Gotowe bibliografie tematyczne / Trinitarian God of evolution

Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Trinitarian God of evolution”

Autor: Grafiati
Data publikacji: 4 czerwca 2021
Data aktualizacji: 12 lutego 2022

Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych

Wybierz rodzaj źródła:

Spis treści

Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Trinitarian God of evolution”.

Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.

Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.

Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Trinitarian God of evolution"

1

Honner, John. "Book Review: The God of Evolution: A Trinitarian Theology". Pacifica: Australasian Theological Studies 14, nr 1 (luty 2001): 103–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1030570x0101400115.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
2

Delio, Ilia. "Trinitizing the Universe: Teilhard’s Theogenesis and the Dynamism of Love". Open Theology 4, nr 1 (1.02.2018): 158–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0011.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
Abstract The God-world relationship bears an ambiguous relationship between God’s immanent life and God’s life in history. The development of the doctrine of the Trinity in the early Church gave rise to a distinction between theologia and oikonomia. Bonaventure’s theology sought to express an economic trinitarianism without compromising the integrity of God’s life, thus maintaining divine immutability and divine impassibility. Twentieth century trinitarian theologies challenge the notion of divine immutability in light of modern science and radical suffering. This paper develops on the heels of twentieth century theology by focusing in particular on the philosophical shifts rendered by modern science and technology. In particular, the insights of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin are explored with regard to Trinity and evolution, precisely because Teilhard intuited that evolution and the new physics evoke a radically new understanding of God. Building on Teilhard’s insights, I suggest that divine creative love is expressed in a fourth mystery which Teilhard called ‟pleromization.” Pleromization is the outflow of divine creative union or, literally, God filling the universe with divine life. Teilhard recapitulates this idea in the evolution of Christ so that theologia and oikonomia are one movement of divine love. My principal thesis is that the Trinity is integrally related to the world; the fullness of divine love includes the personalization of created reality, symbolized by the Christ. To explore this thesis I draw upon the cyborg as the symbol of hybridization and permeable boundaries and interpret Trinitarian life in evolution as cyborg Christogensis. Using the Law of Three, I indicate why a new understanding of Trinitarian life involves complexification and thus a new understanding of Trinity in which the fullness of divine life includes created reality.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
3

Rubbelke, Michael. "Reading Rahner’s Evolutionary Christology with Bonaventure". Philosophy and Theology 30, nr 2 (2018): 507–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtheol201862093.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
In his evolutionary Christology, Karl Rahner shares some surprising affinities with Bonaventure. Both envision human beings as microcosmic, that is, as uniquely representative of the whole of creation. Both describe creation Christocentrically, oriented in its design and goal toward the Incarnate Word. Both understand humans as radically responsible for the non-human world. These similarities point to a more foundational congruence in their Trinitarian theologies. Rahner and Bonaventure connect the Father’s personal character as fontal source of Son and Spirit to God’s unoriginated and free relation to creation. If the Word expresses the Father fully, creation expresses God in a real but incomplete way. This grounds a series of analogous relationships between created spirit and matter, human freedom and nature, as well as grace and human nature. From this perspective, Rahner’s evolutionary Christology can be seen as ecologically significant, appreciatively critical of evolution, and ultimately rooted in the Trinity.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
4

Bracken, Joseph A. "The God of Evolution: A Trinitarian Theology. By Denis Edwards. New York: Paulist, 1999. vi + 144 pages. $14.95. - God after Darwin: A Theology of Evolution. By John F. Haught. Boulder, CO: Westview, 2000. xiii + 221 pages. $25.00." Horizons 27, nr 1 (2000): 196–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0360966900021009.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
5

Theron, J. "Trinitarian Anthropology". Verbum et Ecclesia 29, nr 1 (3.02.2008): 222–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ve.v29i1.14.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
This article looks at the problem of the so-called “point of contact” between God and mankind, or more particularly, the relation between trinity and anthropology. Does Christian anthropology develop from the doctrine on creation, the human nature of Christ or the work of the Holy Spirit? In opposition to the current trinitarian perspectives on humanity, which mainly focus on relational similitude, the theology of the Dutch theologian, Oepke Noordmans critically resists any attempt at finding analogies between the trinity and humanity. According to him, creation is judgment of God, which has critical implications for any independent anthropology: There is no perpetuation of the incarnation in our humanity, church or liturgy after the resurrection, and the re-creative work of the Spirit does not have a point of contact with any constitutive element in our humanity. The judgment of the cross reaches from creation across history to recreation.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
6

Rossi-Keen, Daniel E. "Jurgen Moltmann's doctrine of God: The trinity beyond metaphysics". Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 37, nr 3-4 (wrzesień 2008): 447–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000842980803700304.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
In this article I show how Moltmann's rejection of metaphysics (as a theological starting point) serves as an important controlling feature of his trinitarian doctrine of god. In so doing, I articulate several reasons that have motivated Moltmann's post-metaphysical methodological choices when formulating his trinitarian doctrine of god. After considering such reasons, I then address three distinctive elements of Moltmann's doctrine of god that emerge from his post-metaphysical trinitarian doctrine of god.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
7

Bracken, Joseph A. "Panentheism from a Trinitarian Perspective". Horizons 22, nr 1 (1995): 7–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0360966900028917.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
AbstractClassical models of the God–world relationship tend to emphasize the transcendence of God at the expense of God's immanence to the world of creation. Neo-classical or process-oriented models, on the other hand, tend to emphasize the immanence of God within the world process at the expense of the divine transcendence. Using the distinction originally made by Thomas Aquinas between person and nature within the Godhead, the author offers a modified process-oriented understanding of the God–world relationship in which the transcendence of the triune God to creation is assured but in which creatures derive their existence and activity from the divine nature or ground of being along with the divine persons. Ultimate Reality, therefore, is not God in a unipersonal sense, nor the three divine persons apart from creation, but a Cosmic Society of existents, both finite and infinite, who are sustained by one and the same underlying principle of existence and activity.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
8

Fubara-Manuel, Benebo Fubara. "In Communion with the Trinitarian God". Exchange 44, nr 3 (11.09.2015): 284–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1572543x-12341369.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
This paper is a Reformed reflection on The Church: Towards a Common Vision (ctcv). It seeks to explore an aspect of the rich contribution of ctcv to the understanding of the depth of the unity that the church has received from the Trinitarian God as a gift, and to which it has been called to witness, namely, the communion that exists between God and creation. It shall argue that, whereas ctcv has worked upon several years of ecumenical labour, and whereas it is a most invaluable work in ecumenical understanding of church unity, it fails to develop a robust theology of creation and, as such, fails to do justice to the richness of communion that the church and creation has with the Trinitarian God. This reflection shall be informed by some of the historic Reformed confessions, some modern Reformed confessions and the rich history of Reformed participation in ecumenical conversations.1
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
9

Pannenberg, Wolfhart. "Eternity, Time and the Trinitarian God". Dialog: A Journal of Theology 39, nr 1 (marzec 2000): 9–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0012-2033.00002.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
10

Rice, Scott P. "Timely, Transcendent, and Alive: Trinity in Jenson’s Understanding of the God–World Relation". Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology 28, nr 3 (1.07.2019): 253–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1063851219846700.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
Robert W. Jenson conceives of the God-world relation through a temporally inclusive idea of God that many critics find objectionable. Central to Jenson’s proposal is that God precedes the history that God lives with others by means of God’s own future. Does this make sense? In this essay I argue that it does, and that Jenson’s account needs to be demystified. The key to this, particularly, demonstrating the coherence of the God-time relation in view of the divine futurity, lies in the understanding of Jenson’s trinitarian theology. I will show that Jenson’s temporal idea of God, with a focus on his doctrine of the Spirit, is consonant with the trinitarian relations and should not be identified with the poles of created time in an overtly literal way. I also draw on Jenson’s trinitarian logic of divine unity to illustrate the reality of God in the process of time in his doctrine of creation.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
Więcej źródeł

Rozprawy doktorskie na temat "Trinitarian God of evolution"

1

Robinson, Andrew John. "A semiotic model of Trinity : God, evolution and the philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce". Thesis, University of Exeter, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.273016.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
2

Foord, Peter Michael, i res cand@acu edu au. "Theology Engaging Evolutionary Theory: Fresh insights into the nature of God". Australian Catholic University. School of Theology, 2004. http://dlibrary.acu.edu.au/digitaltheses/public/adt-acuvp45.29082005.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
This thesis explores the work of three theologians, Arthur Peacocke, John Haught and Denis Edwards, each of whom has made a significant contribution to the dialogue between contemporary evolutionary biology and the Christian understanding of God. The thesis explores and analyses how evolutionary theory throws light on key theological themes such as the nature of God's providence, especially in relation to pain, suffering and evil, and the meaning of Jesus Christ. The thesis involves a critical reading of the selected theologians' works, with their respective emphases on classical, process and kenotic types of theological thinking, and also draws on resources from the classical theological tradition, primarily St. Thomas Aquinas. The study gives a positive assessment of the contributions of the three chosen authors. It highlights the critical importance that theological methodology plays in formulating insights into the relationship of God to evolutionary processes. Peacocke emphasises the use of critical realism as the most credible methodology for theology, consistent with its use by science. Haught agrees with this approach stressing, however, that the data of theology is not the same as that for science. Consequently, he argues that theology ought to constitute the deepest layer of explanation for understanding reality and for understanding God as the ultimate explanation for evolution. Edwards argues that we must find a way of talking about God that is consonant with the reality of the world but that this God always remains ultimately Mystery. Peacocke, Haught and Edwards explore the usefulness of kenotic theology for explaining how belief in an omnipotent and supremely loving God can be reconciled with the existence of pain, suffering and evil in the creation. Although a kenotic approach can account for the scientific evidence of a “self-creative” and emergent cosmos along with the presence of suffering and evil, a more comprehensive theological viewpoint must include an understanding of how God is active in creation, sustaining it in existence and drawing it towards its divinely ordained end. Haught's argument for the presence of genuine contingency in the cosmos as evidence of God's on-going creativity is critically examined. Genuinely new possibilities, in evolutionary terms, new species, cannot be explained by material causation alone. In his “metaphysics of the future”, Haught argues that, despite the enormity of pain and suffering evidenced in evolution, God continues to lovingly draw the creation towards a hopeful and promised future in God. This thesis appreciates the value of Edwards’ trinitarian “God of evolution” for it combines a more classical theological approach with evolutionary theory. For Edwards, biological evolution is seen as a process within an ontologically relational creation that reflects the divine relations of the Trinity. The creation of being-in-relation flows out of, and reflects, the divine trinitarian relations of mutual love. Edwards’ insights into the nature of original sin and grace within an evolutionary context are also positively assessed. Both Peacocke and Edwards propose a Wisdom Christology as the most fruitful link between the biblical Sophia tradition and a creation theology, holding together insights on the divine Being, Wisdom and the Christ-event itself. Aspects of process and kenotic theologies can be usefully combined with Aquinas' expansive notion of God as ultimate Being. Through this synthesis, the drama of evolution is more intimately related with the ultimate reality, the Mystery of God. Throughout this thesis, gender-neutral language has been maintained except in some quotations of St. Thomas Aquinas.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
3

com, haybel@bigpond, i Haydn D. Nelson. "The providence of God : a trinitarian perspective". Murdoch University, 2005. http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20051129.162926.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
The primary focus of this dissertation is the doctrine of the Providence of God and it is approached from a distinctive perspective – that of the doctrine of the Trinity.Its fundamental thesis is that the adoption of a trinitarian perspective on Providence provides us with a conceptual paradigm in which varying theological emphases, which often divide understandings of Providence, are best understood in a form of paradoxical tension or creative balance with each being correctly understood only in the context that the other provides. To demonstrate this, it addresses four issues of Providence that have on occasion divided understandings of Providence in the past and which have become significant issues of contention in the contemporary debate on Providence occasioned by a proposal known as Open Theism. These issues concern the nature of divine transcendence, sovereignty, immutability and impassibility and how each should be understood in the context of divine Providence. Through a detailed examination of three recent trinitarian theologies, which have emanated from the three main communities of the Christian church, it argues that a trinitarian perspective is able to provide significant illumination and explication of these identified issues of Providence and of the tensions that are often intrinsic to this doctrine. In relation to these identified issues of Providence, it affirms tensional truths in our understanding of the issues of Providence and an articulation that necessarily incorporates a binary form of language – that is, utilising language of both-and rather than either-or. In other words, it posits that divine transcendence ought to be held in paradoxical tension with divine immanence; divine sovereignty ought to be held in paradoxical tension with human responsibility; and divine immutability and impassibility ought not to be understood as immobility or impassivity but as affirming the paradoxical tension of active constancy. The articulation of these tensional truths is followed and completed by an examination of how they might be applied pastorally in the specific area of prayer and its relationship to Providence. Consequently, this dissertation not only constructively impacts our understanding of divine Providence but also significantly advances the contemporary debate on Providence concerning Open Theism.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
4

Nelson, Haydn D. "The providence of God: a trinitarian perspective". Nelson, Haydn D. (2005) The providence of God: a trinitarian perspective. PhD thesis, Murdoch University, 2005. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/224/.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
The primary focus of this dissertation is the doctrine of the Providence of God and it is approached from a distinctive perspective - that of the doctrine of the Trinity. Its fundamental thesis is that the adoption of a trinitarian perspective on Providence provides us with a conceptual paradigm in which varying theological emphases, which often divide understandings of Providence, are best understood in a form of paradoxical tension or creative balance with each being correctly understood only in the context that the other provides. To demonstrate this, it addresses four issues of Providence that have on occasion divided understandings of Providence in the past and which have become significant issues of contention in the contemporary debate on Providence occasioned by a proposal known as Open Theism. These issues concern the nature of divine transcendence, sovereignty, immutability and impassibility and how each should be understood in the context of divine Providence. Through a detailed examination of three recent trinitarian theologies, which have emanated from the three main communities of the Christian church, it argues that a trinitarian perspective is able to provide significant illumination and explication of these identified issues of Providence and of the tensions that are often intrinsic to this doctrine. In relation to these identified issues of Providence, it affirms tensional truths in our understanding of the issues of Providence and an articulation that necessarily incorporates a binary form of language - that is, utilising language of both-and rather than either-or. In other words, it posits that divine transcendence ought to be held in paradoxical tension with divine immanence; divine sovereignty ought to be held in paradoxical tension with human responsibility; and divine immutability and impassibility ought not to be understood as immobility or impassivity but as affirming the paradoxical tension of active constancy. The articulation of these tensional truths is followed and completed by an examination of how they might be applied pastorally in the specific area of prayer and its relationship to Providence. Consequently, this dissertation not only constructively impacts our understanding of divine Providence but also significantly advances the contemporary debate on Providence concerning Open Theism.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
5

Nelson, Haydn Desmond. "The providence of God : a trinitarian perspective /". Access via Murdoch University Digital Theses, 2005. http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20051129.162926.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
6

Mortensen, Hallur. "The baptismal episode as trinitarian narrative : proto-trinitarian structures in Mark's conception of God". Thesis, Durham University, 2018. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12543/.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
This thesis examines the concept of 'God' in Mark's Gospel, with particular emphasis on the baptismal scene of 1:9-11. The introduction outlines the previous research on the subject. Despite recent contributions, the nature of the relation between God, Jesus, and the Spirit is still understudied. Chapter 1 discusses the preliminary question of the extent and function of Mark's prologue and Mark's use of the Old Testament. Chapter 2 argues that the beginning and end of the prologue (1:2-3 and 1:14-15) concerning the coming of the Lord, the good news, and the coming of God's kingdom, must be related with each other and establish the context for interpreting the baptismal narrative. This chapter also examines Jewish monotheism and argues that God is known in his actions and relations. Chapter 3 argues that the torn heaven at the baptism alludes to the plea for God to tear open the heavens in Isaiah 63:19. This is linked with the tearing of the temple veil in 15:38. Chapter 4 examines allusions of the divine voice to Psalm 2 and Isaiah 42, and especially its function in revealing the identity of Jesus. The chapter also argues for the narrative unveiling of Jesus as the Son of God, and thus also of God as the Father of Jesus. Chapter 5 argues that the Spirit's descent is an anointing of Jesus and has a critical function in the coming of the kingdom and the defeat of Satan. The identity of the Spirit is examined and found to be divine yet distinct within God. The final chapter proposes that Mark has a proto- and narrative trinitarian conception of God and that later trinitarian doctrine is a response to pressure exerted by texts such as this one. The appendix further examines the open heaven motif in depth.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
7

Eugenio, Dick. "Communion with God : the Trinitarian soteriology of Thomas F. Torrance". Thesis, University of Manchester, 2011. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/communion-with-god-the-trinitarian-soteriology-of-thomas-f-torrance(a25c75a0-d19c-4adf-bd59-60f93fa3ddf1).html.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
This thesis presents Thomas F. Torrance's Trinitarian soteriology, and as such seeks to combine the two most common but often separately treated doctrines in his theological cogitation: Trinity and soteriology. It argues that in a circular manner, Torrance's Trinitarian theology is explicitly soteriological and his soteriology is explicitly Trinitarian. This is because he (1) follows Barth's proposal that God's Being is inseparable from his Act, and vice versa, and (2) consistently employs his comprehensive theological rule that the Trinity is 'the ground and grammar of theology.' As such, this thesis also argues that not only is Torrance's soteriology Trinitarian, but that his soteriology could only be presented, understood and appreciated as Trinitarian. Non-trinitarian or implicitly Trinitarian readings of his soteriology cannot but fail to do justice to Torrance's theological consistency and genius. Furthermore, this thesis argues that Torrance's Trinitarian soteriology is consistent with his scientific and evangelical theology. On the one hand, Torrance's soteriological formulation follows scientific principles because he understands both the arche and telos of human salvation in strict accordance with the Being, Persons and Work of the Triune God. This is referred in the thesis as Torrance's kataphysic soteriology. On the other hand, Torrance's soteriological formulation follows an evangelical procedure grounded in the evangelical content of revelation. Because the content of God's Self-revelation is the Triune God reconciling the world to himself, Torrance understands that the Three Persons are actively involved in the salvific economy in strict accordance with their hypostases as Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The evangelical procedure and sketch that Torrance employs is derived from 2 Corinthians 13:14, 'the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit.' For Torrance, the ultimate telos of human salvation is participation in the very Life and Love of the Triune God. This may be referred to as humanity's perichoretic participation in the Communion of Love that God is. Humanity's sharing in the Triune Communion, however, is a mediated participation, encapsulated in the Athanasian aphorism 'from the Father through the Son in the Spirit and in the Spirit through the Son to the Father.' All three Persons of the Triune God fulfil distinct salvific agencies in accordance to their hypostases, but their distinct agencies have a united source and goal: the mediation of reconciliation with the Triune God. It is also argued that our participation in the Triune Communion is a human participation, or that we relate with the Triune God as humanized humans rather than as metamorphosized divine beings.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
8

Fakkema, Douglas Edward. "Who speaks for God? exploring a Trinitarian response to Reformed ecclesiology /". Online full text .pdf document, available to Fuller patrons only, 2001. http://www.tren.com.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
9

Stearns, Michelle L. "Unity, God and music : Arnold Schoenberg's philosophy of compositional unity in trinitarian perspective". Thesis, St Andrews, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/405.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
10

Hay, Andrew R. "God's shining forth : a trinitarian theology of divine light". Thesis, University of St Andrews, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/6560.

Pełny tekst źródła
Streszczenie:
This thesis seeks an orderly set of theological reflections on the declaration that “God is light” (1 Jn. 1:5). Such talk of divine light, this study argues, must begin with the doctrine of God, namely, with God's light in se and his “shining forth” ad extra towards creatures in the darkness of sin and death. This work therefore follows a precise pathway in expounding this theme. Chapter 1 offers a brief survey of the historical and scriptural uses of the concept of light in order to fix its linguistic and conceptual boundaries. Chapter 2 seeks to reflect upon God's light as the light of his own radiant triune identity, as well as offering a preliminary examination of God's economic, covenantal shining forth to creatures. Chapter 3 gives a much more detailed rehearsal of this act of shining forth by an account of God's light as manifest in the economy of his works with which he lovingly elects, reconciles, and illuminates creatures. Chapter 4 proposes that with the treatment of God's shining forth there belongs a treatment of the light of the church called out of darkness, gathered into the “marvelous light” of God, and set to proclaiming the “excellencies” of God. Chapter 5 concludes this study by examining what bearing the reality of God's shining forth as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit might have on the work and call of theology as an activity of the 'illumined mind'.
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
Więcej źródeł

Książki na temat "Trinitarian God of evolution"

1

Cocksworth, Christopher J. Holy, holy, holy: Worshiping the Trinitarian God. London: Darton, Longman + Todd, 1997.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
2

Trinitarian theology and power relations: God embodied. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
3

God of our soil: Towards subaltern trinitarian theology. Delhi: Published by Indian Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge for Vidyajyoti Educational Welfare Society, 2010.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
4

The gifting God: A Trinitarian ethics of excess. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
5

J, Berry R., red. God and evolution. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1988.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
6

The God of hope: The trinitarian vision of Jürgen Moltmann. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1991.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
7

History and the triune God: Contributions to Trinitarian theology. New York: Crossroad, 1992.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
8

The God of the gospel: Robert Jenson's Trinitarian theology. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2013.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
9

The God who relates: An African-American Trinitarian theology. Lowell, Mass: Samizdat Press, 1997.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
10

Moltmann, Ju rgen. History and the triune God: Contributions to Trinitarian theology. [London]: SCM Pr., 1991.

Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
Więcej źródeł

Części książek na temat "Trinitarian God of evolution"

1

Bryan, William Jennings. "God and Evolution". W Creation-Evolution Debates, 1–8. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780367814366-1.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
2

Zimmerman, Michael. "Evolution v. Creation". W Whose God Rules?, 159–69. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137002242_10.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
3

Haught, John F. "A God for Evolution". W God After Darwin, 81–104. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429037207-6.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
4

Haught, John F. "Religion, Evolution, and Information". W God After Darwin, 57–80. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429037207-5.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
5

Haught, John F. "Religion, Ethics, and Evolution". W God After Darwin, 121–44. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429037207-8.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
6

Clark, Kelly James. "The Evolution of God?" W Religion and the Sciences of Origins, 115–36. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137414816_8.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
7

Haught, John F. "Cosmic Evolution and Divine Action". W God After Darwin, 165–84. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429037207-10.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
8

Haught, John F. "Evolution, Tragedy, and Cosmic Purpose". W God After Darwin, 105–20. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429037207-7.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
9

Franke, William. "The Self-Reflexive Trinitarian Structure of God and Creation". W Dante’s Paradiso and the Theological Origins of Modern Thought, 35–41. New York, NY: Routledge, 2021. | Series: Routledge interdisciplinary perspectives on literature: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003152156-6.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
10

Haught, John F. "Evolution, Ecology, and the Promise of Nature". W God After Darwin, 145–64. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429037207-9.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.

Streszczenia konferencji na temat "Trinitarian God of evolution"

1

Anquetil, Nicolas, Anne Etien, Gaelle Andreo i Stephane Ducasse. "Decomposing God Classes at Siemens". W 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsme.2019.00027.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
2

DENIZ, Osman Murat. "When Naturalism and Creationism Clash: Can a Person Believe in Both God and Evolution?" W The 2nd Virtual International Conference on the Dialogue between Science and Theology. EDIS - Publishing Institution of the University of Zilina, Slovak Republic, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.18638/dialogo.2015.2.1.18.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
3

Olbrich, Steffen M., Daniela S. Cruzes i Dag I. K. Sjoberg. "Are all code smells harmful? A study of God Classes and Brain Classes in the evolution of three open source systems". W 2010 IEEE 26th International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsm.2010.5609564.

Pełny tekst źródła
Style APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO itp.
Możesz być także zainteresowany rozszerzonymi bibliografiami na temat „Trinitarian God of evolution” dla poszczególnych typów źródeł:
Artykuły w czasopismach Rozprawy doktorskie Książki
Oferujemy zniżki na wszystkie plany premium dla autorów, których prace zostały uwzględnione w tematycznych zestawieniach literatury. Skontaktuj się z nami, aby uzyskać unikalny kod promocyjny!

Do bibliografii