Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Early Chalcolithique”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Spis treści
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Early Chalcolithique”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Early Chalcolithique"
Diaconescu, Dragoş. "Considerations concerning the chronology of the early Copper Age Tiszapolgár culture". Praehistorische Zeitschrift 89, nr 2 (30.06.2014): 219–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pz-2014-0016.
Pełny tekst źródłaBrummack, Sven, i Dragoş Diaconescu. "A Bayesian approach to the AMS dates for the Copper Age in the Great Hungarian Plain". Praehistorische Zeitschrift 89, nr 2 (30.06.2014): 242–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pz-2014-0017.
Pełny tekst źródłaDiaconescu, Dragoş. "Remarks on the chronology of the Lengyel culture in the western half of the Carpathian Basin based on the analysis of funerary assemblages". Praehistorische Zeitschrift 89, nr 1 (1.01.2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pz-2014-0002.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Early Chalcolithique"
Parkinson, William A. "The social organization of early copper age tribes on the great Hungarian plain /". Oxford : Archaeopress, 2006. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb41000623x.
Pełny tekst źródłaCutting, Marion Valerie. "The neolithic and early chalcolithic farmers of Central and Southwest Anatolia : household, community and the changing use of space /". Oxford : Archaeopress, 2005. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb40098203v.
Pełny tekst źródłaVinet, Alice. "Interactions régionales sur le plateau anatolien au Chalcolithique ancien : approche techno-fonctionnelle de l'industrie en obsidienne de Catalhöyük-Ouest et Teoeçik Ciftlik". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 1, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022PA01H043.
Pełny tekst źródłaBeginning in the Late Neolithic (ca. 6500 BC), profound changes took place in central Anatolia that affected numerous aspects of daily life among local communities. These changes demonstrate increased social competition as expressed in funeral practices, craft production, human and pastoral mobility, and social interactions. The lithic industry, however, does not seem to be impacted by these upheavals. Central Anatolia, with its widely distributed obsidian sources, is a key region for investigating community development through the lenses of raw material exploitation, economy, and technology. The objective of this dissertation was to characterize interregional interaction on the Anatolian plateau, specifically between the Konya Plain and Cappadocia, through the techno-functional analysis of two lithic assemblages. We have thus retraced the behaviours related to the production, use, and abandonment of the obsidian industry of Tepecik Çiftlik (Cappadocia) and Çatalhöyük West (Konya plain). Circa 6000 BC, contact between the Konya Plain and Cappadocia does not seem to have impacted the lithic industry of these two regions. Regional cultural facies seem to exist between 6000 and 5500 BC in central Anatolia
Guyot, Frédéric. "Evolution des sociétés prédynastiques et contacts interrégionaux en Egypte et au Levant sud (fin du 5e et première moitié du 4e millénaire)". Thesis, Paris 1, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010623.
Pełny tekst źródłaThis study intends to provide elements for an analysis of the evolution of Predynastic and Southern Levant cultures, between the end of the 5th and the middle of the 4th millennium (4300-3300 BC). In Egypt, this period starts at the beginning of the Predynastic era, when groups of agro-pastoralists settled gradually along the Nile Valley and the Delta. It ends with the advent of a hierarchical society and the setting of the conditions conductive to the emergence of State at the beginning the 3rd millennium. In the Southern Levant, this time frame extends from the end of the Chalcolithic to the beginning of the Early Bronze Age I. Through the analysis of an unpublished material (the Predynastic pottery from Tell el-Iswid in the Nile Delta, the dwellings of the Chalcolithic settlement of Bi r es-Safadi in the Northern Negev), and the reappraisal of published data (the architecture of Tuleilat Ghassul in the South of the Jordan Valley or the Minshat Abu Omar cemetery in Lower Egypt for example), this study aims to assess to what extent the development of societies in Upper Egypt, Lower Egypt and the Southern Levant was affected by interregional contacts. The issue is to estimate what kind of technical innovations, economic or social influences, these exchanges could have conveyed. The purpose is also to provide details on the modality of these contacts and the organization of these exchanges (down-the-line or long distance networks). This will lead us to propose a new approach to the homogenisation process of the Egyptian culture, which took place shortly before the political unification of the country
Sultan, Ahmad. "Tell Kashkashok III (Syrie du Nord) et la question de l'urbanisation de la Jazireh syrienne (Ve - IIIe millénaire av. n. è.)". Thesis, Strasbourg, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019STRAG046.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe purpose of this research is to provide readers new data from one of the very few sites in the syrian Jazireh namely Tell Kashkashok III which contains a long and continuous sequence of occupation spanning three thousand years, extending from the 5th until the third millenniumB.C. The site documents several periods of the history of Northern Mesopotamia (Obeid, Late Chalcolithic and Archaic Jazireh), each of which is a milestone in the process that led to the emergence of cities in Northern Syria. These archaeological data provide new insights into the nature of development of an urban society in northern Syria. The urban planning elements brought by Kashkashok III reside indeed in the diversity of the monumental architectural remains that the site has produced. They allow to feed the scientific researches on the evolution of settlements in Mesopotamia of the North since the beginning of the 5th millennium B.C
Ossman, Mouheyddine. "La culture matérielle de la Mésopotamie du Nord et de ses voisins, d’après l’étude de la céramique, de l’Uruk récent au Bronze ancien I/II". Thesis, Lyon 2, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013LYO20006.
Pełny tekst źródłaDuring the 4th millennium, Mesopotamia and its neighbours were connected by a vast trade network which was established by Urukians throughout their expansion into Iran and Northern Mesopotamia. At the end of the 4th millennium and at the beginning of the 3rd, all those regions faced a phase crisis whose causes are unknown for us because of the absence of the written documents dated to this phase. At this phase, the Uruk trade network and colonization in Iran and Northern Mesopotamia were collapsed. Uruk sites have been abandoned. In addition, a large number of indigenous sites were abandoned. The contact between Northern and Southern Mesopotamian was suspended. However, other sites were founded in Iran and Mesopotamia. Although, with this crucial phase, the Mesopotamian ceramic culture did not change deeply, the painting traditions reappeared suddenly whereas the Mesopotamian had abandoned them since 9 centuries c. (in Post-Obaid).Three zones with painted ceramics appear in Mesopotamia: centre of Iraq, Eastern Iraq, North Iraq and North-Eastern Syria. Also, Iran employed massively the painting. However, the land of Sumer conserved the Uruk traditions which aren’t painted. Worthily to be noted that the painting traditions existed in Iran before and even during the Uruk expansion. Moreover, a corridor of contact seems to have existed linking Western Iran to those three zones. But, how can one explain this reappearance phenomenon of this painting in the centre and North Mesopotamia: is-it because of the displacements of the Iranian groups into Mesopotamia or is it a simple influence? Likewise, one cannot treat the question of the end of the 4th millennium without being confronted with the problem of the destiny of the Urukians colonists. Those latter lived in the periphery more than 4 centuries during the expansion. On the other hand, one is confronted with the problem of the foundation of urban-cities with the all beginning of the 3rd millennium (Mari, Terqa, Kharab Sayyar and Chuera). To answer these questions, we chose site-keys in Iran and Mesopotamia. First of all, we studied, site by site, their ceramic (and others materials) according to their stratigraphical position (strato-ceramic), and then based on their distribution in the landscape. At the same time, those strato-ceramics analyses have been combined with another study concerning changes in the occupation of landscape (abandonment and foundation), and the cultural transformations, especially for the North-Western and Western Iran where the transcaucasian expansion extends to Kermanshah and Northern Luristan in central Zagros.Based on ceramic comparisons and on other archaeological aspects, we attempted to correlate between the stratigraphy of the studied sites. We avoided making of a site or of a region the “Center of the World”. We rather looked at each site and region starting from its neighbours. At the end of each part or chapter, we linked between the studied regions, from the cultural point of view, stratigraphic and occupational, in order to try to draw a historic conclusion concerning the passage between the 4th and the 3rd millennium.Towards 2700-2600 B.C., the painting traditions disappeared once again from Mesopotamia, at the time when the contact was restored between the Sumerians and Northern Mesopotamian (Mari-Brak-Chuera). For this resumption of contact, we set the accent more on the changes observed in the stratigraphy (abandoned sites or burned) to speak about a phenomenon which we called “the Sumerianisation”. Moreover, we tried to identify this phenomenon by the means of some inscriptions dated to the Dynastic archaic III (towards 2600-2500 B. C.)