Rozprawy doktorskie na temat „Semantic paradoxes”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Sprawdź 24 najlepszych rozpraw doktorskich naukowych na temat „Semantic paradoxes”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Przeglądaj rozprawy doktorskie z różnych dziedzin i twórz odpowiednie bibliografie.
Rossi, Lorenzo. "Truth, paradoxes, and partiality : a study on semantic theories of naïve truth". Thesis, University of Oxford, 2015. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:026f12c0-8a1a-4094-8ee9-3b7405021870.
Pełny tekst źródłaEldridge-Smith, Peter, i peter eldridge-smith@anu edu au. "The Liar Paradox and its Relatives". The Australian National University. Faculty of Arts, 2008. http://thesis.anu.edu.au./public/adt-ANU20081016.173200.
Pełny tekst źródłaBurgis, Benjamin. "Truth is a One-Player Game: A Defense of Monaletheism and Classical Logic". Scholarly Repository, 2011. http://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/oa_dissertations/677.
Pełny tekst źródłaDalglish, Steven Jack William. "Accepting Defeat: A Solution to Semantic Paradox with Defeasible Principles for Truth". The Ohio State University, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1597757494987204.
Pełny tekst źródłaEklund, Matti 1974. "Paradoxes and the foundations of semantics and metaphysics". Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8798.
Pełny tekst źródłaIncludes bibliographical references (p. 175-180).
Numerous philosophical problems, otherwise quite different in character, are of the following form. Certain claims which seem not only obviously true, but even constitutive of the meanings of the expressions employed, can be shown to lead to absurdity when taken together (perhaps in conjunction with contingent facts about the world). All such problems can justly be called paradoxes. The paradoxes I examine are the liar paradox, the sorites paradox, and the personal identity paradox posed by the fission problem. I argue that, in all of the cases examined, the claims that jointly lead to absurdity really are constitutive of the meanings of the expressions employed, in the following ways. First, semantic competence with the expressions involves being disposed to accept these claims. Second, the claims are reference-determining, in that the semantic values of the expressions employed are constrained by the condition that these claims should come out true, or as nearly true as possible. If a claim or principle is constitutive of meaning in both of these ways, I call it meaning-constitutive. When the meaning-constitutive principles for some expressions of a language are inconsistent, I call the language inconsistent. This is a stipulative definition; but it accords well with what other theorists who have talked about languages being inconsistent, for example Alfred Tarski, have had in mind. In chapters one and two, I argue that our language is inconsistent. In chapter three, I relate my theses to Frank Jackson's and David Lewis's views on how reference is determined. Another problem posed by the liar paradox concerns important theses in the philosophy of language. The liar reasoning shows that under certain conditions, a natural language cannot contain a predicate satisfying the T-schema. But many theses in the philosophy of language presuppose that truth satisfies the T-schema. I resolve this conflict in a Tarskian way: by saying that truth then is expressed only in an essentially richer metalanguage. However, I argue that taking this route means having to embrace the existence of absolutely inexpressible properties - and even to embrace the conclusion that some properties of which we appear to have concepts are absolutely inexpressible. All this is dealt with in chapter four. In the fifth chapter I show that my arguments of the previous chapters have (dis)solved the liar paradox. And finally, in the sixth chapter, I discuss the philosophical significance of truth and logic, and argue that these questions are significant only if understood in a new way. In this last chapter I also discuss the implications of the liar paradox for metaphysics; more specifically, its implications for the issue of how metaphysical claims are justified.
by Matti Eklund.
Ph.D.
Machado, Julio Cesar. "O paradoxo a partir da teoria dos blocos semânticos : língua, dicionário e história". Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2015. https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/7810.
Pełny tekst źródłaApproved for entry into archive by Ronildo Prado (ronisp@ufscar.br) on 2016-10-11T19:31:38Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TeseJCM.pdf: 4590158 bytes, checksum: 2c97cc5bc376d0c6c91fa9230bea44a2 (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Ronildo Prado (ronisp@ufscar.br) on 2016-10-11T19:31:48Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TeseJCM.pdf: 4590158 bytes, checksum: 2c97cc5bc376d0c6c91fa9230bea44a2 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-11T19:45:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TeseJCM.pdf: 4590158 bytes, checksum: 2c97cc5bc376d0c6c91fa9230bea44a2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-03-20
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
In general, the idea of this work is to investigate the paradox, our object, by a linguistic and argumentative way, from the Theory of Semantic blocks (TBS). And specifically, for this, we adopted as main methods, two gestures: the relationship between linguistic elements as analysis condition, on the one hand, and the interdependence of its structure and significance, on the other hand, both in the non- use (language) and the use of language (enunciation). This second method of interdependence, when applied to our object, the paradox, becomes our first central hypothesis, the possibility of semantic paradox: the strange and difficult linguisticargumentative consideration of opposite significances, but in the interdependent state. And in this context we will also develop a second central hypothesis: the argumentative cube, while theoretical actualization of the argumentative square (the basic theoretical framework of our theory). Organizationally, the resourcefulness of this work will be carrying out in several specific strands, distributed throughout the chapters, namely: theory / paradox (divided into "Argumentation in the Language" / paradox, at first, and "Theory of Semantic Blocks "/ paradox, in a second stage); discours / paradox; dictionaries / paradox; "Historic Semantics of Enunciation" / paradox; relationship between languages / paradox and anteriority / paradox. In addition to these relational axes established to better observe our object, the paradox, and defend our hypothesis, the semantic paradox, we elected as central corpora, a group of dictionaries in which we can catch "which is said to be" a paradox and "as they say "a paradox to ponder" which means "a paradox. These dictionaries are divided into main corpus: Dictionnaire Historique de langue francaise, and and secondary corpora : Enciclopédia e Dicionário ilustrado, Kokugo Ziten e Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa, among others.
L'idée de ce travail est d'étudier le paradoxe d’une façon linguistique et argumentatif, à partir de la Théorie des Blocs Sémantiques (TBS). Et précisément pour cela, nous prenderons comme principales méthodologies deux gestes : la relation entre des éléments linguistiques comme condition d'analyse, et l'interdépendance entre la structure et sa significance, à partir tant par le champ du non-usage (langue), comme du champ d’usage de la langue (l'énonciation). Cette seconde méthode d'interdépendance, lorsqu'elle est appliquée à notre objet (le paradoxe) constitue mon premier hypothèse centrale : la possibilité du paradoxe sémantique : la considération linguistique-argumentative de signifiances opposées, mais dans un état d’interdépendance. Et dans ce contexte nous allons développer aussi une deuxième hipothèse centrale: le cube argumentatif, tandis que une atualization théorique du carré argumentatif (le construct théorique base dans notre théorie). Sur le plan organisationnel, l'ingéniosité de ce travail sera effectuer dans plusieurs axes spécifiques, répartis sur plusieurs chapitres: la théorie/paradoxe (premièrement «Argumentation dans la langue»/paradoxe, et deuxièmement «Théorie des blocs sémantiques»/paradoxe); discours/paradoxe; dictionnaires/paradoxe; «Sémantique Historiques de l'Énonciation» / paradoxe; relation entre des langues / paradoxe et antétriorité / paradoxe. En plus de ces axes relationnels mis en place pour mieux observer notre objet (le paradoxe) et de défendre mon hypothèse du paradoxe sémantique, je formerai un corpus à partir d’un groupe de dictionnaires dans lesquels appairassent « ce qui ce dit être » un paradoxe et « comment est-ce qu’» un paradoxe ce dit, afin de reflechir sur ce « que signifie un paradoxe ». Les dictionnaires sont divisés en corpus principal: Dictionnaire Historique de langue francaise, et corpora secondaire: Enciclopédia e Dicionário ilustrado, Kokugo Ziten e Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa, parmi d’autres.
De modo geral, a ideia deste trabalho é investigar o paradoxo, nosso objeto, de modo linguístico e argumentativo, a partir da Teoria dos Blocos Semânticos (TBS). E de modo específico, para isto, adotamos enquanto principais metodologias, dois gestos: a relação entre elementos linguísticos enquanto condição de análises, por um lado, e a interdependência entre a estrutura e suas significâncias, por outro lado, tanto no âmbito do não-uso (língua) quanto do uso da língua (enunciação). Este segundo método da interdependência, quando aplicado ao nosso objeto, o paradoxo, constitui a nossa primeira hipótese central, a possibilidade do paradoxo semântico: a estranha e difícil consideração linguístico-argumentativa de significâncias opostas, mas em estado de interdependência. E neste contexto desenvolveremos também uma segunda hipótese central: o cubo argumentativo, enquanto atualização teórica do quadrado argumentativo (o construto teórico basilar de nossa teoria). Organizacionalmente, a desenvoltura deste trabalho efetivar-se-á em vários eixos específicos, distribuídos ao longo dos capítulos, a saber: teoria/paradoxo (dividido em “Argumentação na Língua”/paradoxo, em um primeiro momento, e “Teoria dos Blocos Semânticos”/paradoxo, em um segundo momento); discurso/paradoxo; dicionários/paradoxo; “Semântica Histórica da Enunciação”/paradoxo; relação entre línguas/paradoxo e anterioridade/paradoxo. Além destes eixos relacionais estabelecidos para melhor observar nosso objeto, o paradoxo, e defender nossa hipótese, o paradoxo semântico, elegemos enquanto corpus central, um grupo de dicionários nos quais possamos flagrar “o que se diz ser” um paradoxo e “como se diz” um paradoxo, para ponderar “o que significa” um paradoxo. Estes dicionários estão divididos em corpus principal: Dictionnaire Historique de langue francaise, e corpus secundário: Enciclopédia e Dicionário ilustrado, Kokugo Ziten e Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa, dentre outros.
Bacon, Andrew Jonathan. "Indeterminacy : an investigation into the Soritical and semantical paradoxes". Thesis, University of Oxford, 2012. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:b4490a8c-0089-4c77-8d24-1ab1ca5baaf0.
Pełny tekst źródłaBette, Karl-Heinrich. "Körperspuren : zur Semantik und Paradoxie moderner Körperlichkeit /". Bielefeld : Transcript-Verl, 2005. http://www.gbv.de/dms/bs/toc/501094601.pdf.
Pełny tekst źródłaHassman, Benjamin John. "Semantic objects and paradox: a study of Yablo's omega-liar". Diss., University of Iowa, 2011. https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1228.
Pełny tekst źródłaWulf, Douglas J. "The imperfective paradox in the English progressive and other semantic course corrections /". Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/8368.
Pełny tekst źródłaLi, Dilin. "Can silence be a proper response to the liar paradox?" HKBU Institutional Repository, 2020. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_oa/877.
Pełny tekst źródłaSbardolini, Giorgio. "From Language to Thought: On the Logical Foundations of Semantic Theory". The Ohio State University, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu155307880402531.
Pełny tekst źródłaAgler, David Wells. "Vagueness and Its Boundaries: A Peircean Theory of Vagueness". Thesis, Connect to resource online, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1805/2101.
Pełny tekst źródłaTitle from screen (viewed on February 26, 2010). Department of Philosophy, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). Advisor(s): Cornelis de Waal, André De Tienne, Nathan R. Houser. Includes vitae. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 104-114).
Alvares, Cláudia Assad. "O discurso paradoxal de Vieira no \'Sermão pelo bom sucesso das Armas de Portugal contra as de Holanda\'". Universidade de São Paulo, 2007. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8142/tde-26022008-140441/.
Pełny tekst źródłaIn this thesis, among others, the concepts of \"universal auditorium\", from Perelman (2000); \"communication contract\", from Charaudeau (1992); the concepts of double bind and frames, proposed by Bateson (1972) are discussed, and room is opened for the main types of paradox. In this one, the theory of semantic traits and its combinatory, according to Langedoen (1971) is also presented and, finally, the sermon For the good success of Portugal\'s weapons against Holland\'s is analyzed. The work has as a scope to evidence that the religious speech from Father Antônio Vieira, at the sermon For the good success of Portugal\'s weapons against Holland\'s, is a paradoxal speech for it unbuilds itself. To reach such purpose, the arguments Vieira uses to address God are confronted, at the referred sermon, with the Holy Scriptures\' texts; the argumentativity of the nominal forms of the verbs is analyzed, with particular emphasis on the structure of the gerund, as an illocutionary act, starting from Sermon of the Sixtieth, and a kind of pragmatic paradox is created: the argumentative round.
Berthel, Jamie Scharton Maurice. "Everywhere empty paradox and difference in critical thinking and process rhetoric /". Normal, Ill. Illinois State University, 1995. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/ilstu/fullcit?p9604365.
Pełny tekst źródłaTitle from title page screen, viewed April 19, 2006. Dissertation Committee: Maurice Scharton (chair), Janice Neuleib, Ray Lewis White. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 169-172) and abstract. Also available in print.
Колесова, Д. С., Олена Анатоліївна Кириченко, Елена Анатольевна Кириченко i Olena Anatoliivna Kyrychenko. "Дискурс гумору та іронії в англійській мові". Thesis, Сумський державний університет, 2020. https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/77315.
Pełny tekst źródłaАктуальность данного исследования обусловлена тем, что юмор - неотъемлемая составляющая общения. Вместе с этим, межкультурные коммуникации характеризуются недоразумениями из-за разницы ментальных и лингвистических особенностей. Объектом исследования является национальный английский юмор. Предметом выступает его лингвокультурные характеристики. Цель исследования заключается в определении способов создания комического на основе особенностей английского языка. Юмор англичан характеризуется не только исключительно улыбками или ироничными замечаниями, которые трудно поддаются переводу.Причины непонимания английского юмора следующие: адресат не воспринимает ситуацию как такую, которая включает внутреннюю несоответствие, не осознает абсурдность или странность положения вещей; четко понимает внутреннее несоответствие ситуации, но считает, что юмор как мягкая форма критики к такой ситуации не относится, поскольку предметом осмеяния оказываются сверхценности данной культуры; для английского лингвокультуры это прежде всего индивидуальная независимость, антифатализм, высокий эмоциональный самоконтроль.
The relevance of this study is due to the fact that humor is an integral part of communication. At the same time, intercultural communications are characterized by misunderstandings due to differences of mental and linguistic features. The subject of the study is national English humor. The object is its linguistic and cultural characteristics. The purpose of the study is to identify ways to create comic based on the features of the English language.The humor of the British is not characterized only by smiles or ironic remarks that are difficult for translation. Reasons for misunderstanding of English humor are as follows : addressee does not perceive the situation as that including internal inconsistency, is not aware of the absurdity or strange state of affairs; clearly understands the internal mismatch in the situation, but believes that humor as a mild form of criticism of such a situation does not apply because the subjects of ridicule are overestimates of given culture; for English linguistics individual independence. anti-fatalism, high emotional self-control are above everything,
Kindermann, Dirk. "Perspective in context : relative truth, knowledge, and the first person". Thesis, University of St Andrews, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3164.
Pełny tekst źródłaEldridge-Smith, Peter. "The Liar Paradox and its Relatives". Phd thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/49284.
Pełny tekst źródłaMar, Gary. "Liars, truth-gaps, and truth a comparison of formal and philosophical solutions to the semantic paradoxes /". 1985. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/23959437.html.
Pełny tekst źródłaYoung, Ryan. "The Liar Paradox: A Consistent and Semantically Closed Solution". Phd thesis, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/8898.
Pełny tekst źródłaBronner, William Edward. "Insignificant differences : the paradox of the heap". Diss., 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1836.
Pełny tekst źródłaPhilosophy
M.A. (Philosophy)
Girard, Claire. "Logique du vague : survol des principales théories". Thèse, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/22171.
Pełny tekst źródłaPeterson, Clayton. "La logique déontique : une application de la logique à l'éthique et au discours juridique". Thèse, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/6915.
Pełny tekst źródłaIn this essay we aim to provide a critical analysis of the literature regarding deontic logic. First of all, we wish to give a historical account of deontic logic's evolution, which will be done mainly by chapter 2. This chapter concerns the paradoxes of deontic logic and gives an overview of the usual systems and their origin. Our second objective is to provide a synthesis of the literature regarding the formal analysis of the normative discourse. The chapters 3, 4 and 5 give an account of the three principal ways which deal with deontic operators, that is the monadic deontic logic, the dyadic deontic logic and the temporal deontic logic. Finally, we propose a critical analysis of that literature and we show that these systems do not represent adequately some of the normative discourse's fundamental characteristics. We will accomplish this by providing an analysis of the legal discourse and show that the concept of obligation has some properties and behaves in a way that cannot be represented by the actual systems.
Cet ouvrage a été rédigé en LaTeX, ce qui permet d'atteindre directement certaines sections, notes ou références bibliographiques par le biais des hyperliens.
Marx, Isabella Elizabeth. "Onomastiese studie van skoolname by Afrikaansmediumskole". Diss., 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/18138.
Pełny tekst źródłaIn hierdie verhandeling word skoolname as onderafdeling van die Onomastiek behandel. Die gee van skoolname is 'n amptelike aangeleentheid en daarom is die beleid onderliggend aan die handeling onder die loep geneem. Beleid bepaal die ortografiese aard van skoolname en die manifestasie daarvan is sosiolinguisties van belang. Skoolname, wat onder eiename ressorteer, is hoofsaaklik oor 'n semantiese en sosiolinguistiese boeg gegooi, daarom word terme soos verwysing, konvensie en agtergrondbeskrywing aan die hand van veral die teoriee van Devitt, Strawson en Kripke beskryf. Van Langendonck le veral klem op die pragmatiese aard van die eienaam en daarom vorm sy teorie, die hetekenisparadoks van die eienaam, 'n belangrike uitgangspunt by die konsepsuele en pragmatiese aard van skoolname. Die gee van name is In suiwer menslike handeling wat selde ooit ongemotiveer geskied. Die ontstaansmotiewe wat skoolnaamgewing ten grondslag le, word bespreek aan die hand van die verskillende kategoriee. Botsende sosiale faktore soos veral teweeggebring deur kulturele diversiteit beinvloed naamgewing en daarom verander name. Die faktore onderliggend aan naamsverandering word uitgelig en bespreek. Die moontlikheid om ten spyte van 'n multikulturele en multilinguistiese samelewing tog 'n nasionale identiteit te vertoon, word ten slotte ondersoek en bespreek.
In this dissertation, names of schools as a subdivision of Onomastics are dealt with. School names are researched mainly under the cloak of Semantics and Socio-linguistics. Therefore, terms like reference, convention and a backing of descriptions are referred to according to the theories of Devitt, Strawson and Kripke. Van Langendonck specifically emphasises the pragmatic nature of proper nouns in his theory the paradox of the meaning of proper nouns which is an important point of departure in the conceptual and pragmatic nature of the names of schools. The underlying motives in respect of school naming are categorized and discussed according to the motives of origin. Conflicting social factors play an important role in the naming of schools and therefore names also change. These changes are accentuated and discussed. The possibility for a country to reflect a national identity in spite of a multicultural and multilingual society, is explored and discussed.
Afrikaans & Theory of Literature
M.A. (Afrikaans)