Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Program evaluation”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Spis treści
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Program evaluation”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Program evaluation"
Gleeson, Deborah, i Vera Boston. "A System for Program Evaluation in Community Health". Australian Journal of Primary Health 5, nr 4 (1999): 74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/py99053.
Pełny tekst źródłaParker, Kathryn, i Abhimanyu Sud. "Principles-Focused Evaluation: A Promising Practice in the Evaluation of Continuing Professional Development". Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 43, nr 4S (październik 2023): 64–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ceh.0000000000000535.
Pełny tekst źródłaTandon, Col Aseem, i Col Sushil Kumar. "Program Evaluation". Indian Journal of Anatomy 5, nr 1 (2016): 67–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ija.2320.0022.5116.11.
Pełny tekst źródłaSechrest, Lee, i Aurelio José Figueredo. "Program Evaluation". Annual Review of Psychology 44, nr 1 (styczeń 1993): 645–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.003241.
Pełny tekst źródłaBillue, Joyce S., i Gloria M. Clayton. "PROGRAM EVALUATION". Nurse Educator 13, nr 6 (listopad 1988): 8–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006223-198811000-00009.
Pełny tekst źródłaFarwell, Erin, i David Mungenast. "Program evaluation". Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 10, nr 1 (wrzesień 1994): 78–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00013614-199409000-00011.
Pełny tekst źródłaJohnson, Joyce H., i Nina Olesinski. "Program Evaluation". JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration 25, nr 1 (styczeń 1995): 53???60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005110-199501000-00010.
Pełny tekst źródłaHaleem, Diane M., Kathleen Evanina, Robin Gallagher, Mary Alice Golden, Kathleen Healy-Karabell i Wendy Manetti. "Program Evaluation". Nurse Educator 35, nr 3 (maj 2010): 118–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nne.0b013e3181d95000.
Pełny tekst źródłaCurl, Peggy, i Dora Bradley. "Program Evaluation". Clinical Nurse Specialist 19, nr 2 (marzec 2005): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002800-200503000-00020.
Pełny tekst źródłaGalaway, Burt. "Victim-Offender Reconciliation Program (VORP) Evaluation Issues". Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 3, nr 1 (marzec 1988): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.03.001.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Program evaluation"
Feldpausch, Andrea Marie. "Evaluating an Extension program: the Texas 4-H Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Program". Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4387.
Pełny tekst źródłaPatel, Leena. "Program Evaluation: Hunter-White Health Advocate Program". Thesis, The University of Arizona, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/297719.
Pełny tekst źródłaMULLER, GABRIELA. "PROGRAM EVALUATION FOR ENTERPRISE STANDARDIZATION PROGRAMS: A CASE STUDY". PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2009. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=32978@1.
Pełny tekst źródłaCONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO
O objetivo da dissertação é propor uma sistemática de avaliação para programas de normalização empresarial que integre as abordagens conceituais de avaliação de programas e de aprendizagem organizacional e que possa ser aplicada ao Programa de Normalização da Unidade de Terminais Aquaviários da Transpetro. No contexto organizacional no qual a pesquisa se insere, considera-se que a prática da avaliação pode gerar aprendizado organizacional, na medida em que permite a detecção de erros e sinaliza alternativas concretas de ação que gerem aumento da eficiência e da eficácia em suas operações. A motivação da pesquisa surgiu da necessidade da empresa em foco dispor de uma sistemática de avaliação para programas de normalização empresarial, capaz de mensurar a eficiência do referido Programa, em especial quanto ao grau de atendimento da Unidade de Terminais Aquaviários às normas e aos regulamentos técnicos do contexto socioprodutivo no qual a empresa atua. Quanto à metodologia adotada, a investigação da conexão entre avaliação de programas e normalização empresarial seguiu uma orientação preponderantemente dedutiva. Foi proposto um modelo teórico, e, a partir desse arcabouço conceitual, utilizou-se o caso do Programa como evidência empírica. Para tal, adotou-se o método de estudo de caso, tendo sido consideradas práticas de avaliação reportadas na literatura especializada. Destaca-se como resultado, uma sistemática inovadora para a avaliação de programas de normalização empresarial que integra as abordagens conceituais de avaliação de programas e de aprendizagem organizacional. Como conclusão, a pesquisa mostra que a sistemática de avaliação proposta mostrou-se adequada para os fins a que se destina, constituindo um importante instrumento de gestão e de aprendizagem que poderá ser disseminado em outros contextos organizacionais de normalização empresarial.
The objective of this dissertation is two-fold: (i) propose a program evaluation model for enterprise standardization programs based upon two conceptual and interlinked approaches: program evaluation and organizational learning; (ii) to validate the proposed model through a case study on Transpetro s Marine Terminals Standardization Program. In this context, evaluation practice may generate organizational learning to help Transpetro correct standardization program deviations and increase its efficiency and effectiveness towards operational excellence. As a matter of fact, standardization programs are necessary in marine terminals operations where standards are the minimum acceptable requirements to fulfill the goals for the operator, and the maximum requirements provided to the work for the contractor. Additionally, marine terminals should attend sector s regulations, occupational safety guidelines, and environmental management standards. The motivation of this research arose from Transpetro s need to have a program evaluation model capable of measuring efficiency of its Marine Terminals Standardization Program. The methodology encompasses: (i) literature survey on program evaluation and organizational learning; (ii) design of a standardization program evaluation model based on a conceptual framework which links both theoretical approaches; (iii) development of a case study on Transpetro s Marine Terminals Standardization Program; and (iv) formulation of conclusions and suggestions for future research and replication in other organizational contexts. The main results can be summarized as follows: (i) an innovative evaluation model to assess enterprise standardization programs; and (ii) a set of indicators for measuring efficiency and effectiveness of Transpetro s Marine Terminals Standardization Program. As a conclusion, it can be said that the proposed program evaluation model fulfilled expectations and assumptions formulated at the very beginning of this research. According to the opinion of Transpetro s managers and teams involved, the model is a useful management and learning tool for enterprise standardization initiatives and has a large potential for replication in other organizational contexts from the empirical evidences achieved.
Culver, Rebecca E. "Program evaluation: marriage and family therapy programs' multicultural competency". Diss., Kansas State University, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/8556.
Pełny tekst źródłaDepartment of Family Studies and Human Services
Joyce Baptist
The purpose of the current study is to examine what factors contribute to how marriage and family therapy (MFT) programs address multicultural competency training and to understand the support mechanisms of the training process. A sequential explanatory mixed-method design was utilized to evaluate MFT training programs. First, a Multicultural Survey, adapted from the Multicultural Competency Checklist (Ponterotto, Alexander, & Griegor, 1995), was used to gain a preliminary understanding of the masters MFT field regarding multitcultural competency training. Out of the 70 MFT program directors contacted, 39 program directors or program representatives responded to the survey (55.71% response). Qualitative interviews from 8 participants (program directors, n = 7; program representative, n = 1) representing each geographical region (Northeast, n = 2; South, n = 2; Midwest, n = 2; West, n = 2) were used to examine programs’ multicultural competency training content, program context and training processes. Five themes emerged from the data: 1) internal program dynamic, 2) external program factors, 3) stakeholders, 4) faculty recruitment, and 5) cross-program collaboration. General systems theory, process theory and the logic model were utilized to conceptualize the results (Kellogg, 2004; Rossi, Lipsey, & Freeman, 2004; White & Klein, 2002).
Hinds, Drew Samuel Wayne. "Evaluating Alternative High Schools| Program Evaluation in Action". Thesis, Portland State University, 2013. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3587104.
Pełny tekst źródłaAlternative high schools serve some of the most vulnerable students and their programs present a significant challenge to evaluate. Determining the impact of an alternative high school that serves mostly at-risk students presented a significant research problem. Few studies exist that dig deeper into the characteristics and strategies of successful alternative schooling. Moreover valid program evaluation methods to identify successful alternative school practices are hit and miss. As a result, public policy and systems of accountability have either disregarded information relating to alternative high schools or unjustifiably included them in comparisons with traditional high schools.
This dissertation studied the issue of how best to evaluate alternative high schools and what tools support leaders in planning a thorough and accurate program evaluation. The Alternative High School Program Evaluation Toolkit was developed to support school leaders and evaluation teams made up of internal and external stakeholders as they facilitate the program evaluation process. The features of the Toolkit address the need for alternative school evaluation to be practical, useful, fair and accurate. The Evaluation Toolkit includes training materials, protocols, an evaluation planning worksheet and an evaluation planning matrix that supports the team in conducting the evaluation.
The research represented in this dissertation is theoretically and practically grounded in Bridges and Hallinger's (1995) Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Borg and Gall's (1989) Research and Development (R&D) Cycle. The product of the R&D Cycle was the Alternative High School Program Evaluation Toolkit and a process for use by evaluation teams assigned the task of planning and carrying out program evaluations.
Oloyede, Hannah. "Positive Impact Program Evaluation". Digital Archive @ GSU, 2012. http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/iph_theses/238.
Pełny tekst źródłaHundley, Linda Louise. "A Program Evaluation of an Integrative Wellness Program". Diss., The University of Arizona, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/196117.
Pełny tekst źródłaGeraghty, Shiloh. "Program evaluation on Centennial Middle School's counseling program". Online version, 2000. http://www.uwstout.edu/lib/thesis/2000/2000geraghtys.pdf.
Pełny tekst źródłaPacheco, Christy Lee. "Program Evaluation of a County Reproductive Health Program". Diss., The University of Arizona, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/228158.
Pełny tekst źródłaSchultz, Spencer. "Program Evaluation of a Rich Media Implementation Program". ScholarWorks, 2019. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/7742.
Pełny tekst źródłaKsiążki na temat "Program evaluation"
Schalock, Robert L., i Craig V. D. Thornton. Program Evaluation. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3508-3.
Pełny tekst źródłaLinfield, Kenneth J., i Emil J. Posavac. Program Evaluation. 9th edition. | New York : Routledge, 2018. | Revised edition of Program evaluation, c2011.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315102429.
Pełny tekst źródłaFitzpatrick, Kathleen Ann. Program evaluation. Schaumburg, IL (1699 E. Woodfield Rd., Ste. 406, Schaumburg 60173): National Study of School Evaluation, 1998.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaGeorgia. Dept. of Audits and Accounts. Performance Audit Operations Division. i Georgia. General Assembly. Budgetary Responsibility Oversight Committee., red. Program evaluation. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Dept. of Audits and Accounts, Performance Audit Operations Division, 2001.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaGeorgia. Dept. of Audits and Accounts. Performance Audit Operations Division. i Georgia. General Assembly. Budgetary Responsibility Oversight Committee., red. Program evaluation. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Dept. of Audits and Accounts, Performance Audit Operations Division, 2001.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaFarmer, Yvette. Comprehensive program evaluation project: Program evaluation preliminary report. Olympia, Wash: Research and Data Analysis, Dept. of Social and Health Services, 2000.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaMinnesota. Legislature. Office of the Legislative Auditor. Program Evaluation Division., red. Ethanol programs: A program evaluation report. St. Paul, MN: Program Evaluation Division, Office of the Legislative Auditor, State of Minnesota, 1997.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaOffice, General Accounting. Program evaluation issues. Washington, D.C: U.S. General Accounting Office, 1988.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaOffice, General Accounting. Program evaluation issues. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1988.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaNational Endowment for the Arts. Office for Special Constituencies, red. Program evaluation workbook. Washington, DC: Office for Special Constituencies, National Endowment for the Arts, 1986.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaCzęści książek na temat "Program evaluation"
Reps, Thomas, i Todd Turnidge. "Program specialization via program slicing". W Partial Evaluation, 409–29. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61580-6_20.
Pełny tekst źródłaLinfield, Kenneth J., i Emil J. Posavac. "Program Evaluation". W Program Evaluation, 1–24. 9th edition. | New York : Routledge, 2018. | Revised edition of Program evaluation, c2011.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315102429-1.
Pełny tekst źródłaFink, Arlene. "Evaluation Reports". W Program Evaluation, 182–201. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032635071-9.
Pełny tekst źródłaFink, Arlene. "Evaluation Measures". W Program Evaluation, 129–43. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781032635071-6.
Pełny tekst źródłaLinfield, Kenneth J., i Emil J. Posavac. "Evaluation Reports". W Program Evaluation, 258–75. 9th edition. | New York : Routledge, 2018. | Revised edition of Program evaluation, c2011.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315102429-13.
Pełny tekst źródłaSchalock, Robert L., i Craig V. D. Thornton. "Decision Making and Evaluation in Program Administration". W Program Evaluation, 3–22. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3508-3_1.
Pełny tekst źródłaSchalock, Robert L., i Craig V. D. Thornton. "Back-of-the-Envelope Benefit-Cost Analysis". W Program Evaluation, 225–31. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3508-3_10.
Pełny tekst źródłaSchalock, Robert L., i Craig V. D. Thornton. "How to Communicate Your Findings". W Program Evaluation, 235–48. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3508-3_11.
Pełny tekst źródłaSchalock, Robert L., i Craig V. D. Thornton. "How Am I Doing?" W Program Evaluation, 249–54. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3508-3_12.
Pełny tekst źródłaSchalock, Robert L., i Craig V. D. Thornton. "Describing Your Program". W Program Evaluation, 23–37. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3508-3_2.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenia konferencji na temat "Program evaluation"
Bargat, Aurore. "Language Program Evaluation". W The IAFOR International Conference on Arts & Humanities – Hawaii 2023. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2432-4604.2023.27.
Pełny tekst źródłaFish, Philip E. "NDT applications in a successful fracture critical bridge inspection program and anchor bolt inspection program". W Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Infrastructure, redaktor Steven B. Chase. SPIE, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.209760.
Pełny tekst źródła"Artifact Evaluation Program Committee". W 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icse-companion52605.2021.00016.
Pełny tekst źródłaMuhaji, Uun, Lasim Muzammil i Andy. "English Education Program Evaluation". W 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.117.
Pełny tekst źródła"Artifact Evaluation Program Committee". W 2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icse-companion55297.2022.9793762.
Pełny tekst źródła"Technical Program Committee". W 2008 Fifth International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems. IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/qest.2008.7.
Pełny tekst źródłaKhoo, Siau Cheng. "Session details: Program transformation I". W PEPM '09: Partial Evaluation and Program Manipulation. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3256916.
Pełny tekst źródłaVoigtlander, Janis. "Session details: Program transformation II". W PEPM '09: Partial Evaluation and Program Manipulation. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3256919.
Pełny tekst źródła"Technical Program Committee". W 2011 Eighth International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/qest.2011.8.
Pełny tekst źródła"Technical Program Committee". W 2012 Ninth International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/qest.2012.7.
Pełny tekst źródłaRaporty organizacyjne na temat "Program evaluation"
Soldano, Miguel, María Aulet, Alayna Tetreault, Pablo Alonso, Jose Claudio Linhares Pires, Christopher Willoughby, Saleema Vellani i Oliver Azuara Herrera. Approach Paper: Country Program Evaluation: Honduras (2011-2014). Inter-American Development Bank, maj 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0010582.
Pełny tekst źródłaHernández, María José, Mauricio Torres, Johanan Rivera, Maya Jansson, Jose Ignacio Sembler, Monika Huppi, Jose Claudio Linhares Pires, Maria Fernanda Rodrigo i Oliver Azuara Herrera. Country Program Evaluation: Guatemala 2012-2016. Inter-American Development Bank, listopad 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0010671.
Pełny tekst źródłaSzwedzki, Roni, Odette Maciel, Dana Michael King, Carolina Romero, Elizabeth Salazar, Priscila Vera, Maria Clemencia Monroy, Diego Del Pilar, Ingrid Garay i Alejandro Soriano. Extended Country Program Evaluation Costa Rica 2015-2022. Inter-American Development Bank, marzec 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0005672.
Pełny tekst źródłaSzwedzki, Roni, Viviana Vélez-Grajales i Irani Arráiz. Country Program Evaluation: Guatemala: (2008-2011). Inter-American Development Bank, styczeń 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0010442.
Pełny tekst źródłaMarto, Ricardo, Miguel Soldano, Paola Buitrago, Agustina Schijman, Peter Freeman, Ali Khadr, Monika Huppi i Andrea Florimon. Approach Paper: Country Program Evaluation: Jamaica (2009-2014). Inter-American Development Bank, maj 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0010580.
Pełny tekst źródłaStone, Leslie F., Michelle Fryer, Pablo Alonso, Jose Claudio Linhares Pires, Lynn Scholl, Héctor Valdés Conroy, María José Hernández, Adriana Molina, Odette Maciel i María José Vargas. Approach Paper: Country Program Evaluation: Suriname (2011-2015). Inter-American Development Bank, grudzień 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0010629.
Pełny tekst źródłaBouillon, César P., Maria Fernanda Rodrigo, Jonathan Rose, María Eugenia Mújica, Stephany Maqueda Gassos i Nathaniel Russell. Country Program Evaluation: Honduras 2015-2018. Inter-American Development Bank, wrzesień 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004477.
Pełny tekst źródłaRamos Piracoca, Johanna, Maria Elena Corrales, Jose Ignacio Sembler, Odette Maciel, Patricia Sadeghi, Leslie F. Stone, Carlos Morales, Oliver Azuara Herrera, Benjamin Roseth i Alejandro Soriano. Approach Paper: Country Program Evaluation: Colombia (2011-2014). Inter-American Development Bank, lipiec 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0010593.
Pełny tekst źródłaHaarsager, Ulrike, Maria Elena Corrales, Ana Ramirez-Goldin, Ángela González, Héctor Valdés Conroy, Alejandro Palomino, Adriana Molina i in. Country Program Evaluation: Peru 2012-2016. Inter-American Development Bank, listopad 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0010672.
Pełny tekst źródłaSoldano, Miguel, Michelle Fryer, Ana María Linares, Santiago Ramírez Rodríguez, Jose Fajgenbaum, César P. Bouillon, Jose Claudio Linhares Pires, Yariela Zeballos, Alejandro Guerrero i Alejandro Soriano. Approach paper: Country Program Evaluation: Panama (2010-2014). Inter-American Development Bank, czerwiec 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0010590.
Pełny tekst źródła