Rozprawy doktorskie na temat „Défense (procédure civile) – Haïti”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Sprawdź 19 najlepszych rozpraw doktorskich naukowych na temat „Défense (procédure civile) – Haïti”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Przeglądaj rozprawy doktorskie z różnych dziedzin i twórz odpowiednie bibliografie.
Boyer, Kevin. "Les droits de la défense dans le système judiciaire haitien". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022TOUL0153.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe haitian legal system has significantly weakened these past thirty years. The courts are facing permanent malfunctionning. This fragility fits in a larger context of a country that has political, economical and social difficulties. However, the complexity of the legal situation has an important impact on the effectiveness of the defense's rights, particularly in civil matter. Despite the fact that some legal progresses were made, the procedural guarantees during the trial does not protect enough the parties in the haïtian law.This study of the defense's rights in the haïtian legal system tries to analyze the effectiveness of these rights before, during and after the trial. It points out the legal and extra-legal causes that could explain the ineffectiveness of the defense's rights in the country. In the light of the dynamism of the french law, under the impulse of the European convention of human rights, this thesis tackles suggestions to improve the procedural guarantees of all parties in the haïtian legal system
Glaude, Harry-Daniel. "Accélération du cours de la justice civile et respect des droits de la défense". Paris 10, 2000. http://www.theses.fr/2000PA100098.
Pełny tekst źródłaSansone, Guillaume. "Les sanctions en procédure civile". Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019AIXM0468.
Pełny tekst źródłaIrrecevabilité, nullités de forme et de fond, caducité, péremption, radiations, exception d’incompétence, etc… Many procedural sanctions can threaten the litigant during the trial. These threats are real, but their outlines are blurry. The code of civil procedure appears to contains a rigorous and harmonious sanction law. However, many technical imperfections are unveiled whenever a sanction is determined or pronounced. This study has attempted a comprehensive inventory of these imperfections. During the last decade, lawmakers have not tackled these technical flaws, and kept on using sanctions as tools to serve interests of judicial policy. In reality, this policy of using sanctions as legal instruments goes against the true spirit and ambitions of the author of the law reducing disputes at all cost. This policy goes against the very conception of the civil procedure as a servant of private rights. These flaws being exposed, we proposed a new method, being more respectful of justice. For this method to flourish, it had to come with a rethought typology of sanctions, which corrects these imperfections. Too often, procedural error is reduced to it sanction component. In fact, once the sanction has been identified, some questions remain unanswered, among which the most decisive one: pronounce or avoid the sanction. In order to answer this question, the rules governing the application of sanctions had to be reconsidered
Massot, Sonia. "Les manoeuvres dilatoires dans le procès civil". Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018AIXM0442/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe use of dilatory practices in the civil trial affects the perennial running of a legal caseby prolonging it. Indeed, these procedural behaviors impede the proper functioning of the public justice service. The litigant unfairly diverts time, in order to benefit from it, at the expense of his opponent. We find these dilatory practices all along the civil trial. They even start before the referral to the courts and run until the use of remedies. The legislator endeavors to simplify the running of legal cases thanks to multiple reforms of the civil proceeding. He establishes principles, mechanisms and sanctions in order to fight this phenomenon and to improve the celerity. We can rightly wonder if these means can successfully eradicate this scourge. This analysis reveals that the understanding of the « dilatory practices »’s meaning is ̏ a priori ˝ not easy for lawyers. Unfortunately, it is sometimes confused with other notions having similar characteristics. Therefore, the eradication of this phenomenon first requires a good understanding and a further clarification of the concept. This is the one necessary condition to determine the more adapted solutions for eradicating the use of dilatory practices in the civil trial
Duchosal, David. "Les droits de la défense en droit communautaire : procédures de concurrence". Paris 2, 1993. http://www.theses.fr/1993PA020066.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe legal notion of rights of defence in european law has known an unbroken and continual crystallisation before being amount to the status of a basic due process. The european court of justice has first drawed the main lines of this legal building. In the first place, and after being started from the state members law systems, by confering on the rights of defence a specific european size. Then, by asserting the possibility for a company to organize freely its defence with the legal means of secret and expression. Furthermore, the court of first instance and then, the european court of human rights have recently taken turns to bind indefectibly the basic rights of a due process of law and appeal to the rights of defence. Thank to this decisive jurisdictionnal start, the rights of defence are on the point to get in european law a legal value which put them at the top of due process of competition law the most protective from the administrative arbitrary
Leroy, Jacques. "La constitution de partie civile à fins vindicatives : défense et illustration de l'article 2 du code de procédure pénale". Paris 12, 1990. http://www.theses.fr/1990PA12A004.
Pełny tekst źródłaAyrault, Ludovic. "Le contrôle juridictionnel de la régularité de la procédure d'imposition". Paris 2, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002PA020112.
Pełny tekst źródłaChillault, Isabelle. "La personne et son défenseur dans le procès pénal : contribution à l'analyse des droits de la défense". Poitiers, 1985. http://www.theses.fr/1985POIT3211.
Pełny tekst źródłaMeledje, Akpa Henri. "Les principes fondamentaux de célérité et des droits de la défense et le code de procédure civile commerciale et administrative ivoirien". Paris 2, 1986. http://www.theses.fr/1986PA020052.
Pełny tekst źródłaThis research is on a new model of procedural code concerning the civil rights trade and administration in the ivory-coast. The study was based on two fondamental principles: swiftness in the dispensation of justice and defence rights. Decreed on 1972, this code is a large extent a product of the country's history. Although modified, or adapted to suit the local environment, signs of colonial rule are still present. In fact the study tried to show the evolution in time and space of world event of which this code is the product. An effort has been made to show the originality of this code, and the differences between it and french procedure. The originality comes from the fact that there is a common judicial procedure to all branches of law as against french's which has a specific procedure for each branch of law. However, there is still a lot to do in the technicalities of the code as many procedural rule are either not covend at all or are shallowly treated. Furthermore, inspite of the sound structure for swiftness (unified tribunals and procedures, thereby reducing the nomber of steps and time required to complete a case) adopted by the authors of the code, many juges apparently and paradoxically make it difficult for suitors, maybe as a result of their training which was not originally geared to handle the new situation. Besides, the authors of the code completely ignored the theme "defence rights" apparenteltly because they were much more preoccuped with the dispensation of justice. And that is all the more reason why (the topic of) this study was chosen -knowing fully well that swiftness can make defence rights to suffer even more. Finally, one thing that can be said is that a code exists; but to have a code is one thing, and (to know) the reality is another
Gatheron, Sandrine. "Les recours en interprétation en droit". Lyon 3, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002LYO33016.
Pełny tekst źródłaMendes, Constante Jorge. "Les droits fondamentaux du justiciable". Aix-Marseille 3, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002AIX32055.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe basic rights of justiciable determine today the substantial axis around of which the Right of justice is articulated. It is towards the respect of the basic right to the judge and the basic right to the respect of the rights of the defense which the objective rules of jurisdictional and procedural organization must be durably turned. The French and Portuguese constitutional systems conceal a strong potential specialist in comparative literature, and in spite of the differences, the decisions of the convergent court constitutional towards the valorization of the basic rights of the justiciable one. The Community and European judges take part in the rooting of theses rights which to the bottom belong into clean neither to the constitutional law, nor of the European right, but of European pools. The existence of the rights of justiciable to the row to basic rights protected by the constitutional and European law results essentially from a jurisprudential development process. It is then by probing abundant jurisprudences of the constitutional and supranational judges, that it is possible to reveal the common existence of the basic rights of justiciable in Europe (First part). The study of the contents of the basic rights of justiciable allows evincer confusions which remain numerous between the substantial rights of justiciable and the jurisdictional or processual rules the new requirement of effectivity, which remains associated with these basic rights of the justiciable one, gives them contents concrete and led to wonder on the one hand about the implications which can result it for the State in terms from obligations to achieve, and on the other hand, to measure their radiation in the legal order interns of the two studied countrie. Ultimately, it is a question of seeking the consequences of their common existence, to try to account fot the efficiency of the basic rights of the justiciable. (Second left). The application of these two basic rights can attest qualitative evolution of the modern concept of State because both are the sign of a reinforced democracy, irrigated by justice
Akuesson, Ernest Tonawa. "Les exceptions de procédure dans le procès civil". Thesis, Paris 1, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA01D005/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe false qualification of "defense" awarded by tradition to the procedural objection led the legislator to submit it to a totally inconsistent and unsuitable regime. The illustration is given by the failure noticed by the exclusivity of competence awarded to the judge of the enabled on the procedural objections, failure materializing by the numerous dispensations which the jurisprudence continues bringing to their regime. It is also translated by the quasi-impossibility for the applicant in the main action to claim it in whole contradiction with the spirit of Law. This incoherence is finally illustrated by the opportunist confusions between procedural objection, refusal of the action's receving, incident and defense in fact. The procedural objection is not a defense but an incidental request relative to the step of the procedure which in term of logical order must be examined by prerequisite in fact. It thus interests only the procedural relationships that is to say the instance which the opening and the conduct (driving) in compliance with the articles 1 and 2 of the Code of civil procedure belong to the parties. The classification and the regime of the procedural objections have to take it into account. It is thus necessary to distinguish the procedural objections on the contrary to the opening of the authority of those who are set against its continuation. Only the first ones have to be a matter of the exclusive competence of the judge of the enabled of whom we have to manage to make a real judge of the introduction of the instance. The procedural objections opposed to the continuation, on the other hand, must be able to be suggested according to their emergence or to their revelation except the possibility for the judge ruling out them or pronouncing pecuniary condemnations against the party which would have abstained in a delaying or unfair intention to raise them earlier
Woitier, Maud. "La caution et le procès civil". Paris 1, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011PA010293.
Pełny tekst źródłaBoularbah, Hakim. "Requête unilatérale et inversion du contentieux". Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/210663.
Pełny tekst źródłaIl s’agit principalement d’analyser de manière approfondie la question de la conformité de ces procédures unilatérales aux règles du procès équitable et au principe général du droit imposant le respect des droits de la défense. L’étude tente de démontrer que le recours à la procédure unilatérale respecte ces règles et principe s'il est strictement encadré et s’il s'accompagne de garanties quant aux pouvoirs du juge qui connaît de la requête et aux voies de recours dont dispose la partie qui est condamnée sans être préalablement convoquée et entendue.
Cet objectif peut être atteint moyennant certaines interprétations nouvelles de la loi et plusieurs modifications légales. Des propositions de textes sont dès lors présentées pour améliorer le régime actuel des procédures sur requête unilatérale et l’adapter aux exigences dégagées à l’issue de l’étude.
Doctorat en droit
info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
Kamwe, Mouaffo Marie-Colette. "Droit de confidentialité et droits de la défense dans les procédures communautaires de concurrence : Union européenne (U.E.) et Communautés d'Afrique subsaharienne (UEMOA et CEMAC)". Montpellier 1, 2007. http://www.theses.fr/2007MON10005.
Pełny tekst źródłaBen, Marzoug Mohamed. "Vers l'intégration des Technologies d'Information et de Communication (TIC) dans le procès civil". Thesis, Montpellier 1, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014MON10023.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe justice system in general and the civil suit in particular not been spared by the movement of dematerialisation wich has affected many areas of public service. In fact, the introduction of ICT in the civil suit was fueled primarily by the quest for speed and efficiency. However, the need arose to balance these two objectives with the requirement of compliance with procedural and institutional guarantees for a fair trial. This is because the quest to accelerate judicial time and save resources allocated to this service sould not undermine the quality of civil judgments. Reconciling these three requirements is revealed as the major obstacle hindering the process of ICT integration in civil suits. Nevertheless, it is all about balance: computer technology should not prevail over the legal system and the spirit of justice. It is essential the authenticity and modernity go hand in hand
Jobert, Sylvain. "La connaissance des actes du procès civil par les parties". Thesis, Paris 2, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020070.
Pełny tekst źródłaIn civil law procedures, the parties’ knowledge of the acts of the trial is essential; it guarantees that certain principles, such as the adversarial principle, will be respected. However, a difficulty arises: it is hard to determine whether a party has in fact become aware of the act which was communicated to him. The question is to determine whether the law can accept such a difficulty. To this end, two divergent models can be provided. In the formalistic one, the choice is made to favor the knowledge of the acts of the trial beforehand, in order to be able to become disinterested in their actual knowledge afterwards, all the means having been implemented to carry this out. In the realistic one, the way in which the acts of the trial are brought to the parties' attention is neglected, but thereafter, there is a resurgent focus on the knowledge the parties have genuinely had. The study reveals that the law of civil trial was initially based on a predominantly formalistic model, but this model has evolved, especially during the last decade. Under the influence of contemporary concerns in order to rationalize justice costs and increase the protection of the parties' fundamental rights, the formalism of civil lawsuit has been tempered. Should it be even more moderate? This work neither pleads for the subversion of the classical model nor for its reinstatement. Instead, it is a nuanced evolution of the law which is suggested. It suggests to promote formalism when legal certainty requires it, without sacrificing the benefit of lightening the rules when it is necessary
Allard, Baptiste. "L'action de groupe : étude franco-américaine des actions collectives en défense des intérêts individuels d'autrui". Thesis, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016USPCB128.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe French debate on collective actions is characterised by a central contradiction: while US class actions almost systematically serve as the starting point of discussions among French lawyers, they remain widely unknown to them. Being a reason for hope, admiration as well as fear, the American model of class actions can explain why the introduction of collective actions in French law was decided, why it was delayed for so long, and the many flaws of the resulting legislation
Reichling, Noemie. "Les principes directeurs du procès civil dans l'Espace judiciaire européen". Thesis, Normandie, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017NORMC021/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaSince the Treaty of Amsterdam entered into force on the 1st of May 1999 and the “communitarisation” of judicial cooperation in civil matters, the European Union has adopted many legal instruments relating to cross-border litigation, to the extent that one can now refer to a distinct “European International Private Law”, the governing principles of which have yet to be defined. By comparison, the French Code of Civil Procedure includes an entire chapter devoted to the governing principles applicable to civil trials. Based on a study of the European civil justice area, four governing principles can be identified: the adversarial principle, the principle of the judge’s active role, the principle of urgency and the principle of cross-border dialogue. In prospective terms, it follows that the possibility of these four principles’ being enacted in EU law is a matter worthy of examination. Several obstacles can be identified, none of which appears to be insuperable. Having been recognised as a possibility, such a consecration also seems desirable on the grounds of its several demonstrable advantages. The legal basis and vehicle of the above-mentioned four principles’ legal enshrinement remain to be determined. In this regard, article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pertaining to judicial cooperation in civil matters, couldserve as a legal basis. In terms of implementation, this study also argues in favor of regulations over directives