Artykuły w czasopismach na temat „Publication”
Kliknij ten link, aby zobaczyć inne rodzaje publikacji na ten temat: Publication.
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Sprawdź 50 najlepszych artykułów w czasopismach naukowych na temat „Publication”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Przeglądaj artykuły w czasopismach z różnych dziedzin i twórz odpowiednie bibliografie.
1
Rohilla, Kusum K., Pratima Gupta, C. Vasantha Kalyani, Sharal Fernandes, Seshadri Reddy Varikasuvu i Saurabh Varshney. "Ethics in Publication". Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice 4, nr 3 (2023): 118–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jssrp.jssrp_19_23.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Abstract Academic research requires careful planning of study, execution, collection of data, data analysis, and publications. Although by following all steps and then receiving publication are always wonderful, the main aim of this research paper was to know about publication’s ethics. Researcher did extensive review of literature on searching of search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase using various search studies from December 2022 to January 2023. Review of literature identified that before beginning of any study, the Clinical Trial Registry of India approval, Institutional Ethics Committee approval, and informed consent from study participants are always required. Research fraud such as data fabrication or data falsification should be taken care while doing any research. Before publication, always verify plagiarism and give researcher’s credit according to their contributions. Simultaneous submission of the same manuscript in various journals at a time must be avoided. Most of journals are following the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors recommendations and that is must requirement for considering authorship for any paper. Conflicts of interest must be declared in each research paper. You can use the checklist for publication’s ethics as a guide; if the score is ≥7, the publication is violating publication’s ethics. Authors or researchers should be clear, must know publication behavior, do honest research, and pursue publication ethics.
2
Gorbunov-Posadov, Mikhail. "Alive Publication". Publications 11, nr 2 (7.04.2023): 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications11020024.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
An alive publication is a new genre for presenting the results of scientific research, where the scientific work is published online, and then is constantly being developed and improved by its author. Serious errors and typos are no longer fatal, nor do they haunt the author for the rest of his or her life. The reader of an alive publication knows that the author is constantly monitoring changes occurring in this branch of science. Alive publication faces the inertia of scientific publishing traditions and, in particular, traditional bibliometrics. Unfortunately, at present, the author who supports an alive publication is dramatically losing out on many generally accepted bibliometric indicators. The alive publication encourages the development of the bibliography apparatus. Each bibliographic reference will soon have to contain on-the-fly attributes such as attendance, number of external links, date of the last revision, etc. In the opinion of the writer of these lines, as the alive publication spreads over to the scientific world, the author’s concern for the publication’s evolution will become like a parent’s care for the development of a child. The Internet will be filled with scientific publications that do not lose their relevance with time.
3
BRITTON, J., i A. J. KNOX. "Duplicate publication, redundant publication, and disclosure of closely related publications". Thorax 54, nr 5 (1.05.1999): 378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.5.378.
Pełny tekst źródła
4
Ainsworth, GC, i Grace M. Waterhouse. "Miscellaneous publications: New publication 1989". Mycologist 3, nr 2 (kwiecień 1989): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0269-915x(89)80091-6.
Pełny tekst źródła
5
Slavin, Konstantin V. "Publication world and world publications". Surgical Neurology 44, nr 1 (lipiec 1995): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(95)00178-6.
Pełny tekst źródła
6
Johnson, Colin. "Publication, publication, publication…". Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 96, nr 1 (styczeń 2014): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588414x13814021676918.
Pełny tekst źródła
7
Woolley, Karen L. "Coincidence? Publications Expertise Boosts Publication Output". Journal of Surgical Education 71, nr 1 (styczeń 2014): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.007.
Pełny tekst źródła
8
Carey, Luke C., Serina Stretton, Charlotte A. Kenreigh, Linda T. Wagner i Karen L. Woolley. "High nonpublication rate from publication professionals hinders evidence-based publication practices". PeerJ 4 (10.05.2016): e2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2011.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Background.The need for timely, ethical, and high-quality reporting of clinical trial results has seen a rise in demand for publication professionals. These publication experts, who are not ghostwriters, work with leading medical researchers and funders around the world to plan and prepare thousands of publications each year. Despite the involvement of publication professionals in an increasing number of peer-reviewed publications, especially those that affect patient care, there is limited evidence-based guidance in the peer-reviewed literature on their publication practices. Similar to the push for editors and the peer-review community to conduct and publish research on publication ethics and the peer-review process, the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) has encouraged members to conduct and publish research on publication planning and practices. Our primary objective was to investigate the publication rate of research presented at ISMPP Annual Meetings.Methods.ISMPP Annual Meeting abstract lists (April 2009–April 2014) were searched in November 2014 and data were extracted into a pilot-tested spreadsheet. MEDLINE was searched in December 2014 to determine the publication rate (calculated as the % of presented abstracts published as full papers in peer-reviewed journals). Data were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test (significance:P< .05) by an independent academic statistician.Results.From 2009 to 2014, there were 220 abstracts submitted, 185 accepted, and 164 presented. There were four corresponding publications (publication rate 2.4%). Over time, ISMPP’s abstract acceptance rate (overall: 84.1%) did not change, but the number of abstracts presented increased significantly (P= .02). Most abstracts were presented as posters (81.1%) and most research was observational (72.6%). Most researchers came from the US (78.0%), followed by Europe (17.7%), and the Asia-Pacific region (11.2%).Discussion.Research presented at ISMPP Annual Meetings has rarely been published in peer-reviewed journals. The high rate of nonpublication by publication professionals has now been quantified and is of concern. Publication professionals should do more to contribute to evidence-based publication practices, including, and especially, their own. Unless the barriers to publication are identified and addressed, the practices of publication professionals, which affect thousands of peer-reviewed publications each year, will remain hidden and unproven.
9
Kendal, Dave, Kate E. Lee, Kylie Soanes i Caragh G. Threlfall. "‘The great publication race’ vs ‘abandon paper counting’: Benchmarking ECR publication and co-authorship rates over past 50 years to inform research evaluation". F1000Research 11 (26.01.2022): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.75604.1.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Background: Publication and co-authorship rates have been increasing over decades. In response, calls are being made to restrict the number of publications included in research evaluations. Yet there is little evidence to guide publication expectations and inform research evaluation for early career researchers (ECRs). Methods: Here we examine the early career publication and co-authorship records between 1970 and 2019 of >140,000 authors of 2.8 million publications, to identify how publication and co-authorship rates have changed over the last 50 years. This examination is conducted in order to develop benchmarks of median publication rates for sensibly evaluating ECR research productivity, and to explore success in meeting these benchmarks with different co-authorship strategies using regression models. Results: Publication rates of multidisciplinary ECRs publishing in Nature, Science and PNAS have increased by 46% over the last 50 years and that publications rates in a set of disciplinary journals have increased by 105%. Co-authorship rates have increased even more, particularly for the multidisciplinary sample which now has 572% more co-authors per publication. Benchmarks based on median publication rates for all authors increased from one publication per year at the start of a career, to four publications per year after 10 years of publishing, and one first-author publication across all years. The probability of meeting these benchmarks increases when authors publish with different co-authors, and first authorship rates decrease for ECRs with many co-authors per publication. Conclusion: This evidence could be used to inform sensible publishing expectations for ECRs and the institutions they work for, and to inform calls to limit the number of publications produced by researchers and those used in research evaluations.
10
King, Gary. "Publication, Publication". PS: Political Science & Politics 39, nr 01 (styczeń 2006): 119–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049096506060252.
Pełny tekst źródła
11
Block, A. Jay. "Duplicate Publication Duplicate Publication Duplicate Publication". CHEST Journal 115, nr 5 (1.05.1999): 1479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.115.5.1479.
Pełny tekst źródła
12
Hariyono, Eko, Titin Sunarti, Fenny Roshayanti, Hasan Nuurul Hidaayatullaah i Desi Wulandari. "Trends Research and Publication of Master Students in Science Education Program". Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram 10, nr 1 (30.01.2022): 104. http://dx.doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i1.4820.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
College students' creativity can be seen based on the novelty of research. The main objective of this study was to analyze trends research and publicationof the master of science education at the State University of Surabaya. The descriptive qualitative method used in this study. The data of this study collected by analyse the last five years research abstracts from 2015 to 2020. The data obtained were analyzed using a total sampling technique. Research trends and publication in the Master of Science education at the State University of Surabaya are mostly researching about the development of learning tools with qualitative-quantitative methods and research topics about innovative learning in the field of thinking skills. Some college student research uses curriculum topics, learning media, and assessments. While the publication trend is obtained by analyzing the publication of student articles resulting from the thesis based on the analysis of publications in the category of international and national journals. Department heads need policy recommendations in making decisions to improve research trends and college student publications. current study result implies that research trends in the Master of Science education at the State University of Surabaya require further innovation.
13
Böckmann, Eva C., E. S. Debus i R. T. Grundmann. "Publication activity of chief and consultant general/visceral surgeons in German university hospitals—a ten-year analysis". Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 406, nr 5 (26.07.2021): 1659–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02241-6.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Abstract Purpose The publication activity of 38 German general/visceral surgery university departments, documented by first or last authorship from staff surgeons (chief and consultants), was evaluated. Methods The observation period extended from 2007 to 2017 and all PubMed-listed publications were considered. Impact factor (IF) was evaluated through the publishing journal’s 5-year IF in 2016, as was the IF for each individual publication. Ranking was expressed in quartiles. Results The staff surgeons of the 38 departments comprised 442 surgeons, of which only 351 (79.4%) were active as first or last authors. Four thousand six hundred and ninety-nine publications published in 702 journals were recorded. The four leading departments in publication number published as much as the last 20 departments (1330 vs. 1336 publications, respectively). The mean of the first (most active) department quartile was 19.6 publications, the second 15.4, the third 11.0, and the last quartile 7.6 per publishing surgeon. The total cumulative impact factor was 14,130. When examining the mean number of publications per publishing surgeons per the 10 year period, the mean of the first quartile was 57.9 cumulative IF, the second 45.0, the third 29.5, and the fourth quartile 17.1. With 352 (7.5%) publications, the most frequently used journal was Chirurg, followed by Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery with 274 (5.8%) publications. Pancreas-related topics led in terms of publication number and IF generated per individual publication. Conclusion A significant difference in publication performance of individual departments was apparent that cannot be explained by staff number. This indicates that there are as yet unknown factors responsible for minor publication activity in many university departments.
14
Rasyad, Iqbal, i Gonda Yumitro. "Bibliometric analysis on the international publication of muslim brotherhood". Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences 3, nr 1 (30.07.2023): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.21924/chss.3.1.2023.54.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This article analyzes the trend of international publications related to the Muslim Brotherhood using the Scopus database. This study aims to determine the publication trends by region, subject area of publication, type of publication, number of documents for each author, and number of papers for each university. The data collected by the authors were taken from the search results in the Scopus database with a combination of the keywords "Ikhwanul Muslimin or Muslim Brotherhood" with the categories of article titles, article abstracts, and article keywords in the publication period of 1954 - 2023. Based on this search, the authors found 738 scientific publication documents related to the Muslim Brotherhood. The studies conducted in 2023 were 17 publications, and the highest number found by the authors was 69 scientific publications (9.3%) in 2016. The United States became the most productive country or region in scientific publications with 175 papers (23.7%). The most prolific authors are Ardovini and Brooke with eight articles. Bar-Ilan University became the affiliate with the most publications with 15 publications. Based on these results, the study of the Muslim Brotherhood became a contemporary study that has attracted the interest of researchers.
15
Kanagasundari, S., G. T. Kohila i N. Prasannakumari. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Authorship Productivity and Collaborative Research in Blogosphere". Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology 9, S1 (5.02.2019): 92–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2019.9.s1.214.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
An analysis of 718 publications published by social area on Blogosphere during 2002-2018 and indexed by web of science online Database indicates that the publication output in the Global Research Publications. The highest numbers of papers were published during the year 2010 and 2013 with 76 records, the followed by 72 papers in 2009, 69 papers in 2015 and 67 records of the publication in the year 2011. The least number of publication in the years 2002, 2003 and 2004 with only one record of the publications due to the initial stage of web developments. Overall, 1368 authors contributed 520 publications in the journal and institutions with 668 records of the articles. Contribution of journals, ranking of authors, preference of publication and frequency of keywords were also analysed in this paper.
16
Kun, Ádám. "Time to Acceptance of 3 Days for Papers About COVID-19". Publications 8, nr 2 (3.06.2020): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications8020030.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Time to acceptance from submission and time to publication (publication lag) determines how quickly novel information is made available to other scientists and experts. In the medical field, the review process and revisions usually takes 3–4 months; the total time from submission to publication is 8–9 months. During the COVID-19 pandemic, information should be available much faster. The analysis of 833 documents published on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 prior to 19 March 2020 shows that these times shrunk by a factor of ten. The median time to acceptance was three days for all publications, six days for research papers and reviews, four days for case studies and two days for other publication types. The median publication lag was nine days for all publications together, 11 days for research papers, nine days for case studies, 13 days for reviews and seven days for other publications. This demonstrates that the publication process—if necessary—can be sped up. For the sake of scientific accuracy, review times should not be pushed down, but the time from acceptance to actual publication could be shorter.
17
Zhang, Gupeng, Libin Xiong, Xiao Wang, Jianing Dong i Hongbo Duan. "Artificial selection versus natural selection: Which causes the Matthew effect of science funding allocation in China?" Science and Public Policy 47, nr 3 (3.05.2020): 434–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa024.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Abstract To investigate either artificial or natural selection leads to the Matthew effect in the science funding allocation and its consequences, this study retrieves 274,732 publications by Chinese scientists from the Web of Science and examines how the disparity of science funding determines scientists’ research performance. We employ the Negative Binomial Model and other models to regress the publication’s citation times, which measures the research performance, on the number of funding grants and their amounts of currency that the publication receives, which measures the disparity of science funding. The empirical results suggest an inverted U-shaped relationship. However, the optimum number of funding grants far exceeds the actual number that most publications receive, implying that increasing the funding for academic research positively impacts scientists’ research performance. The natural disparity thus plays a major role in distributing the science funding. Additionally, China’s publication-based academic assessment system may be another main cause.
18
Bu, Yi, Ludo Waltman i Yong Huang. "A multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications". Quantitative Science Studies 2, nr 1 (2021): 155–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00109.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Abstract The citation impact of a scientific publication is usually seen as a one-dimensional concept. We introduce a multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of a publication. In addition to the level of citation impact, quantified by the number of citations received by a publication, we also conceptualize and operationalize the depth and breadth and the dependence and independence of the citation impact of a publication. The proposed framework distinguishes between publications that have a deep citation impact, typically in a relatively narrow research area, and publications that have a broad citation impact, probably covering a wider area of research. It also makes a distinction between publications that are strongly dependent on earlier work and publications that make a more independent scientific contribution. We use our multidimensional citation impact framework to report basic descriptive statistics on the citation impact of highly cited publications in all scientific disciplines. In addition, we present a detailed case study focusing on the field of scientometrics. The proposed citation impact framework provides a more in-depth understanding of the citation impact of a publication than a traditional one-dimensional perspective.
19
Rahimova, Nailay. "Analysis of publication activity at research institutes". Scientific and Technical Libraries, nr 11 (1.11.2016): 44–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2016-11-44-50.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Publication activity of TatNIPIneft institute for 5-year period (2011-2015), research papers citation (data of the Russian Science Citation Index), average number of citations per publication, distribution by publication types, are analyzed. The core periodicals for the Institute’s staff publications, their impact factors and the Supreme Attestation Commission’s and international analytic databases inclusion are specified. The rating of TatNIPIneft researchers by the number of publications is given.
20
Alim, Nur, Titin Retnawati i Syamsuddin Syamsuddin. "Peranan Media Sosial Facebook Dalam Manajemen Publikasi Informasi Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan Iain Kendari". Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian 13, nr 2 (29.11.2018): 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/ai.v13i2.955.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This study discusses the role of social media in the management of information publications Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty of IAIN Kendari. The results of the study showed that the management of information publication at the Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty of IAIN Kendari was divided into four stages. First, the planning stage, which includes analysis of information to be published, namely academic, student or general information, related parties involved in the publication, namely the leadership of the Tarbiyah Faculty and administrative staff. As well as media publications to be used, namely Facebook social media and print media. Second, the organizing stage, namely the administration of the Tarbiyah Faculty has five administrative staff in charge of organizing information publications. Third, the implementation stage, this information publication was carried out by administrative staff as well as the head of the Tarbiyah Faculty administration section through the use of print media and Facebook. The last stage is supervision, where faculty leaders are involved in supervising the publication of that information. The role of Facebook in the management of information publications at the Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty of IAIN Kendari consists of three roles, namely information optimization, ease of publication and access to information, and has interesting features in information publication
21
Carvalho, Christopher, Matthew Fuller, Emmanuel Quaidoo, Ahson Haider, Jonathan Rodriguez, Angela Wong, Mindy Duong i Robert Rodriguez. "A Review of COVID-19-Related Publications and Lag Times During the First Six Months of the Year 2020". Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 22, nr 4 (29.06.2021): 958–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.3.51737.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Introduction: Considering the need for information regarding approaches to prevention and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we sought to determine publication lag times of COVID-19-related original research articles published in top general medicine and emergency medicine (EM) journals. We further sought to characterize the types of COVID-19 publications within these journals. Methods: We reviewed 125 top-ranked general medicine journals and 20 top-ranked EM-specific journals for COVID-19-related publications. We abstracted article titles and manuscript details for each COVID-19-related article published between January 1–June 30, 2020, and categorized articles as one of the following: original research; case report; review; or commentary. We abstracted data for preprint publications over the same time period and determined whether articles from the general medicine and EM journals had been previously published as preprint articles. Our primary outcomes were the following: 1) lag time (days) between global cumulative World Health Organization (WHO)-confirmed cases of COVID-19 and publications; 2) lag times between preprint article publication and peer-reviewed journal publication; and 3) lag times between submission and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Our secondary outcome was to characterize COVID-19-related publications. Results: The first original research publications appeared in a general medicine journal 20 days and in an EM journal 58 days after the first WHO-confirmed case of COVID-19. We found median and mean lag times between preprint publications and journal publications of 32 days (19, 49) and 36 days (22) for general medicine journals, and 26 days (16, 36) and 25 days (13) for EM journals. Median and mean lag times between submission and publication were 30 days (19, 45) and 35 days (13) for general medicine journals, and 23 days (11, 39) and 27 days (19) for EM journals. Of 2530 general medicine journal articles and 351 EM journal articles, 28% and 23.6% were original research. We noted substantial closing of the preprint to peer-reviewed publication (160 days pre-pandemic) and peer-reviewed journal submission to publication (194 days pre-pandemic) lag times for COVID-19 manuscripts. Conclusion: We found a rapid and robust response with shortened publication lag times to meet the need for the publication of original research and other vital medical information related to COVID-19 during the first six months of 2020.
22
Bhattacharyya, Rituparna. "Publication Watch". Space and Culture, India 1, nr 2 (28.11.2013): 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.20896/saci.v1i2.32.
Pełny tekst źródła
23
Schneijderberg, Christian, Nicolai Götze i Lars Müller. "A study of 25 years of publication outputs in the German academic profession". Scientometrics 127, nr 1 (styczeń 2022): 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04216-2.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
AbstractIn the weak evaluation state of Germany, full professors are involved in the traditional social governance partnership between the state, and the self-governing higher education institutions (HEI) and disciplinary associations. Literature suggests that formal and informal governance could trigger changes in academics’ publication behavior by valorizing certain publication outputs. In the article, secondary data from three surveys (1992, 2007 and 2018) is used for a multi-level study of the evolution of academics’ publication behavior. We find a trend toward the “model” of natural science publication behavior across all disciplines. On the organizational level, we observe that a strong HEI research performance orientation is positively correlated with journal articles, peer-reviewed publications, and co-publications with international co-authors. HEI performance-based funding is only positively correlated with the share of peer-reviewed publications. At the level of individual disciplines, humanities and social sciences scholars adapt to the peer-reviewed journal publication paradigm of the natural sciences at the expense of book publications. Considering how the academic profession is organized around reputation and status, it seems plausible that the academic profession and its institutional oligarchy are key contexts for the slow but steady change of academics’ publication behavior. The trend of changing academics’ publication behavior is partly related to HEI valorization of performance and (to a lesser extent) to HEI performance based-funding schemes, which are set by the strong academic profession in the weak evaluation state of Germany.
24
Hansson, Joacim, Jukka Tyrkkö, Koraljka Golub i Ida Ahlström. "Publication practices in the Humanities". Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies 2, nr 2 (15.12.2021): 41–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v2i2.125238.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This paper is a case study of research publication practices at the Faculty of Arts and Humanities at Linnaeus University, a young, mid-sized university in the south-east of Sweden. Research output was measured from publications in the local institutional repository following the guidelines of local research policy as defined in university documentation. The data collection comprised 3,316 metadata records of publications self-registered by authors affiliated with the faculty during the period of 2010–2018. A statistical analysis of research output was conducted, focusing on preferred publication types, disciplinary specificity, level of co-authorship, and the language of the publication as registered in the local repository. The analysis focused on two main research questions: 1) how do the local research practices stand in relation to traditional publication patterns in the humanities? 2) how do the observed publication patterns relate to local university policy on publication and research evaluation? The empirical results suggest a limited correlation between publication practices and research incentives from university management, a finding that is corroborated by previous research on the scholarly character of the humanities and university policies. Overall, traditional humanities publication patterns were largely maintained throughout the period under investigation.
25
Lin, Wei-Chao, Chih-Fong Tsai i Shih-Wen Ke. "Correlation analysis for comparison of the citation impact of journals, magazines, and conferences in computer science". Online Information Review 39, nr 3 (8.06.2015): 310–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/oir-11-2014-0273.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Purpose – In many research areas, there are a variety of different types of academic publications, including journals, magazines and conferences, which provide outlets for researchers to present their findings. Generally speaking, although there are differences in the reviewing criteria and publication processes of different publication types, in the same research area, there is certainly overlap in terms of the problems addressed and the audience for different publication types. Therefore, the research impacts of different publication types in the same research area should be moderately or highly correlated. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – To prove this hypothesis, the authors examine the correlation coefficient of citation impacts for different types of publications, in seven research areas of computer science, from 2000 to 2013. In particular, four related citation statistics are examined for each publication type, which are average citations per paper, average citations per year, average annual increase in individual h-index, and h-index. Findings – The analysis results show only a partial correlation in terms of several specific citation measures for different publication types in the same research area. Moreover, the level of correlation of the citation impact between different publication types is different, depending on the research area. Originality/value – The contribution of this paper is to investigate whether the research impact of different types of publications in the same area is correlated. The findings can help guide researchers and academics choose the most appropriate publication outlets.
26
AKINFEEVA, Ekaterina V., i Mariya A. NIKONOVA. "Analyzing the publication activity effectiveness of a scientific organization based on the Citation Index (the CEMI RAS case)". Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice 21, nr 10 (27.10.2022): 1877–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.24891/ea.21.10.1877.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Subject. The article addresses the assessment of publication activities effectiveness of an organization engaged in scientific research in the humanities, carried out on the basis of citation indexes of publications of employees. Objectives. The purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of publication activities of a scientific organization and its employees, based on indicators of citation level, the number of publications, the Hirsch index. Methods. The study rests on general scientific research methods. Results. We performed a comparative analysis of publication activities of three institutes engaged in research in the field of economics, presented an overview of Russian databases, i.e. the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI), the eLibrary platform, analyzed the effectiveness of publication activities of scientific researchers of the Central Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences by field of science and by academic position, using the indicators of citation index (Hirsch index), the number of publications included in the RSCI, and the number of references from the RSCI. Our analysis demonstrated high efficiency of the CEMI RAS, which to a greater extent depends on the publication activities of its staff in the position of chief and leading researchers. Conclusions. The existing system for evaluating the publication activities of scientific organizations, which rests on quantitative indicators, is effective, though not sufficiently informative. It is required to expand the list of indicators and conduct a peer review of researchers’ publications.
27
Vorobjov, Andrey Arturovich, Mikhail Mikhailovich Gorbunov-Possadov, Alexey Viktorovitch Ermakov, Tatyana Alekseevna Polilova i Rimma Yuryevna Skornyakova. "Chronology of scientific publication". Keldysh Institute Preprints, nr 38 (2022): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.20948/prepr-2022-38.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
The purpose and ways of presentation of key dates characterizing individual stages of the life cycle of scientific publication are considered. For the author who plans to publish his work in a particular journal, the most significant dates are the dates of the preliminary stages: reviewing, proofreading, layout, etc. The key date, usually reflected in a bibliographic reference to a published work, is the year of its publication. With the advent of the Internet, alive publications have become widespread. The authors of alive publications constantly keep their work up to date, eliminating the noted inaccuracies and, most importantly, reflecting the latest achievements in the field under consideration. For the reader, the main interest here is the date of posting online of the latest, recent version of the publication.
28
Gerber, Reto, i Mark D. Robinson. "pubassistant.ch: consolidating publication profiles of researchers". F1000Research 10 (20.12.2021): 989. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73493.2.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Online accounts to keep track of scientific publications, such as Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) or Google Scholar, can be time consuming to maintain and synchronize. Furthermore, the open access status of publications is often not easily accessible, hindering potential opening of closed publications. To lessen the burden of managing personal profiles, we developed a R shiny app that allows publication lists from multiple platforms to be retrieved and consolidated, as well as interactive exploration and comparison of publication profiles. A live version can be found at pubassistant.ch.
29
Gerber, Reto, i Mark D. Robinson. "pubassistant.ch: consolidating publication profiles of researchers". F1000Research 10 (13.04.2022): 989. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73493.3.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Online accounts to keep track of scientific publications, such as Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) or Google Scholar, can be time consuming to maintain and synchronize. Furthermore, the open access status of publications is often not easily accessible, hindering potential opening of closed publications. To lessen the burden of managing personal profiles, we developed a R shiny app that allows publication lists from multiple platforms to be retrieved and consolidated, as well as interactive exploration and comparison of publication profiles. A live version can be found at pubassistant.ch.
30
Gerber, Reto, i Mark D. Robinson. "pubassistant.ch: consolidating publication profiles of researchers". F1000Research 10 (30.09.2021): 989. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73493.1.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Online accounts to keep track of scientific publications, such as Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) or Google Scholar, can be time consuming to maintain and synchronize. Furthermore, the open access status of publications is often not easily accessible, hindering potential opening of closed publications. To lessen the burden of managing personal profiles, we developed a R shiny app that allows publication lists from multiple platforms to be retrieved and consolidated, as well as interactive exploration and comparison of publication profiles. A live version can be found at pubassistant.ch.
31
Rahardja, Untung, Ninda Lutfiani i Hega Lutfilah Juniar. "Scientific Publication Management Transformation In Disruption Era". Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM) 3, nr 2 (26.07.2019): 109–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.33050/atm.v3i2.1008.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
New innovations enter the market and create a strong disruption effect, a sign that the era of the decade that is currently happening has experienced many changes in various sectors, including economics, technology, education and politics. This study aims to examine the aspects and direction of the development of research related to the Disruption Age that affects technological developments, one of which is in the field of publication management. The approach used is a study of various definitions and model frameworks that developed around the era of disruption and management of publications as well as mapping and analysis of a number of publications. Judging from the research method, most of the research was carried out through descriptive and conceptual methods in which technological aspects became the focus of research by researchers. Disruption innovation has an impact on publication management, where publication management is increasingly developing with additional technological spices. Management of online-based scientific publications or e-journals that are able to manage scientific publication activities to create better management and publications and improve accessibility. The Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education targets 7,000 nationally accredited journals with six ratings. In 2018 there were 20,610 internationally published scientific works in Indonesia. The application of this online-based or e-journal scientific publication management system is able to improve the quality of the process of managing scientific journals to be more systematic and organized to achieve efficiency and improve publications to be global.
Keywords: Disruption, Innovation, Scientific Publication Management, Technology.
32
Haunschild, Robin, i Lutz Bornmann. "Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers". Scientometrics 126, nr 6 (26.04.2021): 5181–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03962-7.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
AbstractMethodological mistakes, data errors, and scientific misconduct are considered prevalent problems in science that are often difficult to detect. In this study, we explore the potential of using data from Twitter for discovering problems with publications. In this case study, we analyzed tweet texts of three retracted publications about COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019)/SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) and their retraction notices. We did not find early warning signs in tweet texts regarding one publication, but we did find tweets that casted doubt on the validity of the two other publications shortly after their publication date. An extension of our current work might lead to an early warning system that makes the scientific community aware of problems with certain publications. Other sources, such as blogs or post-publication peer-review sites, could be included in such an early warning system. The methodology proposed in this case study should be validated using larger publication sets that also include a control group, i.e., publications that were not retracted.
33
Ikramunnisa, Erica, Surya Mahardika, Afandi Afandi i Yanti Sri Rezeki. "Bibliometric Analysis on EFL Publication Trends in 2011-2021 Using VOSviewer". Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature 22, nr 2 (30.12.2022): 259–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.24167/celt.v22i2.4718.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This study provides a comprehensive overview of current publication patterns in the field of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). In this research, the trends investigated are publication and citation growth, researcher’s productivity, and the most impactful publications. In addition to the publication trends, network visualizations of the terms co-occurrence and co-authorship are also presented in this research. A quantitative descriptive method with bibliometric analysis is employed as the research design of this research. The data analyzed are 6333 journal articles related to EFL published in 2011-2021. All of the data are obtained from the Scopus database. From the analysis using Scopus and Microsoft Excel, it was found that the highest publication growth in percent is in 2012 with a 98,6% of publication increase, and the highest publication growth in number is in 2020 with a total of 310 more publications compared to the previous year. Using the same tools, the researchers also found that the most productive author is Karim Sadeghi with 10 publications, and the most cited publication is an article titled 'English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings' by David Lasagabaster. Meanwhile, from the network visualizations using VOSviewer, the researchers concluded that there are two major research themes in EFL, namely pedagogy and affective factors in learning, and the most collaborative author based on the co-authorship analysis is Ehsan Namaziandost.
34
Riley, William T., Katrina Bibb, Sara Hargrave i Paula Fearon. "Publication rates from biomedical and behavioral and social science R01s funded by the National Institutes of Health". PLOS ONE 15, nr 11 (13.11.2020): e0242271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242271.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Prior research has shown a serious lack of research transparency resulting from the failure to publish study results in a timely manner. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has increased its use of publication rate and time to publication as metrics for grant productivity. In this study, we analyze the publications associated with all R01 and U01 grants funded from 2008 through 2014, providing sufficient time for these grants to publish their findings, and identify predictors of time to publication based on a number of variables, including if a grant was coded as a behavioral and social sciences research (BSSR) grant or not. Overall, 2.4% of the 27,016 R01 and U01 grants did not have a publication associated with the grant within 60 months of the project start date, and this rate of zero publications was higher for BSSR grants (4.6%) than for non-BSSR grants (1.9%). Mean time in months to first publication was 15.2 months, longer for BSSR grants (22.4 months) than non-BSSR grants (13.6 months). Survival curves showed a more rapid reduction of risk to publish from non-BSSR vs BSSR grants. Cox regression models showed that human research (vs. animal, neither, or both) and clinical trials research (vs. not) are the strongest predictors of time to publication and failure to publish, but even after accounting for these and other predictors, BSSR grants continued to show longer times to first publication and greater risk of no publications than non-BSSR grants. These findings indicate that even with liberal criteria for publication (any publication associated with a grant), a small percentage of R01 and U01 grantees fail to publish in a timely manner, and that a number of factors, including human research, clinical trial research, child research, not being an early stage investigator, and conducting behavioral and social sciences research increase the risk of time to first publication.
35
Rees, Tomas. "Obtaining meaningful insights from publication metrics". Medical Writing 31, nr 4 (19.12.2022): 50–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.56012/vjht8689.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Altmetrics and other article-level metrics offer new opportunities to understand the impact of medical publications and, indeed, clinical trial programmes. For example, we can learn whether the publication has been viewed, shared, engaged with, or cited on different platforms. These metrics have limitations, but new tools and techniques for aggregating and summarising different metrics are making it easier for publication planners to understand the impact of their publications.
36
Verpoorte, Rob. "Publication misconduct: Redundant publication". Journal of Ethnopharmacology 129, nr 2 (maj 2010): 141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.03.002.
Pełny tekst źródła
37
Kim, You Sun, i Dong Soo Han. "Analysis of consultations by the Committee for Publication Ethics of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors". Science Editing 7, nr 2 (20.08.2020): 184–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.6087/kcse.215.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This study aimed to analyze the inquiries on research and publication ethics submitted to the Committee for Publication Ethics of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. A total of 80 inquiries were initiated over the course of 3 years, from April 2017 to March 2020. Based on a categorization of these inquiries, four common topics are discussed in detail. We present specific cases derived from actual situations, and the steps taken in processing these inquiries. The number of inquiries by topic was as follows: duplicate publications (12), secondary publications (11), authorship disputes (11), informed consent (6), proceedings (5), copyright (5), institutional review board approval (5), plagiarism (4), corrections (4), and others (17). Cases of duplicate publication and authorship disputes can be treated according to the flow chart of the Committee on Publication Ethics of the United Kingdom. Secondary publications may be permitted if the readers or audiences are different and both journals’ editors grant permission. Editors should be cautious about publishing cases without informed consent, even in the absence of identifiable photos, because patients or their families may be able to identify the cases. An adequate awareness of ethical considerations relevant to publication can help reduce the number of instances of research and publication ethics misconduct.
38
Thompson, Dennis F., i Larry W. Segars. "Publication Rates in U.S. Schools and Colleges of Pharmacy, 1976–1992". Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy 15, nr 4 (8.07.1995): 487–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-9114.1995.tb04386.x.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
To establish publication rates of U.S. schools and colleges of pharmacy (SCOP) for 1976–1992, we obtained data from the Science Citation Index (SCI) Corporate Index. The SCI data base covers the top 4500 journals in the technical and scientific fields. Citations were counted without regard to publication type (letter, abstract, review, etc.). Duplicative publications were eliminated. Faculty counts were obtained from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Roster of Faculty and Staff for the inclusive years. Total publications for all schools increased over 100% from 1976 to 1992, and the number of faculty members increased by 40% during that time. However, only 12 (16%) of the SCOP averaged 50 or more publications/year, whereas 43 (59%) averaged fewer than 20. Data were also normalized by full‐time faculty members. Only 13 (18%) SCOP averaged 1.0 or more publication/faculty/year, and 38 (52%) averaged fewer than 0.5. Publication rates were greater for medical center‐based than for nonmedical center‐based SCOP (p<0.05), and for public than for private SCOP (p<0.05). These data suggest that over half of the existing SCOP are minimally productive, generating less than 20 publications/year or 0.5 publication/faculty/year.
39
Hutter, M., i H. E. Peterson. "IMIA’s Publication History". Yearbook of Medical Informatics 16, nr 01 (sierpień 2007): 192–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1638548.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
SummaryThis article lines out the various publications by which IMIA presents its work and the state-of-the art of health and biomedical informatics.A short history of IMIA and its publications is presented, a reference list completes the view.IMIA looks back on a long and fruitful publication history of more than a hundred publications.Starting from its foundation in 1967, IMIA has continually published the results of its activities and conferences, these publications being one of the most visible proofs of the liveliness and up-to-dateness of the organization and the field.
40
Suprapto, Nadi, Woro Setyarsih i Husni Mubarok. "Information Spectrum over Twelve Public Teaching Universities in Indonesia". DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 42, nr 4 (19.07.2022): 265–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.42.4.17880.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This paper gives an information spectrum of public teaching universities in Indonesia as viewed from their publication during 2000-2019. The data were collected through the Scopus database and then analysed based on the number of documents, language, author affiliation, document type, source type, source title, top authors, top citations, co-authorship, and international collaboration. The results indicated that the number of publications until 2019 was 11,993 documents. In the period 2016-2019, publication stretches have begun to appear, and there has been a significant increase in the number of conference proceedings as the primary source of publication. The publication’s subject area was dominated by physics and astronomy, engineering, and social sciences, with English being the primary language of communication. Authors from Universitas Negeri Malang (UM), Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), and Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (UNY) dominated the output of public teaching universities in Indonesia. Top citations from documents produced were dominated by UNNES, which collaborates a lot through World Class Professor (WCP). Co-citation, co-authorship, and co-occurrences network visualisation were also illustrated to complete the information of top authors and top citations in this study. The most collaborated authors of public-teaching universities were Malaysia, the USA, Australia, Japan, and Taiwan. Some future considerations were also illustrated as the recommendation of this study to increase the performance of publications among public teaching universities.
41
Gan, Jen Ling, i Halimah Mohd Yusof. "A Global Research Trend on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: A Bibliometric Analysis". Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies 2, nr 1 (28.07.2020): 55–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v2i1.1295.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
There are limited literatures that discussed on the trend of OCB. Hence, this bibliometric analysis is aimed to evaluate the global research growth to retrieve and analyse the publication on OCB. The bibliometric analysis is used to search the database of Scopus from the oldest publication in 1988 to the recent publication in 2019. The objectives were to evaluate the output of publications, co-authorship, leading countries and institutions, top authors, and co-occurrences of author keywords. This study used VOS Viewer 1.6.11 to analyse and visualise the global research trend on OCB in analysing the bibliographic data. Bibliometric maps were retrieved from VOS Viewer 1.6.11. This study retrieved 2, 356 journal articles from Scopus database from 1988 to 2019. The publication’s trend revealed that the number of publications has been increasing steadily since 2002. The leading countries in OCB research are the United States and China. Among the fifteen leading universities, five of them were from the world’s top 150 universities. Among the keywords, ‘commitment’ has the most link with OCB, which indicated that OCB is active in the management field compared to other fields such as nursing and psychology. This paper can be beneficial for academicians, organisations, and business policymakers in understanding the global trend of OCB besides discovering the future directions and opportunities for future studies.
42
Kasatkin, P. I., J. A. Kovalchuk i I. M. Stepnov. "The Financial Component of the Scientific Publication’s Value Original article". Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia 31, nr 12 (21.12.2022): 85–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-12-85-102.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Publication activity in modern society is presented as a driving force of scientific and technological development and as an indicator of university management reporting. The article is devoted to the study of approaches to determining the monetary value of a scientific publication, taking into account different behavior’s motives of researchers and teachers in higher education as authors. The methodological basis of the study was formed by concepts of creating a public good and financial good, concepts of scientific productivity and academic remuneration, neoclassical and neoinstitutional economic theories, approaches to the implementation of state policy in the field of science and education in terms of stimulating scientific publications. Research methods: critical and comparative analysis, with the inclusion of three groups of methods: a) the study of direct and indirect authors’ motives and traps in the publication of scientific papers; b) asset evaluation methods; c) a combination of socio-economic campaigns for monetary evaluation of the results of scientific research. Asset valuation approaches have been adapted to assess the scientific publication’s value from the position of the author as a beneficiary. The theoretical and practical significance of the research lies in the contribution to the value dimension of scientific publications for their authors in the conditions of academic capitalism with potential opportunities to receive monetary income from the results of their research.
43
Sharma, Mohan Raj, i Namita Ghimire. "Research and publication ethics in developing countries". Nepal Journal of Neuroscience 18, nr 3 (1.09.2021): 3–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njn.v18i3.37143.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
The scientific validity of any project relies heavily on the ethically conducted and published research work. Conducting good quality research and publishing it in a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal is the ultimate dream of any researcher. However if not done without any research and publication ethics, the work will be counterproductive. Fortunately, there are several publications on ethics of research and publication guiding an early-stage researcher to follow the underlying principles. Research ethics include upholding the basic ethical principles of human research, namely, respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Publication ethics involve not committing scientific misconduct, resolving authorship disputes, and avoiding simultaneous submission and duplicate publication. Repercussions of unethical research and publications are often unforgiving. Researchers in developing countries face unique challenges in this regard. However, at no cost should these principles be ignored. This will promote the development of a healthy research and publication culture, so desperately needed in these populations. Researchers, sponsors, ethical boards, publishers, and editors should work hand-in-hand to safeguard the research and publication integrity. In this review, issues surrounding research and publication ethics relevant to developing countries will be discussed.
44
Prasad, Vinay, Jason Rho, Senthil Selvaraj, Mike Cheung, Andrae Vandross i Nancy Ho. "Can a Resident's Publication Record Predict Fellowship Publications?" PLoS ONE 9, nr 3 (21.03.2014): e90140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090140.
Pełny tekst źródła
45
Bain, C. R., i P. S. Myles. "Relationship between Journal Impact Factor and Levels of Evidence in Anaesthesia". Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 33, nr 5 (październik 2005): 567–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0503300503.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Evidence-based medicine uses a hierarchy of publication types according to their vulnerability to bias. A widely used measure of journal “quality” is its impact factor, which describes the citation rate of its publications. We investigated the relationship between impact factor for eight anaesthesia journals and publication type with respect to their level of evidence 1-4 using Spearman rank correlation (rho). There were 1418 original publications during 2001 included in the analysis. The number (%) of publication types according to evidence-based medicine level were: level 1: 6 (0.4%), level 2: 533 (38%) level 3: 329 (23%), level 4: 550 (39%). There was no correlation between journal ranking according to impact factor and publication type (rho=–0.03, P=0.25). The correlation between journal rank and the proportion of publications that were randomized trials was –0.35 (P<0.001). The correlation between journal rank and number of publications was 0.65 (P<0.001). The correlation between journal rank and number of level 1 or 2 studies was 0.58 (P<0.001). The overall level of evidence published in anaesthesia journals was high. Journal rank according to impact factor is related to the number of publications, but not the proportion of publications that are evidence-based medicine level 1 or 2.
46
Hilbert, Fee, Julia Barth, Julia Gremm, Daniel Gros, Jessica Haiter, Maria Henkel, Wilhelm Reinhardt i Wolfgang G. Stock. "Coverage of academic citation databases compared with coverage of scientific social media". Online Information Review 39, nr 2 (13.04.2015): 255–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/oir-07-2014-0159.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how the coverage of publications is represented in information services. Academic citation databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar) and scientific social media (Mendeley, CiteULike, BibSonomy) were analyzed by applying a new method: the use of personal publication lists of scientists. Design/methodology/approach – Personal publication lists of scientists of the field of information science were analyzed. All data were taken in collaboration with the scientists in order to guarantee complete publication lists. Findings – The demonstrated calibration parameter shows the coverage of information services in the field of information science. None of the investigated databases reached a coverage of 100 percent. However Google Scholar covers a greater amount of publications than other academic citation databases and scientific social media. Research limitations/implications – Results were limited to the publications of scientists working at an information science department from 2003 to 2012 at German-speaking universities. Practical implications – Scientists of the field of information science are encouraged to review their publication strategy in case of quality and quantity. Originality/value – The paper confirms the usefulness of personal publication lists as a calibration parameter for measuring coverage of information services.
47
Trofimova, I. N. "Publication activities within the context of scientific policy goals: The bibliometric analysis". Scientific and Technical Libraries, nr 2 (22.02.2023): 59–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-59-79.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Science today is the key factor of social development and focus of the government policy. The published and globally acknowledged research results reflect the advance of the national science. The author assesses the publication activity of Russian scientists within the context of the goals of the national sci-tech policy. The newness and originality of the study lies in revealing and analyzing of intrinsic and extrinsic factors of publication activity. The author applied the method of comparing bibliometric indicators to characterize the works by Russian scientists in Scopus database. The goals of the study are: 1) to analyze publication activity structure and dynamics; 2) to define publication impact; and 3) to evaluate competitive strength and potential of publication activity of Russian scientists as compared to foreign researchers. Based on the bibliometric indicators, the author reveals heterodromous trends in Russian science. Traditionally, Russian science maintains its positions in the share of publications in leading journals, with the fast developing life sciences increasing the total number of publications; while the multidisciplinary studies make the most promising vector. The author concludes that despite increasing number of publications and their impact, their contribution to the global science continues to be a relevant problem.
48
Armendáriz, Germán Fernando Martínez, Villalba-Villadiego, Anuar, Andrea Damaris Hernández Allauca i Richard Ortega L. "Enhancing Learning in Mathematics Through Technology: Impact on Critical and Metacognitive Thinking". International Journal of Religion 5, nr 11 (6.06.2024): 233–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.61707/31xynw39.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
A documentary review was conducted on the production and publication of research papers related to ICT, Learning, and Mathematics. The purpose of the bibliometric analysis in this document was to understand the main characteristics of publications registered in the Scopus database from 2018-2023 by Latin American institutions, identifying 46 publications. The data was organized into graphs and figures, categorizing information by Year of Publication, Country of Origin, Area of Knowledge, and Type of Publication. Following this, a qualitative analysis referenced various authors' positions on the topic. Key findings revealed that Ecuador, with 11 publications, was the Latin American country with the highest scientific production attributed to authors affiliated with its institutions. The Area of Knowledge contributing most to the study of the impact of information and communication technologies on learning in mathematics was Social Sciences, with 27 published documents. The most frequently used Publication Type was Journal Articles, comprising 52% of the total scientific production during the specified period.
49
Gupta, Rishabh, Jeffrey Chen, Steven G. Roth, Naveed Kamal, Breanne Reisen, Alex Ortiz, Michael Feldman, Nishit Mummareddy, Jacob Jo i Lola Blackwell Chambless. "819 Pre-residency Research Output Amongst U.S. Neurological Surgery Residents". Neurosurgery 70, Supplement_1 (kwiecień 2024): 171–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002809_819.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
INTRODUCTION: Research productivity is often used in evaluating candidates for neurosurgery residency. Official Match data report successful candidates have on average ∼25 pre-residency research products; however, average number of indexed publications, the highest-valued research product, is not reported separate from other research products. METHODS: A list of all US neurosurgery residents who successfully matched between 2017-2021 was generated and narrowed to US MD seniors who applied to the authors’ institution. Each resident’s pre-residency publication quantity was extracted using Scopus. Additional variables were extracted from residency applications. RESULTS: 93.2% of all matched neurosurgery applicants from 2017 through 2021 were captured. Distribution of publication quantity was right skewed. Mean ± SD total, neuroscience-specific, and first-author pre-residency publications for applicants who matched in 2021 were 8.1 ± 10.0, 6.6 ± 8.7, and 2.3 ± 3.8 respectively. Median (IQR) total, neuroscience-specific, and first-author pre-residency publications were 5.0 (2.0, 11.0), 4.0 (1.5, 9.0), and 1.0 (0.0, 3.0) respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in average total, neuroscience-specific, and first-author publications from 2017 to 2021 (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an independent, positive association between class year and publication quantity (1.07 (0.71-1.42), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Indexed publications constitute a small portion of total research products successful neurosurgery candidates apply with. A high number of publications is not necessary to match with approximately 50% of all applicants who successfully matched having fewer than five publications and 25% having fewer than two. That said, average pre-residency publication quantity is increasing over time at a rate of approximately one publication per year.
50
Al-Farsi, Yahya M., Nawaf H. Albali, Muneera K. Alsaqabi, Mohammed Sayed, Adhra H. Al-Mawali i Samir Al-Adawi. "Period-prevalence and Publication Rate of Health Research Productivity in Seven Arabian Gulf Countries: Bibliometric Analysis from 1996 to 2018". Oman Medical Journal 36, nr 6 (22.11.2021): e316-e316. http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2021.100.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Objectives: Despite the worldwide increase in health research, few studies have evaluated the health research productivity in member states of the Gulf Health Council (GHC). This study solicited the period-prevalence and publication rates of health research productivity in the seven GHC countries. Methods: We searched the Scopus database for publications between 1996 and 2018 and used the SCImago Journal and Country Rank portal to obtain the relevant information. We also recorded qualitative (citation-based) and quantitative (document recount) indicators. Overall and country-specific period-prevalence and publication rates were estimated and standardized to the corresponding overall Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) population and country-specific population size. Results: Overall, 112 409 articles were enumerated during the study period. The majority (59.8%) were from Saudi Arabia, followed by UAE (11.9%). The GCC publications were associated with 1 315 778 citations, which revealed a 46.0 Hirsch-index. The period-prevalence of health publications for the overall GCC region was 1320 publications per million population over 22 years, and the publication rate estimate was 13.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.1–13.3) publication per 10 000 population. The highest publication rate estimate was noted in Qatar (36.5; 95% CI: 35.8–37.3), followed by Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Oman, and Yemen. Conclusions: This study is the first study in the context of GCC to utilize period-prevalence and publication rates to chart health research productivity in the GCC region. Concerted efforts are required to improve the quality and quantity of the health research output in the GCC region.