Książki na temat „Road users- Highway”

County Road Safety Officers' Association., red. A highway code for young road users. [U.K.]: County Road Safety Officers' Association, 1989.

Ontario. Ministry of Transportation. Quality and Standards Division., red. Highway design systems: User's manual. [Downsview]: Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Quality & Standards Division, 1992.

Freight logistics: The road ahead as seen by the users of the highway system : hearing before the Subcommittee on Highways, Transit, and Pipelines of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, September 7, 2006. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2007.

National Cooperative Highway Research Program., red. Uses of recycled rubber tires in highways. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1994.

Bank, World, red. India financing highways. Washington: World Bank, 2004.

Jenkins, Brian Michael. POTENTIAL TERRIORIST USES OF HIGHWAY-BORNE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. San José, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute, 2010.

Geoff, Hodgson, red. Manual of contract documents for highway works: A user's guide and commentary. London: T. Telford, 1992.

United States. Federal Highway Administration., red. Read your road: Every highway user's guide to driving safely. [Washington, D.C.?: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1996.

Branch, Ontario Ministry of Transportation Research and Development. Cost-effectiveness of passing lanes: User's manual. Downsview, Ont: Research and Development Branch, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, 1991.

Ray, Barton, ADI Limited i Transportation Association of Canada, red. Highway user cost tables: A simplified method of estimating user cost savings for highway improvements. Ottawa, Ont: Transportation Association of Canada, 1993.

United States. Dept. of Transportation., red. 1997 federal highway cost allocation study. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Railroad Administration, 1997.

User and non-user benefit analysis for highways. Washington, D.C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2010.

Hough, Jill A. An assessment of regional road user needs in three rural states. [Fargo, N.D.]: Mountain-Plains Consortium, 2003.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials., red. User benefit analysis for highways manual. Washington, D.C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2003.

Washington (State). Planning, Research, and Public Transportation Division. i United States. Federal Highway Administration., red. Highway user taxes: A 50-state comparison 1985. Olympia, Wash: Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Planning, Research and Public Transportation Division, Economics Branch, 1986.

Washington (State). Planning, Research, and Public Transportation Division. i United States. Federal Highway Administration., red. Highway user taxes: A 50-state comparison 1984. [Olympia?]: Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Planning, Research and Public Transportation Division, Economics Branch, 1985.

Minnesota. Dept. of Transportation. i Cambridge Systematics, red. Final report: Highway cost allocation study. [Cambridge, Mass.]: Cambridge Systematics, 1990.

John, Williams. Survey of state and local highway taxes. [St. Paul]: Research Dept., Minnesota House of Representatives, 1990.

Inc, SYDEC, Urban Institute i Minnesota. Dept. of Transportation., red. Analysis of options for changes in various highway user tax rates in conjunction with Minnesota Highway Cost Allocation Study. [Reston, Va.]: SYDEC, 1990.

United States. Dept. of Transportation. University Research Program i Technology Sharing Program (U.S.), red. Decision tools for transportation infrastructure reinvestment: User guidelines for microcomputer Decision Support System (DSS). Washington, D.C: The Program, 1988.

United States. Federal Highway Administration i Government Finance Research Center, red. Transit and Highway Revenue and Improvement Forecasting Templates: THRIFT user's handbook. [Washington, D.C.?]: The Administration, 1987.

United States. Dept. of Transportation, red. 1997 federal highway cost allocation study: Summary report. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Railroad Administration, 1997.

United States. Dept. of Transportation., red. 1997 federal highway cost allocation study: Summary report. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Railroad Administration, 1997.

Ontario. Ministry of Transportation. Surveys & Design Office. A user's guide to the "Ontario provincial standards for roads and municipal services". Downsview, Ont: [Ontario Ministry of Transportation], 1992.

Office, General Accounting. Highway user fees: Updated data needed to determine whether all users pay their fair share : report to the Chairman, Committee on Public Works and Transportation, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1994.

Transportation Equity Act: A legacy for users : report (to accompany H.R. 3). [Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O., 2005.

Snell, Ronald. Weight-distance taxes and other highway user taxes: An introduction for legislators and legislative staff. Denver, Colo: Fiscal Affairs Program, National Conference of State Legislatures, 1989.

Aghazadeh, Fereydoun. Analysis of user waiting costs for construction projects on Louisiana's interstate highway system. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Transportation Research Center, 2003.

Helsel, Dennis R. Contributions of suspended sediment from highway construction and other land uses to the Olentangy River, Columbus, Ohio. Columbus, Ohio: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Geological Survey, 1985.

Office, General Accounting. Highway Trust Fund: Revenue sources, uses, and spending controls : fact sheet for the Honorable Jim Nussle, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1991.

Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users : conference report of the Committee of Conference on H.R. 3. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2005.

Congress, U. S. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users : conference report of the Committee of Conference on H.R. 3. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2005.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Transportation Equity Act: A legacy for users : report of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on H.R. 3550. [Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O., 2004.

Claudia, Bilotto, Chang Mark, United States. Federal Highway Administration, Booz Allen Hamilton, HNTB Corporation i Chang Mark (Transportation analyst), red. Policy Options Evaluation Tool for Managed Lanes (POET-ML) users guide and methodology description: Federal Highway Administration HOV lane performance. Washington D.C: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2008.

British Library. Science Reference and Information Service., red. Road charging in the 90s: An overview and guide to the literature. London: The British Library Science Reference and Inforamtion Service, 1994.

Financing investments in highways and mass transit: Hearing before the Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, hearing held in Washington, DC, March 17, 2009. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2010.

Whitty, James M. Oregon's mileage fee concept and road user fee pilot program: Report to the 73rd Oregon Legislative Assembly on proposed alternatives to the current system of taxing highway use through motor vehicle fuel taxes. Salem, OR: Oregon Dept. of Transportation, 2005.

Long-term financing options for the Highway Trust Fund including member proposals: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures of the Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, July 23, 2009. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2011.

Public-private partnerships: State and user perspectives : hearing before the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, May 24, 2007. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2007.

A highway code for young road users. [U.K.]: Department of Transport and LARSOA, 1996.

Committee on Transportation and (house), United States House of Representatives i United States United States Congress. Freight Logistics: The Road Ahead As Seen by the Users of the Highway System. Independently Published, 2019.

Lewis, David Levering. Road User and Mitigation Costs in Highway Pavement Projects (Synthesis of Highway Practice,). National Academy Press, 1999.

Tucker, Jonathan. The Silk Road: China and the Karakorum Highway. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780755652372.

User Benefit Analysis for Highways: August 2003. Not Avail, 2003.

1997 federal highway cost allocation study. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, 1997.

United States. Congress. Joint Committee on Taxation, red. Comparison of the tax provisions contained in H.R. 3550, the "Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users," as passed by the House of Representatives, and H.R. 3550, the "Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2004," as amended by the Senate. [Washington, D.C: Joint Committee on Taxation, 2004.