Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Renvoi préalable”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Renvoi préalable”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Renvoi préalable"
Vieilledent, Catherine. "Financements européens, conditionnalité et respect des valeurs". Futuribles N° 459, nr 2 (16.02.2024): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/futur.459.0079.
Pełny tekst źródłaBruneel, Emmanuelle. "Promouvoir « la parité » en entreprise : un enjeu de communication source de dépolitisation de l'égalité". Revue Communication & professionnalisation, nr 12 (6.05.2021): 9–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.14428/rcompro.vi12.53163.
Pełny tekst źródłaCornish, Francis. "Anaphoriques en première mention : « Épiphénomène », ou modèle pour le fonctionnement de l’anaphore ?" Journal of French Language Studies, 6.11.2023, 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0959269523000224.
Pełny tekst źródła"Centrale de Cattenom. Autorisation de rejets d'effluents. Enquête préalable à la D.U.P. prévoyant deux tranches de 900 MW. DAC autorisant sans nouvelle enquête deux tranches de 1 300 MW. Nécessité d'une nouvelle enquête. Illégalité du DAC. Opération complexe. Pollution transfrontière. Article 37 du traité Euratom. Consultation de la Commission. Nécessité de la consultation préalable à l'autorisation de rejets. Question préjudicielle. Renvoi à la C.J.C.E. Tribunal administratif Strasbourg, 11 juin 1987 (Formation pleinière), Land de Sarre et autres c/ Ministre de l'Industrie, des P. et T. et du Tourisme (Req. n° 86-831)". Revue Juridique de l'Environnement 12, nr 4 (1987): 491–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rjenv.1987.2272.
Pełny tekst źródłaDesveaux, Emmanuel. "Parenté". Anthropen, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.17184/eac.anthropen.102.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Renvoi préalable"
Casu, Gatien. "LE RENVOI PRÉALABLE. Essai sur l'unification préjudicielle de l'interprétation". Thesis, Lyon 3, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013LYO30078/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaDuring the last fifty years, the number of preliminary ruling mechanisms has multiplied. The movement first started with the preliminary ruling referral to the Court of Justice, which was soon followed by the preventive removal to the Court of Conflict. During the end of the eighties and in the early nineties, the movement reached confirmation through the creation of the possibility to ask its views to the State Council and to the Court of Cassation. It’s now getting faster and faster because of the recent creation of both the priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality, and the adoption, in front of the European Convention on Human Rights, of the protocol number fifteen, which introduces a system allowing the request for opinions in front of the eponymous Court. The research work invites to question about the causes of that singular devotion.The study proves that the use of the preliminary ruling procedure is nowadays endowed with a particular aim: that of ensuring the unification of the way legal texts are interpreted. Preliminary ruling mechanisms are the answer to a need, that of unifying the interpretation of the law, that need still remains unmet because of the decay of the hierarchical mechanisms which have been so far asked to manage it. As a matter of fact, both the acceleration of law time and the development of the supra-legality have collapsed these sediment mechanisms, which, just like Cassation, have to do with punishment.The same effect (the unification of the law), the same means (preliminary ruling technique), the same cause (the collapse of traditional mechanisms): there is no doubt about the link between all contemporary preliminary ruling mechanisms. They all reveal a new way of unifying interpretation which, like a tidal wave, becomes more and more powerful. It was becoming urgent to create a new legal tool which would be able to reveal this evolution, to create a new notion: pre-filing referrals. Pre-filing referrals is therefore said to be “any mechanism through which a supreme jurisdiction standardizes a text interpretation, after the referring of a law question which is raised in case of dispute”
Vachey, Julien. "L'urgence et le contrôle juridictionnel des atteintes législatives aux droits fondamentaux. : Etude de droit processuel public interne et européen". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021TOUL0146.
Pełny tekst źródłaCan urgency be reconciled with legislative review in the context of emergency appeals for the provisional protection of fundamental rights and in the context of pre filing referral mechanisms ?The study first focuses on the legislative review in emergency appeals for the provisional protection of fundamental rights. It then considers how is urgency considered in the referral review procedures carried out by ad quem judges. Despite initial reluctance, the function of summary proceedings judge is opening to the exercise of legislative review. Thus, there is a growing sensitivity of the referral review procedures to urgent situations of legislative violations of fundamental rights. Eventually, there is ground for arguing that the legislative review not only can be adapted to urgent situations we shall see how but also must be we shall see why
Buruianã, Monica-Elena. "L'application de la loi étrangère en droit international privé". Thesis, Bordeaux, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016BORD0067/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe national or the European private international law is taking into a particular accountthe foreign legal systems. The foreign law application is an expression of the attention given to the foreignlegal systems, but applying a law that belongs to a different legal system than the legal system of the forumcountry may provoke a defence reaction caused by the existing differences between the legal systemsinvolved. The foreign law application is therefore confronted to different obstacles that tend to ensure aprimary application of the lex fori. First, the techniques used by the legal system of the forum country toapply the foreign law are not entirely favourable to this kind of application, as evidenced by the recurrentintervention of the international public policy. Furthermore, there are elements that are exogenous to thelegal system of the forum country, such as different understandings of the same legal institution that canobstruct the foreign law application. There is thus a gap between the theory of the private internationalrules, which would appeal a frequent application of the foreign law, and the use that is made of them by theauthorities of the forum country, which often leads to the neutralization of the foreign law. This studydefends a better compliance to the theory of private international law, which would promote the applicationof the foreign law. In this perspective, the private international law of the European Union provides animportant source of « savoir-faire » as it promotes the application of a foreign law belonging to anotherMember States
Kardimis, Théofanis. "La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce)". Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3004.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe first party of the study is dedicated to the invocation of the right to a fair trial intra and extra muros and, on this basis, it focuses on the direct applicability of Article 6 and the subsidiarity of the Convention and of the European Court of Human Rights. Because of the fact that the right to a fair trial is a ‘‘judge-made law’’, the study also focuses on the invocability of the judgments of the European Court and more precisely on the direct invocability of the European Court’s judgment finding that there has been a violation of the Convention and on the request for an interpretation in accordance with the European Court’s decisions. The possibility of reviewing the criminal judgment made in violation of the Convention has generated a new right of access to the Court of cassation which particularly concerns the violations of the right to a fair trial and is probably the most important step for the respect of the right to a fair trial after enabling the right of individual petition. As for the weak conventional basis of the authority of res interpretata (“autorité de la chose interprétée”), this fact explains why an indirect dialogue between the ECHR and the Court of cassation is possible but doesn’t affect the applicant’s right to request an interpretation in accordance with the Court’s decisions and the duty of the Court of cassation to explain why it has decided to depart from the (non-binding) precedent.The second party of the study is bigger than the first one and is dedicated to the guarantees of the proper administration of justice (Article 6§1), the presumption of innocence (Article 6§2), the rights which find their conventional basis on the Article 6§1 but their logical explanation to the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence (Article 6§3). More precisely, the second party of the study is analyzing the right to an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, the right to a hearing within a reasonable time, the principle of equality of arms, the right to adversarial proceedings, the right of the defence to the last word, the right to a public hearing and a public pronouncement of the judgement, the judge’s duty to state the reasons for his decision, the presumption of innocence, in both its procedural and personal dimensions, the accused’s right to lie, his right to remain silent, his right against self-incrimination, his right to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation and the potential re-characterisation of the facts, his right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence, including in particular the access to the case-file and the free and confidential communication with his lawyer, his right to appear in person at the trial, his right to defend either in person or through legal assistance, his right to be represented by his counsel, his right to free legal aid if he hasn’t sufficient means to pay for legal assistance but the interests of justice so require, his right to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him and his right to the free assistance of an interpreter and to the translation of the key documents. The analysis is based on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and focuses on the position taken by the French and the Greek Court of Cassation (Areopagus) on each one of the above mentioned rights
Streszczenia konferencji na temat "Renvoi préalable"
Felix-Fromentin, Clotilde. "Autour du pyjama de Le Corbusier Le vêtement comme modèle de pensée fondateur". W LC2015 - Le Corbusier, 50 years later. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/lc2015.2015.845.
Pełny tekst źródła