Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Knowledge economy”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Spis treści
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Knowledge economy”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Knowledge economy"
Jeníček, V. "Globalisation and knowledge economy". Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 52, No. 1 (16.02.2012): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/4990-agricecon.
Pełny tekst źródłaRichard B. Freeman. "Knowledge, Knowledge… Knowledge for My Economy". KDI Journal of Economic Policy 37, nr 2 (maj 2015): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2015.37.2.1.
Pełny tekst źródłaArystanbekova, A. "Knowledge-Based Economy". World Economy and International Relations, nr 6 (2008): 30–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2008-6-30-33.
Pełny tekst źródłaDué, Richard T. "THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY". Information Systems Management 12, nr 3 (styczeń 1995): 76–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07399019508962991.
Pełny tekst źródłaLuque, Emilio. "Whose knowledge (economy)?" Social Epistemology 15, nr 3 (lipiec 2001): 187–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02691720110076521.
Pełny tekst źródłaClarke, Thomas. "The knowledge economy". Education + Training 43, nr 4/5 (czerwiec 2001): 189–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400910110399184.
Pełny tekst źródłaDebnath, Sajit Chandra. "Knowledge Economy Approach". International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review 8, nr 4 (2010): 215–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/cgp/v08i04/42841.
Pełny tekst źródłaPowell, Walter W., i Kaisa Snellman. "The Knowledge Economy". Annual Review of Sociology 30, nr 1 (sierpień 2004): 199–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037.
Pełny tekst źródłaVeselá, Dagmar, i Katarína Klimová. "Knowledge-based Economy vs. Creative Economy". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141 (sierpień 2014): 413–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.072.
Pełny tekst źródłaDesouza, Kevin C. "Advancing knowledge and the knowledge economy". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, nr 2 (2007): 331–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20741.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Knowledge economy"
Гладченко, Оксана Робертівна, Оксана Робертовна Гладченко, Oksana Robertivna Hladchenko, Юлія Миколаївна Линник, Юлия Николаевна Линник i Yuliia Mykolaivna Lynnyk. "The knowledge economy". Thesis, Видавництво СумДУ, 2010. http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/17506.
Pełny tekst źródłaSalam, Umar A. "'Knowledge as development' : a critique of the knowledge economy". Thesis, University of Oxford, 2015. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:11b5f7f3-18e0-4d3b-9b4c-b03bf2cf251d.
Pełny tekst źródłaCerfonteyn, Henk. "The anatomy of the knowledge economy". Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/51938.
Pełny tekst źródłaENGLISH ABSTRACT: A major trend from an information era towards a knowledge economy is currently being experienced, which can be ascribed to the growing importance of knowledge in various countries. The anatomy of the knowledge economy concerns an overall view from the perspective of the organisation. The knowledge economy is analysed in terms of what it involves, its effects on the workplace, the role of information and communication technology (lCT), and emergent key ethical issues. Production and exploitation of knowledge will become the main source of wealth in the knowledge economy. Knowledge can be regarded as value-added to data and information that can be located in organisations either explicitly or tacitly. Tacit knowledge is most prevalent and underutilised form in organisations, and can be exploited to its full extent in the form of intellectual property. A printing metaphor is used to illustrate the extent to which knowledge can become embedded in products, thus increasing intangibility levels within products. Knowledge, as a strategic asset for any organisation, can be generated by innovation and dissemination processes. Knowledge also results in more customised high-valued goods, for which clients are willing to pay more. In facilitating a favourable environment for knowledge development in organisations, governments have an essential role to play. This role includes establishing cultures of entrepreneurship, innovativeness and competitiveness through education, training and funding of appropriate organisations. In order to reap substantial benefits from the knowledge economy, various countries are transforming their economies accordingly. The United States of America, Sweden, Finland and Singapore are currently leading in this respect while others like Canada and the United Kingdom have committed themselves to the new economic order. The measurement of knowledge within organisations has not yet been resolved due to difficulties in isolating the value of knowledge at various levels within the organisation. The escalation and importance of information and knowledge in work processes have resulted in the emergence of knowledge workers at the expense of workers involved with the physical dimension of work. By defeating spatial and temporal limitations through virtualisation, ICT will offer organisations and their workers the necessary agility for survival in the knowledge economy. In response, management will have to change organisational structures and increase innovativeness. Technology, as in the past, will increase capabilities of people even more, for example in the form of supporting tools, automation, controlling devices and connectivity. ICT, being the core technology in the knowledge economy, will have a major role to play relating to knowledge development within organisations by means of the knowledge value chain. The Internet will become an important technology in the knowledge economy. Concerns about unethical and criminal practices in knowledge economies centre around the violation of rights in terms of privacy and freedom, protection of property rights, accountability and liability, reliability of systems and quality of life. To sustain a prosperous knowledge economy and just society will involve innovative stakeholders who participate actively in achieving and maintaining goals of common interest.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Tans vind 'n belangrike neiging vanaf 'n inligtingsera na 'n kennisekonomie plaas, wat toegeskryf kan word aan die toenemende belangrikheid van kennis in verskeie lande. Die anatomie van 'n kennisekonomie behels 'n oorsig vanaf die perspektief van die organisasie. Die kennisekonomie word beskou in terme van wat dit impliseer, die effek op die werksplek, die rol van inligtings- en kommunikasietegnologie (lKT), en opkomende etiese aangeleenthede. Die produksie en benutting van kennis gaan die belangrikste bron van welvaart word in die kennisekonomie. Die verskynsel van kennis kan beskou word as waarde toevoeging tot data en inligting en is sigbaar in organisasies in die vorm van óf eksplisiete óf verskuilde kennis. Verskuilde kennis is die mees algemene, maar onbenutte vorm in organisasies kan tot sy volle potensiaal ontgin word as intellektuele eiendom. Die drukkuns word as metafoor gebruik om aan te dui tot watter mate kennis deel geword het van produkte, wat lei tot verhoging van die nie-tasbare komponent in produkte. Kennis, as 'n strategiese bate vir enige organisasie, word geskep deur middel van innovering en verspreiding. Kennis bied ook hoë-waarde aan goedere tot so 'n mate dat kliënte bereid is om daarvoor meer te betaal. Om 'n gunstige omgewing vir kennis ontwikkeling te verkry, het regerings 'n belangrike funksie met betrekking tot die daarstelling van kulture wat betref entrepreneurskap, innovering en mededingendheid deur middel van opvoeding, opleiding en befondsing van toepaslike organisasies. Verskeie land is besig om hul ekonomieë te omvorm om die beduidende voordele wat die kennisekonomie bied, te benut. Die Verenigde State van Amerika, Swede, Finland en Singapoer is tans leiers in dié verband, terwyl Kanada en die Verenigde Koninkryk hulself ook tot die nuwe ekonomie verbind het. Om kennis binne organisasies in finansiële terme te meet is nog nie uitgepluis nie, vanweë die probleme om waarde van kennis by verskeie vlakke binne die organisasie te isoleer. Die toename en belangrikheid van inligting en kennis in die werksplek het gelei tot die verskynsel van kenniswerkers, ten koste van diegene betrokke met die fisiese sy van werk. Deurdat die beperkinge van ruimte en tyd deur middel van virtualisasie opgehef is, maak IKT organisasies en sy werkers meer rats en lenig - eienskappe wat vir oorlewing in die kennisekonomie vereis word. In reaksie hierop, sal bestuur hul organisasie strukture moet aanpas en innoveringsvermoë moet opknap. Tegnologie, soos altyd, sal vermoëns van mense verder verhoog, byvoorbeeld in die vorm van ondersteunende hulpmiddele, outomatisering, beheermiddele en skakeling. IKT, as kerntegnologie in die kennisekonomie, gaan 'n sentrale posisie inneem in die ontwikkeling van kennis in organsasies met behulp van die kennis waardeketting. Die Internet gaan 'n sleutel tegnologie in die kennisekonomie word. Kommer oor onetiese en kriminele praktyke in die kennisekonomie hou verband met die oorskryding van regte in terme van privaatheid en vryheid, beskerming van eiendomsreg, aanspreeklikheid en verantwoordelikheid, betroubaarheid van IKT stelsels en lewensgehalte. Om 'n voorspoedige kennisekonomie terselfdertyd met 'n regverdige gemeenskap te handhaaf, beteken dat innoverende rolspelers aktief sal moet deelneem om gemeenskaplike doelwitte na te streef en te verseker.
Aberkane, Idriss Jamil. "Mind Ergonomy for the Knowledge Economy : software Neuroergonomics and Biomimetics for the Knowledge Economy. Why? How? What?" Thesis, Université Paris-Saclay (ComUE), 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016SACLX005.
Pełny tekst źródłaCould we flow knowledge faster and better? Why is this a problem in the first place? How can we tackle it technologically? What could be a prototype solution? This work unifies these questions in the outline of a single, refutable paradigm of noodynamics - the study of knowledge flows - and nooconomics, the economy of knowledge. This paradigm will answer the question “Why”. Neuroergonomics (“brain ergonomics”), and biomimicry, will be summoned in answer to the question “How”. Their contribution will follow from the simplest knowledge flow equation that is proposed in this work. Two original optimisation problems are also posed in software neuroergonomics and biomimetics: the Mindscape and Serendipity Problem. A case of theoretical neuroergonomics, or neuroergonomics ex ante is proposed with the study of Hyperwriting, a written grapheme-loceme association, or a glyphic method for externalising spatial memory. Its application to the design of user interface will finally found neuroergonomic design, or neuromimicry, with the example of a collegial interface to augment multiscale knowledge flows: Chréage. The anatomy of this prototype mindscape will be the conclusion of this work, and its answer to the question “What”?
Macy, Robert Scott. "Knowledge competency acquisition in the knowledge economy : links to firm performance /". view abstract or download file of text, 2006. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1196407371&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=11238&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Pełny tekst źródłaTypescript. Includes vita and abstract. Study based on data derived from a sampling of 189 large U.S. law firms. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 90-101). Also available for download via the World Wide Web; free to University of Oregon users.
Rawlings, Anna Kirsten. "Trade secrecy in a knowledge-based economy". Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2001. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp05/MQ63089.pdf.
Pełny tekst źródłaStapleton, Jaime. "Art, intellectual property and the knowledge economy". Thesis, Goldsmiths College (University of London), 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.408015.
Pełny tekst źródłaColucci, Alex R. "Knowledge Production, Capital Punishment, and Political Economy". Kent State University / OhioLINK, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1555694255644039.
Pełny tekst źródłaLiu, Fang-Chun. "Value Creation in the Knowledge-Based Economy". Diss., Temple University Libraries, 2013. http://cdm16002.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/216553.
Pełny tekst źródłaPh.D.
Effective investment strategies help companies form dynamic core organizational capabilities allowing them to adapt and survive in today's rapidly changing knowledge-based economy. This dissertation investigates three valuation issues that challenge managers with respect to developing business-critical investment strategies that can have significant impacts on firm performance and growth in the competitive, information-orientated business environment. Using firm-level data collected from Taiwan, this dissertation examines specific valuation issues that are vital in shaping not only firm performance but also competitive advantages in current knowledge-based economy: (1) investments in information technology (IT), (2) human capital, and (3) corporate governance. To address these three major managerial challenges relating to firm investment strategies, this dissertation focuses on investigating the impact of three sources of business value creation, including IT investment, workforce education, and Chief Audit Executive (CAE) turnover. The results of investigating service infrastructure in the banking industry support the idea that in today's complex, fast moving multichannel business environment, evaluation of the strategic value of IT must consider both the direct impact of individual channels and the complementary relationships between IT-based channels and the traditional branch channel while constructing an effective business strategy to align IT use with firm strategic objectives. The interdependence between channels found in this study has a significant effect on firms' short term profitability and long term market competition capability, suggesting that the true value of IT will be fully realized only when coupled with complementary investments in organizational resources. Second, results of examining investments in workforce and research and development (R&D) activities in IT industries indicate that firms with more highly educated workforces have, on average, better performance. Investment in R&D for improving innovation capability is positively associated with firm performance. More importantly, higher levels of workforce education moderate the impact of R&D investment on firm performance, confirming the hypothesized interdependency between workforce education and firm innovation capabilities. In other words, firms benefit more from investment in R&D activities when they have a higher level of educated workforce. An important strategic implication from the DuPont Analysis is that the complementarity between workforce education and R&D capital reinforces a firm's differentiation strategy. Finally, the results of analyzing CAE turnover in Taiwan public companies show that CAE turnover is positively correlated with executive turnover (Chief Executive Officer [CEO] and Chief Financial Officer [CFO]) and financial restatements, which are commonly viewed as a signal of a troubled business or failure. The study also shows that CAE turnover has a negative impact on contemporaneous and future firm performance, suggesting that, to some extent, changing the head of the internal audit function conveys a negative signal to the market regarding a firm's performance. Given that the CAE monitors and assesses enterprise risk practices, the findings of this study suggest that CAE turnover could be used as an indicator of business volatility and potential business risk. The passage of the governance law which improves the quality of a firm's internal control system is found to reinforce the signaling role of CAE turnover and improve firm performance. The results of this dissertation provide important strategic insights regarding the factors managers should consider when making investment choices that are expected to align with a firm's long term development and performance. This dissertation complements literature in managerial accounting and information systems, particularly contributing to business value of IT investment, human capital, and internal audit research streams. It also addresses regulatory implications for policy makers such as regulating relevant disclosures of company information for interested parties and developing a regulatory environment that minimizes regulatory barriers which can suppress businesses and economy growth.
Temple University--Theses
Nel, Timothy John. "Towards an operational definition of the knowledge economy". Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/6703.
Pełny tekst źródłaENGLISH ABSTRACT: This thesis seeks to contribute towards a much-‐needed operational definition of the knowledge economy – a term which is as widely used as it is misunderstood. Despite two decades of academic contemplation and debate, much uncertainty still surrounds the concept of a knowledge economy, making it exceedingly difficult for researches, academics and policymakers to find a shared perspective. The problem extends beyond just semantics – often contained within a certain definition are underlying assumptions that have the potential to inform decision-‐making and guide action. Chapter One introduces the aims of this thesis, and outlines the intended approach. In particular, it highlights the challenges of conducting a literature review based on an extensive and highly varied set of contributions towards the concept of the knowledge economy. Chapter Two seeks to clarify the concept of the knowledge economy and how it distinguishes itself from the broader, more inclusive concept of the knowledge society. After drawing distinctions between the two concepts, Chapter Two develops upon the knowledge society concept’s more inclusive nature, and suggests that the extensive scope of the term detracts from its usefulness as a guide for policymakers – in particular, in relation to the somewhat more precise concept of the knowledge economy. Chapter Three begins the focus on the In order to provide some conceptual clarity in this regard, a number of the most prevalent and/or enduring contributions are grouped under the four overarching categorisations that emerged as a result of the discussion in this chapter: namely, Propositional Knowledge, Prescriptive Knowledge, Cultural Knowledge and Understanding. Chapter Four focuses on the next component of the term knowledge economy, and places attention on the economic aspects of knowledge which have emerged over the past two decades as a result of the technological and academic shifts that have taken place in this period. Chapter Five uses the foundation of understanding built up to this point to answer the question: what is new about the knowledge economy? Here, the impact of ICTs comes to the fore in illustrating the way in which these technologies have altered modern societies on a deep and profound level. Secondly, Chapter Five develops upon the way in which knowledge as an economy commodity has caused widespread upheaval in Industrial Era economic theory. Here, the idea that the tenets that governed the physical paradigm economy of industry and manufacturing are no longer relevant or valuable in the face of a core commodity which does not obey the principal rules of physical paradigm goods. Chapter Six concludes the discussions that have unfolded in this thesis, and highlights how the preceding chapters all contribute towards achieving the initial aims of the thesis. On top of this, it highlights the challenges uncovered during the course of the thesis that will continue to provide limitations to the achievement of a precise definition of the concept of the knowledge economy. It is concluded that the discussions developed in this thesis would achieve their goal in providing a valuable and comprehensive ‘working definition’ of the knowledge economy for academics and policymakers seeking to find conceptual clarity and a platform of ‘common ground’ from which to base their conversations and debates.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die oogmerk van hierdie tesis is om by te dra tot die gangbare definisie van die kennis ekonomie – ’n term wat net so wyd gebruik word as wat dit misverstaan word. Ten spyte van twee dekades van akademiese nadenke en debatvoering, is daar steeds onduidelikheid rondom die kennis ekonomie as konsep, wat dit vir navorsers, akademici en beleidmakers moeilik maak om ’n algemeen-‐aanvaarde perspektief te bereik. Die probleem is nie bloot semanties van aard nie – sommige definisies behels onderliggende aannames wat die potensiaal het om besluitneming and handeling te beïnvloed. Hoofstuk Een dien as inleiding tot die doelstellings van hierdie tesis en omskryf die benadering van die tesis. Dit beklemtoon spesifiek die uitdagings rondom die skryf van ’n literatuuroorsig wat gebaseer is op ‘n uitgebreide en hoogs-‐gevarieerde stel bydrae tot die konsep van die kennis ekonomie. Hoofstuk Twee se doel is om lig te werp op die konsep van die kennis ekonomie en hoe dit onderskei kan word van die breër, meer omvattende term van die kennis samelewing. Nadat onderskeid getref is tussen die twee konsepte, ontwikkel Hoofstuk Twee die kennis samelewing se meer insluitende aard, en stel voor dat die uitgebreide omvang van die term afbreuk doen aan die nut wat die term as ’n riglyn vir beleidmakers het – spesifiek in verhouding tot die meer presiese konsep van die kennis ekonomie. Hoofstuk Drie begin die fokus op die ekonomiese komponent van die term ‘kennis ekonomie’. Ten einde konseptuele duidelikheid te skep, word die mees algemene en/of blywende bydrae gegroepeer onder vier kategorieë, wat blyk uit die bespreking in hierdie hoofstuk, naamlik: Proposisionele Kennis, Voorskriftelike Kennis, Kulturele Kennis en Begrip. Hoofstuk Vier fokus op die volgende komponent van die term kennis ekonomie en rig die aandag op die ekonomiese aspekte van kennis, wat oor die laaste twee dekades na vore gekom het as gevolg van tegnologiese en akademiese klemverskuiwings wat gedurende hierdie tydperk plaasgevind het. Hoofstuk Vyf gebruik die grondslag van begrip wat tot dusver geskep is, om die vraag te beantwoord: wat is nuut omtrent die kennis ekonomie? Hier word die impak van ICTs duidelik deurdat dit illustreer hoe hierdie tegnologieë moderne samelewings op ‘n fundamentele en diepgaande vlak verander het. Tweedens, ontwikkel Hoofstuk Vyf verder die manier waarop kennis as ekonomiese kommoditeit wydverspreide omwenteling in Industriële Era ekonomiese teorie. Hieruit word dit duidelik dat die beginsels wat die fisiese paradigma ekonomie onderskryf nie meer geldig is met ’n kern kommoditeit wat nie die beginsels van fisiese paradigma goedere gehoorsaam nie. Hoofstuk Ses sluit die besprekings wat in die loop van die tesis ontwikkel het af, en beklemtoon hoe die voorafgaande hoofstukke almal bydra tot die doelstellings wat aanvanklik in die tesis voorgestel is. Verder, beklemtoon dit die uitdagings wat uitgelig is in die tesis wat steeds beperkings stel ten opsigte van die bepaling van ’n presiese definisie van die kennis ekonomie. Die gevolgtrekking wat gemaak word is dat die besprekings wat ontwikkel is tydens die tesis hul doel van ’n waardevolle en omvattende operasionele definisie bereik. Dit is van nut vir akedemici en beleidmakers in terme van konseptuele duidelikheid en ’n basis of gemeenskaplike grond vanwaar besprekings en debat kan geskied.
Książki na temat "Knowledge economy"
Sörlin, Sverker, i Hebe Vessuri, red. Knowledge Society vs. Knowledge Economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230603516.
Pełny tekst źródła1959-, Neef Dale, red. The knowledge economy. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródła1963-, Bryson J. R., red. Knowledge, space, economy. London: Routledge, 2000.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaPsarikidou, Katerina. Reclaiming the Knowledge Economy. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6843-2.
Pełny tekst źródłaWalby, Sylvia, Heidi Gottfried, Karin Gottschall i Mari Osawa. Gendering the Knowledge Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230624870.
Pełny tekst źródłaTordoir, Pieter P. The Professional Knowledge Economy. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8437-1.
Pełny tekst źródłaMeusburger, Peter, Johannes Glückler i Martina el Meskioui, red. Knowledge and the Economy. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6131-5.
Pełny tekst źródła1957-, Hearn Greg, i Ninan Abraham 1965-, red. The knowledge economy handbook. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2005.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development., red. The knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD, 1996.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaLtd, TFPL, red. Skills for knowledge management: Building a knowledge economy. London: TFPL, 1999.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaCzęści książek na temat "Knowledge economy"
Burger, Doris. "Knowledge Economy". W Computergestützter organisationaler Wissenstransfer und Wissensgenerierung, 33–58. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93047-3_4.
Pełny tekst źródłaKabir, Mitt Nowshade. "Knowledge Economy". W Knowledge-Based Social Entrepreneurship, 35–57. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-34809-8_2.
Pełny tekst źródłaMongkhonvanit, Jomphong. "Knowledge Economy". W Coopetition for Regional Competitiveness, 3–12. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-149-7_1.
Pełny tekst źródłaJordan, Eamonn. "Knowledge Economy". W Irish Theatre, 120–43. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003180074-6.
Pełny tekst źródłaRomer, Paul M., i Joel Kurtzman. "The Knowledge Economy". W Handbook on Knowledge Management 1, 73–87. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3_5.
Pełny tekst źródłaKennedy, Peter. "The Knowledge Economy". W The Knowledge Economy and Lifelong Learning, 163–83. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-915-2_8.
Pełny tekst źródłaKennedy, Peter. "The Knowledge Economy". W The Knowledge Economy and Lifelong Learning, 163–83. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-916-2_8.
Pełny tekst źródłade Rambures, Dominique. "The Knowledge Economy". W The China Development Model, 103–15. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137465498_7.
Pełny tekst źródłaMarti, José Maria Viedma, i Maria do Rosário Cabrita. "The Knowledge Economy". W Entrepreneurial Excellence in the Knowledge Economy, 10–39. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137024077_2.
Pełny tekst źródłaStehr, Nico, i Alexander Ruser. "Knowledge Society, Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Democracy". W Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense, 1–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_16-1.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenia konferencji na temat "Knowledge economy"
Sakız, Burcu. "Knowledge Economy and Turkey". W International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c05.01169.
Pełny tekst źródłaCeric, V. "Building the knowledge economy". W Proceedings 23rd International Conference Information Technology Interfaces. ITI 2001. IEEE, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iti.2001.938013.
Pełny tekst źródła"KNOWLEDGE INTENSITY OF ORGANIZATIONS IN KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY". W 3rd International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies. SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0001266002100213.
Pełny tekst źródłaRudakova, Olga. "Economy of Knowledge and Economic Growth in Russia". W 2017 International Conference on Culture, Education and Financial Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iccese-17.2017.151.
Pełny tekst źródłaWang, Na, i Jinguo Wang. "Knowledge Economy and Medical Education". W 3rd International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/emle-17.2017.140.
Pełny tekst źródła"The Local Economy - Property in the Knowledge Based Economy". W 10th European Real Estate Society Conference: ERES Conference 2003. ERES, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.15396/eres2003_271.
Pełny tekst źródłaAshraf, Abrar. "Socially Inclusive Knowledge Economy For Sustainable Development". W 27th International Scientific Conference “Competitiveness and Innovation in the Knowledge Economy”. Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.53486/cike2023.31.
Pełny tekst źródłaTumenova, Svetlana. "Knowledge Economy: Noospheric Context Of Development". W SCTCMG 2019 - Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism. Cognitive-Crcs, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.434.
Pełny tekst źródłaMercier-Laurent, Eunika. "Managing Intellectual Capital in Knowledge Economy". W 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. PTI, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2014f476.
Pełny tekst źródłaTańska, Halina, i Jolanta Sala. "Competences in the knowledge-based economy". W 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. PTI, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2016f180.
Pełny tekst źródłaRaporty organizacyjne na temat "Knowledge economy"
Davis, Donald, i Jonathan Dingel. A Spatial Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, czerwiec 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w18188.
Pełny tekst źródłaAntràs, Pol, Luis Garicano i Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Offshoring in a Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, styczeń 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w11094.
Pełny tekst źródłavon Sigsfeld, Julia. Ancestral Knowledges and the Ecuadorian Knowledge Society. Maria Sibylla Merian International Centre for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences Conviviality-Inequality in Latin America, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46877/sigsfeld.2020.24.
Pełny tekst źródłaYoung, Ron, red. Knowledge Management and Innovation: Thriving in the Global Knowledge Economy. Asian Productivity Organization, listopad 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.61145/crev7373.
Pełny tekst źródłaGaricano, Luis, i Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Organization and Inequality in a Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, lipiec 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w11458.
Pełny tekst źródłaKeller, Wolfgang, i Stephen Yeaple. Global Production and Trade in the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, grudzień 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w14626.
Pełny tekst źródłaZayakina, Irina Aleksandrovna. Intellectual property management as knowledge economy key problem. DOI CODE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/doicode-2023.195.
Pełny tekst źródłaAbraham, Katharine, John Haltiwanger, Kristin Sandusky i James Spletzer. Measuring the Gig Economy: Current Knowledge and Open Issues. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, sierpień 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w24950.
Pełny tekst źródłaGaricano, Luis, i Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. Knowledge-based Hierarchies: Using Organizations to Understand the Economy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, październik 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w20607.
Pełny tekst źródłaHall, Bronwyn, i Jacques Mairesse. Empirical Studies of Innovation in the Knowledge Driven Economy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, czerwiec 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w12320.
Pełny tekst źródła