on the one hand we could argue that when it comes to the study of material culture there indeed exists a certain hierarchy of „old“ topics that relate to museums or traditional crafts and „new“ and modern materialities, such as smart phones or genetically modified organisms. However, dichotomies like this are often artificial and do not show the whole picture: contemporary children are often as proficient in playing cat’s cradle as they are with video games (Jackson 2016). Thus, studying various (everyday) material objects and entities is still topical and the various theories discussed in this article can help to build both theoretical and empirical bridge between different approaches. Therefore, there is still a lot to do in this regard and we invite researchers to study objects form all branches of material culture, be they 19th century beer mugs in the collections of the Estonian National Museum that can help us to better give meaning to our past, or the digital and virtual design solutions that can give our academic research an applied direction. Keywords: material culture, artefacts, consumption, practice, agency, research methods