Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Gurwitsch”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Gurwitsch”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Gurwitsch"
1
Moran, Dermot. "Husserl and Gurwitsch on Horizonal Intentionality: The Gurwitch Memorial Lecture 2018". Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 50, nr 1 (20.05.2019): 1–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341352.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Abstract Gurwitsch is the philosopher of consciousness par excellence. This paper presents a systematic exposition of Aron Gurwitsch’s main contribution to phenomenology, namely his theory of the ‘field of consciousness’ with its a priori structure of theme, thematic field, margin (halo and horizon). I present Gurwitsch as an orthodox defender of Husserlian descriptive phenomenology, albeit one who rejected Husserl’s reduction to the transcendental ego and Husserl’s overt idealism. He maintained with Husserl the priority of consciousness as the source of all meaning and validity but he rejected Husserl’s transcendental idealism in favour of a ‘levels of existence’ approach. Gurwitsch’s project was to show the continuity between Gestalt psychology (stripped of its naturalism) and Husserlian eidetics. I explain his concepts of theme, thematic field, margin and horizon as a consistent development of Husserlian thought. I conclude by claiming that neither Gurwitsch nor Husserl fully appreciate how the horizons of an entity can support radical novelty and the application of entirely new contexts.
2
Garfinkel, Harold. "Ethnomethodological Misreading of Aron Gurwitsch on the Phenomenal Field". Human Studies 44, nr 1 (kwiecień 2021): 19–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10746-020-09566-z.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Editors’ AbstractDuring the 1992–1993 academic year, Harold Garfinkel (1917–2011) offered a graduate seminar on Ethnomethodology in the Sociology Department at the University of California, Los Angeles. One topic that was given extensive coverage in the seminar has not been discussed at much length in Garfinkel’s published works to date: Aron Gurwitsch’s treatment of Gestalt theory, and particularly the themes of “phenomenal field” and “praxeological description”. The edited transcript of Garfinkel’s seminar shows why he recommended that “for the serious initiatives of ethnomethodological investigations […] Gurwitsch is a theorist we can’t do without”. Garfinkel’s ethnomethodological “misreading” is not a mistaken reading, but is more a matter of taking Gurwitsch’s phenomenological demonstrations of Gestalt contextures in phenomenal fields and transposing them for making detailed, concrete observations and descriptions of organizationally achieved social phenomena. Where Gurwitsch addresses the organization of perception as an autochthonous achievement, inherent to the stream and field of individual consciousness, Garfinkel extends and elaborates this field into the social world of enacted practices. The April 1993 seminar also is rich with brief asides and digressions in which Garfinkel comments about his use of Alfred Schutz, his attitude toward publishing, his relationship with Erving Goffman, and many other matters.
3
Natsoulas, Thomas. "The Stream of Consciousness: XIII. Bodily Self-Awareness and Aron Gurwitsch's Margin". Imagination, Cognition and Personality 16, nr 3 (marzec 1997): 281–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/e6af-yb5h-ffm6-7j0f.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
According to William James, bodily self-awareness (bodily feeling) is pervasive throughout the stream of consciousness; such awareness is included in each and every pulse of mentality that makes up the stream of consciousness. This installment of the present series of articles begins to consider the role that bodily self-awareness plays in the very structure of the basic durational components of James's stream. The focus here is on an account of this role that the prominent phenomenologist Aron Gurwitsch preferred. Gurwitsch held that pervasive bodily self-awareness belongs to the margin of consciousness; such bodily self-awareness occurs in the form of distinct acts of awareness possessing a separate content from that of the central thematic process which also characterizes every pulse of consciousness. The present article discusses Gurwitsch's account in order to set up a contrast, which will be drawn explicitly in the next installment, with James's more phenomeno-logically integrated conception of pervasive bodily self-awareness.
4
Santos, Hernani Pereira dos. "Husserl e Gurwitsch sobre a Psicologia da Gestalt: um Estudo sobre o "Sensualismo"". Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia 20, nr 4 (17.12.2020): 1108–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/epp.2020.56653.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Este estudo aproxima fenomenologia e Psicologia da Gestalt tendo por eixo o tema do sensualismo na teoria da percepção. Propõe-se analisar a maneira como a Psicologia da Gestalté avaliada dentro do sistema das investigações fenomenológicas de Husserl e de Gurwitsch. Começa-se por uma breve análise da problemática, confrontando os argumentos de Husserl e de Gurwitsch. Na segunda seção, propõe-se uma análise da teoria da percepção desenvolvida por Husserl em Ideias I. Mostra-se como o conceito de hylē desempenha aí um papel central. Na terceira seção, analisam-se as inovações da fenomenologia desenvolvida por Gurwitsch a partir da interpretação proposta pelo autor a respeito da Psicologia da Gestalt. Mostra-se como, para Gurwitsch, esta teoria psicológica renova a compreensão fenomenológica da organização perceptiva e, por isto, descarta uma determinada interpretação do conceito de hylē com base em um novo conceito de intencionalidade. Ao final, algumas conclusões para as duas linhas argumentativas são propostas.
5
Pintos, María-Luz. "Gurwitsch, Goldstein, Merleau-Ponty". Chiasmi International 6 (2005): 147–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/chiasmi2005686.
Pełny tekst źródła
6
Meyer, Christian, i Frank Oberzaucher. "Relevance and embodied reflexivity: constellations work between Gurwitsch, Merleau-Ponty and Garfinkel". SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE, nr 124 (maj 2021): 160–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/sr2021-124010.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This paper draws on Aron Gurwitsch's theory of relevance which was of outstanding importance for both Maurice Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of the body and Harold Garfinkel's ethnomethodology. In the first part we discuss Gurwitsch's conception of relevance in contrast to Schutz'. We then develop a theory of embodied reflexivity drawing on Merleau-Ponty and Garfinkel together with some newer approaches on embodied practice and knowledge. In the second, empirical section we use the concepts and conceptions developed for the description and analysis of selected video recordings of systemic constellation sessions. Systemic constellation is a psychotherapeutic method which is used predominantly in psychological and pedagogical contexts as well as in management consultations. The basic assumption underlying constellations work is that the experiences of representatives are relevant for the person who has initiated the constellation and that they provide information about the issue at hand. The origin, validity, and reliability of the representatives' bodily and relational self-perception is difficult to assess and even more difficult to explain. In our contribution we propose a vocabulary with reference to Gurwitsch, Merleau-Ponty, and Garfinkel, that, as we think, allows for the description of the phenomenon and at the same time throws a light on how relevance can be understood from a sociological perspective inspired by phenomenology.
7
Garrett, Erik. "Strangeness of the Strange". Schutzian Research 13 (2021): 77–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/schutz2021135.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This article reexamines Alfred Schutz’s famous 1944 Stranger essay and the initial criticism of Aron Gurwitsch. I side with Schutz in thinking of the refugee as a special type of stranger. Then to respond to the charge that the essay is not philosophical enough from Gurwitsch, I read Schutz’s notion of the strange with Husserl’s notion of homeworld and Levinas’s notion of fecundity. This allows us to see the philosophical depth of doing a phenomenology of the stranger and strangeness.
8
Marangoni, Pedro Henrique Santos Decanini, i Danilo Saretta Verissimo. "A Autoconsciência na Teoria de Aron Gurwitsch: Posição e Crítica". Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia 20, nr 4 (17.12.2020): 1128–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/epp.2020.56654.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
O objetivo do presente trabalho é apresentar e discutir o modo como o filósofo lituano Aron Gurwitsch concebe o papel da autoconsciência (self-awareness) e da autoconsciência corporal (bodily self-awareness) no interior de sua teoria do campo de consciência. Em um primeiro momento, apresentamos as dimensões do campo de consciência realçando os princípios organizacionais que estão em jogo na integração entre as diferentes estruturas da experiência consciente. Esta contextualização permite compreender a posição ocupada pela autoconsciência naquilo que o filósofo denomina de "margem" da consciência, domínio da experiência caracterizado pela "irrelevância" ou indiferença em relação à apresentação temática – do objeto da atenção. Em um segundo momento, concentrar-nos-emos em descrever a autoconsciência da dimensão encarnada da existência, com o propósito de avaliar os critérios que permitem a Gurwitsch qualificar a autoconsciência corporal sob a rubrica do conceito de "irrelevância". Ao final, esboçamos certos questionamentos à posição de Gurwitsch desenhados a partir de críticas contemporâneas da fenomenologia e das ciências cognitivas à abordagem do autor.
9
Pintos, Maria-Luz. "abstract: Gurwitsch, Goldstein, Merleau-Ponty". Chiasmi International 6 (2005): 171. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/chiasmi2005687.
Pełny tekst źródła
10
Pintos, Maria-Luz. "riassunto: Gurwitsch, Goldstein. Merleau-Ponty". Chiasmi International 6 (2005): 171. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/chiasmi2005688.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Gurwitsch"
1
Santos, Hernani Pereira [UNESP]. "A teoria da intencionalidade nas obras de Husserl e de Gurwitsch: entre fenomenologia transcendental e psicologia da Gestalt". Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/139405.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-07T17:12:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2015-11-19. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2016-06-07T17:17:11Z : No. of bitstreams: 1
000865353.pdf: 1355116 bytes, checksum: 3e4b6a8af144dd7e34932cf527655b61 (MD5)Nosso objetivo é analisar a teoria da intencionalidade de Edmund Husserl, tal como se encontra em seu texto de 1913, Ideias para uma fenomenologia pura e para uma filosofia fenomenológica, e, paralelamente, a teoria da intencionalidade de Aron Gurwitsch, formulada em sua tese de doutoramento, de 1929, intitulada Fenomenologia da temática e do eu puro. Destacamos, por um lado, o método utilizado pelos dois autores para estabelecerem as suas teorias e, por outro lado, os conteúdos específicos de cada uma delas. A pesquisa busca contribuir para a elucidação do papel de Husserl e de Gurwitsch na história da psicologia e da filosofia, para a clarificação das relações possíveis entre fenomenologia transcendental e psicologia empírica e para uma compreensão mais adequada da psicologia fenomenológica que pode ser desenvolvida a partir da teoria da intencionalidade e da fenomenologia constitutiva. O trabalho tem início com uma contextualização histórica e lógica da problemática relacionada aos conceitos de intencionalidade e de descrição psicológica, tendo como ponto de partida a obra de Franz Brentano. Na sequência, o primeiro capítulo apresenta a teoria da redução fenomenológica de Husserl e a sua motivação cartesiana. O segundo capítulo consiste em uma série de análises e descrições sobre a consciência pura e transcendental. O terceiro capítulo consiste em uma apresentação da hipótese de constância, de sua derrogação pela Psicologia da Gestalt e da analogia, feita por Gurwitsch, entre esta e a redução fenomenológica. O quarto capítulo consiste em uma apresentação dos aspectos estruturais da teoria da intencionalidade de Gurwitsch. O quinto capítulo lida com a teoria de Gurwitsch sobre a atenção. O sexto capítulo, por fim, apresenta os principais problemas que Gurwitsch enxerga na concepção egológica da consciência e as principais...
Our goal is to analyze Edmund Husserl's theory of intentionality, as found in his 1913 text, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, and, in parallel, Aron Gurwitsch's theory of intentionality, as formulated in his doctoral thesis, from 1929, entitled Phenomenology of Thematics and of the Pure Ego. We emphasize, on the one hand, the method used by the authors in order to establish their theories, and, on the other hand, the specific contents of each theory. The research aims to contribute to the elucidation of the role of Husserl and Gurwitsch in the history of psychology and philosophy, to the clarification of the possible relations between transcendental phenomenology and empirical psychology, and to provide a better understanding of phenomenological psychology, which can be developed from the theory of intentionality and from constitutive phenomenology. The dissertation begins with providing a historical and logical background for the problems related to the concepts of intentionality and psychological description, taking as depart the work of Franz Brentano. The first chapter introduces Husserl's theory of phenomenological reduction and his Cartesian motivation. The second chapter consists of a series of analyzes and descriptions of pure and transcendental consciousness. The third chapter consists of a presentation of the constancy hypothesis, of its rejection by Gestalt psychology and, then, of the analogy made by Gurwitsch between this rejection and phenomenological reduction. The fourth chapter consists of a presentation of the structural aspects of Gurwitsch's theory of intentionality. The fifth chapter deals with Gurwitsch's theory of attention. Finally, the sixth chapter presents the main problems which Gurwitsch sees in the egological conception of consciousness and the main contributions of his...
2
Santos, Hernani Pereira. "A teoria da intencionalidade nas obras de Husserl e de Gurwitsch : entre fenomenologia transcendental e psicologia da Gestalt /". Assis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/139405.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Orientador: Danilo Saretta VerissimoBanca: Elizabeth Piemonte Constantino
Banca: Sávio Passafaro Peres
Resumo: Nosso objetivo é analisar a teoria da intencionalidade de Edmund Husserl, tal como se encontra em seu texto de 1913, "Ideias para uma fenomenologia pura e para uma filosofia fenomenológica", e, paralelamente, a teoria da intencionalidade de Aron Gurwitsch, formulada em sua tese de doutoramento, de 1929, intitulada "Fenomenologia da temática e do eu puro". Destacamos, por um lado, o método utilizado pelos dois autores para estabelecerem as suas teorias e, por outro lado, os conteúdos específicos de cada uma delas. A pesquisa busca contribuir para a elucidação do papel de Husserl e de Gurwitsch na história da psicologia e da filosofia, para a clarificação das relações possíveis entre fenomenologia transcendental e psicologia empírica e para uma compreensão mais adequada da psicologia fenomenológica que pode ser desenvolvida a partir da teoria da intencionalidade e da fenomenologia constitutiva. O trabalho tem início com uma contextualização histórica e lógica da problemática relacionada aos conceitos de intencionalidade e de descrição psicológica, tendo como ponto de partida a obra de Franz Brentano. Na sequência, o primeiro capítulo apresenta a teoria da redução fenomenológica de Husserl e a sua motivação cartesiana. O segundo capítulo consiste em uma série de análises e descrições sobre a consciência pura e transcendental. O terceiro capítulo consiste em uma apresentação da hipótese de constância, de sua derrogação pela Psicologia da Gestalt e da analogia, feita por Gurwitsch, entre esta e a redução fenomenológica. O quarto capítulo consiste em uma apresentação dos aspectos estruturais da teoria da intencionalidade de Gurwitsch. O quinto capítulo lida com a teoria de Gurwitsch sobre a atenção. O sexto capítulo, por fim, apresenta os principais problemas que Gurwitsch enxerga na "concepção egológica da consciência" e as principais...
Abstract: Our goal is to analyze Edmund Husserl's theory of intentionality, as found in his 1913 text, "Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy", and, in parallel, Aron Gurwitsch's theory of intentionality, as formulated in his doctoral thesis, from 1929, entitled "Phenomenology of Thematics and of the Pure Ego". We emphasize, on the one hand, the method used by the authors in order to establish their theories, and, on the other hand, the specific contents of each theory. The research aims to contribute to the elucidation of the role of Husserl and Gurwitsch in the history of psychology and philosophy, to the clarification of the possible relations between transcendental phenomenology and empirical psychology, and to provide a better understanding of phenomenological psychology, which can be developed from the theory of intentionality and from constitutive phenomenology. The dissertation begins with providing a historical and logical background for the problems related to the concepts of intentionality and psychological description, taking as depart the work of Franz Brentano. The first chapter introduces Husserl's theory of phenomenological reduction and his Cartesian motivation. The second chapter consists of a series of analyzes and descriptions of pure and transcendental consciousness. The third chapter consists of a presentation of the constancy hypothesis, of its rejection by Gestalt psychology and, then, of the analogy made by Gurwitsch between this rejection and phenomenological reduction. The fourth chapter consists of a presentation of the structural aspects of Gurwitsch's theory of intentionality. The fifth chapter deals with Gurwitsch's theory of attention. Finally, the sixth chapter presents the main problems which Gurwitsch sees in the "egological conception of consciousness" and the main contributions of his...
Mestre
3
Bond, Carol Helen, i n/a. "The Development of Students' Experiences of Learning in Higher Education". Griffith University. School of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, 2000. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20051214.111201.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This thesis is concerned with the development of tertiary students' experiences of learning as they progress through three years of undergraduate study in two different psychology programs. Previous research that is relevant to this topic has tended to focus either more narrowly on the development of epistemic beliefs or more broadly on the variation of learners' experiences of learning. Research on epistemic beliefs has tended to focus on the structural aspects (stages) of development and to ignore the content of thinking. In contrast, research on experiences of learning has concentrated upon the content of students' experiences, yet it can be criticised for the way in which it decontextualises students' experiences and for its limited attention to change and development. Moreover, despite evidence suggesting that learning comprises a complex of phenomena such as understanding, memorising and knowing, this line of research has tended to treat learning as a single phenomenon. In the thesis I draw on Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics, Gurwitsch's view of awareness, and much of the conceptual framework of the phenomenographic perspective to argue a case for a theoretical framework and consequential practices that are more plural and inclusive of learner's experiences of learning. The new approach refocuses the relationship between researcher, knower and known in terms of the knowing relation-one that involves a dynamic iterative interweaving of first and second order perspectives. Using this new approach, students' experiences are analysed to provide rich description and ontological explanation of both change and development over time. The approach allows the unity of the partlwholelpart relation of an individual's experience to be recognised. So the method is able to take account of the contextual relevancy of the individual whilst also focusing on the experiences of the group. The results show that rather than comprising a single phenomenon, learning is itself part of a multi-dimensional (depth, spatial and temporal dimensions), multi-phenomenal field. The phenomena of learning, understanding, memorising and knowledge are described in detail, and their individual internal relations are elaborated along with the internal relations between the phenomena. Four main groups of experiences of learning are described within this framework: reproductive experiences; relational experiences; constructive experiences; and transformative experiences. Each of these categories comprises several sub- categories. This fine-grained focus on individual students' data, and the use of the phenomenographic whadhow framework, allows the development of experiences to be traced and interpreted as a gradual morphing over time. The pattern of development suggests that each part of the learners' journey plays an important role in the growth of skill and competence in learning. Thus, it may be important that curricula account for variation not by focussing upon transformative experiences of learning, as is often the case, but by facilitating shifts through all of the experiences that learners may pass through.
4
Bond, Carol Helen. "The Development of Students' Experiences of Learning in Higher Education". Thesis, Griffith University, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367319.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This thesis is concerned with the development of tertiary students' experiences of learning as they progress through three years of undergraduate study in two different psychology programs. Previous research that is relevant to this topic has tended to focus either more narrowly on the development of epistemic beliefs or more broadly on the variation of learners' experiences of learning. Research on epistemic beliefs has tended to focus on the structural aspects (stages) of development and to ignore the content of thinking. In contrast, research on experiences of learning has concentrated upon the content of students' experiences, yet it can be criticised for the way in which it decontextualises students' experiences and for its limited attention to change and development. Moreover, despite evidence suggesting that learning comprises a complex of phenomena such as understanding, memorising and knowing, this line of research has tended to treat learning as a single phenomenon. In the thesis I draw on Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics, Gurwitsch's view of awareness, and much of the conceptual framework of the phenomenographic perspective to argue a case for a theoretical framework and consequential practices that are more plural and inclusive of learner's experiences of learning. The new approach refocuses the relationship between researcher, knower and known in terms of the knowing relation-one that involves a dynamic iterative interweaving of first and second order perspectives. Using this new approach, students' experiences are analysed to provide rich description and ontological explanation of both change and development over time. The approach allows the unity of the partlwholelpart relation of an individual's experience to be recognised. So the method is able to take account of the contextual relevancy of the individual whilst also focusing on the experiences of the group. The results show that rather than comprising a single phenomenon, learning is itself part of a multi-dimensional (depth, spatial and temporal dimensions), multi-phenomenal field. The phenomena of learning, understanding, memorising and knowledge are described in detail, and their individual internal relations are elaborated along with the internal relations between the phenomena. Four main groups of experiences of learning are described within this framework: reproductive experiences; relational experiences; constructive experiences; and transformative experiences. Each of these categories comprises several sub- categories. This fine-grained focus on individual students' data, and the use of the phenomenographic whadhow framework, allows the development of experiences to be traced and interpreted as a gradual morphing over time. The pattern of development suggests that each part of the learners' journey plays an important role in the growth of skill and competence in learning. Thus, it may be important that curricula account for variation not by focussing upon transformative experiences of learning, as is often the case, but by facilitating shifts through all of the experiences that learners may pass through.Thesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
School of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning
Full Text
5
Ferri, M. B. "LA PRIMA RICEZIONE DELLA FENOMENOLOGIA NEGLI STATI UNITI: UN'ANALISI STORICO-CRITICA". Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/171076.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
My research analyzes the characteristics of the first reception of husserlian phenomenology in the United States. The base of this work is a detailed historiographical reconstruction of this phase representing the point of departure of all those studies on phenomenological tradition that have been developed in the American academic world. Several institutions belong to the context in which this reception took place: the New School for Social Research as the original center for the teaching of phenomenology and a number of societies arisen since the sixties to diffuse Husserl’s philosophy in the United States (First Part: Chapter 2 and Chapter 3).
This first reception, promoted since the late thirties by Kaufmann, Schutz, Gurwitsch, Cairns and Farber, must be distinguished from an earlier phase, presenting only the general approach to Husserl’s thought of some American scholars (Second Part: Chapter 1). The origin of the studies of each author undoubtedly typifies their promotion of husserlian phenomenology: Gurwitsch, Schutz and Kaufmann belong to the European tradition, (First Part: Chapter 1) while the Americans Farber and Cairns mainly owe the growing interest in Husserl’s thought to their studies in Freiburg (Second Part: Chapter 2). Nevertheless, during this phase of reception of phenomenology, the original adherence to his lesson – useful to distinguish them from others Husserl’s students emigrated in United States – gradually disappears from their critiques. The aim of my research is to single out the salient features that characterize the different interpretations of Husserl’s thought elaborated by each author, whereas their originality can be indicated as decisive for following developments (Third Part). Gurwitsch builds an interesting critique of Husserl’s whole-part theory, focuses his analysis on the noema, and elaborates a non-egological conception of consciousness. Schutz’s critique of transcendental phenomenology mainly refers to his concept of mundane intersubjectivity. For what concerns Cairns, his few writings published until now don’t allow to deepen the exam on his interpretation. After the arrival in the United States, Kaufmann concentrates his discussion on the relationship between husserlian phenomenology and the logic. Farber proposes a critique which is far from being an original interpretation, although his analysis remains bound to the interest in phenomenology until the end.
With this work I want to explain how the interest about husserlian phenomenology began in the United States, who were its promoters, and also what kind of interpretations they developed in the American academic world. It must be considered that they hadn’t a decisive influence on further developments of phenomenological studies, but in any case helped bringing the attention on Husserl’s thought throughout their teaching.
6
Auger, Louis-Philippe. "L'influence de la psychologie de la forme et de l'idéalisme transcendantal sur l'interprétation du noème perceptif par A. Gurwitsch". Mémoire, 2012. http://www.archipel.uqam.ca/5342/1/M12648.pdf.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Ce projet de recherche entend présenter les enjeux entourant un débat relatif à l'interprétation du noème perceptif dans la phénoménologie husserlienne. Sans prétendre épuiser les tenants et aboutissants d'un tel débat, l'objectif poursuivi dans le contexte actuel consiste plutôt à exposer l'opposition qui se dessine entre deux courants qui ont marqué l'orientation des commentaires portant sur cette notion centrale de la théorie de l'intentionnalité phénoménologique. Cette opposition relève de la confrontation entre les interprétations de A. Gurwitsch et de D. Føllesdal. Tandis que le premier s'inspire de l'idéalisme transcendantal des Idées directrices, le second prend appui sur le réalisme exposé dans les Recherches logiques. Cette confrontation a donné lieu à de vives réactions et l'état actuel de la situation semble avoir donné raison à l'interprétation de Føllesdal. Néanmoins, certains commentateurs reconnaissent que quelques rapprochements sont possibles entre ces deux lectures, en dépit de leurs postulats fondamentaux qui restent irréconciliables. Parmi ces commentateurs ayant dicté en grande partie la direction des discussions subséquentes, il importe de mentionner H. Dreyfus et D. Woodruff Smith. Dans cette optique, ce projet de recherche aura pour tâche de présenter en un premier temps les principales thèses mises de l'avant par Gurwitsch et Føllesdal vers la fin des années 1960 afin de bien saisir la nature du rapport ambigu entre leurs postulats respectifs. Il sera ensuite question de la manière dont le débat s'est cristallisé à compter des années 1970 suite à la présentation qu'en font Dreyfus et W. Smith. Compte tenu de l'issue de cette confrontation, qui favorise maintenant la lecture défendue par Føllesdal, le dernier chapitre tâchera de repositionner la lecture de Gurwitsch dans son contexte d'origine afin de saisir à la fois les sources de son interprétation et les raisons suivant lesquelles cette lecture possède encore aujourd'hui une certaine valeur heuristique pour l'interprétation de ce concept central de la phénoménologie husserlienne qu'est le noème et, plus précisément, le noème perceptif.
______________________________________________________________________________
Książki na temat "Gurwitsch"
1
Der phänomenologische Feldbegriff bei Aron Gurwitsch. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1997.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
2
Aron, Gurwitsch, i Grathoff Richard 1934-, red. Alfred Schütz, Aron Gurwitsch: Briefwechsel, 1939-1959. München: W. Fink, 1985.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
3
Gurwitsch, Aron. The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973). Redaktor Jorge García-Gómez. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2831-0.
Pełny tekst źródła
4
Gurwitsch, Aron. The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973). Redaktor F. Kersten. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2942-3.
Pełny tekst źródła
5
Gurwitsch, Aron. The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901-1973). Redaktor Richard M. Zaner. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3346-8.
Pełny tekst źródła
6
Competing interpretations of Husserl's noema: Gurwitsch versus Smith and McIntyre. New York: Peter Lang, 2009.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
7
Scharlau, Ingrid. Erkenntnistheorie als Wissenschaft: Streitpunkte zwischen Husserl, Gurwitsch, Merleau-Ponty und Piaget. München: W. Fink Verlag, 1998.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
8
Aron, Gurwitsch, Evans Joseph Claude i Stufflebeam Robert S, red. To work at the foundations: Essays in memory of Aron Gurwitsch. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
9
Schutz, Alfred. Philosophers in exile: The correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Aron Gurwitsch, 1939-1959. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródła
10
Russia) Alexander Gurwitsch Conference (2nd 1999 Moscow. Biophotonics and coherent systems: Proceedings of the 2nd Alexander Gurwitsch Conference, and additional contributions. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2000.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaCzęści książek na temat "Gurwitsch"
1
Métraux, Alexandre. "Aron Gurwitsch". W Husserl-Handbuch, 251–54. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05417-3_34.
Pełny tekst źródła
2
Embree, Lester. "Aron Gurwitsch". W Contributions to Phenomenology, 284–87. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5344-9_65.
Pełny tekst źródła
3
Schuhmann, Karl. "Aron Gurwitsch". W Edmund Husserl: Briefwechsel, 1107–21. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0745-7_51.
Pełny tekst źródła
4
Drummond, John J. "Contra Gurwitsch". W Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism, 63–103. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1974-7_5.
Pełny tekst źródła
5
Chelstrom, Eric. "Aron Gurwitsch". W The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Emotion, 153–58. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge handbooks in philosophy: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315180786-14.
Pełny tekst źródła
6
Natanson, Maurice. "Concerning Aron Gurwitsch". W Contributions to Phenomenology, 3–20. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5436-9_1.
Pełny tekst źródła
7
Gurwitsch, Aron. "Biographical Sketch of Aron Gurwitsch". W Phaenomenologica, 41–54. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2831-0_2.
Pełny tekst źródła
8
Stufflebeam, Robert S. "A Bibliography for Gurwitsch Studies". W Contributions to Phenomenology, 261–73. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5436-9_12.
Pełny tekst źródła
9
Kersten, Fred. "The Philosophy of Aron Gurwitsch". W Contributions to Phenomenology, 21–30. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5436-9_2.
Pełny tekst źródła
10
Embree, Lester. "Everyday Relevancy in Gurwitsch and Schutz". W The Schutzian Theory of the Cultural Sciences, 109–21. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13653-0_12.
Pełny tekst źródła