Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Mishʻan”

This study aims to compare the interpretations of Al-Ibriz and Al-Mishab in relation to the relationship between humans and nature. The formulation of the problem raised by the author is: "How is the relationship between humans and nature in Al-Ibriz and Al-Mishbah and what is the difference between the two?" The analytical method used is muqaran. With the type of literature studied, the author makes Tafsir Al-Ibriz and Tafsir Al-Mishbah the primary sources and literature in the form of books and articles related to themes the secondary sources. The results of this study are, first, that the relationship between humans and nature appears in actions that lead to the destruction of nature, namely QS. Al-A'raf: 56. In Tafsir al-Ibriz, acts of destruction are defined as acts of shirk and immorality. Whereas in Tafsir Al-Misbah, vandalism is an act that exceeds the limit, both in terms of its physical, spiritual, and natural surroundings. Second, in QS. Yasin: 33-35 of Tafsir Al-Ibriz, it is stated that humans are ordered to maximize the role of reason in preserving nature as a form of gratitude to Allah SWT. Whereas in Tafsir Al-Mishbah, humans play a direct role in preserving nature, the essence remains Allah SWT, who determines.

It is so important to read that Allah SWT sent down His revelations to the Prophet Muhammad SAW. the first is the command to read in the letter al-'Alaq verses 1-5. This study aims to: (1) To describe the concept of literacy value of surat al-'Alaq verses 1-5 in Tafsir al-Mishbah. (2) To describe the implementation of the literacy value of Surat al-'Alaq verses 1-5 in Tafsir al-Mishbah at MTs Al Uswah Kec. Bergas, Kab. Semarang in 2021. This type of research includes the type of library research, which is research that studies and explores various written sources related to the theme carried by the author, namely the literacy value of the letter al-'Alaq verses 1–5 and its implementation at the madrasah tsanawiyah school level by making M. Quraish Shihab's Tafsīr al-Mishbah as the main source of reference. While the nature of this research is descriptive analytical in this study the subject is in the form of the Literacy Value of Surat al-'Alaq verses 1–5 in Al-Mishbah Tafsir and Its Implementation at MTs Al Uswah Kec. Bergas, Kab. Semarang will be discussed in a clear, coherent and directed manner. Based on the results of the analysis of the book Tafsir al-Mishba h and research at MTs Al Uswah Kec. Bergas, Kab. Semarang shows that: (1) the book Tafsir al-Mishbah is a book of Tafsir al-Qur'an by Prof. Dr. Quraish Shihab, which the book uses the method of tafsir tahlili (analytic), which is a method of interpreting the Koran which intends to explain the contents of the verses of the Koran from all its aspects and follow the order of the verses and surats that have been arranged in the mushaf the Koran now. In the systematic writing of Tafsir al-Mishbah, Quraish Shihab begins by explaining the meaning of the word of Allah SWT in a language that can be understood by many people, conditioned by the cultural environment and the development of science today. (2) The literacy value in Q.S. al-’Alaq verses 1-5 according to the Tafsir Al-Mishbah consist of four aspects of value, namely reading, research, writing, and teaching values. (3) Regarding the implementation of literacy values in order to increase reading interest among students, the head of MTs Al-Uswah Kec. Bergas, Semarang District implements a policy on the morning literacy movement program.Keywords: Tafsir Al-Misbah, Literacy Value, Implementation Tafsir Al-Misbah

The introduction of non-halakhic material into a halakhic section of a classical rabbinic work is a redactional choice that can substantially affect the interpretation of both kinds of material. Understanding the relationship between the non-halakhic material and the surrounding halakhic material can affect one's assessment of the redactor's activity. Conversely, assumptions concerning the redactor's activity can affect the interpretation of the non-halakhic material.The relationship between halakhic and non-halakhic material and the implications of that relationship for redaction critical investigations are particularly complex in the case of the Tosefta, because the latter is not a completely independent composition. Some scholars see the Tosefta as an interpretative work based on the Mishna while others argue for a degree of redactional independence. What then is the proper context for the interpretation of materials found in the Tosefta—the Tosefta itself or the Mishnah? The answer to this question will crucially affect our interpretation of the non-halakhic material included in the Tosefta and the relation of that material to the halakhic material. This article demonstrates the difficulty in determining the proper redactional context for the interpretation of Toseftan passages that contain halakhic and non-halakhic material by examining the story of Rabbi Yehuda walking behind his teachers in T. Berakhot 1.2. The reason for inserting the story can be understood in three ways, corresponding to three different definitions of the “halakhic context,” in which the Mishnah has a greater or lesser controlling influence over the Tosefta.

This study included an assessment of the hydrogeological conditions of the Mishraq sulphur fields before production, by measuring groundwater levels in (11) wells in Mishraq-2 in 2021, as well as the information of wells obtained, which are (12) wells in Mishraq-3, (68) wells in Mishraq-1. Groundwater levels ranged between (187.71-205.80) m in Mishraq-1, while in Mishraq-2 it ranged between (189.19-196.26) m, as for Mishraq-3 the levels were between (186.4-194.98) m.
 The contour maps were drawn for the movement and levels of groundwater, showing that the direction of groundwater movement in Mishraq field-1 is from the west and northwest to the east, with a slight slope towards the southeast, towards the Tigris River, while in the Mishraq field-2, we notice that the direction of groundwater movement is From the east to the west, that is, toward the Tigris River, as for Mishraq field-3, it was found that the direction of movement is from the southeast toward the northwest, that is, toward the Tigris and Great Zab rivers. So it can be said that the Tigris and Great Zab rivers are the two drainage areas in these three fields. The hydraulic properties were analyzed in (44) wells in the three Al-Mishraq fields. Where the values ​​of Transmissivity (T) in Mishraq field-1 ranged between (24.4-1557.5) m2/day, as for Mishraq-2 it ranged between (23-96.91) m2/day, while in Mishraq-3 it ranged between (10.5-4002) ) m2//day, and the hydraulic conductivity (K) ranged between (0.26 -14.68) m/day in Mishraq field-1, as for Mishraq-2 it ranged between (0.7-4.2) m/day, while in Mishraq-3 It ranged between (0.37-119.09) m/day.