Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Israeli Public opinion”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Israeli Public opinion”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Israeli Public opinion"
Peretz, Don. "Israeli Public Opinion". Journal of Palestine Studies 26, nr 3 (1997): 98–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2538164.
Pełny tekst źródłaMusleh, Rami Saleh Abdelrazeq, Mahmoud Ismail i Dala Mahmoud. "Palestinian State through the Official and Unofficial Israeli Perspective". Asian Social Science 14, nr 3 (26.02.2018): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n3p55.
Pełny tekst źródłaArian, Asher, Eytan Gilboa, Elia Zureik i Fouad Moughrabi. "American Public Opinion toward Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict". Political Psychology 9, nr 4 (grudzień 1988): 701. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3791536.
Pełny tekst źródłaDoob, Leonard W., i Eytan Gilboa. "American Public Opinion toward Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict." Political Science Quarterly 102, nr 3 (1987): 526. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2151423.
Pełny tekst źródłaRidge, Hannah M. "Jewish Nationalism in Israel: A Measurement". Religions 15, nr 7 (17.07.2024): 864. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel15070864.
Pełny tekst źródłaLeep, Matthew, i Jeremy Pressman. "Foreign cues and public views on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict". British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21, nr 1 (21.11.2018): 169–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1369148118809807.
Pełny tekst źródłaPeretz, Don. "Israeli Public Opinion: Security Threatened: Surveying Israel Opinion on Peace and War. . Asher Arian." Journal of Palestine Studies 26, nr 3 (kwiecień 1997): 98–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jps.1997.26.3.00p0142d.
Pełny tekst źródłaShany, Yuval. "Capacities and Inadequacies: A Look at the Two Separation Barrier Cases". Israel Law Review 38, nr 1-2 (2005): 230–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021223700012681.
Pełny tekst źródłaLustick, Ian S. "Making Sense of the Nakba". Journal of Palestine Studies 44, nr 2 (2015): 7–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jps.2015.44.2.7.
Pełny tekst źródłaGinat, Rami, i Marwan Abu-Ghazaleh Mahajneh. "Rethinking the Egyptian–Israeli Peace Treaty: Perceptions and Receptions Within Egyptian Society (1977–1982)". Contemporary Review of the Middle East 9, nr 1 (10.11.2021): 9–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23477989211053524.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Israeli Public opinion"
Zeumer, Mathias. "Israeli Rejection of the Arab Peace Initiative: Political Climate and Public Perceptions". Thesis, University of Oregon, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/18737.
Pełny tekst źródłaOdeh, Rana Kamal. "The Impact of Changing Narratives on American Public Opinion Toward the U.S.-Israel Relationship". Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2014. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1401818860.
Pełny tekst źródłaSpäti, Christina. "Die schweizerische Linke und Israel : Israelbegeisterung, Antizionismus und Antisemitismus zwischen 1967 und 1991 /". Essen : Klartext, 2006. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/68628499.html.
Pełny tekst źródłaShchomak, Omelyan. "Jerusalém e jogos de dois níveis:posições de Israel e Palestina no período 2005-2019 e influência das pressões internas e externas sobre os decisores". Master's thesis, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/19162.
Pełny tekst źródłaO Estatuto de Jerusalém é um dos principais problemas que não foi resolvido ao longo da história do conflito entre Israel e a Palestina. O objetivo desta tese é analisar as mudanças nas posições dos negociadores israelitas e palestinianos e dos constituintes domésticos de ambas as partes em relação ao estatuto de Jerusalém. Foi usada a abordagem teórica de jogos de dois níveis, cujo argumento basilar é de que o negociador procura obter um acordo que seja atrativo para os seus constituintes domésticos. No caso de Israel foi escolhida a opinião pública e o Knesset e no caso da Palestina a opinião pública e o partido Fatah como constituintes internos. Foram analisados os win-sets de cada lado e a forma como estes moldaram as negociações. Foram consideradas as pressões externas dos EUA e da Liga Árabe nos negociadores e seus constituintes. Foi feita a pesquisa documental extensiva da literatura, artigos de jornais de notícias, discursos políticos, relatórios das negociações e estudos da opinião pública. Foi encontrado que durante o processo de paz de Annapolis ambas as partes tiveram maiores hipóteses de se comprometerem em relação a Jerusalém Oriental. A coligação governamental israelita apontava mais para o centro do espectro político, e o público de ambos os lados estava mais disposto a assumir compromissos sobre Jerusalém Oriental. Com a subida de Netanyahu ao poder e a formação das sucessivas coligações governamentais da direita, para Israel não seria possível aceitar compromissos em relação à cidade. O apoio público aos compromissos sobre Jerusalém dos dois lados decresceu ao longo dos anos. O lado palestiniano, apesar de manter a posição constante – estabelecimento da soberania palestiniana sobre os territórios ocupados por Israel desde 1967, acabaria por estar mais disposto a assumir compromissos sobre Jerusalém Oriental.
The status of Jerusalem has been one of the main unresolved issues throughout all the history of Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the shifts of the Israeli and Palestinian negotiators positions and of its domestic constituents on the Jerusalem status. Two-Level Games approach was used to analyze this issue. In this approach negotiator seeks to achieve an agreement that will be attractive to his domestic constituents. Public opinion and Knesset in the case of Israel and public opinion and Fatah party in the case of Palestine were considered as domestic constituents in this thesis. The win-sets of each side and the way they shaped the negotiations were analyzed. External influences, such as international pressures of US and Arab League and their reverberations were also considered. An extensive research of the literature, newspaper articles, public discourses, negotiations reports, official documents, and public opinion polls, was performed. It was found that both parties had the greatest opportunity to compromise over East Jerusalem during Annapolis peace process: the Governmental coalition of Israel was shifted to the centre of the political spectrum and public support of both sides was the highest during this period. With Netanyahu’s rise to the power, successive governmental coalitions shifted more to the right and would not accept any compromise over Jerusalem. Public support for negotiations and compromises over Jerusalem has also dropped on both sides. In case of Palestine, despite maintaining a constant position – establishing Palestinian sovereignty over territories which Israel occupied in 1967, Abbas and Fatah were willing to accept compromises over East Jerusalem.
N/A
Cummins, Joshua I. "Hearts and Minds: US Foreign Policy and Anti-Americanism in the Middle EastAn Analysis of Public Perceptions from 2002-2011". Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1366212110.
Pełny tekst źródłaMnyaka, Mluleki Michael Ntutuzelo. "Xenophobia as a response to foreigners in post-apartheid South Africa and post-exilic Israel: a comparative critique in the light of the gospel and Ubuntu ethical principles". Thesis, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1176.
Pełny tekst źródłaReligious Studies and Arabic
D.Th.(Theological Ethics)
Książki na temat "Israeli Public opinion"
Ben-Meir, Yehuda. Israeli public opinion. [Tel Aviv]: Tel Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, 1995.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaAʼsi, Murad. Israeli and Palestinian public opinion. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Near East Cultural and Educational Foundation of Canada, 1986.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaArian, Alan. Israeli security opinion, February 1996. Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, 1996.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaMerkaz le-meḥḳarim asṭraṭegiyim ʻal shem Yafeh, red. Israeli public opinion on national security, 2000. Tel Aviv: Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, 2000.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaArian, Alan. Israeli public opinion and the war in Lebanon. [Tel Aviv, Israel]: Tel Aviv University, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, 1985.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaBoer, Connie de. West European public opinion and the Palestine question. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Near East Cultural and Educational Foundation of Canada, 1986.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaRejwan, Nissim. Arab aims and Israeli attitudes: A critique of Yehoshafat Harkabi's prognosis of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Jerusalem, Israel: Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2000.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaEshel, Yohanan. Intergroup violence: Perspectives of dominant majority and a subordinate minority. [Haifa]: University of Haifa, 1996.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaKhalīl, Shiqāqī, red. Palestinian and Israeli public opinion: The public imperative in the second intifada. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press, 2010.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaBarzilai, Gad. The use of force: Israeli public opinion on military options. Ramat Gan, Israel: BESA Center, Bar-Ilan University, 1996.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaCzęści książek na temat "Israeli Public opinion"
Cavari, Amnon, i Guy Freedman. "Attitudes about the Arab-Israeli Conflict and US Involvement in the Region". W American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 49–87. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-5.
Pełny tekst źródłaA’si, Murad. "Israeli and Palestinian Public Opinion and the Palestine Question". W Public Opinion and the Palestine Question, 143–201. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003399421-5.
Pełny tekst źródłaScheindlin, Dahlia. "Israeli and Palestinian Public Opinion and the Two-State Solution". W Routledge Companion to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 463–80. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429027376-38.
Pełny tekst źródłaAvnery, Uri. "Changing Public Opinion in Israel". W Peacemakers in Israel-Palestine, 145–57. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003262817-14.
Pełny tekst źródłaCavari, Amnon, i Guy Freedman. "Studying American Attitudes Toward Israel". W American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 15–28. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-3.
Pełny tekst źródłaCavari, Amnon, i Guy Freedman. "Introduction". W American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 1–11. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-1.
Pełny tekst źródłaCavari, Amnon, i Guy Freedman. "The Nature of the Partisan Divide over Palestinian Independence". W American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 183–201. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-10.
Pełny tekst źródłaCavari, Amnon, i Guy Freedman. "Conclusion: A Conditional Relationship?" W American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 202–14. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-11.
Pełny tekst źródłaCavari, Amnon, i Guy Freedman. "Positive Affect in American Attitudes Toward Israel". W American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 29–48. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-4.
Pełny tekst źródłaCavari, Amnon, i Guy Freedman. "Demographic Divisions". W American Public Opinion Toward Israel, 91–128. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429438028-7.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenia konferencji na temat "Israeli Public opinion"
Mitelman, Amichai, i Yahel Giat. "Transition to a Competitive Consultant Selection Method: A Case Study of a Public Agency in Israel". W InSITE 2022: Informing Science + IT Education Conferences. Informing Science Institute, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/4926.
Pełny tekst źródłaGiat, Yahel, i Amichai Mitelman. "The Wisdom of the Crowds and Cost Overruns in Construction Project Tenders [Abstract]". W InSITE 2021: Informing Science + IT Education Conferences. Informing Science Institute, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/4783.
Pełny tekst źródła