Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Declaration of claim”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Spis treści
Zobacz listy aktualnych artykułów, książek, rozpraw, streszczeń i innych źródeł naukowych na temat „Declaration of claim”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat "Declaration of claim"
Pinto, M. Christopher W. "The Philippine Claim Against China". Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 4, nr 2 (6.12.2016): 151–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22134484-00402002.
Pełny tekst źródłaHan, Choong-Soo. "The Study on the New Style of Declaration Claim". Yonsei Law Review 30, nr 3 (30.09.2020): 1–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.21717/ylr.30.3.1.
Pełny tekst źródłaPerry, Michael J. "FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE AS RELIGIOUS AND MORAL FREEDOM". Journal of Law and Religion 29, nr 1 (3.01.2014): 124–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2013.1.
Pełny tekst źródłaPłaziuk, Jakub. "Charakter prawny procesowego i pozaprocesowego oświadczenia woli o potrąceniu w kontekście zarzutu potrącenia zawartego w art. 203 1 k.p.c." Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Seria Prawnicza. Prawo 29 (2020): 213–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.15584/znurprawo.2020.29.14.
Pełny tekst źródłaVidmar, Jure. "Catalonia and the Law of Statehood". German Yearbook of International Law 63, nr 1 (1.01.2022): 277–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.277.
Pełny tekst źródłaRossi, Carla, i Francesca Rivetti. "Assessing Young Consumers’ Responses to Sustainable Labels: Insights from a Factorial Experiment in Italy". Sustainability 12, nr 23 (3.12.2020): 10115. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su122310115.
Pełny tekst źródłaMcGrady, Benn. "Philip Morris v. Uruguay: The Punta del Este Declaration on the Implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control". European Journal of Risk Regulation 2, nr 2 (czerwiec 2011): 254–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1867299x00001215.
Pełny tekst źródłaDe Vries, Gerard, Xabier Basozábal, Marc Billiau, G. Orfanidis i Mineke De Theije. "BGH, 17.7.2003 - Set-off against a claim that had been awarded by an enforceable decision before the proceedings of the principal claim commenced". European Review of Private Law 13, Issue 1 (1.02.2005): 39–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/erpl2005003.
Pełny tekst źródłaPark, Hyun Ah. "Review on the Korean Supreme Court Case on Legal Interest for Confirmation in a Lawsuit for Negative Confirmation Brought by an Insurance Company: Korean Supreme Court Case No. 2018Da257958・257965 rendered on 7 June 2021". Korean Insurance Law Association 16, nr 2 (30.06.2022): 189–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.36248/kdps.2022.16.2.189.
Pełny tekst źródłaWilson, Tamfuh Y. N. "The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights 1948: Successes and Challenges". African Journal of International and Comparative Law 30, nr 4 (listopad 2022): 599–618. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2022.0427.
Pełny tekst źródłaRozprawy doktorskie na temat "Declaration of claim"
Ligan, Mahoutin. "La déclaration de créances et le nouveau droit des entreprises en difficulté : Approche comparative Droit français/Droit OHADA". Electronic Thesis or Diss., Toulon, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020TOUL0136.
Pełny tekst źródłaThe declaration of claim is a compulsory procedure reserved for all creditors of a debtor who is the subject of collective proceedings. It has a mainly financial purpose and its objective is to ascertain the debtor's liabilities, and therefore to measure his indebtedness on the day of the opening judgment. This is justified by the fact that the new law on companies in difficulty, unlike the old bankruptcy, introduces a submission to the rigorous rules of collective discipline for all the creditors of the failing company. It goes without saying that the declaration of claims is of considerable benefit to the debtor in that it allows the court to assess (after the verification and admission of claims) the possible solutions for rescuing the failing company through the weight of its liabilities. Similarly, it makes it possible to maintain a certain equality between the company's creditors, who will ensure that their rights are recognised in order to safeguard their chance of participating in the collective procedure of their debtor. Its legal basis is specified by Articles L. 622-24 et seq. of the French Commercial Code and 78 et seq. of the Uniform Act Organising Collective Proceedings (AUPC).Thus, from the publication of the opening judgment, all creditors whose claims arose prior to the opening judgment and subsequent creditors excluded from the preferential treatment of Article L. 662-17 of the French Commercial Code, with the exception of employees, shall send a declaration of their claims to the judicial representative within two (2) months. Where the creditor has been relieved of foreclosure in accordance with Article L. 622-26 of the French Commercial Code, the time limits only run from the notification of this decision; they are then reduced by half. The time limit for filing a claim runs from the notification of this warning. Traditionally, a claim declaration was treated as a legal claim. Thus, until the Ordinance of 12 March 2014, a special written mandate was required for the validity of a declaration made by a person other than the debtor. Similarly, the agent then had to be able to provide proof of the mandate received until the day the judge ruled. In the new law on companies in difficulty, the declaration of claim is perceived as a simple conservatory act, insofar as it is, in certain respects, more akin to a formal notice or an administrative formality. We owe this reconsideration of the nature of the declaration of claim to the French order of 12 March 2014.This is to be welcomed insofar as this development contributes to improving the preservation of creditors' rights. Despite the close relationship between French and OHADA legislation, it must be noted that the OHADA legislator has not taken advantage of its recent reform of 10 September 2015 to simplify the procedure for declaring claims as was done in 2014 in France. While such a failure can be justified by the youth of the legislation in force in the OHADA zone, it is appropriate for the OHADA legislator to consider a change in this area. In our opinion, this could encourage the debtor to provide the bodies of the procedure with a complete list of his creditors and thus enable the latter to benefit from the same chances of being paid
Mouri, Allahyar. "The international law of expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal". Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 1993. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.321214.
Pełny tekst źródłaNoirot, Renaud. "Les dates de naissance des créances". Thesis, Paris 5, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013PA05D016/document.
Pełny tekst źródłaIt is the laws governing companies experiencing difficulties which have revealed the complexity of determining the dates of the origination of the claims. And yet this appears to be fundamental in private law. As it constitutes the criterion for implementing certain legal mechanisms, it epitomizes the existence of the claim and hence represents a challenge for any rule of law in which the existence of this claim is a goal or condition. There are two conflicting doctrinal currents: the traditional approach sets the date of origination at the stage of the formation of the contract, while modern approaches situate it at the stage of the execution of the contract. The materialistic approach, based on the law governing companies experiencing difficulties, staggers the origination of the price debt over the period of the execution of the service. The periodical approach, which relies on a doctrinal reflection on successive execution contracts, is that of the re-origination of all the claims under the contract at each contractual period. An examination of the modern approaches, under the auspices of the legal mechanisms which can only epitomize the true date of origination of the authentic claim leads to the invalidity thereof. The traditional approach is therefore once again consecrated. But the resistance constituted by the laws governing companies in difficulty cannot rely on the technique of legal fiction, because other manifestations of the same phenomenon can be identified outside this domain. Therefore, a change of paradigm is in order if the hiatus is to be resolved. Behind this persistent phenomenon lies in fact another vision, another concept of the claim: the economic claim which, interwoven with the legal claim in the private law system, supplements it. The duality of the dates of origination therefore conceals in its bosom the duality of the very concept of a claim, the traditional legal claim and the economic claim. The economic claim is not a subjective personal right. It is not a legal claim. It is not autonomous of the legal claim and must not be confused with a claim originating in a case of unwarranted enrichment. The economic claim represents the value produced by the contract as the service which characterizes it is provided. It permits the rectification of the ordinary application of the concept of legal claim by ensuring the function of correlating the proceeds with the costs of a commodity or an activity. Its domains of application are varied. In addition to its use in accounting and fiscal law, the economic claim permits the determination of the portion transferred in the context of the transfer of a contract, the determination of the collateral consisting in a special-purpose fund in the context of a legal joint estate, a limited liability individual contractor or a trust, as well as the determination of the liabilities which escape the discipline of collective proceedings. In these domains, it is therefore not the date of origination of the legal claim which applies, but the date of origination of the economic claim. The coherence of the private law system is therefore restored as concerns the date of the origination of the claim
Lu, Wei-Yang, i 盧惟揚. "Claim for Injunction concerning Declaration and Compulsory Execution". Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/827tkv.
Pełny tekst źródła國立臺灣大學
法律學研究所
107
The thesis is constructed by 5 chapters. Chapter 1 is a preface, including the theory review in Taiwan, the purpose, the method and the research scope of this thesis. The main research of this thesis is in chapter 2 to chapter 4. The context of these three chapters is a procedure which starts at the claim for injunction, and finally ends to the enforcement. The chapter 5 is a conclusion. The main subjects of this thesis are the injunction for nuisance and the injunction for unfair competition. The focus of the injunction for nuisance is that it’s not sure whether the compulsory execution for an obligation of inaction can fulfill the purpose to restrain a nuisance or not. In order to resolve this problem, the first way is that the plaintiff can claim for a mandatory injunction in litigation proceedings so that he can use execution by substitute in execution proceedings. The second way is that the obligee can directly ask the execution court to issue an order that decides the obligor’s obligation of ation so that he can also use execution by substitute to restrain the nuisance. These two methods have its pros and cons. The problem of the solution in litigation proceedings is that, if there are at last two ways can restrain the nuisance, the right of choice belonging to whom is at issue. On the other hand, the solution in execution proceedings is that, because the obligation of action doesn’t fall in the scope of res judicata, in other words, it happens a phenomenon of objective scope of enforcement force''s extension, the problem is that whether the execution court has the entitlement to decide this obligation, and how to issue this order. As a comparative law’s reference, the design and execution of Japan Civil Execution Act Article 171 paragraph (1) is useful to this problem. The focus of the injunction for unfair competition is that, if the defendant changes his type of infringement after the conclusion of oral arguments, the injunction would be useless. In Taiwan, the court apt to resolve this problem in litigation proceedings by allowing plaintiff to use an abstract declaration. In comparative laws, according to the solution in execution proceedings, Germany’s the core theory, Japan’s the transformation of a certificate of execution theory are created. By introducing these theories, it may provide us other ideas to resolve this kind of problem.
Jaeschke, Mark A. "Anmeldung und Feststellung von Forderungen im Insolvenzverfahren". Doctoral thesis, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-0006-B34D-4.
Pełny tekst źródłaTaillefer, Annie. "Identification des freins et leviers associés à l’expérience de la mise en oeuvre de l’autodéclaration environnementale au coeur de PME québécoises". Thèse, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/18393.
Pełny tekst źródłaUbiquitous in the business management’s strategy, environmental issues are a distinctive factor in what drives the manufacturing sector. Taking part in a trend that requires a high level of enthusiasm, environmental concerns of manufactured products are on the rise as of recent. Based on the ideology of sustainable development and on eco-design statements, companies tend to take advantage of environmental properties by using it as a main sales argument. As a result, environmental communication is gaining more and more importance through advertising so-called green marketing. Self-declaration is among these communications tools. Self-declaration is the most permissive tool and allows great freedom to manufacturers. In regard to its flexibility, it lacks guidelines. Therefore, it often results in a miscommunication and a misunderstanding where veracity can be questioned. The lack of accuracy of the argument can be the result of the industry’s unwillingness or a good will with pitfalls concerning the comprehension and use of the norm’s guidelines. The opinion of stakeholders is thus divided. Therefore, the reputation of self-declaration has been under the spotlight for sometime. Although being the simplest, cheapest and less time-consuming of all environmental tools, self-declaration is still highly used in the manufacturing industry. As 98 % of Québec’s industry is represented by small businesses (BDC, 2011:1), their reality of having limited resources makes it appropriate to use self-declaration. The popularity of the environmental compliance attracts consumers interest towards green products. However, the global controversy about those tends to impair consumers’ craze. In some cases, it may favor a cautious attitude and suggest a marketing skeems. This is likely to extrapolate and generalize consumers’ negative perceptions towards the entire green products market segment. The companies’ ethical principles are being questioned. The lack of accuracy of the argument due to the tool’s insufficient directives makes it hard to defend their arguments. This qualitative research aims to highlight the self-declaration procedures. This multiples case study document the path of small and medium businesses in Québec concerned with self-declared environmental approaches; both business managers and advisors of the Institute of Product Development are invited to semi-directed interviews. The data analysis presents the benefits of the use of “double labeling”. This strategy combines the benefits of certification and self-declaration. In the process of strategically enhancing the standing of self-declaration, ‘double labelling’ would be an option to adopt, the ultimate goal being a well deserved recognition of its merits. This research invites industrial designers to get more involved in the development of communication, due to their skills and knowledge.
Książki na temat "Declaration of claim"
Wehberg, Hans. The outlawry of war: A series of lectures delivered before the Academy of International Law at the Hague and in the Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales at Geneva. Buffalo, N.Y: W.S. Hein & Co., 2000.
Znajdź pełny tekst źródłaLudwig, Kirk. Declarations and Status Functions. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789994.003.0012.
Pełny tekst źródłaParpworth, Neil. 15. Judicial review remedies. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198810704.003.0015.
Pełny tekst źródłaWang, Weiguo. 6 National Report for the People’s Republic of China. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198727293.003.0006.
Pełny tekst źródłaMartin, Scheinin, i Åhrén Mattias. Part I The UNDRIP’s Relationship to Existing International Law, Ch.3 Relationship to Human Rights, and Related International Instruments. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199673223.003.0004.
Pełny tekst źródłaSime, Stuart. 49. Judicial Review. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198823100.003.6072.
Pełny tekst źródłaSime, Stuart. 49. Judicial review. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198747673.003.6072.
Pełny tekst źródłaSime, Stuart. 49. Judicial review. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198787570.003.6072.
Pełny tekst źródłaAndrew, Clapham. War. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198810469.001.0001.
Pełny tekst źródłaTomlinson, Matt, i Julian Millie. Conclusion. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190652807.003.0014.
Pełny tekst źródłaCzęści książek na temat "Declaration of claim"
"The Explicit Declaration". W At the Origin of the Christian Claim, 70–79. McGill-Queen's University Press, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780773567092-010.
Pełny tekst źródłavon Falck, Andreas, i Stephan Dorn. "Rule 61: Declaration of non-infringement". W Unified Patent Protection in Europe: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755463.003.0253.
Pełny tekst źródłavon Falck, Andreas, i Stephan Dorn. "Rule 64: Language of the Statement for a declaration of non-infringement and fee for the declaration of non-infringement". W Unified Patent Protection in Europe: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755463.003.0256.
Pełny tekst źródłaParpworth, Neil. "15. Judicial review remedies". W Constitutional and Administrative Law, 354–66. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198847120.003.0015.
Pełny tekst źródłaParpworth, Neil. "15. Judicial review remedies". W Constitutional and Administrative Law, 361–74. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192856579.003.0015.
Pełny tekst źródłavon Falck, Andreas, i Stephan Dorn. "Rule 76: Actions for declaration of non-infringement within Article 33(6) of the Agreement". W Unified Patent Protection in Europe: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755463.003.0269.
Pełny tekst źródłaTomba, Massimiliano. "1793: The Neglected Legacy of Insurgent Universality". W Insurgent Universality, 30–70. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190883089.003.0002.
Pełny tekst źródłaEndicott, Timothy. "11. Standing: litigation and the public interest". W Administrative Law, 428–64. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192893567.003.0011.
Pełny tekst źródłaTaylor, Stephen, i Astra Emir. "4. Unfair dismissal—reasons and remedies". W Employment Law, 85–100. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806752.003.0004.
Pełny tekst źródłaEndicott, Timothy. "11. Standing: litigation and the public interest". W Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804734.003.0011.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenia konferencji na temat "Declaration of claim"
Storozhuk, Alexander. "BAI JUYI AND ORIGINS OF THE NEW YUEFU". W 10th International Conference "Issues of Far Eastern Literatures (IFEL 2022)". St. Petersburg State University, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/11701/9785288063770.07.
Pełny tekst źródłaCodrean, Violeta. "Accounting and tax aspects regarding compromised debts". W Conferința științifică internațională studențească „Provocările contabilității în viziunea tinerilor cercetători”, ediția VII. Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.53486/issc2023.27.
Pełny tekst źródłaCurta, Florin. "Slavii timpurii şi etnogeneza lor în arheologia sovietică și post-sovietică". W Cercetarea și valorificarea patrimoniului arheologic medieval. "Ion Creanga" State Pedagogical University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37710/idn-c12-2022-14-30.
Pełny tekst źródłaRaporty organizacyjne na temat "Declaration of claim"
Butler, Bryan, Tom Barse, Nahla V. Bassil i Kim Lewers. How we came to have the 'Monocacy' hop. Yakima, WA: Hop Growers of America, sierpień 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2023.8127202.ars.
Pełny tekst źródła