Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Suspension des poursuites individuelles”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Spis treści
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Suspension des poursuites individuelles”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Suspension des poursuites individuelles"
Gabe, Jonathan. "La controverse sur l’Halcion en Grande-Bretagne : une étude sociologique". Dossier : Médicaments psychotropes : aspects psychosociaux 22, nr 1 (12.06.2008): 301–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/502108ar.
Pełny tekst źródłaBaldy, Anne, i René Baldy. "Le redoublement de la classe de seconde : résultats globaux et stratégies individuelles". L’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle 17, nr 4 (1988): 343–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/binop.1988.1679.
Pełny tekst źródłaDeloche, Regis, i Bertrand Chopard. "Entreprises en difficulte et reglement amiable: Faut-il supprimer la possibilite de suspension provisoire des poursuites?" Revue économique 55, nr 3 (maj 2004): 489. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3503378.
Pełny tekst źródłaGuihal, Dominique. "Poursuites du chef d'exploitation d'une installation classée sans autorisation. Contestation devant le juge administratif par le prévenu de l'arrêté préfectoral fixant un délai de régularisation. Suspension du procès pénal (non). Cass. crim., 14 novembre 2000, Claude Herrmann. Avec commentaire". Revue Juridique de l'Environnement 26, nr 2 (2001): 237–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rjenv.2001.3906.
Pełny tekst źródłaZinty, Stéphane. "Sort de la clause résolutoire du bail commercial en cas de procédure collective du preneur". Bacage, nr 01 (5.12.2023). http://dx.doi.org/10.35562/bacage.158.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Suspension des poursuites individuelles"
Ligan, Mahoutin. "La déclaration de créances et le nouveau droit des entreprises en difficulté : Approche comparative Droit français/Droit OHADA". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020TOUL0136.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe declaration of claim is a compulsory procedure reserved for all creditors of a debtor who is the subject of collective proceedings. It has a mainly financial purpose and its objective is to ascertain the debtor's liabilities, and therefore to measure his indebtedness on the day of the opening judgment. This is justified by the fact that the new law on companies in difficulty, unlike the old bankruptcy, introduces a submission to the rigorous rules of collective discipline for all the creditors of the failing company. It goes without saying that the declaration of claims is of considerable benefit to the debtor in that it allows the court to assess (after the verification and admission of claims) the possible solutions for rescuing the failing company through the weight of its liabilities. Similarly, it makes it possible to maintain a certain equality between the company's creditors, who will ensure that their rights are recognised in order to safeguard their chance of participating in the collective procedure of their debtor. Its legal basis is specified by Articles L. 622-24 et seq. of the French Commercial Code and 78 et seq. of the Uniform Act Organising Collective Proceedings (AUPC).Thus, from the publication of the opening judgment, all creditors whose claims arose prior to the opening judgment and subsequent creditors excluded from the preferential treatment of Article L. 662-17 of the French Commercial Code, with the exception of employees, shall send a declaration of their claims to the judicial representative within two (2) months. Where the creditor has been relieved of foreclosure in accordance with Article L. 622-26 of the French Commercial Code, the time limits only run from the notification of this decision; they are then reduced by half. The time limit for filing a claim runs from the notification of this warning. Traditionally, a claim declaration was treated as a legal claim. Thus, until the Ordinance of 12 March 2014, a special written mandate was required for the validity of a declaration made by a person other than the debtor. Similarly, the agent then had to be able to provide proof of the mandate received until the day the judge ruled. In the new law on companies in difficulty, the declaration of claim is perceived as a simple conservatory act, insofar as it is, in certain respects, more akin to a formal notice or an administrative formality. We owe this reconsideration of the nature of the declaration of claim to the French order of 12 March 2014.This is to be welcomed insofar as this development contributes to improving the preservation of creditors' rights. Despite the close relationship between French and OHADA legislation, it must be noted that the OHADA legislator has not taken advantage of its recent reform of 10 September 2015 to simplify the procedure for declaring claims as was done in 2014 in France. While such a failure can be justified by the youth of the legislation in force in the OHADA zone, it is appropriate for the OHADA legislator to consider a change in this area. In our opinion, this could encourage the debtor to provide the bodies of the procedure with a complete list of his creditors and thus enable the latter to benefit from the same chances of being paid
Koto-Tcheka, Alexandra Betty. "Le règlement préventif dans l'espace OHADA". Thesis, Montpellier 1, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012MON10051/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaFor 13 years, the OHADA legal framework has taken advantage of a "Acte Uniforme" ruling their common procedures. The latter sets up and determines the legal system of a new cammon procedure called the Preventive Rule. It aims at avoiding the suspension of payments. In addition, it allows the discharge thanks to a preventive composition. The new common system is inspired by the french law of the 23rd of september 1967 on the suspension of legal proceedings that some African countries had copied and put in their legislations,without changing anything. And it is also inspired by the French law of the 1st of march 1984 on the amical settlement. However, the preventive rule, althougt beneficial,has not resolved the enterprises issues, hence the necessity to analyse its unfoldind and its outcome. At the end, the conditions to open and to use the new procedure have to lie down to farmers, craftsmen, professionnal persons and to those of the informal sectors in order to allow them to also take advantage of it
Allafi, Mousa. "La cour pénale internationale et le conseil de sécurité : justice versus maintien de l'ordre". Thesis, Tours, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013TOUR1002/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe international criminal Court system (ICC) whose mission is to ensure international justice, is based on a close relationship with the security Council. So it is proper to wonder about the Council’s role in the functioning of international criminal justice. Such a questionning is fundamental, for the intervention of a political body into the functioning of a judicial body calls into question the missions of both institutions. The Council’s interference in the activity of the ICC, based on its mission of maintaining international peace, is actually carried out on behalf of an international order intended by the Council itself. This role affects the functioning, the independence and even the impartiality of the ICC. The powers the Rome Statute gives to the Council allow it to refer to the ICC, to impose for the States to cooperate with the Court, to suspend its activity or also to qualify an act as a crime of aggression. However the relations between the Council and the ICC should not be subordinated, but maintained in mutual respect. Thus there is a real concern regarding the observance of the Rome Statute by the Council. The study highlights the conflict between justice and politics and reveals the current issues in terms of international criminal justice
Ashnan, Almoktar. "Le principe de complémentarité entre la cour pénale internationale et la juridiction pénale nationale". Thesis, Tours, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015TOUR1004/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe purpose of this research is to analyse the principle of complementarity, to show the specific character of the notion and to study its implementation in the light of the practice of the International criminal court (ICC) in order to highlight the political and legal obstacles. In accordance with Article 1, the Court is complementary to national criminal jurisdictions for crime of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crime of aggression. Under this principle, national jurisdictions have priority over ICC but the Court’s jurisdiction takes over when a State lacks the technical or legal means, which are necessary to try and punish the perpetrators of such crimes, or if a rigged trial took place. Therefore, complementarity aims to bring an end to impunity for those responsible for the most serious crimes of international concern. The Rome Statute, namely with the provisions of Article 17, indicates how to implement complementarity according to the criteria for admissibility which are inability, unwillingness and seriousness. Articles 18 and 19, for their part, provide the mechanism of preliminary ruling regarding admissibility and challenge. Furthermore, the role of the Security Council regarding complementarity is also considered as essential to understand the effectiveness and the legal impact of this Court. Powers which are conferred under the Rome Statute and chapter VII of the United Nations Charter allow the Security Council to refer a situation to the ICC, to suspend an ICC investigation, to require States to cooperate with the ICC, or to qualify a crime as aggression, and this despite the fact that the independence of the investigation and of the trial is the backbone of criminal justice ensuring it is efficient