Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Sujet (philosophie)”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Spis treści
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Sujet (philosophie)”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Sujet (philosophie)"
Leroux, Georges. "Le sujet du souci : à propos de l’Histoire de la sexualité de Michel Foucault". Présentation 14, nr 1 (26.07.2007): 5–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/027001ar.
Pełny tekst źródłaBlais, Louise. "Biopolitique". Anthropen, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.17184/eac.anthropen.105.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Foucault, Michel (1926-1984 ; philosophe) – Sujet (philosophie)"
Ségura, Philip. "Michel Foucault : l'espace non-dialectique". Paris 8, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA083689.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe objective was to understand from the sentence of Michel Foucault: "Je n'accepte pas ce mot, dialectique. Non et non ! Il faut que les choses soient bien claires. Dès que l'on prononce le mot "dialectique" on commence à accepter, même si on ne le dit pas, le schéma hégélien de la thèse et de l'antithèse, et avec lui une forme de logique qui me paraît inadéquate, si l'on veut donner de ces problèmes une description vraiment concrète. ", the movement coming from the thought determinations which would go from the plan of immanence towards the modes of conceptualization. Many philosophers allotted to Foucault various periods of evolution of his thinking. I started my study by presupposing that Foucault worked throughout his life around the same level of immanence and that he continuously tried to explain it starting from the knowledge of various socio-history disciplines. And I tried to understand this movement which goes from the level of immanence to a conceptualization of his thinking built around the critical tradition. Foucault wants to proof that philosophy constructed the subject and a system of the human conscience. The dialectics presents itself as the central point of this system. How to understand the presence of the concept by knowing that above all it is the result of the overlapping connection of subject in the socio-history thinking?
Adorno, Francesco. "Vérité et sujet chez Michel Foucault". Paris 8, 1995. http://www.theses.fr/1995PA080974.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe works of foucault bring about an ensemble of problems in which we tried to treat in this work. From one period to another, we encounter a diversity of tone, style and subject among the works the destination and purpose seem uncertain. In particular, two moments reflect this discontinuity: between l'archeologie du savoir et surveiller et punir, foucault changes or seems to change methods; between la volonte de savoir et l'usage des plaisirs et le souci de soi, the project even of a story of sexuality seems to orient itself in a different way. In our opinion, the changes which accent foucault's path represent different moments of the same questioning that can be explained in different ways, but does not constitute less of a coherent path. In our opinion, foucault's fundamental problem was always disecting the processes of subject formation, and making clearer the knowledge which discreetly participates in his constitution. This hypothesis is based on the research of "literary" works: a collection of articles by literary critics; on the other hand we studied the inedited between 1976 and 1984. The first part of this research allowed us to confirm that already at the beginning of the 60's, foucault thought about a series of concepts that will be the basis of his archeo-genealogical method. The second part of this work allowed us to establish the existance of a certain graduality between 1976 and 1984 : in l'usage des plaisirs, foucault does not mention the genealogy of. .
Abe, Takashi. "La méthode archéologique de Michel Foucault : le statut du sujet". Paris 10, 2006. http://www.theses.fr/2006PA100006.
Pełny tekst źródłaIn this study, the works of Foucault were chronologically examined. Analysis was made on the development of his philosophical method known as archaeology, and on its dominant topic : the subject. Foucault treated the concept of subject as an operational concept, through which his research was realized. Through the 1960s, in parallel with the development of archaeology, he criticized the epistemic function of the subject, which was the very basis of Human Sciences. At the end of the 1960s, through a radical reconstruction of the archaeological method, he discovered a new object of research the discourse. On the basis of such methodological change, the new research examined the status of the subject differently. The concept of "subjectification" was introduced in order to describe a dynamic process interrelated with the function of power, in which subjectivity is formed. This process of subjectification further introduced the dimension of ethics
Kozlowski, Michal. "Fonctions du discours et figures du sujet : Michel Foucault, théoricien de la liberté". Paris, EHESS, 2004. http://www.theses.fr/2004EHES0073.
Pełny tekst źródłaMichel Foucault is often perceived as the one willing to deconstruct the very idea of the subject. In my analysis I attempt to show the contrary. Foucault's cautious work aims at the reconstruction of the concept of the subject in order to think it through both it its limitations and the possibilities to realiza its freedom. In that perspective I account for two key notions that Foucault works out : the one of the actuality abd the one of the genealogy. I introduce in Foucault theoretical structure the spinozian concept of conatus understood, as permanent will of the self-constitution of a subject by the subject. These three notions together let me account for political strategies of emancipation in the Foucaultian sense. The main argument developed in my dissertation leads to the conclusion that Michel Foucault far from being a new conservatism offers as a matter of the new visions of progressivism, a skeptical one perhaps but genuinely mature
Lemoine, Simon. "Contributions à une philosophie du dispositif, Usages de Foucault". Poitiers, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011POIT5012.
Pełny tekst źródłaA significant part of human relations is unthought. Those invisible relations, are diffuse, heterogeneous, variegated, mediated, delayed, amplified, hybridized, beyond the thinking-understanding. In many places, those relations turn to the advantage of mechanisms. In other words, they lead the subject to do thousands of things that he would not have done on his own, and also gradually modeled the subject according to their goals (they have gradually modeled a subject ergonomic, persistent, oriented, etc. ). Those determined relations are taking place largely in the microphysical dimension, usually neglected. A careful study of mechanisms brings us to perceive the existence and importance of that largely unexplored continent
Hong, Ki-Sook. "Problématique du sujet et ontologie chez Deleuze". Paris 8, 2006. http://www.theses.fr/2006PA082644.
Pełny tekst źródłaOur research consists in analysis about the concept of subject which intervenes in the event and must be faithful in the new situation after the event. We examine most of all the problem of ontology for this analysis, because we want to define the concept of subject as the name which is different than ontology’s term. We choose G. Deleuze who is a philosopher contemporary. That is, our research clarifies in development of Deleuze’s ontology and subject. The study is divided into six sections. 1) Investigation of the concept of subject today, ontology, and the question of subject and ontology in Deleuze 2) multiples heterogeneous as pure becoming 3) event and sense 4) champ of virtual 5) time and its sovereignty 6) inside of thought: “subjectivation”. Our conception of the subject which is distant from Deleuze’s thought is decided by the singular topology where the chance of the event is material of the subject and the truth
Combes, Muriel. "La vie inséparée : vie et sujet entre biopouvoir et politique". Paris 8, 2002. http://octaviana.fr/document/18047362X#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0.
Pełny tekst źródłaBetween 1976 and 1979, Michel Foucault elaborates the concept of "biopower", which indicates the moment when, around the 18th century, life itself - the individuals and the populations - becomes part of the mechanisms of power and an essential stake in politics. At the beginning of the eighties, Foucault's work seems to branch out into a reflection about ethics. Rather than a rupture, one can see appearing a fundamental quadrilateral of concepts, which joins together truth, power, subject and life. Among those concepts, the one which has interested Foucault least is the one of life. In order to elaborate it, we've taken here two ways: a renewal of an ontological mode of thought, in order to clarify the relationship between life and subjectivity and an explanation of the function of sciences in biopower necessitating a critique of epistemology. Our aim is to question the involvement of life in politics. In each case, the assumption in play is that life cannot be conceived separately from subjectivity
Fujita, Kojiro. "Pour une philosophie de la subjectivation. Etude sur Michel Foucault". Thesis, Paris Est, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PESC0002/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaThis thesis seeks to shed light on the philosophy of the subjectivation in the work of Michel Foucault. From our perspective, the early Foucault (from Madness and Civilization to The Order of Things) strived to overcome the philosophy of the subject in order to advance a thought of anonymity, but the later Foucault (from The Archaeology of Knowledge to The History of Sexuality) attempted to take up the problem of the subject again beyond that anonymity so as to finally elaborate the concept of subjectivation. Hence, our thesis inquires how the later Foucault continued to re-examine the subject in three anonymous domains – knowledge, power and ethics –, in order to extract from Foucault’s works what one can finally call the philosophy of the subjectivation. Thus this philosophy consists of three elements: the logic of the subjectivation, the politics of the subjectivation and the ethics of the subjectivation. Since most existing studies are related to the later element, our thesis is primarily devoted to the former two. The first half of the thesis addresses the logic of the subjectivation to reveal our existence in the system of knowledge, and the second half deals with the politics of the subjectivation to reveal our existence in that of power. Theses researches can no longer be accomplished by traditional thoughts (realism of scientific objectivity, phenomenology of transcendental subjectivity, epistemology of ideal forms, hermeneutics of fundamental meaning, etc.), which are never foreign to the philosophy of the subject, but only by Foucault’s thought itself, which is well destined to the philosophy of the subjectivation. Thus, our thesis reads Foucault’s thought by this same thought itself in order to extract the philosophy of the subjectivation from there. However, ultimately, it not only explores the concept of subjectivation, but also paradoxically sheds light on what one can call the “counter-subjectivation”
Jacinthe, Fodnot. "L’éthique publique, de l’équité de la justice chez Rawls à la norme, la biopolitique et la vérité chez Foucault". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 8, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022PA080087.
Pełny tekst źródłaMy public ethics as a reflection between humanity and sovereignty shows a double contribution of the political subject and the state in the production of the values that we need collectively. The political subject brings a word or a speech inspired by the human fundamental needs and the human conditional of life. The human point of view discussed inside this work is also understood by the rawlsian inviolability of the person and the human rights as priority which express a lot of preoccupations toward mankind as dignified creatures. Moreover, the foucaldian biopolitics suggests a system of state control of the mankind as a biological being and also taking care of their human nature. The dynamism of the political subject is not able to weaken the state encouragement to increase the power, his enlightenment and his influence, and his perpetuity. The public ethics set up a space of justification and legitimization of the public decisions and the behavior of every body. That will be in the advantage of the well-being of the community collectively and the comfort of everybody specially when the commitment of the political subject brings him to tell the truth about himself, his life and the condition of life. John Rawls by his equity and his justice system provides values giving man and woman access to comfort and well-being in his well organized society against all sense of utilitarianism. Because, a society with constitutional democracy provides a system of values previously accepted for the absolute respect of the person, from which perceiving the equitable distribution of property (fundamental liberties, the distribution of the resources and the country’s wealth on the profit of desadvantaged and poor people, and values aiming for durable political consensus). Even though, the political and legal reality, the constancy of the fight justify mostly the effectiveness of those values
Koll, Peter. "Risque et naturalité. De la naissance de l'objet 'société' et la (dé-)subjectivation : une généalogie". Paris 8, 2011. http://octaviana.fr/document/156506394#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe object of the following text appears as a genealogy of risk. This appearance is conveyed first through a reading of the sociological meaning risk has taken, according to which risk concerns the very structure of modern society. Thus the genealogy we undertake will concern the birth of the object called 'society', which indeed appears firstly as a new type of objectivity. In order to grasp the meaning of this latter concept, understood as a discursive function, we propose to 'read' – in the texts of so-called classical sociology – "society" as a function on a (discursive) field of naturality. Based on this thesis an account is developed of the paradoxical nature of naturality, which paradox can be expressed as the 'internal outside of society'. This paradox will allow us to fully appreciate the genealogical meaning of risk, which will then appear as the dispositif that expresses and reinforces the paradox which is inherent to the nature of society