Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Equality of opportunity”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Spis treści
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Equality of opportunity”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Equality of opportunity"
Ooghe, Erwin, Erik Schokkaert i Dirk Van de gaer. "Equality of Opportunity versus Equality of Opportunity Sets". Social Choice and Welfare 28, nr 2 (31.05.2006): 209–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0165-4.
Pełny tekst źródłaBennett, Kim. "Equality and opportunity". Nursing Standard 4, nr 31 (25.04.1990): 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.4.31.59.s51.
Pełny tekst źródłaBarrett, Richard. "Equality of Opportunity". Economic Journal 112, nr 480 (1.06.2002): F383—F384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.t01-15-00050.
Pełny tekst źródłaKampe, Cornelius. "Equality of Opportunity". Social Philosophy Today 1 (1988): 113–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/socphiltoday1988130.
Pełny tekst źródłaYoung, Robert. "EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY". Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70, nr 3 (wrzesień 1989): 261–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1989.tb00382.x.
Pełny tekst źródłaSreenivasan, Gopal. "Equality, opportunity, ambiguity". Politics, Philosophy & Economics 13, nr 1 (22.07.2013): 82–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470594x13496071.
Pełny tekst źródłaRichards, Janet Radcliffe. "Equality of Opportunity". Ratio 10, nr 3 (grudzień 1997): 253–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00044.
Pełny tekst źródłaHild, Matthias, i Alex Voorhoeve. "EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND OPPORTUNITY DOMINANCE". Economics and Philosophy 20, nr 1 (kwiecień 2004): 117–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266267104001282.
Pełny tekst źródłaKodelja, Zdenko. "Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Outcome". Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal 6, nr 2 (30.06.2016): 9–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.85.
Pełny tekst źródłaRoemer, John E. "Defending Equality of Opportunity". Monist 86, nr 2 (2003): 261–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/monist200386210.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Equality of opportunity"
Cavanagh, Matthew. "Equality and opportunity". Thesis, University of Oxford, 1999. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.324550.
Pełny tekst źródłaCousin, Glynis. "Theorising equality of opportunity". Thesis, University of Warwick, 1995. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/4330/.
Pełny tekst źródłaSapata, Christelle. "Essays on Equality of Opportunity". Doctoral thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/107956.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe theory of equality of opportunity leads to legitimate some inequalities: inequalities due to factors for which the individual can be held responsible are fair. On the contrary, when inequalities are due to factors that are beyond individual's responsibility, these inequalities are unfair and should be removed. Even though a consensus emerges about the cut between fair and unfair inequalities, distinct measurement strategies have emerged and may lead to distinct conclusions. In this thesis, we study three aspects concerning the measurement of equality of opportunity to assess the impact of the techniques used on the conclusions about unfair inequalities. To measure inequality of opportunity, we can (1) measure the impact of one or several non-responsibility factors on individuals' outcomes, (2) account or not for the indirect impact of non-responsibility factors on responsibility factors and (3) move the cut that separates both types of factors. The first chapter investigates to which extent the magnitude of inequality of opportunity is sensitive to the change in one of these three decisions. We perform the analysis for Spain and find that the magnitude of ex-ante inequality of opportunity is sensitive to the inclusion of several non-responsibility factors. Family background is found to explain inequalities in income, but other non-responsibility variables such as country of birth are also found to be important determinants of inequalities. The indirect effect of non-responsibility factors is found to be of main importance as it explains around half the overall inequality of opportunity. Finally, the cut between responsibility and non-responsibility factors is not found to be of main impact as the variables that are obviously beyond individuals' responsibility are the ones that impact the most on inequality. The second chapter addresses two questions: Is effort equally rewarded across regions of France and is ex-post inequality of opportunity distributed in the same way as income? To this end, we estimate a wage equation as a function of circumstance and effort variables. We calculate the fair income which is the income that depends on effort only and we take the distance between the actual earnings and the fair income to obtain a measure of ex-post inequality of opportunity. We exhibit the presence of inequality of opportunity in all the regions of France and the way responsibility factors are rewarded differ across regions. On the other hand, the rankings of the regions in terms of equality of opportunity and inequality in income change slightly, which is consistent with other studies on the correlation between income inequality and inequality of opportunity. In the third chapter, we assume individuals have heterogeneous preferences on consumption and leisure. In this case, the criteria of equality of opportunity have to be adapted as proposed by Fleurbaey and Maniquet. Our aim is to propose a model to apply these criteria and make them comparable with cardinal criteria. To this end, we start from a model that identifies groups' preferences and we make use of information on individuals' choices to approximate individuals' preferences. We also propose two ways of cardinalizing our measure such as to compare our results with two cardinal criteria. We show very little matching among the criteria. The target of redistribution policy changes as we move from the egalitarian equivalence criterion to the conditional equality criterion. Then, we find strong similarities between Van de gaer's criterion and the conditional equality criterion. Roemer's criterion appears to give very distinct conclusions with respect to the other three criteria. To conclude, the difference in the results given by each criterion shows that the strategies of measurement are at least as important as the criterion used.
Voorhoeve, Alexander Edmund. "Equal opportunity, equality, and responsibility". Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2006. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1446749/.
Pełny tekst źródłaPIGNATARO, GIUSEPPE. "Essays on Equality of opportunity". Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/363.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe economic literature on equality of opportunity suggests non-welfarist foundations of social choice introducing the concepts of freedoms and liberties of individuals in the assessment of social welfare. The opportunity egalitarian principle does not focus on equality of outcomes but essentially on equality of means to realize those outcomes, i.e., it places some responsibilities on individuals to decide how much effort to pay in order to exploit the opportunity offered to them. This concept refers to be a part of conventional wisdom and has a long tradition and wide acceptance. On these grounds chapter 1 is devoted to a review of the most recent research on equality of opportunity. Some economists and political philosophers have argued that, in examining distributional questions, instead of focusing on differences in observed incomes or current levels of welfare, it is more appropriate to focus on the choice or opportunity sets that individuals face. Chapter 2 focus on the measurement of the degree of equality of opportunity based on alternative decompositions of the Atkinson index of equality according to welfare theory approach. In chapter 3 we address a measurement in health using data from the British Household Panel Survey (1996-2005). Our results suggest a great incidence of the direct effect of the individual behaviors in terms of lifestyles reducing the indirect contribution of social background. Public health programs are more likely to produce results if targeted on individual responsibility. A different point at issue is tackled in chapter 4 where we introduce the relationship between equality of opportunity and efficiency in the credit market. We show that richer individuals participate more in the credit market even when relatively more averse to effort violating the equality of opportunity principle. Moreover, we find that marginal richer borrowers exert less effort than poorer ones in equilibrium. Empirical evidence in Italy points to a limited impact of policy measures aimed at increasing credit opportunities without targeting accurately the beneficiaries.
PIGNATARO, GIUSEPPE. "Essays on Equality of opportunity". Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/363.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe economic literature on equality of opportunity suggests non-welfarist foundations of social choice introducing the concepts of freedoms and liberties of individuals in the assessment of social welfare. The opportunity egalitarian principle does not focus on equality of outcomes but essentially on equality of means to realize those outcomes, i.e., it places some responsibilities on individuals to decide how much effort to pay in order to exploit the opportunity offered to them. This concept refers to be a part of conventional wisdom and has a long tradition and wide acceptance. On these grounds chapter 1 is devoted to a review of the most recent research on equality of opportunity. Some economists and political philosophers have argued that, in examining distributional questions, instead of focusing on differences in observed incomes or current levels of welfare, it is more appropriate to focus on the choice or opportunity sets that individuals face. Chapter 2 focus on the measurement of the degree of equality of opportunity based on alternative decompositions of the Atkinson index of equality according to welfare theory approach. In chapter 3 we address a measurement in health using data from the British Household Panel Survey (1996-2005). Our results suggest a great incidence of the direct effect of the individual behaviors in terms of lifestyles reducing the indirect contribution of social background. Public health programs are more likely to produce results if targeted on individual responsibility. A different point at issue is tackled in chapter 4 where we introduce the relationship between equality of opportunity and efficiency in the credit market. We show that richer individuals participate more in the credit market even when relatively more averse to effort violating the equality of opportunity principle. Moreover, we find that marginal richer borrowers exert less effort than poorer ones in equilibrium. Empirical evidence in Italy points to a limited impact of policy measures aimed at increasing credit opportunities without targeting accurately the beneficiaries.
Nilsson, William. "Equality of opportunity, heterogeneity and poverty". Doctoral thesis, Umeå : Umeå University, 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-518.
Pełny tekst źródłaLazenby, Hugh T. C. "A conception of equality of opportunity". Thesis, University of Oxford, 2011. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9aa71505-3263-429d-bbb7-8f5bd5e06625.
Pełny tekst źródłaSalas, Gonzalo. "Essays on equality of opportunity and public policy". Doctoral thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/400568.
Pełny tekst źródłaThis thesis is structured around the notion of equal opportunities, a concept first proposed by Arneson (1989), whose philosophical foundations are deeply influenced by the proposals of Rawls (1971). From this perspective there is no justification for the existence of differentiating circumstances arising from luck or natural endowment, while everything which is under the control of the person is the responsibility of the individual and society should not concern itself with establishing compensatory mechanisms. In this sense, Roemer (1998) notes that public policy should be responsible for leveling the playing field by equaling the opportunities and starting conditions of the people in order to be able to access an advantage. In the different chapters of this thesis I aim to contribute to different areas of this field by providing empirical evidence for the case of Uruguay. I focus on the link between equality of opportunities and public policy. The public policies that are analyzed put a focus on education, explicitly in some cases and indirectly in others. I consider an income transfer program, the Plan de Atención Nacional a la Emergencia Social (PANES), and a policy oriented to early childhood based on increasing places in public schools. In the literature reviewed the studies that casually link targeted public policies with inequality of opportunities are scarce (Ham, 2010; Van der gaer, 2011), with a greater number of studies focusing on analyzing the impact of policies oriented to early childhood (for example, Baker et al, 2008; Urzúa & Veramendi, 2011; Conti & Heckman, 2012; Felfe & Lalive, 2014). In the latter case there is less emphasis on the effects on equality of opportunities, so it is not possible to attribute responsibility to the children for their performance. However, in Andreoli, Havnes & Lefranc (2014) an effort was made to link the literature based on equality of opportunities and the expansion of public schools aimed at early childhood. The remaining chapter focuses on the study of preferences for redistributive policies considering different normative approaches that have been used to measure equality of opportunity. There are also several papers that have attempted to understand the role played by the perceptions of fairness of individuals in the aforementioned preferences (Fong, 2001; Alesina and Angeletos, 2005; Alesina and Giuliano, 2009). I attempt to link these two areas, which have a string subjective element, with greater precision. Specifically, I study the extent to which preferences for redistribution may be determined by heterogeneous individual perceptions about inequality of opportunity. Particular emphasis is placed on the theoretical arguments underlying the idea that perceptions of fairness influence the utility of individuals, where they see their preferences for redistribution reflected. Unlike the chapters which precede it, and which focus on explanations based on the altruism of people, in this chapter the argument shifts towards the reciprocity generated by the interaction among individuals. This last element associates the role played by the sense of fairness with the identity of the people (Akerlof and Kranton, 2010), and is therefore formed from the interaction with the peer group.
Short, Myriah J. "Equality of Opportunity: Equal Access to Higher Education". Ohio : Ohio University, 2009. http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/view.cgi?ohiou1229624814.
Pełny tekst źródłaKsiążki na temat "Equality of opportunity"
Equality of opportunity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1998.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaRoemer, John E. Equality of opportunity. Cambridge: Harvard university press, 1998.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaBusiness & Technology Education Council. Equality of opportunity. London: BTEC, 1992.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaFrankel, Paul Ellen, i Bowling Green State University. Social Philosophy and Policy Center., red. Equal opportunity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell for the Social Philosophy and Policy Center, Bowling Green State University, 1987.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaCousin, Glynis. Theorising equality of opportunity. [s.l.]: typescript, 1995.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaSamuel, Coleman James. Equality of educational opportunity. Salem, N.H: Ayer Co., 1988.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaDickson, Peter. Towards equality of opportunity. [Slough]: NFER, 1993.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaSardoč, Mitja, red. Handbook of Equality of Opportunity. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52269-2.
Pełny tekst źródłaBusiness and Technician Education Council. Equality of opportunity for education. London: the Council, 1986.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaSchütz, Gabriela. Education policy and equality of opportunity. Bonn, Germany: IZA, 2005.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaCzęści książek na temat "Equality of opportunity"
Siboni, Benedetta, i Giovanna Galizzi. "Equality of Opportunity". W Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management, 1–5. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_689-1.
Pełny tekst źródłaReisman, David. "Equality of Opportunity". W Crosland's Future, 56–107. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230376687_3.
Pełny tekst źródłaRoemer, John E. "Equality of Opportunity". W The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 3840–47. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2223.
Pełny tekst źródłaRoemer, John E. "Equality of Opportunity". W The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 1–8. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2223-1.
Pełny tekst źródłaHansson, Sven Ove. "Equal Opportunity". W Handbook of Equality of Opportunity, 1–24. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52269-2_2-1.
Pełny tekst źródłaArmstrong, Chris. "Global Equality of Opportunity". W Encyclopedia of Global Justice, 410–11. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_277.
Pełny tekst źródłaNavin, Mark C. "Fair Equality of Opportunity". W Encyclopedia of Global Justice, 331–32. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_9.
Pełny tekst źródłaSpring, Joel. "Equality of Educational Opportunity". W American Education, 94–126. Wyd. 20. Twentieth edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003093251-5.
Pełny tekst źródłaLægaard, Sune. "Equality of Opportunity and Religion". W Handbook of Equality of Opportunity, 1–22. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52269-2_1-1.
Pełny tekst źródłaStone, Peter. "Democracy and Equality of Opportunity". W Handbook of Equality of Opportunity, 1–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52269-2_3-1.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenia konferencji na temat "Equality of opportunity"
Liu, David, Zohair Shafi, William Fleisher, Tina Eliassi-Rad i Scott Alfeld. "RAWLSNET: Altering Bayesian Networks to Encode Rawlsian Fair Equality of Opportunity". W AIES '21: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462618.
Pełny tekst źródłaHeidari, Hoda, Michele Loi, Krishna P. Gummadi i Andreas Krause. "A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity". W FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287584.
Pełny tekst źródłaSuwarno, Peter. "Equality in Education and Employment for Sustainable Development of Diverse Indonesia: Enhancing Equal Opportunity, Volunteerism, and Philanthropy". W Proceedings of the 1st Non Formal Education International Conference (NFEIC 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/nfeic-18.2019.1.
Pełny tekst źródłaLi, Henan. "Criminal Law Regulation of Legal Means to Defraud the National Welfare Behavior--from the Perspective of Equality of Opportunity Protection". W 2017 3rd International Conference on Economics, Social Science, Arts, Education and Management Engineering (ESSAEME 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/essaeme-17.2017.244.
Pełny tekst źródłaLučić, Sonja. "JAČANjE PRINCIPA NEUTRALNOSTI INTERNETA KROZ PRAKSU SUDA PRAVDE EU". W XVII majsko savetovanje. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/uvp21.505l.
Pełny tekst źródłaSemiz, Marina. "Komparativni osvrt na visoko obrazovanje tokom pandemije kovid-19". W Nauka, nastava, učenje u izmenjenom društvenom kontekstu. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Education in Uzice, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/nnu21.055s.
Pełny tekst źródłaAngelova-Igova, Boryana, i Ivan Slavchev. "SOME GENDER ISSUES AROUND SPORTS OFFICIALS IN THE CONTEMPORARY BULGARIAN SOCIETY". W INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONGRESS “APPLIED SPORTS SCIENCES”. Scientific Publishing House NSA Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37393/icass2022/73.
Pełny tekst źródłaMarinelli, Melissa Jane, Linley Lord i Sally Male. "Early career patterns, experiences, and influences: reflections from women engineers in senior roles". W SEFI 50th Annual conference of The European Society for Engineering Education. Barcelona: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788412322262.1361.
Pełny tekst źródłaJumani, Nabi Bux, Fouzia Ajmal, Samina Malik i Fatima Maqsood. "Online Education as a Key to Bridge Gender Digital Divide in Pakistan". W Tenth Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning. Commonwealth of Learning, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56059/pcf10.9275.
Pełny tekst źródłaBozkaya, Gülferah. "The Role of Social Protection Expenditure in the Fight against Poverty". W International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c05.00990.
Pełny tekst źródłaRaporty organizacyjne na temat "Equality of opportunity"
Benabou, Roland, i Efe Ok. Mobility as Progressivity: Ranking Income Processes According to Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, sierpień 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w8431.
Pełny tekst źródłaMott, Joanna, Heather Brown, Di Kilsby, Emily Eller i Tshering Choden. Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Self-Assessment Tool. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), kwiecień 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/slh.2021.016.
Pełny tekst źródłaSexton, Porter. A computer decision support system to assist in providing equality of educational opportunity. Portland State University Library, styczeń 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.795.
Pełny tekst źródłaAndrews, Rodney, i Kevin Stange. Price Regulation, Price Discrimination, and Equality of Opportunity in Higher Education: Evidence from Texas. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, grudzień 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w22901.
Pełny tekst źródłaCascio, Elizabeth, Nora Gordon i Sarah Reber. Federal Aid and Equality of Educational Opportunity: Evidence from the Introduction of Title I in the South. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, czerwiec 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w17155.
Pełny tekst źródłaSung, Seung Yong. Reproduction of 'Equality of opportunity and human capital accumulation: Motivational effect of a nationwide scholarship in Colombia'. Social Science Reproduction Platform, kwiecień 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.48152/ssrp-5t1m-4n04.
Pełny tekst źródłaLazonick, William, Philip Moss i Joshua Weitz. Equality Denied: Tech and African Americans. Institute for New Economic Thinking, luty 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36687/inetwp177.
Pełny tekst źródłaSmith, Mary. Equality of Educational Opportunity for Language Minority Students in Oregon: A Survey of ESL/Bilingual Education Policy in Local School Districts. Portland State University Library, styczeń 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.382.
Pełny tekst źródłaOloo, Ruth, i Amber Parkes. Addressing Unpaid Care and Domestic Work for a Gender-equal and Inclusive Kenya: WE-Care policy briefing. Oxfam, kwiecień 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21201/2021.7314.
Pełny tekst źródłaMwiine, Amon Ashaba, Josephine Ahikire, Jovah Katushabe, Harriet Pamara i Aklam Amanya. Unravelling Backlash in the Journey of Legislating Sexual Offences in Uganda. Institute of Development Studies, styczeń 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ids.2023.007.
Pełny tekst źródła